Sustainable Technology of 3080

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 3080 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3080 ?

It appears you’re asking about the sustainability of the technology used in the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 graphics card. Here’s a breakdown of how it addresses sustainability:

1. Efficiency and Performance

  • Ampere Architecture: The 3080 is built on Nvidia’s Ampere architecture, which focuses on improved performance per watt compared to previous generations. This means more processing power with less energy consumption.  
  • Improved Power Efficiency: Ampere Streaming Multiprocessors bring 2x the FP32 throughput and improved power efficiency.
  • Reduced Turbulence: Features like optimized fan rotation and heatsink designs aim to improve cooling efficiency, potentially reducing the need for excessive fan speeds and power usage.  

2. Manufacturing and Materials

  • Auto-Extreme Manufacturing: This automated process improves manufacturing precision and reduces waste compared to traditional methods.
  • Durable Components: The use of high-quality components, like dual ball fan bearings and military-grade capacitors, can extend the card’s lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements.  

3. Extended Lifespan

  • Robust Cooling Solutions: The 3080 incorporates advanced cooling systems to maintain optimal temperatures. This can contribute to the card’s longevity and reliable performance over time.  
  • Software Support: Nvidia provides ongoing driver updates and software support, which can help users maximize the card’s performance and extend its usability.  

Important Considerations

  • Power Consumption: Despite efficiency improvements, the 3080 is still a high-performance card with significant power demands. Users should consider their overall system power consumption.
  • E-waste: Like all electronics, improper disposal of a 3080 can contribute to e-waste issues. Responsible recycling is essential.

Overall, the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 incorporates several design and manufacturing elements that contribute to improved sustainability compared to previous generations. However, the environmental impact of high-performance computing remains an ongoing challenge for the industry.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 3080 ?

While the term “sustainable technology” isn’t officially used to describe the RTX 3080, we can look at its features through a lens of sustainability:

1. Efficiency is Key:

  • Ampere Architecture: The 3080 is built on Nvidia’s Ampere architecture, which delivers significant performance gains per watt compared to older generations. This means you get more computing power for the same (or even less) energy consumption.  
  • Optimized Thermals: Improved fan designs and heatsinks ensure efficient cooling. This reduces the need for excessive fan speeds, saving energy and potentially prolonging the card’s lifespan.  

2. Manufacturing with a Mindful Approach:

  • Auto-Extreme Manufacturing: This automated process increases precision and reduces waste during manufacturing compared to traditional methods.
  • Durable Components: High-quality components like dual ball fan bearings and military-grade capacitors are used, which can extend the card’s lifespan and reduce the need for replacements.  

3. Longevity Matters:

  • Robust Cooling: Effective cooling solutions help maintain optimal operating temperatures, contributing to the card’s long-term reliability and performance.
  • Software Support: Nvidia provides continuous driver updates and software support, ensuring users can maximize the card’s performance and usability for an extended period.

Important Notes:

  • Power Consumption: Despite efficiency improvements, the 3080 is a high-performance card with substantial power demands. Consider your overall system power consumption.
  • E-waste: Like all electronics, proper disposal is crucial. Responsible recycling is essential to minimize the environmental impact.

In essence, the RTX 3080 incorporates design and manufacturing elements that contribute to improved sustainability compared to previous generations. However, the environmental footprint of high-performance computing remains an ongoing challenge for the industry.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3080 ?

While everyone benefits from more sustainable technology in general, here are some groups who might find the “sustainable technology” aspects of the RTX 3080 particularly relevant:

  • Gamers and Content Creators:
    • Those who are environmentally conscious and want to reduce their impact.
    • Users who appreciate longer-lasting hardware, reducing the need for frequent upgrades.
    • Individuals looking to save on electricity costs due to improved power efficiency.
  • Professionals and Businesses:
    • Companies with sustainability goals or initiatives.
    • Organizations seeking to reduce their carbon footprint from technology usage.
    • Businesses looking for reliable and durable hardware for long-term use.
  • Tech Enthusiasts and Early Adopters:
    • Individuals who value innovation and seek out the latest advancements in efficient technology.
    • Those who want to support manufacturers who are taking steps towards more sustainable practices.

It’s important to remember that even though the RTX 3080 has some sustainable features, it’s still a high-performance component with significant power demands. For those with very strict sustainability goals, exploring options with lower power consumption might be necessary.

Ultimately, the “need” for the sustainable technology aspects of the RTX 3080 depends on individual priorities and values.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3080 ?

The need for the sustainable technology aspects of the RTX 3080 becomes more pressing in certain situations:

1. When Power Consumption is a Major Concern:

  • Rising Electricity Costs: If you live in an area with high electricity prices, the 3080’s efficiency improvements can help mitigate the costs associated with running a high-performance card.
  • Limited Power Supply: In situations with limited power availability (e.g., off-grid setups or areas with unreliable power grids), the 3080’s reduced power consumption compared to older generations can be a significant advantage.

2. When Longevity and Reliability are Crucial:

  • Long-term Investment: If you plan to use the card for an extended period, the 3080’s durable components and robust cooling system can contribute to a longer lifespan, reducing the need for replacements.  
  • Mission-Critical Applications: For professionals or businesses relying on the 3080 for demanding tasks, its reliability and stability are essential for uninterrupted workflows.

3. When Environmental Impact is a Priority:

  • Personal Values: If you are environmentally conscious, the 3080’s sustainable features align with your values and desire to reduce your carbon footprint.
  • Corporate Sustainability Goals: Companies with sustainability initiatives may prioritize the 3080 for its improved efficiency and reduced environmental impact.

4. When Future-Proofing is Desired:

  • Evolving Software and Games: The 3080’s performance and ongoing software support ensure it remains relevant and capable of handling future software and gaming demands for a longer time.

In summary, the need for the sustainable technology aspects of the RTX 3080 is heightened when factors like power consumption, longevity, environmental impact, and future-proofing are significant considerations for the user.

COURTESY : Trending Tech

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3080 ?

You’re right to think about where sustainable tech is most needed! Here’s where the “sustainable technology” aspects of the RTX 3080 are particularly valuable:

  • Data Centers: These facilities use massive amounts of energy for computation and cooling. Even small efficiency improvements, like those in the 3080, can lead to significant energy savings on a large scale.  
  • High-Performance Computing (HPC) Environments: Scientific research, simulations, and AI training often require immense processing power. The 3080’s efficiency is crucial in these settings to manage energy consumption and reduce operational costs.  
  • Resource-Constrained Environments: In areas with limited access to reliable power or where energy costs are high, the 3080’s efficiency can make high-performance computing more accessible.
  • Organizations with Sustainability Goals: Companies committed to reducing their environmental footprint will find the 3080 a good fit, as it balances performance with improved sustainability.
  • Individual Users with Environmental Concerns: Gamers, content creators, and other users who prioritize sustainability can choose the 3080 to minimize their impact without sacrificing performance.

Essentially, anywhere high-performance computing is needed, but energy efficiency and environmental impact are also important factors, the “sustainable technology” of the RTX 3080 is beneficial.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3080 ?

It’s great you’re thinking about the “how” of sustainable tech! Here’s how the RTX 3080 achieves its sustainability improvements:

1. Architectural Efficiency:

  • Ampere Architecture: This is the foundation. Ampere is designed to deliver more performance per watt compared to previous Nvidia GPU architectures. Think of it like a more efficient engine in a car – it gets you further with the same amount of fuel.

2. Thermal Management:

  • Advanced Cooling Solutions: The 3080 has improved fan designs, heatsinks, and airflow management. This allows the card to stay cooler without needing to spin the fans as fast, which saves energy and can reduce noise.  
  • Reduced Turbulence: Optimizations in the cooling system minimize air turbulence, further improving cooling efficiency and reducing the energy needed for fan operation.

3. Manufacturing Processes:

  • Auto-Extreme Manufacturing: This automated process increases precision in manufacturing, which reduces waste and improves the overall quality and consistency of the cards.  

4. Component Selection:

  • Durable Components: Nvidia uses high-quality components like dual ball fan bearings and military-grade capacitors. These components are designed to last longer, reducing the need for replacements and minimizing e-waste in the long run.  

5. Software and Support:

  • Driver Updates and Optimization: Nvidia provides ongoing driver updates and software support. This ensures that the card can continue to perform optimally and efficiently over time, maximizing its lifespan.

In essence, the RTX 3080’s sustainability comes from a combination of more efficient design, better thermal management, improved manufacturing, and a focus on longevity. It’s not just one thing, but a holistic approach that makes the card more environmentally friendly compared to previous generations.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3080 ?

A true “case study” in the academic sense would require in-depth research and data analysis. However, we can construct a hypothetical case study outline to illustrate how one might assess the sustainability of the RTX 3080:

Hypothetical Case Study: Evaluating the Sustainable Technology of the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

1. Introduction:

  • Briefly describe the RTX 3080 and its target market.
  • State the purpose of the case study: to evaluate the card’s sustainability features.
  • Define the scope: focus on energy efficiency, material usage, manufacturing processes, and lifecycle impact.

2. Methodology:

  • Data Collection: This would involve gathering information from Nvidia’s official specifications, independent reviews, and potentially lifecycle assessments (LCAs) if available. We’d need to analyze power consumption data under various workloads, material composition information, and details about manufacturing processes.
  • Metrics: Key metrics could include:
    • Performance per watt (FPS/watt) compared to previous generations.
    • Energy consumption under typical usage scenarios.
    • Material composition and recyclability.
    • Manufacturing waste reduction.
    • Estimated lifespan and potential for reuse/repurposing.
  • Comparison: The 3080’s data would be compared to previous generation cards (e.g., RTX 2080) and potentially competing cards from other manufacturers.

3. Findings (Hypothetical):

  • Energy Efficiency: The case study might find that the 3080 demonstrates a significant improvement in performance per watt compared to the 2080, resulting in lower energy consumption for the same level of performance. Data would be presented to support this.
  • Materials: The analysis might reveal the types of materials used in the card and assess their recyclability. It could explore whether any conflict minerals are used and if Nvidia has responsible sourcing policies.
  • Manufacturing: The case study would examine Nvidia’s manufacturing processes, specifically focusing on the Auto-Extreme Manufacturing process and its impact on waste reduction and environmental impact.
  • Lifecycle Impact: This section would consider the card’s estimated lifespan, potential for upgrades or repairs, and responsible disposal/recycling options. It might estimate the overall carbon footprint of the card over its lifetime.

4. Discussion:

  • Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the 3080’s sustainability features.
  • Discuss the trade-offs between performance and sustainability.
  • Compare the 3080’s sustainability performance to other high-performance GPUs.

5. Conclusion:

  • Summarize the key findings and provide an overall assessment of the 3080’s sustainability.
  • Offer recommendations for future improvements in GPU sustainability.

Limitations:

  • A hypothetical case study relies on publicly available information, which may be limited.
  • A full LCA would require more detailed data and analysis.

It’s important to remember this is a hypothetical outline. A real case study would involve much more rigorous research and data analysis. However, this framework provides a starting point for understanding how one might approach evaluating the sustainability of a GPU like the RTX 3080.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3080 ?

Unfortunately, a dedicated white paper specifically focusing on the “Sustainable Technology of the RTX 3080” doesn’t appear to exist. However, we can piece together information from various sources to get a good understanding:

1. Nvidia’s Official Information:

  • Ampere Architecture: Nvidia provides details about the Ampere architecture on their website and in technical documentation. This information highlights the architectural improvements that contribute to increased performance per watt.
  • Product Pages and Specifications: The official product pages for the RTX 3080 often mention key features related to power efficiency, cooling, and manufacturing processes.
  • Blog Posts and Articles: Nvidia occasionally publishes blog posts or articles that delve deeper into specific technologies or initiatives related to sustainability.

2. Independent Reviews and Analyses:

  • Tech Websites and Publications: Websites like AnandTech, Tom’s Hardware, and Gamers Nexus often conduct in-depth reviews of GPUs, including detailed analysis of power consumption, thermal performance, and noise levels.
  • Lifecycle Assessments (LCAs): While not always readily available for specific GPUs, some organizations or researchers may conduct LCAs to assess the environmental impact of electronic devices throughout their lifecycle.

3. Industry Reports and Initiatives:

  • Sustainable Electronics Organizations: Organizations like the EPEAT (Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool) and the Sustainable Electronics Coalition may have resources or reports related to sustainable GPU design and manufacturing.
  • Industry Trends: Keeping up with trends in sustainable technology within the semiconductor industry can provide context for understanding the RTX 3080’s sustainability features.

How to Find the Information:

  • Nvidia Website: Start with the official Nvidia website and search for information on the Ampere architecture, the RTX 3080 product page, and any related sustainability initiatives.
  • Tech Review Sites: Explore reputable tech websites and publications for in-depth reviews of the RTX 3080, paying close attention to sections on power consumption, thermals, and efficiency.
  • Academic Databases and Search Engines: Use keywords like “GPU sustainability,” “lifecycle assessment of GPUs,” or “energy-efficient GPUs” to find relevant research papers or reports.

While a single, comprehensive white paper may not be available, gathering information from these various sources can help you build a strong understanding of the sustainable technology aspects of the RTX 3080.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3080 ?

You’re thinking about the bigger picture, which is great! Here are some industrial applications where the “sustainable technology” aspects of the RTX 3080, particularly its efficiency, can be valuable:

  • AI and Machine Learning: Training complex AI models requires massive computational power. The 3080’s improved performance per watt means that companies can train models faster while consuming less energy, reducing both costs and environmental impact. This is crucial in fields like:
    • Medical Imaging: Analyzing medical scans for faster and more accurate diagnoses.  
    • Financial Modeling: Predicting market trends and managing risk.
    • Autonomous Vehicles: Training self-driving systems to perceive and react to their environment.
  • Scientific Research: Researchers in various fields rely on simulations and data analysis. The 3080 can accelerate these processes, enabling faster breakthroughs in areas like:
    • Climate Modeling: Simulating climate change scenarios to understand future impacts.
    • Drug Discovery: Screening vast libraries of compounds to identify potential drug candidates.
    • Materials Science: Designing new materials with specific properties.
  • High-Performance Computing (HPC): Industries that depend on HPC can benefit from the 3080’s efficiency:
    • Oil and Gas Exploration: Processing seismic data to identify potential oil and gas reserves.
    • Engineering and Design: Running complex simulations for product design and optimization.
    • Manufacturing: Optimizing production processes and improving quality control.
  • Edge Computing: As more processing moves to the edge of the network, the 3080’s efficiency becomes crucial:
    • Smart Cities: Analyzing data from sensors to optimize traffic flow and resource management.
    • Industrial Automation: Enabling real-time decision-making in manufacturing processes.
    • Remote Sensing: Processing data from satellites and drones for environmental monitoring and agriculture.

In all these applications, the RTX 3080’s combination of high performance and improved energy efficiency offers a compelling solution for industries looking to reduce their environmental footprint while maintaining cutting-edge capabilities.Sources and related conte

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3080 ?

You’re asking a really interesting question that gets to the heart of how technology evolves! Here’s how research and development play a role in the sustainable technology of the RTX 3080 and GPUs in general:

1. Architectural Advancements:

  • New Architectures: Nvidia’s Ampere architecture, which underlies the 3080, is a product of years of R&D. Researchers and engineers work on designing new GPU architectures that deliver higher performance per watt. This involves innovations in:
    • Transistor Design: Creating smaller and more efficient transistors to pack more processing power onto the chip.
    • Memory Systems: Developing faster and more energy-efficient memory technologies (like GDDR6X) to feed data to the GPU.
    • Interconnects: Designing efficient ways for different parts of the GPU to communicate with each other.

2. Thermal Management:

  • Cooling Solutions: R&D efforts focus on developing more effective cooling solutions to dissipate heat generated by powerful GPUs. This includes:
    • Fan Design: Optimizing fan blade shapes and airflow to maximize cooling while minimizing noise and power consumption.
    • Heatsink Materials: Exploring new materials with better thermal conductivity to transfer heat away from the GPU.  
    • Vapor Chambers and Heat Pipes: Using advanced cooling technologies to efficiently move heat.

3. Manufacturing Processes:

  • Advanced Fabrication: Semiconductor manufacturers are constantly developing new fabrication processes to create smaller and more efficient chips. This involves:
    • Lithography: Using advanced techniques to etch incredibly fine patterns onto silicon wafers.
    • Materials Science: Exploring new materials and processes to improve chip performance and reduce energy consumption.

4. Software Optimization:

  • Drivers and APIs: Nvidia invests in developing software drivers and APIs that optimize the performance and efficiency of their GPUs. This includes:
    • Compiler Optimizations: Creating compilers that can translate code into instructions that run most efficiently on the GPU.
    • Power Management: Developing software algorithms to dynamically adjust the GPU’s power consumption based on the workload.  

5. Lifecycle Considerations:

  • Durability and Reliability: Research into more durable components and manufacturing processes can extend the lifespan of GPUs, reducing the need for replacements.
  • Recycling and Reuse: Exploring ways to make GPUs easier to recycle or repurpose at the end of their life can minimize e-waste.

Looking Ahead:

  • Future Architectures: Research into next-generation GPU architectures will likely focus even more on energy efficiency and sustainability.
  • Specialized Hardware: We may see the development of specialized hardware for specific tasks (like AI training) that are optimized for energy efficiency.
  • Quantum Computing: While still in its early stages, quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize computing and could lead to even more sustainable solutions in the long term.  

In essence, the sustainable technology of the RTX 3080 is built on a foundation of ongoing research and development in various areas of hardware and software engineering. This continuous innovation is key to making GPUs more powerful and more environmentally friendly.Sources and related content

COURTESY : RBC

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »