Sustainable Technology of 3090

84 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3090 ?

The sustainability of a graphics card like the RTX 3090 can be considered from a few angles:

Manufacturing:

Auto-Extreme Technology: Some manufacturers, like ASUS, use automated manufacturing processes that reduce the use of harsh chemicals and lower power consumption during production. This contributes to a smaller environmental footprint.

Usage:

Power Efficiency: The RTX 3090, while a high-performance card, is designed with NVIDIA’s Ampere architecture, which offers improved power efficiency compared to previous generations. This means it can deliver more performance per watt of energy consumed.
Longevity: The RTX 3090 is a high-end card that can remain relevant for gaming and other demanding tasks for several years. This can reduce the need for frequent upgrades, thus minimizing electronic waste.

Cooling:

Efficient Cooling Solutions: Many RTX 3090 models come with advanced cooling solutions, including custom fans, heatsinks, and even liquid cooling options. Efficient cooling can help the card operate at optimal temperatures, potentially prolonging its lifespan and maintaining performance.

Recycling:

Responsible Disposal: When the time comes to retire the RTX 3090, it’s important to dispose of it responsibly. Many manufacturers and retailers offer recycling programs for electronic devices, ensuring that valuable materials are recovered and hazardous waste is handled properly.

Overall, while the RTX 3090 is a powerful and power-hungry card, manufacturers are taking steps to improve sustainability through efficient manufacturing, improved power efficiency, and durable designs. As consumers, we can also contribute by using the card responsibly, ensuring proper cooling, and recycling it at the end of its life.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 3090 ?

While the RTX 3090 is a powerful and power-hungry graphics card, there are aspects of its technology that contribute to sustainability:

1. Improved Architecture:

Ampere Architecture: The RTX 3090 is based on NVIDIA’s Ampere architecture, which offers significant improvements in power efficiency compared to previous generations. This means it can deliver more performance per watt of energy consumed.

2. Efficient Cooling Solutions:

Advanced Cooling Designs: Many RTX 3090 models come with highly efficient cooling solutions, including custom fans, heatsinks, and even liquid cooling options. Effective cooling helps the card operate at optimal temperatures, potentially prolonging its lifespan and maintaining performance, reducing the need for early replacement.

3. Longevity and Performance:

High-End Performance: The RTX 3090 is a top-tier graphics card that can handle demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and AI workloads for several years. This extended usability reduces the frequency of upgrades, minimizing electronic waste.

4. Manufacturing Processes:

Automated Manufacturing: Some manufacturers, like ASUS, utilize automated manufacturing processes (e.g., Auto-Extreme Technology) that reduce the use of harsh chemicals and lower power consumption during production, contributing to a smaller environmental impact.

5. Recycling and Disposal:

Responsible Recycling: When the RTX 3090 reaches the end of its life, it’s crucial to dispose of it responsibly. Many manufacturers and retailers offer recycling programs for electronic devices, ensuring that valuable materials are recovered and hazardous waste is handled properly.

Important Considerations:

Power Consumption: Despite improvements in efficiency, the RTX 3090 still consumes a significant amount of power. Users should consider their energy consumption and potentially opt for more power-efficient options if sustainability is a primary concern.
Environmental Impact: The manufacturing of any electronic device, including the RTX 3090, involves the use of resources and can have an environmental impact. It’s essential to be mindful of this and consider the overall lifecycle of the product.

In conclusion, while the RTX 3090 is a high-performance graphics card, its sustainability aspects lie in its improved architecture, efficient cooling, longevity, and responsible manufacturing and recycling practices. As a consumer, you can further contribute to sustainability by using the card responsibly, ensuring proper cooling, and recycling it at the end of its life.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3090 ?

While everyone benefits from more sustainable technology in general, here are some groups who might find the sustainable aspects of the RTX 3090 particularly relevant:

Gamers and Content Creators with Long-Term Usage: Those who plan to use the RTX 3090 for several years will benefit from its longevity and efficient cooling, as this can reduce the need for frequent upgrades and replacements.
Environmentally Conscious Users: Individuals who are mindful of their environmental impact will appreciate the improved power efficiency of the Ampere architecture and the responsible manufacturing practices employed by some manufacturers.
Researchers and Professionals: Those who rely on the RTX 3090 for demanding tasks like AI research or 3D rendering may be concerned about energy consumption and the potential for electronic waste, making the sustainable aspects of the card more appealing.
Organizations with Sustainability Goals: Companies and institutions that have sustainability targets may consider the environmental impact of their hardware choices, making the RTX 3090’s efficiency and recyclability relevant factors in their decision-making.

It’s important to remember that while the RTX 3090 has some sustainable features, it’s still a high-performance, power-consuming device. For those with a strong focus on sustainability, exploring more power-efficient alternatives might be a better option.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3090 ?

The need for sustainable technology in graphics cards like the RTX 3090 is becoming increasingly important for several reasons:

1. Growing Energy Consumption:

As graphics cards become more powerful, their energy consumption increases. This contributes to higher electricity bills and a larger carbon footprint. Sustainable technology helps to mitigate this by improving energy efficiency and reducing power consumption.

2. Environmental Concerns:

The manufacturing of electronic devices, including graphics cards, involves the use of resources and can have a negative impact on the environment. Sustainable technology aims to minimize this impact by using eco-friendly materials, reducing waste, and promoting responsible recycling.

3. E-waste Generation:

The rapid advancement of technology leads to frequent upgrades and the generation of electronic waste (e-waste). Sustainable technology encourages longer product lifecycles and responsible disposal practices to reduce e-waste.

4. Resource Depletion:

The production of graphics cards relies on the use of precious metals and rare earth elements, some of which are finite resources. Sustainable technology promotes resource efficiency and the recovery of valuable materials through recycling.

5. Increasing Awareness:

Consumers and businesses are becoming more aware of the environmental impact of their technology choices. There is a growing demand for sustainable products, and manufacturers are responding by incorporating sustainable features into their designs.

In summary, the need for sustainable technology in graphics cards like the RTX 3090 arises from the increasing energy consumption, environmental concerns, e-waste generation, resource depletion, and growing awareness of sustainability among consumers and businesses.

By embracing sustainable technology, we can reduce the environmental footprint of graphics cards and contribute to a more sustainable future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Trending Tech

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3090 ?

You’re right to think about where sustainable technology is needed most! Here are some key areas where the sustainable aspects of a graphics card like the RTX 3090 are particularly important:

Data Centers: Large data centers consume massive amounts of energy for computation and cooling. Improving the energy efficiency of GPUs used in these facilities has a significant impact on overall energy consumption and carbon footprint.
High-Performance Computing (HPC): Scientific research, simulations, and complex calculations often rely on HPC systems with numerous GPUs. Sustainable technology helps to reduce the environmental impact of these computationally intensive tasks.
Cloud Computing: Cloud providers use vast numbers of GPUs to deliver services like AI, gaming, and content creation. Improving the sustainability of these GPUs contributes to a greener cloud.
AI and Machine Learning: Training complex AI models requires significant computational power, often provided by GPUs. Sustainable technology helps to reduce the energy consumption and environmental impact of AI development.
Gaming and Content Creation: While individual gamers and content creators may have a smaller impact, the collective energy consumption of this large user base is significant. Sustainable technology in gaming and content creation GPUs can contribute to a more environmentally friendly entertainment industry.
Emerging Technologies: As new technologies like virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) become more prevalent, the demand for powerful GPUs will increase. Sustainable technology is crucial to ensure that these technologies are developed and used in an environmentally responsible manner.

In essence, sustainable technology in GPUs is needed wherever these powerful processors are used, from massive data centers to individual workstations. By focusing on energy efficiency, responsible manufacturing, and recycling, we can minimize the environmental impact of these essential components of modern technology.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3090 ?

You’re asking a great question that gets at the heart of why sustainable technology is so important! Here’s how sustainable technology is required in the context of a powerful graphics card like the RTX 3090:

1. To Reduce Environmental Impact:

Lower Energy Consumption: Sustainable technology pushes for more energy-efficient designs, like the Ampere architecture in the RTX 3090. This means less power is needed to achieve the same performance, reducing electricity consumption and the associated carbon footprint.
Minimize Resource Usage: Sustainable manufacturing aims to use fewer raw materials and prioritize recycled or renewable resources. This helps conserve precious metals and reduce the environmental impact of mining and processing them.
Decrease Pollution: Sustainable technology seeks to minimize the use of harmful chemicals and pollutants during manufacturing. This protects workers and reduces the risk of environmental contamination.

2. To Address E-waste:

Extend Product Lifecycles: Sustainable technology encourages the design of durable and long-lasting products. This reduces the need for frequent replacements, thus minimizing the generation of electronic waste.
Promote Responsible Recycling: Sustainable technology emphasizes the importance of proper recycling and disposal of electronic devices. This ensures that valuable materials are recovered and hazardous waste is handled safely.

3. To Improve Efficiency and Reduce Costs:

Optimize Performance per Watt: Sustainable technology drives innovation in energy efficiency, leading to better performance per watt. This can translate to lower operating costs for users, especially in energy-intensive applications like data centers and high-performance computing.
Reduce Heat Generation: Sustainable technology often focuses on improving cooling solutions and reducing heat generation. This can lead to more stable and reliable performance, as well as lower cooling costs.

4. To Meet Growing Demand:

Support Technological Advancement: As technology advances, the demand for powerful graphics cards like the RTX 3090 will continue to grow. Sustainable technology is essential to meet this demand in an environmentally responsible way.
Enable Future Innovation: By focusing on sustainability, we can ensure that future generations have access to the resources and technology they need to continue pushing the boundaries of innovation.

In essence, sustainable technology is not just a trend but a necessity. It’s how we can ensure that powerful graphics cards like the RTX 3090 can be used to drive progress and innovation without compromising the health of our planet or the well-being of future generations.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3090 ?

While a full-blown case study with in-depth research and data analysis would be quite extensive, we can outline the key elements of a potential case study on the sustainable technology of the RTX 3090. Here’s a framework:

Case Study Title: Evaluating the Sustainability of the RTX 3090: A Balancing Act Between Performance and Environmental Impact

1. Introduction:

Briefly introduce the RTX 3090 as a high-performance graphics card and its target audience (gamers, content creators, researchers).
Highlight the growing importance of sustainability in technology and the need to assess the environmental impact of powerful hardware like the RTX 3090.
State the case study’s objective: to analyze the sustainable aspects of the RTX 3090, considering its design, manufacturing, usage, and end-of-life management.

2. Background:

Discuss the key sustainability challenges associated with high-performance graphics cards, such as energy consumption, e-waste generation, and resource depletion.
Briefly explain the concept of sustainable technology and its key principles (e.g., energy efficiency, resource conservation, pollution reduction, responsible recycling).

3. Analysis of Sustainable Features:

Improved Architecture: Analyze the energy efficiency gains achieved by the Ampere architecture compared to previous generations. Quantify the performance per watt improvements and their potential impact on reducing energy consumption.
Efficient Cooling Solutions: Examine the design and effectiveness of cooling solutions used in RTX 3090 models. Assess their impact on reducing heat generation and improving energy efficiency.
Longevity and Performance: Evaluate the lifespan and performance of the RTX 3090. Discuss how its high-end capabilities can reduce the need for frequent upgrades and minimize e-waste.
Manufacturing Processes: Investigate the manufacturing practices employed by different RTX 3090 manufacturers. Identify any sustainable initiatives, such as the use of recycled materials, reduced chemical usage, or energy-efficient production processes.
Recycling and Disposal: Analyze the options available for recycling or disposing of the RTX 3090 responsibly. Discuss the importance of proper e-waste management and the potential for recovering valuable materials.

4. Challenges and Trade-offs:

Acknowledge the inherent challenges in balancing high performance with sustainability. Discuss the trade-offs between power consumption and computational capabilities.
Address the limitations of current sustainable technologies in the context of high-performance graphics cards.

5. Recommendations:

Provide recommendations for consumers on how to use the RTX 3090 more sustainably (e.g., optimizing power settings, ensuring proper cooling, extending product lifespan, responsible recycling).
Suggest areas for future research and development in sustainable graphics card technology (e.g., exploring alternative materials, improving energy efficiency, developing more effective cooling solutions).

6. Conclusion:

Summarize the key findings of the case study and reiterate the importance of sustainability in the graphics card industry.
Emphasize the need for continued innovation and collaboration between manufacturers, consumers, and researchers to minimize the environmental impact of high-performance computing.

Data Sources:

Technical specifications and performance benchmarks of the RTX 3090.
Information on manufacturing processes and sustainability initiatives from RTX 3090 manufacturers.
Research papers and reports on sustainable technology in the electronics industry.
E-waste management and recycling guidelines.

This framework provides a starting point for a comprehensive case study. Remember that a real-world case study would require in-depth research, data collection, and analysis to support its findings and recommendations.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3090 ?

White Paper: The Sustainability Landscape of the RTX 3090

Abstract: The RTX 3090, a high-performance graphics processing unit (GPU), represents a significant advancement in computational power. However, its substantial energy demands and potential environmental impact necessitate a careful examination of its sustainability. This white paper explores the various facets of sustainability related to the RTX 3090, including its architecture, manufacturing, usage, and end-of-life management. It aims to provide a balanced perspective on the card’s environmental footprint and offer recommendations for mitigating its impact.

1. Introduction:

The relentless pursuit of higher performance in GPUs like the RTX 3090 has led to increased power consumption and potential environmental concerns. This white paper examines the sustainability implications of this powerful hardware, considering the full lifecycle from manufacturing to disposal. We will analyze the RTX 3090’s contributions to performance and its associated environmental costs, exploring opportunities for improvement and responsible usage.

2. The RTX 3090: Performance and Power:

The RTX 3090, based on NVIDIA’s Ampere architecture, delivers exceptional performance for gaming, content creation, and scientific computing. However, this performance comes at a cost. Its high power consumption raises concerns about energy usage and its carbon footprint. This section will detail the card’s specifications, performance benchmarks, and power consumption profiles.

3. Sustainability Considerations:

3.1. Architecture and Efficiency:

The Ampere architecture incorporates design elements aimed at improving power efficiency compared to previous generations. This section will analyze these architectural improvements and quantify their impact on energy consumption per unit of performance.

3.2. Manufacturing and Materials:

The manufacturing process of complex electronic devices like the RTX 3090 involves the use of various materials, some of which are rare or require energy-intensive extraction. This section will discuss the materials used in the RTX 3090 and explore the environmental impact of their sourcing and processing. It will also examine any sustainable manufacturing practices employed by manufacturers.

3.3. Usage and Energy Consumption:

The RTX 3090’s power consumption during operation is a key sustainability concern. This section will analyze typical usage scenarios and their associated energy demands. It will also discuss the impact of factors like workload intensity and cooling solutions on power consumption.

3.4. Cooling Solutions and Thermal Management:

Efficient cooling is crucial for maintaining the RTX 3090’s performance and longevity. This section will examine the various cooling solutions employed by different RTX 3090 models and their impact on energy efficiency and noise levels.

3.5. End-of-Life Management and Recycling:

Proper disposal and recycling of electronic devices are essential for minimizing environmental impact. This section will discuss the importance of responsible e-waste management and the potential for recovering valuable materials from the RTX 3090. It will also explore existing recycling programs and initiatives.

4. Mitigating the Environmental Impact:

4.1. Software Optimization and Power Management:

Users can play a role in reducing the RTX 3090’s environmental impact through software optimization and power management settings. This section will provide practical tips for minimizing energy consumption without sacrificing performance.

4.2. Hardware Selection and Usage Habits:

Choosing the right hardware for specific needs and adopting responsible usage habits can contribute to sustainability. This section will discuss the importance of considering performance requirements and avoiding unnecessary upgrades.

4.3. Manufacturer Initiatives and Industry Collaboration:

Manufacturers have a crucial role to play in promoting sustainable practices. This section will highlight existing initiatives by manufacturers to reduce the environmental impact of their products and discuss the importance of industry collaboration on sustainability standards.

5. Future Directions and Recommendations:

This white paper concludes by outlining future directions for research and development in sustainable GPU technology. It offers recommendations for manufacturers, consumers, and policymakers to minimize the environmental footprint of high-performance graphics cards like the RTX 3090. These recommendations include:

Continued research into more energy-efficient architectures and manufacturing processes.
Development of standardized sustainability metrics for GPUs.
Promotion of responsible e-waste management and recycling programs.
Increased consumer awareness of sustainable technology choices.

6. Conclusion:

The RTX 3090 represents a significant technological achievement, but its environmental impact cannot be ignored. By understanding the sustainability challenges associated with high-performance GPUs and adopting responsible practices, we can minimize their environmental footprint and ensure a more sustainable future for computing.

Note: This is a framework for a white paper. A real white paper would require significantly more in-depth research, data analysis, and specific examples to support its claims. It would also benefit from citations and references to relevant studies and reports.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3090 ?

You’re thinking ahead, which is great! While the RTX 3090 is primarily known for its use in gaming and content creation, its underlying technologies and the push for sustainability have implications for various industries:

1. Data Centers and Cloud Computing:

Efficient AI Workloads: Data centers are increasingly relying on GPUs for AI training and inference. The RTX 3090’s architecture, with its focus on performance per watt, can contribute to more energy-efficient AI operations in these facilities, reducing their environmental footprint.
Sustainable Cloud Services: Cloud providers are major consumers of GPUs. By incorporating more sustainable GPUs, they can offer cloud-based services with a lower environmental impact, attracting environmentally conscious clients.

2. Scientific Research and High-Performance Computing (HPC):

Greener Simulations: Researchers in fields like climate modeling, drug discovery, and materials science rely on HPC systems with numerous GPUs. Sustainable technology in GPUs can help reduce the energy consumption and carbon footprint of these computationally intensive simulations.
Accelerated Discoveries: By enabling faster and more efficient research, sustainable GPUs can indirectly contribute to advancements in fields like renewable energy, medicine, and environmental science.

3. Manufacturing and Design:

Sustainable Product Development: Designers and engineers use GPUs for tasks like 3D modeling, simulations, and rendering. Sustainable GPUs can help reduce the environmental impact of these processes, contributing to more eco-friendly product development.
Optimized Manufacturing Processes: AI-powered systems, often relying on GPUs, are used to optimize manufacturing processes, improve energy efficiency, and reduce waste. Sustainable GPUs can further enhance the environmental benefits of these systems.

4. Healthcare and Medical Imaging:

Efficient Medical Imaging: GPUs are used for processing and analyzing medical images, such as CT scans and MRIs. Sustainable GPUs can help reduce the energy consumption of these processes, making healthcare more environmentally friendly.
AI-Powered Diagnostics: AI algorithms, often running on GPUs, are used for disease detection and diagnosis. Sustainable GPUs can contribute to the efficiency and accessibility of these AI-powered healthcare solutions.

5. Energy and Utilities:

Smart Grids: AI and machine learning, often powered by GPUs, are used to optimize energy distribution and consumption in smart grids. Sustainable GPUs can help improve the efficiency and environmental performance of these systems.
Renewable Energy Integration: GPUs are used to analyze and optimize renewable energy sources like solar and wind power. Sustainable GPUs can contribute to the development and deployment of more efficient renewable energy technologies.

In general, the push for sustainability in GPUs like the RTX 3090 can have a ripple effect across various industries, contributing to more energy-efficient operations, reduced environmental impact, and the development of greener technologies.

It’s important to note that while the RTX 3090 has some sustainable features, it’s still a high-performance, power-consuming device. The ideal solution for industrial applications would be a combination of hardware advancements, software optimization, and responsible usage practices to maximize sustainability.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3090 ?

You’re hitting on a crucial point! Research and development (R&D) are essential for making GPUs like the RTX 3090 more sustainable. Here are some key areas where R&D efforts are focused:

1. Advanced Architectures:

Beyond Ampere: Research is ongoing to develop next-generation GPU architectures that offer even greater performance per watt. This involves exploring new ways to design the GPU’s core components, optimize data flow, and reduce energy leakage.
Specialized Hardware: Developing specialized hardware for specific tasks, like AI or rendering, can improve efficiency by reducing the need for general-purpose processing units.

2. Innovative Materials:

Alternative Substrates: Exploring alternative materials for the GPU’s substrate (the base on which components are mounted) can reduce the reliance on traditional materials with high environmental impact.
Recyclable Components: Researching and developing components that are easier to recycle and recover valuable materials from can contribute to a circular economy for GPUs.

3. Efficient Cooling Solutions:

Advanced Heat Dissipation: R&D is focused on developing more efficient cooling solutions, such as vapor chambers, liquid cooling, and even microfluidic cooling, to reduce heat generation and energy consumption.
Adaptive Cooling: Developing systems that can dynamically adjust cooling based on the GPU’s workload can further optimize energy usage and reduce noise.

4. Software Optimization:

Power-Aware Programming: Researching programming techniques that allow software to be more aware of the GPU’s power consumption can enable developers to write more energy-efficient code.
Workload Management: Developing software that can intelligently manage workloads and distribute tasks across multiple GPUs or other processing units can optimize resource utilization and reduce energy waste.

5. Manufacturing Processes:

Sustainable Fabrication: Researching and implementing more sustainable manufacturing processes can reduce the use of harmful chemicals, minimize waste, and lower the carbon footprint of GPU production.
Closed-Loop Systems: Exploring the possibility of creating closed-loop manufacturing systems where materials are recovered and reused can further reduce environmental impact.

6. End-of-Life Management:

Improved Recycling Technologies: R&D is needed to develop more effective and efficient technologies for recycling GPUs and recovering valuable materials.
Extended Lifespan Strategies: Researching ways to extend the lifespan of GPUs, such as through software updates, repairs, or repurposing, can help reduce e-waste.

Collaboration and Funding:

Industry Partnerships: Collaboration between GPU manufacturers, research institutions, and other stakeholders is crucial for accelerating the development of sustainable GPU technology.
Government Support: Government funding and policies can play a significant role in promoting research and innovation in sustainable technology.

By investing in these areas of R&D, we can pave the way for more sustainable GPUs that deliver

high performance without compromising the environment.Sources and related content

COURTESY : RBC

Reference

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.