Sustainable Technology of 3590 ?

79 / 100

It seems you’re asking about the sustainable technology features of the Dell Precision 3590 laptop. Here’s a breakdown of its key sustainability aspects:

Recycled and Renewable Materials: The laptop incorporates various recycled materials like post-consumer recycled plastic, ocean-bound plastic, bio-based plastic, recycled cobalt, and reclaimed carbon fiber. This reduces the need for virgin resources and helps divert waste from landfills and oceans.
Recycled Packaging: The Precision 3590 ships in packaging made from 100% recycled or renewable content, minimizing environmental impact and promoting circularity.
Energy Efficiency: The laptop is designed to meet energy efficiency standards, contributing to lower energy consumption during use.
Environmental Certifications: The Precision 3590 has achieved the EPEAT Gold with Climate+ designation, indicating its adherence to industry best practices for decarbonization and environmental performance. It is also ENERGY STAR® 8.0 and TCO certified.

These features demonstrate Dell’s commitment to sustainability by reducing the laptop’s environmental footprint throughout its lifecycle, from material sourcing and manufacturing to packaging and energy use.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3590 ?

You’re asking about what makes the Dell Precision 3590 a sustainable piece of technology. Here’s a breakdown of its key features in that area:

Recycled and Renewable Materials: Dell incorporates a variety of recycled materials into the laptop’s construction. This includes things like:
- Post-consumer recycled plastic (plastic from used products)
- Ocean-bound plastic (plastic rescued from areas where it could end up in the ocean)
- Bio-based plastic (plastic made from renewable resources like plants)
- Recycled cobalt (used in the battery)
- Reclaimed carbon fiber (carbon fiber that’s been recycled from other uses)
By using these materials, Dell reduces the need for newly sourced resources and helps to keep waste out of landfills and the environment.
Recycled Packaging: The Precision 3590 is shipped in packaging that’s made entirely from recycled or renewable materials. This helps to minimize the environmental impact of the packaging and promotes a circular economy where materials are reused.
Energy Efficiency: The laptop is designed to meet energy efficiency standards. This means it consumes less power during use, which can lead to lower electricity bills and a reduced carbon footprint.
Environmental Certifications: The Precision 3590 has earned several environmental certifications, including:
- EPEAT Gold with Climate+ designation: This recognizes the laptop’s adherence to high standards for environmental performance, including decarbonization efforts.
- ENERGY STAR® 8.0: This certification indicates that the laptop meets strict energy efficiency guidelines set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
- TCO Certified: This certification covers a wide range of sustainability criteria, including environmental and social responsibility.

These features all contribute to making the Dell Precision 3590 a more sustainable technology choice. By focusing on recycled materials, energy efficiency, and responsible packaging, Dell aims to minimize the laptop’s environmental impact throughout its lifecycle.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3590 ?

The Dell Precision 3590’s sustainable technology features are beneficial for a wide range of users and organizations, but some may find them particularly important:

Environmentally Conscious Individuals: Users who prioritize sustainability and want to reduce their environmental impact will appreciate the laptop’s use of recycled and renewable materials, energy efficiency, and eco-friendly packaging.
Businesses with Sustainability Goals: Companies that have committed to reducing their carbon footprint and promoting environmental responsibility can use the Precision 3590 to help achieve those goals. It aligns with corporate sustainability initiatives and demonstrates a commitment to eco-friendly practices.
Organizations Seeking Environmental Certifications: Businesses aiming for certifications like EPEAT or ENERGY STAR can benefit from using the Precision 3590, as it meets the criteria for these certifications.
Government Agencies and Educational Institutions: These organizations often have sustainability mandates and may be required to purchase products that meet certain environmental standards. The Precision 3590’s certifications and eco-friendly features make it a suitable choice.
IT Departments Focused on Reducing E-waste: The laptop’s use of recycled materials and recyclable packaging can help IT departments minimize e-waste and contribute to a circular economy.

Ultimately, anyone who cares about the environment and wants to make more sustainable technology choices can benefit from the Dell Precision 3590’s features. It offers a balance of performance and sustainability, making it a good option for a wide range of users and organizations.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3590 ?

You’re asking about the situations where the sustainable technology features of the Dell Precision 3590 are particularly important. Here are some key times when these features become especially relevant:

Procurement Decisions: When organizations are making purchasing decisions, especially for large deployments of laptops, the sustainability features of the Precision 3590 become a crucial factor. It allows them to meet their own sustainability targets and demonstrate a commitment to responsible sourcing.
Tenders and RFPs: In many government and institutional tenders, environmental criteria are increasingly being included. The Precision 3590’s certifications and eco-friendly design can give it an edge in these competitive situations.
Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Companies that are required to report on their environmental impact can use the Precision 3590 as evidence of their efforts to reduce e-waste and promote sustainable technology.
Employee Awareness and Engagement: When companies want to engage their employees in sustainability initiatives, providing them with eco-friendly devices like the Precision 3590 can be a tangible way to demonstrate their commitment and encourage responsible behavior.
End-of-Life Management: When it’s time to replace the laptops, the use of recycled materials and recyclable packaging makes it easier to dispose of them responsibly and minimize environmental impact.
Brand Image and Reputation: For companies that prioritize sustainability, using the Precision 3590 can enhance their brand image and reputation as an environmentally responsible organization.

Essentially, the sustainable technology features of the Dell Precision 3590 are important whenever organizations or individuals want to:

Reduce their environmental footprint
Meet sustainability goals and targets
Comply with environmental regulations
Enhance their brand image
Promote responsible technology use

By considering these factors, organizations can make informed decisions about when and how to leverage the sustainable features of the Precision 3590 to achieve their environmental and business objectives.

COURTESY : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3590 ?

You’re asking about the contexts or situations where the sustainable technology features of the Dell Precision 3590 are particularly important. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Organizational Contexts:

Government Agencies: Many governments have strict procurement policies that prioritize environmentally friendly products. The Precision 3590’s certifications (EPEAT, ENERGY STAR) and sustainable materials make it a strong contender.
Educational Institutions: Schools and universities are increasingly focused on sustainability. The laptop aligns with their goals of reducing environmental impact and promoting responsible technology use.
Corporations with ESG Goals: Companies with strong Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) commitments often seek out sustainable IT equipment. The Precision 3590 helps them meet their targets and demonstrate their dedication to sustainability.
Non-profit Organizations: Non-profits focused on environmental issues will naturally gravitate towards products with a lower environmental footprint.

2. Situational Contexts:

Large-Scale Deployments: When organizations are purchasing a large number of laptops, the cumulative environmental impact is significant. Choosing a sustainable option like the Precision 3590 makes a big difference.
Tenders and RFPs: In competitive bidding situations, especially those with a focus on sustainability, the Precision 3590’s features can give it a competitive advantage.
Sustainability Reporting: Companies that are required to report on their environmental performance can use the laptop as an example of their efforts to reduce e-waste and promote sustainable technology.
Employee Engagement: Providing employees with eco-friendly devices can be a way to raise awareness about sustainability and encourage responsible behavior.

3. Geographic Contexts:

Regions with Strong Environmental Regulations: In areas with strict environmental laws, using products that meet those standards is essential. The Precision 3590’s certifications can help organizations comply with local regulations.
Countries with a Focus on Circular Economy: Nations that prioritize waste reduction and resource reuse will favor products designed with recycled materials and recyclable packaging.

In essence, the Dell Precision 3590’s sustainable technology is most relevant in situations where:

Environmental impact is a key consideration.
Organizations have sustainability goals or mandates.
Compliance with environmental regulations is necessary.
There is a desire to promote responsible technology use.

By understanding these contexts, organizations and individuals can make informed decisions about when and where to leverage the sustainable features of the Precision 3590.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3590 ?

It seems like you’re asking about how the sustainable technology features of the Dell Precision 3590 are implemented or achieved. Here’s a breakdown of how Dell incorporates sustainability into this laptop:

1. Materials:

Recycled Plastics: Dell uses post-consumer recycled plastic (PCR) in various components of the laptop. This means plastic that has been used in other products, recycled, and then used again in the 3590. This reduces the need for new plastic production and helps divert plastic waste from landfills.
Ocean-Bound Plastic: Dell also incorporates ocean-bound plastic, which is plastic waste collected from areas at risk of entering the ocean. This helps to address the growing problem of plastic pollution in our oceans.
Bio-Based Plastics: Some parts of the laptop may be made from bio-based plastics, which are plastics derived from renewable resources like plants. This reduces reliance on fossil fuels for plastic production.
Recycled Cobalt: The battery in the Precision 3590 contains recycled cobalt. Cobalt is a key component of batteries, and using recycled cobalt helps to conserve this valuable resource and reduce the environmental impact of mining for new cobalt.
Reclaimed Carbon Fiber: In some configurations, reclaimed carbon fiber is used. This is carbon fiber that has been recovered from other uses (like aerospace manufacturing) and repurposed in the laptop. This reduces waste and the energy needed to produce new carbon fiber.

2. Manufacturing and Packaging:

Energy Efficiency: The laptop is designed to meet energy efficiency standards, which means it consumes less power during use. This reduces energy consumption and lowers the associated environmental impact.
Recycled Packaging: The Precision 3590 ships in packaging made from 100% recycled or renewable content. This minimizes the environmental impact of packaging and promotes a circular economy where materials are reused.

3. Certifications and Standards:

EPEAT Gold with Climate+: This certification recognizes the laptop’s adherence to high environmental standards, including criteria for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
ENERGY STAR 8.0: This certification indicates that the laptop meets strict energy efficiency guidelines set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
TCO Certified: This certification covers a wide range of sustainability criteria, including environmental and social responsibility.

In summary, Dell achieves the sustainable technology features of the Precision 3590 through:

Careful selection of recycled, renewable, and responsibly sourced materials.
Energy-efficient design and manufacturing processes.
Environmentally friendly packaging.
Adherence to recognized environmental certifications and standards.

By combining these approaches, Dell aims to minimize the environmental impact of the Precision 3590 throughout its lifecycle, from material sourcing and manufacturing to use and end-of-life management.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3590 ?

While there isn’t a specific, publicly available case study dedicated solely to the sustainable technology of the Dell Precision 3590, we can piece together a sort of case study based on the information Dell provides and how it applies to real-world scenarios:

Case Study: Integrating Sustainability with Performance – The Dell Precision 3590

Challenge: Organizations across various sectors face increasing pressure to reduce their environmental footprint while maintaining high productivity levels. This includes IT departments, which are responsible for procuring and managing a significant amount of technology.

Solution: The Dell Precision 3590 addresses this challenge by offering a powerful workstation with a strong focus on sustainability. It demonstrates how businesses can achieve high performance without compromising their environmental goals.

Key Features and Benefits:

Reduced reliance on virgin resources: The laptop’s use of recycled and renewable materials, such as post-consumer recycled plastic, ocean-bound plastic, and bio-based plastic, minimizes the need for new resources and helps to divert waste from landfills and oceans. This aligns with the growing trend of circular economy principles.
Lower environmental impact: The energy-efficient design of the Precision 3590, along with its ENERGY STAR 8.0 certification, contributes to lower energy consumption during use. This translates to reduced electricity bills and a smaller carbon footprint for organizations.
Responsible end-of-life management: The use of recycled materials and recyclable packaging makes it easier for organizations to dispose of the laptop responsibly at the end of its life. This helps to minimize e-waste and promote a more sustainable approach to technology lifecycle management.
Enhanced brand image: By choosing the Precision 3590, organizations can demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and enhance their brand image as environmentally responsible entities. This can be a valuable asset in attracting customers, employees, and investors who prioritize sustainability.

Real-World Applications:

Government agencies: Government bodies can use the Precision 3590 to meet their sustainability mandates and demonstrate responsible use of taxpayer money.
Corporations: Companies with ESG goals can integrate the laptop into their IT infrastructure to reduce their environmental impact and showcase their commitment to sustainability.
Creative professionals: Designers, engineers, and other creative professionals can leverage the laptop’s high performance while minimizing their environmental footprint.

Conclusion:

The Dell Precision 3590 serves as a practical example of how sustainable technology can be integrated into high-performance devices. By prioritizing recycled materials, energy efficiency, and responsible packaging, Dell demonstrates that businesses can achieve their productivity goals while contributing to a more sustainable future. This approach is becoming increasingly important as organizations and individuals alike recognize the need to address environmental challenges.

While this isn’t a formal case study with specific metrics and data, it highlights how the Precision 3590’s features can translate into real-world benefits for organizations and individuals seeking to balance performance with sustainability.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3590 ?

I can’t provide a formal, published white paper on the Dell Precision 3590’s sustainability features. Dell’s website and marketing materials highlight these features, but a full white paper is usually a more in-depth, technical document. Such a document might be produced internally by Dell, but it’s not something I have access to.

However, I can give you the structure and content that would likely be included in a white paper about the 3590’s sustainability, drawing on the information Dell provides:

Title: Balancing Performance and Planet: The Sustainable Technology of the Dell Precision 3590

Abstract: This white paper examines the Dell Precision 3590’s commitment to sustainable technology, detailing the features and initiatives that minimize its environmental impact throughout its lifecycle. It explores the use of recycled and renewable materials, energy efficiency, responsible packaging, and certifications, demonstrating how the 3590 offers a powerful yet environmentally conscious computing solution.

1. Introduction:

The increasing importance of sustainable IT practices.
The challenges of balancing performance with environmental responsibility.
Introducing the Dell Precision 3590 as a solution.
Target audience for the white paper (e.g., IT professionals, sustainability officers).

2. Materials and Design:

Recycled and Renewable Content: Detailed explanation of the specific recycled and renewable materials used (PCR plastic, ocean-bound plastic, bio-based plastic, recycled cobalt, reclaimed carbon fiber). Quantifying the percentage of recycled content where possible.
Design for Durability: How the laptop’s design contributes to longevity and reduces the need for frequent replacements.
Material Sourcing: Discussion of Dell’s responsible sourcing practices for materials used in the 3590.

3. Energy Efficiency:

Power Management Features: Description of the laptop’s energy-saving features and technologies.
Compliance with Energy Standards: Explanation of certifications like ENERGY STAR and their significance.
Real-World Energy Consumption Scenarios: Potentially including data or estimates on typical energy usage.

4. Packaging and End-of-Life:

Sustainable Packaging: Details about the recycled and renewable materials used in the packaging.
Recycling and Disposal: Information on Dell’s recycling programs and recommendations for responsible disposal of the laptop at the end of its life.

5. Environmental Certifications and Standards:

EPEAT: Explanation of the EPEAT rating system and the 3590’s specific level of certification (Gold with Climate+).
TCO Certified: Details about the TCO certification and how the 3590 meets its criteria.
Other Relevant Certifications: Any other relevant environmental or sustainability certifications.

6. Dell’s Sustainability Initiatives:

Overview of Dell’s broader commitment to sustainability.
Information about Dell’s recycling programs, carbon reduction goals, and other environmental initiatives.

7. Conclusion:

Summary of the key sustainable features of the Precision 3590.
The benefits of choosing a sustainable IT solution.
Call to action (e.g., adopting sustainable IT practices).

8. Appendix (Optional):

Technical specifications of the Precision 3590.
Links to further resources on Dell’s sustainability initiatives.

This outline provides a framework for what a white paper on the Dell Precision 3590’s sustainability might cover. You can use this information to guide your own research and evaluation of the laptop’s environmental credentials. Remember to always refer to Dell’s official website for the most up-to-date and accurate information.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3590 ?

You’re asking about how the Dell Precision 3590’s sustainability features apply in industrial settings. Here’s how those features can be particularly relevant in industrial environments:

1. Meeting Sustainability Targets:

Manufacturing: Many industrial companies have set ambitious sustainability goals, including reducing their carbon footprint and minimizing waste. The 3590’s use of recycled and renewable materials, along with its energy efficiency, can help these companies achieve their targets.
Supply Chain: Increasingly, businesses are looking at the sustainability of their entire supply chain. Choosing laptops like the 3590 for their workforce demonstrates a commitment to responsible sourcing and can contribute to a more sustainable supply chain overall.

2. Durability and Longevity:

Harsh Environments: Industrial settings often involve harsh conditions, such as extreme temperatures, dust, and vibrations. The 3590’s robust design and durable construction can ensure that it can withstand these challenges, reducing the need for frequent replacements and minimizing e-waste.
Long-Term Use: Industrial equipment is often used for extended periods. The 3590’s focus on longevity, through durable design and quality components, aligns with this need for long-term use, reducing the environmental impact associated with frequent upgrades.

3. Energy Efficiency and Cost Savings:

24/7 Operation: In some industrial settings, computers operate continuously. The 3590’s energy-efficient design can lead to significant cost savings over time by reducing electricity consumption.
Reduced Downtime: Energy-efficient devices tend to generate less heat, which can contribute to improved reliability and reduced downtime. This is crucial in industrial environments where downtime can be very costly.

4. Compliance and Certifications:

Environmental Regulations: Some industries have strict environmental regulations that they must comply with. The 3590’s certifications (EPEAT, ENERGY STAR) can help companies meet these requirements.
Industry Standards: Certain industries may have specific sustainability standards or certifications that they adhere to. The 3590’s features can help companies meet these industry-specific requirements.

5. Employee Engagement:

Sustainability Initiatives: Many industrial companies are implementing employee engagement programs focused on sustainability. Providing employees with eco-friendly devices like the 3590 can be a tangible way to demonstrate the company’s commitment to sustainability and encourage responsible behavior.

Specific Industrial Applications:

Manufacturing: Design, engineering, and production planning.
Energy: Resource exploration, energy management, and data analysis.
Construction: Project management, site surveys, and building information modeling (BIM).
Logistics: Supply chain management, warehouse operations, and transportation optimization.

In these and other industrial applications, the Dell Precision 3590’s combination of performance and sustainability features makes it a suitable choice for companies looking to improve their environmental performance while maintaining productivity and efficiency.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3590 ?

You’re interested in the research and development that goes into making the Dell Precision 3590 more sustainable. While Dell doesn’t release detailed reports on the R&D process for specific models, we can infer the types of research and development that likely contribute to its sustainability features:

1. Materials Science and Engineering:

Recycled and Renewable Materials: Researchers explore and test various recycled and renewable materials to determine their suitability for use in laptop components. This includes evaluating their durability, performance, and compatibility with existing manufacturing processes.
Bio-Based Plastics: Scientists may be involved in developing and refining bio-based plastics derived from renewable resources. This involves finding sustainable sources for these materials and optimizing their properties for use in electronic devices.
Closed-Loop Recycling: Dell likely invests in research on closed-loop recycling systems, where materials from end-of-life products are recovered and reused in new products. This requires developing efficient methods for separating and processing materials, as well as ensuring the quality and consistency of recycled materials.

2. Design and Manufacturing:

Design for Durability: Engineers work on designing laptops that are durable and long-lasting, reducing the need for frequent replacements. This involves selecting robust materials, optimizing the structural design, and conducting rigorous testing to ensure reliability.
Energy Efficiency: Researchers explore ways to improve the energy efficiency of laptop components, such as processors, displays, and storage devices. This involves developing new technologies and optimizing existing ones to reduce power consumption without compromising performance.
Sustainable Manufacturing Processes: Dell likely invests in research on more sustainable manufacturing processes, such as reducing waste, minimizing energy use, and using less harmful chemicals.

3. Packaging and End-of-Life:

Sustainable Packaging: Researchers explore and test different types of recycled and renewable materials for use in laptop packaging. This involves finding materials that are protective, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly.
Recycling and Disposal Technologies: Dell may be involved in research on improved recycling and disposal technologies for electronic devices. This includes developing methods for recovering valuable materials from end-of-life products and reducing the environmental impact of e-waste.

4. Environmental Certifications and Standards:

Compliance and Advocacy: Dell likely participates in the development and refinement of environmental certifications and standards, such as EPEAT and ENERGY STAR. This involves working with industry partners and regulatory bodies to establish meaningful criteria for sustainable technology.

5. Life Cycle Assessment:

Environmental Impact Analysis: Dell probably conducts life cycle assessments (LCAs) to evaluate the environmental impact of its products throughout their entire life cycle, from material extraction to manufacturing, use, and end-of-life management. This helps to identify areas where improvements can be made to reduce environmental impact.

Collaboration and Partnerships:

Industry Collaboration: Dell likely collaborates with other companies, research institutions, and non-profit organizations to advance sustainable technology. This may involve joint research projects, sharing best practices, and participating in industry initiatives.

It’s important to remember that research and development in sustainable technology is an ongoing process. Dell and other companies are continuously working to improve the environmental performance of their products and contribute to a more sustainable future.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.