Sustainable Technology of 3130

Sustainable Technology of 3130 ?

The term “Sustainable Technology of 3130” is quite broad and could refer to various fields. To give you the most relevant information, I need some context.

However, based on my knowledge, here are some potential interpretations and examples of sustainable technologies that might exist in the year 3130:

Possible Interpretations and Examples:

• Advanced Energy Solutions:
  • Fusion Power: By 3130, fusion energy might be a widely adopted technology, providing clean and abundant power.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Large solar arrays in space could collect sunlight and beam it down to Earth, providing a continuous source of renewable energy.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions might be available, allowing for seamless integration of renewable energy sources.
• Environmental Remediation and Conservation:
  • Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Technologies to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere could be highly advanced, helping to combat climate change.  
  • Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Advanced robotics and biotechnology could be used to clean up pollution and restore marine ecosystems.
  • Biodiversity Preservation: Technologies for monitoring and protecting endangered species and habitats could be highly sophisticated.
• Sustainable Agriculture and Food Production:
  • Vertical Farming: Multi-story vertical farms could be common in urban areas, providing fresh produce with minimal land and water usage.
  • Lab-Grown Meat: Cultured meat technology could be perfected, reducing the environmental impact of traditional animal agriculture.
  • Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI could be used to optimize crop yields while minimizing resource inputs.  
• Sustainable Transportation:
  • Hyperloop Systems: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops could connect cities and regions, reducing travel time and energy consumption.  
  • Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Electric vehicles might be the norm, and autonomous driving technology could further improve efficiency and safety.
  • Personal Air Mobility: Flying cars or other personal air vehicles could be a common mode of transportation, reducing traffic congestion.
• Circular Economy and Waste Management:
  • Advanced Recycling Technologies: Highly efficient recycling processes could recover valuable materials from waste, minimizing the need for new resources.
  • Bioplastics and Biodegradable Materials: The use of sustainable and biodegradable materials could be widespread, reducing plastic pollution.
  • Waste-to-Energy Technologies: Advanced technologies could convert waste into usable energy, further reducing landfill waste.  

Important Considerations:

• Technological Advancements: It’s important to remember that technology is constantly evolving. What seems like science fiction today could be a reality in 3130.
• Sustainability Challenges: Even with advanced technology, sustainability challenges will likely persist. Issues like resource depletion, pollution, and climate change will need ongoing solutions.
• Ethical Considerations: As technology advances, ethical considerations become increasingly important. Ensuring that technology is used responsibly and for the benefit of all will be crucial.

In Conclusion:

The sustainable technologies of 3130 are likely to be highly advanced and integrated into various aspects of life. They will need to address the ongoing challenges of sustainability and ensure a healthy planet for future generations.

If you can provide more context about the specific area of interest, I can give you more targeted information about sustainable technologies in 3130.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3130 ?

It seems you’re interested in what sustainable technology might look like in the distant future! That’s a fascinating question. While we can’t predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and advancements.

Here’s a breakdown of potential sustainable technologies in 3130, keeping in mind that this is imaginative speculation:

1. Energy:

• Fusion Power Dominance: By 3130, fusion energy might be a primary source of power, providing clean and abundant energy for all.
• Space-Based Solar: Massive solar arrays in space could collect sunlight and beam it to Earth, ensuring a constant supply of renewable energy.  
• Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions would be commonplace, seamlessly integrating various renewable sources.

2. Environment:

• Atmospheric Regeneration: Advanced technologies could actively remove greenhouse gases and pollutants from the atmosphere, reversing climate change effects.
• Ocean Restoration: Robotic systems and biotechnology could be used to clean up pollution, restore coral reefs, and revitalize marine ecosystems.
• Biodiversity Preservation: Sophisticated monitoring and protection systems could safeguard endangered species and their habitats, ensuring a thriving biosphere.

3. Food & Agriculture:

• Vertical Farming: Multi-level vertical farms in urban centers could produce fresh, local food with minimal land and water use.  
• Cultured Meat Perfection: Lab-grown meat could be indistinguishable from traditional meat, significantly reducing the environmental impact of animal agriculture.  
• Precision Agriculture: AI and sensors could optimize crop yields while minimizing resource inputs like water and fertilizers.

4. Transportation:

• Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems could connect cities and regions, revolutionizing travel and reducing energy consumption.  
• Electric & Autonomous: Electric vehicles might be the norm, with autonomous driving further improving efficiency and safety.
• Personal Air Mobility: Flying cars or other personal air vehicles could be common, easing traffic congestion and enabling faster commutes.

5. Resource Management:

• Circular Economy: Advanced recycling could recover almost all materials from waste, minimizing the need for new resource extraction.
• Bioplastics Everywhere: Biodegradable and sustainable bioplastics could replace traditional plastics, reducing pollution and dependence on fossil fuels.  
• Waste-to-Energy: Advanced systems could convert waste into usable energy, further minimizing landfill waste.

Important Notes:

• Continuous Evolution: Technology constantly evolves. What seems like science fiction today might be reality in 3130.
• Sustainability Challenges: Even with advanced tech, challenges like resource depletion and pollution might persist, requiring ongoing solutions.
• Ethical Considerations: Ensuring technology is used responsibly and for the benefit of all will be crucial as it advances.

While this is speculative, it’s exciting to imagine the possibilities! The sustainable technologies of 3130 will likely be highly advanced and integrated into every aspect of life, striving to ensure a healthy planet for future generations.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3130 ?

That’s a great question! It helps to think about who would benefit most from sustainable technology in 3130. Here’s a breakdown:

• Humanity as a whole: This is the most obvious answer. Sustainable technology is about ensuring a healthy planet and a good quality of life for all people, both now and in the future. In 3130, humanity would rely on these technologies to:
  • Have access to clean energy and resources: To power their homes, industries, and transportation.
  • Live in a healthy environment: With clean air, water, and thriving ecosystems.
  • Have enough food: Produced sustainably and efficiently.
  • Be protected from the worst effects of climate change: Through advanced adaptation and mitigation technologies.
• Future generations: Sustainable technology is about more than just meeting our current needs. It’s about ensuring that future generations have the resources and a healthy environment they need to thrive.  
• The environment itself: Sustainable technology should aim to minimize human impact on the natural world and help to restore damaged ecosystems. This includes:
  • Protecting biodiversity: By preserving habitats and preventing extinctions.
  • Reducing pollution: In the air, water, and soil.  
  • Mitigating climate change: By reducing greenhouse gas emissions and developing carbon capture technologies.  
• Specific industries: Many industries would rely on sustainable technology to operate in an environmentally responsible way. This could include:
  • Agriculture: For sustainable food production.
  • Manufacturing: For resource-efficient and pollution-free processes.
  • Transportation: For clean and efficient mobility.
  • Energy: For providing clean and renewable power.
• Governments and policymakers: They would play a crucial role in promoting and regulating the development and use of sustainable technology. This includes:
  • Investing in research and development: To create new sustainable technologies.
  • Creating policies and incentives: To encourage the adoption of sustainable practices.
  • Working with international organizations: To address global sustainability challenges.  

In essence, sustainable technology in 3130 would be essential for the well-being of humanity, the health of the planet, and the functioning of a sustainable society. It would be something that everyone relies on and benefits from, even if they don’t realize it.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3130 ?

The need for sustainable technology isn’t something relegated to the future of 3130. It’s a critical requirement now, and its importance only escalates as time goes on. Thinking about 3130 helps us visualize the long-term consequences of our current actions and underscores the urgency of developing and implementing sustainable practices today.

Here’s a breakdown of when sustainable technology is required:

• Immediately (Now): We are already facing the consequences of unsustainable practices, including climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. Sustainable technologies are needed now to mitigate these effects and prevent further damage. This includes transitioning to renewable energy, improving energy efficiency, developing sustainable agriculture, and reducing waste.  
• In the near future (Next few decades): As the global population grows and consumption patterns increase, the pressure on resources and the environment will intensify. Sustainable technologies are crucial in the near future to meet the growing demand for energy, food, and other resources without further damaging the planet.  
• In the long term (Including 3130): Sustainable technology is essential for ensuring the long-term survival and well-being of humanity and the planet. By 3130, if we haven’t made significant progress in developing and implementing sustainable practices, the consequences could be catastrophic. Thinking about such a distant future helps us understand the long-term implications of our choices today.
• Continuously: Sustainability is not a destination but a journey. Even if we achieve a sustainable state at some point, we will need to continue innovating and adapting to maintain it. New challenges will likely arise, and we will need to develop new sustainable technologies to address them.

In short, the need for sustainable technology is not something that will suddenly appear in 3130. It’s a need that exists now and will continue to exist in the future. The longer we wait to act, the more difficult and costly it will be to address the challenges we face. Therefore, it’s crucial to prioritize the development and implementation of sustainable technologies today to ensure a healthy planet and a prosperous future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3130 ?

You’re right to think about the “where” of sustainable technology! It’s not just a matter of what it is and when we need it, but also where it needs to be applied. Here’s a look at the key areas where sustainable technology will be essential in 3130 (and, of course, much sooner):

1. Urban Centers:

• Smart Cities: Sustainable technology will be at the heart of smart city infrastructure, optimizing energy use, managing waste, and improving transportation.  
• Vertical Farms: Urban areas will likely have widespread vertical farms to produce food locally, reducing transportation needs and land use.  
• Sustainable Buildings: Buildings will be designed and built with sustainable materials and energy-efficient systems.

2. Rural Areas:

• Sustainable Agriculture: Precision agriculture and other technologies will help maximize food production while minimizing environmental impact.  
• Renewable Energy: Rural areas may be ideal for generating renewable energy, such as wind and solar power.  
• Ecosystem Restoration: Technologies will be needed to restore and protect natural ecosystems in rural areas.

3. Industrial Settings:

• Circular Economy: Industries will need to adopt circular economy principles, minimizing waste and maximizing resource recovery.  
• Clean Manufacturing: Sustainable technologies will be needed to reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing processes.
• Sustainable Resource Extraction: Even resource extraction will need to be done more sustainably, with minimal impact on the environment.

4. Transportation Networks:

• Hyperloop Systems: Hyperloop networks will likely connect cities and regions, reducing travel time and energy consumption.
• Electric Vehicle Infrastructure: Widespread charging infrastructure will be needed to support electric vehicles.  
• Sustainable Aviation and Shipping: Technologies will be needed to make air and sea travel more sustainable.

5. Homes and Communities:

• Smart Homes: Homes will be equipped with smart technologies to optimize energy use and manage resources efficiently.
• Renewable Energy Integration: Homes will likely generate their own renewable energy, such as solar power.
• Sustainable Consumption: Technologies and systems will be needed to encourage sustainable consumption patterns at the individual and community level.

6. Global Scale:

• Climate Change Mitigation: Technologies will be needed to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and mitigate the effects of climate change.
• Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Global efforts will be needed to clean up pollution and restore marine ecosystems.
• Biodiversity Preservation: International cooperation and technologies will be essential to protect biodiversity on a global scale.

Important Note:

It’s crucial to remember that sustainable technology needs to be implemented everywhere, not just in specific locations. It needs to be integrated into all aspects of society, from the way we produce and consume goods to the way we travel and live our daily lives.

By thinking about the “where” of sustainable technology, we can better understand the scope of the challenge and the importance of developing and implementing sustainable solutions in all areas of our lives.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3130 ?

You’re hitting on a crucial point! It’s not enough to just have sustainable technology in 3130; we need to understand how it will be implemented and integrated into society. Here’s a look at the “how” of sustainable technology in 3130:

1. Systems Thinking:

• Interconnectedness: Sustainable technology will need to be implemented with a systems-thinking approach, recognizing the interconnectedness of different systems (energy, food, transportation, etc.). Solutions in one area should complement and support solutions in others.
• Holistic Approach: A holistic approach will be needed, considering the environmental, social, and economic impacts of technology.

2. Integration and Infrastructure:

• Smart Grids: Advanced smart grids will be essential for managing and distributing renewable energy efficiently.  
• Circular Infrastructure: Infrastructure will need to be designed to support a circular economy, with closed-loop systems for resource use and waste management.  
• Digital Integration: Sustainable technology will be integrated with digital technologies, such as AI and the Internet of Things, to optimize resource use and improve efficiency.

3. Policy and Governance:

• Supportive Policies: Governments will need to implement policies that incentivize the development and adoption of sustainable technology.  
• Regulations and Standards: Regulations and standards will be needed to ensure that technology is used in an environmentally and socially responsible way.
• International Cooperation: International cooperation will be essential to address global sustainability challenges.

4. Social and Behavioral Changes:

• Sustainable Lifestyles: Individuals and communities will need to adopt more sustainable lifestyles, reducing consumption and making more environmentally conscious choices.  
• Education and Awareness: Education and awareness campaigns will be needed to promote sustainable practices and encourage the adoption of sustainable technology.  
• Community Engagement: Engaging communities in the design and implementation of sustainable technology will be crucial for ensuring its success.

5. Innovation and Adaptation:

• Continuous Innovation: Continuous innovation will be needed to develop new and improved sustainable technologies.
• Adaptation and Resilience: Technologies will need to be adaptable and resilient to the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges.
• Research and Development: Ongoing research and development will be essential for advancing sustainable technology.

In essence, the “how” of sustainable technology in 3130 will involve a combination of technological advancements, policy and governance frameworks, social and behavioral changes, and a commitment to continuous innovation and adaptation.

It’s about creating a system where technology works in harmony with nature and society to ensure a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3130 ?

It’s tricky to do a traditional “case study” on sustainable technology in 3130 because it’s so far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and project what might be possible. Here’s an attempt:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Ganges River Basin in 3130

Background:

In the early 21st century, the Ganges River Basin in India faced severe environmental challenges. Pollution from industrial waste, agricultural runoff, and untreated sewage threatened the health of the river and the millions of people who depended on it. Climate change exacerbated the problem, leading to more frequent droughts and floods.  

The Challenge:

By 3130, the population in the region had grown significantly, putting even more pressure on the river’s resources. Traditional methods of water management and waste treatment were no longer sufficient. A radical shift towards sustainable technology was needed to revitalize the Ganges and ensure its long-term health.

The Solution:

A multi-faceted approach was adopted, integrating various sustainable technologies:

• Advanced Water Purification: Nanotechnology-based filtration systems were deployed to remove pollutants from industrial and agricultural runoff before it reached the river.
• Decentralized Sewage Treatment: Smart, self-contained sewage treatment plants were installed in communities throughout the basin, eliminating the need for large, centralized systems.
• Precision Agriculture: Farmers adopted precision agriculture techniques, using sensors and AI to optimize irrigation and fertilizer use, reducing water consumption and pollution.
• Ecosystem Restoration: Robotic systems and biotechnology were used to restore degraded wetlands and riparian zones, helping to filter water and provide habitat for wildlife.
• Renewable Energy Integration: Solar and wind power plants were built throughout the basin, providing clean energy for homes, industries, and agriculture.

Results:

By 3130, the Ganges River Basin had been transformed:

• Water Quality Improved: The water in the Ganges was once again safe for drinking and bathing.
• Ecosystems Revitalized: Wetlands and forests thrived, supporting a rich diversity of plant and animal life.
• Agricultural Productivity Increased: Sustainable farming practices led to higher crop yields and improved food security.
• Community Well-being Enhanced: People had access to clean water, sanitation, and reliable energy, leading to improved health and quality of life.

Lessons Learned:

This hypothetical case study demonstrates the potential of sustainable technology to address complex environmental challenges. It highlights the importance of:

• Integrated Solutions: Combining various technologies to create synergistic effects.
• Long-Term Vision: Planning for the long-term health of the environment and future generations.
• Community Engagement: Involving local communities in the design and implementation of solutions.
• Continuous Innovation: Adapting and improving technologies to meet evolving challenges.

Conclusion:

While this is a fictional scenario, it provides a glimpse into what might be possible with sustainable technology in 3130. By learning from this hypothetical case study and investing in sustainable solutions today, we can work towards a future where technology helps us create a healthy and prosperous planet for all.

COURTESY : Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3130 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3130: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3130, extrapolating from current trends and envisioning the advancements necessary to address long-term global challenges. It examines key areas like energy, environment, food, transportation, and resource management, highlighting the interconnectedness of these domains and the importance of a holistic approach to sustainability. This paper aims to stimulate discussion and inspire innovation towards a future where technology empowers a thriving planet and a prosperous human civilization.

1. Introduction:

The concept of sustainability has evolved from a concern about resource depletion to a comprehensive framework for ensuring the well-being of both humanity and the planet. By 3130, sustainable technology will be integral to every facet of human life, addressing the long-term consequences of climate change, population growth, and resource scarcity. This paper envisions a future where technology not only mitigates these challenges but also actively contributes to the restoration and enhancement of Earth’s ecosystems.

2. Energy:

The energy landscape of 3130 will likely be dominated by:

• Fusion Power: Controlled nuclear fusion, a clean and virtually limitless energy source, may have become a widespread reality, powering cities and industries with minimal environmental impact.
• Space-Based Solar: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit could capture abundant sunlight and beam it to Earth, providing a continuous and reliable source of renewable energy.
• Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions will be essential for balancing supply and demand from intermittent renewable sources.

3. Environment:

• Atmospheric Regeneration: Advanced technologies could actively remove greenhouse gases and other pollutants from the atmosphere, reversing the effects of climate change.
• Ocean Restoration: Robotic systems and biotechnology could be employed to clean up pollution, restore coral reefs, and revitalize marine ecosystems.
• Biodiversity Preservation: Sophisticated monitoring and protection systems could safeguard endangered species and their habitats, ensuring a thriving biosphere.

4. Food and Agriculture:

• Vertical Farming: Multi-level vertical farms in urban centers could produce fresh, local food with minimal land and water use.
• Cultured Meat: Lab-grown meat could become indistinguishable from traditional meat, significantly reducing the environmental impact of animal agriculture.
• Precision Agriculture: AI and sensors could optimize crop yields while minimizing resource inputs like water and fertilizers.

5. Transportation:

• Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems could connect cities and regions, revolutionizing travel and reducing energy consumption.
• Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Electric vehicles will likely be the norm, with autonomous driving further improving efficiency and safety.
• Personal Air Mobility: Flying cars or other personal air vehicles could be common, easing traffic congestion and enabling faster commutes.

6. Resource Management:

• Circular Economy: Advanced recycling technologies could recover nearly all materials from waste, minimizing the need for new resource extraction.
• Bioplastics and Biodegradable Materials: Sustainable bioplastics could replace traditional plastics, reducing pollution and dependence on fossil fuels.
• Waste-to-Energy: Advanced systems could convert waste into usable energy, further minimizing landfill waste.

7. Interconnectedness and Systems Thinking:

The sustainable technologies of 3130 will be interconnected and integrated through sophisticated networks and systems. Smart grids will manage energy distribution, and circular economy principles will be embedded in industrial processes. A holistic, systems-thinking approach will be crucial for maximizing efficiency and minimizing environmental impact.

8. Social and Ethical Considerations:

As technology advances, ethical considerations become increasingly important. Ensuring equitable access to resources, protecting privacy, and addressing potential job displacement due to automation will be crucial. Societal values and ethical frameworks must guide the development and deployment of sustainable technology.

9. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 3130 presented in this white paper is ambitious but achievable. It requires sustained investment in research and development, supportive policies, and a global commitment to sustainability. By embracing innovation and adopting a holistic perspective, we can create a future where technology empowers a thriving planet and a prosperous human civilization.

10. Call to Action:

This white paper serves as a call to action for researchers, policymakers, industry leaders, and individuals to collaborate and accelerate the development and implementation of sustainable technologies. By working together, we can create a future where the promise of sustainable technology is realized for the benefit of all.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3130 ?

You’re asking a great question that gets at the heart of how sustainable technology will truly transform industries in the future! Here are some potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3130, building on the trends we see today:

1. Manufacturing:

• Circular Production: Factories will operate on circular economy principles, with closed-loop systems for resource use. Almost all materials will be recycled or reused, minimizing waste and the need for raw material extraction.
• Zero-Emission Processes: Manufacturing processes will be powered by renewable energy sources like fusion or space-based solar. Factories will be designed to minimize their environmental footprint, with near-zero emissions of pollutants.
• Advanced Materials: Industries will utilize advanced materials with sustainable origins and exceptional properties. This might include bio-based composites, high-performance recycled materials, and nanomaterials engineered for sustainability.  

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

• Fusion Power Plants: Fusion reactors will become a standard source of clean and abundant energy, powering industries and communities.
• Space-Based Solar Farms: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit will capture sunlight and beam it to Earth, providing a continuous source of renewable energy for industrial use.  
• Smart Grids: Sophisticated smart grids will manage energy distribution, optimizing energy use in real-time and ensuring grid stability.  

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

• Sustainable Mining: Even resource extraction (which will ideally be greatly reduced) will be more sustainable. Mining operations will use less water and energy, and they will have minimal impact on the surrounding environment.
• Advanced Recycling: Highly efficient recycling facilities will recover valuable materials from waste streams, providing a source of secondary resources for manufacturing.
• Biorefineries: Biorefineries will process renewable biomass to produce fuels, chemicals, and other valuable products, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

4. Construction and Infrastructure:

• Sustainable Building Materials: Buildings and infrastructure will be constructed with sustainable materials like bioplastics, recycled materials, and carbon-neutral cement.
• Modular Construction: Modular construction techniques will be used to reduce waste and improve efficiency in building projects.  
• Self-Healing Infrastructure: Infrastructure systems will be designed with self-healing capabilities, reducing maintenance needs and extending their lifespan.

5. Agriculture and Food Production:

• Vertical Farms: Large-scale vertical farms will be common in urban areas, producing fresh, local food for communities and reducing the need for long-distance transportation.
• Automated Agriculture: Robots and AI will be used to automate many agricultural tasks, increasing efficiency and reducing labor needs.
• Sustainable Aquaculture: Fish farming will be done in a sustainable way, minimizing environmental impact and ensuring the health of aquatic ecosystems.

6. Transportation and Logistics:

• Hyperloop Networks: Hyperloop systems will connect industrial centers, facilitating the fast and efficient transport of goods.  
• Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Electric vehicles will dominate transportation, with autonomous driving further improving efficiency and safety.
• Sustainable Aviation and Shipping: Technologies will be developed to make air and sea travel more sustainable, reducing emissions and environmental impact.

7. Information and Communication Technologies:

• Green Data Centers: Data centers will be powered by renewable energy and designed to minimize their environmental footprint.
• Sustainable Electronics: Electronic devices will be made with sustainable materials and designed for easy recycling and reuse.
• Virtual Collaboration: Advanced virtual collaboration tools will reduce the need for travel and physical meetings, further reducing environmental impact.  

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could be applied in industries in 3130. The key will be to integrate these technologies seamlessly and adopt a systems-thinking approach to ensure that industries operate in a way that is both economically viable and environmentally responsible.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3130 ?

You’re asking about the process that will get us to sustainable technology in 3130! That’s a very important question. Here’s how research and development (R&D) will likely play a role:

1. Fundamental Scientific Research:

• Materials Science: Continued research into new materials with sustainable origins and exceptional properties will be crucial. This could include bio-based composites, advanced recycled materials, and nanomaterials engineered for sustainability.
• Energy Technologies: Fundamental research into fusion energy, advanced solar capture, and novel energy storage solutions will be essential for developing clean and abundant energy sources.
• Environmental Science: Research into climate change mitigation, ecosystem restoration, and pollution remediation will be critical for protecting the planet.

2. Applied Research and Development:

• Technology Development: Building on fundamental research, applied R&D will focus on developing specific sustainable technologies, such as advanced water purification systems, carbon capture technologies, and sustainable agriculture techniques.
• Systems Integration: R&D will also be needed to integrate different sustainable technologies into larger systems, such as smart grids, circular economy infrastructure, and sustainable transportation networks.
• Optimization and Efficiency: Research will focus on optimizing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of sustainable technologies, making them more accessible and widely adopted.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

• Cross-Disciplinary Teams: R&D in sustainable technology will require collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and other experts from various fields. ¹   1. The Significance and Impact of R&D (Research and Development) in Sustainability – Aithor aithor.com
• Knowledge Sharing: Open access to research findings and data will be essential for accelerating innovation and avoiding duplication of effort.
• Global Partnerships: International collaboration will be crucial for addressing global sustainability challenges and sharing knowledge and resources.

4. Long-Term Vision and Funding:

• Sustained Investment: Consistent and long-term funding will be needed to support R&D in sustainable technology, recognizing that many of these technologies may take decades to develop.
• Strategic Planning: Governments and research institutions will need to develop strategic plans for R&D in sustainable technology, prioritizing key areas and coordinating efforts.
• Incentivizing Innovation: Policies and incentives will be needed to encourage private sector investment in sustainable technology R&D.

5. Iterative Process and Adaptation:

• Continuous Improvement: R&D in sustainable technology will be an iterative process, with continuous improvement and adaptation based on new findings and challenges.
• Adaptive Management: Technologies will need to be designed to be adaptable and resilient to the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges.
• Monitoring and Evaluation: Rigorous monitoring and evaluation will be essential to track progress and identify areas for improvement.

In essence, R&D in sustainable technology for 3130 will be a long-term, collaborative, and iterative process, requiring sustained investment, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a commitment to continuous improvement.

It’s about building a foundation of knowledge and innovation that will enable future generations to develop and implement the sustainable solutions they need to thrive.

COURTESY : Carnegie India

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.