Sustainable Technology of 3610

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3610 ?

Sustainable technology encompasses a wide range of innovations designed to minimize environmental impact and promote a more sustainable future. Here are some key aspects:

Core Principles

  • Resource Efficiency: Technologies that reduce the consumption of raw materials, energy, and water.
  • Pollution Reduction: Innovations that minimize or eliminate harmful emissions and waste.
  • Renewable Resources: Utilizing renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal.
  • Life Cycle Assessment: Considering the environmental impact of a technology throughout its entire life cycle, from production to disposal.

Examples of Sustainable Technologies

  • Renewable Energy Systems: Solar panels, wind turbines, and other technologies that harness clean energy.
  • Energy-Efficient Buildings: Designs and materials that reduce energy consumption for heating, cooling, and lighting.
  • Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, hybrid cars, and public transportation systems that reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Water Conservation: Technologies for efficient irrigation, water recycling, and desalination.
  • Waste Management: Innovations in recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy systems.
  • Precision Agriculture: Using technology to optimize crop production while minimizing resource use and environmental impact.

Benefits of Sustainable Technology

  • Environmental Protection: Reducing pollution, conserving resources, and mitigating climate change.
  • Economic Growth: Creating new industries, jobs, and markets for sustainable products and services.
  • Social Equity: Improving access to clean energy, water, and other essential resources.

Challenges and Opportunities

  • Cost and Accessibility: Making sustainable technologies affordable and accessible to all.
  • Infrastructure Development: Building the necessary infrastructure to support sustainable technologies.
  • Policy and Regulation: Creating policies that incentivize sustainable practices and investments.

The Role of Individuals

  • Informed Choices: Making conscious decisions to use sustainable products and services.
  • Energy Conservation: Reducing energy consumption at home and in the workplace.
  • Advocacy: Supporting policies and initiatives that promote sustainability.

By embracing sustainable technology, we can create a more environmentally responsible, economically prosperous, and socially equitable future for all.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3610 ?

Unfortunately, “Sustainable Technology of 3610” is a bit too vague for me to give you a specific answer. It’s like asking “What’s the best car?” without specifying what you need it for!

To help me understand what you’re looking for, could you tell me more about what you mean by “3610”? Is it:

  • A specific technology or product? (e.g., a model number, a type of equipment)
  • A field of study or industry? (e.g., a course code, a sector like agriculture or manufacturing)
  • A concept or idea? (e.g., a futuristic scenario, a theoretical framework)

Once I have a better understanding of the context, I can provide you with more relevant information about sustainable technologies related to it.

In the meantime, here are some general examples of sustainable technologies that might be relevant, depending on what “3610” refers to:

  • If it’s related to energy: Solar panels, wind turbines, energy-efficient appliances, smart grids, battery storage.
  • If it’s related to transportation: Electric vehicles, hybrid cars, fuel-efficient engines, public transportation systems, alternative fuels.
  • If it’s related to agriculture: Precision farming techniques, organic farming, vertical farming, hydroponics, water-efficient irrigation systems.
  • If it’s related to manufacturing: Sustainable materials, closed-loop production systems, energy-efficient processes, waste reduction and recycling technologies.
  • If it’s related to buildings: Green building materials, energy-efficient design, smart home technologies, rainwater harvesting systems, solar water heaters.

I’m ready to help you explore the world of sustainable technology! Just give me some more clues about what “3610” means to you.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3610 ?

It seems we’re still missing a key piece of information to understand what “Sustainable Technology of 3610” refers to.

However, I can tell you who, in general, needs and benefits from sustainable technology:

  • Individuals: We all need sustainable technology to maintain a healthy environment and a good quality of life. This includes access to clean energy, clean water, and sustainable transportation.
  • Businesses: Companies need sustainable technology to reduce their environmental impact, improve their brand reputation, and often to reduce costs in the long run. Many consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable products and services.
  • Governments: Governments need sustainable technology to meet environmental goals, create green jobs, and ensure a sustainable future for their citizens. They often play a role in incentivizing the development and adoption of sustainable technology.
  • Communities: Communities need sustainable technology to build resilient infrastructure, improve access to resources, and create a sense of environmental stewardship.

Essentially, everyone has a stake in sustainable technology. It’s not just about environmentalism; it’s about ensuring a healthy planet and a thriving society for current and future generations.

Perhaps you could provide some more context about “3610”? Knowing if it’s a course code, a product name, or something else entirely would help me give you a more specific answer.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3610 ?

You’re right to ask “when” sustainable technology is needed! The answer is: Now, and increasingly so in the future.

Here’s why:

  • Urgent Environmental Challenges: We face pressing issues like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. Sustainable technology offers solutions to mitigate these problems.
  • Growing Population: The global population is increasing, putting more strain on resources and the environment. Sustainable technology helps us meet the needs of a growing population without compromising the planet.
  • Economic Opportunities: Sustainable technology drives innovation, creates new jobs, and opens up new markets. It’s not just environmentally responsible, it’s economically smart.
  • Improving Quality of Life: Sustainable technology can improve access to clean energy, water, and sanitation, leading to better health and well-being for people around the world.

However, “when” also depends on the specific context:

  • Immediate Action: Some sustainable technologies, like renewable energy systems, are needed urgently to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change.
  • Long-Term Planning: Other sustainable technologies, like sustainable agriculture practices, require long-term planning and investment to ensure food security for future generations.
  • Continuous Development: Sustainable technology is not a static field. We need continuous research and development to create even more innovative and effective solutions.

In short, the need for sustainable technology is now, it will be even greater in the future, and it requires action on multiple fronts.

It seems we’re still on a quest to understand what “Sustainable Technology of 3610” means. If you can provide any more details about what “3610” refers to, I’m eager to help you explore the specific sustainable technologies that might be relevant.

courtesy : Monash University Faculty of Science

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3610 ?

Sustainable technology is needed everywhere. It’s not limited to a specific geographic location or industry. The need for sustainable practices and technologies spans the globe. However, the specific types of sustainable technology that are most needed can vary depending on local contexts. Here’s a breakdown:

  • Globally: We need global cooperation and investment in areas like renewable energy, climate change mitigation, and sustainable development goals. These are challenges that transcend national borders.
  • Nationally: Each country needs to develop its own sustainable technology strategies based on its specific resources, challenges, and priorities. This might include investing in renewable energy infrastructure, promoting energy efficiency, or supporting sustainable agriculture.
  • Regionally: Different regions within a country may have unique needs. Coastal areas might focus on protecting against rising sea levels, while arid regions might prioritize water conservation.
  • Locally: Cities and communities need sustainable technology to address local challenges like waste management, transportation, and air pollution. This could involve investing in public transportation, promoting cycling and walking, or implementing green building codes.
  • Industrially: Every industry, from manufacturing to agriculture to transportation, needs to adopt sustainable technologies to reduce its environmental footprint. This could involve using sustainable materials, reducing energy consumption, or minimizing waste.
  • Individually: We all have a role to play in adopting sustainable practices in our daily lives, from conserving energy and water to making sustainable consumer choices.

So, while the general need for sustainable technology is universal, the specific technologies and their implementation will vary depending on the context.

We’re still trying to figure out what “3610” refers to. If you can give me any clues, like if it’s a product name, a course code, or related to a specific field, I can try to narrow down where that specific sustainable technology might be needed.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3610 ?

How sustainable technology is required depends heavily on what “3610” refers to. Since we still don’t know what that is, I can give you general ways sustainable technology is implemented and integrated into various aspects of life:

General Approaches to Implementing Sustainable Technology:

  • Policy and Regulation: Governments play a crucial role by setting standards, offering incentives, and creating regulations that encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies. Examples include carbon pricing, renewable energy mandates, and building codes.
  • Market Mechanisms: Creating market incentives, such as tax breaks or subsidies, can make sustainable technologies more economically attractive. Carbon trading and cap-and-trade systems are other examples.
  • Research and Development: Investing in research and development is essential for creating new and improved sustainable technologies. This includes funding for universities, research institutions, and private companies.
  • Education and Awareness: Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technologies is crucial for driving adoption. This can involve public campaigns, educational programs, and community outreach.
  • Collaboration and Partnerships: Addressing sustainability challenges requires collaboration between governments, businesses, NGOs, and individuals. Partnerships can help to share knowledge, resources, and expertise.
  • Investment and Financing: Significant investment is needed to develop and deploy sustainable technologies. This includes public funding, private investment, and innovative financing mechanisms like green bonds.
  • Technological Innovation: Continuous innovation is key to developing more efficient, cost-effective, and accessible sustainable technologies. This includes advancements in areas like renewable energy, energy storage, and materials science.
  • Life Cycle Assessment: Considering the environmental impact of a technology throughout its entire life cycle, from production to disposal, is essential for ensuring true sustainability.

If you can tell me anything more about “3610,” such as if it’s a product, a concept, a field of study, or anything else, I can give you more specific examples of how sustainable technology might be required or implemented in that context. For instance, if it’s a type of building material, I could talk about sustainable sourcing and manufacturing. If it’s related to agriculture, I could discuss sustainable farming practices. The more information you can provide, the better I can assist you.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3610 ?

It seems we’re still facing a bit of a mystery with “Sustainable Technology of 3610”! I’m ready to explore case studies, but to make sure they’re relevant, I need a little more information about what “3610” refers to.

However, I can offer some examples of case studies in sustainable technology that might spark some ideas or be helpful in a general sense:

1. Renewable Energy Integration:

  • Case Study: The Hornsea Project Two offshore wind farm in the UK. This project demonstrates the large-scale deployment of offshore wind power and its contribution to decarbonizing electricity generation. It highlights the technical challenges, environmental considerations, and economic benefits of large-scale renewable energy projects.

2. Sustainable Agriculture:

  • Case Study: The use of precision agriculture technologies in the Netherlands. This case study explores how technologies like GPS, sensors, and data analytics are used to optimize crop production, reduce water and fertilizer use, and minimize environmental impact in agriculture.

3. Green Building Design:

  • Case Study: The construction of the Bullitt Center in Seattle, USA. This building is designed to be self-sufficient in energy, water, and waste disposal. It showcases innovative green building technologies and practices, such as solar panels, rainwater harvesting, and composting toilets.

4. Circular Economy Initiatives:

  • Case Study: The “Zero Waste Scotland” program. This initiative focuses on promoting a circular economy model by reducing waste, increasing recycling rates, and encouraging the reuse of materials. It demonstrates how a national-level approach can drive systemic change towards a more sustainable economy.

5. Sustainable Transportation:

  • Case Study: The development of electric bus fleets in cities like Shenzhen, China. This case study examines the adoption of electric buses as a sustainable alternative to traditional diesel buses, highlighting the benefits in terms of reduced emissions and improved air quality.

These are just a few examples, and there are many other fascinating case studies in sustainable technology across various sectors.

If you can provide any clues about “3610,” I’d be happy to delve into more specific case studies that might be relevant to your area of interest. Perhaps it’s related to a particular industry, a specific technology, or a certain region? The more information you can share, the better I can assist you in finding the perfect case study!

COURTEY : Top Picks Network

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3610 ?

I understand you’re looking for a white paper on “Sustainable Technology of 3610.” Unfortunately, without knowing what “3610” refers to, I can’t point you to a specific document. It’s like searching for a book without knowing the title or author!

However, I can offer some general advice on finding white papers about sustainable technology and suggest some potential search strategies:

General Search Strategies for White Papers on Sustainable Technology:

  1. Be Specific: The more specific your search terms, the better your results will be. Instead of just “sustainable technology,” try searching for terms like “sustainable building materials,” “renewable energy integration,” or “circular economy in manufacturing.”
  2. Use Advanced Search Operators: Use search operators like quotation marks (for exact phrases), the minus sign (to exclude certain terms), and the asterisk (as a wildcard) to refine your searches. For example, “sustainable agriculture” -organic could exclude results about organic farming.
  3. Explore Industry Associations: Many industry associations publish white papers on sustainable practices and technologies relevant to their specific sector. For example, the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) might have white papers on solar energy, while the US Green Building Council (USGBC) might have resources on green building.
  4. Check Research Institutions and Universities: Universities and research institutions often publish white papers and reports on sustainable technology. Look at the websites of institutions that specialize in environmental science, engineering, or sustainable development.
  5. Look at Government Websites: Government agencies often publish white papers and reports on sustainable technology policies and initiatives. For example, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the US has numerous resources on environmental sustainability.
  6. Search Company Websites: Many companies involved in sustainable technology publish white papers to showcase their expertise and solutions.
  7. Use White Paper Search Engines: There are specialized search engines that focus specifically on white papers. Try searching on these platforms.

If you can tell me anything about what “3610” refers to, I can help you narrow down your search and suggest more specific resources. For example, is it a product name, a course code, a company name, a material, a process, or something else entirely? Even a small clue could make a big difference!

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3610 ?

While I’m still eager to learn more about what “3610” refers to, I can definitely discuss the industrial applications of sustainable technology in general. Here are some key areas where industries are adopting sustainable practices and technologies:

1. Manufacturing:

  • Sustainable Materials: Industries are increasingly using recycled, renewable, and biodegradable materials in their products. This reduces reliance on virgin resources and minimizes waste.
  • Energy Efficiency: Manufacturers are implementing energy-efficient processes, equipment, and lighting to reduce their energy consumption and carbon footprint.
  • Waste Reduction and Recycling: Industries are adopting closed-loop systems to minimize waste generation and maximize recycling and reuse of materials.
  • Sustainable Supply Chains: Companies are working with their suppliers to ensure that their entire supply chain is sustainable, from sourcing raw materials to transportation and distribution.

2. Energy:

  • Renewable Energy: Industries are investing in renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal to power their operations and reduce their reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Smart Grids: Companies are using smart grid technologies to optimize energy distribution and consumption, reducing waste and improving efficiency.
  • Energy Storage: Industries are exploring energy storage solutions to store renewable energy and ensure a reliable power supply.

3. Agriculture:

  • Precision Farming: Farmers are using technology like GPS, sensors, and data analytics to optimize crop production, reduce water and fertilizer use, and minimize environmental impact.
  • Organic Farming: Industries are adopting organic farming practices to reduce the use of pesticides and other harmful chemicals.
  • Vertical Farming: Companies are exploring vertical farming techniques to grow crops in urban areas, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.

4. Construction:

  • Green Building Materials: Industries are using sustainable building materials like recycled wood, bamboo, and recycled concrete to reduce the environmental impact of construction.
  • Energy-Efficient Buildings: Companies are designing and constructing buildings that are energy-efficient, using features like solar panels, green roofs, and efficient insulation.
  • Waste Management: Construction companies are implementing waste management strategies to reduce construction waste and recycle materials.

5. Transportation:

  • Electric Vehicles: Industries are adopting electric vehicles for their fleets and encouraging employees to use electric vehicles by providing charging infrastructure.
  • Alternative Fuels: Companies are exploring alternative fuels like biofuels and hydrogen to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Sustainable Logistics: Industries are optimizing their logistics and transportation operations to reduce fuel consumption and emissions.

These are just a few examples of the many industrial applications of sustainable technology. By adopting sustainable practices and technologies, industries can reduce their environmental impact, improve their efficiency, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

I’m still hoping to learn more about “3610” so I can provide more specific examples. Perhaps it relates to a particular industry or technology? Any information you can share would be greatly appreciated!

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3610 ?

You’re asking a great question! Research and development (R&D) is absolutely crucial for advancing sustainable technology. It’s how we create new solutions, improve existing ones, and make sustainable practices more efficient and accessible.

Here are some key areas of R&D in sustainable technology:

1. Renewable Energy:

  • Improving Efficiency: Researchers are constantly working to increase the efficiency of solar panels, wind turbines, and other renewable energy technologies. This means generating more energy from the same amount of sunlight or wind.
  • Reducing Costs: R&D efforts are focused on reducing the cost of renewable energy technologies to make them more competitive with traditional fossil fuels.
  • Energy Storage: Developing better ways to store renewable energy is essential for ensuring a reliable and consistent power supply. This includes research on batteries, pumped hydro storage, and other energy storage solutions.
  • Grid Integration: Researchers are working on ways to integrate renewable energy sources into existing power grids more effectively. This includes developing smart grid technologies that can manage fluctuating energy supplies from solar and wind power.

2. Sustainable Materials:

  • Developing New Materials: Scientists are researching and developing new sustainable materials that are biodegradable, recyclable, or made from renewable resources. This includes exploring materials like bioplastics, advanced composites, and innovative uses for recycled materials.
  • Improving Existing Materials: Researchers are working to improve the sustainability of existing materials, such as making concrete production less carbon-intensive or finding ways to recycle plastics more efficiently.

3. Resource Efficiency:

  • Reducing Water Consumption: R&D efforts are focused on developing technologies and practices that reduce water consumption in agriculture, industry, and households. This includes research on efficient irrigation systems, water recycling technologies, and drought-resistant crops.
  • Minimizing Waste: Researchers are working on ways to minimize waste generation and improve recycling rates. This includes developing new recycling technologies, designing products for disassembly and reuse, and promoting circular economy models.

4. Pollution Reduction:

  • Carbon Capture and Storage: Scientists are researching technologies to capture carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and industrial facilities and store them underground.
  • Air and Water Purification: R&D efforts are focused on developing more effective and affordable technologies for removing pollutants from air and water.

5. Sustainable Agriculture:

  • Improving Crop Yields: Researchers are working on ways to increase crop yields sustainably, without relying on harmful pesticides or excessive fertilizer use. This includes research on precision agriculture, crop breeding, and soil health.
  • Reducing Environmental Impact: R&D efforts are focused on reducing the environmental impact of agriculture, such as minimizing water use, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and protecting biodiversity.

6. Cross-Cutting Areas:

  • Artificial Intelligence: AI is being used to optimize energy use in buildings, improve transportation efficiency, and manage resources more effectively.
  • Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology is being applied to develop more efficient solar cells, create new sustainable materials, and improve water purification technologies.

To make this more specific to “Sustainable Technology of 3610,” I still need some information about what “3610” refers to. Is it a specific technology, a product, an industry, or something else? Knowing this will help me provide more targeted examples of R&D efforts.

For example, if “3610” refers to a type of material, I could discuss research into making that material more sustainable. If it’s a type of energy technology, I could talk about R&D efforts to improve its efficiency or reduce its cost. Please share any details you can!

courtesy ” Tech Evaluate

References

  1. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”Sustainability Science14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681Pdoi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5ISSN 1862-4065 Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075Rdoi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3ISSN 1187-7863S2CID 146790960.
  3. Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”Sustainability2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424hdl:10535/6499ISSN 2071-1050 Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1OCLC 1124780147.
  6. Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”Sustainability2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”Environmental Science & Policy112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236Vdoi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016PMC 7330600PMID 32834777.
  12. Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”Sustainability9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165hdl:10453/90953ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”Global Environmental Change68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222Adoi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”Society & Natural Resources27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777Bdoi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467ISSN 0894-1920S2CID 67783261.
  21. Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better FutureStockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011S2CID 248881465.
  22. Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”Annual Review of Environment and Resources41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039ISSN 1543-5938S2CID 156534921.
  23. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”Papers in Applied Geography2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365Hdoi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222ISSN 2375-4931S2CID 132458202.
  24. Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”Global Policy14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160ISSN 1758-5880S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”Resource Management and Optimization8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”Environmental Conservation14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101Bdoi:10.1017/S0376892900011449ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”Sustainability Science16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949Edoi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5PMC 7960882PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”BioScience67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125hdl:11336/71342ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”Nature415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23Cdoi:10.1038/415023aISSN 0028-0836PMID 11780095S2CID 9743349.
  53. Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”Sustainable Development13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon PressISBN 0-8070-4708-2OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”Sustainability8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”Sustainability11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”Geography Compass4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”Journal of Cleaner Production140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42Mdoi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”Sustainability8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: RoutledgeISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”Environment, Development and Sustainability15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225Mdoi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77Vdoi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”Ecological Economics8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103Pdoi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”Ecological Economics17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147Cdoi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3OCLC 951915998.
  77. Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: RoutledgeISBN 9781315765747.
  79. Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”Sustainability11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”Environmental Science & Technology56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510Pdoi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158ISSN 0013-936XPMC 8811958PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”Nature Communications11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107Wdoi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-yISSN 2041-1723PMC 7305220PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island PressISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random HouseISBN 978-1-84794-138-1OCLC 974194745.
  96. Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”Earth System Governance11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131Pdoi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131 Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”PNAS Nexus3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106PMC 10986754PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”Environmental Research Letters15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003Hdoi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842aISSN 1748-9326S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island PressISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4OCLC 704557307.
  107. Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”PLOS Biology10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405ISSN 1544-9173PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11Gdoi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”Journal of Cleaner Production314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973Ndoi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”Global Discourse7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”Sustainability15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »