Sustainable Technology of 2930

Sustainable Technology of 2930 ?

It’s impossible to predict the exact state of sustainable technology in 2930. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments:

Possible Trends:

• Highly Advanced Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable energy sources could be incredibly efficient and integrated into everyday life. Imagine solar panels on every surface, wind turbines in urban areas, and geothermal plants powering entire cities.
• Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies that minimize waste and pollution could be commonplace. This could include advanced recycling systems, biodegradable materials, and industrial processes that reuse all byproducts.
• Precision Agriculture: Technologies that optimize resource use in agriculture could be widespread. This could include sensors, AI, and robotics that help farmers use water, fertilizer, and pesticides more efficiently.
• Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, high-speed trains, and other forms of sustainable transportation could be the norm. Advanced battery technology, charging infrastructure, and smart traffic management systems could make transportation more efficient and less polluting.
• Smart Cities: Cities could be designed with sustainability in mind. This could include energy-efficient buildings, green spaces, and public transportation systems. Smart technologies could help manage resources and optimize city operations.

Challenges:

• Resource Availability: Even with advanced technology, some resources may become scarce. Finding sustainable alternatives and managing resource consumption will be crucial.
• Technological Development: Predicting the future of technology is difficult. Unexpected breakthroughs and challenges could shape the development of sustainable technologies.
• Social and Economic Factors: The adoption of sustainable technologies will depend on social and economic factors. Public awareness, government policies, and economic incentives will play a significant role.

Overall:

In 2930, sustainable technologies could be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. However, the specific technologies and their impact will depend on various factors, including resource availability, technological development, and social and economic conditions.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2930 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2930 is a fun thought experiment! While we can’t know for sure, here are some ideas based on current trends and potential future developments:

Energy:

• Ubiquitous Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable sources could be incredibly efficient and seamlessly integrated into our lives. Imagine solar panels on every surface, capturing energy even on cloudy days, and wind turbines silently generating power in urban areas.
• Advanced Energy Storage: We might have incredibly dense and efficient energy storage solutions, allowing us to store vast amounts of renewable energy and use it whenever needed. This could revolutionize transportation, making electric vehicles with incredible range a reality, and ensure a stable power supply even when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing.
• Fusion Power: If we manage to crack fusion, it could provide a clean, abundant, and virtually limitless source of energy.

Resource Management:

• Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies that minimize waste and pollution could be commonplace. This could include advanced recycling systems that can break down materials at a molecular level and reuse them endlessly, biodegradable materials that decompose naturally, and industrial processes that reuse all byproducts.
• Precision Agriculture: Technologies that optimize resource use in agriculture could be widespread. This could include sensors, AI, and robotics that help farmers use water, fertilizer, and pesticides more efficiently, reducing waste and environmental impact.  

Transportation:

• Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, high-speed trains, and other forms of sustainable transportation could be the norm. Advanced battery technology, charging infrastructure, and smart traffic management systems could make transportation more efficient and less polluting. We might even see personal air vehicles powered by clean energy.

Cities and Infrastructure:

• Smart Cities: Cities could be designed with sustainability in mind. This could include energy-efficient buildings that generate their own power, green spaces that help regulate temperature and improve air quality, and public transportation systems that are fast, efficient, and affordable. Smart technologies could help manage resources and optimize city operations, reducing waste and pollution.  

Other Possibilities:

• Biotechnology: Advances in biotechnology could lead to new materials that are biodegradable and self-healing, as well as new ways to produce food and other resources sustainably.
• Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology could be used to create incredibly strong and lightweight materials, as well as to develop new ways to clean up pollution and remediate environmental damage.  

Challenges:

• Resource Availability: Even with advanced technology, some resources may become scarce. Finding sustainable alternatives and managing resource consumption will be crucial.
• Technological Development: Predicting the future of technology is difficult. Unexpected breakthroughs and challenges could shape the development of sustainable technologies.
• Social and Economic Factors: The adoption of sustainable technologies will depend on social and economic factors. Public awareness, government policies, and economic incentives will play a significant role.

Overall:

In 2930, sustainable technologies could be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. However, the specific technologies and their impact will depend on various factors, including resource availability, technological development, and social and economic conditions.

It’s an exciting prospect to imagine a future where technology helps us live more sustainably and in harmony with the planet!Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2930 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 2930 will be essential for everyone. Here’s why:

• Resource Scarcity: Even with technological advancements, some resources might become scarce. Sustainable tech will be crucial for managing these limited resources efficiently and ensuring everyone has access to essential goods and services.
• Environmental Challenges: Climate change and other environmental issues will likely still be a concern. Sustainable technology will be vital for mitigating these challenges and creating a livable environment for all.
• Economic Sustainability: Sustainable technologies can create new industries and jobs, promoting economic growth while minimizing environmental impact. This will be important for ensuring a stable and prosperous future for everyone.  
• Social Equity: Sustainable technology can help address social inequalities by providing access to clean energy, clean water, and other essential resources for all members of society, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.  

In essence, sustainable technology in 2930 will be necessary for:

• Individuals: To live healthy and fulfilling lives with access to essential resources and a clean environment.
• Communities: To thrive and prosper in a sustainable way, with strong economies and social equity.
• Governments: To ensure the well-being of their citizens and the long-term stability of their nations.
• The planet: To maintain its ecological balance and support life for future generations.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 2930 will be a collective responsibility, requiring collaboration and innovation from individuals, communities, governments, and industries worldwide.Sources and related content

COURTESY: NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2930 ?

That’s a great question that gets to the heart of how we think about sustainable technology! It’s not just about having the tech, but where it’s needed and how it’s applied. Here’s a breakdown of where sustainable technology will be crucial in 2930 (and already is!):

Everywhere! But let’s get more specific:

• Homes and Buildings: Sustainable tech will be integrated into how we live and work. Think self-sufficient buildings with renewable energy, smart systems for energy management, and materials that are both durable and environmentally friendly.
• Cities: Urban areas will be redesigned with sustainability in mind. This means efficient public transport, green spaces, smart grids, and waste management systems that minimize pollution and resource use.
• Transportation: Sustainable tech will revolutionize how we move. Electric vehicles, high-speed trains, and perhaps even personal air vehicles powered by clean energy will be commonplace.  
• Agriculture: Farming will rely on precision agriculture, using technology to optimize resource use and reduce environmental impact. This could involve sensors, AI, and robotics to help farmers use water, fertilizer, and pesticides more efficiently.  
• Industry: Manufacturing and other industries will adopt closed-loop systems that minimize waste and pollution. This could involve advanced recycling systems, biodegradable materials, and industrial processes that reuse all byproducts.
• Energy Production: Renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal will be highly advanced and integrated into our infrastructure. We might even see fusion power becoming a reality.
• Resource Management: Sustainable tech will be crucial for managing resources like water and minerals. This could involve advanced recycling systems, desalination plants powered by renewable energy, and technologies that help us use resources more efficiently.
• Environmental Remediation: Technologies will be needed to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems. This could involve nanotechnology, biotechnology, and other innovative approaches.

Beyond physical locations:

• Global Collaboration: Sustainable technology will require international cooperation to address global challenges like climate change and resource depletion.
• Developing Nations: Access to sustainable technology will be crucial for developing nations to improve their economies and living standards without further harming the environment.
• Space: As we explore space, sustainable technologies will be essential for creating self-sustaining habitats and minimizing our impact on other planets.  

In essence:

Sustainable technology in 2930 will be required in every aspect of human life, from the smallest household to the vastness of space. It will be an integral part of how we live, work, travel, and interact with the planet.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2930 ?

You’re asking about the methods by which sustainable technology will be essential in 2930. It’s not just what and where, but how it will be integrated and utilized. Here’s how sustainable technology will be required in 2930:

1. Design and Engineering:

• Sustainable by Default: Products, infrastructure, and systems will be designed with sustainability as a core principle from the outset. This means considering the entire lifecycle of a product, from resource extraction to manufacturing, use, and disposal, to minimize environmental impact at every stage.  
• Biomimicry: We might see greater use of biomimicry, where designs are inspired by nature’s solutions. For example, buildings could be designed to regulate temperature like a termite mound, or materials could be developed that mimic the strength and flexibility of spider silk.
• Modular and Adaptable Systems: Infrastructure and technologies will be designed to be modular and adaptable, allowing them to be easily upgraded, repaired, or repurposed as needed. This will reduce waste and extend the lifespan of products and systems.  

2. Integration and Optimization:

• Smart Grids and Networks: Energy systems will be highly intelligent, using sensors, AI, and other technologies to optimize energy distribution and consumption. This will ensure that renewable energy sources are used efficiently and that energy is delivered where and when it’s needed most.  
• Circular Economy: Sustainable technology will enable a circular economy where resources are kept in use for as long as possible, extracting the maximum value from them whilst in use, then recovering and regenerating products and materials at the end of each service life. This will minimize waste and pollution.  
• Data-Driven Decisions: We’ll use data and analytics to make informed decisions about resource management, environmental protection, and sustainable development. This could involve using sensors to monitor pollution levels, tracking resource use in real-time, and using AI to analyze complex environmental data.

3. Innovation and Adaptation:

• Continuous Improvement: Sustainable technology will be constantly evolving, with ongoing research and development leading to new and improved solutions. This will require a culture of innovation and a commitment to continuous improvement.
• Adaptability: As environmental challenges and resource availability change, sustainable technologies will need to be adaptable. This means developing technologies that can be easily modified or repurposed to meet new needs.
• Resilience: Sustainable technology will help build more resilient systems that can withstand environmental shocks and stresses. This could involve developing infrastructure that can withstand extreme weather events, or creating agricultural systems that are more resistant to drought and pests.  

4. Collaboration and Education:

• Interdisciplinary Approach: Sustainable technology will require collaboration between experts from different fields, including engineers, scientists, designers, and social scientists.  
• Public Awareness: Educating the public about the importance of sustainability and the role of technology will be crucial for driving the adoption of sustainable solutions.
• Global Partnerships: Addressing global challenges like climate change will require international cooperation and the sharing of sustainable technologies across borders.  

In essence:

Sustainable technology in 2930 will be required not just as a set of tools and solutions, but as a way of thinking and a way of doing. It will be integrated into every aspect of how we design, build, operate, and interact with the world around us.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2930 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific case study for sustainable technology in 2930 because, well, it doesn’t exist yet! But, we can create a hypothetical case study based on the trends and possibilities we’ve discussed. This helps us imagine what it might look like in practice.

Case Study: The City of “Ecotopia” in 2930

Background: Ecotopia is a thriving city of 500,000 people, located in a region that was once heavily industrialized and environmentally degraded. Over centuries, it has transformed into a model of sustainability.

Key Sustainable Technologies in Use:

• Energy: Ecotopia is entirely powered by renewable energy. Solar panels are integrated into every building surface, capturing energy even on cloudy days. Wind turbines are strategically placed in and around the city, and geothermal plants tap into the earth’s heat. Advanced energy storage solutions ensure a stable power supply, even when renewable sources fluctuate.  
• Resource Management: Ecotopia operates on a closed-loop system. All waste is recycled or composted, and materials are designed to be durable, biodegradable, or endlessly reusable. Advanced sensors and AI monitor resource consumption in real-time, optimizing efficiency and preventing waste.  
• Transportation: Personal vehicles are rare in Ecotopia. Most residents rely on a network of high-speed electric trains and public transportation powered by clean energy. The city is designed to be walkable and bikeable, with green spaces and pedestrian-friendly streets.
• Agriculture: Ecotopia has a thriving urban agriculture system. Vertical farms and rooftop gardens provide fresh produce for residents, reducing the need for long-distance transportation and minimizing environmental impact. Precision agriculture techniques optimize resource use and minimize waste.  
• Buildings: Buildings in Ecotopia are designed to be energy-efficient and self-sufficient. They generate their own power, collect rainwater, and have green roofs that help regulate temperature and improve air quality.  

Outcomes:

• Environmental Restoration: Ecotopia has transformed a polluted and degraded environment into a thriving ecosystem. Air and water quality are excellent, and biodiversity has increased significantly.
• Resource Security: Ecotopia is not dependent on external sources for energy or resources. Its closed-loop system ensures that resources are used efficiently and that waste is minimized.
• Economic Prosperity: Ecotopia’s focus on sustainability has created new industries and jobs. The city is a hub for innovation in sustainable technology, attracting investment and talent from around the world.
• Social Equity: Ecotopia provides a high quality of life for all its residents. Everyone has access to clean energy, clean water, and other essential resources. The city is designed to promote social interaction and community building.  

Lessons Learned:

• Long-term vision: Ecotopia’s transformation took centuries of planning and effort. It demonstrates the importance of having a long-term vision for sustainability and making steady progress towards that vision.
• Technological innovation: Sustainable technology was crucial for Ecotopia’s success. Continuous innovation and adaptation were needed to overcome challenges and find new solutions.
• Collaboration: Ecotopia’s transformation required collaboration between governments, businesses, and individuals. Everyone had a role to play in building a sustainable future.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology could be integrated into all aspects of life in 2930, creating a thriving and resilient city. While it’s just a vision, it’s based on current trends and possibilities, and it can inspire us to work towards a more sustainable future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2930 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2930: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2930. While precise predictions are impossible, by extrapolating current trends, analyzing potential breakthroughs, and considering the imperative for long-term ecological balance, we can envision a future where technology plays a critical role in ensuring a thriving and sustainable civilization. This paper examines key areas of technological advancement, the challenges involved, and the societal shifts necessary to achieve this vision.

1. Introduction:

The 29th century will likely witness a world profoundly shaped by the choices we make today regarding sustainability. This paper posits that by 2930, sustainable technology will be deeply integrated into every facet of human life, driven by both necessity and a fundamental shift in societal values. The driving forces behind this transformation will include resource scarcity, climate change mitigation, and a growing understanding of the interconnectedness of human society and the natural world.

2. Key Technological Domains:

• 2.1 Energy: Renewable energy sources will be dominant. Solar energy harvesting will likely extend beyond traditional panels, with integration into building materials, infrastructure, and even clothing. Advanced energy storage solutions, potentially based on novel battery chemistries or other breakthrough technologies, will address intermittency challenges. Fusion power, if realized, could provide a clean and abundant energy source.
• 2.2 Resource Management: A circular economy, facilitated by advanced recycling and material science, will be the norm. Nanotechnology and biotechnology may enable the creation of biodegradable and self-healing materials. “Urban mining” of existing waste will become a significant source of valuable resources.
• 2.3 Food and Agriculture: Precision agriculture, utilizing AI, robotics, and advanced sensors, will optimize crop yields while minimizing resource input. Vertical farming and controlled-environment agriculture will be prevalent in urban centers, reducing transportation needs and increasing food security. Cultivated meat and other alternative protein sources may play a larger role in diets.
• 2.4 Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems will be ubiquitous. Electric vehicles, powered by high-capacity batteries and charged wirelessly, will be the primary mode of personal transport. Hyperloop-style high-speed transit systems may connect cities and regions. Advanced air traffic management systems will optimize airspace usage and reduce fuel consumption for air travel.
• 2.5 Built Environment: Buildings will be designed as self-sufficient ecosystems, generating their own energy, collecting and recycling water, and integrating with surrounding green spaces. Smart building management systems will optimize energy usage and resource allocation. “Living buildings” incorporating biological processes for air purification and waste treatment may become more common.
• 2.6 Information and Communication Technologies (ICT): Sustainable ICT will be crucial for managing complex systems and optimizing resource allocation. AI and machine learning will play a key role in analyzing data, predicting trends, and making informed decisions related to sustainability.

3. Societal Shifts:

Technological advancements alone are insufficient to achieve a sustainable future. Significant societal shifts will also be necessary:

• 3.1 Values and Ethics: A fundamental shift towards a more eco-centric worldview will be essential. Values emphasizing stewardship, intergenerational responsibility, and the intrinsic value of nature will need to become deeply ingrained in society.
• 3.2 Governance and Policy: Global cooperation and effective governance structures will be crucial for addressing transnational environmental challenges. Policies promoting sustainable practices and incentivizing technological innovation will be necessary.
• 3.3 Education and Awareness: Education systems will need to equip individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to live sustainably. Public awareness campaigns will play a crucial role in fostering a culture of sustainability.
• 3.4 Consumption Patterns: Shifting towards more sustainable consumption patterns will be essential. This may involve embracing circular economy principles, reducing material consumption, and prioritizing experiences over material possessions.

4. Challenges and Opportunities:

The transition to a sustainable future presents numerous challenges:

• 4.1 Technological Hurdles: Significant technological breakthroughs will be required in areas like energy storage, resource recycling, and carbon capture.
• 4.2 Economic and Social Disruption: The transition to a sustainable economy may lead to job displacement in certain sectors. Careful planning and social safety nets will be needed to mitigate these impacts.
• 4.3 Ethical Considerations: Emerging technologies like AI and genetic engineering raise ethical questions that must be carefully considered.

However, the transition also presents immense opportunities:

• 4.4 Innovation and Economic Growth: The development and deployment of sustainable technologies can drive innovation and create new economic opportunities.
• 4.5 Improved Quality of Life: A sustainable future can offer improved air and water quality, enhanced access to resources, and a more resilient and equitable society.

5. Conclusion:

While the precise nature of sustainable technology in 2930 remains uncertain, this white paper has outlined a plausible vision based on current trends and potential future developments. Achieving this vision will require a concerted effort from governments, businesses, researchers, and individuals. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and committing to a more sustainable way of life, we can create a future where both humanity and the planet thrive.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2930 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine how sustainable technology will revolutionize industries in 2930! Here are some potential applications, keeping in mind that this is speculative but based on current trends:

1. Manufacturing:

• Closed-loop Production: Imagine factories where almost no waste leaves the facility. Advanced recycling systems break down materials at a molecular level, feeding them back into the production process. Everything is designed for disassembly and reuse.  
• On-Demand Manufacturing: 3D printing and other additive manufacturing technologies could be highly advanced, allowing for on-demand production of goods. This minimizes overproduction and reduces the need for large-scale factories and long supply chains.  
• Sustainable Materials: Industries might rely heavily on bio-based materials, grown in sustainable bioreactors. These materials could be designed to be biodegradable or endlessly recyclable.
• AI-Powered Optimization: AI systems could monitor and optimize every step of the manufacturing process, from resource allocation to energy consumption, minimizing environmental impact.  

2. Energy:

• Renewable Energy Integration: Industries will likely be powered entirely by renewable energy sources, seamlessly integrated into their operations. Factories might have solar panels on every surface, wind turbines on-site, and access to geothermal energy.
• Energy-Efficient Processes: Industrial processes will be designed to be incredibly energy-efficient. Advanced materials and technologies will minimize energy loss and maximize the use of renewable energy sources.  
• Decentralized Energy Systems: Industries might have their own microgrids, generating and storing their own energy. This would make them more resilient and less dependent on centralized power plants.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

• Sustainable Mining: Mining operations could be automated and highly precise, minimizing environmental disruption. Advanced technologies might be used to extract resources from waste materials and previously inaccessible deposits.  
• Resource Regeneration: Technologies might exist to regenerate resources, such as rare earth minerals, from waste streams or even from the Earth’s crust.
• Water Management: Industries will likely have advanced water recycling and purification systems, minimizing their water footprint and ensuring access to clean water.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

• Vertical Farming: Large-scale vertical farms could be integrated into industrial areas, providing fresh produce for local populations. These farms would use minimal land and resources, and could be powered by renewable energy.
• Precision Agriculture: Industrial-scale agriculture will likely rely on precision agriculture techniques, using sensors, AI, and robotics to optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.
• Sustainable Food Processing: Food processing facilities will likely use closed-loop systems to minimize waste and recycle resources. New technologies might be used to create sustainable packaging and reduce food spoilage.

5. Construction and Infrastructure:

• Sustainable Building Materials: Buildings and infrastructure will be constructed using sustainable materials, such as bio-based composites and recycled materials.
• Self-Healing Infrastructure: Materials might be developed that can self-heal, reducing the need for repairs and extending the lifespan of infrastructure.  
• Modular Construction: Buildings and infrastructure could be designed to be modular, allowing them to be easily adapted or repurposed as needed.

Overall:

In 2930, industries will likely operate in a way that is not only economically viable but also environmentally responsible. Sustainable technology will be integrated into every aspect of industrial activity, from resource extraction to manufacturing to waste management. This will create a more circular and sustainable economy, where resources are used efficiently and the environmental impact of industry is minimized.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2930 ?

You’re asking a crucial question! Research and development (R&D) is the engine that will drive the sustainable technologies of 2930. Here’s a look at what that R&D might entail, keeping in mind this is a future-focused perspective:

1. Fundamental Scientific Research:

• New Materials: Scientists might be exploring novel materials with unique properties, like super-strength, self-healing, or biodegradability. This could involve nanotechnology, biomimicry (learning from nature), and advanced materials science.
• Energy Breakthroughs: Research could focus on harnessing new energy sources, like more efficient fusion power, or developing revolutionary energy storage solutions that go far beyond current battery technology.
• Understanding Complex Systems: Researchers might be studying Earth’s ecosystems in greater depth to understand how to live in better harmony with nature. This could involve advanced modeling and simulation of complex environmental systems.

2. Applied Research and Development:

• Advanced Recycling Technologies: Scientists might be developing technologies to break down materials at a molecular level, enabling near-perfect recycling and resource recovery.
• Precision Agriculture: R&D could focus on creating highly efficient agricultural systems that use minimal resources and have minimal environmental impact. This could involve advanced sensors, AI, and robotics.
• Sustainable Manufacturing: Researchers might be developing new industrial processes that are completely closed-loop, minimizing waste and pollution.
• Biotechnology: Scientists might be exploring how to use biotechnology to create sustainable materials, produce food more efficiently, and even clean up pollution.

3. Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration:

• Integrated Systems: R&D in sustainable technology will likely require collaboration between experts from many different fields, including materials scientists, engineers, biologists, computer scientists, and social scientists. ¹   1. What is Environmental Technology Research and Development? – Nerac, Inc. www.nerac.com
• Systems Thinking: Researchers will need to take a systems approach, considering the interconnectedness of different technologies and their impact on the environment and society as a whole.

4. Long-Term Vision:

• Future-Oriented Research: R&D in sustainable technology will require a long-term perspective, with researchers focusing on developing solutions that will be sustainable not just for the next few decades, but for centuries to come.
• Scenario Planning: Scientists and engineers might use scenario planning to anticipate future challenges and develop technologies that can address them.

5. Ethical Considerations:

• Responsible Innovation: As new technologies are developed, it will be important to consider their ethical implications and ensure that they are used in a responsible way.
• Social Impact: Researchers will need to consider the social impact of sustainable technologies, ensuring that they benefit all members of society and do not exacerbate existing inequalities.

In essence:

The R&D of sustainable technology in 2930 will be a complex and multifaceted endeavor, requiring a long-term vision, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a commitment to ethical and responsible innovation. It will be driven by a deep understanding of scientific principles, a passion for solving environmental challenges, and a desire to create a better future for all.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.

^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.

^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.

^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.

^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.

^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.

^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.

^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.

^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.

^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.

^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.

^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.

^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher

^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)

^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.

^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.

^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.

^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.

^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.

^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972

^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.

^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.

^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.

^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.

^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.

^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)

^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.

^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals

^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.

^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.

^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.

^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.

^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.

^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.

^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.

^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.

^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.

^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.

^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.

^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}

^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine

^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.

^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB

^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.

^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.

^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.

^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.

^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.

^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.

^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.

^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.

^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.

^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.

^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.

^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.

^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.

^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.

^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.

^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.

^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.

^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.