Sustainable Technology of 3100

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3100 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses about sustainable technology in 3100 based on current trends and potential advancements:

Energy:

Fusion Power: Nuclear fusion, a clean and virtually limitless energy source, could become a reality, powering cities and industries with minimal environmental impact.
Advanced Solar: Solar technology might reach incredible efficiency levels, with space-based solar farms beaming energy to Earth or even directly powering space colonies.
Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions could solve the intermittency problem of renewable energy sources, ensuring a stable power supply.

Environment:

Carbon Capture and Utilization: Advanced technologies could capture and convert carbon dioxide from the atmosphere into useful products, effectively reversing climate change.
Ocean Cleanup: Autonomous systems could efficiently remove plastic and other pollutants from the oceans, restoring marine ecosystems.
Vertical Farming: High-tech vertical farms in urban areas could produce food locally, reducing transportation needs and land use.

Materials:

Biomaterials: Sustainable and biodegradable materials derived from plants or other biological sources could replace plastics and other polluting materials.
Self-Healing Materials: Materials that can repair themselves could extend the lifespan of products and reduce waste.
Recycling Technologies: Highly efficient recycling processes could recover valuable resources from waste, creating a circular economy.

Transportation:

Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Electric vehicles powered by clean energy sources could dominate transportation, reducing pollution and traffic congestion.
Hyperloop and Maglev Trains: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops or maglev trains could connect cities and regions, reducing travel time and emissions.
Personal Air Mobility: Flying cars or personal drones could become a common mode of transportation, revolutionizing urban mobility.

Other Areas:

Artificial Intelligence: AI could play a crucial role in optimizing energy use, managing resources, and developing sustainable solutions.
Biotechnology: Advances in biotechnology could lead to the development of sustainable agriculture practices, disease-resistant crops, and even the production of biofuels.
Nanotechnology: Nanomaterials could be used to create more efficient solar cells, water filters, and other sustainable technologies.

It’s important to remember that these are just possibilities. The actual sustainable technologies of 3100 could be very different. However, by continuing to invest in research and development, we can increase the chances of creating a sustainable future for all.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3100 ?

It’s exciting to think about the sustainable technologies of 3100! While we can’t predict the future with absolute certainty, here are some ideas based on current trends and potential breakthroughs:

Energy:

Fusion Power: Imagine a world powered by clean, virtually limitless energy from nuclear fusion. This could be a reality by 3100, providing abundant power for cities and industries with minimal environmental impact.
Space-Based Solar: Gigantic solar farms orbiting Earth could capture sunlight without atmospheric interference and beam energy down to the planet, providing a constant and reliable power source.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions could solve the intermittency problem of renewable energy sources like solar and wind, ensuring a stable power supply even when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing.

Environment:

Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Advanced technologies could capture and convert carbon dioxide from the atmosphere into useful products, effectively reversing climate change and restoring the Earth’s atmosphere.
Ocean Cleanup: Autonomous systems could efficiently remove plastic and other pollutants from the oceans, restoring marine ecosystems and protecting aquatic life.
Vertical Farming: High-tech vertical farms in urban areas could produce food locally, reducing transportation needs, land use, and the environmental impact of agriculture.

Materials:

Biomaterials: Sustainable and biodegradable materials derived from plants or other biological sources could replace plastics and other polluting materials, reducing waste and environmental damage.
Self-Healing Materials: Materials that can repair themselves could extend the lifespan of products and infrastructure, reducing waste and the need for frequent replacements.
Advanced Recycling: Highly efficient recycling processes could recover valuable resources from waste, creating a circular economy where resources are reused endlessly.

Transportation:

Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Electric vehicles powered by clean energy sources could dominate transportation, reducing pollution and traffic congestion in cities.
Hyperloop and Maglev Trains: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops or maglev trains could connect cities and regions, reducing travel time and emissions.
Personal Air Mobility: Flying cars or personal drones could become a common mode of transportation, revolutionizing urban mobility and reducing traffic on the ground.

Other Areas:

Artificial Intelligence: AI could play a crucial role in optimizing energy use, managing resources, and developing sustainable solutions for various challenges.
Biotechnology: Advances in biotechnology could lead to the development of sustainable agriculture practices, disease-resistant crops, and even the production of biofuels.
Nanotechnology: Nanomaterials could be used to create more efficient solar cells, water filters, and other sustainable technologies.

These are just a few possibilities, and the actual sustainable technologies of 3100 could be very different. However, by continuing to invest in research and development, we can increase the chances of creating a sustainable future for all.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3100 ?

Sustainable technology in 3100 will be essential for everyone on the planet! Here’s why:

Resource Scarcity: As populations grow and resources become more limited, sustainable technologies will be crucial for ensuring everyone has access to basic necessities like clean water, food, and energy.
Climate Change: The effects of climate change will likely be even more pronounced in 3100. Sustainable technologies will be necessary to mitigate these effects, such as by capturing carbon from the atmosphere and developing climate-resilient infrastructure.
Environmental Degradation: Pollution and habitat destruction could worsen over time. Sustainable technologies will be needed to clean up the environment, protect ecosystems, and prevent further damage.
Economic Development: Sustainable technologies can drive economic growth by creating new industries and jobs, while also reducing costs associated with resource depletion and environmental damage.
Social Equity: Sustainable technologies can help to address social inequalities by ensuring that everyone has access to the resources they need to thrive, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 3100 will be about creating a world where humanity can live in harmony with the planet, ensuring a good quality of life for all present and future generations.

This means that everyone will be stakeholders in sustainable technology, from individuals making conscious choices in their daily lives to governments and industries implementing large-scale solutions.

Here are some key groups that will be particularly reliant on and involved in the development and implementation of sustainable technology in 3100:

Individuals: We will all need to adopt sustainable practices in our homes, workplaces, and communities, such as conserving energy, reducing waste, and supporting sustainable businesses.
Governments: Governments will play a crucial role in setting policies and regulations that promote sustainability, investing in research and development, and providing incentives for sustainable practices.
Businesses: Businesses will need to adopt sustainable practices throughout their operations, from sourcing materials to manufacturing products to delivering services.
Scientists and Engineers: Researchers and innovators will be responsible for developing new sustainable technologies and improving existing ones.
Educators: Educators will need to teach future generations about sustainability and empower them to become responsible stewards of the planet.

Ultimately, creating a sustainable future will require a collective effort from all members of society. By working together, we can ensure that the sustainable technologies of 3100 benefit everyone and help to create a thriving planet for centuries to come.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3100 ?

Sustainable technology isn’t just something we’ll need in 3100; it’s something we need now and increasingly so in the years leading up to 3100. Here’s a breakdown of the timeline:

Now (2024 and beyond): We are already in a critical period where the need for sustainable technology is urgent. Climate change is happening, resources are depleting, and pollution is increasing. We need to be developing and implementing sustainable solutions today to mitigate these problems and prevent them from worsening.
Near Future (2050 and beyond): As the impacts of climate change and resource scarcity become more severe, the need for sustainable technology will become even more pressing. We will need to make significant progress in areas like renewable energy, carbon capture, and resource efficiency to avoid catastrophic consequences.
Distant Future (2100-3100): By the time we reach 3100, sustainable technology will likely be absolutely essential for human survival and well-being. We will need to have developed and implemented a wide range of solutions to ensure a healthy planet and a thriving society for future generations.

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology is not something that will suddenly appear in 3100. It’s a need that is growing more urgent with each passing year. The sooner we start investing in and implementing sustainable solutions, the better our chances of creating a positive future for ourselves and for generations to come.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about solving environmental problems. It’s also about creating a more equitable and just society, where everyone has access to the resources they need to thrive. This means that the development and implementation of sustainable technology must be guided by principles of social justice and environmental stewardship.

In conclusion, the need for sustainable technology is not something that can be postponed until some distant future. It’s a need that is with us now, and it will only become more urgent in the years to come. By working together to develop and implement sustainable solutions, we can create a better future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Trending Tech

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3100 ?

That’s a great question! Sustainable technology in 3100 will be needed everywhere, but here are some key areas where it will be especially crucial:

Urban Centers: Cities will likely be even more densely populated by 3100. Sustainable technologies will be needed to manage resources efficiently, reduce pollution, and create livable environments in these urban areas. This includes things like:
- Sustainable Buildings: Buildings that generate their own energy, use recycled materials, and minimize waste.
- Smart Infrastructure: Intelligent systems that optimize energy use, manage traffic flow, and provide essential services like water and sanitation.
- Urban Farming: Vertical farms and other innovative agricultural techniques to produce food locally and reduce reliance on transportation.
Rural Areas: Sustainable technologies will be needed to support agriculture, manage natural resources, and maintain healthy ecosystems in rural areas. This includes things like:
- Precision Agriculture: Technologies that use data and automation to optimize crop yields while minimizing environmental impact.
- Renewable Energy: Off-grid renewable energy systems to power remote communities and agricultural operations.
- Ecosystem Restoration: Technologies to restore degraded ecosystems and protect biodiversity.
Transportation Systems: Sustainable technologies will be needed to create efficient and low-emission transportation systems that connect people and goods across vast distances. This includes things like:
- Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Widespread use of electric vehicles powered by renewable energy sources, as well as self-driving vehicles to improve safety and efficiency.
- High-Speed Rail: Advanced high-speed rail networks to reduce travel time and emissions.
- Sustainable Aviation: Development of biofuels and other sustainable technologies to reduce the environmental impact of air travel.
Industrial Sectors: Sustainable technologies will be needed to transform industries and make them more environmentally friendly. This includes things like:
- Circular Economy: Implementing closed-loop systems where resources are reused and recycled to minimize waste.
- Green Manufacturing: Developing new manufacturing processes that use less energy and produce less pollution.
- Carbon Capture and Utilization: Technologies to capture carbon dioxide emissions from industrial processes and convert them into useful products.
Global Commons: Sustainable technologies will be needed to protect and manage the Earth’s shared resources, such as the oceans, atmosphere, and forests. This includes things like:
- Ocean Cleanup: Advanced systems to remove plastic and other pollutants from the oceans.
- Climate Engineering: Technologies to mitigate the effects of climate change, such as by reflecting sunlight back into space.
- Biodiversity Conservation: Technologies to monitor and protect endangered species and ecosystems.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about specific devices or systems. It’s also about creating a culture of sustainability, where people are aware of environmental issues and are empowered to make sustainable choices in their daily lives.

By developing and implementing sustainable technologies in all these areas, we can create a world in 3100 where humanity can thrive in harmony with the planet.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3100 ?

Sustainable technology in 3100 will be required in a multitude of ways to ensure a thriving and harmonious existence on our planet. Here’s a glimpse into how it might be needed:

1. Resource Management:

Circular Economy: To minimize waste and maximize resource utilization, advanced recycling technologies and closed-loop systems will be essential. This means that everything we produce and consume will be designed for reuse, repair, or repurposing, minimizing the need for virgin materials and reducing pollution.
Resource Optimization: AI-powered systems will monitor and manage resource consumption in real-time, optimizing energy use in homes, industries, and transportation systems. This could involve smart grids that distribute energy efficiently, or even personalized energy assistants that help individuals reduce their consumption.
Sustainable Materials: Biomaterials and self-healing materials will be widely used to create durable and environmentally friendly products and infrastructure. This could mean buildings made from renewable resources that can repair themselves, or packaging that is completely biodegradable.

2. Environmental Protection:

Climate Change Mitigation: Advanced carbon capture and utilization technologies will be crucial for removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and mitigating the effects of climate change. This could involve large-scale carbon capture facilities that store or convert CO2, or even technologies that enhance natural carbon sequestration processes.
Ecosystem Restoration: Technologies will be needed to restore damaged ecosystems and protect biodiversity. This could involve using drones to plant trees in deforested areas, or developing artificial reefs to revitalize marine ecosystems.
Pollution Control: Advanced filtration and purification systems will be essential for cleaning up pollution in the air, water, and soil. This could involve nanoscale filters that remove pollutants from water, or even self-cleaning surfaces that prevent the buildup of dirt and grime.

3. Food Production:

Sustainable Agriculture: Precision agriculture techniques and vertical farming will be used to produce food more efficiently and sustainably. This could involve using sensors to monitor crop health and optimize irrigation, or growing crops in controlled environments to reduce the need for pesticides and herbicides.
Alternative Food Sources: Technologies may be developed to produce alternative protein sources, such as cultured meat or insect-based foods, to reduce the environmental impact of traditional livestock farming.
Food Waste Reduction: Smart packaging and food preservation technologies will help to reduce food waste throughout the supply chain. This could involve using sensors to monitor the freshness of food, or developing edible coatings that extend the shelf life of fruits and vegetables.

4. Healthcare:

Personalized Medicine: Advanced diagnostics and personalized medicine will allow for more targeted and effective treatments. This could involve using AI to analyze an individual’s genetic information and develop a personalized treatment plan, or using nanotechnology to deliver drugs directly to cancer cells.
Disease Prevention: Technologies may be developed to prevent diseases before they occur, such as through gene editing or personalized vaccines.
Assistive Technologies: Advanced robotics and AI could be used to develop assistive technologies for the elderly and disabled, allowing them to live more independent lives.

5. Space Exploration:

Sustainable Space Travel: Technologies will be needed to make space travel more sustainable, such as by developing reusable rockets and in-space resource utilization.
Space-Based Solar Power: Space-based solar farms could be used to beam clean energy back to Earth, providing a sustainable source of power for future generations.
Planetary Protection: Technologies will be needed to protect other planets from contamination by Earth-based microbes, and to ensure that any resources we extract from space are done so sustainably.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology might be required in 3100. The specific technologies that are developed will depend on the challenges that we face in the coming centuries. However, it is clear that sustainable technology will play a crucial role in creating a future where humanity can thrive in harmony with the planet.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3100 ?

It’s tough to give a specific case study for sustainable technology in 3100, as it’s so far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and future possibilities. Here’s one example:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 3100

Background: By the early 22nd century, climate change and deforestation had severely impacted the Amazon rainforest. Biodiversity plummeted, rainfall decreased, and the region was at risk of desertification. Recognizing the Amazon’s vital role in global climate regulation and biodiversity, a global effort was launched to revitalize the rainforest.

Sustainable Technology Solutions:

Advanced Reforestation Techniques: Drones and AI-powered systems were used to plant billions of trees, selecting species that were resilient to changing climate conditions. Nanotechnology was employed to create soil amendments that improved water retention and nutrient availability, aiding in the rapid growth of new forests.
Climate Engineering: Geoengineering techniques, such as stratospheric aerosol injection, were used to reflect sunlight and cool the planet, mitigating the impacts of climate change on the Amazon. This was carefully monitored and controlled to minimize any potential side effects.
Biotechnology: Genetically modified trees were developed that were more resistant to drought, pests, and disease. These trees were strategically planted to enhance the resilience of the forest.
Sustainable Agriculture: Local communities were trained in sustainable agriculture practices, such as agroforestry and permaculture, to reduce deforestation for farming. Advanced sensors and AI were used to optimize crop yields while minimizing environmental impact.
Ecosystem Restoration: Technologies were developed to restore degraded ecosystems, such as wetlands and grasslands, within the Amazon basin. This helped to improve water cycles and support biodiversity.

Results:

By 3100, the Amazon rainforest had been largely restored to its former glory. Biodiversity rebounded, rainfall increased, and the region once again played a vital role in global climate regulation.
Local communities thrived, thanks to sustainable agriculture practices and ecotourism initiatives.
The revitalization of the Amazon served as a model for ecosystem restoration efforts around the world.

Key Takeaways:

This hypothetical case study demonstrates how a combination of advanced technologies and sustainable practices could be used to address complex environmental challenges in the future.
It highlights the importance of international cooperation and long-term planning in achieving sustainability goals.
It emphasizes the need for ongoing research and development in sustainable technologies to address future challenges.

While this is just one possible scenario, it illustrates the potential of sustainable technology to create a better future for all. By continuing to innovate and invest in sustainable solutions, we can increase the chances of achieving a world where humanity and nature can thrive together.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3100 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3100: A Vision for a Thriving Planet

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3100, a century removed from the challenges of the 21st century. It posits that by 3100, humanity will have made significant strides in addressing climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation through the development and implementation of advanced sustainable technologies. This paper examines potential advancements in key areas, including energy, environment, materials, transportation, food production, and healthcare, outlining a vision for a thriving and sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The 21st century presented humanity with unprecedented challenges, primarily stemming from unsustainable practices related to energy production, resource consumption, and environmental stewardship. This white paper assumes that through concerted global effort, innovation, and a paradigm shift towards sustainability, humanity will have navigated these challenges by 3100. The technologies described herein are extrapolations of current trends and potential breakthroughs, aiming to inspire and inform the ongoing pursuit of a sustainable future.

2. Energy:

By 3100, reliance on fossil fuels will be a distant memory. Energy production will likely be dominated by:

Fusion Power: Commercialized and optimized fusion reactors will provide clean, abundant, and safe energy.
Space-Based Solar: Large-scale orbital solar farms will capture solar energy unimpeded by atmospheric interference, beaming it wirelessly to Earth.
Advanced Geothermal: Enhanced geothermal systems will tap into the Earth’s heat with greater efficiency and accessibility.
Smart Grids: AI-powered smart grids will optimize energy distribution and consumption, minimizing waste.

3. Environment:

Restoring and protecting Earth’s ecosystems will be paramount:

Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Large-scale carbon capture and sequestration technologies will actively remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
Ocean Revitalization: Autonomous robotic systems will clean up pollution and restore marine ecosystems.
Precision Conservation: Advanced monitoring and AI will enable targeted conservation efforts, protecting biodiversity and preventing habitat loss.
Geoengineering: Carefully researched and controlled geoengineering techniques may be employed to manage climate systems, if necessary.

4. Materials:

Material science will focus on sustainability and circularity:

Biomaterials: Biodegradable and compostable materials derived from renewable biological resources will replace traditional plastics and other polluting materials.
Self-Healing Materials: Materials capable of self-repair will extend the lifespan of products and infrastructure, reducing waste and maintenance needs.
Advanced Recycling: Highly efficient recycling processes will recover valuable resources from waste streams, creating a closed-loop material economy.

5. Transportation:

Transportation will be clean, efficient, and interconnected:

Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Electric vehicles powered by renewable energy will dominate personal and public transportation. Autonomous driving systems will improve safety and traffic flow.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems will connect cities and regions, drastically reducing travel times.
Sustainable Aviation: Biofuels and electric propulsion will power air travel, minimizing its environmental impact.

6. Food Production:

Feeding a growing population sustainably will require innovative approaches:

Vertical Farming: High-tech vertical farms in urban areas will produce fresh, local food year-round, reducing transportation needs and land use.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems will optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use.
Cultured Meat and Alternative Proteins: Cultured meat and other alternative protein sources will reduce reliance on traditional livestock farming.

7. Healthcare:

Healthcare will be personalized, preventative, and accessible:

Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology will enable targeted drug delivery and advanced diagnostics.
AI-Powered Diagnostics: AI will analyze medical data to provide early and accurate diagnoses.
Regenerative Medicine: Advances in regenerative medicine will enable the repair and regeneration of damaged tissues and organs.

8. Conclusion:

The sustainable technologies envisioned for 3100 represent a future where humanity has learned to live in harmony with the planet. Through continuous innovation, global cooperation, and a commitment to sustainability, we can create a world where future generations inherit a thriving and healthy Earth. This vision is not merely aspirational; it is a roadmap for the choices we must make today to ensure a sustainable tomorrow.

9. Further Research:

Continued research and development in the areas outlined above are crucial for realizing this vision. Interdisciplinary collaboration between scientists, engineers, policymakers, and the public is essential for accelerating the transition to a sustainable future.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3100 ?

You’re thinking big picture, and that’s awesome! Here are some potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3100, imagining how far things could advance:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

Closed-Loop Systems: Factories operate on circular economy principles. Raw materials are sourced sustainably, products are designed for disassembly and reuse, and waste is virtually eliminated. Imagine a factory where every component is tracked and recycled, minimizing environmental impact.
Personalized Production: Advanced 3D printing and nanotechnology enable on-demand manufacturing of customized products with minimal waste. You could order a new appliance, and it’s built to your exact specifications using sustainable materials, right in your home.
AI-Optimized Processes: AI controls every aspect of manufacturing, from energy use to material flow, ensuring maximum efficiency and minimal environmental impact. Factories become self-regulating systems that constantly strive for improvement.

2. Energy & Resource Management:

Decentralized Energy Grids: Industries generate and share energy through smart, interconnected microgrids, maximizing the use of renewable sources and minimizing transmission losses. Imagine industrial parks powered entirely by on-site solar or geothermal plants.
Resource Extraction & Processing: Advanced robotics and AI enable sustainable resource extraction with minimal environmental disruption. Imagine mines that operate with precision, extracting only the necessary materials and leaving the surrounding ecosystem intact.
Waste-to-Energy: Innovative technologies convert waste into usable energy, powering industrial processes and reducing landfill burden. Waste becomes a valuable resource, fueling a circular economy.

3. Construction & Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Infrastructure: Buildings and infrastructure are constructed from self-healing materials that can repair damage automatically, extending lifespan and reducing maintenance needs. Imagine bridges that can fix cracks on their own or roads that never need resurfacing.
Modular Construction: Buildings are assembled from modular components that can be easily reconfigured or repurposed, minimizing waste and maximizing flexibility. Imagine cities that can adapt to changing needs by simply rearranging buildings.
Sustainable Materials: Construction relies heavily on biomaterials and recycled materials, reducing the environmental impact of building and infrastructure development. Imagine houses built from sustainably grown timber or recycled plastics.

4. Agriculture & Food Production:

Vertical Farms & Controlled Environments: Industries utilize vertical farms and controlled environments to produce food locally and sustainably, reducing transportation needs and land use. Imagine skyscrapers that house farms producing fresh produce for the city below.
Precision Agriculture: AI and robotics optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use, ensuring sustainable food production. Imagine fields where drones monitor crop health and deliver targeted treatments, reducing the need for widespread pesticide use.
Alternative Protein Production: Industries produce cultured meat and other alternative proteins, reducing reliance on traditional livestock farming and its environmental impact. Imagine factories that produce meat without the need to raise and slaughter animals.

5. Transportation & Logistics:

Autonomous Fleets: Industries utilize fleets of autonomous vehicles powered by clean energy sources, optimizing logistics and minimizing emissions. Imagine warehouses where goods are moved and delivered by self-driving vehicles, improving efficiency and reducing costs.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems connect industrial centers, enabling rapid and efficient transportation of goods and materials. Imagine factories connected by a network of tubes that can transport goods across the country in a matter of hours.
Sustainable Packaging: Industries utilize biodegradable and compostable packaging materials, reducing waste and environmental impact. Imagine products packaged in materials that can be thrown in the compost bin after use.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology might be applied in industries in 3100. The possibilities are vast, and the specific applications will depend on the challenges and opportunities that arise in the coming centuries. However, it is clear that sustainable technology will play a crucial role in creating a future where industries operate in a way that is both economically viable and environmentally responsible.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3100 ?

It’s fascinating to think about the research and development that would lead to sustainable technology in 3100! Here’s a breakdown of potential areas of focus:

1. Fundamental Sciences:

Advanced Physics: Exploring the fundamental laws of the universe to unlock new energy sources (like zero-point energy or manipulating gravity), understand the nature of time and space for potential applications in energy transfer or even advanced propulsion.
Quantum Computing: Developing powerful quantum computers to simulate complex systems, design new materials, and optimize energy grids with unprecedented precision.
Consciousness Studies: Investigating the nature of consciousness to potentially create more harmonious AI systems, understand the human-environment connection on a deeper level, and perhaps even develop technologies that enhance human cognitive abilities for problem-solving and innovation.

2. Materials Science & Nanotechnology:

Programmable Matter: Developing materials that can be manipulated at the atomic level to change their properties on demand, enabling on-demand manufacturing, self-healing structures, and adaptive technologies.
Extreme Materials: Creating materials with extraordinary properties, such as super-strength, superconductivity at room temperature, or perfect light absorption, for applications in construction, energy storage, and transportation.
Bio-Integrated Materials: Designing materials that can seamlessly integrate with living organisms, for use in regenerative medicine, enhanced agriculture, and even creating symbiotic relationships between technology and nature.

3. Energy & Environment:

Fusion Energy Mastery: Achieving stable and efficient nuclear fusion to provide clean and abundant energy for the planet. This would involve overcoming immense technical challenges related to plasma containment and energy extraction.
Space-Based Energy Systems: Developing large-scale space-based solar power stations and efficient methods for transmitting energy wirelessly to Earth. This would require advancements in space infrastructure, robotics, and energy transmission technologies.
Planetary Engineering: Researching and developing methods for safely and responsibly managing Earth’s climate systems, including carbon capture, solar radiation management, and ecosystem restoration. This would require a deep understanding of complex environmental interactions and ethical considerations.

4. Biotechnology & Agriculture:

Synthetic Biology: Designing and engineering new biological systems for applications in medicine, agriculture, and environmental remediation. This could involve creating microbes that can produce biofuels, clean up pollution, or even enhance human health.
Advanced Agriculture: Developing sustainable agriculture practices that can feed a growing population while minimizing environmental impact. This could involve creating crops that are more resilient to climate change, require less water and fertilizer, and are more nutritious.
Personalized Medicine: Developing advanced diagnostic tools and personalized treatments based on an individual’s genetic makeup and lifestyle. This could involve using nanotechnology to deliver drugs directly to diseased cells or using gene editing to correct genetic defects.

5. Artificial Intelligence & Robotics:

General AI: Developing artificial intelligence systems that can reason, learn, and problem-solve like humans, enabling breakthroughs in various fields and assisting in the development of sustainable solutions.
Advanced Robotics: Creating robots that can perform complex tasks in a variety of environments, from exploring the depths of the ocean to building and maintaining infrastructure in space.
Human-Computer Interfaces: Developing seamless interfaces between humans and computers, allowing for enhanced communication, collaboration, and control of technology.

6. Social Sciences & Ethics:

Sustainability Economics: Developing economic models that prioritize sustainability and social well-being over short-term profits.
Environmental Ethics: Establishing ethical guidelines for the use of technology and the management of the environment, ensuring that future generations inherit a healthy planet.
Global Governance: Creating systems of global governance that can effectively address environmental challenges and promote sustainable development.

These are just some of the potential areas of research and development that could lead to sustainable technology in 3100. The actual path of innovation will depend on the challenges and opportunities that arise in the coming centuries. However, by continuing to invest in research and development across a wide range of disciplines, we can increase the chances of creating a future where humanity and nature can thrive together.Sources and related content

COURTESY : RBC

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.