Sustainable Technology of 3060

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 2020, Sustainable Technology of 3060 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3060 ?

The term “sustainable technology” refers to innovations that consider the environment and promote economic and social progress. These technologies aim to minimize environmental risks and create sustainable products and processes.

Some examples of sustainable technology include:

  • Renewable energy sources: Solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power.
  • Energy-efficient devices: LED lighting, smart thermostats, and energy-efficient appliances.
  • Sustainable transportation: Electric vehicles, hybrid cars, and public transportation.
  • Green building materials: Recycled materials, sustainably harvested wood, and energy-efficient insulation.
  • Water conservation technologies: Low-flow toilets, rainwater harvesting systems, and drip irrigation.
  • Waste management solutions: Recycling programs, composting systems, and waste-to-energy plants.

In the context of the RTX 3060 graphics card, sustainability might refer to aspects like:

  • Energy efficiency: The 3060 is designed to offer a good performance-per-watt ratio, meaning it delivers strong graphics performance while consuming relatively less power.
  • Manufacturing process: While not specific to the 3060, manufacturers are increasingly focusing on sustainable manufacturing practices, including reducing waste, using recycled materials, and minimizing the environmental impact of production.
  • Longevity: A durable and well-performing graphics card like the 3060 can have a longer lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements and minimizing electronic waste.

It’s important to note that while the RTX 3060 itself may incorporate some sustainable elements, the overall sustainability of its use also depends on factors like the energy source powering the computer it’s used in and the user’s practices regarding energy consumption and e-waste disposal.

For more information on sustainable technology, you can refer to resources like:

Additionally, you can explore the manufacturers’ websites (like NVIDIA for the RTX 3060) for information on their sustainability initiatives and practices.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3060 ?

While the RTX 3060 itself might not be explicitly marketed as a “sustainable” product, it incorporates certain features and technologies that contribute to sustainability in the context of graphics cards:

1. Energy Efficiency:

  • The RTX 3060 is based on NVIDIA’s Ampere architecture, which is designed to deliver a good balance of performance and power efficiency. This means it can provide strong graphics performance while consuming relatively less power compared to some older or less efficient GPUs.
  • Lower power consumption translates to reduced electricity usage and can contribute to lower carbon footprint, especially if the electricity source is renewable.

2. Manufacturing Process:

  • Although specific details about the 3060’s manufacturing process may vary, manufacturers like NVIDIA are generally moving towards more sustainable practices. This can include:
    • Reducing waste during production.
    • Using recycled materials where possible.
    • Minimizing the environmental impact of manufacturing facilities.
  • Some manufacturers also use automated manufacturing processes that reduce thermal strain on components and avoid the use of harsh cleaning chemicals, leading to less environmental impact.

3. Longevity:

  • The RTX 3060 is a mid-range to high-end graphics card that offers good performance for current games and applications. This means it can have a longer lifespan compared to lower-end cards, reducing the need for frequent replacements.
  • A longer lifespan means less electronic waste (e-waste) generated over time.

4. Features that promote efficient use:

  • Features like NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) can help improve performance in games without requiring the GPU to work as hard. DLSS uses AI to upscale images, effectively rendering the game at a lower resolution and then upscaling it, which reduces the load on the GPU and can save energy.

Important Considerations:

  • Overall system efficiency: The sustainability of using an RTX 3060 also depends on the overall efficiency of the computer system it’s installed in. A power-efficient CPU, RAM, and storage devices will contribute to lower energy consumption.
  • Energy source: The source of electricity powering the computer is a significant factor. Using renewable energy sources like solar or wind power will further reduce the environmental impact.
  • User practices: User habits also play a role. Turning off the computer when not in use, managing power settings, and properly disposing of the graphics card when it’s no longer needed are important for minimizing environmental impact.

In summary, while the RTX 3060 might not be a “sustainability-focused” product in its marketing, it incorporates elements of energy efficiency, manufacturing improvements, and features that can contribute to a more sustainable use of graphics card technology. The overall sustainability, however, depends on a combination of factors including the system it’s used in and the user’s practices.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3060 ?

The need for sustainable technology with the RTX 3060, or any technology for that matter, is driven by a collective responsibility rather than a specific individual or group. However, we can identify key stakeholders who are particularly invested in and benefit from the sustainable aspects of the RTX 3060:

1. Environmentally Conscious Consumers:

  • Gamers and PC users who are aware of the environmental impact of their technology choices.
  • They seek energy-efficient components to reduce their carbon footprint and contribute to a greener future.
  • They appreciate manufacturers who adopt sustainable practices and prioritize environmental responsibility.

2. Manufacturers:

  • Companies like NVIDIA and their partners are increasingly focusing on sustainability to meet consumer demand and regulatory requirements.
  • They invest in energy-efficient designs, sustainable manufacturing processes, and recycling programs to reduce their environmental impact.
  • This also aligns with their long-term business goals by ensuring resource availability and reducing costs.

3. Society as a Whole:

  • The broader community benefits from sustainable technology through reduced pollution, conservation of resources, and a healthier environment.
  • Sustainable practices in the tech industry contribute to global efforts to combat climate change and promote a sustainable future.

4. Future Generations:

  • By adopting sustainable technology now, we ensure a healthier planet and a more sustainable future for generations to come.
  • Reducing e-waste, conserving energy, and minimizing environmental impact are crucial for preserving resources and protecting the environment for future use.

In essence, everyone has a stake in the sustainable technology of the RTX 3060 and other tech products. It’s a shared responsibility to minimize the environmental impact of technology and promote a more sustainable future.

While the RTX 3060 itself may have some sustainable features, it’s important to remember that the overall sustainability also depends on how it’s used and the choices made by consumers and manufacturers alike. By being mindful of energy consumption, e-waste disposal, and supporting sustainable practices, we can collectively contribute to a more environmentally friendly tech industry.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3060 ?

The need for sustainable technology with the RTX 3060, and technology in general, isn’t tied to a specific point in time but is an ongoing and increasingly urgent requirement. Here’s why:

  • Environmental Concerns: Climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are pressing global issues. Sustainable technology is crucial to mitigate these problems by reducing energy consumption, minimizing waste, and promoting responsible resource management.
  • Resource Scarcity: Many of the materials used in manufacturing technology, including graphics cards, are finite. Sustainable practices like recycling and efficient use of resources are essential to ensure the long-term availability of these materials.
  • Economic Benefits: Energy-efficient technologies can lead to lower operating costs for consumers and businesses. Sustainable practices can also create new economic opportunities in areas like renewable energy and recycling.
  • Ethical Considerations: Sustainable technology aligns with ethical principles of environmental stewardship and social responsibility. It promotes a more equitable and sustainable future for all.

In the context of the RTX 3060, the need for sustainable technology is relevant throughout its lifecycle:

  • During Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing processes are needed to minimize the environmental impact of producing the graphics card, including reducing energy consumption, water usage, and waste generation.
  • During Use: Energy-efficient design and features like NVIDIA DLSS can help reduce the power consumption of the RTX 3060 during its operational life, lowering electricity bills and carbon footprint.
  • At End-of-Life: Proper disposal and recycling of the RTX 3060 are essential to prevent e-waste from polluting the environment and recover valuable materials for reuse.

The need for sustainable technology is not a one-time event but a continuous effort. As technology advances and environmental challenges grow, it becomes even more critical to prioritize sustainability in the design, manufacturing, use, and disposal of tech products like the RTX 3060.

By embracing sustainable practices and supporting companies that prioritize environmental responsibility, we can collectively contribute to a more sustainable future for the tech industry and the planet

.courtesy : Accenture

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3060 ?

You’re right to ask “where” sustainability is required for the RTX 3060! It’s not just one place, but rather a throughout the entire lifecycle of the product. Here’s a breakdown:

  • Manufacturing: This is where a significant portion of the environmental impact occurs. Sustainable practices are needed in:
    • Sourcing materials: Using recycled or sustainably sourced materials where possible.
    • Production processes: Minimizing energy consumption, water usage, and waste generation during the manufacturing of the card and its components.
    • Packaging: Using eco-friendly and recyclable packaging materials.
  • Use: Even after it’s in your computer, sustainability matters:
    • Energy efficiency: The RTX 3060 should be designed to consume minimal power while delivering optimal performance. This reduces electricity usage and lowers the carbon footprint.
    • Software optimization: Features like NVIDIA DLSS can help improve performance without requiring the GPU to work as hard, further reducing energy consumption.
  • End-of-life: What happens to the card when you’re done with it is crucial:
    • Recycling: Proper disposal and recycling are essential to prevent e-waste from polluting the environment and recover valuable materials for reuse.
    • Extended lifespan: Designing a durable and high-performing card like the RTX 3060 can extend its lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements and minimizing e-waste.

Essentially, sustainable technology is required at every stage of the RTX 3060’s life cycle, from its creation to its eventual disposal or recycling. It’s a shared responsibility between manufacturers, consumers, and even policymakers to ensure that technology like the RTX 3060 is produced and used in a way that minimizes its environmental impact.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3060 ?

That’s a great question! It’s important to understand how sustainable technology is implemented in something like the RTX 3060. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Design and Engineering:

  • Energy Efficiency: This is a primary focus. Engineers optimize the architecture of the GPU (like the Ampere architecture in the 3060) to maximize performance while minimizing power consumption. This involves things like:
    • Reducing power leakage in transistors
    • Optimizing data flow within the chip
    • Using efficient memory technologies
  • Component Selection: Choosing components that are themselves manufactured sustainably and have a long lifespan.
  • Thermal Management: Designing efficient cooling solutions so the card doesn’t overheat and require excessive fan power, which wastes energy.

2. Manufacturing Processes:

  • Resource Reduction: Minimizing the use of raw materials in the production of the card and its components.
  • Recycled Materials: Incorporating recycled materials where possible, reducing the need to extract new resources.
  • Waste Reduction: Implementing manufacturing processes that minimize waste generation and maximize material utilization.
  • Energy-Efficient Factories: Using renewable energy sources and implementing energy-saving measures in manufacturing facilities.

3. Software and Features:

  • Driver Optimizations: Developing software drivers that optimize performance and power consumption.
  • Features like DLSS: Implementing features that improve performance without requiring the GPU to work as hard, reducing energy usage.

4. End-of-Life Management:

  • Recyclability: Designing the card with materials that are easily recyclable and providing information on how to properly recycle the product.
  • Take-back Programs: Implementing programs where consumers can return old graphics cards for recycling or refurbishment.

5. Transparency and Reporting:

  • Sustainability Reports: Publishing reports that detail the environmental impact of the product and the company’s sustainability initiatives.
  • Environmental Certifications: Obtaining certifications like Energy Star or EPEAT to demonstrate the product’s environmental performance.

It’s important to note that achieving sustainability is an ongoing process. Manufacturers are constantly researching and implementing new ways to reduce the environmental impact of their products, and consumers play a crucial role by making informed choices and supporting sustainable practices.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3060 ?

Unfortunately, there isn’t a widely published, formal case study specifically on the sustainable technology of the RTX 3060. This is often the case with individual components. However, we can construct a sort of “case study” by examining the RTX 3060 through the lens of sustainable technology principles, drawing on available information:

Case Study: Sustainable Technology in the RTX 3060

Introduction:

The RTX 3060, while primarily designed for performance, incorporates several elements that contribute to its sustainability profile. This “case study” will examine these elements, considering both the card itself and its place within the broader context of PC gaming and technology.

Methodology:

This analysis draws on publicly available information from NVIDIA, industry reports, and reviews to assess the RTX 3060’s sustainability performance.

Findings:

  1. Energy Efficiency: The RTX 3060, based on the Ampere architecture, demonstrates a strong performance-per-watt ratio. This means it delivers good graphics performance while consuming relatively less power compared to older or less efficient GPUs. This contributes to lower electricity consumption and a reduced carbon footprint, especially when used in conjunction with a power-efficient system.
  2. Manufacturing: While specific details may vary, manufacturers like NVIDIA are generally moving towards more sustainable manufacturing practices. This includes efforts to reduce waste, use recycled materials where possible, and minimize the environmental impact of production facilities. The use of automated manufacturing processes, which reduce thermal strain on components and avoid harsh cleaning chemicals, also contributes to a more sustainable production process.
  3. Longevity: The RTX 3060 is a mid-range to high-end graphics card that offers good performance for current games and applications. This can translate to a longer lifespan compared to lower-end cards, reducing the need for frequent replacements and minimizing e-waste.
  4. Software and Features: Features like NVIDIA DLSS can further enhance sustainability. By improving performance without requiring the GPU to work as hard, DLSS can contribute to lower energy consumption.

Discussion:

The RTX 3060 demonstrates that sustainability can be integrated into graphics card design without compromising performance. Its energy efficiency, coupled with potential improvements in manufacturing and a longer lifespan, contribute to a more sustainable use of graphics technology.

However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that the RTX 3060’s sustainability is part of a larger picture. The overall environmental impact also depends on factors like:

  • The energy source powering the computer.
  • The efficiency of the entire system.
  • User practices regarding energy consumption and e-waste disposal.

Conclusion:

The RTX 3060 represents a step towards more sustainable graphics technology. By focusing on energy efficiency, manufacturing improvements, and features that promote efficient use, it contributes to reducing the environmental impact of PC gaming. However, continued efforts are needed to further enhance sustainability throughout the lifecycle of graphics cards, from manufacturing to end-of-life management.

Recommendations:

  • Manufacturers should continue to prioritize energy efficiency and sustainable manufacturing practices.
  • Consumers should be mindful of their energy consumption and properly dispose of or recycle their graphics cards.
  • Further research and development are needed to explore new materials and technologies that can further reduce the environmental impact of graphics cards.

This “case study” highlights the importance of considering sustainability in the design and use of graphics cards like the RTX 3060. By embracing sustainable practices, the tech industry and consumers can collectively contribute to a more environmentally friendly future for gaming and technology.

courtesy : Trending Tech

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3060 ?

Creating a full academic white paper requires extensive research, data analysis, and peer review. I can’t produce that. However, I can give you a structured outline and suggest areas for research if you wish to develop a white paper on the sustainable technology aspects of the RTX 3060 (or a similar GPU).

Title: A White Paper: Evaluating the Sustainable Technology Aspects of the NVIDIA RTX 3060 (or similar GPU)

Abstract: (Write this last) Briefly summarize the paper’s focus, methodology, key findings, and conclusions regarding the sustainability of the RTX 3060.

1. Introduction:

  • Define sustainable technology and its importance in the context of consumer electronics, specifically graphics processing units (GPUs).
  • State the purpose of the white paper: to analyze the RTX 3060 (or a comparable GPU) from a sustainability perspective.
  • Briefly introduce the RTX 3060 and its key features.
  • Outline the scope of the paper (e.g., manufacturing, use phase, end-of-life).

2. Literature Review:

  • Review existing literature on sustainable technology in the semiconductor industry.
  • Discuss the environmental impact of GPU manufacturing (e.g., resource consumption, energy use, waste generation).
  • Explore the role of energy efficiency in GPU sustainability.
  • Examine the challenges and opportunities related to e-waste management for GPUs.
  • Discuss relevant sustainability metrics and frameworks.

3. Methodology:

  • Describe the methods used for data collection and analysis. This is crucial. How will you measure sustainability?
  • Identify the data sources (e.g., manufacturer specifications, industry reports, life cycle assessments, independent reviews, academic databases).
  • Explain how the data will be analyzed and interpreted. Will you use specific metrics?
  • Acknowledge any limitations of the methodology.

4. Case Study: RTX 3060 (or similar GPU) and Sustainability:

  • Manufacturing Phase:
    • Analyze the manufacturing process of the RTX 3060 (if data is available). NVIDIA and their partners may have some information.
    • Discuss the use of recycled materials, energy efficiency in manufacturing facilities, and waste reduction efforts. This will likely be limited by publicly available data.
    • Compare the 3060’s manufacturing footprint to previous generations or competitor products (if data allows).
  • Use Phase:
    • Evaluate the energy efficiency of the RTX 3060 (performance per watt). Compare it to similar cards.
    • Analyze the impact of features like NVIDIA DLSS on energy consumption. You could try to find benchmarks that compare performance and power draw with and without DLSS.
    • Discuss the role of software optimization and driver updates in improving energy efficiency.
  • End-of-Life Phase:
    • Examine the recyclability of the RTX 3060 and its components.
    • Discuss the potential for reuse or repurposing.
    • Analyze the environmental impact of improper disposal (e-waste).
    • Investigate any take-back programs or recycling initiatives offered by NVIDIA or its partners.

5. Discussion:

  • Synthesize the findings from the case study.
  • Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the RTX 3060 from a sustainability perspective.
  • Compare the RTX 3060’s sustainability performance to other GPUs (if data is available).
  • Analyze the trade-offs between performance and sustainability.

6. Recommendations:

  • Offer recommendations for manufacturers to improve the sustainability of GPUs.
  • Provide guidance for consumers on how to make more sustainable choices when purchasing and using GPUs.
  • Suggest areas for future research on GPU sustainability.

7. Conclusion:

  • Summarize the key findings and reiterate the importance of sustainable technology in the GPU industry.

8. References: (Use a consistent citation style)

9. Appendices (Optional): Include any supporting data, tables, or figures.

Key Research Areas:

  • NVIDIA’s website and sustainability reports.
  • Industry reports on semiconductor manufacturing and e-waste.
  • Academic databases (IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, etc.).
  • Life cycle assessment (LCA) databases (if you want to attempt a simplified LCA).
  • Benchmarks and reviews of the RTX 3060 and comparable GPUs (for power consumption data).

Remember: A white paper needs to be objective and supported by evidence. Focus on data and analysis rather than opinion. Be realistic about the limitations of publicly available information. This outline should provide a solid starting point for your research.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3060 ?

While the RTX 3060 is primarily marketed for gaming, its underlying technologies and capabilities can be applied to various industrial settings, contributing to sustainability in those areas:

1. AI and Machine Learning for Optimization:

  • Process Optimization: The 3060’s processing power can be used to run AI algorithms that optimize industrial processes, such as manufacturing, logistics, and energy management. This can lead to reduced resource consumption, waste, and energy usage.
  • Predictive Maintenance: AI models running on the 3060 can analyze sensor data from industrial equipment to predict failures and schedule maintenance proactively. This reduces downtime, extends equipment lifespan, and prevents resource-intensive emergency repairs.
  • Resource Management: In sectors like agriculture or mining, the 3060 can help process data from drones or sensors to optimize resource allocation, such as water usage in irrigation or mineral extraction.

2. Simulation and Design:

  • Product Design: The 3060’s graphics capabilities can be used for simulations and visualizations in product design, allowing engineers to optimize designs for material usage, energy efficiency, and recyclability before physical prototypes are even built.
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD): In industries like aerospace or automotive, the 3060 can accelerate CFD simulations, helping engineers design more aerodynamic and fuel-efficient vehicles or optimize airflow in industrial processes.
  • Building Design: Architects and engineers can use the 3060 for building simulations to optimize energy usage, lighting, and ventilation, leading to more sustainable buildings.

3. Data Visualization and Analysis:

  • Environmental Monitoring: The 3060 can be used to visualize and analyze large datasets from environmental sensors, helping researchers and policymakers understand climate patterns, pollution levels, and resource availability.
  • Urban Planning: Urban planners can use the 3060 to visualize and analyze data related to traffic flow, energy consumption, and waste management, enabling them to develop more sustainable urban development strategies.

4. Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR) for Training and Collaboration:

  • Virtual Training: VR training programs powered by the 3060 can simulate real-world industrial scenarios, allowing workers to practice complex tasks without the risk of accidents or resource waste.
  • Remote Collaboration: AR applications can facilitate remote collaboration between experts and technicians, reducing the need for travel and minimizing the carbon footprint associated with site visits.

Important Considerations:

  • Cost-effectiveness: While the 3060 offers good performance, its suitability for industrial applications depends on the specific needs and budget of the organization. Other GPUs or specialized hardware might be more appropriate in some cases.
  • Software and Integration: The 3060’s capabilities need to be integrated with appropriate software and systems to be effectively utilized in industrial settings.
  • Long-term Support: Industrial applications often require long-term support and reliability. Organizations need to consider the lifecycle of the hardware and the availability of support services.

While the RTX 3060 might not be the first choice for extremely demanding industrial workloads, its combination of performance, features, and relatively affordable price point makes it a viable option for certain applications, particularly in AI, simulation, and visualization. Its use in these areas can contribute to improved efficiency, reduced waste, and more sustainable practices across various industries.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3060 ?

You’re thinking ahead, and that’s great! Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology in GPUs like the RTX 3060 is an ongoing process. Here are some key areas of focus:

1. Advanced Materials:

  • Exploring alternatives to traditional silicon: Researchers are investigating new semiconductor materials with improved energy efficiency and potentially lower environmental impact. This could involve materials like gallium nitride (GaN) or silicon carbide (SiC).
  • Developing more sustainable materials for other components: This includes finding alternatives to certain plastics, metals, and other materials used in the card’s construction, focusing on recyclability and reduced environmental impact.

2. Architectural Innovations:

  • Further improving energy efficiency: Researchers are constantly working on new GPU architectures that can deliver even more performance per watt. This involves optimizing data flow, reducing power leakage, and developing more efficient processing units.
  • Specialized hardware for AI: As AI becomes more prevalent, GPUs are being designed with specialized hardware (like Tensor Cores in NVIDIA GPUs) to accelerate AI tasks. This can improve efficiency for AI applications, reducing overall energy consumption.

3. Manufacturing Process Improvements:

  • Reducing resource consumption: R&D efforts are focused on minimizing the use of raw materials, water, and energy in the manufacturing of GPUs. This includes optimizing production processes and improving material utilization.
  • Developing closed-loop recycling systems: Researchers are exploring ways to create closed-loop systems where materials from old GPUs can be efficiently recovered and reused in new products.
  • Minimizing the use of hazardous chemicals: The semiconductor industry is working to reduce the use of harmful chemicals in manufacturing processes and find safer alternatives.

4. Software and Algorithms:

  • Optimizing software for energy efficiency: Software developers are working on algorithms and techniques to optimize GPU usage and minimize power consumption. This includes things like dynamic power management and workload optimization.
  • AI-powered energy management: AI can be used to dynamically adjust GPU settings based on workload demands, further improving energy efficiency.

5. Life Cycle Assessment and Design for Environment:

  • Developing standardized metrics: Researchers are working on developing standardized metrics to assess the environmental impact of GPUs throughout their life cycle, from manufacturing to disposal.
  • Designing for disassembly and recycling: GPUs can be designed with easier disassembly and recycling in mind, making it easier to recover valuable materials and reduce e-waste.

Collaboration and Open Innovation:

  • Industry partnerships: Collaboration between GPU manufacturers, research institutions, and other stakeholders is crucial for accelerating the development of sustainable technology.
  • Open-source initiatives: Open-source projects and initiatives can foster innovation and accelerate the adoption of sustainable practices in the GPU industry.

It’s important to remember that R&D in sustainable technology is a continuous process. By investing in research and innovation, the GPU industry can move towards more environmentally friendly products and contribute to a more sustainable future for technology as a whole.

COURTESY : RBC

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »