Sustainable Technology of 3580

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3580 ?

It seems you might be asking about the Dell Precision 3580 laptop and its sustainability features. Here’s a breakdown of what makes this laptop a more sustainable choice:

Sustainable Materials:

Recycled Content: Dell is increasingly using recycled plastics and other materials in their laptops, including the 3580 model. This reduces the need for virgin resources and helps divert waste from landfills.
Ocean-Bound Plastics: Some components may include plastics collected from beaches and coastlines, helping to reduce ocean pollution.

Energy Efficiency:

Efficient Components: The 3580 is designed with energy-efficient processors and components to minimize power consumption during use.
Power Management: Dell likely includes software and features to help users optimize battery life and reduce energy usage.

Responsible Manufacturing:

Eco-Labels: Dell often adheres to eco-labels like Energy Star and EPEAT, which certify that products meet certain environmental performance criteria.
Sustainable Packaging: Dell is working to reduce packaging waste and use more sustainable materials in their packaging.

Recycling and End-of-Life:

Take-Back Programs: Dell offers recycling programs to responsibly manage old devices, ensuring proper disposal and recovery of valuable materials.

Additional Points:

Durability: The Precision line is known for its durability, meaning the 3580 is likely to have a longer lifespan than less robust laptops, reducing the need for frequent replacements.
Modular Design: Some Dell laptops are designed with modularity in mind, making it easier to repair or upgrade components, further extending the device’s life.

Where to Find Specifics:

Dell’s Website: Check the official Dell website for detailed specifications and information on the 3580’s sustainability features.
Product Documentation: Look for environmental certifications or declarations in the laptop’s documentation.

Important Note: Sustainability in technology is an ongoing process. While the 3580 likely incorporates some sustainable elements, it’s essential to consider the full lifecycle of any electronic device and its overall environmental impact.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3580 ?

You’re asking a great question that gets at the heart of what “sustainable technology” means in the context of a laptop like the Dell Precision 3580. It’s not just about one single feature, but a combination of factors throughout the product’s lifecycle. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Materials Matter:

Recycled and Renewable Content: Dell is actively incorporating recycled plastics, and potentially other recycled materials like metals, into the 3580’s construction. This lessens the demand for virgin resources and helps reduce waste. They are also exploring the use of bio-based plastics derived from renewable resources.
Ocean-Bound Plastics: Dell has committed to using plastics collected from coastal areas to combat ocean pollution. It’s possible that some components in the 3580 utilize these recycled ocean-bound plastics.

2. Energy Efficiency is Key:

Optimized Components: The 3580 is engineered with energy-efficient processors (Intel Core i5 or i7) and other components to minimize power consumption during operation. This translates to lower energy bills and a reduced carbon footprint.
Intelligent Power Management: Dell likely includes software and features to help users optimize battery life and further reduce energy usage. This could involve things like power-saving modes, adaptive brightness, and efficient thermal management.

3. Responsible Manufacturing Practices:

Eco-Labels and Certifications: The 3580 likely adheres to environmental standards and certifications like Energy Star and EPEAT. These indicate that the product meets specific criteria for energy efficiency, material use, and other sustainability aspects.
Reduced Packaging Waste: Dell is working to minimize packaging waste and utilize more sustainable materials in their packaging. This often involves using recycled cardboard, molded fiber, and other eco-friendly alternatives to traditional plastic packaging.

4. Extending the Life Cycle:

Durability and Longevity: The Precision line is known for its robust build quality. A durable laptop like the 3580 has a longer lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements and the associated environmental impact.
Repairability and Upgradability: If the 3580 is designed with modularity in mind, it could be easier to repair or upgrade individual components. This further extends the device’s usable life and reduces electronic waste.

5. End-of-Life Considerations:

Recycling Programs: Dell offers take-back programs and recycling services to responsibly manage old devices. This ensures proper disposal and recovery of valuable materials, preventing them from ending up in landfills.

Important Considerations:

Transparency: It’s crucial for Dell to be transparent about the specific materials used, the percentage of recycled content, and the environmental impact of their manufacturing processes.
Continuous Improvement: Sustainability in technology is an ongoing journey. While the 3580 likely incorporates sustainable elements, it’s essential to recognize that there’s always room for improvement in reducing the environmental footprint of electronic devices.

To get the most detailed information about the Dell Precision 3580’s sustainability features, I recommend checking these resources:

Dell’s Official Website: Look for detailed specifications and environmental declarations on the product page.
Product Documentation: The laptop’s documentation may include information about its sustainability attributes and certifications.

By considering these factors, you can make a more informed decision about the environmental impact of your technology choices.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3580 ?

The need for sustainable technology like that found in the Dell Precision 3580 extends across a wide range of individuals and organizations. Here’s a breakdown of who benefits most:

1. Environmentally Conscious Consumers:

Individuals: People who are concerned about the environmental impact of their technology choices and want to reduce their carbon footprint. They seek products with recycled materials, energy efficiency, and responsible manufacturing.
Organizations: Businesses and institutions with sustainability goals and commitments to reducing their environmental impact. They look for eco-friendly IT equipment to align with their values and meet reporting requirements.

2. Businesses and Professionals:

Companies with ESG Goals: Organizations with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) targets often prioritize sustainable technology to improve their environmental performance and demonstrate corporate social responsibility.
Employees: Individuals who want to work for companies that are environmentally responsible and use technology that aligns with their personal values.
IT Departments: Organizations seeking to reduce energy costs, minimize e-waste, and improve the overall sustainability of their IT infrastructure.

3. Industries with Specific Needs:

Government Agencies: Public sector organizations are often required to prioritize sustainable procurement practices and choose environmentally friendly technology.
Education Institutions: Schools and universities are increasingly focused on sustainability and seek to reduce their environmental impact through responsible technology choices.
Creative Professionals: Designers, artists, and other creatives who value both performance and sustainability in their tools.

4. The Future of Technology:

Everyone: Ultimately, the shift towards sustainable technology benefits everyone by reducing environmental impact, conserving resources, and promoting a healthier planet.

Why is Sustainable Technology Important?

Resource Conservation: Sustainable technology reduces the demand for virgin resources and helps conserve precious materials.
Waste Reduction: It minimizes e-waste by promoting recycling, repairability, and longer product lifecycles.
Energy Efficiency: Sustainable technology helps reduce energy consumption, lowering costs and minimizing carbon emissions.
Environmental Protection: It contributes to protecting ecosystems, reducing pollution, and mitigating climate change.

In the context of the Dell Precision 3580, its sustainable features appeal to:

Professionals who need a high-performance workstation but also care about the environment.
Companies with sustainability initiatives that require eco-friendly IT equipment.
Individuals who want to make responsible technology choices without compromising on performance.

By choosing sustainable technology like the 3580, individuals and organizations can contribute to a more environmentally responsible and sustainable future.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3580 ?

You’re asking a very timely question! The need for sustainable technology like the Dell Precision 3580 is becoming increasingly urgent. Here’s when it’s most required:

1. Now:

Addressing Climate Change: The impacts of climate change are being felt globally. We need to adopt sustainable practices and technologies now to mitigate these effects.
Resource Depletion: Natural resources are finite. Sustainable technology helps conserve these resources by using recycled materials and reducing consumption.
E-waste Crisis: Electronic waste is a growing problem. Sustainable technology, with its focus on recyclability and longer lifecycles, helps reduce e-waste.

2. When Making Purchasing Decisions:

New Equipment: When buying new laptops or other tech, choose sustainable options like the 3580. Consider factors like recycled content, energy efficiency, and certifications.
Upgrades: Before replacing an older device, consider if it can be repaired or upgraded. This extends its lifespan and reduces the need for new products.

3. In Business and Organizations:

ESG Reporting: Companies with ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) goals need to demonstrate their commitment to sustainability through their technology choices.
Reducing Operational Costs: Energy-efficient technology can significantly lower energy bills and reduce operating costs.
Meeting Consumer Demands: Consumers are increasingly aware of environmental issues and prefer brands that offer sustainable products.

4. For a Sustainable Future:

Long-Term Sustainability: Sustainable technology is essential for creating a future where technology and the environment can coexist harmoniously.
Circular Economy: Moving towards a circular economy where resources are reused and recycled is crucial. Sustainable technology supports this model.

Specific Situations:

Government and Public Sector: When procuring technology, government agencies often have mandates to prioritize sustainable options.
Education: Schools and universities have a responsibility to educate students about sustainability and model responsible practices in their technology use.
Creative Industries: Designers and content creators who rely on powerful workstations can choose sustainable models like the 3580 without compromising performance.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology is not a future concern, but a present imperative. By choosing products like the Dell Precision 3580, we can all contribute to a more sustainable and environmentally responsible future for technology.

courtesy : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3580 ?

You’re right to focus on where sustainable technology is most needed! It’s not just a nice-to-have, but a crucial requirement in many areas. Here’s where the sustainable features of a laptop like the Dell Precision 3580 are essential:

1. Businesses and Organizations:

ESG Goals: Companies with Environmental, Social, and Governance targets are under increasing pressure to demonstrate their commitment to sustainability. Eco-friendly IT equipment helps them meet those goals.
Reducing Operational Costs: Energy-efficient technology lowers electricity bills, a significant factor for businesses of all sizes.
Meeting Consumer Demands: Customers are becoming more eco-conscious and prefer brands that offer sustainable products. This influences purchasing decisions.
IT Departments: Organizations seeking to minimize e-waste, improve their carbon footprint, and create a greener IT infrastructure.

2. Government and Public Sector:

Sustainable Procurement: Government agencies often have mandates to prioritize environmentally friendly products and services.
Leading by Example: Public sector organizations have a responsibility to model sustainable practices in their technology use.

3. Education Institutions:

Sustainability Education: Schools and universities need to educate students about environmental issues and demonstrate responsible technology choices.
Reducing Environmental Impact: Educational institutions can reduce their carbon footprint and operating costs by adopting sustainable IT solutions.

4. Industries with Specific Needs:

Creative Professionals: Designers, artists, and content creators who rely on high-performance workstations can choose sustainable models like the 3580 without sacrificing power.
Engineering and Design: Industries that require powerful laptops for demanding tasks like CAD and simulations can benefit from sustainable workstations.

5. The Future of Work:

Remote Work: As remote work becomes more common, sustainable technology helps reduce the environmental impact of commuting and office spaces.
Hybrid Work Models: Organizations transitioning to hybrid work models need flexible and sustainable IT solutions for both office and remote environments.

Beyond Specific Sectors:

Individuals: Environmentally conscious consumers who want to reduce their personal carbon footprint through responsible technology choices.
Global Supply Chains: Sustainable technology is needed throughout global supply chains to minimize environmental impact and promote ethical sourcing.

In essence, sustainable technology like the Dell Precision 3580 is required wherever technology is used. It’s a fundamental shift towards a more environmentally responsible and sustainable approach to technology consumption.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3580 ?

The need for sustainable technology in a device like the Dell Precision 3580 isn’t just a general concept; it arises from specific, pressing issues. Here’s how that need is generated:

The E-waste Problem: Our consumption of electronics generates a massive amount of e-waste, much of which ends up in landfills, polluting the environment with harmful substances. Sustainable technology is required to mitigate this by designing devices for longer lifespans, easier repair, and better recyclability.
Resource Depletion: Manufacturing electronics requires vast amounts of raw materials, some of which are finite and becoming scarce. Sustainable technology is required to conserve these resources by using recycled materials, reducing material usage overall, and designing products for reuse and repurposing.
Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint: Manufacturing and using electronic devices consumes significant energy, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Sustainable technology is required to reduce energy consumption through energy-efficient components and power management systems, thus lowering the carbon footprint of devices.
Environmental Impact of Manufacturing: The processes involved in manufacturing electronics can have significant environmental impacts, including pollution and habitat destruction. Sustainable technology is required to minimize these impacts by using cleaner manufacturing processes, reducing waste, and promoting responsible sourcing of materials.
Growing Consumer Demand: Consumers are increasingly aware of the environmental impact of their purchases and are demanding more sustainable products. This demand is requiring companies to develop and offer more eco-friendly options.
Regulations and Policies: Governments and organizations are implementing regulations and policies to promote sustainability and reduce environmental impact. This is requiring manufacturers to design and produce devices that meet these standards.
Ethical Considerations: Sustainable technology also encompasses ethical considerations, such as fair labor practices and responsible sourcing of minerals. Consumers and businesses are increasingly demanding that their electronics be produced ethically, requiring companies to address these issues.

In the specific case of the Dell Precision 3580, the how of the need for sustainable technology translates to:

Using recycled plastics: This addresses the e-waste problem and resource depletion.
Energy-efficient components: This reduces energy consumption and carbon footprint.
Durable design: This extends the lifespan of the device, reducing the need for frequent replacements and minimizing e-waste.
Responsible manufacturing processes: This reduces the environmental impact of production.

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology is driven by the negative environmental and social consequences of traditional electronics manufacturing and consumption. It’s not just a desirable feature; it’s becoming a requirement for responsible and ethical technology.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3580 ?

Unfortunately, there isn’t a readily available, formal case study specifically dedicated to the sustainable technology of the Dell Precision 3580. However, we can build a case study framework by examining its key sustainability features and their potential impact:

Case Study: Sustainable Technology in the Dell Precision 3580

Introduction:

The Dell Precision 3580 is a mobile workstation designed for professionals needing high performance. This case study examines its sustainable technology features and their potential benefits in addressing environmental concerns related to electronics.

Background:

The increasing demand for electronic devices has led to significant environmental challenges, including:

E-waste generation: Discarded electronics contribute to pollution and resource depletion.
Resource scarcity: Manufacturing electronics requires finite resources, some of which are becoming scarce.
Energy consumption: The production and use of electronics contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.

Dell Precision 3580: Sustainable Features

The 3580 incorporates several features aimed at mitigating these challenges:

Recycled plastics: Utilizing recycled plastics in its construction reduces the demand for virgin plastic and diverts plastic waste from landfills.
Energy-efficient components: Employing energy-efficient processors and other components minimizes power consumption during use, lowering energy costs and carbon footprint.
Durable design: A robust design extends the laptop’s lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements and minimizing e-waste.
Sustainable packaging: Dell’s commitment to sustainable packaging reduces waste and promotes responsible sourcing of packaging materials.

Potential Benefits:

Reduced environmental impact: These features contribute to lowering the 3580’s environmental footprint throughout its lifecycle.
Resource conservation: Using recycled materials and designing for durability helps conserve valuable resources.
Energy cost savings: Energy-efficient components translate to lower electricity bills for users.
Positive brand image: Dell’s commitment to sustainability enhances its brand image and appeals to environmentally conscious consumers.

Challenges and Considerations:

Transparency: It’s crucial to have transparent data on the percentage of recycled content and the environmental impact of manufacturing processes.
End-of-life management: Ensuring proper recycling and responsible disposal of the device at the end of its life is essential to maximize its sustainability benefits.
Continuous improvement: Ongoing efforts to improve the sustainability of materials, manufacturing, and packaging are necessary.

Conclusion:

The Dell Precision 3580 demonstrates a commitment to sustainable technology through its use of recycled materials, energy-efficient design, and durable construction. While challenges remain, these features represent a positive step towards reducing the environmental impact of high-performance laptops. Further research and data collection can help quantify the specific environmental benefits achieved through these sustainable practices.

Recommendations:

Enhance transparency: Provide detailed information on recycled content, material sourcing, and manufacturing processes.
Promote end-of-life recycling: Encourage and facilitate responsible recycling of the device through take-back programs or partnerships with recycling organizations.
Set ambitious sustainability goals: Continue to raise the bar for sustainable technology in future product development.

This framework provides a starting point for a more in-depth case study. Further research, data collection, and analysis could provide a more comprehensive assessment of the 3580’s sustainability performance.

courtesy : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3580 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in the Dell Precision 3580

Abstract:

The increasing demand for high-performance computing devices necessitates a focus on sustainability to mitigate the environmental impact of electronics. This white paper examines the sustainable technology features incorporated into the Dell Precision 3580 mobile workstation, analyzing their potential benefits and challenges in addressing the growing concerns surrounding e-waste, resource depletion, and energy consumption.

1. Introduction:

The Dell Precision 3580 is a mobile workstation designed for professionals requiring robust performance. However, the high performance of such devices often comes at an environmental cost. This white paper argues that sustainability must be a core consideration in the design and manufacturing of high-performance technology and examines how the 3580 attempts to integrate sustainable practices.

2. The Need for Sustainable Technology:

The electronics industry faces significant environmental challenges:

E-waste: The rapid obsolescence of electronic devices generates vast amounts of e-waste, containing hazardous materials that can leach into the environment.
Resource Depletion: The manufacturing of electronics relies on finite resources, including rare earth minerals, some of which are mined under environmentally and socially problematic conditions.
Energy Consumption: Both the manufacturing and use of electronic devices contribute significantly to global energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

3. Sustainable Features of the Dell Precision 3580:

The 3580 incorporates several features aimed at addressing these challenges:

Recycled Plastics: The use of recycled plastics in the chassis and other components reduces the demand for virgin plastic and diverts plastic waste from landfills. This helps conserve resources and reduces pollution.
Energy-Efficient Components: The selection of energy-efficient processors, displays, and other components minimizes power consumption during use. This translates to lower energy costs for users and a reduced carbon footprint.
Durable Design: The Precision line is known for its robust build quality. A durable design extends the lifespan of the laptop, reducing the need for frequent replacements and minimizing e-waste generation. This also reduces the overall resource consumption associated with manufacturing new devices.
Sustainable Packaging: Dell is actively working to reduce packaging waste and utilize more sustainable materials in its packaging. This often includes using recycled cardboard and other eco-friendly alternatives to traditional plastic packaging.

4. Potential Benefits and Impact:

The sustainable features of the 3580 offer several potential benefits:

Reduced Environmental Footprint: By minimizing resource consumption, energy usage, and e-waste generation, the 3580 contributes to a lower overall environmental impact.
Cost Savings: Energy-efficient components can lead to lower electricity bills for users over the lifespan of the device.
Enhanced Brand Reputation: Dell’s commitment to sustainability can enhance its brand image and appeal to environmentally conscious consumers.
Contribution to a Circular Economy: By incorporating recycled materials and designing for durability, the 3580 supports the transition towards a circular economy for electronics.

5. Challenges and Considerations:

While the 3580 incorporates sustainable features, some challenges and considerations remain:

Transparency and Traceability: Detailed information on the percentage of recycled content, the source of materials, and the environmental impact of manufacturing processes is crucial for transparency and accountability.
End-of-Life Management: Effective and accessible recycling programs are essential to ensure that the device is properly handled at the end of its life, maximizing material recovery and minimizing e-waste.
Continuous Improvement: Sustainability is an ongoing journey. Continuous improvement in materials science, manufacturing processes, and product design is necessary to further reduce the environmental impact of electronics.

6. Conclusion:

The Dell Precision 3580 represents a step towards more sustainable high-performance computing. By incorporating recycled plastics, energy-efficient components, and a durable design, it offers a more environmentally responsible option for professionals. However, continued efforts in transparency, end-of-life management, and continuous improvement are crucial to fully realize the potential of sustainable technology in the electronics industry.

7. Recommendations:

Dell should provide more detailed information regarding the specific materials used, the percentage of recycled content, and the environmental impact of the 3580’s manufacturing process.
Dell should strengthen its take-back programs and recycling initiatives to ensure responsible end-of-life management for its products.
The electronics industry as a whole should invest in research and development of new sustainable materials and manufacturing processes to further reduce the environmental impact of electronics.

This white paper provides a framework for understanding the sustainable technology features of the Dell Precision 3580. It highlights the importance of sustainability in the electronics industry and encourages further development and adoption of eco-friendly practices.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3580 ?

While the Dell Precision 3580 is a laptop targeted at individual professionals, its underlying sustainable technologies have broader industrial applications. Here’s how the principles embodied in the 3580 translate to industrial settings:

1. Sustainable Manufacturing Processes:

Recycled Materials Integration: The 3580’s use of recycled plastics demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating recycled materials into durable goods. This principle can be applied across industries, from automotive and construction to consumer goods, reducing reliance on virgin resources and minimizing waste.
Closed-Loop Systems: Industries can adopt closed-loop systems where materials are recovered from end-of-life products and reused in new manufacturing processes. This minimizes waste and creates a circular economy.
Energy-Efficient Production: The focus on energy efficiency in the 3580’s design translates to industrial settings by emphasizing energy-efficient manufacturing processes. This includes optimizing production lines, using energy-saving equipment, and minimizing waste.

2. Sustainable Product Design:

Design for Durability: The 3580’s durable design emphasizes the importance of creating products with longer lifespans. Industries can apply this principle by building products that are more robust, repairable, and upgradable, reducing the need for frequent replacements. This applies to everything from industrial machinery to appliances.
Modular Design: Modular design, if incorporated into the 3580 (and it’s a trend in some laptops), facilitates repair and upgrades, extending the product’s life. This principle is highly applicable in industrial settings, allowing for easier maintenance and upgrades of complex machinery.
Lightweighting: Using lighter materials, as seen in the 3580 (though not its primary focus), can reduce material usage and energy consumption in transportation. This is particularly relevant in the automotive and aerospace industries.

3. Energy Efficiency in Operations:

Energy-Efficient Equipment: The 3580’s energy-efficient components translate to industrial settings by emphasizing the use of energy-efficient machinery and equipment. This can significantly reduce energy costs and carbon emissions.
Smart Energy Management: Just as the 3580 likely incorporates power management features, industries can implement smart energy management systems to optimize energy usage in factories and other facilities. This includes monitoring energy consumption, identifying areas for improvement, and automating energy-saving measures.

4. Waste Reduction and Resource Management:

Waste Minimization: The focus on reducing waste in the 3580’s packaging can be applied to industrial settings by implementing waste reduction programs throughout the manufacturing process. This includes minimizing material waste, reusing materials, and recycling whenever possible.
Responsible Sourcing: Industries can adopt responsible sourcing practices, similar to Dell’s efforts with recycled plastics, ensuring that materials are sourced ethically and sustainably.

5. Circular Economy Principles:

Product Stewardship: Industries can embrace product stewardship programs, taking responsibility for the environmental impact of their products throughout their lifecycle, from design and manufacturing to end-of-life management.
Take-Back and Recycling Programs: Similar to Dell’s recycling programs, industries can implement take-back programs to facilitate the recycling and reuse of their products at the end of their life.

Examples of Industrial Applications:

Automotive: Using recycled materials in car parts, designing for fuel efficiency, implementing closed-loop recycling systems.
Manufacturing: Optimizing production lines for energy efficiency, using renewable energy sources, minimizing waste generation.
Construction: Using sustainable building materials, designing energy-efficient buildings, reducing construction waste.
Consumer Goods: Designing durable and repairable products, using recycled packaging, implementing take-back programs.

In essence, the sustainable technologies and design principles demonstrated in the Dell Precision 3580, while focused on a single device, have much broader implications for industrial sustainability. They provide a blueprint for how industries can reduce their environmental impact, conserve resources, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3580 ?

You’re hitting on a crucial point! Research and development (R&D) is the engine driving advancements in sustainable technology, and it’s essential for continuously improving devices like the Dell Precision 3580. Here’s a look at the R&D areas most relevant to its sustainable technology:

1. Advanced Materials Research:

Bio-based Plastics: R&D into new bio-based plastics derived from renewable resources (like corn or sugarcane) can further reduce reliance on petroleum-based plastics. These materials need to be durable, heat-resistant, and meet the performance standards for laptop components.
Recycled Material Innovations: R&D is needed to improve the quality and consistency of recycled materials, making them suitable for a wider range of applications in laptops. This includes developing better methods for sorting, processing, and repurposing various types of plastics, metals, and other materials.
Sustainable Alternatives: Exploring and developing sustainable alternatives to traditional materials used in laptops, such as rare earth minerals or certain metals, is crucial for reducing environmental impact and resource depletion.

2. Energy Efficiency Enhancements:

Next-Generation Processors: Continued R&D in processor technology focuses on increasing performance while simultaneously reducing power consumption. This involves advancements in chip architecture, manufacturing processes, and power management techniques.
Display Technology: Developing more energy-efficient display technologies, such as OLED or microLED, can significantly reduce the overall power consumption of laptops.
Battery Technology: R&D into longer-lasting and more sustainable battery technologies is essential for extending the battery life of laptops and reducing the need for frequent replacements. This includes exploring new battery chemistries and improving battery recycling processes.

3. Design for Sustainability:

Modular Design: Research into modular design principles can make laptops easier to repair, upgrade, and recycle. This involves developing standardized components and interfaces that can be easily replaced or upgraded, extending the lifespan of the device.
Design for Disassembly: R&D in design for disassembly focuses on making it easier to take apart laptops for recycling or repair. This involves using fewer adhesives, more mechanical fasteners, and clear labeling of components.
Life Cycle Assessment: Conducting thorough life cycle assessments of laptops can help identify areas where environmental impact can be reduced. This involves analyzing the environmental impact of materials, manufacturing, transportation, use, and end-of-life management.

4. Manufacturing Process Innovation:

Cleaner Manufacturing: Research into cleaner and more efficient manufacturing processes can reduce the environmental footprint of laptop production. This includes minimizing waste, reducing energy consumption, and using less harmful chemicals.
Sustainable Supply Chains: R&D in sustainable supply chain management focuses on ensuring that materials are sourced responsibly and that workers are treated ethically throughout the supply chain.
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: Exploring the use of 3D printing and additive manufacturing techniques can enable more efficient use of materials and potentially reduce waste in laptop manufacturing.

5. Recycling and End-of-Life Solutions:

Advanced Recycling Technologies: R&D into advanced recycling technologies can improve the recovery of valuable materials from end-of-life laptops. This includes developing more efficient methods for separating different materials and recovering rare earth minerals.
E-waste Management: Research into better e-waste management strategies can help reduce the environmental and health risks associated with improper disposal of electronic devices.

How This Impacts the 3580 and Future Laptops:

Improved Materials: Future versions of the 3580 could incorporate more bio-based plastics, higher percentages of recycled materials, or alternative materials with lower environmental impact.
Enhanced Energy Efficiency: Continued advancements in processors, displays, and battery technology can lead to more energy-efficient 3580 models.
Extended Lifespan: Modular design and improved durability could extend the lifespan of the 3580, reducing the need for replacements.
Easier Recycling: Design for disassembly and better recycling technologies can make it easier to recycle the 3580 at the end of its life.

By investing in these R&D areas, Dell and other manufacturers can continue to improve the sustainability of laptops like the 3580, minimizing their environmental impact and contributing to a more sustainable future for technology.

courtesy : RBC

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.