Sustainable Technology of 2850

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 2850 ?

It’s impossible to predict with certainty what sustainable technology will look like in 2850. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments:

Potential Trends in Sustainable Technology by 2850:

Advanced Energy Solutions:
- Fusion Power: If we achieve controlled nuclear fusion, it could provide a clean, abundant, and virtually inexhaustible energy source.
- Space-Based Solar Power: Harvesting solar energy in space and beaming it down to Earth could provide a continuous and highly efficient source of renewable energy.
- Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and long-lasting energy storage solutions will be crucial for balancing intermittent renewable energy sources like solar and wind.
Closed-Loop Resource Systems:
- Circular Economy: Technologies that enable a truly circular economy, where resources are continuously reused and recycled, could become highly advanced.
- Waste Transformation: Waste might be seen as a valuable resource, with advanced technologies capable of breaking down waste into its basic components and repurposing them.
Ecological Restoration and Enhancement:
- Advanced Reforestation Techniques: Technologies that can rapidly reforest degraded areas and even engineer trees with enhanced carbon sequestration capabilities.
- Ocean Restoration: Methods for restoring damaged ocean ecosystems, coral reefs, and fisheries, possibly using advanced robotics and biotechnology.
Sustainable Agriculture and Food Production:
- Vertical Farming: Highly efficient vertical farms in urban areas, utilizing minimal land and water resources to produce food locally.
- Cultivated Meat and Alternative Proteins: Technologies for producing meat and other protein sources in a sustainable way, reducing the environmental impact of traditional animal agriculture.
Smart and Sustainable Cities:
- AI-Powered Infrastructure: Cities managed by artificial intelligence to optimize energy use, traffic flow, and resource allocation.
- Self-Healing Materials: Infrastructure built with materials that can self-repair, reducing maintenance needs and extending lifespan.

Important Considerations:

Technological Advancements: The technologies mentioned above are based on current scientific understanding and trends. Unexpected breakthroughs could lead to entirely new solutions we can’t even imagine today.
Social and Economic Factors: The adoption and implementation of sustainable technologies will depend not only on their technical feasibility but also on social, economic, and political factors.
Ethical Considerations: As technology advances, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of its use, ensuring that it benefits humanity and the planet as a whole.

In Conclusion:

While it’s challenging to predict the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2850, it’s likely to be characterized by highly advanced solutions that enable us to live in harmony with the planet’s resources and ecosystems. It will require a combination of scientific innovation, social awareness, and a commitment to ethical and sustainable practices.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2850 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2850 is a fun thought experiment! While we can’t know for sure, we can speculate based on current trends and potential advancements. Here are some possibilities:

Energy:

Fusion Power: If we crack the code to controlled nuclear fusion, it could provide clean, abundant, and virtually limitless energy.
Space-Based Solar: Imagine solar farms in space beaming energy down to Earth. This could provide a continuous and highly efficient renewable source.
Advanced Energy Storage: Super-efficient batteries or other storage solutions would be essential to balance intermittent renewables like solar and wind.

Resources:

Circular Economy Mastery: We might achieve a truly circular economy where resources are continuously reused and recycled, minimizing waste.
Waste Transformation: Waste could become a valuable resource, with technology to break it down into its basic components for repurposing.

Environment:

Ecological Restoration: Advanced techniques could help rapidly reforest areas and even engineer trees with enhanced carbon-capture abilities.
Ocean Restoration: We might have ways to revitalize damaged ocean ecosystems, coral reefs, and fisheries, possibly using robotics and biotechnology.

Food:

Vertical Farming: Highly efficient vertical farms in urban areas could produce food locally with minimal land and water.
Cultivated Meat: Technologies for producing meat and other proteins sustainably could reduce the impact of traditional agriculture.

Cities:

AI-Powered Infrastructure: Cities could be managed by AI to optimize energy, traffic, and resource allocation.
Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure might be built with materials that can self-repair, reducing maintenance.

Important Notes:

Unpredictability: Technology advances in unpredictable ways. There could be breakthroughs we can’t even imagine today.
Social Factors: Adoption of sustainable tech depends on social, economic, and political factors, not just technical feasibility.
Ethics: As tech advances, ethical considerations are crucial to ensure it benefits everyone and the planet.

In short, sustainable technology in 2850 will likely involve highly advanced solutions for living in harmony with Earth’s resources and ecosystems. It will require innovation, social awareness, and a commitment to ethical and sustainable practices.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2850 ?

It’s a great question to consider who will need sustainable technology in 2850! Here’s a breakdown:

Everyone on Earth: Ultimately, sustainable technology in 2850 will be essential for the well-being and survival of all human civilization. It will be about ensuring access to clean energy, resources, and a healthy environment for everyone.
Future Generations: Those living in 2850 and beyond will inherit the consequences of our actions today. Sustainable technology will be crucial for them to thrive and continue to live on a healthy planet.
Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Sustainable technology will also be needed to protect and restore the Earth’s ecosystems and biodiversity. This includes all living organisms, not just humans.
Industries and Economies: Businesses and economies will need sustainable technologies to operate in a way that doesn’t deplete resources or damage the environment. This will involve circular economy models, renewable energy, and responsible resource management.
Governments and Policy Makers: Governments will play a key role in promoting and regulating the development and use of sustainable technology. This includes setting standards, incentivizing innovation, and ensuring equitable access.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2850 will be a collective necessity. It will require a global effort from individuals, communities, industries, and governments to create a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2850 ?

That’s a very insightful question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will be in 2850, but when it will be needed. The answer is: It’s needed now, and increasingly so as we move closer to 2850.

Here’s why:

The decisions we make today shape the future: The technologies we develop and the practices we adopt now will have long-lasting consequences. If we don’t prioritize sustainability today, we risk creating a future where the challenges are even greater and solutions are harder to implement.
Environmental degradation is happening now: Climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are already impacting our planet. We need sustainable solutions now to mitigate these effects and prevent further damage.
Technological development takes time: Researching, developing, and implementing new technologies, especially complex ones like fusion power or advanced ecological restoration, takes decades, if not centuries. We need to start working on these solutions now to have them available when we need them most.
Building a sustainable society is a process: Shifting to a truly sustainable way of life requires changes in infrastructure, economies, social norms, and individual behaviors. This is a gradual process that needs to start now and continue over time.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology in 2850 is not a future problem, but a present imperative. The actions we take today will determine whether sustainable technology is available and effective enough to meet the challenges of the future.

It’s like planting a tree: you plant it today not just for yourself, but for future generations to enjoy its shade and fruits. Similarly, we need to invest in sustainable technology now to ensure a healthy and thriving planet for those who will live in 2850 and beyond.Sources and related content

courtesy : Innovatek Solutions

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2850 ?

That’s a great question that gets at the heart of how we need to think about sustainable technology! Here’s a breakdown of where sustainable technology will be required in 2850 (and, importantly, where it’s needed now to get us there):

Everywhere! Sustainable technology in 2850 won’t be confined to specific locations, but rather integrated into all aspects of life and society. Here are some key areas:

Cities and Urban Centers: This is where the majority of people will likely live. Sustainable technology will be needed for:
- Energy: Renewable energy systems, smart grids, energy-efficient buildings.
- Transportation: Electric vehicles, public transportation, and infrastructure designed for minimal environmental impact.
- Waste Management: Advanced recycling and resource recovery systems, closed-loop systems.
- Food Production: Vertical farms, urban agriculture, and sustainable food distribution systems.
Rural Areas and Agriculture: Sustainable technology will be crucial for:
- Food Production: Sustainable farming practices, precision agriculture, and technologies to reduce water and land use.
- Resource Management: Sustainable forestry, water management, and conservation.
- Renewable Energy: Off-grid renewable energy systems for remote communities.
Oceans and Marine Environments: Sustainable technology will be needed to:
- Protect Ecosystems: Technologies to restore coral reefs, clean up pollution, and manage fisheries sustainably.
- Harness Ocean Resources: Sustainable aquaculture and technologies to generate energy from ocean currents or waves.
Space: As humanity potentially expands beyond Earth, sustainable technology will be essential for:
- Resource Utilization: Mining asteroids or other celestial bodies in a sustainable way.
- Energy Production: Space-based solar power or other energy sources.
- Life Support: Developing closed-loop life support systems for space habitats.

Thinking Globally, Acting Locally:

While these are some broad categories, it’s important to remember that sustainable technology needs will vary depending on local contexts. Factors like climate, geography, and resource availability will influence the specific technologies that are needed in different regions.

The Importance of Now:

It’s crucial to emphasize that the need for sustainable technology is not just a future concern. We need to be developing and implementing these technologies now to address the challenges we face today and to create a foundation for a sustainable future in 2850.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2850 will be a global imperative, integrated into every aspect of human life and essential for the health of our planet and the well-being of future generations.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2850 ?

You’re asking a crucial question! It’s not just about what and when sustainable technology is needed, but how it will be required. Here’s a look at the ways sustainable technology will be essential in 2850:

1. As a Foundation for Society:

Essential Infrastructure: Sustainable technology will be the bedrock of infrastructure in 2850. This includes energy systems, transportation networks, communication systems, and resource management facilities. Everything will need to be designed and operated with sustainability in mind.
Basic Needs: Access to clean water, nutritious food, and safe shelter will rely heavily on sustainable technologies. These technologies will need to be efficient, resilient, and adaptable to changing environmental conditions.

2. For Economic Activity:

Sustainable Industries: All industries, from manufacturing to agriculture to services, will need to operate within sustainable frameworks. This means minimizing waste, using renewable energy, and prioritizing resource efficiency.
Circular Economy: The concept of a circular economy, where resources are continuously reused and recycled, will be central to economic activity. Sustainable technologies will be needed to enable this, such as advanced recycling systems and bio-based materials.

3. To Maintain a Healthy Environment:

Ecosystem Restoration: Sustainable technologies will be crucial for restoring and protecting ecosystems. This includes reforestation efforts, ocean cleanup, and technologies to mitigate the effects of climate change.
Biodiversity Preservation: Protecting biodiversity will require sustainable technologies that can monitor ecosystems, prevent habitat loss, and manage wildlife populations.

4. For Social Well-being:

Equitable Access: Sustainable technologies will need to be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status. This is crucial for ensuring social justice and preventing inequalities.
Improved Quality of Life: Sustainable technologies can improve quality of life by providing access to clean energy, efficient transportation, and healthy environments.

5. As a Driver of Innovation:

Continuous Improvement: Sustainable technology will not be static. It will need to continuously evolve and improve to meet new challenges and opportunities. This will require ongoing research and development, as well as a culture of innovation.

Important Considerations:

Integration: Sustainable technologies will need to be integrated into all aspects of life and society. This requires a holistic approach that considers the interconnectedness of different systems.
Adaptability: The world of 2850 will likely be very different from today. Sustainable technologies will need to be adaptable to changing conditions, such as climate change and population growth.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2850 will be more than just a set of tools. It will be a way of life, a fundamental principle that guides how we live, work, and interact with the planet.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2850 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific “case study” of sustainable technology in 2850, as that would involve detailed projections centuries into the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential advancements. Here’s an example:

Case Study: The Integrated City of Aurora, 2850

Background:

By 2850, many cities have evolved into highly integrated and sustainable systems. Aurora is a prime example, built on the principles of circularity, renewable energy, and ecological harmony.

Key Sustainable Technologies in Use:

Fusion Power Grid: Aurora is powered by a network of fusion reactors, providing clean and abundant energy for all its needs.
Atmospheric Water Capture: Advanced systems extract water from the atmosphere, ensuring a constant supply of clean water even in arid regions.
Vertical Farms and Algae Cultivation: Multi-level vertical farms within the city produce a significant portion of its food, supplemented by large-scale algae cultivation for protein and biofuels.
Advanced Recycling and Resource Recovery: Nearly all waste is processed and reused. Advanced technologies break down materials into their basic components, which are then used to create new products.
AI-Powered Resource Management: An AI system monitors and optimizes the city’s resource flows, from energy consumption to waste management, ensuring efficiency and minimizing environmental impact.
Bio-Integrated Architecture: Buildings are designed to integrate with the natural environment, incorporating green spaces, living walls, and materials that can self-repair or biodegrade.
Personalized Public Transportation: A network of autonomous electric vehicles and high-speed public transport systems provide efficient and sustainable mobility for all residents.

Outcomes:

Zero-Carbon Footprint: Aurora has achieved a net-zero carbon footprint, contributing to the reversal of climate change.
Resource Security: The city is highly resilient in terms of resource availability, with closed-loop systems minimizing reliance on external inputs.
Enhanced Quality of Life: Residents enjoy clean air and water, access to nutritious food, and a high quality of life in a harmonious urban environment.
Thriving Ecosystems: The city’s design and technologies support the restoration and preservation of surrounding ecosystems.

Lessons Learned:

Long-term Vision: Aurora’s success is a result of long-term planning and investment in sustainable technologies.
Integration and Collaboration: The city’s systems are highly integrated, requiring collaboration across different sectors and disciplines.
Technological Innovation: Continuous innovation and adaptation are crucial for addressing emerging challenges and improving sustainability.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technologies, when integrated and implemented effectively, can create thriving and resilient cities in the future. It also highlights the importance of starting today to develop and deploy these technologies to ensure a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2850 ?

White Paper: Envisioning Sustainable Technology in 2850

Abstract:

Predicting the precise nature of sustainable technology in 2850 is an exercise in informed speculation. This white paper explores potential trends and advancements based on current scientific understanding and emerging technologies, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties of long-term forecasting. It emphasizes the crucial role of present-day actions in shaping a sustainable future, highlighting the need for continuous innovation, ethical considerations, and global collaboration.

1. Introduction:

The concept of sustainability necessitates a long-term perspective. While 2850 seems distant, the choices we make today will determine the technological landscape and environmental conditions of that era. This paper examines potential trajectories in sustainable technology, focusing on key areas critical for human and planetary well-being.

2. Energy:

Fusion Power: Controlled nuclear fusion remains a promising, though challenging, avenue for clean, abundant energy. Success in this domain would revolutionize energy production, decoupling it from fossil fuels and mitigating climate change.
Space-Based Solar Power: Harvesting solar energy in space offers the potential for continuous, high-intensity energy collection. Advancements in space infrastructure and energy transmission could make this a viable option.
Advanced Energy Storage: Efficient and scalable energy storage is crucial for integrating intermittent renewable sources. Developments in battery technology, pumped hydro, or novel storage methods will be essential.

3. Resource Management:

Circular Economy Mastery: Achieving a truly circular economy, where resources are perpetually reused and recycled, will require breakthroughs in material science, manufacturing processes, and waste management technologies.
Waste Transformation: Waste will likely be viewed as a valuable resource. Advanced technologies could break down complex materials into their constituent components, enabling their repurposing into new products.
Resource Extraction Optimization: Sustainable resource extraction will involve minimizing environmental impact through advanced techniques, including AI-driven resource mapping and precision mining.

4. Environmental Stewardship:

Ecological Restoration and Enhancement: Advanced biotechnologies and ecological engineering could enable large-scale ecosystem restoration, including reforestation, ocean revitalization, and biodiversity enhancement.
Climate Engineering: While potentially controversial, climate engineering technologies, such as carbon capture and storage or solar radiation management, may play a role in mitigating climate change impacts.
Pollution Remediation: Nanomaterials and other advanced technologies could be deployed for targeted pollution removal from air, water, and soil.

5. Food Systems:

Sustainable Agriculture: Precision agriculture, vertical farming, and other innovative approaches will be needed to increase food production while minimizing resource use and environmental impact.
Alternative Proteins: Cultivated meat, plant-based proteins, and other alternative protein sources could reduce reliance on traditional animal agriculture, lessening its environmental footprint.

6. Smart and Sustainable Cities:

AI-Powered Infrastructure: Smart cities managed by AI could optimize energy consumption, traffic flow, resource allocation, and waste management.
Self-Healing Materials: Infrastructure built with self-healing materials could reduce maintenance needs and extend lifespan, enhancing sustainability and resilience.

7. Ethical and Social Considerations:

Equitable Access: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies is paramount. Addressing potential disparities will require proactive policies and global cooperation.
Technological Governance: Robust ethical frameworks and regulatory mechanisms will be needed to guide the development and deployment of advanced technologies, preventing unintended consequences.
Social Acceptance: Public understanding and acceptance of new technologies are crucial. Open dialogue and transparency will be essential for building trust and fostering innovation.

8. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 2850 will be the product of choices made today. Investing in research and development, fostering innovation, and promoting global collaboration are critical steps. Equally important are ethical considerations and a commitment to equitable access. By embracing a long-term perspective and prioritizing sustainability, we can pave the way for a thriving future for generations to come.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2850 ?

While predicting specific industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2850 is speculative, we can extrapolate from current trends and potential advancements to envision some possibilities:

1. Manufacturing:

Circular Manufacturing: Factories will operate on closed-loop systems, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization. Advanced recycling technologies will break down products at the end of their life cycle, allowing materials to be reused indefinitely.
Bio-Integrated Manufacturing: Production processes may incorporate biological systems, using engineered organisms to create materials, fuels, or other products sustainably.
Additive Manufacturing (Advanced 3D Printing): Highly sophisticated 3D printing technologies could enable on-demand manufacturing of complex products, reducing waste and transportation needs. Personalized and localized production would become the norm.
Renewable Energy Integration: Manufacturing facilities will be entirely powered by renewable energy sources, such as fusion power or space-based solar, eliminating reliance on fossil fuels.

2. Resource Extraction and Processing:

Sustainable Mining: Advanced robotics and AI could enable precise and minimally invasive mining operations, reducing environmental impact and maximizing resource recovery.
Asteroid Mining: Extraterrestrial resource extraction could become a reality, providing access to rare minerals and other materials without further depleting Earth’s resources. This would require highly automated and sustainable technologies.
Advanced Material Science: Development of new, sustainable materials with unique properties (e.g., self-healing, biodegradable, super-strong) will revolutionize manufacturing and construction.

3. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Large-scale vertical farms in urban areas will produce food locally, minimizing transportation costs and environmental impact. Controlled environments will optimize resource use and eliminate the need for pesticides.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors, AI, and robotics will enable highly precise and efficient farming practices, optimizing water use, fertilizer application, and crop yields.
Biomanufacturing of Food: Cultivated meat and other alternative protein sources will be produced at scale using sustainable biomanufacturing processes, reducing the environmental footprint of traditional animal agriculture.

4. Energy Production and Distribution:

Fusion Power Plants: Large-scale fusion reactors will provide clean and abundant energy to power industries and cities.
Space-Based Solar Farms: Space-based solar power stations will beam energy down to Earth, providing a continuous and highly efficient source of renewable energy.
Smart Grids: Intelligent, self-regulating power grids will optimize energy distribution and minimize losses.

5. Construction and Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure will be built with materials that can self-repair, reducing maintenance needs and extending lifespan.
Bio-Integrated Architecture: Buildings will integrate with the natural environment, incorporating green spaces, living walls, and materials that can biodegrade or be easily recycled.
Modular Construction: Prefabricated, modular building components will be used to create flexible and adaptable structures, reducing waste and construction time.

6. Transportation:

Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Fleets of electric and autonomous vehicles will dominate transportation, reducing emissions and improving efficiency.
Hyperloops and other High-Speed Transport: Advanced transportation systems, such as hyperloops, could enable rapid and sustainable long-distance travel.

7. Waste Management and Recycling:

Advanced Recycling Facilities: Highly automated and efficient recycling facilities will be able to separate and process materials at the molecular level, enabling near-total resource recovery.
Waste-to-Energy Technologies: Advanced technologies will convert waste into usable energy, further reducing landfill burden and creating a circular economy.

Key Considerations:

Automation and AI: Many of these industrial applications will rely heavily on automation and AI, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.
Global Collaboration: Developing and implementing these sustainable technologies will require global collaboration and knowledge sharing.
Ethical Implications: It will be essential to consider the ethical implications of these technologies, ensuring that they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

These examples illustrate how sustainable technology could revolutionize industries in 2850. The key is to start developing these technologies now to ensure a sustainable future.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2850 ?

It’s fascinating to think about the research and development needed for sustainable technology in 2850! While we can’t know for sure, here’s a breakdown of potential R&D areas, keeping in mind the long-term nature of this endeavor:

1. Fundamental Science:

New Physics: Exploring areas like quantum physics, advanced materials science, and even the nature of consciousness could unlock entirely new sources of energy, new ways to manipulate matter, and potentially even new forms of computation.
Understanding Complex Systems: Developing a deeper understanding of complex systems like climate, ecosystems, and even social systems will be crucial for predicting and managing the impacts of technology.

2. Energy:

Fusion Energy Mastery: Continued research into fusion energy is paramount. This includes plasma physics, materials science to contain super-hot plasmas, and efficient energy extraction and conversion.
Exotic Energy Sources: Investigating more “out there” possibilities like zero-point energy or harnessing other forms of energy we may not yet understand.
Advanced Energy Storage: Beyond batteries, exploring entirely new ways to store energy, perhaps using physical principles we haven’t yet discovered.

3. Materials Science:

Programmable Matter: Materials that can change their properties on demand, potentially revolutionizing manufacturing, construction, and even medicine.
Self-Healing and Adaptive Materials: Materials that can repair themselves, adapt to changing conditions, and even grow or biodegrade as needed.
Sustainable Materials: Discovering and developing new materials that are abundant, renewable, and have minimal environmental impact.

4. Biotechnology and Nanotechnology:

Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems to perform specific tasks, such as producing biofuels, cleaning up pollution, or even building materials.
Nanomaterials and Nanomachines: Developing nanoscale devices for targeted drug delivery, environmental cleanup, or even manufacturing at the atomic level.
Bio-Integrated Technologies: Combining biological systems with technology, such as creating living sensors or integrating electronics with the human brain.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Computation:

Quantum Computing: Developing powerful quantum computers to solve problems that are currently intractable, potentially leading to breakthroughs in materials science, medicine, and AI.
Artificial General Intelligence: Creating AI systems with human-level intelligence, which could accelerate scientific discovery and problem-solving.
Sustainable AI: Developing AI systems that are energy-efficient, resource-conscious, and ethically aligned with human values.

6. Space Technologies:

Advanced Propulsion Systems: Developing new ways to travel through space more efficiently, potentially enabling interstellar travel.
Space-Based Resource Utilization: Technologies for mining asteroids, extracting resources from other planets, and even building space habitats.
Terraforming and Planetary Engineering: Long-term research into the possibility of making other planets habitable.

7. Social and Ethical Considerations:

Technology Assessment: Developing robust methods for assessing the long-term impacts of technology, both positive and negative.
Ethical Frameworks: Establishing ethical guidelines for the development and use of advanced technologies, ensuring they are used responsibly and for the benefit of humanity.
Global Collaboration: Fostering international cooperation in research and development to ensure that sustainable technologies are shared and used equitably.

Important Notes:

Interdisciplinary Approach: R&D for sustainable technology in 2850 will require a highly interdisciplinary approach, bringing together experts from different fields.
Long-Term Vision: This research will require a long-term vision and commitment, as many of these technologies may take centuries to develop.
Unpredictability: There will be unexpected discoveries and breakthroughs that will shape the future of sustainable technology in ways we cannot yet imagine.

By investing in these areas of research and development today, we can lay the foundation for a sustainable and thriving future for generations to come.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Reference

^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.

^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.

^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.

^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.

^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.

^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.

^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.

^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.

^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.

^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher

^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)

^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.

^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.

^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.

^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.

^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972

^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.

^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.

^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.

^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.

^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)

^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.

^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals

^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.

^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.

^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.

^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.

^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.

^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.

^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.

^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.

^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.

^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.

^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}

^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine

^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.

^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.

^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.

^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.

^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.

^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.

^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.

^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.

^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.

^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.

^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.

^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.

^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.

^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.

^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.

^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.

^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.

^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.

^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.