Sustainable Technology of 2400

Leave a Comment / Blog / By
78 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 2400 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the exact state of technology in 2400, we can make some educated guesses about the direction of sustainable technology based on current trends:

Possible Trends in Sustainable Technology by 2400:

  • Advanced Energy Sources:
    • Fusion Power: If we achieve practical fusion, it could become a primary energy source, providing clean and abundant power.
    • Space-Based Solar: Large-scale solar farms in orbit could beam energy back to Earth, providing a continuous and inexhaustible supply.
    • Advanced Geothermal: Enhanced geothermal systems could tap into the Earth’s heat with greater efficiency and in more locations.  
  • Carbon Capture and Utilization:
    • Atmospheric Carbon Removal: Technologies to efficiently remove CO2 from the atmosphere could be widely deployed, helping to reverse climate change.
    • Carbon-Negative Manufacturing: Industrial processes could be redesigned to use captured carbon as a raw material, creating products like plastics or fuels.
  • Resource Management:
    • Circular Economy: Highly efficient recycling and reuse systems could minimize waste and the need for virgin materials.  
    • Sustainable Materials: Advanced materials science could lead to the development of biodegradable or easily recyclable replacements for plastics and other problematic materials.
    • Precision Agriculture: Technologies like vertical farms and AI-powered agriculture could optimize food production while minimizing land and water use.  
  • Urban Sustainability:
    • Smart Cities: Urban areas could be managed with AI and sensor networks to optimize energy use, transportation, and resource allocation.  
    • Green Infrastructure: Buildings could be designed to integrate with nature, incorporating green roofs, walls, and other features to improve energy efficiency and air quality.
    • Personalized Transportation: Electric and autonomous vehicles could be integrated into efficient transportation networks, reducing congestion and emissions.
  • Biotechnology:
    • Bio-manufacturing: Engineered organisms could be used to produce fuels, materials, and other products sustainably.  
    • Bioremediation: Biological processes could be used to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.

Important Considerations:

  • Technological Progress: The rate of technological advancement is unpredictable, so some of these developments might happen sooner or later than expected.
  • Societal Factors: The adoption of sustainable technologies will depend on economic, political, and social factors.
  • Unforeseen Innovations: There will likely be technological breakthroughs that we cannot even imagine today.

Overall, the future of sustainable technology looks promising. By 2400, we could have the tools and knowledge to create a truly sustainable civilization that lives in harmony with the planet.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2400 ?

It’s exciting to imagine the possibilities of sustainable technology in 2400! Here are some potential trends, building upon current advancements:

1. Energy:

  • Fusion Power: This could be a primary energy source, providing clean and abundant power. Imagine compact fusion reactors powering entire cities or even individual homes.
  • Space-Based Solar: Large-scale solar farms in orbit could beam energy back to Earth, providing a continuous and inexhaustible supply.
  • Advanced Geothermal: Enhanced geothermal systems could tap into the Earth’s heat with greater efficiency and in more locations, providing a stable and reliable energy source.  
  • Energy Harvesting: Tiny sensors and devices could harvest energy from their surroundings – movement, vibrations, even temperature differences – to power themselves and other systems.  

2. Carbon Management:

  • Atmospheric Carbon Removal: Technologies to efficiently remove CO2 from the atmosphere could be widely deployed, helping to reverse climate change and restore balance to the Earth’s systems.
  • Carbon-Negative Manufacturing: Industrial processes could be redesigned to use captured carbon as a raw material, creating products like plastics or fuels, effectively turning pollution into resources.

3. Resource Management:

  • Circular Economy: Highly efficient recycling and reuse systems could minimize waste and the need for virgin materials. Products could be designed for disassembly and material recovery, creating a truly circular flow of resources.  
  • Sustainable Materials: Advanced materials science could lead to the development of biodegradable or easily recyclable replacements for plastics and other problematic materials. We might see materials that can adapt to their environment or even self-heal.
  • Precision Agriculture: Technologies like vertical farms and AI-powered agriculture could optimize food production while minimizing land and water use. Food could be grown locally and tailored to individual needs, reducing waste and transportation costs.  

4. Urban Sustainability:

  • Smart Cities: Urban areas could be managed with AI and sensor networks to optimize energy use, transportation, and resource allocation. Buildings could adapt to weather conditions and occupant needs, and infrastructure could be self-monitoring and self-repairing.  
  • Green Infrastructure: Buildings could be designed to integrate with nature, incorporating green roofs, walls, and other features to improve energy efficiency and air quality. Cities could become lush and vibrant ecosystems, providing habitats for wildlife and improving the well-being of residents.
  • Personalized Transportation: Electric and autonomous vehicles could be integrated into efficient transportation networks, reducing congestion and emissions. Personal air mobility might also become a reality, allowing people to travel quickly and easily within cities.

5. Biotechnology:

  • Bio-manufacturing: Engineered organisms could be used to produce fuels, materials, and other products sustainably. We might see bio-factories that can create anything from biodegradable plastics to new types of medicines.  
  • Bioremediation: Biological processes could be used to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems. Microorganisms could be used to break down pollutants in soil or water, and engineered plants could be used to reforest degraded areas.

Important Considerations:

  • Technological Progress: The rate of technological advancement is unpredictable, so some of these developments might happen sooner or later than expected.
  • Societal Factors: The adoption of sustainable technologies will depend on economic, political, and social factors.
  • Unforeseen Innovations: There will likely be technological breakthroughs that we cannot even imagine today.

Overall, the future of sustainable technology looks promising. By 2400, we could have the tools and knowledge to create a truly sustainable civilization that lives in harmony with the planet.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2400 ?

It’s not a matter of who requires sustainable technology in 2400, but rather that its existence will be essential for the well-being and perhaps even the survival of humanity and the planet. Here’s a breakdown of why:

  • Environmental Necessity: By 2400, the cumulative effects of climate change and resource depletion may be severe. Sustainable technology will be crucial to mitigate these impacts, restore ecosystems, and ensure a habitable planet.
  • Resource Scarcity: As populations grow and resources become scarcer, sustainable technologies will be needed to optimize resource use, minimize waste, and create a circular economy.
  • Economic Stability: Sustainable technologies can drive innovation, create new industries, and foster economic growth while minimizing environmental impact.  
  • Social Equity: Sustainable solutions can help address issues like energy poverty, food insecurity, and access to clean water, promoting a more equitable and just society.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2400 will be a fundamental requirement for a thriving civilization. It will be integrated into every aspect of life, from energy production and transportation to manufacturing and agriculture.

Think of it this way:

  • Clean energy: Will be essential to power cities, industries, and homes without causing pollution or contributing to climate change.
  • Resource management: Will be critical to ensure that we use resources efficiently and minimize waste, preserving them for future generations.  
  • Environmental restoration: Will be necessary to repair the damage caused by past unsustainable practices and restore the health of ecosystems.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 2400 will be about creating a world where humanity can live in harmony with nature, ensuring a healthy planet and a prosperous future for all.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2400 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 2400 is not a question of “when,” but rather a recognition that its development and implementation are already required.

Here’s why:

  • Urgency of Current Challenges: The environmental challenges we face today, like climate change and resource depletion, are not going to magically disappear. In fact, they are likely to worsen if we don’t take action. The groundwork for sustainable technologies in 2400 needs to be laid now to avoid catastrophic consequences.
  • Long-Term Planning: Developing and implementing sustainable technologies is a long-term process. Research, innovation, infrastructure changes, and societal shifts take time. We need to be working on these solutions now to ensure they are ready when we need them most.  
  • Cumulative Effects: The impact of our actions today will have cumulative effects over time. The decisions we make now about energy, resource use, and environmental protection will shape the world of 2400. We need to be mindful of these long-term consequences and act responsibly.

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology in 2400 is a call to action for us today. We need to:

  • Invest in research and development: To create the innovative technologies that will be needed in the future.
  • Promote sustainable practices: To reduce our environmental impact now and pave the way for a more sustainable future.
  • Educate and engage: To raise awareness about the importance of sustainability and inspire action.

By taking these steps today, we can help ensure that sustainable technology is not just a futuristic concept, but a reality that benefits both present and future generations.

COURTESY : RBC

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2400 ?

You’re right to think about the “where” of sustainable technology in 2400! It won’t be confined to specific labs or power plants. Instead, it will be deeply integrated into every facet of human life and the environment. Here are some key areas where sustainable technology will be essential:

1. Urban Centers:

  • Buildings: Homes, offices, and public spaces will be designed for energy efficiency, using smart systems, renewable materials, and green infrastructure.
  • Transportation: Cities will have integrated networks of electric vehicles, autonomous systems, and potentially even personal air mobility, all powered by clean energy.
  • Infrastructure: Smart grids, water management systems, and waste recycling facilities will optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.

2. Rural Areas:

  • Agriculture: Precision farming, vertical farms, and sustainable land management practices will ensure food security while minimizing land and water use.
  • Energy: Rural communities might rely on localized renewable energy sources like solar, wind, or biogas, promoting energy independence.  
  • Resource Management: Sustainable forestry, water conservation, and ecosystem restoration will be crucial for preserving biodiversity and natural resources.

3. Industrial Sectors:

  • Manufacturing: Factories will adopt circular economy principles, using recycled materials, minimizing waste, and relying on carbon-neutral energy sources.
  • Resource Extraction: Mining and other resource extraction activities will need to be far more sustainable, minimizing environmental damage and prioritizing resource recovery.

4. Global Systems:

  • Energy Grids: International cooperation will be needed to develop and manage global-scale clean energy systems, potentially including space-based solar or advanced fusion reactors.
  • Climate Management: Technologies for atmospheric carbon removal and climate engineering might be deployed on a global scale to regulate the Earth’s climate.
  • Ocean Conservation: Sustainable fishing practices, pollution cleanup technologies, and ocean monitoring systems will be essential to protect marine ecosystems.

5. Personal Spaces:

  • Homes: Smart home systems will optimize energy use, manage resources, and even grow food locally.  
  • Devices: Personal devices will be powered by energy harvesting or highly efficient batteries, and designed for easy recycling and reuse.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2400 will be everywhere. It will be woven into the fabric of our lives, shaping the way we live, work, and interact with the planet. It will be a fundamental part of creating a truly sustainable and thriving civilization.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2400 ?

The “how” of requiring sustainable technology in 2400 is less about a single action and more about a continuous, evolving process that begins now. It’s not something we’ll suddenly “need” then; rather, it’s something we must actively cultivate and build towards over the coming centuries. Here’s a breakdown of how we get there:

1. Research and Development (R&D):

  • Fundamental Science: Investing in basic scientific research is crucial. We need to understand the fundamental principles of energy, materials science, biology, and other fields to develop truly innovative sustainable technologies.
  • Applied Research: Translating scientific discoveries into practical applications is essential. This involves developing prototypes, testing new technologies, and scaling up production.
  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Sustainable technology often requires expertise from multiple fields. Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, and social scientists is crucial.  

2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship:

  • Incentivizing Innovation: Governments, businesses, and other organizations need to create an environment that encourages innovation in sustainable technology. This can involve funding research, offering tax breaks, and creating prizes for breakthroughs.  
  • Supporting Startups: Startups are often at the forefront of innovation. Providing them with resources, mentorship, and access to markets can help them develop and commercialize sustainable technologies.  
  • Open Innovation: Sharing knowledge and collaborating across organizations can accelerate the development of sustainable solutions.  

3. Policy and Regulation:

  • Setting Standards: Governments need to establish standards for energy efficiency, emissions, and resource use to drive the adoption of sustainable technologies.  
  • Incentivizing Sustainable Practices: Policies like carbon pricing, renewable energy subsidies, and tax breaks for sustainable businesses can encourage the transition to a more sustainable economy.  
  • International Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change requires international cooperation on research, technology development, and policy.  

4. Education and Awareness:

  • Educating the Next Generation: Incorporating sustainability into education curricula at all levels is essential to create a workforce and citizenry that understands the importance of sustainable technology.  
  • Raising Public Awareness: Communicating the benefits of sustainable technology and engaging the public in the transition to a more sustainable future is crucial for building support and driving adoption.  

5. Investment and Infrastructure:

  • Investing in Infrastructure: Building the infrastructure needed to support sustainable technologies, such as smart grids, charging stations for electric vehicles, and recycling facilities, is essential.
  • Mobilizing Capital: Attracting investment in sustainable technology companies and projects is crucial for scaling up production and deployment.  

6. Societal Shifts and Behavior Change:

  • Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Encouraging consumers to adopt more sustainable lifestyles, such as reducing energy use, choosing eco-friendly products, and minimizing waste, is essential.
  • Creating a Culture of Sustainability: Fostering a culture that values sustainability and recognizes the importance of protecting the environment for future generations is crucial.

It’s important to remember that this is an ongoing process. The sustainable technologies of 2400 will build upon the innovations and progress we make today. It requires a long-term vision, sustained effort, and a commitment to creating a better future for all.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2400 ?

It’s difficult to create a case study for sustainable technology in 2400 because a case study typically examines something that has already happened. However, we can create a hypothetical case study, a plausible scenario based on current trends and future projections, to illustrate how such technologies might function and their impact.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Ganges Delta, 2400

Background: By the mid-22nd century, the Ganges Delta, once a fertile and densely populated region, faced severe challenges. Rising sea levels, exacerbated by climate change, had displaced millions. Salinization of farmland, pollution, and resource depletion further threatened the region’s viability.

The Solution: A multi-pronged approach, driven by advancements in sustainable technology, led to the delta’s revitalization by 2400:

  • Floating Cities and Coastal Defenses: Advanced materials science allowed for the construction of resilient, self-sustaining floating cities and integrated coastal defense systems. These structures, powered by a combination of tidal energy and localized solar farms, provided safe and sustainable housing for displaced populations.
  • Salinity Remediation and Regenerative Agriculture: Nanotechnology-based sensors and bioremediation techniques were deployed to monitor and restore soil health. Genetically engineered crops, adapted to saline conditions and requiring minimal water, were introduced, revitalizing agriculture and ensuring food security.
  • Water Purification and Management: Atmospheric water capture technology, combined with advanced filtration systems powered by renewable energy, provided access to clean and abundant freshwater. Smart irrigation systems, guided by AI and sensor networks, optimized water use for agriculture.
  • Waste Recycling and Resource Recovery: Highly efficient recycling and resource recovery facilities, powered by bio-energy and advanced material processing technologies, minimized waste and created a circular economy. Bioplastics, derived from agricultural waste, replaced traditional plastics.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Bioremediation and ecological engineering techniques were used to restore mangrove forests and other critical ecosystems. These efforts provided natural coastal protection, enhanced biodiversity, and supported sustainable aquaculture.

Outcomes:

  • Resilient Communities: The floating cities and restored coastal regions provided safe and sustainable homes for millions, fostering thriving communities.
  • Food Security: Regenerative agriculture and sustainable aquaculture ensured food security for the region’s population.
  • Environmental Restoration: The revitalization of ecosystems, including mangrove forests and wetlands, improved biodiversity and enhanced natural coastal defenses.
  • Economic Growth: The development and deployment of sustainable technologies created new industries and jobs, driving economic growth in the region.
  • Improved Quality of Life: Access to clean water, sanitation, and sustainable energy significantly improved the quality of life for residents.

Lessons Learned:

  • Integrated Approach: The success of the Ganges Delta revitalization demonstrates the importance of an integrated approach to sustainable development, addressing multiple challenges simultaneously.
  • Technological Innovation: Advancements in sustainable technology, from materials science to biotechnology, played a crucial role in providing solutions to complex problems.
  • Community Engagement: The involvement of local communities in the planning and implementation of solutions was essential for ensuring their long-term sustainability.
  • Long-Term Vision: The revitalization of the Ganges Delta highlights the importance of a long-term vision and sustained effort in addressing environmental challenges.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology in 2400 could be instrumental in solving complex environmental and social problems, creating a more resilient and sustainable future. It’s a vision we need to start working towards today.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2400 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2400: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Executive Summary:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2400. It acknowledges the inherent uncertainties of predicting the future but leverages current trends and scientific advancements to paint a plausible vision. The core premise is that sustainable technology will not be a niche area but rather the foundational fabric of civilization, deeply integrated into every aspect of human life and environmental stewardship. This paper outlines potential key technological advancements, their applications, and the societal shifts required to achieve this vision.

1. Introduction: The Imperative for Sustainability

The 21st century faces unprecedented environmental challenges, including climate change, resource depletion, and biodiversity loss. The choices we make today will profoundly impact the world of 2400. This paper assumes that by then, humanity will have recognized the existential importance of sustainability and embraced a paradigm shift towards a circular economy, renewable energy, and ecological harmony.

2. Key Technological Domains:

  • 2.1. Energy:
    • Fusion Power: Practical and scalable fusion energy will likely be a primary energy source, providing clean, abundant, and safe power.
    • Space-Based Solar: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit could beam clean energy to Earth, supplementing terrestrial sources.
    • Advanced Geothermal: Enhanced geothermal systems will tap into the Earth’s heat with greater efficiency and broader applicability.
    • Ambient Energy Harvesting: Micro- and nano-scale devices will harvest energy from the environment (vibrations, temperature gradients, etc.) to power small devices and sensor networks.
  • 2.2. Resource Management:
    • Circular Economy: Closed-loop systems will minimize waste. Products will be designed for disassembly and material reuse, virtually eliminating landfills.
    • Sustainable Materials: Bioplastics, advanced composites, and self-healing materials will replace traditional plastics and other environmentally problematic substances.
    • Precision Resource Extraction: Advanced sensing and AI will optimize resource extraction, minimizing environmental impact and maximizing resource recovery.
  • 2.3. Environmental Remediation:
    • Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Large-scale carbon capture and sequestration technologies will actively remove CO2 from the atmosphere.
    • Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Autonomous systems and bioremediation techniques will restore ocean health and biodiversity.
    • Ecosystem Restoration: Ecological engineering and advanced monitoring will aid in the restoration of damaged ecosystems.
  • 2.4. Biotechnology and Bio-manufacturing:
    • Bio-based Production: Engineered organisms will produce fuels, materials, and pharmaceuticals sustainably.
    • Bioremediation: Biological processes will clean up pollution and restore contaminated environments.
    • Sustainable Agriculture: Genetically enhanced crops, vertical farms, and precision agriculture will optimize food production while minimizing resource use.
  • 2.5. Information and Communication Technologies (ICT):
    • Smart Infrastructure: AI-powered systems will manage energy grids, transportation networks, and resource allocation in real-time.
    • Global Sensor Networks: Vast networks of sensors will monitor environmental conditions, providing critical data for decision-making.
    • Digital Twins: Virtual models of complex systems will allow for simulation and optimization of sustainable solutions.

3. Societal Transformations:

  • Sustainable Urbanization: Cities will be designed for walkability, green spaces, and efficient resource use.
  • Decentralized Systems: Local energy generation, food production, and resource management will enhance resilience and reduce reliance on centralized systems.
  • Global Cooperation: International collaboration on research, technology development, and policy will be essential for addressing global challenges.
  • Ethical Considerations: Careful consideration of the ethical implications of advanced technologies will be crucial to ensure equitable and responsible development.

4. Challenges and Opportunities:

  • Technological Hurdles: Significant scientific and engineering challenges remain in developing and scaling up many of these technologies.
  • Economic Transition: Shifting to a sustainable economy will require significant investments and potentially disruptive changes to existing industries.
  • Social Acceptance: Public awareness and engagement will be crucial for fostering the adoption of sustainable technologies and practices.

5. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 2400 is not merely a futuristic fantasy but a plausible and necessary pathway for humanity. By investing in research, fostering innovation, and embracing a global commitment to sustainability, we can create a world where technology and nature coexist in harmony, ensuring a thriving future for generations to come. The journey begins now.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2400 ?

Let’s explore some hypothetical industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2400, building upon the trends we’ve discussed:

1. Manufacturing:

  • Circular Manufacturing: Factories will operate on closed-loop systems. Products will be designed for disassembly and material reuse. Advanced robotics and AI will automate the sorting and reprocessing of materials, minimizing waste and maximizing resource recovery. Imagine a factory that takes in used products and outputs new ones, with minimal input of virgin materials.  
  • Carbon-Negative Production: Industrial processes will utilize captured CO2 as a feedstock to create new materials, fuels, and other products. Factories might “grow” materials using bio-manufacturing, essentially turning pollution into resources.
  • Localized Production: 3D printing and additive manufacturing will enable localized production of goods, reducing transportation costs and emissions. Factories could be highly adaptable, producing a wide range of products on demand.  
  • Sustainable Materials: Industries will rely on bio-based plastics, advanced composites, and other sustainable materials that are either biodegradable or easily recyclable. Materials might even be “grown” rather than manufactured in traditional ways.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

  • Fusion-Powered Industries: Fusion reactors will provide clean and abundant energy to power industrial processes, eliminating the need for fossil fuels. Imagine energy-intensive industries like aluminum smelting or steel production powered by compact fusion reactors.
  • Smart Grids: AI-powered smart grids will optimize energy distribution and minimize losses. Industries will be able to dynamically adjust their energy consumption based on grid availability and pricing.  
  • Energy Storage: Advanced battery technologies and other energy storage solutions will ensure a stable and reliable energy supply for industries, even when renewable energy sources fluctuate.  

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

  • Sustainable Mining: Advanced robotics and AI will enable more precise and less invasive mining operations. Resource extraction will focus on maximizing resource recovery and minimizing environmental impact. Mines might be largely automated and remotely operated.  
  • In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): For industries operating in space or on other planets, ISRU will be essential. Technologies will be developed to extract and process resources from the local environment, reducing the need to transport materials from Earth.
  • Advanced Recycling: Highly efficient recycling facilities will recover valuable materials from waste streams, reducing the demand for virgin resources. Recycling will be a highly automated and sophisticated process, capable of separating and reprocessing materials at the molecular level.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

  • Vertical Farms: Vertical farms will be integrated into urban areas and industrial complexes, providing fresh produce locally and reducing transportation costs. These farms will use minimal land and water, and be powered by renewable energy.  
  • Precision Agriculture: AI and sensor networks will optimize crop yields and minimize resource use in traditional agriculture. Fields will be monitored and managed with incredible precision, reducing waste and maximizing productivity.  
  • Sustainable Aquaculture: Advanced aquaculture systems will provide a sustainable source of seafood, reducing pressure on wild fish stocks. These systems will be integrated with other industrial processes, such as waste recycling and energy production.

5. Transportation and Logistics:

  • Autonomous Fleets: Autonomous vehicles will be used to transport goods between factories, warehouses, and distribution centers, improving efficiency and reducing emissions. Logistics will be highly automated and optimized.
  • Hyperloop and Maglev: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloop or maglev trains will enable rapid and efficient movement of goods and people over long distances.
  • Sustainable Aviation: Bio-fuels and other sustainable aviation fuels will power air travel, minimizing its environmental impact.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could transform industries in 2400. The key takeaway is that sustainability will not be an afterthought but rather a core principle driving innovation and shaping industrial practices. It will be an era where economic growth and environmental stewardship go hand in hand.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2400 ?

Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology in 2400 isn’t about waiting until then to start. It’s a continuous process that’s happening now and will accelerate over the coming centuries. Here’s a look at the kind of R&D efforts that will be crucial:

1. Fundamental Science:

  • Advanced Materials Science: Discovering and developing new materials with specific properties (superconductivity, high strength-to-weight ratio, biodegradability, etc.) is crucial. This includes research into nanomaterials, metamaterials, and bio-inspired materials.
  • Energy Physics: Furthering our understanding of fusion energy, exploring alternative energy sources (like zero-point energy, though highly speculative), and improving energy conversion and storage technologies are essential.
  • Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology: Research into how biological systems work, genetic engineering, and synthetic biology will be key to developing bio-manufacturing processes, bioremediation techniques, and sustainable agriculture.
  • Climate Science: Improving our understanding of climate systems, including the complex interactions between the atmosphere, oceans, and land, will be essential for developing effective climate mitigation and adaptation strategies.

2. Applied Research and Engineering:

  • Fusion Reactor Design: Developing practical and scalable fusion reactors is a major engineering challenge that requires ongoing research in plasma physics, materials science, and other fields.  
  • Space-Based Solar Technology: Designing and deploying large-scale solar arrays in orbit and efficiently beaming energy back to Earth requires significant advancements in space technology, materials science, and power transmission.  
  • Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Developing efficient and cost-effective methods for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere and safely storing it will require research in chemistry, materials science, and geological engineering.  
  • Advanced Recycling Technologies: Developing highly efficient and automated systems for recycling and resource recovery will require research in materials science, robotics, and AI.  
  • Bio-manufacturing and Bioremediation: Engineering microorganisms for specific tasks, such as producing biofuels or cleaning up pollution, requires expertise in synthetic biology, genetic engineering, and bioprocess engineering.  
  • AI and Smart Systems: Developing advanced AI algorithms and sensor networks will be crucial for managing complex systems like smart grids, transportation networks, and resource allocation.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

  • Integrating Disciplines: Sustainable technology solutions often require expertise from multiple fields. Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, social scientists, and policymakers is crucial.  
  • Systems Thinking: Adopting a systems thinking approach is essential for understanding the complex interconnections between different technologies and their impact on society and the environment.

4. Societal and Ethical Considerations:

  • Technology Assessment: Careful assessment of the potential social, environmental, and ethical implications of new technologies is essential for responsible development.
  • Public Engagement: Engaging the public in discussions about the future of sustainable technology is crucial for building support and ensuring that these technologies are used in a way that benefits everyone.

5. Long-Term Vision and Investment:

  • Sustained Funding: Significant and sustained investment in research and development is essential for achieving breakthroughs in sustainable technology.
  • Global Collaboration: International collaboration on research and development can accelerate progress and avoid duplication of effort.  
  • Foresight and Roadmapping: Developing long-term visions and technology roadmaps can help guide research efforts and ensure that they are aligned with societal needs and environmental goals.

It’s important to remember that the R&D for sustainable technology in 2400 is an ongoing process. The discoveries and innovations we make today will lay the foundation for the technologies of the future. By investing in research, fostering collaboration, and considering the ethical implications of our work, we can help ensure a sustainable and prosperous future for all.Sources and related content

courtesy : Tech Evaluate

References

  1. ^ Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (1993). “The Setting”. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton University Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-691-08631-1. JSTOR j.ctt7rpm1. I find the most useful conceptual definition for this study to be that given by Harvey Brooks, who has defined technology …as ‘knowledge of how to fulfill certain human purposes in a specifiable and reproducible way.’
  2. ^ Salomon 1984, pp. 117–118: “The first pole, that of the naturalisation of a new discipline within the university curriculum, was presented by Christian Wolff in 1728, in Chapter III of the “Preliminary discourse” to his Philosophia rationalisis sive Logica: ‘Technology is the science of skills and works of skill, or, if one prefers, the science of things made by man’s labour, chiefly through the use of his hands.'”
  3. ^ Mitcham, Carl (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-53196-1.
  4. ^ Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1996) [1891]. Greek-English Lexicon (Abridged ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-910205-8. OCLC 38307662.
  5. ^ Simpson, J.; Weiner, Edmund, eds. (1989). “technology”. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198611868.
  6. ^ Aristotle (2009). Brown, Lesley (ed.). The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford World’s Classics. Translated by Ross, David. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-19-921361-0. LCCN 2009005379. OCLC 246896490.
  7. ^ Salomon 1984, pp. 114–115.
  8. ^ Salomon 1984, p. 117.
  9. ^ Schatzberg, Eric (2006). “”Technik” Comes to America: Changing Meanings of “Technology” before 1930″. Technology and Culture. 47 (3): 486–512. doi:10.1353/tech.2006.0201. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 40061169. S2CID 143784033. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  10. ^ Salomon 1984, p. 119: “With the industrial revolution and the important part England played in it, the word technology was to lose this meaning as the subject or thrust of a branch of education, as first in English and then in other languages it embodied all technical activity based on the application of science to practical ends.”
  11. ^ Schiffer, M. B. (2013). “Discovery Processes: Trial Models”. The Archaeology of Science. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. Vol. 9. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. pp. 185–198. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00077-0_13. ISBN 978-3319000770. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  12. ^ The British Museum. “Our earliest technology?”. smarthistory.org. Archived from the original on 2 September 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
  13. ^ Minogue, K. (28 October 2010). “Stone Age Toolmakers Surprisingly Sophisticated”. science.org. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  14. ^ Crump, Thomas (2001). A Brief History of Science. Constable & Robinson. p. 9. ISBN 978-1841192352.
  15. ^ Gowlett, J. A. J.; Wrangham, R. W. (1 March 2013). “Earliest fire in Africa: towards the convergence of archaeological evidence and the cooking hypothesis”. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa. 48 (1): 5–30. doi:10.1080/0067270X.2012.756754. ISSN 0067-270X. S2CID 163033909.
  16. ^ Stahl, Ann B. (1984). “Hominid dietary selection before fire”. Current Anthropology. 25 (2): 151–68. doi:10.1086/203106. JSTOR 2742818. S2CID 84337150.
  17. ^ Wrangham, R. (1 August 2017). “Control of Fire in the Paleolithic: Evaluating the Cooking Hypothesis”. Current Anthropology. 58 (S16): S303 – S313. doi:10.1086/692113. ISSN 0011-3204. S2CID 148798286. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  18. ^ Dunbar, R. I. M.; Gamble, C.; Gowlett, J. A. J., eds. (2014). Lucy to Language: the Benchmark Papers. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199652594. OCLC 1124046527. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  19. ^ Wade, Nicholas (15 July 2003). “Early Voices: The Leap to Language”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Shaar, Ron; Matmon, Ari; Horwitz, Liora K.; Ebert, Yael; Chazan, Michael; Arnold, M.; Aumaître, G.; Bourlès, D.; Keddadouche, K. (1 May 2021). “Magnetostratigraphy and cosmogenic dating of Wonderwerk Cave: New constraints for the chronology of the South African Earlier Stone Age”. Quaternary Science Reviews. 259: 106907. Bibcode:2021QSRv..25906907S. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106907. ISSN 0277-3791. S2CID 234833092.
  21. ^ Hallett, Emily Y.; Marean, Curtis W.; Steele, Teresa E.; Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban; Jacobs, Zenobia; Cerasoni, Jacopo Niccolò; Aldeias, Vera; Scerri, Eleanor M. L.; Olszewski, Deborah I.; Hajraoui, Mohamed Abdeljalil El; Dibble, Harold L. (24 September 2021). “A worked bone assemblage from 120,000–90,000 year old deposits at Contrebandiers Cave, Atlantic Coast, Morocco”. iScience. 24 (9): 102988. Bibcode:2021iSci…24j2988H. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102988. ISSN 2589-0042. PMC 8478944. PMID 34622180.
  22. ^ O’Neil, Dennis. “Evolution of Modern Humans: Archaic Homo sapiens Culture”. Palomar College. Archived from the original on 4 April 2007. Retrieved 31 March 2007.
  23. ^ Villa, Paola (1983). Terra Amata and the Middle Pleistocene archaeological record of southern France. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 303. ISBN 978-0520096622.
  24. ^ Cordaux, Richard; Stoneking, Mark (2003). “South Asia, the Andamanese, and the Genetic Evidence for an ‘Early’ Human Dispersal out of Africa” (PDF). American Journal of Human Genetics. 72 (6): 1586–1590, author reply 1590–93. doi:10.1086/375407. PMC 1180321. PMID 12817589. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2009. Retrieved 22 May 2007.
  25. ^ “‘Oldest remains’ outside Africa reset human migration clock”. phys.org. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  26. ^ Harvati, Katerina; Röding, Carolin; Bosman, Abel M.; Karakostis, Fotios A.; Grün, Rainer; Stringer, Chris; Karkanas, Panagiotis; Thompson, Nicholas C.; Koutoulidis, Vassilis; Moulopoulos, Lia A.; Gorgoulis, Vassilis G.; Kouloukoussa, Mirsini (2019). “Apidima Cave fossils provide earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in Eurasia”. Nature. 571 (7766). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 500–504. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1376-z. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 31292546. S2CID 195873640. Archived from the original on 1 August 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  27. ^ Kuijt, i., ed. (2002). Life in Neolithic Farming Communities: Social Organization, Identity, and Differentiation. Fundamental Issues in Archaeology. Springer New York. ISBN 9780306471667. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  28. ^ Coghlan, H. H. (1943). “The Evolution of the Axe from Prehistoric to Roman Times”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 73 (1/2): 27–56. doi:10.2307/2844356. ISSN 0307-3114. JSTOR 2844356. Archived from the original on 26 September 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  29. ^ Driscoll, Killian (2006). The early prehistory in the west of Ireland: Investigations into the social archaeology of the Mesolithic, west of the Shannon, Ireland. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  30. ^ University of Chicago Press Journals (4 January 2006). “The First Baby Boom: Skeletal Evidence Shows Abrupt Worldwide Increase In Birth Rate During Neolithic Period”. ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  31. ^ Sussman, Robert W.; Hall, Roberta L. (April 1972). “Child Transport, Family Size, and Increase in Human Population During the Neolithic”. Current Anthropology. 13 (2): 258–267. doi:10.1086/201274. JSTOR 2740977. S2CID 143449170.
  32. ^ Ferraro, Gary P. (2006). Cultural Anthropology: An Applied Perspective. The Thomson Corporation. ISBN 978-0495030393. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
  33. ^ Patterson, Gordon M. (1992). The Essentials of Ancient History. Research & Education Association. ISBN 978-0878917044. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
  34. ^ Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge University Press.
  35. ^ Cramb, Alan W (1964). “A Short History of Metals”. Nature. 203 (4943): 337. Bibcode:1964Natur.203Q.337T. doi:10.1038/203337a0. S2CID 382712.
  36. ^ Hall, Harry Reginald Holland (1911). “Ceramics” . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 05 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 703–760, see page 708. The art of making a pottery consisting of a siliceous sandy body coated with a vitreous copper glaze seems to have been known unexpectedly early, possibly even as early as the period immediately preceding the Ist Dynasty (4000 B.C.).
  37. ^ Akanuma, Hideo. “The significance of the composition of excavated iron fragments taken from Stratum III at the site of Kaman-Kalehöyük, Turkey”. Anatolian Archaeological Studies. 14. Tokyo: Japanese Institute of Anatolian Archaeology.
  38. ^ “Ironware piece unearthed from Turkey found to be oldest steel”. The Hindu. 26 March 2009. Archived from the original on 29 March 2009. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  39. ^ Usai, Donatella; Salvatori, Sandro. “The oldest representation of a Nile boat”. Antiquity. 81.
  40. ^ Postel, Sandra (1999). “Egypt’s Nile Valley Basin Irrigation”. Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last?. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393319378. Archived from the original on 19 November 2020. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
  41. ^ Crawford, Harriet (2013). The Sumerian World. New York & London: Routledge. pp. 34–43. ISBN 978-0203096604. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  42. ^ Potts, D.T. (2012). A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. p. 285.
  43. ^ Childe, V. Gordon (1928). New Light on the Most Ancient East. p. 110.
  44. ^ Anthony, David A. (2007). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0691058870.
  45. ^ Gasser, Aleksander (March 2003). “World’s Oldest Wheel Found in Slovenia”. Republic of Slovenia Government Communication Office. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  46. ^ Kramer, Samuel Noah (1963). The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 290. ISBN 978-0226452388. Archived from the original on 8 August 2014. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  47. ^ Jump up to:a b Moorey, Peter Roger Stuart (1999) [1994]. Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries: The Archaeological Evidence. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. p. 146. ISBN 978-1575060422. Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  48. ^ Jump up to:a b Lay, M G (1992). Ways of the World. Sydney: Primavera Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-1875368051.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Gregersen, Erik (2012). The Complete History of Wheeled Transportation: From Cars and Trucks to Buses and Bikes. New York: Britannica Educational Publishing. p. 130. ISBN 978-1615307012. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Aicher, Peter J. (1995). Guide to the Aqueducts of Ancient Rome. Wauconda, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Inc. p. 6. ISBN 978-0865162822. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c Eslamian, Saeid (2014). Handbook of Engineering Hydrology: Environmental Hydrology and Water Management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. pp. 171–175. ISBN 978-1466552500. Archived from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  52. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Lechner, Norbert (2012). Plumbing, Electricity, Acoustics: Sustainable Design Methods for Architecture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 106. ISBN 978-1118014752. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
  53. ^ Davids, K.; De Munck, B., eds. (2019). Innovation and Creativity in Late Medieval and Early Modern European Cities. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315588605. ISBN 978-1317116530. S2CID 148764971. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  54. ^ Courtenay, W. J.; Miethke, J.; Priest, D. B., eds. (2000). Universities and Schooling in Medieval Society. BRILL. ISBN 978-9004113510. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  55. ^ Deming, D. (2014). Science and Technology in World History, Volume 3: The Black Death, the Renaissance, the Reformation and the Scientific Revolution. McFarland. ISBN 978-0786490868.
  56. ^ Stearns, P. N. (2020). The Industrial Revolution in World History. Routledge. ISBN 978-0813347295.
  57. ^ Mokyr, J. (2000). “The Second Industrial Revolution, 1870–1914” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  58. ^ Black, B. C. (2022). To Have and Have Not: Energy in World History. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1538105047. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  59. ^ Albion, Robert G. (1 January 1933). “The Communication Revolution, 1760–1933”. Transactions of the Newcomen Society. 14 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1179/tns.1933.002. ISSN 0372-0187. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  60. ^ Agar, J. (2012). Science in the 20th Century and Beyond. Polity. ISBN 978-0745634692. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  61. ^ Goldin, C.; Katz, L. F. (2010). The Race between Education and Technology. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674037731. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  62. ^ Solow, Robert M. (1957). “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 39 (3): 312–320. doi:10.2307/1926047. ISSN 0034-6535. JSTOR 1926047. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 15 January 2023.
  63. ^ Bresnahan, Timothy F.; Trajtenberg, M. (1 January 1995). “General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?”. Journal of Econometrics. 65 (1): 83–108. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T. ISSN 0304-4076.
  64. ^ Wrigley, E. A (13 March 2013). “Energy and the English Industrial Revolution”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 371 (1986): 20110568. Bibcode:2013RSPTA.37110568W. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0568. PMID 23359739. S2CID 10624423.
  65. ^ Persily, Nathaniel; Tucker, Joshua A., eds. (2020). Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform. SSRC Anxieties of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108890960. hdl:11245.1/cf2f5b6a-8dc8-4400-bc38-3317b0164499. ISBN 978-1108835558. S2CID 243715477. Archived from the original on 19 October 2022. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
  66. ^ Autor, D. H. (2015). “Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace”. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 29 (3): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3. hdl:1721.1/109476. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022.
  67. ^ Bessen, J. E. (3 October 2016). “How Computer Automation Affects Occupations: Technology, Jobs, and Skills”. Economic Perspectives on Employment & Labor Law EJournal. 15–49. Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2690435. S2CID 29968989. SSRN 2690435. Archived from the original on 10 March 2024. Retrieved 20 January 2024.
  68. ^ “Robots and Artificial Intelligence”. igmchicago.org. Initiative on Global Markets. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  69. ^ “The Future of Jobs Report 2020” (PDF). www3.weforum.org. October 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
  70. ^ “Robots and AI Taking Over Jobs: What to Know | Built In”. builtin.com. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  71. ^ “How many jobs do robots really replace?”. MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 4 May 2020. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  72. ^ Acemoglu, Daron; Restrepo, Pascual (1 June 2020). “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets”. Journal of Political Economy. 128 (6): 2188–2244. doi:10.1086/705716. hdl:1721.1/130324. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 7468879. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  73. ^ “Remarks Upon Signing Bill Creating the National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress. | The American Presidency Project”. www.presidency.ucsb.edu. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  74. ^ “Technology and the American Economy” (PDF). files.eric.ed.gov. February 1966. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  75. ^ “If Robots Take Our Jobs, Will They Make It Up to Us?”. The University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Archived from the original on 25 March 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  76. ^ “GovInfo”. www.govinfo.gov n. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  77. ^ “H.R.11611 – An Act to establish a National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress”. www.congress.gov. 1963. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  78. ^ Jump up to:a b Rosenberg, Elizabeth; Harrell, Peter E.; Shiffman, Gary M.; Dorshimer, Sam (2019). “Financial Technology and National Security”. Center for a New American Security. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  79. ^ “U.S. takes aim at North Korean crypto laundering”. NBC News. 6 May 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  80. ^ “U.S. ties North Korean hacker group to Axie Infinity crypto theft”. NBC News. 15 April 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  81. ^ Austin, David; Macauley, Molly K. (1 December 2001). “Cutting Through Environmental Issues: Technology as a double-edged sword”. Brookings. Archived from the original on 9 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
  82. ^ Grainger, Alan; Francisco, Herminia A.; Tiraswat, Penporn (July 2003). “The impact of changes in agricultural technology on long-term trends in deforestation”. The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use. 20 (3): 209–223. Bibcode:2003LUPol..20..209G. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00009-7. Archived from the original on 10 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  83. ^ EPA (19 January 2017). “Climate Impacts on Ecosystems”. Archived from the original on 27 January 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2019. Mountain and arctic ecosystems and species are particularly sensitive to climate change… As ocean temperatures warm and the acidity of the ocean increases, bleaching and coral die-offs are likely to become more frequent.
  84. ^ Union of Concerned Scientists (6 November 2017). “What is Climate Engineering?”. www.ucsusa.org. Retrieved 28 October 2024.
  85. ^ Chaudhry, Imran Sharif; Ali, Sajid; Bhatti, Shaukat Hussain; Anser, Muhammad Khalid; Khan, Ahmad Imran; Nazar, Raima (October 2021). “Dynamic common correlated effects of technological innovations and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from East-Asia and Pacific countries”. Environmental Science & Policy. 124 (Environmental Science & Policy): 313–323. Bibcode:2021ESPol.124..313C. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.007. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023. Retrieved 14 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  86. ^ Smol, J. P. (2009). Pollution of Lakes and Rivers : a Paleoenvironmental Perspective (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. p. 135. ISBN 978-1444307573. OCLC 476272945. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
  87. ^ Jump up to:a b Franssen, M.; Lokhorst, G.-J.; van de Poel, I. (2018). “Philosophy of Technology”. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  88. ^ Jump up to:a b de Vries, M. J.; Verkerk, M. J.; Hoogland, J.; van der Stoep, J. (2015). Philosophy of Technology : An Introduction for Technology and Business Students. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1317445715. OCLC 907132694. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  89. ^ Brey, P. (2000). Mitcham, C. (ed.). “Theories of Technology as Extension of Human Faculties”. Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology. 19.
  90. ^ Jump up to:a b Johnson, Deborah G.; Wetmore, Jameson M. (2021). Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262539968. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
  91. ^ Dusek, Val (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Wiley. ISBN 978-1405111621. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  92. ^ Postman, Neil (1993). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage.
  93. ^ Marcuse, H. (2004). Technology, War and Fascism: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, Volume 1. Routledge. ISBN 978-1134774661. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  94. ^ Hansson, Sven Ove (2017). The Ethics of Technology: Methods and Approaches. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1783486595. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  95. ^ Al-Rodhan, Nayef. “The Many Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 8 April 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2019.
  96. ^ Luppicini, R. (2008). “The emerging field of Technoethics”. In Luppicini; R. Adell (eds.). Handbook of Research on Technoethics. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
  97. ^ Veruggio, Gianmarco (2011). “The Roboethics Roadmap”. EURON Roboethics Atelier. Scuola di Robotica: 2. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.466.2810.
  98. ^ Anderson, Michael; Anderson, Susan Leigh, eds. (2011). Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521112352.
  99. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Bell, W. Foundations of Futures Studies, Volume 1: Human Science for a New Era. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1412823791. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  100. ^ “About us”. cser.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 30 December 2017. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  101. ^ Gottlieb, J. (1 May 2022). “Discounting, Buck-Passing, and Existential Risk Mitigation: The Case of Space Colonization”. Space Policy. 60: 101486. Bibcode:2022SpPol..6001486G. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101486. ISSN 0265-9646. S2CID 247718992.
  102. ^ “Stanford Existential Risks Initiative”. cisac.fsi.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 4 October 2022.
  103. ^ Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. (2011). Global Catastrophic Risks. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0199606504. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  104. ^ Jump up to:a b Bostrom, Nick (6 September 2019). “The Vulnerable World Hypothesis”. Global Policy. 10 (4): 455–476. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12718. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 203169705.
  105. ^ Kurzweil, Ray (2005). “GNR: Three Overlapping Revolutions”. The Singularity is Near. Penguin. ISBN 978-1101218884.
  106. ^ Kompridis, N. (2009). “Technology’s challenge to democracy: What of the human” (PDF). Parrhesia. 8 (1): 20–33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  107. ^ McShane, Sveta (19 April 2016). “Ray Kurzweil Predicts Three Technologies Will Define Our Future”. Singularity Hub. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  108. ^ Poole, C. P. Jr.; Owens, F. J. (2003). Introduction to Nanotechnology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0471079354.
  109. ^ Vince, G. (3 July 2003). “Nanotechnology may create new organs”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  110. ^ Lee, Sukhan; Suh, Il Hong (2008). Recent Progress in Robotics: Viable Robotic Service to Human: An Edition of the Selected Papers from the 13th International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 3. ISBN 978-3540767282. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  111. ^ Grace, K.; Salvatier, J.; Dafoe, A.; Zhang, B.; Evans, O. (31 July 2018). “Viewpoint: When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts”. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 62: 729–754. doi:10.1613/jair.1.11222. ISSN 1076-9757. S2CID 8746462. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  112. ^ Segal, H. P. (2005). Technological Utopianism in American Culture (20th Anniversary ed.). Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0815630616. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  113. ^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Roots and Core Themes”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part1. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  114. ^ Istvan, Zoltan (1 February 2015). “A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging”. Interalia Magazine. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  115. ^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Future Trajectories: Singularity”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 361–363. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part8. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  116. ^ Blackford, R.; Bostrom, N.; Dupuy, J.-P. (2011). H±: Transhumanism and Its Critics. Metanexus Institute. ISBN 978-1456815653. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  117. ^ Jones, Steven E. (2013). Against Technology: From the Luddites to Neo-Luddism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1135522391. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  118. ^ Kelman, David (1 June 2020). “Politics in a Small Room: Subterranean Babel in Piglia’s El camino de Ida”. The Yearbook of Comparative Literature. 63: 179–201. doi:10.3138/ycl.63.005. ISSN 0084-3695. S2CID 220494877. Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  119. ^ Fleming, Sean (7 May 2021). “The Unabomber and the origins of anti-tech radicalism”. Journal of Political Ideologies. 27 (2): 207–225. doi:10.1080/13569317.2021.1921940. ISSN 1356-9317.
  120. ^ Vannini, Phillip; Jonathan Taggart (2013). “Voluntary simplicity, involuntary complexities, and the pull of remove: The radical ruralities of off-grid lifestyles”. Environment and Planning A. 45 (2): 295–311. Bibcode:2013EnPlA..45..295V. doi:10.1068/a4564. S2CID 143970611.
  121. ^ Jump up to:a b Scranton, Philip (1 May 2006). “Urgency, uncertainty, and innovation: Building jet engines in postwar America”. Management & Organizational History. 1 (2): 127–157. doi:10.1177/1744935906064096. ISSN 1744-9359. S2CID 143813033.
  122. ^ Di Nucci Pearce, M. R.; Pearce, David (1989). “Technology vs. Science: The Cognitive Fallacy”. Synthese. 81 (3): 405–419. doi:10.1007/BF00869324. ISSN 0039-7857. JSTOR 20116729. S2CID 46975083. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  123. ^ Skolimowski, Henryk (1966). “The Structure of Thinking in Technology”. Technology and Culture. 7 (3): 371–383. doi:10.2307/3101935. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 3101935.
  124. ^ Brooks, H. (1 September 1994). “The relationship between science and technology”. Research Policy. Special Issue in Honor of Nathan Rosenberg. 23 (5): 477–486. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01001-3. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  125. ^ Jump up to:a b c Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2012). Antifragile. Penguin Random House. OCLC 1252833169.
  126. ^ Hare, Ronald (1970). The Birth of Penicillin, and the Disarming of Microbes. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0049250055. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  127. ^ Wise, George (1985). “Science and Technology”. Osiris. 2nd Series. 1: 229–46. doi:10.1086/368647. S2CID 144475553.
  128. ^ Guston, David H. (2000). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521653183.
  129. ^ Taleb, N. N. (12 December 2012). “Understanding is a Poor Substitute for Convexity (Antifragility)” (PDF). fooledbyrandomness.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 June 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  130. ^ Narin, Francis; Olivastro, Dominic (1 June 1992). “Status report: Linkage between technology and science”. Research Policy. 21 (3): 237–249. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(92)90018-Y. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  131. ^ Krieger, Joshua L.; Schnitzer, Monika; Watzinger, Martin (1 May 2019). “Standing on the Shoulders of Science” (PDF). SSRN 3401853. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  132. ^ Oakley, K. P. (1976). “Man the Tool-Maker”. Nature. 199 (4898): 1042–1043. Bibcode:1963Natur.199U1042.. doi:10.1038/1991042e0. ISBN 978-0226612706. S2CID 4298952.
  133. ^ Sagan, Carl; Druyan, Ann; Leakey, Richard. “Chimpanzee Tool Use”. Archived from the original on 21 September 2006. Retrieved 13 February 2007.
  134. ^ Rincon, Paul (7 June 2005). “Sponging dolphins learn from mum”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 4 December 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  135. ^ Schmid, Randolph E. (4 October 2007). “Crows use tools to find food”. NBC News. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  136. ^ Rutz, C.; Bluff, L.A.; Weir, A.A.S.; Kacelnik, A. (4 October 2007). “Video cameras on wild birds”. Science. 318 (5851): 765. Bibcode:2007Sci…318..765R. doi:10.1126/science.1146788. PMID 17916693. S2CID 28785984.
  137. ^ McGrew, W. C (1992). Chimpanzee Material Culture. Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0521423717.
  138. ^ Boesch, Christophe; Boesch, Hedwige (1984). “Mental map in wild chimpanzees: An analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking”. Primates. 25 (2): 160–170. doi:10.1007/BF02382388. S2CID 24073884.
  139. ^ Brahic, Catherine (15 January 2009). “Nut-cracking monkeys find the right tool for the job”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 15 November 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  140. ^ Müller, G.; Watling, J. (24 June 2016). The engineering in beaver dams. River Flow 2016: Eighth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics. St. Louis: University of Southampton Institutional Research Repository. Archived from the original on 24 September 2022. Retrieved 29 September 2022.
  141. ^ Thomas Michaud (2008). “Science fiction and politics: Cyberpunk science fiction as political philosophy”. New Boundaries in Political Science Fiction. By Hassler, Donald M. University of South Carolina Press. pp. 65–77 [75–76]. ISBN 978-1570037368.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »