Sustainable Technology of 2920

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 2920 ?

It’s difficult to predict the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2920, as that’s over 900 years in the future! However, based on current trends and advancements, we can make some educated guesses:

1. Radical Resource Efficiency:

Closed-loop systems: Almost all materials will be part of closed-loop systems, where resources are continuously recycled and reused, minimizing waste and the need for raw material extraction.
Advanced material science: Materials will be developed with extreme durability, biodegradability, or the ability to be easily repurposed.
Energy optimization: Energy will be generated and used with near-perfect efficiency, potentially through advanced fusion or other clean energy sources.

2. Harmony with Nature:

Biomimicry: Technologies will be inspired by nature, mimicking natural processes for energy generation, material design, and waste management.
Ecological integration: Human settlements and technologies will be designed to integrate seamlessly with natural ecosystems, minimizing environmental impact and even enhancing biodiversity.
Climate engineering: Advanced technologies may be used to manage and even reverse the effects of climate change, such as carbon capture and solar radiation management.

3. Intelligent Systems:

AI-driven sustainability: Artificial intelligence will play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, predicting environmental changes, and managing complex sustainable systems.
Smart infrastructure: Cities and infrastructure will be equipped with sensors and AI to monitor and optimize energy use, waste management, and other resource flows.
Personalized sustainability: Individuals may have access to technologies that allow them to monitor and manage their own environmental footprint, making sustainable choices easier.

4. Social Sustainability:

Equitable access: Sustainable technologies will be designed to be accessible and affordable for everyone, promoting social equity and reducing disparities.
Sustainable lifestyles: Technologies will support sustainable lifestyles, such as plant-based diets, shared resources, and reduced consumption.
Ethical considerations: Strong ethical frameworks will be in place to guide the development and use of sustainable technologies, ensuring they benefit humanity and the planet.

5. Beyond Earth:

Space-based resources: As Earth’s resources become more constrained, technologies for accessing and utilizing resources from space (such as asteroid mining) may become essential for sustainability.
Interplanetary sustainability: If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be crucial for creating self-sustaining settlements on other planets.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual nature of sustainable technology in 2920 will depend on countless factors, including scientific advancements, societal choices, and unforeseen challenges. However, the pursuit of sustainability will undoubtedly be a driving force behind technological innovation in the centuries to come.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2920 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2920 is a fascinating thought experiment! While we can’t know for sure, here are some educated guesses based on current trends and advancements:

1. Radical Resource Efficiency:

Closed-loop systems: Imagine a world where almost all materials are part of closed-loop systems. Resources are continuously recycled and reused, minimizing waste and the need for raw material extraction.
Advanced material science: Materials will be developed with extreme durability, biodegradability, or the ability to be easily repurposed.
Energy optimization: Energy will be generated and used with near-perfect efficiency, potentially through advanced fusion or other clean energy sources.

2. Harmony with Nature:

Biomimicry: Technologies will be inspired by nature, mimicking natural processes for energy generation, material design, and waste management.
Ecological integration: Human settlements and technologies will be designed to integrate seamlessly with natural ecosystems, minimizing environmental impact and even enhancing biodiversity.
Climate engineering: Advanced technologies may be used to manage and even reverse the effects of climate change, such as carbon capture and solar radiation management.

3. Intelligent Systems:

AI-driven sustainability: Artificial intelligence will play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, predicting environmental changes, and managing complex sustainable systems.
Smart infrastructure: Cities and infrastructure will be equipped with sensors and AI to monitor and optimize energy use, waste management, and other resource flows.
Personalized sustainability: Individuals may have access to technologies that allow them to monitor and manage their own environmental footprint, making sustainable choices easier.

4. Social Sustainability:

Equitable access: Sustainable technologies will be designed to be accessible and affordable for everyone, promoting social equity and reducing disparities.
Sustainable lifestyles: Technologies will support sustainable lifestyles, such as plant-based diets, shared resources, and reduced consumption.
Ethical considerations: Strong ethical frameworks will be in place to guide the development and use of sustainable technologies, ensuring they benefit humanity and the planet.

5. Beyond Earth:

Space-based resources: As Earth’s resources become more constrained, technologies for accessing and utilizing resources from space (such as asteroid mining) may become essential for sustainability.
Interplanetary sustainability: If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be crucial for creating self-sustaining settlements on other planets.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2920 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 2920 will be essential for everyone, rather than just “required.” Here’s why:

Planetary survival: By 2920, the consequences of unsustainable practices will likely be far more severe. Sustainable technology will be crucial for mitigating climate change, managing resources, and ensuring the planet remains habitable for future generations.
Resource scarcity: As resources become more limited, sustainable technologies will be necessary for efficient resource management, recycling, and finding alternatives to scarce materials.
Economic viability: In a world facing environmental challenges, sustainable technologies will be key to economic stability and growth. They will drive innovation, create new industries, and ensure long-term prosperity.
Social equity: Sustainable technologies can help address social inequalities by ensuring access to clean energy, water, and other essential resources for everyone.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2920 won’t be a matter of choice, but a necessity for human civilization to thrive. It will be deeply integrated into every aspect of life, from how we produce energy and food to how we design our cities and interact with the natural world.

While everyone will benefit from sustainable technology, some may have a greater responsibility in its development and implementation:

Scientists and engineers: They will be at the forefront of developing new sustainable technologies and finding innovative solutions to environmental challenges.
Policymakers and leaders: They will need to create policies and frameworks that encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies and promote responsible resource management.
Individuals: Everyone will have a role to play in adopting sustainable practices in their daily lives, from conserving energy and reducing waste to supporting sustainable businesses and advocating for change.

Ultimately, the success of sustainable technology in 2920 will depend on collective effort and a shared commitment to creating a healthy and prosperous future for all.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2920 ?

This is a really interesting question! It gets at the heart of why we talk about sustainable technology in the first place.

While the most critical need for fully realized sustainable technology might be in 2920, the truth is that we already need it. We’re in a situation where the consequences of unsustainable practices are becoming more and more apparent.

Here’s a breakdown of why sustainable technology is needed now, and why the need will only grow:

Now: We are already experiencing the effects of climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. Sustainable technologies can help us mitigate these effects, transition to cleaner energy sources, and develop more efficient ways of using resources.
The near future: As the global population grows and consumption patterns increase, the pressure on our planet’s resources will intensify. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for ensuring that everyone has access to basic necessities like clean water and energy, while minimizing environmental impact.
The distant future (like 2920): By 2920, the cumulative effects of unsustainable practices could be catastrophic. Sustainable technology will be essential for ensuring the long-term survival and well-being of human civilization and the planet.

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology is not something that will suddenly appear in the future. It’s a need that we must address now and continue to prioritize in the years to come. The sooner we develop and implement sustainable technologies, the better equipped we will be to face the challenges of the future.

It’s like planting a tree: the best time to plant it was yesterday, but the second best time is today. The same goes for sustainable technology – we need it now, and we’ll need it even more in the future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2920 ?

That’s a great question that requires us to think big! Here’s how I’d interpret “where” in the context of sustainable technology in 2920:

1. Everywhere on Earth:

Urban centers: Cities will be designed as eco-districts with integrated green spaces, energy-efficient buildings, and smart infrastructure for resource management.
Rural areas: Sustainable agriculture, renewable energy generation, and ecological restoration will be prevalent in rural landscapes.
Natural ecosystems: Technologies will be used to monitor, protect, and even enhance biodiversity in natural habitats.
Oceans and atmosphere: Advanced technologies will be deployed to clean up pollution, manage marine resources, and regulate the climate.

2. Beyond Earth:

Space-based habitats: If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be crucial for creating self-sustaining settlements on other planets or in space.
Resource extraction: Technologies for mining asteroids or other celestial bodies will need to be sustainable to avoid environmental damage in space.
Interplanetary travel: Sustainable propulsion systems and life support systems will be necessary for long-duration space missions.

3. In the digital realm:

Cyberinfrastructure: Sustainable data centers, energy-efficient computing, and responsible AI will be essential for a sustainable digital world.
Virtual environments: Sustainable technologies may be used to create virtual worlds that allow us to experience nature and explore alternative realities without impacting the physical world.

4. In our bodies and minds:

Personalized health: Sustainable technologies may be used to monitor our health, prevent diseases, and even enhance our physical and cognitive abilities in a sustainable way.
Consciousness and awareness: Technologies may be developed to promote mindfulness, compassion, and a deeper understanding of our connection to the natural world, fostering a more sustainable mindset.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 2920 will need to be integrated into every aspect of our lives and environment, both on Earth and beyond. It will be a pervasive force shaping our world and ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2920 ?

That’s a crucial question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will exist in 2920, but how it will be achieved. Here’s a look at the key elements:

1. Continuous Innovation:

Research and development: Massive and ongoing investment in scientific research and technological development will be essential. This includes exploring new materials, energy sources, and technological approaches.
Interdisciplinary collaboration: Scientists, engineers, designers, and other experts from diverse fields will need to work together to create holistic and sustainable solutions.
Open knowledge sharing: Global collaboration and open access to research findings will accelerate the pace of innovation.

2. Systems Thinking:

Holistic approach: Sustainable technology won’t be about isolated solutions, but about integrated systems. For example, sustainable cities will require integrated solutions for energy, transportation, waste management, and food production.
Life cycle assessment: Technologies will be designed with their entire life cycle in mind, from resource extraction to end-of-life management, minimizing environmental impact at every stage.
Resilience and adaptability: Sustainable systems will need to be resilient to environmental changes and adaptable to new challenges.

3. Ethical Considerations:

Values-driven innovation: Ethical frameworks will guide the development and use of sustainable technologies, ensuring they align with human values and promote social justice.
Transparency and accountability: The development and deployment of sustainable technologies will need to be transparent and accountable to the public.
Precautionary principle: In cases of uncertainty, a precautionary approach will be taken to avoid unintended consequences and protect the environment.

4. Societal Transformation:

Education and awareness: Public education and awareness campaigns will be crucial for fostering a culture of sustainability and encouraging the adoption of sustainable technologies.
Behavioral change: Sustainable technologies will need to be accompanied by changes in individual and societal behaviors, such as reducing consumption, adopting sustainable lifestyles, and supporting sustainable businesses.
Global cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require international cooperation and the sharing of sustainable technologies across borders.

5. Economic Incentives:

Sustainable investments: Governments and businesses will need to prioritize investments in sustainable technologies and create economic incentives for their adoption.
Circular economy: Shifting towards a circular economy, where resources are continuously reused and recycled, will be essential for achieving long-term sustainability.
Sustainable business models: Businesses will need to develop sustainable business models that prioritize environmental and social responsibility alongside economic growth.

Achieving sustainable technology by 2920 will be a long and complex process, but by focusing on these key elements, we can create a future where technology and sustainability go hand in hand.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2920 ?

It’s tough to give a specific “case study” for sustainable technology in 2920, as that’s so far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and imagine what it might look like. Think of it as a “future history” case study:

Case Study: The Integrated Eco-City of Aurora, 2920

Background: By the late 29th century, climate change and resource depletion have drastically reshaped the world. Coastal cities are submerged, and extreme weather events are common. Aurora is one of a new generation of eco-cities, designed to be completely self-sufficient and in harmony with nature.

Key Sustainable Technologies:

Atmospheric Energy Harvesting: Aurora is powered by a network of advanced atmospheric energy harvesters that capture energy from wind, solar radiation, and even subtle temperature differences in the air. This provides a constant and clean energy supply.
Closed-Loop Resource Systems: All materials in Aurora are part of a closed-loop system. Waste is not discarded but is processed and transformed back into usable resources. Advanced recycling technologies can separate materials at the molecular level, allowing for near-perfect resource recovery.
Vertical Farms and Aquaponics: Food is produced locally in vertical farms that utilize hydroponics and aquaponics. These systems are highly efficient, requiring minimal land and water, and they provide fresh, nutritious food for the city’s inhabitants.
Biomimetic Architecture: Buildings in Aurora are designed using principles of biomimicry, taking inspiration from nature. They are energy-efficient, resilient to extreme weather, and seamlessly integrated with the surrounding environment.
AI-Powered Sustainability Management: An advanced AI system monitors and optimizes all aspects of Aurora’s sustainability, from energy use and resource flow to transportation and waste management. The AI can predict potential problems and proactively adjust systems to maintain balance.
Personalized Sustainability Devices: Citizens of Aurora have access to personal devices that monitor their environmental footprint and provide personalized recommendations for sustainable living. These devices make it easy for individuals to make informed choices that benefit the environment.

Outcomes:

Zero Carbon Emissions: Aurora has achieved zero net carbon emissions, contributing to the global effort to combat climate change.
Resource Independence: The city is virtually resource-independent, reducing its reliance on external sources and minimizing its impact on the planet.
Thriving Ecosystem: Aurora is integrated with the surrounding natural ecosystem, supporting biodiversity and providing habitats for local flora and fauna.
High Quality of Life: Residents of Aurora enjoy a high quality of life, with access to clean energy, fresh food, and a healthy environment.

Lessons Learned:

Long-term vision: The success of Aurora demonstrates the importance of long-term vision and commitment to sustainability.
Technological innovation: Continuous innovation is crucial for developing the sustainable technologies needed to address complex environmental challenges.
Systems thinking: A holistic and integrated approach is essential for creating truly sustainable solutions.
Social responsibility: Individual and collective responsibility are vital for achieving a sustainable future.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology in 2920 might be achieved through a combination of scientific advancements, systems thinking, ethical considerations, and societal transformation. It highlights the potential for technology to create a world where human civilization and nature can thrive together.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2920 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2920: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2920. Based on current trends, emerging technologies, and the imperative for a thriving planet, we envision a future where sustainability is deeply integrated into every facet of human life, both on Earth and beyond. This paper examines key areas of technological advancement, societal shifts, and ethical considerations necessary to achieve a truly sustainable civilization in the 29th century.

1. Introduction:

The 29th century presents both immense challenges and unprecedented opportunities. Projected population growth, resource limitations, and the long-term effects of climate change necessitate a radical shift towards sustainable practices. This paper argues that technological innovation, guided by ethical principles and a global commitment to sustainability, will be crucial in navigating these challenges and creating a future where humanity and the planet flourish.

2. Core Technological Pillars:

Radical Resource Efficiency: By 2920, closed-loop systems will be the norm. Advanced material science will produce incredibly durable, biodegradable, and easily repurposed materials. Nanotechnology will enable precise manipulation of matter, allowing for on-demand recycling and resource transformation. “Waste” as we understand it today will be a relic of the past.
Clean and Abundant Energy: Fusion power, or another equally transformative energy source, will provide clean, abundant, and globally accessible energy. Advanced energy storage solutions will ensure grid stability and enable off-grid energy independence. Energy harvesting from ambient sources (vibrations, temperature differentials, etc.) will supplement large-scale generation.
Ecological Integration: Biomimicry will inspire the design of technologies that work in harmony with natural ecosystems. Infrastructure will be designed to enhance biodiversity and provide ecosystem services. Advanced ecological restoration techniques will repair damaged ecosystems and revitalize degraded lands.
Intelligent Systems and AI: Artificial intelligence will be integral to optimizing resource use, predicting environmental changes, and managing complex sustainable systems. Smart infrastructure will monitor and adjust energy consumption, waste management, and resource allocation in real-time. AI will also play a crucial role in developing new sustainable materials and technologies.
Space-Based Resources and Exploration: Accessing and utilizing resources from space will become increasingly important. Sustainable asteroid mining and other space-based resource extraction techniques will supplement terrestrial resources. Sustainable space propulsion systems and closed-loop life support systems will enable long-duration space travel and the establishment of off-world settlements.

3. Societal Transformation:

Sustainable Lifestyles: Sustainable technologies will empower individuals to make informed choices about their consumption and environmental impact. Personalized sustainability devices will track individual footprints and provide tailored recommendations for reducing their impact. Sharing economies and collaborative consumption models will be widely adopted.
Global Cooperation and Governance: Addressing global sustainability challenges will require unprecedented levels of international cooperation. Global governance structures will be needed to manage shared resources, enforce environmental regulations, and promote sustainable development.
Ethical Frameworks: Robust ethical frameworks will guide the development and deployment of sustainable technologies. Transparency, accountability, and public participation will be essential to ensuring that these technologies are used in a responsible and equitable manner. The precautionary principle will be central to decision-making, minimizing the risk of unintended consequences.
Education and Awareness: Education systems will emphasize sustainability and environmental stewardship. Public awareness campaigns will foster a deep understanding of the interconnectedness between human actions and the health of the planet.

4. Challenges and Opportunities:

Technological Hurdles: Significant technological breakthroughs will be required to achieve the vision outlined in this paper. Continued investment in research and development will be essential.
Economic Transition: Shifting to a sustainable economy will require significant economic restructuring. Policies that incentivize sustainable practices and discourage unsustainable ones will be crucial.
Social and Political Resistance: Overcoming resistance to change and fostering widespread adoption of sustainable practices will be a major challenge. Effective communication and public engagement will be essential.

5. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 2920 will be the result of centuries of innovation, collaboration, and a fundamental shift in human values. By embracing sustainability as a core principle and investing in the technologies and social structures that support it, we can create a future where humanity and the planet thrive together. This vision is not merely aspirational; it is a necessity for the long-term well-being of our species and the preservation of our planet.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2920 ?

You’re asking a great question that gets to the heart of how sustainable technology could revolutionize industries in the future! Here are some potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2920:

1. Manufacturing:

Closed-loop production systems: Factories will operate on closed-loop principles, where all materials are continuously recycled and reused. Advanced recycling technologies will be able to break down complex products into their constituent materials and repurpose them for new products.
On-demand manufacturing: Nanotechnology and 3D printing will enable on-demand manufacturing of goods, reducing waste and allowing for highly customized products.
Sustainable materials: Industries will rely on materials that are either incredibly durable, biodegradable, or easily repurposed. Biomanufacturing, using biological systems to produce materials, will be common.
Energy-efficient processes: Manufacturing processes will be optimized for energy efficiency, utilizing renewable energy sources and minimizing waste heat.

2. Energy:

Decentralized energy grids: Energy will be generated and distributed through smart, decentralized grids, powered by a combination of renewable sources like fusion, solar, wind, and geothermal.
Advanced energy storage: Highly efficient energy storage solutions will ensure grid stability and enable off-grid energy independence for industries and communities.
Energy harvesting: Industries will utilize technologies that harvest energy from their surroundings, such as vibrations, temperature differences, and even ambient electromagnetic fields.

3. Agriculture:

Vertical farming and aquaponics: Food production will shift towards highly efficient vertical farms and aquaponic systems that require minimal land and water.
Precision agriculture: AI and sensor technologies will enable precision agriculture, optimizing resource use and minimizing environmental impact.
Sustainable fertilizers and pesticides: Biologically based fertilizers and pesticides will replace synthetic chemicals, reducing pollution and promoting soil health.

4. Transportation:

Electric and autonomous vehicles: Transportation will be dominated by electric vehicles powered by clean energy sources. Autonomous driving systems will optimize traffic flow and reduce energy consumption.
Hyperloops and maglev trains: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops and maglev trains will connect cities and regions, minimizing travel time
Sustainable aviation fuels: The aviation industry will transition to sustainable aviation fuels made from renewable resources, reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

5. Construction:

Biomimetic architecture: Buildings will be designed using principles of biomimicry, taking inspiration from nature to create energy-efficient, resilient, and environmentally friendly structures.
Self-healing materials: Construction materials will be developed with self-healing properties, extending their lifespan and reducing maintenance needs.
Modular construction: Modular construction techniques will allow for faster and more sustainable building processes, reducing waste and enabling easy adaptation to changing needs.

6. Resource extraction:

Sustainable mining practices: Mining operations will be minimized and conducted with strict environmental safeguards, focusing on extracting essential resources while minimizing damage to ecosystems.
Space-based resources: As terrestrial resources become more limited, industries may increasingly rely on resources extracted from space, such as asteroid mining.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could revolutionize industries in 2920. The key is that sustainability will not be an afterthought, but a core principle driving innovation and shaping industrial practices. By prioritizing resource efficiency, ecological integration, and ethical considerations, industries can contribute to a thriving and sustainable future for all.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2920 ?

It’s fascinating to think about the kind of research and development that might lead to the sustainable technologies of 2920! Here’s a breakdown of potential areas of focus, keeping in mind that this is imaginative speculation based on current trends:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

Self-healing and adaptive materials: Imagine materials that can repair themselves when damaged or even adapt their properties in response to environmental changes. This could revolutionize construction, manufacturing, and even personal devices.
Programmable matter: This involves materials that can be manipulated at the atomic level to change their shape, density, or other properties on demand. This could enable on-demand manufacturing, self-assembling structures, and even transformable objects.
Biomimetic materials: Scientists will likely draw even more inspiration from nature to create materials with exceptional properties, such as the strength of spider silk, the water resistance of lotus leaves, or the light-capturing efficiency of plant cells.

2. Energy:

Fusion energy: Continued research into fusion power is likely to be a major focus, with the goal of achieving a safe, efficient, and commercially viable fusion reactor.
Exotic energy sources: Scientists may explore more unconventional energy sources, such as zero-point energy, or harnessing energy from other dimensions (if such a thing exists!).
Advanced energy storage: Developing highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions will be crucial for utilizing intermittent renewable energy sources and powering off-grid systems.

3. Artificial Intelligence and Computation:

Neuromorphic computing: This involves building computers that mimic the structure and function of the human brain, potentially leading to AI systems with greater intelligence and energy efficiency.
Quantum computing: Quantum computers could revolutionize fields like materials science, drug discovery, and AI, enabling breakthroughs that are currently impossible.
AI for sustainability: AI will be used to optimize complex systems, predict environmental changes, and develop new sustainable technologies.

4. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Synthetic biology: This involves designing and building new biological systems, potentially leading to the creation of microorganisms that can produce biofuels, clean up pollution, or even manufacture new materials.
Biomanufacturing: Using biological systems to produce materials, chemicals, and even energy will become increasingly common, offering sustainable alternatives to traditional manufacturing processes.
Brain-computer interfaces: These interfaces could allow humans to directly interact with computers and AI systems, potentially leading to new ways of managing resources and interacting with the environment.

5. Space Technologies:

Advanced propulsion systems: Developing more efficient and sustainable space propulsion systems will be crucial for long-duration space travel and accessing resources from space.
Closed-loop life support systems: Creating self-sustaining ecosystems in space will be essential for establishing off-world settlements.
Space-based resource utilization: Technologies for mining asteroids and other celestial bodies will need to be developed in a sustainable way to avoid environmental damage in space.

6. Social and Ethical Research:

Sustainable development pathways: Researchers will need to explore different pathways for achieving sustainability, considering not only technological factors but also social, economic, and political aspects.
Ethical implications of technology: As technology advances, it will be crucial to address the ethical implications of new technologies, ensuring they are used in a responsible and equitable manner.
Public engagement: Research will need to engage the public in discussions about sustainable technology, ensuring that technological development aligns with societal values and needs.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential research and development that could shape the sustainable technology of 2920. The actual path of technological innovation will depend on countless factors, including scientific discoveries, societal choices, and unforeseen challenges. However, one thing is certain: the pursuit of sustainability will be a major driver of research and development in the centuries to come.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.

^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.

^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.

^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.

^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.

^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.

^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.

^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.

^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.

^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher

^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)

^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.

^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.

^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.

^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.

^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972

^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.

^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.

^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.

^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.

^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)

^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.

^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals

^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.

^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.

^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.

^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.

^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.

^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.

^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.

^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.

^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.

^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.

^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}

^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine

^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.

^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.

^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.

^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.

^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.

^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.

^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.

^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.

^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.

^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.

^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.

^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.

^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.

^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.

^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.

^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.

^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.

^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.