Sustainable Technology of 3050

Sustainable Technology of 3050 ?

It’s exciting to think about the future of sustainable technology in 3050! While we can’t predict the future with certainty, we can explore some potential trends and possibilities based on current advancements:

1. Advanced Renewable Energy:

• Fusion Power: If breakthroughs in nuclear fusion occur, it could become a primary energy source, providing clean and abundant power.
• Space-Based Solar: Solar energy collected in space and beamed down to Earth could provide a continuous and efficient energy supply.  
• Enhanced Geothermal: Deeper and more efficient geothermal energy extraction could tap into the Earth’s vast heat resources.  

2. Carbon Capture and Utilization:

• Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Technologies that directly remove carbon dioxide from the air could become highly efficient and widely deployed.
• Carbon Transformation: Captured carbon could be used to create fuels, materials, and other valuable products, closing the carbon loop.

3. Sustainable Materials and Manufacturing:

• Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to create materials could lead to sustainable and biodegradable alternatives to plastics and other conventional materials.
• Circular Economy: Manufacturing processes could be designed to minimize waste and maximize resource reuse, creating a circular economy.  
• Self-Healing Materials: Materials that can repair themselves could extend the lifespan of products and reduce waste.  

4. Smart and Efficient Systems:

• AI-Powered Optimization: Artificial intelligence could optimize energy use in buildings, transportation systems, and industrial processes.  
• Smart Grids: Advanced energy grids could efficiently distribute renewable energy and minimize waste.  
• Precision Agriculture: Technologies that optimize resource use in agriculture could increase food production while reducing environmental impact.  

5. Biotechnology and Environmental Restoration:

• Bioremediation: Using microorganisms to clean up pollution and restore ecosystems could become more sophisticated and widely used.
• Genetic Engineering: Advances in genetic engineering could help create crops that are more resilient to climate change and require fewer resources.  

6. Space Technologies for Sustainability:

• Earth Observation: Satellites and other space-based technologies could provide crucial data for monitoring environmental changes and managing resources.
• Resource Extraction: Mining asteroids or other celestial bodies could provide access to resources needed for sustainable technologies on Earth.  

Important Considerations:

• Interconnectedness: These technologies will likely be interconnected and work together to create a sustainable future.
• Social and Ethical Implications: It’s crucial to consider the social and ethical implications of these technologies and ensure they are used responsibly.
• Global Collaboration: Addressing climate change and achieving sustainability will require global cooperation and collaboration.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential future of sustainable technology. The actual developments may be different, but the pursuit of sustainability will undoubtedly drive innovation and lead to remarkable advancements.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 3050 ?

While it’s impossible to definitively say what sustainable technology will look like in 3050, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential breakthroughs. Here are some possibilities:

1. Energy:

• Fusion Power: If scientists achieve a breakthrough in nuclear fusion, it could become a primary energy source, providing clean, safe, and virtually limitless power.  
• Space-Based Solar: Solar energy collected in space and beamed down to Earth could provide a continuous and highly efficient energy supply.  
• Advanced Geothermal: Enhanced geothermal systems could tap into the Earth’s vast heat resources, providing a stable and renewable energy source.  

2. Carbon Management:

• Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Technologies that directly remove carbon dioxide from the air could become highly efficient and widely deployed, helping to reverse climate change.  
• Carbon Transformation: Captured carbon could be used to create fuels, materials, and other valuable products, effectively closing the carbon loop.  

3. Materials and Manufacturing:

• Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to create materials could lead to sustainable and biodegradable alternatives to plastics and other conventional materials.
• Circular Economy: Manufacturing processes could be designed to minimize waste and maximize resource reuse, creating a closed-loop system.  
• Self-Healing Materials: Materials that can repair themselves could extend the lifespan of products and reduce waste.  

4. Smart Systems:

• AI-Powered Optimization: Artificial intelligence could optimize energy use in buildings, transportation systems, and industrial processes, leading to significant efficiency gains.  
• Smart Grids: Advanced energy grids could efficiently distribute renewable energy and minimize waste.  
• Precision Agriculture: Technologies that optimize resource use in agriculture could increase food production while reducing environmental impact.  

5. Biotechnology:

• Bioremediation: Using microorganisms to clean up pollution and restore ecosystems could become more sophisticated and widely used.  
• Genetic Engineering: Advances in genetic engineering could help create crops that are more resilient to climate change and require fewer resources.  

6. Space Technologies:

• Earth Observation: Satellites and other space-based technologies could provide crucial data for monitoring environmental changes and managing resources.
• Resource Extraction: Mining asteroids or other celestial bodies could provide access to resources needed for sustainable technologies on Earth.  

Important Considerations:

• Interconnectedness: These technologies will likely be interconnected and work together to create a sustainable future.
• Social and Ethical Implications: It’s crucial to consider the social and ethical implications of these technologies and ensure they are used responsibly.
• Global Collaboration: Addressing climate change and achieving sustainability will require global cooperation and collaboration.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential future of sustainable technology. The actual developments may be different, but the pursuit of sustainability will undoubtedly drive innovation and lead to remarkable advancements.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3050 ?

Sustainable technology in 3050 will be essential for everyone on the planet. Here’s why:

• Combating Climate Change: By 3050, the effects of climate change will likely be even more pronounced. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for mitigating these effects, such as by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, developing climate-resilient infrastructure, and managing natural resources.
• Resource Scarcity: As the global population grows and resources become more scarce, sustainable technologies will be needed to ensure access to essential resources like water, food, and energy. These technologies can help improve efficiency, reduce waste, and promote circular economies.
• Environmental Protection: Sustainable technologies will play a vital role in protecting ecosystems and biodiversity. They can help reduce pollution, restore degraded environments, and prevent further environmental damage.  
• Economic Development: Sustainable technologies can drive economic growth by creating new industries, jobs, and markets. They can also help reduce costs and improve efficiency in existing industries.  
• Social Equity: Sustainable technologies can contribute to social equity by ensuring access to essential services like clean water, sanitation, and healthcare. They can also help reduce poverty and inequality by creating economic opportunities and promoting sustainable development.  

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 3050 will be necessary for creating a healthy, prosperous, and equitable future for all. It will require a collective effort from individuals, businesses, governments, and researchers to develop and implement these technologies.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3050 ?

You’re right to think about the timing! It’s not just about having sustainable technology in 3050, but when we need it. Here’s a breakdown:

• Now: We need sustainable technology now. The effects of climate change are already being felt, and we need to act urgently to reduce emissions and transition to a more sustainable way of life. Every year we delay, the challenges become greater.  
• In the near future (next few decades): We need to rapidly develop and deploy sustainable technologies to meet our growing energy needs, reduce our environmental impact, and adapt to the changing climate. This includes investing in renewable energy, improving energy efficiency, and developing sustainable solutions for transportation, agriculture, and industry.  
• By 2050: Many experts believe we need to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. This will require widespread adoption of sustainable technologies across all sectors of the economy.  
• In 3050 and beyond: Sustainable technologies will be essential for maintaining a healthy planet and a thriving society in the long term. They will help us manage resources sustainably, protect ecosystems, and ensure a good quality of life for future generations.

It’s not about waiting for 3050. The need for sustainable technology is critical now and will only become more urgent in the years to come. The investments and innovations we make today will determine the kind of future we have.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3050 ?

That’s a great question that gets at the heart of how we need to think about sustainable technology! It’s not just about having it somewhere in 3050, but where it needs to be integrated to make a difference. Here’s a breakdown:

• Everywhere! Sustainable technology needs to be woven into the fabric of our lives and infrastructure. This means:
  • Homes and Buildings: Energy-efficient appliances, smart home systems, green building materials, and renewable energy generation.
  • Transportation: Electric vehicles, public transportation powered by renewable energy, sustainable aviation fuels, and efficient transportation networks.  
  • Cities: Smart city technologies that optimize resource use, reduce pollution, and improve quality of life.  
  • Industries: Sustainable manufacturing processes, circular economy models, and carbon capture and utilization technologies.
  • Agriculture: Precision agriculture, sustainable farming practices, and alternative protein sources.
  • Energy Systems: Smart grids, energy storage solutions, and widespread integration of renewable energy sources.
  • Water Systems: Water-efficient technologies, wastewater treatment and reuse systems, and desalination plants powered by renewable energy.
  • Communication and Information Technology: Energy-efficient data centers, sustainable electronics, and responsible use of AI.
• Especially in vulnerable regions: Climate change disproportionately affects vulnerable communities. Sustainable technologies are crucial for:
  • Disaster preparedness and resilience: Early warning systems, climate-resilient infrastructure, and access to essential resources.
  • Adaptation to climate change: Developing drought-resistant crops, managing water resources, and protecting coastal communities.
  • Economic development: Creating sustainable livelihoods and promoting economic diversification in vulnerable regions.
• Globally: Climate change is a global problem that requires global solutions. Sustainable technologies need to be shared and implemented worldwide, with international cooperation and knowledge sharing.  

In essence, sustainable technology in 3050 needs to be ubiquitous. It needs to be integrated into every aspect of our lives, from the smallest devices to the largest infrastructure projects. It needs to be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or economic status. And it needs to be implemented in a way that promotes both environmental sustainability and social equity.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3050 ?

That’s the million-dollar question! How do we actually achieve sustainable technology by 3050? It’s a complex challenge, but here are some key approaches:

1. Research and Development:

• Fundamental Research: Continued investment in basic scientific research is crucial for discovering new materials, processes, and technologies. This includes exploring areas like advanced energy generation (fusion, space-based solar), carbon capture and utilization, and bio-based materials.
• Applied Research and Development: Translating scientific discoveries into practical technologies requires focused engineering and development efforts. This involves building prototypes, testing their performance, and scaling up production.
• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Sustainable technology development requires collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, social scientists, and policymakers. This ensures that technologies are not only technically sound but also socially acceptable and economically viable.

2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship:

• Supporting Startups: Creating an environment that fosters innovation and entrepreneurship is essential. This includes providing funding, mentorship, and resources to startups developing sustainable technologies.  
• Incentivizing Innovation: Governments can play a role by providing incentives for research and development, such as tax breaks, grants, and prizes.  
• Open Innovation: Encouraging collaboration between companies, research institutions, and individuals can accelerate the development and diffusion of sustainable technologies.  

3. Policy and Regulation:

• Setting Standards: Governments can set standards for energy efficiency, emissions, and resource use to drive the adoption of sustainable technologies.  
• Carbon Pricing: Implementing carbon pricing mechanisms, such as carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems, can make polluting technologies more expensive and incentivize the use of cleaner alternatives.  
• Investing in Infrastructure: Governments need to invest in sustainable infrastructure, such as renewable energy grids, public transportation systems, and charging stations for electric vehicles.  

4. Education and Awareness:

• STEM Education: Investing in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is crucial for developing the workforce needed to create and implement sustainable technologies.  
• Public Awareness: Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technologies can drive consumer demand and support for policy changes.  

5. Global Collaboration:

• International Cooperation: Addressing climate change and achieving sustainability requires global cooperation. This includes sharing knowledge, technology, and resources, as well as coordinating policies and regulations.  
• Technology Transfer: Facilitating the transfer of sustainable technologies from developed to developing countries is essential for ensuring equitable access to clean energy and other sustainable solutions.

6. Sustainable Consumption and Production:

• Circular Economy: Transitioning to a circular economy model that minimizes waste and maximizes resource reuse is crucial for reducing environmental impact.  
• Sustainable Lifestyles: Encouraging sustainable consumption patterns, such as reducing energy use, eating less meat, and buying eco-friendly products, can contribute to a more sustainable future.  

Achieving sustainable technology by 3050 will require a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including governments, businesses, researchers, and individuals. It’s a challenging but achievable goal that will ensure a better future for all.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3050 ?

It’s tough to do a real case study of sustainable technology in 3050, since, well, we’re not there yet! But, we can create a hypothetical case study based on the trends and possibilities we’ve discussed. This helps illustrate what it might look like in practice.

Case Study: The City of Aurora, 3050

Background: Aurora is a mid-sized coastal city, once heavily reliant on fossil fuels. By 3050, it has transformed into a model of urban sustainability.

Key Sustainable Technologies in Use:

• Energy:
  • Fusion Power Plant: Aurora is primarily powered by a regional fusion power plant, providing clean and abundant energy.
  • Distributed Solar: Rooftops and building facades are covered in advanced, highly efficient solar panels, supplementing the fusion plant and providing resilience.
  • Smart Grid: An AI-powered smart grid optimizes energy distribution, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.  
• Transportation:
  • Electric Vehicle Fleet: The city is almost entirely electric vehicle-based, with a comprehensive network of charging stations powered by renewable energy.
  • Hyperloop Network: High-speed hyperloop trains connect Aurora to other cities, reducing travel times and emissions.
  • Green Public Transportation: The city has an extensive network of electric buses and light rail, powered by renewable energy.
• Buildings and Infrastructure:
  • Green Buildings: All new buildings are constructed using sustainable materials and incorporate energy-efficient designs, including passive heating and cooling.
  • Vertical Farms: Integrated vertical farms within buildings and throughout the city provide fresh, locally grown produce, reducing transportation needs and land use.
  • Water Management: Advanced water recycling and purification systems ensure efficient water use and minimize waste.  
• Industry and Manufacturing:
  • Circular Economy Hub: Aurora is a hub for circular economy industries, where materials are constantly reused and recycled, minimizing waste and pollution.
  • Biomanufacturing: Local biomanufacturing facilities produce sustainable materials and products using biological processes.
• Environmental Management:
  • Coastal Protection: Advanced sea walls and restored coastal ecosystems protect the city from rising sea levels and storm surges.
  • Air Purification: Atmospheric carbon capture technologies help to remove pollutants from the air, improving air quality.

Outcomes:

• Zero Carbon Emissions: Aurora has achieved net-zero carbon emissions, contributing to the fight against climate change.
• Resource Efficiency: The city uses resources efficiently, minimizing waste and maximizing reuse.
• High Quality of Life: Residents enjoy clean air and water, access to green spaces, and a thriving economy.
• Resilience: Aurora is resilient to the impacts of climate change, such as rising sea levels and extreme weather events.

Challenges:

• Initial Investment: The transition to sustainable technologies required significant upfront investment.
• Technological Development: Continuous research and development were needed to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of sustainable technologies.
• Social Acceptance: Public awareness campaigns and education were crucial for gaining public support for sustainable policies and technologies.

Lessons Learned:

• Long-term Vision: A long-term vision and commitment to sustainability are essential for achieving transformative change.
• Innovation and Collaboration: Innovation and collaboration among governments, businesses, and researchers are crucial for developing and implementing sustainable technologies.
• Public Engagement: Engaging the public and building support for sustainable policies are essential for success.

This hypothetical case study illustrates the potential of sustainable technology to transform cities and create a more sustainable future. While it’s just a glimpse into the future, it highlights the importance of investing in sustainable technologies today to make this vision a reality.Sources and related content

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3050 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3050: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Executive Summary:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in 3050, a future shaped by the urgent need to address climate change, resource scarcity, and growing populations. It posits that by 3050, a confluence of technological advancements, societal shifts, and global cooperation will have ushered in an era where sustainability is not just an aspiration, but a fundamental principle underpinning human civilization. This paper outlines potential key technological areas, societal implications, and recommendations for achieving this vision.

1. Introduction:

The imperative for sustainable practices has never been greater. Climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation demand a radical shift in how we generate energy, produce goods, and interact with the planet. This paper envisions a future where sustainable technologies are not merely add-ons but are deeply integrated into every facet of human life, from energy production and consumption to materials science, agriculture, and urban planning.

2. Key Technological Areas:

• 2.1. Energy:
  • Fusion Energy: Nuclear fusion, if realized, could provide a near-limitless source of clean energy, powering cities and industries without greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Advanced Solar and Space-Based Solar: Highly efficient photovoltaic materials and space-based solar farms could capture solar energy on a massive scale, providing a continuous and reliable energy supply.
  • Enhanced Geothermal: Deep geothermal energy extraction could tap into the Earth’s vast heat reserves, providing a stable and baseload renewable energy source.
• 2.2. Carbon Management:
  • Direct Air Capture (DAC): Large-scale DAC technologies could remove CO2 directly from the atmosphere, helping to reverse climate change.
  • Carbon Mineralization: Accelerated carbon mineralization processes could permanently store captured CO2 in geological formations.
  • Carbon-Negative Fuels: Developing fuels from captured CO2 and renewable energy could create a closed-loop carbon cycle.
• 2.3. Materials and Manufacturing:
  • Biomanufacturing: Using biological systems to produce materials could lead to sustainable and biodegradable alternatives to plastics and other polluting materials.
  • Circular Economy Models: Manufacturing processes designed for closed-loop systems, where materials are constantly reused and recycled, could minimize waste and resource depletion.
  • Self-Healing Materials: Materials capable of self-repair could extend product lifespans and reduce waste.
• 2.4. Smart Systems and AI:
  • AI-Driven Optimization: Artificial intelligence could optimize energy consumption in buildings, transportation systems, and industrial processes, leading to significant efficiency gains.
  • Smart Grids: Advanced energy grids could dynamically balance energy supply and demand, maximizing the use of renewable energy sources.
  • Precision Agriculture: AI-powered precision agriculture could optimize resource use in farming, increasing yields while reducing environmental impact.
• 2.5. Biotechnology and Environmental Restoration:
  • Bioremediation: Using microorganisms to clean up pollution and restore ecosystems could become a powerful tool for environmental remediation.
  • Synthetic Biology: Advances in synthetic biology could enable the development of microorganisms that can produce biofuels, bioplastics, and other valuable products.
• 2.6. Space Technologies:
  • Earth Observation: Advanced satellite technologies could provide real-time data on environmental changes, enabling better monitoring and management of resources.
  • Asteroid Mining: Mining asteroids for resources could provide access to rare earth minerals and other materials needed for sustainable technologies.

3. Societal Implications:

• Economic Transformation: The transition to a sustainable economy could create new industries, jobs, and markets, while also requiring a shift away from traditional fossil fuel-based industries.
• Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and resources will be crucial for addressing social inequalities.
• Behavioral Changes: Sustainable practices will require changes in consumer behavior and lifestyles, such as reducing consumption, adopting circular economy principles, and embracing sustainable transportation options.
• Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require unprecedented levels of international cooperation.

4. Recommendations:

• Invest in R&D: Significant and sustained investment in research and development of sustainable technologies is essential.
• Foster Innovation: Creating an environment that supports innovation and entrepreneurship in the sustainable technology sector is crucial.
• Develop Policy Frameworks: Governments need to develop supportive policies and regulations that incentivize the adoption of sustainable technologies.
• Promote Education and Awareness: Educating the public about the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technologies is essential for driving behavioral change.
• Encourage Global Collaboration: International cooperation on research, technology transfer, and policy development is crucial for addressing global sustainability challenges.

5. Conclusion:

The vision of a sustainable future in 3050 is not just a dream, but a necessity. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and committing to a sustainable path, we can create a world where both humanity and the planet thrive. The journey towards 2050 and beyond requires immediate and sustained action, but the potential rewards – a healthy planet, a thriving economy, and a just society – are immeasurable.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3050 ?

You’re thinking ahead! It’s fascinating to imagine how sustainable technology might revolutionize industries in 3050. Here are some potential applications:

1. Manufacturing:

• Circular Economy: Imagine factories where every material is tracked and reused endlessly. AI-powered systems could manage complex recycling and repurposing processes, minimizing waste to near zero.  
• Biomanufacturing: Instead of traditional factories, we might see facilities where living organisms produce materials. Imagine bio-engineered microbes creating plastics, fabrics, or even construction materials, all biodegradable and renewable.
• Personalized Production: 3D printing could evolve to create highly customized products on demand, minimizing overproduction and transportation needs. You might order a new phone, and it’s “grown” in your home using bio-based materials.  

2. Energy:

• Fusion-Powered Industries: Industries that require vast amounts of energy, like aluminum production or steel manufacturing, could be powered by clean fusion energy, dramatically reducing their carbon footprint.
• Smart Energy Management: AI could optimize energy use in factories in real-time, predicting demand and adjusting production schedules to minimize waste and maximize efficiency.  
• Decentralized Energy: Factories might generate much of their own energy through on-site solar, geothermal, or even small-scale fusion reactors, making them more resilient and independent.

3. Agriculture:

• Vertical Farms: Imagine massive, automated vertical farms in urban areas, producing fresh food year-round with minimal land and water use. AI could monitor and optimize growing conditions, ensuring high yields and reducing the need for pesticides.  
• Precision Agriculture: Drones, sensors, and AI could be used to monitor crops and soil conditions in real-time, allowing farmers to target resources precisely where they’re needed, reducing waste and environmental impact.  
• Alternative Proteins: Biomanufacturing could be used to create sustainable and nutritious protein sources, reducing our reliance on animal agriculture and its associated environmental impacts.  

4. Transportation:

• Sustainable Aviation: Imagine airplanes powered by biofuels or even hydrogen, dramatically reducing the environmental impact of air travel.
• Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles could optimize traffic flow and reduce fuel consumption, making transportation more efficient and sustainable.  
• Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop trains could connect cities and regions, reducing travel times and emissions compared to traditional transportation methods.  

5. Resource Management:

• Advanced Recycling: Imagine recycling plants that can separate materials at the molecular level, allowing for the complete reuse of almost any material.
• Water Purification: Advanced filtration and desalination technologies, powered by renewable energy, could provide access to clean water for industries and communities in even the most arid regions.
• Environmental Remediation: Bioremediation technologies could be used to clean up pollution and restore degraded ecosystems, helping to heal the planet.

Important Considerations:

• Automation and Jobs: As industries become more automated, it will be crucial to address the potential impact on employment and ensure a just transition for workers.
• Ethical Considerations: As with any technology, it’s important to consider the ethical implications of sustainable technologies and ensure they are used responsibly.
• Accessibility: It’s crucial to ensure that sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or economic status.

The industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3050 are vast and full of potential. By embracing these technologies, we can create a future where industries are not only efficient and productive, but also environmentally responsible and contribute to a thriving planet.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3050 ?

You’re asking about the really big picture! Research and development for sustainable technology in 2050 and beyond is a long-term endeavor that requires a multi-faceted approach. Here’s how we might get there:  

1. Foundational Scientific Research:

• Materials Science: Discovering new materials with exceptional properties is crucial. This includes:
  • Superconductors for lossless energy transmission  
  • Advanced photovoltaics for ultra-efficient solar panels  
  • Lightweight, strong, and biodegradable materials for construction and manufacturing
  • Materials for advanced energy storage (batteries, fuel cells)  
• Energy Generation:
  • Continued research on fusion energy to achieve a viable and scalable reactor
  • Exploring novel energy generation methods, like harnessing zero-point energy or other untapped sources
• Artificial Intelligence:
  • Developing AI algorithms for optimizing complex systems (smart grids, transportation networks, resource management)
  • Creating AI that can accelerate scientific discovery and materials design  
• Biotechnology:
  • Advancing synthetic biology to engineer microorganisms for biomanufacturing and bioremediation
  • Researching genetic engineering for climate-resilient crops and sustainable agriculture  

2. Engineering and Technology Development:

• Translating Discoveries: Taking scientific breakthroughs and turning them into real-world technologies. This involves:
  • Designing and building prototypes
  • Testing and refining performance
  • Scaling up production processes
• Systems Integration:
  • Developing smart grids that can integrate diverse renewable energy sources
  • Creating circular economy systems that minimize waste and maximize resource reuse  
  • Designing sustainable urban infrastructure and transportation networks  

3. Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration:

• Bringing Experts Together: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, social scientists, and policymakers. This ensures that:
  • Technologies are not only technically sound but also socially acceptable and economically viable
  • Ethical considerations are addressed from the outset
• Knowledge Sharing:
  • Open-source research and data sharing to accelerate progress
  • International collaboration to tackle global challenges

4. Long-Term Vision and Funding:

• Government Support:
  • Consistent and substantial funding for basic scientific research
  • Incentives for private sector investment in sustainable technology development
  • Policies that support the adoption of sustainable technologies
• Private Sector Investment:
  • Companies investing in R&D for sustainable solutions
  • Venture capital funding for startups developing innovative technologies
• Global Initiatives:
  • International partnerships to address climate change and other global challenges  
  • Sharing knowledge, technology, and resources

5. Education and Workforce Development:

• STEM Education:
  • Investing in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education at all levels
  • Training the next generation of scientists, engineers, and innovators
• Lifelong Learning:
  • Providing opportunities for people to learn new skills and adapt to the changing economy

Important Considerations:

• Ethical Implications: As we develop powerful new technologies, it’s crucial to consider their ethical implications and ensure they are used responsibly.
• Social Equity: Sustainable technologies should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or economic status.  
• Environmental Impact: It’s important to assess the full life-cycle environmental impact of new technologies, from resource extraction to manufacturing to disposal.

Research and development for sustainable technology in 2050 and beyond is an ongoing process. It requires a long-term vision, sustained investment, and collaboration across disciplines and sectors. By focusing on these key areas, we can pave the way for a future where technology and sustainability go hand in hand.Sources and related content

courtesy : Voith Group

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.