Sustainable Technology of 3620

Sustainable Technology of 3620 ?

It appears you might be asking about the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS, a device used for measuring various water quality parameters. Here’s how it relates to sustainability:

• Multi-parameter measurement: This device can measure multiple parameters like pH, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and turbidity simultaneously. This reduces the need for multiple devices, saving resources and cost.
• Digital sensor recognition: The device uses digital sensors that are more accurate and reliable than traditional sensors. This leads to better data quality and more informed decisions about water management.
• Wireless communication: The device can be used wirelessly, making it easier to collect data in remote or difficult-to-access locations. This is particularly useful for environmental monitoring and ensuring water quality in diverse areas.
• Data management: The device can store and transfer data, allowing for easy analysis and tracking of water quality trends over time. This information can be used to develop sustainable water management strategies.

Overall, the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS contributes to sustainability by:

• Conserving resources: By combining multiple measurements in one device.
• Improving data accuracy: Leading to better water management decisions.
• Facilitating environmental monitoring: In various locations.
• Enabling data-driven strategies: For sustainable water use.

If you have any other questions about this device or its role in sustainable technology, feel free to ask!

What is Sustainable Technology of 3620 ?

The WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS is a portable device used for measuring various water quality parameters. Here’s how it relates to sustainability:

• Multi-parameter measurement: This device can measure multiple parameters like pH, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and turbidity simultaneously. This reduces the need for multiple devices, saving resources and cost.
• Digital sensor recognition: The device uses digital sensors that are more accurate and reliable than traditional sensors. This leads to better data quality and more informed decisions about water management.
• Wireless communication: The device can be used wirelessly, making it easier to collect data in remote or difficult-to-access locations. This is particularly useful for environmental monitoring and ensuring water quality in diverse areas.
• Data management: The device can store and transfer data, allowing for easy analysis and tracking of water quality trends over time. This information can be used to develop sustainable water management strategies.

Overall, the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS contributes to sustainability by:

• Conserving resources: By combining multiple measurements in one device.
• Improving data accuracy: Leading to better water management decisions.
• Facilitating environmental monitoring: In various locations.
• Enabling data-driven strategies: For sustainable water use.

If you have any other questions about this device or its role in sustainable technology, feel free to ask!

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3620 ?

The WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS is a versatile tool that can be valuable to a wide range of users and industries. Here are some of the key groups who would find it beneficial:

1. Environmental Monitoring:

• Researchers: Studying water quality in rivers, lakes, and oceans.
• Consultants: Assessing environmental impact and pollution levels.
• Government agencies: Monitoring water quality for regulatory compliance.
• Conservation organizations: Protecting aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity.

2. Water Treatment and Management:

• Water treatment plants: Ensuring the quality of drinking water.
• Wastewater treatment facilities: Monitoring effluent to protect the environment.
• Industrial facilities: Managing water used in manufacturing processes.
• Aquaculture: Maintaining optimal water conditions for fish farming.

3. Agriculture:

• Farmers: Monitoring water quality for irrigation and livestock.
• Agricultural researchers: Studying the impact of water quality on crops.

4. Laboratories:

• Analytical labs: Performing water quality testing for various clients.
• Research labs: Conducting experiments that require precise water quality control.

5. Other Industries:

• Food and beverage: Ensuring water quality in production processes.
• Pharmaceuticals: Maintaining water purity for drug manufacturing.
• Mining: Monitoring water quality in mining operations.

Why is it useful for them?

• Portability: The device is portable, making it ideal for field work and on-site measurements.
• Multi-parameter capability: It can measure multiple parameters simultaneously, saving time and resources.
• Digital technology: Digital sensors provide accurate and reliable data.
• Wireless communication: Wireless data transfer simplifies data collection and analysis.
• Durability: The device is designed to withstand harsh environments.

Overall, the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS is a valuable tool for anyone who needs to monitor and manage water quality, contributing to both environmental protection and efficient resource management.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3620 ?

The WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS is a versatile tool that can be used in a variety of situations where water quality monitoring is crucial. Here are some key times when it would be particularly valuable:

1. Routine Monitoring:

• Regular water quality checks: For water treatment plants, wastewater facilities, and environmental monitoring programs, the device can be used for routine checks to ensure compliance with regulations and track trends over time.
• Seasonal changes: Monitoring water quality during different seasons can help identify variations and potential issues related to weather patterns or agricultural practices.
• Baseline data collection: When starting a new project or study, the device can be used to establish baseline water quality data for comparison and future analysis.

2. Investigating Issues:

• Pollution events: If there is a suspected pollution event, the device can be used to quickly assess the extent of contamination and identify the source.
• Algae blooms: Monitoring nutrient levels and other parameters can help predict and manage algae blooms in lakes and rivers.
• Fish kills: Investigating fish kills often requires immediate water quality testing to determine the cause, such as low dissolved oxygen or high levels of toxins.

3. Remote Locations:

• Field studies: Researchers conducting field studies in remote areas can use the device to collect data on water quality without needing to transport samples back to a lab.
• Difficult-to-access areas: The wireless capability of the device makes it ideal for monitoring water quality in locations that are hard to reach, such as wells, rivers in dense forests, or industrial discharge points.

4. Specific Applications:

• Aquaculture: Maintaining optimal water quality is crucial for fish health and productivity. The device can be used to monitor parameters like dissolved oxygen, pH, and ammonia levels.
• Agriculture: Farmers can use the device to monitor water quality for irrigation and livestock, ensuring healthy crops and animals.
• Industrial processes: Many industries rely on water in their processes. The device can be used to monitor water quality at various stages to ensure efficiency and prevent equipment damage.

Overall, the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS is a valuable tool whenever and wherever accurate and reliable water quality data is needed. Its portability, multi-parameter capabilities, and digital technology make it suitable for a wide range of applications and situations.

COURTESY : Top Picks Network

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3620 ?

The WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS is a valuable tool in a wide range of locations where water quality monitoring is essential. Here are some key settings where it is particularly useful:

1. Natural Environments:

• Rivers and streams: Monitoring water quality for pollution, ecosystem health, and biodiversity.
• Lakes and ponds: Assessing nutrient levels, algae blooms, and overall water quality for recreational use and aquatic life.
• Oceans and coastal areas: Measuring parameters like pH, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity to understand the impact of pollution and climate change.
• Groundwater wells: Ensuring the safety of drinking water sources.
• Wetlands: Monitoring water quality to protect these vital ecosystems.

2. Water Treatment and Distribution:

• Water treatment plants: Controlling and optimizing the treatment process to ensure safe drinking water.
• Wastewater treatment facilities: Monitoring effluent quality to comply with environmental regulations and protect receiving waters.
• Distribution systems: Checking water quality at various points in the distribution network to identify potential contamination or issues.

3. Industrial Settings:

• Manufacturing plants: Monitoring water used in production processes to ensure quality and prevent equipment damage.
• Power plants: Analyzing water used for cooling and other purposes to optimize efficiency and minimize environmental impact.
• Mining operations: Monitoring water quality to prevent pollution from runoff and tailings.

4. Agriculture and Aquaculture:

• Farms: Testing irrigation water and runoff to ensure crop health and prevent pollution.
• Aquaculture facilities: Maintaining optimal water quality for fish and other aquatic organisms.

5. Research and Monitoring:

• Environmental research: Collecting data for scientific studies on water quality and ecosystem health.
• Consulting firms: Assessing water quality for environmental impact assessments and remediation projects.
• Government agencies: Monitoring water quality for regulatory compliance and public health.

Overall, the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS is a versatile tool that can be used in any location where accurate and reliable water quality data is needed. Its portability, ruggedness, and multi-parameter capabilities make it suitable for both field work and laboratory settings.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3620 ?

The WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS is required when there is a need for accurate, reliable, and convenient water quality monitoring. This can be driven by various factors, including:

1. Regulatory Compliance:

• Meeting environmental standards: Many industries and organizations are required to monitor their water discharge to ensure compliance with environmental regulations. The MultiLine® 3620 IDS can help them measure parameters like pH, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity to meet these standards.
• Drinking water safety: Water treatment plants need to regularly monitor the quality of drinking water to ensure it meets safety standards. The device can be used to measure parameters like pH, conductivity, and turbidity to ensure water safety.

2. Environmental Protection:

• Monitoring ecosystem health: Researchers and environmental organizations use the device to assess the health of aquatic ecosystems by measuring parameters like dissolved oxygen, nutrients, and pollutants.
• Investigating pollution events: In case of a suspected pollution event, the device can be used to quickly assess the extent of contamination and identify the source.

3. Process Optimization:

• Water treatment efficiency: Water treatment plants can use the device to optimize the treatment process by monitoring parameters like pH and conductivity at various stages.
• Industrial water use: Industries can use the device to monitor the quality of water used in their processes to ensure efficiency and prevent equipment damage.

4. Data-Driven Decision Making:

• Long-term trend analysis: The device can store and transfer data, allowing for easy analysis and tracking of water quality trends over time. This information can be used to develop sustainable water management strategies.
• Real-time monitoring: The device can be used for real-time monitoring of water quality, providing immediate feedback for decision making in various applications like aquaculture and agriculture.

In summary, the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS is required whenever there is a need for reliable water quality data to ensure compliance, protect the environment, optimize processes, and make informed decisions about water management.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3620 ?

While I cannot provide a specific case study with exact data for the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS, I can create a hypothetical scenario based on its capabilities and typical applications to illustrate its use in a sustainable context.

Case Study: River Ecosystem Health Assessment

Background:

The “Green Valley River” is a vital waterway that supports a diverse ecosystem and provides water for agriculture and recreation. However, increasing urbanization and agricultural runoff have raised concerns about its water quality. A local environmental organization, “EcoWatch,” is conducting a long-term study to assess the river’s health and identify potential pollution sources.

Challenge:

EcoWatch needs to monitor various water quality parameters at multiple locations along the river to establish a baseline and track changes over time. Traditional methods of collecting samples and sending them to a lab are time-consuming and expensive. They need a portable and reliable solution that can provide real-time data in the field.

Solution:

EcoWatch adopts the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS for their monitoring program. The device’s multi-parameter capabilities allow them to measure pH, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and turbidity simultaneously at different points along the river. Its portability enables them to easily access remote locations and collect data on-site. The digital sensors ensure accurate and reliable measurements, and the wireless communication feature allows for easy data transfer and analysis.

Results:

• Comprehensive data collection: EcoWatch collects a wealth of data on the river’s water quality, identifying variations in parameters at different locations and times.
• Real-time insights: The MultiLine® 3620 IDS provides immediate feedback on water quality, allowing EcoWatch to identify potential pollution events quickly and take timely action.
• Trend analysis: By tracking data over time, EcoWatch can identify trends and patterns in water quality, helping them understand the impact of human activities and environmental changes.
• Data-driven decisions: The data collected by the MultiLine® 3620 IDS informs EcoWatch’s recommendations for sustainable water management practices, such as reducing agricultural runoff and improving wastewater treatment.

Sustainability Outcomes:

• Improved ecosystem health: By identifying and addressing water quality issues, EcoWatch contributes to the protection and restoration of the Green Valley River ecosystem.
• Sustainable water use: The data collected helps inform decisions about water allocation and management, ensuring the long-term availability of this vital resource.
• Community engagement: EcoWatch uses the data to raise awareness about water quality issues and engage the community in conservation efforts.

Conclusion:

The WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS proves to be a valuable tool for EcoWatch in their efforts to monitor and protect the Green Valley River. Its portability, multi-parameter capabilities, and digital technology enable them to collect accurate data, gain real-time insights, and make informed decisions about sustainable water management. This case study highlights how the MultiLine® 3620 IDS can contribute to environmental protection and sustainable resource management in various settings.

Remember that this is a hypothetical scenario. However, it illustrates the potential benefits of using the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS for sustainable water quality monitoring and management.

courtesy : Monash University Faculty of Science

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3620 ?

Unfortunately, a specific white paper solely focused on the “Sustainable Technology of 3620” (referring to the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS) is not readily available. However, we can compile the key information and benefits related to its sustainable aspects to create a conceptual outline for such a white paper.

Title: Sustainable Water Quality Monitoring with the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS

Abstract:

This white paper explores the contribution of the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS to sustainable water quality monitoring. It highlights the device’s features, benefits, and applications in various sectors, emphasizing its role in environmental protection, resource efficiency, and data-driven decision-making for a sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

• Briefly introduce the importance of water quality monitoring for environmental health, public safety, and sustainable development.
• State the challenges associated with traditional water quality monitoring methods.
• Introduce the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS as a solution for sustainable water quality monitoring.

2. Sustainable Features and Benefits:

• Multi-parameter measurement:
  • Describe the device’s ability to measure multiple parameters simultaneously (pH, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, turbidity, etc.).
  • Explain how this reduces the need for multiple devices, conserving resources and minimizing waste.
• Digital sensor technology:
  • Highlight the accuracy and reliability of digital sensors compared to traditional sensors.
  • Emphasize how this leads to better data quality and more informed decisions about water management.
• Portability and wireless communication:
  • Discuss the device’s portability for field work and remote monitoring.
  • Explain how wireless communication simplifies data collection and transfer, reducing time and effort.
• Data management and analysis:
  • Describe the device’s data storage and transfer capabilities.
  • Explain how this enables trend analysis and data-driven decision-making for sustainable water management strategies.

3. Applications in Sustainable Contexts:

• Environmental monitoring:
  • Discuss the device’s use in assessing ecosystem health, identifying pollution sources, and tracking long-term water quality trends.
• Water treatment and management:
  • Explain how the device helps optimize water treatment processes, ensuring safe drinking water and minimizing waste.
  • Discuss its role in monitoring wastewater effluent to protect the environment.
• Agriculture and aquaculture:
  • Highlight the device’s use in monitoring irrigation water quality and maintaining optimal conditions for fish farming, promoting sustainable food production.
• Industrial water use:
  • Explain how the device helps industries monitor water quality in their processes, ensuring efficiency and minimizing environmental impact.

4. Case Studies (Hypothetical or Real):

• Present examples of how the MultiLine® 3620 IDS has been used in real-world scenarios to achieve sustainable outcomes.
• These could include environmental monitoring projects, water treatment plant optimization, or agricultural applications.

5. Conclusion:

• Summarize the key features and benefits of the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS for sustainable water quality monitoring.
• Emphasize its contribution to environmental protection, resource efficiency, and data-driven decision-making.
• Offer a call to action for wider adoption of this technology for a sustainable future.

Note: This is a conceptual outline. To create a full white paper, you would need to gather specific data, case studies, and expert opinions to support the claims and arguments presented. You could also contact WTW directly to inquire about any existing white papers or resources they might have available.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3620 ?

The WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS finds a wide range of applications in various industrial settings where water quality monitoring is critical for process optimization, environmental protection, and regulatory compliance. Here are some key industrial applications:

1. Manufacturing:

• Process water monitoring: Many manufacturing processes rely on water for cooling, cleaning, and as a component in the final product. The MultiLine® 3620 IDS can be used to monitor the quality of this water to ensure it meets specific requirements and prevent equipment damage. This includes industries like:
  • Textiles: Monitoring water quality in dyeing and finishing processes.
  • Electronics: Ensuring the purity of water used in semiconductor manufacturing.
  • Automotive: Monitoring water used in painting and coating processes.
• Wastewater monitoring: Manufacturing facilities generate wastewater that needs to be treated before discharge. The device can be used to monitor the quality of this wastewater to ensure it meets environmental regulations.

2. Power Generation:

• Cooling water monitoring: Power plants use large amounts of water for cooling. The MultiLine® 3620 IDS can be used to monitor the quality of this water to prevent scaling, corrosion, and fouling in cooling systems, ensuring efficient operation.
• Effluent monitoring: Power plants also need to monitor the quality of their wastewater discharge to comply with environmental regulations.

3. Chemical Industry:

• Process monitoring: The chemical industry uses water in various chemical reactions and processes. The device can be used to monitor the quality of this water to ensure optimal reaction conditions and product quality.
• Wastewater monitoring: Chemical plants generate complex wastewater streams that require careful monitoring. The MultiLine® 3620 IDS can be used to measure various parameters to ensure proper treatment and environmental protection.

4. Food and Beverage:

• Water quality in production: Water is a crucial ingredient in many food and beverage products. The device can be used to monitor the quality of water used in production to ensure product safety and quality.
• Wastewater monitoring: Food and beverage processing generates wastewater with high organic content. The MultiLine® 3620 IDS can be used to monitor this wastewater to ensure proper treatment and prevent pollution.

5. Mining:

• Water management: Mining operations can generate large volumes of wastewater that may contain heavy metals and other pollutants. The device can be used to monitor the quality of this water to ensure proper treatment and prevent environmental contamination.
• Environmental monitoring: Mining companies also need to monitor the water quality in surrounding areas to assess the impact of their operations on the environment.

Benefits of using the MultiLine® 3620 IDS in these industries:

• Improved efficiency: Real-time monitoring of water quality allows for quick adjustments in processes, optimizing resource use and reducing waste.
• Cost savings: By preventing equipment damage and ensuring efficient water use, industries can save on maintenance costs and resource consumption.
• Environmental protection: Accurate monitoring helps industries comply with environmental regulations and minimize their impact on water resources.
• Data-driven decision making: The data collected by the device can be used to identify trends, optimize processes, and make informed decisions about water management.

Overall, the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS plays a crucial role in promoting sustainable practices in various industries by enabling efficient water management, environmental protection, and regulatory compliance.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3620 ?

While specific research and development (R&D) information on the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS might not be publicly available in detail due to proprietary reasons, we can discuss the general trends and areas where R&D efforts are likely focused to enhance its sustainable technology aspects:

1. Enhanced Sensor Technology:

• Improved accuracy and reliability: R&D is likely focused on further improving the accuracy and reliability of the digital sensors used with the MultiLine® 3620 IDS. This could involve exploring new materials, sensing mechanisms, and signal processing techniques to minimize measurement errors and ensure consistent performance over time.
• Expanded parameter measurement: Research may be underway to expand the range of parameters that can be measured with the device. This could include adding sensors for emerging contaminants, heavy metals, or other specific substances relevant to environmental monitoring and industrial applications.
• Miniaturization and integration: Efforts may be directed towards miniaturizing the sensors and integrating them more seamlessly with the device. This could lead to smaller, more portable devices with enhanced functionality.

2. Wireless Communication and Data Management:

• Improved wireless connectivity: R&D may focus on enhancing the wireless communication capabilities of the device, such as increasing the range, data transfer speed, and security of wireless connections. This could involve exploring new wireless protocols and technologies.
• Advanced data analytics: Research may be directed towards developing advanced data analytics tools and software that can be integrated with the device. This could enable users to perform more sophisticated data analysis, identify trends, and make more informed decisions about water management.
• Cloud integration: Efforts may be underway to enable seamless data transfer and storage in the cloud. This would allow users to access and analyze data from anywhere, collaborate with others, and benefit from cloud-based services like data visualization and reporting.

3. Power Efficiency and Durability:

• Extended battery life: R&D may focus on improving the power efficiency of the device to extend battery life and reduce the need for frequent recharging. This could involve optimizing power consumption in the device’s circuitry and exploring new battery technologies.
• Enhanced durability: Efforts may be directed towards making the device even more durable and resistant to harsh environmental conditions. This could involve using more rugged materials, improving the device’s waterproofing and dustproofing, and enhancing its resistance to shock and vibration.

4. User Interface and Experience:

• Intuitive user interface: R&D may focus on improving the user interface of the device to make it more intuitive and user-friendly. This could involve simplifying the menu navigation, enhancing the display of information, and providing more helpful guidance to users.
• Customization options: Research may be directed towards providing users with more customization options, allowing them to configure the device and its features to suit their specific needs and preferences.

5. Sustainability Focus:

• Reduced environmental footprint: R&D efforts may be focused on minimizing the environmental footprint of the device throughout its lifecycle. This could involve using more sustainable materials, reducing energy consumption during manufacturing and use, and designing for easier recycling and disposal.

Overall, the R&D efforts for the WTW MultiLine® 3620 IDS are likely aimed at enhancing its performance, functionality, and sustainability to meet the evolving needs of users in various sectors. By focusing on sensor technology, wireless communication, data management, power efficiency, durability, user experience, and sustainability, the device can continue to be a valuable tool for water quality monitoring and environmental protection.

courtesy : Tech Evaluate

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.