Sustainable Technology of 3150

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 3150 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3150 ?

It seems you might be interested in the future of sustainable technology, perhaps even as far out as the year 3150. While predicting that far into the future is highly speculative, we can explore some potential trends and possibilities based on current advancements and challenges.

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Resource Depletion: By 3150, we may have exhausted many of the Earth’s easily accessible resources. Technologies that rely on abundant materials or rare earth minerals might become obsolete.
  • Climate Change: The long-term effects of climate change are uncertain, but it’s likely that future technologies will need to function in a significantly altered environment.
  • Energy Demands: As technology advances, our energy demands will likely increase. Future sustainable technologies must address this growing need without harming the environment.
  • Ethical Implications: Advanced technologies raise ethical questions about their use and impact on society. Future sustainable technologies will need to be developed and implemented responsibly.  

Potential Technologies:

  • Advanced Energy Sources: Fusion power, space-based solar energy, and other advanced energy sources could become viable, providing clean and abundant energy.
  • Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies that mimic natural ecosystems by recycling resources and minimizing waste could become essential.  
  • Biotechnology: Advances in genetic engineering and synthetic biology could lead to the development of sustainable materials, biofuels, and even technologies that can help restore damaged ecosystems.  
  • Nanotechnology: At the nanoscale, we might be able to create materials with unique properties that can be used for energy storage, environmental remediation, and other sustainable applications.
  • Artificial Intelligence: AI could play a key role in optimizing resource use, managing complex systems, and developing new sustainable technologies.  

Important Considerations:

  • Interconnectedness: Future sustainable technologies will likely be highly interconnected, working together to create a complex and resilient system.
  • Adaptability: Technologies will need to be adaptable to changing environmental conditions and resource availability.
  • Accessibility: Sustainable technologies should be accessible to everyone, not just a privileged few.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual technologies that emerge by 3150 could be very different from what we can imagine today. However, by focusing on sustainability, resilience, and ethical considerations, we can increase the chances of creating a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 3150 ?

Predicting sustainable technology in 3150 is a fun thought experiment! It’s so far in the future that it’s hard to be precise, but we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the challenges we might face. Here are some ideas:

Core Principles:

  • Radical Resource Efficiency: By 3150, easily accessible resources may be long gone. Technologies will likely focus on closed-loop systems that recycle and reuse everything, minimizing waste to an extreme degree.
  • Energy Independence: Dependence on fossil fuels will be a distant memory. Expect a mix of advanced renewables, perhaps space-based solar, fusion power, or even more exotic energy sources we can’t imagine yet.
  • Biomimicry: Nature will be our greatest teacher. Technologies will likely mimic biological processes for everything from energy production to materials science and even construction.
  • Hyper-Adaptability: With climate change and other environmental shifts, technologies will need to be incredibly adaptable, able to adjust to changing conditions on the fly.

Possible Technologies:

  • Matter Reconfiguration: Imagine technologies that can rearrange matter at the atomic level, allowing us to create anything we need from readily available materials, on demand.
  • Symbiotic Technologies: Perhaps technology will integrate seamlessly with living systems, with devices powered by biological processes or even becoming part of ecosystems themselves.
  • Personalized Ecosystems: Maybe we’ll have the ability to create small, self-contained ecosystems tailored to our needs, providing food, clean air, and resources in a sustainable way.
  • AI-Driven Optimization: Artificial intelligence will likely be deeply integrated into every aspect of sustainable technology, optimizing resource use, managing complex systems, and predicting potential problems before they occur.  

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Ethical Development: With such powerful technologies, ethical considerations will be paramount. How do we ensure these tools are used responsibly and for the benefit of all?
  • Resilience: Future technologies will need to be resilient against extreme weather events, resource scarcity, and other potential disruptions.
  • Accessibility: It’s crucial that sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone, not just a privileged few, to ensure a just and equitable future.

Important Note: This is highly speculative! The actual technologies of 3150 might be far more advanced and mind-boggling than anything we can imagine today. But by focusing on the principles of sustainability, resilience, and ethical development, we can increase the chances of creating a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3150 ?

That’s a great question! When we talk about sustainable technology in 3150, it’s not just about who develops it, but who needs it and who benefits from it. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Humanity as a Whole:

  • Survival: By 3150, the challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and population growth may be even more pronounced. Sustainable technology will be essential for human survival and well-being.
  • Quality of Life: Everyone will need access to clean energy, food, water, and shelter. Sustainable technology will be crucial for providing these basic necessities in an environmentally responsible way.
  • Equity: Ideally, sustainable technology should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status. This will be essential for creating a just and equitable future.

2. Ecosystems and the Planet:

  • Environmental Restoration: Sustainable technology can play a key role in restoring damaged ecosystems, cleaning up pollution, and preserving biodiversity.  
  • Planetary Health: The health of the planet is interconnected with human well-being. Sustainable technology will be essential for maintaining a healthy planet for future generations.  

3. Future Generations:

  • Resource Availability: Future generations will depend on the sustainable use of resources. Technologies that prioritize recycling, renewable energy, and minimizing waste will be essential.  
  • Habitable Planet: We have a responsibility to leave a habitable planet for future generations. Sustainable technology is crucial for ensuring that they have access to clean air, water, and a stable climate.

4. Industries and Organizations:

  • Sustainable Practices: Businesses and organizations will need to adopt sustainable technologies to reduce their environmental impact and remain competitive.  
  • Innovation: Sustainable technology can drive innovation and create new economic opportunities.  

In essence, everyone has a stake in sustainable technology in 3150. It will be essential for the survival and well-being of humanity, the health of the planet, and the prosperity of future generations.

It’s important to remember that developing and implementing sustainable technology is a collective responsibility. Governments, businesses, scientists, and individuals all have a role to play in creating a sustainable future.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3150 ?

This is a fascinating question that gets at the heart of why we should be thinking about sustainable technology now, even though we’re talking about the year 3150!

Here’s the thing: the need for sustainable technology in 3150 isn’t something that suddenly appears in that year. It’s a need that’s building now and will continue to grow. Here’s why:

  • Long-term Consequences: The decisions we make today have long-lasting effects on the environment and the planet’s resources. The way we live and consume now is setting the stage for the challenges future generations will face.  
  • Gradual Depletion: Resources are being depleted at an alarming rate. The longer we wait to develop sustainable alternatives, the fewer resources will be available for future generations.
  • Climate Change Momentum: Climate change is a complex system with a lot of inertia. Even if we drastically reduce emissions today, the effects of past emissions will continue to unfold for centuries.  
  • Technological Development: Developing truly sustainable technologies takes time. Research, innovation, and implementation all require significant effort and investment. The sooner we start, the better prepared we’ll be.

So, when is sustainable technology required?

  • Ideally, it’s required now. The sooner we prioritize sustainability, the better our chances of mitigating the challenges of the future.
  • It’s increasingly required with each passing year. As resources dwindle and the effects of climate change become more pronounced, the need for sustainable solutions becomes more urgent.  
  • It will be absolutely essential by 3150. If we don’t make significant progress towards sustainability now, the challenges faced by future generations could be insurmountable.

Thinking about sustainable technology in 3150 is a way to frame the importance of action today. It’s a reminder that our choices have consequences that extend far into the future, and that we have a responsibility to create a sustainable world for those who come after us.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Carnegie India

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3150 ?

This is a really interesting way to think about sustainable technology! It’s not just about what the technology is, but where it’s needed. Here’s a breakdown of where sustainable technology might be required in 3150:

1. Everywhere on Earth:

  • Urban Centers: Cities will likely be even more densely populated, requiring sustainable solutions for energy, waste management, transportation, and providing resources for residents.
  • Rural Areas: Sustainable technology will be needed for agriculture, resource extraction, and maintaining ecosystems in less populated regions.
  • Extreme Environments: As the climate changes, some areas may become more challenging to inhabit. Sustainable technology could make these places livable, whether it’s dealing with extreme heat, cold, or rising sea levels.
  • Underground and Underwater: Perhaps humans will have expanded into these environments. Sustainable technology would be crucial for providing breathable air, light, and resources in these non-traditional habitats.

2. Beyond Earth:

  • Space Habitats: If humanity has established settlements on other planets or in space, sustainable technology will be essential for providing life support, energy, and resources in these isolated environments.  
  • Resource Extraction: Mining asteroids or other celestial bodies could provide resources. Sustainable technology would be needed to do this with minimal environmental impact and to transport those resources back to Earth or other settlements.  
  • Space Exploration: Sustainable propulsion systems, energy sources, and life support systems will be crucial for long-duration space travel.  

3. Integrated Systems:

  • Global Networks: Sustainable technology will need to be integrated into global networks for communication, resource management, and environmental monitoring.
  • Personal Devices: Individuals will likely rely on sustainable technology in their daily lives, from personal energy devices to tools for accessing information and resources.

Key Considerations:

  • Adaptability: The specific needs for sustainable technology will vary depending on the environment. Technologies will need to be adaptable to different conditions and challenges.
  • Interconnectedness: Sustainable technologies will likely be highly interconnected, working together to create complex and resilient systems.  
  • Localization: While some technologies may be global, others will need to be localized to meet the specific needs of a particular region or community.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 3150 will be required in every environment where humans live and operate, both on Earth and beyond. It will be an integral part of daily life, ensuring access to resources, maintaining healthy ecosystems, and supporting human activities in a way that doesn’t harm the planet or future generations.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3150 ?

Ah, you’re asking about the mechanisms by which sustainable technology will be required in 3150! That’s a great question that delves into the driving forces behind this need. Here are some key factors:

1. Resource Scarcity:

  • Depletion of Finite Resources: By 3150, many of the easily accessible resources we rely on today may be significantly depleted or even exhausted. This will create a strong need for technologies that can:
    • Recycle and Reuse: Extract valuable materials from waste streams and create closed-loop systems.
    • Utilize Abundant Resources: Find ways to use readily available materials like sunlight, seawater, or common elements as building blocks for technology.
    • Minimize Consumption: Design technologies that are incredibly resource-efficient, requiring minimal raw materials.

2. Environmental Degradation:

  • Climate Change Impacts: The long-term effects of climate change will likely be severe. Sustainable technologies will be needed to:
    • Mitigate Extreme Weather: Develop infrastructure and systems that can withstand more frequent and intense storms, floods, droughts, and heatwaves.
    • Adapt to Changing Conditions: Create technologies that can function in altered environments, such as rising sea levels or shifting agricultural zones.
    • Restore Ecosystems: Implement technologies that can help repair damaged ecosystems and revitalize biodiversity.  

3. Population Growth and Urbanization:

  • Increased Demand: A growing population will place greater demands on resources and infrastructure. Sustainable technologies will be needed to:
    • Provide Essential Services: Ensure access to clean energy, water, food, and sanitation for everyone.
    • Manage Waste: Develop efficient and environmentally friendly waste management systems for densely populated areas.
    • Optimize Resource Use: Create smart systems that can optimize the distribution and use of resources in urban environments.  

4. Ethical and Social Considerations:

  • Equity and Justice: Sustainable technology will be needed to:
    • Ensure Equitable Access: Make sure that everyone has access to the benefits of sustainable technology, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.
    • Promote Social Well-being: Develop technologies that improve quality of life, health, and education for all.
    • Minimize Environmental Injustice: Address the disproportionate impact of environmental problems on marginalized communities.

5. Technological Advancement:

  • Continuous Innovation: The need for sustainable technology will drive continuous innovation and development. This will lead to:
    • More Efficient Systems: Technologies that are more efficient in their use of resources and energy.
    • New Materials and Processes: The discovery and development of new sustainable materials and manufacturing processes.
    • Integrated Solutions: Technologies that work together in complex and interconnected systems to address multiple challenges simultaneously.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology in 3150 will be driven by a combination of resource limitations, environmental pressures, social needs, and the ongoing quest for technological advancement. It will be a fundamental requirement for ensuring the survival and well-being of humanity and the health of the planet.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3150 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study for sustainable technology in 3150, as that’s over a thousand years in the future! However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on the trends and challenges we’ve discussed. This allows us to explore how such technologies might function and interact.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Integrated Aquaponic City of “Aethel” (3150)

Context: By 3150, coastal cities are largely submerged due to rising sea levels. Resources are scarce, and climate change has made traditional agriculture challenging. Aethel is a self-contained city built on a series of interconnected platforms and underwater structures.

Sustainable Technology Focus: Closed-loop resource systems, biomimicry, advanced material science, and AI-driven optimization.

Case Study Elements:

  • Aquaponic Food Production: Aethel’s primary food source comes from a massive, integrated aquaponic system. Fish are raised in underwater pens, and their waste provides nutrients for hydroponically grown crops on the platforms above. Algae farms provide additional nutrition and biofuel. Advanced sensors and AI manage the system, optimizing nutrient levels, water temperature, and other factors for maximum yield and minimal waste.  
  • Renewable Energy: Aethel is powered by a combination of sources. Ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) harnesses the temperature difference between surface and deep ocean water. Solar panels integrated into the platform structures capture sunlight. Biogas digesters process organic waste from the aquaponic system to generate additional energy.  
  • Water Management: Clean freshwater is essential. Seawater is desalinated using advanced membrane technology powered by renewable energy. Greywater from the aquaponic system and residential areas is recycled and purified for reuse. Atmospheric water generators capture moisture from the air.  
  • Material Science and Construction: Aethel’s structures are built from advanced, bio-degradable or infinitely recyclable composite materials derived from readily available resources like seaweed or rapidly growing plants. 3D printing technology allows for on-demand fabrication and customization of structures and components.  
  • Waste Management: Aethel operates on a zero-waste principle. All organic waste is composted or used in the biogas digesters. Inorganic materials are broken down and reused to create new products. Advanced filtration systems remove pollutants from the air and water.  
  • AI Integration: A central AI system manages all aspects of Aethel’s infrastructure, optimizing resource use, predicting potential problems, and adapting to changing environmental conditions. The AI also facilitates communication and resource sharing between different parts of the city.

Outcomes:

  • Self-Sufficiency: Aethel is largely self-sufficient in terms of food, energy, and water.
  • Environmental Sustainability: The city has a minimal environmental footprint, operating on closed-loop systems and utilizing renewable resources.
  • Resilience: Aethel is designed to withstand the challenges of climate change, including rising sea levels and extreme weather events.
  • Community Well-being: Residents of Aethel have access to clean resources, healthy food, and a thriving environment.

Limitations:

This is a highly simplified example. Real-world challenges would be far more complex. We haven’t addressed social and political factors, or the potential for unforeseen technological developments.

Purpose:

This hypothetical case study serves as a starting point for thinking about the possibilities and challenges of sustainable technology in the future. It highlights the importance of integrated systems, resource efficiency, and ethical considerations in creating a sustainable world.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3150 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3150: A Vision for a Resilient Future

Abstract:

Predicting the specifics of technology over a millennium into the future is inherently speculative. However, by examining current trends, potential challenges, and fundamental principles of sustainability, we can construct a plausible vision of sustainable technology in 3150. This white paper explores potential technological advancements, their underlying principles, and the societal implications of achieving a truly sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The year 3150 represents a future shaped by the cumulative impact of present-day decisions. Climate change, resource depletion, and population growth present significant challenges that must be addressed through radical innovation in sustainable technology. This paper outlines a potential landscape of such technologies, emphasizing interconnectedness, adaptability, and ethical considerations.

2. Core Principles:

Sustainable technology in 3150 will likely be built upon the following core principles:

  • Radical Resource Efficiency: Closed-loop systems that minimize waste and maximize resource reuse will be paramount. “Cradle-to-cradle” design philosophies will be ubiquitous.
  • Decentralized and Renewable Energy: Reliance on centralized power grids will be replaced by localized, renewable energy generation. Fusion power, space-based solar, and advanced geothermal are potential candidates.
  • Biomimicry and Bio-Integration: Learning from nature’s designs and processes will be crucial. Technology may even integrate with living systems, blurring the lines between the artificial and the natural.
  • Adaptive and Resilient Systems: Technologies will need to be highly adaptable to changing environmental conditions and resilient against disruptions, from extreme weather events to resource scarcity.
  • Ethical and Equitable Development: Sustainable technologies must be developed and deployed ethically, ensuring equitable access and minimizing negative social or environmental consequences.

3. Potential Technological Landscapes:

Several key technological areas are likely to be crucial:

  • Advanced Materials Science: Materials with unprecedented properties will be developed, potentially through nanotechnology or bio-inspired design. Self-healing materials, adaptive materials, and materials derived from abundant resources are possibilities.
  • Energy Generation and Storage: Advanced energy sources like fusion or space-based solar will provide clean, abundant power. Highly efficient energy storage solutions will be essential for balancing supply and demand.
  • Closed-Loop Resource Systems: Technologies for water purification, waste recycling, and resource regeneration will be highly advanced, creating circular economies at local and global scales.
  • Precision Agriculture and Food Production: Vertical farms, lab-grown meat, and other advanced food production technologies will provide sustainable and efficient food supplies for a growing population.
  • Environmental Remediation and Restoration: Technologies for removing pollutants, restoring damaged ecosystems, and even mitigating climate change effects will be essential.
  • Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI will play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, managing complex systems, and developing new sustainable technologies.

4. Societal Implications:

The widespread adoption of sustainable technology in 3150 will have profound societal implications:

  • Decentralized Communities: Localized resource production and energy generation may lead to more decentralized and self-sufficient communities.
  • Reduced Environmental Impact: Sustainable technologies will minimize human impact on the environment, fostering a healthier planet.
  • Enhanced Quality of Life: Access to clean resources, healthy food, and a thriving environment will improve the quality of life for all.
  • New Economic Models: Circular economies and sustainable industries will create new economic opportunities and redefine traditional economic models.

5. Challenges and Considerations:

Achieving this vision of sustainable technology in 3150 will require overcoming significant challenges:

  • Technological Barriers: Developing the necessary technologies will require significant research and innovation.
  • Ethical Dilemmas: Powerful technologies raise ethical questions about their use and impact on society. Careful consideration and regulation will be essential.
  • Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require international cooperation and collaboration.

6. Conclusion:

Sustainable technology in 3150 represents a vision of a future where humanity lives in harmony with the planet. While the specific technologies described here are speculative, the underlying principles of resource efficiency, adaptability, and ethical development are crucial for creating a sustainable future. By prioritizing these principles today, we can pave the way for a more resilient and equitable world for generations to come.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3150 ?

You’re thinking big picture! It’s exciting to imagine how sustainable technology could revolutionize industry in 3150. Here are some potential applications, keeping in mind the core principles of resource efficiency, adaptability, and minimal environmental impact:

1. Manufacturing and Production:

  • On-Demand Fabrication: Imagine factories that can create anything from consumer goods to industrial parts using advanced 3D printing and matter reconfiguration technologies. Raw materials would be sourced sustainably and transformed with minimal waste.
  • Closed-Loop Production: Industries would operate on closed-loop systems, where waste is not just minimized but eliminated. Every byproduct would be a resource for another process, creating a circular economy within and between industries.  
  • Localized Production: Manufacturing could become highly localized, reducing the need for long and resource-intensive supply chains. Cities or even communities might have their own fabrication facilities, producing goods tailored to their needs.

2. Resource Extraction and Processing:

  • Sustainable Mining: Mining operations, if still necessary, would be conducted with minimal environmental impact. Advanced robotics and AI could be used to extract resources with precision, minimizing waste and damage to ecosystems.  
  • Resource Regeneration: Technologies might exist to extract valuable materials from waste streams or even regenerate resources from abundant elements like seawater or common minerals.
  • Asteroid Mining: If humanity has expanded into space, asteroid mining could provide access to resources. Sustainable technology would be crucial for extracting and transporting these resources back to Earth or other settlements.  

3. Energy Production and Distribution:

  • Decentralized Energy Grids: Industries would rely on localized, renewable energy sources, such as fusion power, space-based solar, or advanced geothermal. Smart grids would manage energy distribution, optimizing efficiency and minimizing waste.  
  • Energy Storage: Highly efficient energy storage solutions would be integrated into industrial processes, allowing for continuous operation even when renewable energy sources fluctuate.
  • Process Optimization: AI and advanced sensors would monitor and optimize industrial processes in real-time, minimizing energy consumption and maximizing efficiency.  

4. Transportation and Logistics:

  • Sustainable Transportation: Industries would rely on sustainable transportation systems, such as electric vehicles powered by renewable energy, or even more advanced technologies like maglev trains or hypersonic transport.
  • Automated Logistics: AI-powered systems would manage logistics, optimizing routes, minimizing fuel consumption, and ensuring the efficient delivery of goods.  

5. Agriculture and Food Production:

  • Vertical Farming and Aquaculture: Industries would utilize advanced vertical farming and aquaculture systems to produce food sustainably in urban areas or even in harsh environments.
  • Precision Agriculture: AI and sensors would be used to optimize agricultural practices, minimizing water and fertilizer use, and maximizing yields.  
  • Lab-Grown Food: Technologies for producing lab-grown meat and other food products could provide sustainable and efficient protein sources.  

Key Considerations:

  • Automation and AI: Many of these industrial applications would rely heavily on automation and AI, raising questions about labor and employment.
  • Ethical Development: It’s crucial that these technologies are developed and implemented ethically, ensuring that they benefit all of humanity and do not exacerbate existing inequalities.
  • Resilience: Industrial systems would need to be resilient against disruptions, from extreme weather events to resource scarcity.  

By focusing on sustainability, efficiency, and ethical considerations, industries in 3150 could operate in a way that not only meets human needs but also protects the planet and ensures a thriving future for generations to come.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3150 ?

You’re right to focus on research and development! That’s the engine that will drive the sustainable technologies of 3150. Here’s a glimpse into what R&D might look like in the coming centuries:

1. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

  • Convergence of Fields: The challenges of sustainability are complex and interconnected. R&D will require experts from diverse fields – material science, biology, engineering, computer science, social sciences, and even the arts – to work together, sharing knowledge and perspectives.  
  • Global Networks: Collaboration will extend beyond national borders. International research teams, open-source platforms, and knowledge-sharing networks will accelerate the pace of innovation.

2. Focus Areas:

  • Advanced Materials:
    • Bio-inspired Materials: Studying natural materials like spider silk or seashells to design new materials with exceptional properties (strength, flexibility, self-healing).  
    • Nanotechnology: Manipulating matter at the atomic level to create materials with unique functionalities (superconductivity, light manipulation, adaptive properties).  
    • Sustainable Material Synthesis: Developing methods to create materials from abundant and renewable resources, minimizing reliance on scarce elements.
  • Energy:
    • Fusion Energy: Continuing research into fusion power, aiming to achieve a safe, efficient, and commercially viable fusion reactor.  
    • Space-Based Solar: Exploring the feasibility of harvesting solar energy in space and transmitting it to Earth.
    • Advanced Energy Storage: Developing more efficient and compact energy storage solutions to balance fluctuating renewable energy sources.  
  • Biotechnology:
    • Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems to create new materials, fuels, and even technologies that can help restore damaged ecosystems.  
    • Precision Agriculture: Using biotechnology to develop crops that are more resilient to climate change, require less water and fertilizer, and have higher nutritional value.  
  • Artificial Intelligence:
    • AI for Optimization: Developing AI systems that can optimize resource use in complex systems, from energy grids to transportation networks.
    • AI for Design: Using AI to assist in the design of new sustainable technologies, exploring a vast range of possibilities and identifying optimal solutions.
  • Environmental Science:
    • Ecosystem Restoration: Researching methods to restore damaged ecosystems, reintroduce endangered species, and enhance biodiversity.
    • Climate Change Mitigation: Investigating technologies for removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and mitigating the effects of climate change.

3. Research Methods:

  • Simulation and Modeling: Advanced computer simulations will allow researchers to model complex systems and test new technologies before they are built.
  • Rapid Prototyping: 3D printing and other rapid prototyping techniques will enable researchers to quickly create and test new designs.  
  • Citizen Science: Engaging the public in research through citizen science initiatives, crowdsourcing data and ideas.  

4. Ethical Considerations:

  • Responsible Innovation: Research will need to be guided by ethical principles, ensuring that new technologies are developed and used in a way that benefits humanity and protects the planet.
  • Risk Assessment: Thoroughly assessing the potential risks of new technologies, both intended and unintended.
  • Transparency and Openness: Sharing research findings openly and transparently to foster collaboration and accelerate progress.

5. Long-Term Vision:

  • Generational Research: Recognizing that some research areas, like fusion energy, may take centuries to fully realize.
  • Investing in the Future: Committing to long-term funding for research and development, recognizing that the sustainable technologies of 3150 will depend on the investments we make today.

By fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, focusing on key areas, utilizing advanced research methods, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can lay the foundation for a future where sustainable technology is not just a dream, but a reality.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »