Sustainable Technology of 3190

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3190 ?

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/3190 focuses on the use of bisphenol A (BPA) and other bisphenols and bisphenol derivatives with harmonised classification for specific hazardous properties in certain materials and articles intended to come into contact with food.

It amends Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 and prohibits the use of BPA and its salts in the manufacture of food-contact plastics, varnishes and coatings, printing inks, adhesives, ion-exchange resins, silicones, and rubber. Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 3190 ?

Sustainable technology in 3190 would likely be far more advanced than what we have today. Here are some potential areas of focus:

Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources would be highly efficient and widely used. Advanced energy storage solutions would ensure a stable and reliable power supply.
Resource Management: Closed-loop systems would minimize waste and pollution. Materials would be recycled and reused extensively, reducing the need for raw materials.
Transportation: Electric vehicles and other forms of sustainable transportation would be dominant. Advanced traffic management systems would optimize traffic flow and reduce congestion.
Agriculture: Precision agriculture and vertical farming would increase food production while reducing water and land use. Genetically modified crops could be more resilient to climate change and require fewer pesticides.
Manufacturing: Advanced manufacturing techniques like 3D printing would enable on-demand production and reduce waste. Sustainable materials and processes would minimize environmental impact.
Healthcare: Advanced medical technologies would improve diagnostics and treatment. Personalized medicine and preventative care would become more common.
Communication: High-speed, low-latency communication networks would connect people and devices seamlessly. Virtual and augmented reality technologies would enhance communication and collaboration.
Artificial Intelligence: AI would be integrated into many aspects of life, from transportation and healthcare to manufacturing and resource management. AI systems would be designed to be energy-efficient and environmentally friendly.
Space Exploration: Space travel and colonization would become more common. Sustainable technologies would be essential for long-term space missions and establishing self-sustaining settlements on other planets.

Overall, sustainable technology in 3190 would be focused on minimizing environmental impact, conserving resources, and improving quality of life. It would be integrated into all aspects of society, from energy production and transportation to healthcare and communication.Sources and related conte

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3190 ?

It’s interesting to think about who would be “required” to use sustainable technology in 3190! Here’s how I imagine it:

Governments and Regulatory Bodies: They would likely set strict standards and regulations for environmental protection, mandating the use of sustainable technologies in all sectors. This would ensure that businesses and individuals comply with sustainability goals.
Businesses: Companies would be required to adopt sustainable practices throughout their operations, from sourcing materials and manufacturing products to managing waste and energy consumption. This would not only be a legal requirement but also a matter of attracting customers and investors who prioritize sustainability.
Individuals: People would be encouraged, and in some cases required, to use sustainable technologies in their daily lives. This could include using renewable energy sources, adopting sustainable transportation methods, and consuming products made from recycled or sustainable materials.
Communities: Cities and towns would be designed with sustainability in mind, incorporating green spaces, efficient public transportation, and smart energy grids. Community initiatives would promote sustainable living and resource conservation.

Essentially, everyone would have a role to play in ensuring the widespread adoption and use of sustainable technology in 3190. It would be an integral part of society, driven by both regulations and a collective understanding of its importance for the well-being of the planet and future generations.

However, “required” might not be the only motivator. By 3190, the benefits of sustainable technology would likely be so clear and widespread that people would naturally choose it. It would be more efficient, cost-effective, and offer a higher quality of life.

It’s fascinating to imagine how sustainability will be woven into the fabric of society centuries from now!

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3190 ?

It’s hard to put an exact date on when sustainable technology will be “required” in the way we might think of it today. However, here’s how I imagine the timeline progressing towards widespread adoption of sustainable technology by 3190:

Now – 2100s:

Growing Awareness: The importance of sustainability continues to increase, driven by climate change, resource depletion, and environmental concerns.
Technological Advancements: Sustainable technologies become more efficient, cost-effective, and widely available.
Policy and Regulations: Governments implement stricter environmental regulations and incentivize sustainable practices.
Shifting Consumer Preferences: Consumers increasingly demand sustainable products and services, driving businesses to adopt eco-friendly practices.

2200s – 2500s:

Integration: Sustainable technologies become integrated into various aspects of life, from energy production and transportation to manufacturing and agriculture.
Infrastructure Development: Cities and communities are redesigned with sustainability in mind, incorporating green spaces, efficient public transportation, and smart energy grids.
Education and Awareness: Sustainability becomes a core part of education, fostering a deep understanding of its importance for the well-being of the planet and future generations.

2600s – 3190:

Widespread Adoption: Sustainable technology becomes the norm, driven by both regulations and a collective understanding of its benefits.
Continuous Improvement: Ongoing innovation leads to even more efficient and sustainable technologies.
Cultural Shift: Sustainability is ingrained in society’s values and behaviors, influencing individual choices and community initiatives.

By 3190, it’s likely that sustainable technology will be so deeply embedded in society that it won’t necessarily be perceived as a “requirement” but rather as the natural and most logical way of doing things. It will be a fundamental part of how people live, work, and interact with the world around them.

It’s important to remember that this is just a hypothetical timeline. The actual pace of change will depend on various factors, including technological advancements, economic conditions, and societal attitudes. However, the trend towards greater sustainability is clear, and it’s likely to continue for centuries to come.Sources and related conten

COURTESY : Carnegie India

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3190 ?

It’s likely that sustainable technology in 3190 would be required in virtually all aspects of life. Here are some key areas where it would be essential:

Energy Production and Distribution: Renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal would be the primary means of generating electricity. Smart grids and advanced energy storage solutions would ensure efficient distribution and minimize waste.
Transportation: Electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and other forms of sustainable transportation would be dominant. Advanced traffic management systems would optimize traffic flow and reduce congestion.
Buildings and Infrastructure: Buildings would be designed and constructed using sustainable materials and energy-efficient technologies. Smart building management systems would optimize energy use and resource consumption.
Manufacturing and Industry: Sustainable manufacturing processes, closed-loop systems, and the use of recycled and renewable materials would be standard practice in all industries.
Agriculture and Food Production: Precision agriculture, vertical farming, and other sustainable farming techniques would be used to increase food production while minimizing environmental impact.
Resource Management: Advanced recycling and waste management systems would ensure that resources are used efficiently and that waste is minimized.
Water Management: Water conservation and purification technologies would be essential to ensure access to clean water for everyone.
Communication and Technology: High-speed, low-latency communication networks and energy-efficient devices would be used to connect people and devices seamlessly.
Healthcare: Advanced medical technologies and personalized medicine would improve healthcare outcomes while minimizing environmental impact.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 3190 would be required in any area where human activity interacts with the environment. It would be a fundamental part of how society functions, ensuring that resources are used responsibly and that the planet is protected for future generations.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3190 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology is needed in 3190, but how it’s implemented and integrated into society. Here are some key aspects of how sustainable technology would be “required” in 3190:

1. Policy and Regulation:

Mandates and Standards: Governments would likely have strict regulations and standards in place, mandating the use of sustainable technologies in all sectors, from energy production and transportation to manufacturing and agriculture.
Incentives and Support: Governments would also provide incentives and support for the development and adoption of sustainable technologies, such as tax breaks, subsidies, and research funding.
International Cooperation: Global agreements and collaborations would ensure that sustainability standards are enforced worldwide, preventing a “race to the bottom” where companies move to countries with lax regulations.

2. Economic Drivers:

Cost-Effectiveness: Sustainable technologies would be economically viable, offering cost savings and competitive advantages over traditional, unsustainable alternatives.
Market Demand: Consumers would actively seek out sustainable products and services, driving businesses to adopt eco-friendly practices to meet this demand.
Investment and Finance: Investors would prioritize companies with strong sustainability performance, making it easier for them to access capital and grow.

3. Social and Cultural Norms:

Education and Awareness: Sustainability would be a core part of education, fostering a deep understanding of its importance for the well-being of the planet and future generations.
Community Initiatives: Communities would play an active role in promoting sustainable living, organizing initiatives like recycling programs, community gardens, and renewable energy projects.
Ethical Considerations: Sustainability would be seen as an ethical imperative, with individuals and organizations feeling a sense of responsibility to protect the environment and conserve resources.

4. Technological Advancements:

Innovation and Efficiency: Continuous innovation would lead to even more efficient and sustainable technologies, making them more accessible and affordable.
Integration and Automation: Sustainable technologies would be seamlessly integrated into various aspects of life, from smart homes and cities to automated transportation systems and manufacturing processes.
Resilience and Adaptability: Sustainable technologies would be designed to be resilient to climate change and other environmental challenges, ensuring that societies can adapt to changing conditions.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3190 would be “required” through a combination of top-down regulations, bottom-up demand, economic incentives, and technological advancements. It would be a fundamental part of how society functions, driven by a collective understanding of its importance for the long-term well-being of the planet and future generations.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3190 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 3190, as that’s far in the future! However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on extrapolating current trends and imagining the advancements that might occur. This allows us to explore the kinds of case studies that might exist then.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Ganges River Basin, 3190

Background: By the early 22nd century, despite progress, the Ganges River Basin faced ongoing challenges: residual pollution from past industrial practices, the impacts of climate change (altered monsoon patterns, glacial melt), and the needs of a large and growing population. Traditional “solutions” had proven insufficient.

The 3190 Solution: Integrated Eco-Technological Harmony

The revitalization of the Ganges in 3190 wasn’t about a single “fix” but a holistic, integrated approach combining several advanced sustainable technologies:

Advanced Bioremediation: Genetically engineered microorganisms, housed within self-sustaining, AI-monitored floating “bio-islands,” break down complex pollutants at the molecular level. These organisms are designed to be highly specific, targeting only the pollutants while leaving the natural ecosystem undisturbed. The AI constantly adjusts the bio-islands’ operations based on real-time water quality data.
Adaptive Infrastructure: “Living” infrastructure, incorporating bio-concrete and self-healing materials, manages water flow. These structures adapt to changing water levels and prevent erosion while also providing habitat for aquatic life. They’re grown, not built in the traditional sense, minimizing the carbon footprint of their creation.
Atmospheric Water Generation: Advanced atmospheric water generators, powered by localized renewable energy sources (likely a combination of advanced solar and kinetic energy harvesting from the river itself), provide clean water for agriculture and domestic use, reducing reliance on river water and allowing for ecological restoration. These generators are highly efficient and minimize energy consumption.
Precision Agriculture and Vertical Farms: Highly efficient vertical farms, utilizing AI-controlled environments and closed-loop hydroponic systems, minimize water usage and fertilizer runoff. Precision agriculture techniques, employing nanosensors in the soil, optimize irrigation and nutrient delivery, further reducing the impact on the river.
Closed-Loop Industrial Systems: Manufacturing facilities within the basin operate on closed-loop systems, minimizing waste and pollution. Materials are recycled and reused extensively, and any remaining byproducts are processed into useful resources.

Results:

Water Quality: The Ganges is restored to a pristine state, supporting a thriving ecosystem.
Biodiversity: Native fish and other aquatic species return to the river.
Economic Growth: Sustainable agriculture and eco-tourism create new economic opportunities for local communities.
Resilience: The basin is more resilient to the impacts of climate change, able to adapt to changing weather patterns and water availability.

Lessons Learned (from our hypothetical future):

Holistic Approach: Sustainable solutions are rarely single-point fixes. Integrated approaches that address multiple challenges simultaneously are essential.
Technological Synergy: Combining different advanced technologies can create synergistic effects, amplifying their impact.
Adaptive Management: Continuous monitoring and adaptation are crucial for ensuring the long-term effectiveness of sustainable solutions.
Community Involvement: Local communities must be involved in the design and implementation of sustainable solutions to ensure their long-term success.

This hypothetical case study illustrates the kind of complex, integrated, and technologically advanced solutions that might be employed in 3190 to achieve true sustainability. It highlights the importance of thinking beyond single technologies and focusing on systemic change.Sources and related conte

COURTESY : Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3190 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3190 – A Vision for a Harmonious Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3190, extrapolating from current trends and envisioning the advancements necessary to achieve a truly sustainable future. It examines key technological domains, societal shifts, and the integrated approaches required to address the complex challenges of the coming centuries. This document serves as a starting point for discussion and exploration, recognizing that the future remains, in many ways, unwritten.

1. Introduction:

The 22nd century and beyond will demand radical changes in how humanity interacts with its planet. Climate change, resource depletion, and the needs of a growing global population will necessitate a complete paradigm shift towards sustainability. This paper posits that by 3190, sustainable technology will be deeply interwoven into the fabric of civilization, not as a separate field, but as the foundational principle guiding all technological development and societal practices.

2. Key Technological Domains:

Energy: Complete transition to renewable energy sources (advanced solar, wind, geothermal, and potentially new, yet undiscovered sources). Highly efficient energy storage solutions (perhaps based on room-temperature superconductors or other breakthrough technologies) will ensure grid stability and eliminate reliance on fossil fuels. Localized, micro-grids will enhance resilience and reduce transmission losses.
Materials Science: Development of advanced materials with unique properties: self-healing materials, bio-integrated materials, and materials derived from recycled or sustainably sourced resources. Nanotechnology will enable the creation of materials tailored to specific needs, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.
Manufacturing: Advanced manufacturing techniques like 4D printing (where objects can change shape over time) and biomanufacturing (growing materials and products) will revolutionize production, minimizing waste and enabling on-demand manufacturing. Closed-loop systems will ensure that materials are recycled and reused endlessly.
Agriculture and Food Production: Vertical farms, precision agriculture, and lab-grown meat will drastically reduce land and water usage while increasing food production. Genetically engineered crops will be more resilient to climate change and require fewer pesticides.
Water Management: Advanced water purification and desalination technologies, powered by renewable energy, will ensure access to clean water for all. Atmospheric water generation will supplement traditional water sources, particularly in arid regions.
Transportation: Electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles, and high-speed rail will dominate transportation, powered by clean energy sources. Advanced traffic management systems will optimize traffic flow and reduce congestion. Personal air mobility (flying vehicles) may become commonplace, but with strict regulations and sustainable energy sources.
Information and Communication Technology (ICT): Highly energy-efficient computing, quantum computing, and advanced AI will drive innovation in all other fields. Seamless integration of technology into daily life will enhance communication, collaboration, and access to information.
Biotechnology and Medicine: Personalized medicine, gene editing, and advanced diagnostics will revolutionize healthcare. Bioprinting of organs and tissues will eliminate the need for transplants. AI-powered healthcare systems will provide personalized care and preventative medicine.

3. Societal Shifts:

Circular Economy: A transition to a circular economy where resources are used and reused endlessly, minimizing waste and pollution.
Sustainable Consumption: A shift in consumer behavior towards sustainable products and services, driven by education and awareness.
Global Cooperation: Increased international cooperation to address global challenges like climate change and resource depletion.
Ethical Considerations: A strong emphasis on ethical considerations in the development and use of technology, ensuring that it benefits all of humanity and protects the environment.

4. Integrated Approaches:

Systems Thinking: Recognizing the interconnectedness of different systems and adopting holistic approaches to problem-solving.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Collaboration between scientists, engineers, policymakers, and other stakeholders to develop and implement sustainable solutions.
Adaptive Management: Continuous monitoring and adaptation of sustainable technologies to ensure their effectiveness in the face of changing conditions.

5. Challenges and Opportunities:

Technological Development: Continued investment in research and development is crucial for achieving the vision of a sustainable future.
Policy and Regulation: Governments must play a key role in creating a regulatory framework that supports sustainable practices.
Social and Cultural Change: Shifting societal attitudes and behaviors towards sustainability is essential for long-term success.

6. Conclusion:

The year 3190 presents both immense challenges and incredible opportunities. By embracing sustainable technology, fostering global cooperation, and prioritizing ethical considerations, humanity can create a future where both people and the planet thrive. This vision requires a long-term perspective, a commitment to innovation, and a fundamental shift in how we think about our relationship with the world around us. This white paper serves as a call to action, urging us to begin building that sustainable future today.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3190 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine how sustainable technology might be applied in industries in 3190! Here are some potential examples, building on the trends we see today:

1. Manufacturing:

Personalized, On-Demand Production: Advanced 4D printing and biomanufacturing would allow for highly personalized products to be created on demand, minimizing waste and transportation costs. Imagine ordering a new piece of furniture and having it “grown” in your home using bio-integrated materials!
Closed-Loop Systems: Factories would operate on closed-loop systems, where all materials are recycled and reused endlessly. Waste would be a thing of the past, and pollution would be virtually eliminated.
AI-Powered Optimization: AI systems would monitor and optimize every aspect of the manufacturing process, from energy usage to material flow, ensuring maximum efficiency and minimizing environmental impact.

2. Energy:

Localized Microgrids: Industries would rely on localized microgrids powered by a mix of renewable energy sources, such as advanced solar, wind, and geothermal. This would increase resilience and reduce transmission losses.
Energy Harvesting: Factories might incorporate energy harvesting technologies to capture waste heat, vibrations, and other forms of energy, further reducing their reliance on external power sources.
Advanced Energy Storage: Breakthrough energy storage solutions would allow industries to store excess renewable energy and use it when needed, ensuring a stable and reliable power supply.

3. Agriculture:

Vertical Farms: Urban centers might have large-scale vertical farms that produce fresh fruits and vegetables locally, reducing transportation costs and the need for pesticides.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI would be used to monitor soil conditions, water usage, and plant health, optimizing resource allocation and minimizing environmental impact.
Lab-Grown Meat: Industries might produce lab-grown meat and other protein sources, reducing the need for traditional animal agriculture and its associated environmental impacts.

4. Construction:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure would be constructed using self-healing materials that can repair themselves, extending their lifespan and reducing maintenance costs.
Bio-Integrated Materials: Construction might utilize bio-integrated materials that are grown rather than manufactured, reducing the carbon footprint of building construction.
Modular and Adaptable Buildings: Buildings could be designed to be modular and adaptable, allowing them to be easily reconfigured or repurposed as needs change.

5. Transportation:

Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving electric vehicles would be used for transporting goods and materials, optimizing logistics and reducing emissions.
Hyperloop Systems: High-speed hyperloop systems could connect industrial centers, allowing for rapid and efficient transportation of goods over long distances.
Sustainable Aviation: The aviation industry might rely on biofuels or other sustainable energy sources to power aircraft, reducing the environmental impact of air travel.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could be applied in industries in 3190. The possibilities are vast, and the only limit is our imagination. By embracing innovation and prioritizing sustainability, we can create a future where industries operate in harmony with the environment, creating a prosperous and sustainable world for all.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3190 ?

It’s exciting to think about the kind of research and development that might be happening in 3190 to advance sustainable technology! Here are some potential areas of focus, building on current scientific frontiers:

1. Advanced Energy Technologies:

Exotic Energy Sources: Researchers might be exploring and harnessing new energy sources beyond solar, wind, and geothermal. This could involve tapping into zero-point energy, utilizing advanced fusion reactors, or even discovering entirely new forms of energy.
Ultra-Efficient Energy Conversion: Scientists might be developing technologies that can convert energy from one form to another with near-perfect efficiency, minimizing energy loss and maximizing resource utilization.
Wireless Energy Transmission: Imagine a world where energy can be transmitted wirelessly over long distances with minimal loss. This could revolutionize how we power our homes, cities, and even vehicles.

2. Materials Science Breakthroughs:

Programmable Matter: Researchers might be developing programmable matter, materials that can change their properties on demand. This could enable the creation of self-healing structures, adaptive materials, and even objects that can transform into different tools or devices.
Bio-Integrated Materials: Scientists might be growing materials with specific properties, such as strength, flexibility, or conductivity, using biological processes. This could lead to the development of sustainable and environmentally friendly materials for construction, manufacturing, and other applications.
Nanomaterials: Continued research in nanotechnology could lead to the development of nanomaterials with unique properties, such as super-strength, superconductivity, or the ability to capture and store energy.

3. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing:

Synthetic Biology: Scientists might be able to design and engineer new biological systems with specific functions, such as producing biofuels, breaking down pollutants, or even creating new types of materials.
Bioprinting: Advanced bioprinting techniques could enable the creation of complex structures, such as organs and tissues, using biological materials. This could revolutionize medicine and eliminate the need for organ transplants.
Genetic Engineering: Continued advancements in genetic engineering could lead to the development of crops that are more resilient to climate change, require fewer resources, and produce higher yields.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Computing:

Neuromorphic Computing: Researchers might be developing computers that mimic the structure and function of the human brain, enabling them to process information more efficiently and learn from their experiences.
Quantum Computing: Quantum computers could revolutionize fields like materials science, drug discovery, and artificial intelligence by enabling the simulation of complex systems and the solution of problems that are currently intractable.
AI for Sustainability: AI systems could be used to optimize energy grids, manage resources, and monitor environmental conditions, helping us to create a more sustainable world.

5. Space Exploration and Resource Utilization:

Asteroid Mining: Scientists might be developing technologies to mine asteroids for valuable resources, such as rare earth minerals and precious metals, reducing our reliance on terrestrial mining.
Space-Based Solar Power: Researchers could be exploring the possibility of harvesting solar energy in space and transmitting it back to Earth, providing a clean and abundant source of energy.
Terraforming: In the long term, scientists might be researching the possibility of terraforming other planets, making them habitable for humans and expanding our living space beyond Earth.

These are just a few examples of the kind of research and development that might be happening in 3190 to advance sustainable technology. The possibilities are vast, and the future is full of potential. By continuing to push the boundaries of science and technology, we can create a world where both humanity and the planet thrive.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.