Sustainable Technology of 3570 ?

Leave a Comment / Blog, Sustainable Technology of 3570 / By
81 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Unfortunately, there is no widely recognized or established “Sustainable Technology of 3570.” It’s possible this refers to:

  • A specific product or model number: If this is the case, providing more context about the product or its purpose would be helpful in determining its sustainability aspects.
  • A future technology: It’s also possible this refers to a technology that is still in development or conceptual stage. In this case, it’s difficult to assess its sustainability without further information.

However, in general, sustainable technology aims to reduce environmental impact and promote social responsibility. Here are some key aspects of sustainable technology:

  • Reduced energy consumption: Utilizing energy-efficient designs and renewable energy sources.
  • Resource conservation: Minimizing the use of raw materials and promoting recycling and reuse.
  • Pollution reduction: Reducing emissions and waste generation.
  • Life cycle assessment: Considering the environmental impact of a technology throughout its entire life cycle, from production to disposal.
  • Social equity: Ensuring that technology benefits all members of society and does not exacerbate inequalities.

If you can provide more information about the “Sustainable Technology of 3570,” I may be able to give you a more specific answer.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3570 ?

It seems you might be thinking of the Dell Precision 3570 Mobile Workstation.

While it’s not called “Sustainable Technology of 3570”, this laptop does have a strong focus on sustainability. Here’s how:

  • Recycled and Renewable Materials: The lid is made with 71% recycled or renewable materials, including ocean-bound plastics and a bioplastic called Tall Oil derived from trees.
  • Responsible Packaging: Dell is committed to using recycled or renewable materials in their packaging, with a goal of 100% by 2030.
  • Recycling Program: Dell offers a program to recycle or reuse e-waste, supporting a circular economy.

These features demonstrate Dell’s commitment to reducing environmental impact and promoting sustainability in their products.

If you’re interested in learning more about the Dell Precision 3570, you can visit their website or check out reviews online.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3570 ?

The Dell Precision 3570 Mobile Workstation, with its focus on sustainability, would be particularly appealing to:

  • Environmentally Conscious Businesses: Companies with sustainability goals and initiatives will find the 3570’s use of recycled and renewable materials, responsible packaging, and recycling programs aligned with their values.
  • Organizations with Green Procurement Policies: Many organizations, especially government agencies and educational institutions, have policies that prioritize environmentally friendly products. The 3570’s sustainability features make it a strong contender for these buyers.
  • Individuals Concerned about E-waste: Consumers who are aware of the environmental impact of electronics and want to reduce their contribution to e-waste will appreciate the 3570’s recycled materials and Dell’s recycling program.
  • Companies Seeking to Reduce their Carbon Footprint: The use of recycled and renewable materials, along with energy-efficient design, helps reduce the overall carbon footprint associated with the 3570. This is important for companies looking to minimize their environmental impact.

Essentially, anyone who values sustainability and wants to make environmentally responsible choices when purchasing technology would be interested in the Dell Precision 3570.

It’s important to remember that while the 3570 has sustainable features, it’s also a powerful workstation designed for professionals in fields like:

  • Engineering: CAD, simulations, and other demanding applications.
  • Design: Graphic design, video editing, and 3D modeling.
  • Finance: Data analysis and financial modeling.
  • Science: Research and data processing.

So, while sustainability is a key factor, the 3570 also needs to meet the performance requirements of these professionals.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3570 ?

The Dell Precision 3570 was released on March 31st, 2022.

While it’s not the newest model anymore, it’s still a relevant option, especially if you’re looking for a balance of performance and sustainability.

Keep in mind that technology evolves rapidly, so newer models with potentially improved features and sustainability aspects may be available. However, the 3570’s focus on recycled and renewable materials, responsible packaging, and recycling programs remains valuable.

Ultimately, when the “Sustainable Technology of 3570” (the Dell Precision 3570) is “required” depends on your specific needs and priorities:

  • When you need a powerful workstation: If you have demanding tasks like CAD, video editing, or data analysis, and you need a reliable machine to handle them, the 3570 could be a good fit.
  • When sustainability is a priority: If you’re an environmentally conscious individual or organization, the 3570’s sustainable features make it a more appealing choice compared to less eco-friendly alternatives.
  • When budget is a factor: Older models like the 3570 might be available at a lower price point compared to the latest releases, allowing you to balance performance and cost while still making a more sustainable choice.

If you’re considering the Dell Precision 3570, it’s worth checking current prices and comparing it with newer models to see which one best suits your needs and budget.

courtesy : RBC

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3570 ?

You can find the Dell Precision 3570 at a variety of retailers, both online and in physical stores. Here are some common places to look:

  • Dell’s Official Website: This is a great place to start, as you can often customize your configuration and find the latest deals.
  • Major Online Retailers: Websites like Amazon, Newegg, and CDW often carry the 3570 and may offer competitive pricing.
  • Local Electronics Stores: Check with your local electronics retailers, such as Best Buy or Micro Center, to see if they have the 3570 in stock.
  • Business Equipment Suppliers: Companies that specialize in selling technology to businesses may also carry the 3570.

When choosing where to buy, consider factors like:

  • Price: Compare prices from different retailers to find the best deal.
  • Availability: Check if the retailer has the configuration you want in stock.
  • Warranty and Support: Consider the warranty and support offered by the retailer.
  • Return Policy: Make sure you understand the retailer’s return policy in case you need to return the laptop.

Remember that the Dell Precision 3570 is not the newest model, so availability may vary. You might also find good deals on refurbished or used models from reputable sellers.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3570 ?

How the Dell Precision 3570 is “required” depends entirely on your specific needs. It’s not a universal “requirement” for everyone. Instead, it becomes a good choice if certain conditions are met. Let’s break down those conditions:

1. Performance Needs:

  • Demanding Tasks: The 3570 is a workstation, meaning it’s designed for resource-intensive applications. If you’re regularly working with software for:
    • CAD/CAM: 3D modeling, simulations, design work
    • Video Editing/Graphics: Rendering, complex video projects, animation
    • Data Science/Analysis: Large datasets, statistical modeling, machine learning
    • Software Development: Compiling code, running virtual machines
  • Then: The 3570’s processing power, dedicated graphics (if configured), and ample RAM become required for efficient workflow.

2. Sustainability Concerns:

  • Eco-Conscious User/Organization: If you or your company prioritize environmental responsibility, the 3570’s use of recycled/renewable materials, responsible packaging, and recycling program become required considerations in your purchasing decision.
  • E-Waste Reduction: If minimizing electronic waste is important to you, the 3570, combined with Dell’s recycling program, helps fulfill that requirement.

3. Budget:

  • Balancing Cost and Performance: While not the newest model, the 3570 might offer a good balance of performance and cost, especially if you find it at a discounted price. If your budget is a constraint, but you still need workstation-level power and some sustainable features, the 3570 might be “required” as a compromise.

4. Availability:

  • Finding the Right Configuration: Because it’s an older model, finding a new 3570 with the exact specifications you need might be challenging. If you find one that perfectly meets your needs and budget, then it becomes “required” in the sense that it’s the best available option for you.

In short: The Dell Precision 3570 is “required” when its combination of performance, sustainability features, price, and availability aligns with your specific requirements. It’s not a universal “must-have,” but a strong contender for certain users and use cases.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3570 ?

While a full-blown, formal case study specifically on the Dell Precision 3570’s sustainability might be hard to find, we can definitely build a strong case for its sustainable technology by examining the available information. Here’s a breakdown:

Case Study: Sustainable Technology in the Dell Precision 3570

Introduction:

The Dell Precision 3570 Mobile Workstation incorporates several key sustainability features, demonstrating a commitment to reducing environmental impact and promoting responsible resource management. This case study will examine these features and their potential benefits.

Key Sustainability Features:

  • Recycled and Renewable Materials:
    • The laptop’s lid is made with 71% recycled or renewable materials. This includes:
      • Ocean-bound plastics: Recovered from oceans and waterways, reducing plastic pollution.
      • Tall Oil: A bioplastic derived from trees, a renewable resource and byproduct of papermaking.
      • Reclaimed Carbon Fiber: Giving a second life to this lightweight and durable material.
      • Recycled Plastic: Further reducing the need for virgin plastic production.
  • Responsible Packaging:
    • Dell is committed to using recycled or renewable materials in their packaging, with a goal of 100% by 2030. This minimizes waste and promotes a circular economy.
  • Recycling Program:
    • Dell offers a program for recycling or reusing e-waste, encouraging responsible disposal and reducing the environmental burden of electronic devices.

Benefits:

  • Reduced Environmental Impact:
    • Lower reliance on virgin plastic and other resources.
    • Decreased plastic pollution in oceans and waterways.
    • Reduced carbon footprint associated with material production and transportation.
    • Responsible e-waste management.
  • Resource Conservation:
    • Utilizing recycled and renewable materials helps conserve natural resources.
  • Circular Economy Support:
    • Dell’s recycling program promotes a circular economy by keeping valuable materials in use and reducing waste.
  • Positive Brand Image:
    • Companies that prioritize sustainability enhance their brand image and appeal to environmentally conscious consumers.

Challenges:

  • Material Sourcing and Traceability:
    • Ensuring the responsible sourcing and traceability of recycled and renewable materials can be complex.
  • Cost Considerations:
    • Implementing sustainable practices and materials may involve higher costs, which need to be balanced with market competitiveness.
  • Product Lifecycle Management:
    • Further efforts are needed to address the entire product lifecycle, including energy efficiency during use and end-of-life management.

Conclusion:

The Dell Precision 3570 demonstrates a positive step towards sustainable technology in the mobile workstation category. By incorporating recycled and renewable materials, responsible packaging, and a recycling program, Dell is contributing to reducing environmental impact and promoting a more circular economy. While challenges remain, the 3570 serves as an example of how technology can be designed with sustainability in mind.

Further Research:

  • Analyzing Dell’s sustainability reports and initiatives for more detailed information.
  • Comparing the 3570’s sustainability features with other mobile workstations in the market.
  • Investigating the long-term environmental impact of the materials used in the 3570.

This “case study” highlights the key sustainability aspects of the Dell Precision 3570. While not a formal document, it provides a structured overview of its features and potential benefits.

courtesy : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3570 ?

Unfortunately, a dedicated white paper specifically focusing on the Dell Precision 3570’s sustainability is not readily available. However, Dell does publish information about their broader sustainability initiatives and the specific sustainable features incorporated into their products, including the 3570.

Here’s how you can gather information and build a “white paper” of your own, combining information from various sources:

1. Dell’s Sustainability Reports:

  • Dell’s Progress Made Real Report: This annual report provides comprehensive information about Dell’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, including their goals and progress in areas like sustainable materials, packaging, and recycling. You can find this report on Dell’s website.
  • Dell’s Website: Explore the sustainability section of Dell’s website, where they often highlight their initiatives and provide details about specific product features, such as the use of recycled plastics and bioplastics in the 3570.

2. Product Documentation:

  • Dell Precision 3570 Product Page: The official product page on Dell’s website may contain information about the laptop’s sustainable features, such as the percentage of recycled materials used in the lid.
  • Datasheets and Brochures: Download any available datasheets or brochures for the 3570. These documents may provide more detailed specifications about the materials used and the product’s environmental certifications.

3. Third-Party Reviews and Articles:

  • Tech Websites and Publications: Many tech websites and publications review laptops, including the Dell Precision 3570. Some reviews may highlight the laptop’s sustainability features and discuss their significance.
  • Sustainability-Focused Websites: Websites that focus on sustainability and environmental issues may have articles or reports that mention the 3570 and its eco-friendly aspects.

4. Assembling Your “White Paper”:

  • Introduction: Start by introducing the Dell Precision 3570 and its target audience (professionals in fields like engineering, design, etc.). Emphasize the growing importance of sustainable technology in the business world.
  • Sustainability Features: Detail the specific sustainable features of the 3570, such as:
    • Recycled and renewable materials used in the lid (ocean-bound plastics, Tall Oil, reclaimed carbon fiber, recycled plastic).
    • Dell’s commitment to responsible packaging.
    • Dell’s recycling program for e-waste.
  • Benefits: Discuss the environmental and business benefits of these features, such as:
    • Reduced environmental impact (lower reliance on virgin resources, decreased plastic pollution, reduced carbon footprint).
    • Support for a circular economy.
    • Positive brand image for companies that prioritize sustainability.
  • Challenges: Acknowledge any challenges associated with sustainable technology, such as:
    • Sourcing and traceability of recycled materials.
    • Potential cost considerations.
    • The need for continuous improvement in product lifecycle management.
  • Conclusion: Summarize the key sustainability aspects of the 3570 and reiterate its potential value for environmentally conscious businesses and individuals.

By combining information from these sources, you can create a comprehensive “white paper” that showcases the sustainable technology incorporated into the Dell Precision 3570. Remember to cite your sources properly.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3570 ?

While the Dell Precision 3570 is a mobile workstation, its sustainable technology features can be valuable in various industrial applications. Here are some examples:

1. Design and Engineering:

  • Sustainable Product Design: Engineers and designers can use the 3570 to create more sustainable products by incorporating lifecycle assessment tools and considering the environmental impact of materials and manufacturing processes.
  • Architecture and Construction: Architects can use the 3570 to design energy-efficient buildings and incorporate sustainable materials in their projects.
  • Manufacturing: Manufacturers can use the 3570 to optimize production processes, reduce waste, and implement sustainable supply chain practices.

2. Environmental Science and Consulting:

  • Data Analysis and Modeling: Environmental scientists can use the 3570 to analyze environmental data, create models, and develop solutions for environmental challenges.
  • GIS and Remote Sensing: Professionals in geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing can use the 3570 to process and analyze geospatial data for environmental monitoring and conservation efforts.
  • Environmental Consulting: Consultants can use the 3570 to prepare reports, conduct research, and develop sustainability strategies for businesses and organizations.

3. Energy and Natural Resources:

  • Renewable Energy: Engineers and technicians in the renewable energy sector can use the 3570 to design and analyze renewable energy systems, such as solar and wind power plants.
  • Natural Resource Management: Professionals in natural resource management can use the 3570 to analyze data, model ecosystems, and develop sustainable management plans for forests, water resources, and other natural resources.

4. Other Industries:

  • Agriculture: Precision agriculture techniques can be used to optimize resource use and reduce environmental impact in farming. The 3570 can be used to process and analyze data from sensors and drones.
  • Transportation: The 3570 can be used to design and analyze more sustainable transportation systems, such as electric vehicles and public transportation networks.

How the 3570’s Sustainability Features are Relevant:

  • Recycled and Renewable Materials: Companies in these industries can demonstrate their commitment to sustainability by using equipment made with recycled and renewable materials.
  • Responsible Packaging: This feature aligns with the sustainability goals of many organizations.
  • Recycling Program: Proper disposal of electronic equipment is crucial in these industries, and Dell’s recycling program provides a responsible solution.

By using the Dell Precision 3570, professionals in various industrial sectors can not only perform their tasks efficiently but also contribute to a more sustainable future.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3570 ?

While Dell doesn’t publish specific research papers on the 3570’s sustainability, their efforts in this area are driven by ongoing research and development. Here’s how R&D plays a role in the 3570’s sustainable technology, and what areas are likely being explored:

1. Materials Science:

  • Recycled Plastics: Research into efficient methods for collecting, sorting, and processing ocean-bound plastics and other recycled plastics is crucial. This includes ensuring the quality and durability of the recycled materials for use in laptop components.
  • Bioplastics: Dell explores the use of plant-based bioplastics like Tall Oil, a byproduct of the paper industry. R&D focuses on optimizing the production and properties of these bioplastics to meet the demands of electronic devices.
  • Reclaimed Carbon Fiber: Finding ways to reclaim and reuse carbon fiber from various sources (aerospace, etc.) is an ongoing area of research. This involves developing processes to break down and re-form carbon fiber without compromising its strength.

2. Manufacturing Processes:

  • Reducing Waste: R&D efforts focus on minimizing waste during the manufacturing process, including optimizing material usage and finding ways to reuse or recycle byproducts.
  • Energy Efficiency: Research is conducted to improve the energy efficiency of manufacturing processes, reducing the environmental impact of production.

3. Packaging:

  • Recycled and Renewable Content: Dell is actively researching and developing new packaging materials made from recycled and renewable sources. This includes exploring alternatives to traditional plastics and finding ways to create packaging that is both protective and environmentally friendly.

4. Recycling and End-of-Life Management:

  • E-waste Recycling Technologies: Dell invests in research to improve e-waste recycling technologies, including more efficient ways to recover valuable materials from electronic devices.
  • Circular Economy Models: R&D explores ways to implement circular economy models, where products are designed for disassembly and reuse, minimizing waste and maximizing resource recovery.

5. Lifecycle Assessment:

  • Environmental Impact Analysis: Dell likely conducts lifecycle assessments to analyze the environmental impact of their products throughout their entire lifecycle, from material extraction to end-of-life management. This research helps identify areas for improvement in sustainability.

Areas of Ongoing Exploration:

  • Further Increasing Recycled Content: Dell aims to increase the percentage of recycled and renewable materials in their products. R&D plays a key role in finding new sources of recycled materials and developing innovative ways to incorporate them into their products.
  • Reducing Carbon Footprint: Dell is committed to reducing their carbon footprint. R&D efforts likely focus on improving energy efficiency in their products and manufacturing processes, as well as exploring the use of low-carbon materials.
  • Sustainable Supply Chains: Dell is working to build more sustainable supply chains. R&D can contribute by identifying and evaluating suppliers who prioritize sustainability and by developing strategies to reduce the environmental impact of transportation and logistics.

While specific research papers on the 3570 might not be publicly available, Dell’s overall commitment to sustainability is evident in their reports and initiatives. Their ongoing R&D efforts are crucial for developing more sustainable technologies and products in the future.

courtesy : Bernard Marr

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »