Sustainable Technology of 2390

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 2390 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, here are some potential sustainable technologies that might exist in 2390, based on current trends and advancements:

1. Advanced Renewable Energy Systems

Space-based solar power: Large-scale solar farms in orbit could collect solar energy and beam it back to Earth, providing a clean and continuous energy source.
Fusion power: If nuclear fusion becomes a viable energy source, it could provide abundant, clean, and safe energy.
Enhanced geothermal energy: Advanced techniques could tap into deeper and hotter geothermal resources, providing a stable and reliable energy supply.
Smart grids: Highly sophisticated smart grids could optimize energy distribution and storage, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.

2. Closed-Loop Resource Systems

Circular economy: Advanced recycling and material recovery technologies could enable a truly circular economy, where resources are continuously reused and waste is minimized.
Biomanufacturing: Engineered biological systems could produce materials and products on demand, reducing reliance on traditional manufacturing processes and minimizing waste.
Vertical farming: Multi-story vertical farms in urban areas could produce food locally, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.
Water purification: Highly efficient and affordable water purification technologies could ensure access to clean water for all.

3. Sustainable Transportation

Flying cars: Electric or hydrogen-powered flying cars could revolutionize personal transportation, reducing traffic congestion and emissions.
Hyperloop: High-speed hyperloop systems could transport people and goods across long distances quickly and efficiently.
Autonomous vehicles: Self-driving vehicles could optimize traffic flow and reduce accidents, while electric or hydrogen-powered engines would minimize emissions.
Advanced battery technology: High-capacity, long-lasting batteries could make electric vehicles more practical and affordable.

4. Green Infrastructure

Self-healing materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be made from self-healing materials that repair themselves, reducing maintenance costs and extending their lifespan.
Carbon capture and storage: Advanced technologies could capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it underground, mitigating climate change.
Green cities: Cities could be designed with green spaces, vertical farms, and renewable energy systems, creating sustainable and livable urban environments.

5. Smart Technology

Artificial intelligence: AI could be used to optimize energy use, manage resources, and improve efficiency in various sectors.
Internet of Things: A network of interconnected devices could monitor and manage energy use, water consumption, and other resources in real-time.
Nanotechnology: Advanced materials and devices at the nanoscale could be used for various applications, such as energy storage, water purification, and environmental remediation.

These are just a few potential sustainable technologies that might exist in 2390. The future is full of possibilities, and it’s exciting to imagine the innovative solutions that could be developed to create a more sustainable world.

You stopped this response

What is Sustainable Technology of 2390 ?

It’s exciting to speculate about the sustainable technologies that might exist in 2390! Here are some possibilities, building on current trends and potential breakthroughs:

1. Energy:

Space-based Solar Power: Massive solar farms orbiting Earth could collect sunlight continuously and beam energy back to the surface, providing clean, abundant power.
Fusion Power: If nuclear fusion becomes commercially viable, it could offer a safe, clean, and virtually limitless energy source.
Advanced Geothermal: Enhanced geothermal systems could tap into deeper, hotter resources, providing stable, baseload renewable energy.
Global Smart Grid: A highly sophisticated, interconnected grid could optimize energy distribution, storage, and use, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.

2. Resource Management:

Circular Economy: Advanced recycling and material recovery technologies could create a true circular economy, where resources are continuously reused and waste is virtually eliminated.
Biomanufacturing: Engineered biological systems could produce materials, fuels, and products on demand, reducing reliance on traditional manufacturing and minimizing environmental impact.
Vertical Farming: Multi-story, high-tech farms in urban areas could produce food locally, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.
Atmospheric Water Generation: Advanced systems could efficiently extract potable water from the atmosphere, addressing water scarcity issues.

3. Transportation:

Flying Personal Vehicles: Electric or hydrogen-powered flying cars could revolutionize personal transportation, reducing traffic congestion and emissions.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems could transport people and goods across vast distances quickly and efficiently.
Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles, powered by clean energy sources, could optimize traffic flow, reduce accidents, and minimize emissions.
Advanced Battery Technology: High-capacity, long-lasting, and sustainable batteries could make electric vehicles more practical and affordable.

4. Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be made from materials that can repair themselves, reducing maintenance costs and extending lifespan.
Carbon Capture and Storage: Advanced technologies could capture CO2 from the atmosphere and store it safely underground, mitigating climate change.
Green Cities: Cities could be designed with green spaces, vertical farms, and renewable energy systems, creating sustainable and livable urban environments.

5. Smart Technology:

Artificial Intelligence: AI could optimize energy use, manage resources, and improve efficiency in various sectors.
Internet of Things: A vast network of interconnected devices could monitor and manage energy, water, and other resources in real-time.
Nanotechnology: Advanced materials and devices at the nanoscale could be used for energy storage, water purification, environmental remediation, and more.

Important Considerations:

Global Collaboration: Developing and implementing these technologies would require unprecedented international cooperation.
Ethical Considerations: It’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of advanced technologies like AI and genetic engineering.
Accessibility: Sustainable technologies should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.

It’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, but these are some potential sustainable technologies that could exist in 2390. The future is full of possibilities, and it’s exciting to imagine the innovative solutions that could be developed to create a more sustainable world.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2390 ?

It’s fascinating to think about who would need sustainable technology in 2390! Here’s a breakdown of potential beneficiaries:

Humanity as a whole: This is the most obvious answer. Everyone on Earth would rely on sustainable technologies for basic needs like energy, food, water, and shelter. These technologies would be essential for maintaining a high quality of life while minimizing environmental impact.
Future generations: Sustainable technologies are inherently designed to protect the planet’s resources for those who come after us. By minimizing pollution, conserving resources, and mitigating climate change, we ensure a habitable world for future generations.
Ecosystems and biodiversity: Sustainable technologies would play a crucial role in preserving and restoring natural ecosystems. This includes protecting endangered species, reducing pollution in oceans and forests, and maintaining the delicate balance of our planet’s biodiversity.
Developing nations: Sustainable technologies can help bridge the gap between developed and developing nations. Affordable and accessible clean energy, water purification, and sustainable agriculture can improve living standards and promote economic growth in less developed regions.
Space exploration and colonization: As humanity ventures further into space, sustainable technologies will become even more critical. Closed-loop life support systems, in-situ resource utilization, and sustainable energy sources will be essential for long-term space missions and establishing off-world settlements.
Industries and businesses: In 2390, sustainability would likely be deeply integrated into all aspects of industry and business. Companies that adopt sustainable practices would not only reduce their environmental footprint but also gain a competitive edge by minimizing resource costs and appealing to environmentally conscious consumers.

It’s important to remember that the need for sustainable technology is not limited to any particular group or region. It’s a global imperative that affects everyone on Earth. By embracing sustainable solutions, we can create a more equitable, prosperous, and environmentally healthy world for all.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2390 ?

It’s not just about when sustainable technology will be needed in 2390, but rather that it will be an ongoing and essential requirement. Here’s why:

Continuous Resource Management: Even with advanced technology, resources are finite. Sustainable practices will be crucial to manage those resources efficiently, ensuring their availability for future generations. This means constantly refining recycling systems, optimizing energy use, and minimizing waste.
Dynamic Environment: The Earth’s environment is constantly changing. Climate change, natural disasters, and evolving ecosystems will require ongoing adaptation and innovation in sustainable technologies to maintain a habitable planet.
Evolving Needs: As societies and technologies advance, new needs and challenges will emerge. Sustainable solutions will be necessary to address these evolving needs in an environmentally responsible way. This could involve developing new materials, finding innovative ways to produce food, or adapting to changing climate conditions.
Maintaining Balance: Sustainable technology isn’t a one-time fix; it’s about maintaining a delicate balance between human needs and the health of the planet. This requires constant monitoring, evaluation, and improvement of sustainable practices to ensure long-term ecological balance.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2390 won’t be a static set of solutions, but rather a dynamic and evolving field that adapts to the changing needs of humanity and the planet. It will be an integral part of everyday life, ensuring a healthy and prosperous future for all.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2390 ?

Sustainable technology in 2390 will be required everywhere. It won’t be confined to specific locations but integrated into all aspects of life and infrastructure. Here’s a breakdown:

Urban Centers: Cities, as hubs of population and industry, will be prime locations for sustainable technologies. This includes vertical farms, efficient public transportation systems, smart grids, green buildings, and advanced waste management facilities.
Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, renewable energy generation, and efficient water management will be crucial in rural areas. This ensures food security, protects natural resources, and supports sustainable livelihoods.
Remote Locations: Sustainable technologies will be essential for communities in remote or isolated areas, where access to resources and infrastructure may be limited. This includes off-grid renewable energy systems, localized water purification, and sustainable resource management.
Space: As humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will become even more critical. Space stations, lunar bases, and Martian colonies will require closed-loop life support systems, in-situ resource utilization, and sustainable energy sources.
Oceans: Sustainable technologies will be needed to protect and manage our oceans, including sustainable fishing practices, ocean cleanup technologies, and renewable energy generation from ocean currents or waves.
Atmosphere: Technologies for carbon capture, air purification, and climate change mitigation will be essential to maintain a healthy atmosphere.
Underground: Sustainable practices will be needed for resource extraction, underground transportation, and even potential underground habitats.

In short, sustainable technology in 2390 will be a global necessity, integrated into every environment and aspect of human activity. It won’t be a question of where it’s needed, but rather how it’s implemented and adapted to the specific challenges and opportunities of each location.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2390 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just about having sustainable technology in 2390, but how it’s integrated and utilized. Here are some key aspects:

Holistic Integration: Sustainable technology won’t be separate systems but deeply woven into the fabric of society. This means buildings that generate their own energy, transportation networks that seamlessly blend with green spaces, and industries that operate on closed-loop resource systems.
Adaptive and Responsive: Technology will need to be highly adaptable to changing environmental conditions, resource availability, and societal needs. This requires advanced monitoring systems, AI-powered optimization, and flexible infrastructure.
Decentralized Systems: While large-scale projects like space-based solar power might exist, there will also be a strong emphasis on decentralized systems. This means communities and even individuals having the means to generate their own energy, grow food locally, and manage their own resources.
Human-Centered Design: Sustainable technology will need to be designed with people in mind, ensuring it’s user-friendly, accessible, and equitable. This means considering the social and economic impacts of technology, and prioritizing solutions that benefit everyone.
Continuous Innovation: Sustainable technology in 2390 won’t be static. It will require ongoing research, development, and innovation to address new challenges and improve existing systems. This means investing in education, fostering collaboration, and embracing a culture of continuous improvement.
Resilience and Redundancy: Systems will need to be resilient to natural disasters, technological failures, and other disruptions. This means building in redundancy, diversifying energy sources, and having backup plans in place.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 2390 will be about creating a harmonious relationship between humanity and the planet. It will be a dynamic and evolving field that prioritizes ecological balance, social equity, and long-term well-being.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2390 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific “case study” for sustainable technology in 2390, as that’s far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical case study based on trends and possibilities:

Case Study: The Integrated Eco-City of “Aurora”

Background: By 2390, many coastal cities are struggling with rising sea levels and extreme weather. Aurora is a newly designed city, built on higher ground and incorporating cutting-edge sustainable technologies.

Key Features:

Energy: Aurora is powered by a combination of space-based solar energy beamed to the city, and enhanced geothermal energy tapped from deep underground. Buildings are energy-positive, generating more energy than they consume, thanks to advanced solar panels and smart energy management systems.
Food: Vertical farms integrated into skyscrapers provide fresh produce for residents, reducing reliance on long-distance transportation. Advanced hydroponics and aquaculture systems maximize food production while minimizing water use.
Water: Atmospheric water generators extract potable water from the air, supplemented by highly efficient rainwater harvesting systems. Wastewater is treated and recycled for irrigation and non-potable uses.
Transportation: Aurora is a pedestrian-friendly city with a network of electric autonomous vehicles and flying personal vehicles for longer distances. A high-speed hyperloop connects Aurora to other cities.
Waste Management: Aurora operates on a closed-loop system. Advanced recycling and biomanufacturing technologies ensure that nearly all waste is reused or repurposed.
Housing: Buildings are constructed from self-healing materials and incorporate green spaces, vertical gardens, and rooftop farms. AI-powered systems optimize building performance and resource use.

Challenges:

Initial Investment: Building Aurora required significant upfront investment in research, development, and infrastructure.
Technological Integration: Integrating various sustainable technologies into a cohesive system posed a major challenge.
Social Equity: Ensuring that all residents have equal access to the benefits of sustainable technology is crucial.
Environmental Adaptation: Aurora must remain adaptable to future climate change impacts and evolving environmental conditions.

Outcomes:

Reduced Environmental Impact: Aurora has a minimal carbon footprint and significantly reduces its impact on the planet’s resources.
Improved Quality of Life: Residents enjoy clean air, access to fresh food and water, and a high quality of life.
Economic Growth: Aurora’s focus on sustainable technology has created new industries and jobs.
Resilience: Aurora is better equipped to withstand environmental challenges and adapt to future changes.

Lessons Learned:

Holistic Approach: Integrating various sustainable technologies is crucial for creating a truly sustainable city.
Long-Term Vision: Investing in sustainable technology requires a long-term perspective and commitment.
Collaboration: Collaboration between governments, businesses, and researchers is essential for developing and implementing sustainable solutions.
Social Considerations: Ensuring equity and accessibility is crucial for the success of sustainable technology.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology could be integrated into a future city to create a more environmentally friendly, resilient, and equitable society.

COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2390 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2390: A Vision for a Harmonious Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2390. Building upon current trends and anticipating future breakthroughs, it outlines key technological advancements across various sectors, emphasizing their interconnectedness and crucial role in ensuring a thriving and equitable future for humanity and the planet. It also addresses potential challenges and considerations for the development and implementation of these technologies.

1. Introduction:

The year 2390 represents a significant milestone in human history, a point where the choices we make today will have shaped the world for centuries to come. This paper posits that sustainable technology will be the cornerstone of civilization in 2390, not just an option but a necessity for survival and prosperity. It envisions a world where technological innovation is intrinsically linked to environmental stewardship and social well-being.

2. Key Technological Domains:

2.1 Energy:

Space-Based Solar Power (SBSP): Large-scale orbital solar farms collect solar energy continuously and beam it back to Earth, providing baseload power with minimal environmental impact.
Fusion Energy: Commercialized and refined, fusion power provides clean, safe, and abundant energy, effectively eliminating reliance on fossil fuels.
Advanced Geothermal: Enhanced geothermal systems tap into deep, high-temperature resources, providing stable and geographically diverse renewable energy.
Global Smart Grid: A highly intelligent, interconnected grid optimizes energy generation, distribution, and storage, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.

2.2 Resource Management:

Circular Economy: Advanced material science and recycling technologies enable a near-perfect closed-loop system, where resources are continuously reused and waste is minimized.
Biomanufacturing: Engineered biological systems produce materials, fuels, and pharmaceuticals on demand, reducing reliance on traditional manufacturing and minimizing environmental impact.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use, ensuring food security for a growing population.
Atmospheric Resource Capture: Technologies efficiently extract valuable resources from the atmosphere, including water, minerals, and even rare earth elements.

2.3 Transportation:

Advanced Electric Vehicles: High-capacity, long-lasting batteries and ubiquitous charging infrastructure make electric vehicles the dominant mode of transportation.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems connect cities and regions, enabling rapid and efficient movement of people and goods.
Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) Aircraft: Electric or hydrogen-powered VTOL aircraft provide efficient urban air mobility, reducing traffic congestion.
Sustainable Aviation Fuels: Advanced biofuels and synthetic fuels power long-distance air travel with minimal environmental impact.

2.4 Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure are constructed from materials that can repair themselves, reducing maintenance costs and extending lifespan.
Smart Cities: Urban environments are optimized for sustainability through integrated systems that manage energy, water, waste, and transportation.
Green Infrastructure: Cities incorporate green spaces, vertical farms, and other natural elements to enhance biodiversity and improve air quality.
Resilient Infrastructure: Infrastructure is designed to withstand extreme weather events and other environmental challenges.

2.5 Information and Communication Technology (ICT):

Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI plays a crucial role in optimizing resource use, managing complex systems, and driving innovation in sustainable technologies.
Internet of Things (IoT): A vast network of interconnected devices monitors and manages energy, water, and other resources in real-time.
Quantum Computing: Quantum computing enables breakthroughs in materials science, energy storage, and other fields critical to sustainable technology.

3. Challenges and Considerations:

Technological Development: Continued investment in research and development is essential to realize the full potential of these technologies.
Economic Viability: Ensuring the affordability and accessibility of sustainable technologies is crucial for widespread adoption.
Social Equity: Sustainable technology must be implemented in a way that benefits all of humanity, not just a privileged few.
Environmental Impacts: The potential environmental impacts of new technologies must be carefully assessed and mitigated.
Ethical Considerations: The ethical implications of advanced technologies like AI and biomanufacturing must be carefully considered.
Global Cooperation: International collaboration is essential to address global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity.

4. Conclusion:

The sustainable technologies envisioned for 2390 offer a pathway to a future where humanity can thrive in harmony with the planet. By embracing innovation, prioritizing sustainability, and working together, we can create a world where future generations inherit a healthy, prosperous, and equitable planet. This white paper serves as a call to action, urging continued research, development, and collaboration to realize this vision.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2390 ?

Let’s imagine some industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2390, building on the trends we’ve discussed:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

Biomanufacturing: Imagine factories that “grow” materials and products using engineered biological systems. This could revolutionize everything from textiles to construction materials, drastically reducing waste and reliance on fossil fuels. Customization would be at the molecular level, allowing for highly specialized products with minimal resource input.
Closed-Loop Systems: Factories operate on near-perfect closed-loop systems. Raw materials are sourced sustainably (perhaps even from recycled or upcycled materials), and waste is virtually eliminated. Every byproduct is either reused in the manufacturing process or converted into something else of value.
Additive Manufacturing (Advanced 3D Printing): 3D printing has evolved to the point where complex, customized products can be manufactured on demand, minimizing waste and optimizing material use. Imagine entire structures, machines, or even personalized medical implants being “printed” layer by layer.
AI-Optimized Production: AI controls and optimizes every stage of the manufacturing process, from design to production to distribution. This ensures maximum efficiency, minimizes energy consumption, and reduces the risk of errors or defects.

2. Energy & Resource Extraction:

Space-Based Resource Acquisition: For resources scarce on Earth, automated systems could mine asteroids or even other celestial bodies, bringing back valuable materials in a sustainable way. This could reduce the environmental impact of terrestrial mining.
Advanced Geothermal Energy: Industries requiring high temperatures (like certain manufacturing processes) might be powered by advanced geothermal systems, providing a clean and reliable source of heat.
Carbon Capture and Utilization: Industries that still produce some emissions (perhaps in specialized chemical processes) would utilize advanced carbon capture and utilization technologies. Captured CO2 would be converted into useful products, effectively closing the carbon cycle.

3. Construction & Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure are constructed from self-healing materials that automatically repair damage, reducing maintenance costs and extending lifespan. Imagine bridges or buildings that can repair cracks on their own.
Modular Construction: Buildings are constructed from modular components that can be easily reconfigured or repurposed. This allows for flexible and adaptable infrastructure that can evolve with changing needs.
Green Building Technologies: Buildings are designed to be energy-positive, generating more energy than they consume. They incorporate green spaces, vertical farms, and other sustainable features to minimize their environmental impact.

4. Transportation & Logistics:

Hyperloop Networks: Hyperloop systems connect factories and distribution centers, enabling rapid and efficient transport of goods. This reduces transportation costs and minimizes emissions.
Autonomous Logistics: Self-driving vehicles and drones manage the movement of goods within factories and across the supply chain, optimizing efficiency and reducing human error.
Sustainable Aviation Fuels: For industries that rely on air transport, sustainable aviation fuels derived from biofuels or synthetic fuels minimize the environmental impact of air travel.

5. Agriculture & Food Production:

Vertical Farms: Vertical farms integrated into industrial areas or even within factories produce fresh produce for local consumption, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use, ensuring sustainable food production.
Cellular Agriculture: Cultivated meat and other animal products are produced in labs, reducing the need for traditional animal agriculture and its associated environmental impacts.

These are just some examples of how sustainable technology could revolutionize industry in 2390. The key is that sustainability would be deeply integrated into every aspect of industrial activity, from resource extraction to manufacturing to transportation and logistics. This would create a more efficient, environmentally responsible, and equitable industrial system.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2390 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the kind of research and development (R&D) that would be driving sustainable technology in 2390! Here are some potential areas of focus:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

Self-healing materials: R&D would focus on creating materials with even greater self-healing capabilities, potentially incorporating nanotechnology to allow for repairs at the molecular level.
Bio-integrated materials: Imagine materials that can seamlessly integrate with living organisms, potentially for use in green infrastructure or even in biomanufacturing processes.
Adaptive materials: Materials that can change their properties in response to environmental stimuli, such as adjusting their insulation based on temperature or their structure based on load.
Sustainable resource extraction: Developing new methods for extracting valuable materials from the Earth’s crust or even from space, with minimal environmental impact.

2. Energy Technologies:

Fusion energy optimization: R&D would focus on improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of fusion power, making it a truly ubiquitous energy source.
Space-based solar power advancements: Research would explore ways to make space-based solar farms even larger and more efficient, perhaps using advanced robotics for construction and maintenance.
Energy storage breakthroughs: Developing new energy storage technologies that are more compact, durable, and have higher energy density, enabling better integration of renewable energy sources.
Quantum energy technologies: Exploring the potential of quantum phenomena for energy generation and storage, potentially leading to revolutionary new energy sources.

3. Biomanufacturing and Biotechnology:

Programmable biology: R&D would focus on making biomanufacturing processes more precise and programmable, allowing for the creation of complex materials and products with tailored properties.
Synthetic biology: Engineering new biological systems for specific purposes, such as producing biofuels, capturing carbon dioxide, or even creating new forms of life.
Bio-integrated systems: Developing technologies that seamlessly integrate biological systems with artificial ones, potentially for use in environmental monitoring or even in creating living infrastructure.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics:

AI for sustainability: Developing AI systems that can optimize resource use, manage complex systems, and predict environmental changes, helping to improve the efficiency and resilience of sustainable technologies.
Autonomous systems: Creating robots that can perform a wide range of tasks in a sustainable way, such as constructing and maintaining infrastructure, cleaning up pollution, or even managing ecosystems.
Human-AI collaboration: Exploring ways for humans and AI to work together effectively in the development and implementation of sustainable technologies.

5. Environmental Science and Ecology:

Ecosystem restoration: Researching new methods for restoring damaged ecosystems, such as forests, oceans, and wetlands, and making them more resilient to future challenges.
Climate change mitigation: Developing new technologies for capturing and storing carbon dioxide, as well as for mitigating the impacts of climate change.
Planetary health: Taking a holistic approach to research that considers the interconnectedness of human health, environmental health, and social well-being.

6. Social Sciences and Ethics:

Sustainable development: Researching the social and economic factors that influence the adoption of sustainable technologies, and developing strategies for promoting sustainable development.
Ethical considerations: Exploring the ethical implications of advanced technologies like AI and biotechnology, and developing guidelines for their responsible use.
Global collaboration: Fostering international collaboration in the development and implementation of sustainable technologies, ensuring that they benefit all of humanity.

These are just a few examples of the exciting areas of research and development that could be shaping sustainable technology in 2390. It’s important to remember that innovation is a continuous process, and the technologies of the future will likely be even more advanced and transformative than we can imagine today.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

^ “about”. www.csus.edu. Retrieved 2016-04-04.
^ “about”. www.csus.edu. Retrieved 2016-04-04.
^ “A Multi-Trophic Sustainable Food Production System Integrating Aquaponics and Bio-Waste Recycling| Research Project Database | NCER | ORD | US EPA”. cfpub.epa.gov. Retrieved 2016-05-08.
^ “Epicure Catering at Sacramento State”. www.dining.csus.edu. Retrieved 2016-05-08.
^ “Dining Commons”. www.dining.csus.edu. Retrieved 2016-05-08.
^ “A Multi-Trophic Sustainable Food Production System Integrating Aquaponics and Bio-Waste Recycling”. cfpub.epa.gov. Retrieved 2016-05-31.
^ “A Multi-Trophic Sustainable Food Production System Integrating Aquaponics and Bio-Waste Recycling| Research Project Database | NCER | ORD | US EPA”. cfpub.epa.gov. Retrieved 2016-05-08.
^ “aquaponics”. www.csus.edu. Retrieved 2016-04-04.
^ “Sac State Continues Tradition of a Green Campus” (Press release).
^ Biodiesel Benefits and Considerations
^ Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Comparison of the performance and emissions of different biodiesel blends against petroleum diesel
^ Vermiculture, STORC
^ “CORNELL Composting – Compost Microorganisms”. compost.css.cornell.edu. Retrieved 2016-05-09.
^ “How Composting Works”. HowStuffWorks. 2001-04-02. Retrieved 2016-05-09.
^ Moyle, Peter (2002). Inland Fishes of California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
^ Miller, Chris (2011). “Preliminary Report on Feed Trials of Sacramento Perch” (PDF). Fisheries Science.
^ Tilman, David; Balzer, Christian; Hill, Jason; Befort, Belinda L. (2011-12-13). “Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (50): 20260–20264. doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3250154. PMID 22106295.
Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.