Sustainable Technology of 3180

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 3180 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3180 ?

Sustainable technology in 3180 could encompass a wide range of advancements, potentially including:

  • Advanced Energy Systems: Fusion power, space-based solar energy, or highly efficient energy storage solutions.
  • Resource Management: Technologies for extracting resources from space or the ocean, advanced recycling systems, or methods for creating sustainable materials.
  • Environmental Remediation: Technologies for cleaning up pollution, restoring ecosystems, or even reversing climate change.  
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Vertical farms, lab-grown meat, or precision agriculture techniques that minimize environmental impact.
  • Transportation: Hyperloop systems, flying cars, or other forms of transportation that are highly efficient and have minimal emissions.
  • Smart Cities: Urban environments designed for sustainability, with integrated systems for energy management, waste disposal, and resource conservation.  
  • Biotechnology: Advances in genetic engineering or synthetic biology that could lead to sustainable solutions in medicine, agriculture, or manufacturing.  
  • Artificial Intelligence: AI systems that can optimize resource use, manage complex systems, and develop new sustainable technologies.  

It’s important to note that this is just a speculative list, and the actual sustainable technologies of 3180 could be very different. However, it’s likely that they will be focused on addressing the challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 3180 ?

Sustainable technology in 3180 is a fascinating topic to consider! While it’s impossible to know for sure what technologies will exist that far in the future, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential advancements. Here are some possibilities:

1. Energy:

  • Fusion Power: By 3180, we might have mastered nuclear fusion, providing clean and abundant energy.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Huge solar arrays in orbit could beam energy down to Earth, providing a constant source of renewable energy.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and long-lasting batteries or other storage solutions could make renewable energy sources like solar and wind power more reliable.  

2. Resource Management:

  • Space Mining: Asteroids and other celestial bodies could be mined for valuable resources, reducing our reliance on Earth’s finite supply.  
  • Ocean Mining: Advanced technologies could allow us to sustainably extract resources from the oceans.
  • Closed-Loop Recycling: Highly efficient recycling systems could allow us to reuse almost all materials, minimizing waste and the need for new resources.
  • Sustainable Materials: New materials could be developed that are biodegradable, easily recycled, or made from abundant and renewable resources.

3. Environmental Remediation:

  • Climate Engineering: Technologies could be developed to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere or to reflect sunlight back into space, helping to reverse climate change.
  • Pollution Cleanup: Advanced technologies could be used to clean up existing pollution in the air, water, and soil.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: We might have developed methods to restore damaged ecosystems and even bring back extinct species.

4. Sustainable Agriculture:

  • Vertical Farms: Multi-story farms could be built in urban areas, reducing the need for transportation and land use.
  • Lab-Grown Meat: Meat could be grown in labs, reducing the environmental impact of traditional animal agriculture.  
  • Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and data analysis could be used to optimize crop yields while minimizing the use of water, fertilizer, and pesticides.  

5. Transportation:

  • Hyperloop: High-speed transportation systems could be built in tubes, allowing people to travel long distances quickly and efficiently.  
  • Flying Cars: Electric or other clean-energy flying vehicles could become commonplace, reducing traffic congestion and pollution.
  • Advanced Public Transportation: Cities could have highly efficient and integrated public transportation systems, making it easy for people to get around without cars.

6. Smart Cities:

  • Integrated Systems: Cities could be designed with integrated systems for energy management, waste disposal, and resource conservation.
  • Data-Driven Optimization: AI and other technologies could be used to optimize city operations and make them more sustainable.

7. Biotechnology:

  • Genetic Engineering: Advances in genetic engineering could lead to crops that are more resistant to pests and drought, or to microorganisms that can clean up pollution.
  • Synthetic Biology: We might be able to design new biological systems that can produce sustainable fuels, materials, or medicines.

8. Artificial Intelligence:

  • Optimization: AI could be used to optimize resource use in all areas of society, from energy production to manufacturing.  
  • Complex Systems Management: AI could be used to manage complex systems like power grids or transportation networks, making them more efficient and sustainable.  
  • New Technology Development: AI could even be used to develop new sustainable technologies.

It’s important to remember that this is just a speculative list. The actual sustainable technologies of 3180 could be very different. However, it’s likely that they will be focused on addressing the challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3180 ?

It’s interesting to think about who would need sustainable technology in 3180! Here’s a breakdown of potential stakeholders:

  • Humanity: This is the most obvious answer. By 3180, humanity might have spread across the solar system or even beyond. Sustainable technology would be crucial for survival and maintaining a good quality of life in diverse environments.
  • Future Civilizations: If there are other intelligent species out there, they would likely have their own need for sustainable technology, whether they are on Earth or elsewhere in the universe.
  • Ecosystems: Even in 3180, it’s likely that humans would still rely on healthy ecosystems for resources and well-being. Sustainable technology would be needed to protect and maintain these ecosystems.
  • Artificial Intelligences: Advanced AI systems might become increasingly important in the future. They would need sustainable technology to power their operations and to ensure their own long-term existence.
  • Planetary Systems: If humans are living on other planets or in space habitats, sustainable technology would be essential for creating and maintaining habitable environments.

Essentially, anyone or anything that needs resources, energy, and a stable environment would be a stakeholder in sustainable technology in 3180. This could include individuals, communities, nations, corporations, and even entire planets!

It’s also worth noting that the concept of “need” might evolve over time. In 3180, there might be new needs that we can’t even imagine today. Sustainable technology would need to be adaptable and innovative to meet these changing needs.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3180 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will be like in 3180, but also when it will be needed. Here’s a breakdown:

  • Now (and the immediate future): We need sustainable technology now to address the urgent challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. The sooner we develop and implement these technologies, the better chance we have of mitigating these problems.
  • The coming decades and centuries: As human civilization expands and technology advances, our need for sustainable solutions will only increase. We’ll need to find ways to power our societies, produce food, and manage resources without damaging the planet.
  • The distant future (like 3180): By 3180, sustainable technology will likely be absolutely essential for survival. Humanity might have colonized other planets or be living in space, and we’ll need advanced technologies to create and maintain habitable environments. We might also encounter new challenges that we can’t even imagine today, and sustainable technology will be crucial for overcoming them.

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology is ongoing. It’s not something we can solve once and then forget about. It’s a continuous process of innovation and adaptation that will be necessary for the long-term well-being of humanity and the planet.

Think of it like this: sustainable technology is like a toolkit that we need to keep developing and refining. We need to use the tools we have now to address current problems, and we need to keep building new tools to prepare for the challenges of the future.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3180 ?

This is where it gets really interesting! Thinking about where sustainable technology might be needed in 3180 opens up some exciting possibilities:

  • Earth: Even in 3180, Earth will likely still be a major hub for humanity. Sustainable technology will be needed to maintain its ecosystems, manage resources, and ensure a healthy environment for all.
  • Other Planets: If humans have colonized other planets, sustainable technology will be crucial for creating habitable environments. This could involve terraforming, building artificial habitats, or developing closed-loop systems for resource management.
  • Space Habitats: Large space stations or orbital colonies would need sustainable technology to provide life support, energy, and resources for their inhabitants.
  • Asteroids and Moons: Mining operations on asteroids or moons would require sustainable technology to extract resources without depleting these celestial bodies.
  • Deep Space: If humans venture further into space, sustainable technology will be needed to support long-duration missions and potentially even interstellar travel.
  • Underwater Habitats: The oceans could be another frontier for human expansion. Sustainable technology would be needed to create underwater habitats and sustainably utilize ocean resources.
  • Virtual Worlds: In 3180, virtual reality might be highly advanced. Even in virtual worlds, sustainable technology could be needed to manage energy consumption and ensure the long-term viability of these digital environments.

Essentially, anywhere humans might live or explore in 3180 will likely require sustainable technology. This could include:

  • Urban Centers: Cities of the future will need to be highly efficient and sustainable, with integrated systems for energy management, waste disposal, and resource conservation.
  • Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture and resource management will be crucial for maintaining food production and supporting human populations in rural areas.
  • Transportation Networks: Sustainable transportation systems will be needed to connect different communities and facilitate the movement of people and goods.
  • Research Facilities: Scientific research will play a key role in developing new sustainable technologies and understanding the universe. Sustainable technology will be needed to power these facilities and minimize their environmental impact.

It’s important to remember that the specific locations where sustainable technology will be needed in 3180 will depend on how humanity evolves and expands. But it’s safe to say that the need for sustainable solutions will be widespread and essential for the long-term future.

You stopped this response

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3180 ?

This is where we get into some really fascinating speculation! How sustainable technology is required in 3180 is likely to be very different from how we think about it today. Here are some possibilities:

  • Autonomous Systems: By 3180, many systems might be highly automated and self-regulating. Sustainable technology would need to be built into these systems at a fundamental level, so they can manage resources, minimize waste, and adapt to changing conditions without constant human intervention.
  • Closed-Loop Systems: To achieve true sustainability, we’ll likely need to create closed-loop systems for everything from resource extraction to manufacturing to waste disposal. This means that materials are constantly recycled and reused, and waste is minimized or eliminated altogether.  
  • Adaptive Technology: The world of 3180 might be very different from today. We might be living on other planets, exploring deep space, or facing new environmental challenges. Sustainable technology would need to be highly adaptable to these changing circumstances, able to adjust to new environments and solve unforeseen problems.
  • Integrated Networks: In the future, different technologies might be highly interconnected. For example, energy systems might be linked to transportation networks, which are linked to agricultural systems, and so on. Sustainable technology would need to be integrated into these networks, ensuring that they operate efficiently and minimize their overall impact.
  • Biological Integration: Biotechnology could play a major role in sustainable technology in 3180. We might see technologies that are integrated with living organisms, such as plants that can clean up pollution or microorganisms that can produce sustainable fuels.
  • Decentralized Systems: In some ways, sustainable technology might become more decentralized. We might see communities or even individuals having their own small-scale systems for energy production, food production, and resource management.
  • AI and Machine Learning: Advanced AI systems could play a crucial role in managing and optimizing sustainable technology. AI could be used to analyze data, predict future needs, and develop new solutions to sustainability challenges.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 3180 would need to be:

  • Autonomous: Able to operate and adapt with minimal human intervention.
  • Closed-loop: Designed to minimize waste and maximize resource reuse.  
  • Adaptive: Able to adjust to changing environments and solve new problems.
  • Integrated: Connected to other technologies and systems for optimal efficiency.
  • Biologically integrated: Working in harmony with living organisms.
  • Decentralized: Empowering individuals and communities to manage their own resources.
  • AI-driven: Utilizing artificial intelligence for optimization and innovation.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual ways in which sustainable technology will be required in 3180 could be very different. But by thinking about these possibilities, we can start to imagine what a truly sustainable future might look like.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3180 ?

It’s tough to provide a specific case study for sustainable technology in 3180, as that’s far beyond our current understanding. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential future advancements. Here’s an example:

Case Study: The Martian Terraforming Project – 3180

Background: By 3180, humanity has established a permanent colony on Mars. However, the planet’s atmosphere is thin and unbreathable, and temperatures are extremely cold. To make Mars more habitable, a massive terraforming project is underway.  

Challenge: The primary challenge is to create a self-sustaining ecosystem on Mars, including a breathable atmosphere, liquid water on the surface, and fertile soil for growing food.

Sustainable Technology Solutions:

  • Atmospheric Modification:
    • Advanced Greenhouse Gases: Genetically engineered microorganisms are released into the Martian atmosphere. These microbes produce powerful greenhouse gases that trap heat and thicken the atmosphere.
    • Solar Reflectors: Giant mirrors in orbit around Mars reflect sunlight onto the planet’s surface, further warming the atmosphere and melting polar ice caps.
  • Water Management:
    • Ice Mining: Automated robots mine subsurface ice deposits and transport them to the surface, creating lakes and rivers.
    • Atmospheric Water Extraction: Advanced technology extracts water vapor from the atmosphere and condenses it into liquid water.  
  • Soil Creation:
    • Regolith Modification: Martian regolith (soil) is treated with genetically engineered bacteria that break down minerals and create fertile soil.
    • Nutrient Recycling: A closed-loop system recycles nutrients from organic waste and dead plant matter, enriching the soil and supporting agriculture.  
  • Energy Production:
    • Fusion Reactors: Fusion power plants provide clean and abundant energy for the terraforming project and the Martian colony.
    • Space-Based Solar Power: Solar energy is beamed down to Mars from orbiting solar arrays, supplementing fusion power.
  • Ecosystem Development:
    • Pioneer Species: Genetically modified plants and microorganisms are introduced to Mars to create the first stages of a self-sustaining ecosystem.
    • Controlled Environments: Large, enclosed habitats are created to provide controlled environments for growing food and raising animals.

Results:

  • Over several centuries, the Martian atmosphere becomes thicker and warmer, allowing liquid water to exist on the surface.
  • Fertile soil is created, enabling the cultivation of a wide range of crops.
  • A self-sustaining ecosystem develops, with plants, animals, and microorganisms interacting in a balanced way.
  • Mars becomes a more habitable planet, allowing for further human expansion and exploration.

Lessons Learned:

  • The Martian terraforming project demonstrates the potential of sustainable technology to transform entire planets and create new opportunities for human civilization.
  • It highlights the importance of long-term planning and international cooperation in addressing global challenges.
  • It shows that sustainable technology can be used to not only solve environmental problems but also to create a better future for humanity.

This is just one possible case study, of course. The actual sustainable technologies of 3180 could be very different. But by imagining these scenarios, we can start to think about the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead, and how we can use technology to create a more sustainable future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3180 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3180: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3180, a future vastly different from our own. It acknowledges the speculative nature of predicting technological advancements over such a long timescale but aims to stimulate thought and discussion about the critical role of sustainability in shaping our long-term destiny. By examining potential future challenges and extrapolating current technological trends, we can envision a world where advanced, integrated, and adaptive sustainable technologies are not just desirable, but essential for survival and prosperity.

1. Introduction:

The challenges facing humanity today – climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation – underscore the urgent need for sustainable solutions. Looking ahead to 3180, we can anticipate these challenges will either be overcome through proactive development and implementation of sustainable technologies, or they will have fundamentally altered human civilization. This paper assumes the former, envisioning a future where sustainability is deeply woven into the fabric of society.

2. Guiding Principles:

Sustainable technology in 3180 will likely be built upon the following core principles:

  • Regenerative Systems: Moving beyond simply minimizing harm, technologies will focus on actively restoring and enhancing ecosystems.
  • Circular Economy: Closed-loop systems will eliminate waste by maximizing resource reuse and recycling.
  • Decentralization: Localized and distributed systems for energy production, resource management, and even manufacturing will empower communities and reduce reliance on centralized infrastructure.
  • Symbiotic Integration: Technologies will be designed to work in harmony with natural systems, mimicking and enhancing natural processes.
  • Adaptive Intelligence: AI and machine learning will play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, predicting environmental changes, and adapting technologies to evolving needs.

3. Key Technology Areas:

  • Energy: Fusion power, space-based solar energy, and highly advanced energy storage solutions will provide clean and abundant energy. Micro-reactors and localized energy grids will offer resilience and adaptability.
  • Resource Management: Advanced space mining and ocean resource extraction will supplement terrestrial resources. Nanotechnology will enable the creation of new materials from abundant elements, and advanced recycling systems will achieve near-total material recovery.
  • Environmental Remediation: Geoengineering technologies, combined with ecosystem restoration techniques, will actively reverse the effects of past environmental damage. Genetically engineered microorganisms may play a role in cleaning up pollution and restoring degraded ecosystems.
  • Food Production: Vertical farms, lab-grown meat, and personalized nutrition systems will provide sustainable and efficient food production, minimizing land use and environmental impact. Precision agriculture enhanced by AI will optimize crop yields and resource utilization.
  • Manufacturing & Construction: Additive manufacturing (3D printing) using recycled and bio-derived materials will enable on-demand production and localized manufacturing. Self-healing materials and adaptive structures will enhance durability and reduce maintenance needs.
  • Transportation: Hyperloop systems, autonomous electric vehicles, and potentially even advanced air mobility solutions will provide efficient and sustainable transportation options. Personalized transportation pods will optimize individual mobility while minimizing energy consumption.
  • Information & Communication: Highly efficient and interconnected communication networks will facilitate global collaboration and knowledge sharing. Brain-computer interfaces and augmented reality technologies may fundamentally change how humans interact with technology and the world around them.

4. Societal Implications:

The widespread adoption of advanced sustainable technologies will have profound implications for society in 3180:

  • Enhanced Quality of Life: Abundant resources, clean energy, and a healthy environment will contribute to a higher quality of life for all.
  • Global Equity: Decentralized systems and access to essential resources will reduce inequalities and promote global equity.
  • Space Exploration & Colonization: Sustainable technologies will enable further exploration of space and the establishment of self-sustaining colonies on other planets.
  • Human Augmentation: Biotechnology and nanotechnology may offer opportunities for human enhancement, raising ethical considerations that will need careful consideration.

5. Challenges & Opportunities:

Developing and implementing the sustainable technologies envisioned for 3180 presents significant challenges:

  • Scientific Breakthroughs: Significant scientific advancements will be required in areas like fusion energy, nanotechnology, and biotechnology.
  • Ethical Considerations: Careful consideration must be given to the ethical implications of advanced technologies, particularly in areas like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence.
  • Global Cooperation: International collaboration will be essential to address global challenges and ensure equitable access to sustainable technologies.

Despite these challenges, the opportunities are immense. By embracing innovation and prioritizing sustainability, we can create a future where humanity thrives in harmony with the planet and potentially even beyond.

6. Conclusion:

While the specific technologies described in this paper are speculative, the underlying need for sustainable solutions is not. By starting the conversation now about the long-term future of sustainable technology, we can begin to lay the groundwork for a thriving civilization in 3180 and beyond. This requires not only scientific innovation but also a fundamental shift in our values and a commitment to building a more just and sustainable world for all.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3180 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3180! Here are some possibilities, extrapolating from current trends and considering potential advancements:

1. Advanced Manufacturing & Production:

  • Nanofactories: Imagine factories at the nanoscale, able to manipulate individual atoms and molecules to create materials and products with unprecedented precision and efficiency. These nanofactories could use abundant resources and produce minimal waste, revolutionizing manufacturing.
  • Bio-Integrated Manufacturing: Industries might utilize biological systems to produce materials, pharmaceuticals, and even complex products. Genetically engineered organisms could be used to grow materials with specific properties or to synthesize complex molecules with minimal environmental impact.  
  • 3D Printing at Macro and Micro Scales: Advanced 3D printing could allow for the creation of everything from buildings to personalized devices, using recycled or bio-derived materials. This could enable on-demand production and localized manufacturing, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.  

2. Resource Extraction & Processing:

  • Space Mining with Autonomous Robots: Mining operations on asteroids and other celestial bodies could be carried out by fleets of autonomous robots, minimizing the need for human presence in space. These robots could use advanced AI to identify and extract valuable resources sustainably.
  • Ocean Resource Extraction with Minimal Impact: Submersible vehicles and advanced sensors could be used to sustainably extract resources from the oceans, such as minerals, rare earth elements, and even energy from ocean currents.
  • Closed-Loop Recycling Facilities: Highly efficient recycling facilities could be developed that can break down materials at the molecular level and reuse them to create new products. This could significantly reduce the need for new resource extraction.

3. Energy Production & Distribution:

  • Fusion Power Plants: Fusion energy, if mastered, could provide a clean and abundant source of power for industries. Fusion reactors could be built at various scales, from powering entire cities to providing energy for individual factories.  
  • Space-Based Solar Energy Infrastructure: Large solar arrays in orbit could beam energy down to Earth, providing a constant source of renewable energy for industrial use. This could power energy-intensive industries like manufacturing and resource processing.
  • Decentralized Energy Grids: Industries might rely on localized and distributed energy grids, powered by a mix of renewable sources like solar, wind, and geothermal. This could increase resilience and reduce reliance on centralized power plants.

4. Environmental Remediation & Restoration:

  • Advanced Pollution Cleanup Technologies: Industries could use advanced technologies to clean up existing pollution in the air, water, and soil. This could involve using nanomaterials to absorb pollutants or genetically engineered microorganisms to break down toxins.
  • Ecosystem Restoration Projects: Industries could invest in large-scale ecosystem restoration projects, such as reforestation, wetland creation, and coral reef restoration. This could help to mitigate the impact of past industrial activities and create a healthier environment.
  • Climate Engineering Technologies: Some industries might be involved in developing and deploying climate engineering technologies, such as carbon capture and storage or solar radiation management, to help mitigate climate change.

5. Infrastructure Development & Maintenance:

  • Self-Healing Materials: Industries could use self-healing materials in construction and infrastructure development. These materials could automatically repair damage, reducing maintenance costs and extending the lifespan of structures.  
  • Adaptive Infrastructure: Infrastructure could be designed to be adaptive and responsive to changing conditions. For example, bridges could be built with sensors that monitor their structural integrity and adjust their configuration in response to environmental factors.  
  • Smart Cities Technologies: Industries could contribute to the development of smart city technologies, such as intelligent transportation systems, energy-efficient buildings, and waste management systems. This could help to create more sustainable and livable urban environments.

These are just a few examples of the potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3180. As technology continues to advance, we can expect to see even more innovative and transformative applications emerge. By embracing sustainability as a core principle, industries can not only reduce their environmental impact but also create new opportunities for growth and innovation.   Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3180 ?

You’re asking about the very cutting edge of speculation! Research and development for sustainable technology in 3180 would be a long-term, ongoing endeavor, building upon advancements made over centuries. Here’s how it might function:

1. Global Research Network:

  • Interconnected Institutions: Imagine a vast network of research institutions, universities, and private labs spanning the globe (and potentially even beyond Earth). These entities would collaborate and share knowledge freely, accelerating the pace of innovation.
  • Open-Source Innovation: A strong emphasis on open-source research and development would ensure that discoveries are readily available to everyone, fostering collaboration and preventing monopolies on crucial technologies.
  • Citizen Science: Advanced communication technologies and AI assistants could empower individuals to participate in research, contributing data, ideas, and even developing their own sustainable solutions.

2. Advanced Research Tools:

  • AI-Powered Laboratories: AI systems would play a central role in research, automating experiments, analyzing massive datasets, and even designing new technologies. Imagine AI researchers working alongside human scientists, pushing the boundaries of what’s possible.
  • Virtual Reality & Simulation: Researchers could use highly realistic virtual reality environments to simulate complex systems, test new technologies, and explore potential scenarios. This could significantly reduce the time and cost of traditional experimentation.
  • Quantum Computing: Quantum computers, if they become widely available, could revolutionize materials science, allowing researchers to design new materials with specific properties at the atomic level. 1 This could lead to breakthroughs in areas like energy storage, resource management, and even terraforming.   1. Outside-the-box quantum computing used for materials of the future www.avcr.cz

3. Focus Areas:

  • Fundamental Science: Continued investment in fundamental scientific research would be crucial. Understanding the underlying principles of physics, chemistry, biology, and other fields would lay the foundation for future technological advancements.
  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Sustainable technology in 3180 would likely require a highly interdisciplinary approach, with experts from different fields working together to solve complex problems. This could involve collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, and even artists and social scientists.
  • Long-Term Thinking: Research and development would need to take a long-term perspective, focusing on solutions that are not only sustainable in the short term but also have the potential to last for centuries or even millennia.

4. Ethical Considerations:

  • Responsible Innovation: Ethical considerations would be integrated into the research and development process from the very beginning. Researchers would need to carefully consider the potential impacts of their work on society and the environment.
  • Transparency and Accountability: Research would be conducted in a transparent and accountable manner, ensuring that the public is informed about new developments and has a voice in shaping the future of sustainable technology.
  • Global Governance: International agreements and institutions would be needed to ensure that sustainable technologies are developed and used responsibly, preventing unintended consequences and promoting global equity.

5. Continuous Improvement:

  • Feedback Loops: Sustainable technology in 3180 would be constantly evolving, with feedback loops built into systems to monitor their performance and identify areas for improvement.
  • Adaptability: Technologies would need to be highly adaptable, able to adjust to changing conditions and solve new problems as they arise.
  • Resilience: Systems would be designed to be resilient, able to withstand unexpected events and disruptions.

Research and development for sustainable technology in 3180 would be a massive, collaborative, and ongoing effort, driven by a deep commitment to creating a better future for humanity and the planet. It would be a process of continuous learning, innovation, and adaptation, pushing the boundaries of what’s possible while always keeping ethical considerations and long-term sustainability in mind

.COURTESY : Carnegie India

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »