Sustainable Technology of 2330

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 2330 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 2330 ?

Imagining sustainable technology in 2330 is a fascinating exercise! Here are some possibilities based on current trends and potential advancements:

Energy & Environment:

  • Advanced Fusion Power: Fusion energy, mimicking the sun’s power source, could be a primary energy source, providing clean and abundant energy.
  • Global-Scale Carbon Capture: Advanced technologies could efficiently capture and store or utilize carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, reversing climate change effects.
  • Hyper-Efficient Solar: Solar technology might achieve near-total energy conversion, with space-based solar farms beaming energy to Earth.
  • Self-Healing Materials: Infrastructure and devices could be made from materials that can repair themselves, increasing longevity and reducing waste.
  • Personalized Weather Control: Advanced weather modification technologies could help mitigate extreme weather events and optimize local climates.

Resources & Production:

  • Circular Economy 2.0: Manufacturing might operate on closed-loop systems, with every material endlessly recycled and reused, eliminating waste.
  • Lab-Grown Everything: Food, materials, and even organs could be grown in labs, reducing reliance on traditional agriculture and resource extraction.
  • 3D Printing Revolution: Advanced 3D printing could enable on-demand manufacturing of anything, from everyday items to complex machinery, at home or in local hubs.
  • Ocean Mining & Resource Extraction: Sustainable methods for extracting resources from the oceans could provide essential materials while minimizing environmental impact.

Information & Communication:

  • Neural Interfaces: Brain-computer interfaces could allow seamless interaction with technology and even direct communication with others.
  • Holographic Communication: Holographic projections could enable immersive, real-time communication and virtual meetings, regardless of location.
  • AI Assistants Everywhere: Highly advanced AI assistants could manage daily tasks, provide personalized education, and even help make complex decisions.
  • Global Digital Consciousness: The internet could evolve into a collective digital consciousness, enabling shared knowledge, creativity, and problem-solving.

Transportation & Infrastructure:

  • Flying Personal Vehicles: Air travel could be revolutionized by personal flying vehicles, enabling fast and efficient transportation within and between cities.
  • Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems could connect cities and regions, drastically reducing travel times.
  • Smart Cities: Urban centers could be fully integrated with technology, optimizing energy use, traffic flow, and resource management.
  • Underground Infrastructure: Advanced tunneling technologies could create

You stopped this response

What is Sustainable Technology of 2330

It’s impossible to say for certain what sustainable technology will look like in 2330. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments. Here are some possibilities:

  • Energy: Fusion power could be a major source of energy, providing clean and abundant power. Solar technology might be far more efficient than it is today, and we might even have space-based solar farms beaming energy to Earth.
  • Manufacturing: We could have a truly circular economy, where everything is recycled and reused endlessly. 3D printing might be advanced enough to allow us to create anything we need on demand, from everyday items to complex machinery.
  • Transportation: Flying cars might be a reality, and we could have hyperloop networks connecting cities at incredible speeds.
  • Healthcare: Personalized medicine could be the norm, with treatments tailored to an individual’s genetic makeup. We might even be able to grow new organs and tissues in labs, eliminating the need for transplants.
  • Communication: Brain-computer interfaces could allow us to interact with technology and communicate with each other telepathically. Holographic communication might make it possible to have immersive, real-time conversations with people anywhere in the world.

Of course, this is just speculation. The future of technology is constantly evolving, and it’s impossible to predict exactly what it will look like in over 300 years. However, it’s safe to say that sustainable technology will play a major role in shaping our world for the better.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2330 ?

In 2330, the need for sustainable technology will be universal, impacting every aspect of human life and society. Here’s a breakdown of who will require and benefit from it:

1. Individuals:

  • Daily Life: Sustainable tech will be integrated into homes, transportation, communication, and even personal health management, ensuring a comfortable and healthy lifestyle.
  • Resource Access: Individuals will rely on sustainable systems for food, water, and energy, ensuring equitable access and minimizing environmental impact.
  • Personal Choices: People will need to make informed choices about their consumption and lifestyle, supported by sustainable tech that provides information and options for eco-friendly living.

2. Communities & Societies:

  • Urban Planning: Cities will need sustainable infrastructure, transportation, and waste management systems to support growing populations and minimize environmental impact.
  • Resource Management: Communities will depend on sustainable agriculture, water management, and energy systems to ensure long-term resource availability.
  • Social Equity: Sustainable tech will be crucial for addressing social inequalities and ensuring that everyone has access to basic resources and opportunities.

3. Industries & Businesses:

  • Sustainable Production: Businesses will need to adopt circular economy models, using renewable energy, minimizing waste, and prioritizing ethical sourcing.
  • Innovation & Growth: Sustainable tech will drive innovation and create new economic opportunities in areas like renewable energy, green manufacturing, and environmental remediation.  
  • Corporate Responsibility: Companies will be held accountable for their environmental and social impact, with sustainable practices becoming essential for brand reputation and consumer trust.  

4. Governments & Institutions:

  • Policy & Regulation: Governments will need to create policies and regulations that promote sustainable development and incentivize the adoption of green technologies.  
  • Infrastructure Development: Public investments in sustainable infrastructure, like renewable energy grids and public transportation, will be crucial for long-term sustainability.
  • Global Cooperation: International collaboration will be essential for addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion, requiring shared technologies and sustainable practices.

5. The Planet & Ecosystems:

  • Environmental Protection: Sustainable tech will be essential for mitigating climate change, preserving biodiversity, and protecting ecosystems.
  • Resource Conservation: Sustainable practices will be crucial for ensuring the long-term availability of natural resources, like water, minerals, and forests.
  • Planetary Health: Ultimately, sustainable technology will be necessary for maintaining the health and resilience of the planet, ensuring a habitable environment for future generations.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2330 will be a fundamental requirement for human survival and well-being, impacting every individual, organization, and aspect of society. It will be the foundation for a thriving and equitable future, where human progress and environmental stewardship go hand in hand.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2330 ?

This is a fun thought experiment! Since we’re talking about the year 2330, the need for sustainable technology is already critical. Here’s why:

  • The Long-Term View: Sustainable technology isn’t about fixing problems in the moment; it’s about building systems that can last for centuries. By 2330, any unsustainable practices we continue today will have compounded into potentially catastrophic consequences.
  • Resource Depletion: Even with current technology, we’re depleting resources at an alarming rate. In 300+ years, many key resources could be exhausted if we don’t have sustainable alternatives in place.  
  • Environmental Damage: Climate change, pollution, and ecosystem destruction are ongoing crises. By 2330, these issues will be far more severe if we don’t have advanced sustainable technologies to reverse the damage and prevent further harm.  
  • Population Growth: The global population is projected to increase significantly in the coming centuries. Sustainable technology will be essential to provide for everyone without overburdening the planet’s resources.

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology in 2330 is being created NOW. The decisions we make today, the technologies we develop, and the practices we adopt will determine whether sustainable solutions are in place when that future arrives.

It’s like planting a tree: you plant it today not just for your own shade, but for the generations to come. Similarly, we need to invest in sustainable technology now to ensure a habitable and thriving world for those living in 2330 and beyond.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Financial Times

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2330 ?

Sustainable technology in 2330, while needing global implementation, will be particularly crucial in the following areas:

  • Urban Centers: Mega-cities and urban areas will be hubs of both population and technological advancement. Sustainable solutions for energy, waste management, transportation, and resource allocation will be essential for these densely populated regions to function efficiently and minimize their environmental footprint. Think vertical farms, smart grids, and advanced recycling facilities.
  • Developing Nations: Access to sustainable technology will be vital for developing nations to progress without replicating the environmentally damaging practices of the past. This includes access to clean water, renewable energy, and sustainable agriculture.
  • Remote and Isolated Communities: Sustainable technology will be key for self-sufficiency in remote areas. This could involve off-grid renewable energy systems, localized food production, and closed-loop resource management.
  • Extreme Environments: As human presence expands into more challenging environments (deserts, polar regions, even space), sustainable technologies will be necessary for survival and minimizing impact on fragile ecosystems.
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Sectors: Sustainable practices in these sectors will be critical for reducing pollution, conserving resources, and shifting towards a circular economy. This includes everything from sustainable materials to closed-loop manufacturing processes.  
  • Agricultural and Food Production: Sustainable agriculture will be essential to feed a growing population without depleting soil health, water resources, or biodiversity. This could involve vertical farming, precision agriculture, and lab-grown food technologies.  
  • Transportation Networks: Sustainable transportation systems, from high-speed rail to personal air vehicles, will be necessary to move people and goods efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.
  • Global Infrastructure: Sustainable technology will be required for managing global resources like water and energy, as well as addressing global challenges like climate change through geoengineering or large-scale carbon capture projects.
  • Homes and Personal Spaces: Sustainable technologies will be integrated into everyday life, from smart home energy management systems to personal devices that monitor health and environmental impact.

In short, while the need for sustainable technology will be global, its implementation will be tailored to the specific challenges and opportunities presented by different locations and sectors.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2330 ?

It’s not just what sustainable technology will exist in 2330, but how it will be integrated into society that matters. Here’s how sustainable technology will likely be required in 2330:

1. Seamless Integration:

  • Embedded Systems: Sustainable tech won’t be separate gadgets, but woven into the fabric of daily life. Homes, buildings, infrastructure, and even clothing could have embedded sensors, energy systems, and recycling mechanisms.
  • Autonomous Operation: Many systems will likely be self-regulating and require minimal human intervention. Think smart grids that automatically balance energy supply and demand, or waste management systems that sort and process materials without human input.
  • Personalized & Adaptive: Technology will adapt to individual needs and preferences, optimizing energy use, resource consumption, and even personal health. Imagine clothing that adjusts its insulation based on your body temperature and the weather.

2. Closed-Loop Systems:

  • Circular Economy: Manufacturing will operate on closed loops, with every material endlessly recycled and reused. Products might be designed for disassembly and material recovery, eliminating waste.  
  • Resource Regeneration: Technologies could exist to regenerate resources like water and soil nutrients, ensuring their long-term availability.
  • Carbon Neutrality: Energy systems will likely be entirely carbon neutral, with advanced carbon capture and storage technologies potentially reversing past emissions.

3. Decentralized & Localized:

  • Distributed Energy: Energy generation might be decentralized, with homes and communities producing their own power through renewable sources.
  • Localized Production: 3D printing and advanced manufacturing could enable on-demand production of goods locally, reducing the need for long-distance transportation and centralized factories.  
  • Community-Based Solutions: Communities might have greater control over their resources and infrastructure, with sustainable technologies tailored to their specific needs and environments.

4. Intelligent & Adaptive:

  • AI-Driven Optimization: AI systems will likely play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, predicting potential problems, and adapting to changing conditions.  
  • Predictive Maintenance: Self-healing materials and AI-powered diagnostics could enable predictive maintenance, preventing infrastructure failures and extending the lifespan of devices.  
  • Environmental Monitoring: Advanced sensor networks and AI could provide real-time monitoring of environmental conditions, enabling proactive responses to pollution or ecosystem disruptions.  

5. Accessible & Equitable:

  • Universal Access: Sustainable technologies will need to be accessible and affordable for everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.
  • Social Equity: Sustainable development will need to address social inequalities and ensure that everyone benefits from technological advancements.
  • Global Cooperation: International collaboration will be essential for developing and sharing sustainable technologies, addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion.  

In essence, sustainable technology in 2330 will be deeply integrated, intelligent, and focused on creating a circular, equitable, and resilient society. It will be less about individual gadgets and more about creating interconnected systems that support both human well-being and planetary health.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2330 ?

It’s difficult to create a case study of sustainable technology in 2330 in the traditional sense, as we’re dealing with speculation. A case study usually examines something that has happened. However, we can create a hypothetical scenario that explores how sustainable technologies might function in that future. Think of it as a “future history” case study.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Ganges Delta, 2330

Context: By the early 22nd century, the Ganges Delta, a region vital to hundreds of millions, faced severe challenges. Rising sea levels, exacerbated by climate change, threatened to displace communities and inundate farmland. Pollution from industrial runoff and agricultural practices further degraded the ecosystem. Traditional methods of water management proved insufficient.

Sustainable Technology Solutions Implemented:

  • Advanced Seawalls & Coastal Defenses: Nanomaterial-reinforced seawalls, capable of self-repair and adaptation to changing sea levels, were constructed. These weren’t just barriers, but integrated systems incorporating tidal energy generation and aquaculture facilities.
  • Hydro-Regeneration Network: A network of advanced filtration and purification systems, powered by renewable energy, was established to revitalize the Ganges River and its tributaries. These systems removed pollutants, restored natural flow patterns, and even extracted valuable minerals from the wastewater.
  • Vertical Farming & Aquaponics: Land lost to rising sea levels was compensated for by the development of large-scale vertical farms and aquaponics facilities. These structures, powered by solar energy, provided food security for the region while minimizing land use and water consumption.
  • Smart Agriculture: Precision agriculture techniques, utilizing AI-powered sensors and drones, were implemented to optimize crop yields and reduce the need for fertilizers and pesticides. These techniques also helped restore soil health and prevent further degradation.
  • Eco-Restoration Projects: Large-scale reforestation and wetland restoration projects were undertaken to create natural buffers against storms and flooding, while also providing habitat for wildlife and sequestering carbon.
  • Decentralized Energy Systems: Communities transitioned to decentralized energy systems based on a mix of solar, wind, and biogas generation. This provided energy independence and resilience in the face of extreme weather events.

Outcomes:

  • Reduced Displacement: The advanced seawalls and land reclamation projects protected communities from rising sea levels, minimizing displacement and preserving cultural heritage.
  • Improved Water Quality: The hydro-regeneration network dramatically improved water quality in the Ganges River and its tributaries, restoring aquatic ecosystems and providing access to clean water for millions.
  • Food Security: Vertical farming and smart agriculture ensured food security for the region, even with reduced arable land.
  • Economic Growth: The transition to a sustainable economy created new jobs in green technology, renewable energy, and sustainable agriculture.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Reforestation and wetland restoration projects revitalized the region’s ecosystems, increasing biodiversity and providing natural protection against environmental hazards.

Conclusion:

This hypothetical case study demonstrates how a combination of advanced sustainable technologies could address complex environmental and social challenges in the future. It highlights the importance of integrated solutions, technological innovation, and a long-term perspective in creating a sustainable future for all. While speculative, it’s based on current technological trends and provides a glimpse into the potential of sustainable technology in 2330

.COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2330 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2330: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2330. Building upon current trends and extrapolating future advancements, it envisions a world where technology is seamlessly integrated with natural systems, fostering a circular economy, ensuring equitable access to resources, and mitigating the long-term effects of climate change. The paper examines potential breakthroughs in energy, resource management, manufacturing, transportation, communication, healthcare, and space exploration, highlighting the interconnectedness of these domains and the crucial role of global collaboration in achieving a sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The imperative for sustainable technology is more urgent than ever. As we look towards 2330, we must anticipate and prepare for the challenges of a changing climate, resource depletion, and a growing global population. This paper posits that by 2330, sustainable technology will be not just a desirable option, but the very foundation upon which human civilization thrives.

2. Energy & Environment:

  • Fusion Power Dominance: Advanced fusion reactors, mimicking the energy generation of the sun, will likely be the primary energy source, providing clean, abundant, and safe power.
  • Global Carbon Cycle Management: Sophisticated atmospheric carbon capture and utilization technologies will be deployed at a planetary scale, actively removing greenhouse gases and potentially reversing the effects of climate change.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit will capture sunlight unimpeded by weather or atmospheric interference, beaming clean energy to Earth.
  • Geoengineering Advancements: While used cautiously, advanced geoengineering techniques may be available to mitigate extreme weather events and manage global climate patterns.

3. Resources & Production:

  • Circular Economy 2.0: A truly circular economy will be the norm, with all materials perpetually recycled and reused. “Waste” as we understand it today will be a relic of the past.
  • Lab-Grown & 3D-Printed Everything: From food and materials to complex electronics and even biological organs, lab-grown and 3D-printed technologies will revolutionize manufacturing, reducing reliance on resource extraction and traditional agriculture.
  • Advanced Material Science: Self-healing materials, adaptive materials, and bio-integrated materials will be commonplace, enhancing the durability and sustainability of everything from infrastructure to personal devices.

4. Information & Communication:

  • Neural Interfaces & Augmented Reality: Brain-computer interfaces will allow seamless interaction with technology, while augmented reality overlays will provide instant information and immersive experiences.
  • Global Digital Consciousness: The internet may evolve into a more interconnected network, potentially resembling a global digital consciousness, facilitating shared knowledge, creativity, and problem-solving.
  • Holographic Communication: Real-time holographic projections will enable immersive communication, transcending geographical barriers and fostering global collaboration.

5. Transportation & Infrastructure:

  • Personal Air Mobility: Flying personal vehicles, powered by clean energy, will revolutionize urban transportation, reducing congestion and travel times.
  • Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems will connect cities and regions across continents, facilitating rapid and sustainable travel.
  • Smart Cities & Infrastructure: Urban centers will be fully integrated with sensor networks and AI, optimizing energy use, traffic flow, and resource management.

6. Healthcare & Biotechnology:

  • Personalized Medicine & Gene Editing: Genetic sequencing and gene editing technologies will enable highly personalized medicine, preventing and even curing genetic diseases.
  • Regenerative Medicine & Bioprinting: The ability to grow new organs and tissues on demand will revolutionize healthcare, eliminating the need for transplants and extending lifespans.
  • AI-Powered Diagnostics & Treatment: AI systems will assist in diagnosis, treatment planning, and drug discovery, leading to more effective and personalized healthcare.

7. Space Exploration & Colonization:

  • Sustainable Space Habitats: Self-sustaining space habitats and colonies will be established on the Moon, Mars, and beyond, utilizing in-situ resource utilization and closed-loop life support systems.
  • Advanced Propulsion Systems: Breakthroughs in propulsion technology will enable faster and more efficient space travel, facilitating exploration and colonization of the solar system and beyond.
  • Asteroid Mining & Resource Extraction: Sustainable methods for extracting resources from asteroids and other celestial bodies will provide essential materials for space-based industries and further expansion.

8. Global Collaboration & Ethical Considerations:

Achieving this vision of a sustainable future will require unprecedented global collaboration. International agreements on resource management, environmental protection, and ethical guidelines for technological development will be crucial. Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and addressing potential social and economic disruptions will be paramount.

9. Conclusion:

The year 2330 presents both challenges and opportunities. By embracing sustainable technology, fostering innovation, and prioritizing global cooperation, we can create a future where humanity thrives in harmony with the planet. This white paper serves as a call to action, urging us to invest in the research, development, and implementation of sustainable technologies today, ensuring a brighter tomorrow for generations to come.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2330 ?

You’re right to focus on the industrial applications! That’s where sustainable technology in 2330 will likely have the biggest impact. Here are some potential scenarios:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

  • Circular Factories: Imagine factories that operate on closed-loop systems. Raw materials enter, and finished products, along with any byproducts, are continuously recycled and reused. Advanced 3D printing and additive manufacturing would allow for on-demand production of complex goods, minimizing waste and optimizing material use.  
  • Energy-Independent Facilities: Factories would likely be powered by on-site renewable energy sources like solar, wind, or even localized fusion reactors. AI-powered systems would optimize energy consumption and production processes, ensuring maximum efficiency.  
  • Personalized Production: Mass customization would be the norm. AI and advanced robotics would allow for the creation of products tailored to individual needs and preferences, reducing waste from overproduction and unsold inventory.  

2. Resource Extraction & Processing:

  • Sustainable Mining: Mining operations would be transformed with autonomous robots and AI-powered systems that minimize environmental impact. Advanced techniques could extract resources from previously inaccessible locations, like deep-sea deposits or even asteroids, while minimizing waste and pollution.  
  • Resource Regeneration: Technologies could exist to regenerate resources like water, soil nutrients, and even certain minerals. This would reduce reliance on traditional extraction methods and create a more sustainable supply chain.
  • Pollution Remediation: Industrial processes would incorporate advanced pollution control systems, capturing and neutralizing harmful byproducts before they can impact the environment. Even past pollution could be addressed with technologies that actively clean up contaminated sites.

3. Agriculture & Food Production:

  • Vertical Farms & Controlled Environments: Large-scale vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture facilities would be common, producing food in urban areas and minimizing the need for land, water, and pesticides.
  • Precision Agriculture: AI-powered sensors and drones would monitor crops and soil conditions in real-time, optimizing irrigation, fertilization, and pest control. This would increase yields while minimizing environmental impact.  
  • Lab-Grown Food Production: Cultivated meat and other lab-grown food products would become more prevalent, reducing the need for traditional animal agriculture and its associated environmental footprint.

4. Infrastructure & Construction:

  • Self-Healing Infrastructure: Buildings and infrastructure would be constructed from self-healing materials that can repair damage automatically, extending their lifespan and reducing maintenance needs.
  • Adaptive Buildings: Buildings could adapt to changing weather conditions or occupancy needs, automatically adjusting insulation, ventilation, and energy use to optimize comfort and efficiency.
  • Modular Construction: Construction would rely on modular components that can be easily assembled, disassembled, and reused, reducing waste and enabling flexible adaptation to changing needs.  

5. Transportation & Logistics:

  • Autonomous Fleets: Industrial transportation would be dominated by autonomous vehicles, including trucks, ships, and even drones. AI-powered logistics systems would optimize routes and delivery schedules, minimizing fuel consumption and emissions.  
  • Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems could be used for transporting goods between cities and regions, providing a fast and sustainable alternative to traditional transportation methods.  
  • Sustainable Aviation: Air travel would rely on biofuels or other sustainable energy sources, minimizing the environmental impact of long-distance transportation.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could revolutionize industries in 2330. The key is that sustainability would be deeply integrated into every aspect of industrial activity, from resource extraction to manufacturing to transportation, creating a truly circular and environmentally responsible economy.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2330 ?

You’re asking a really interesting question! While we can’t predict the exact research paths that will lead to sustainable technology in 2330, we can imagine some key areas of focus based on current trends and future needs:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

  • Self-healing materials: Research into materials that can automatically repair damage will be crucial for creating long-lasting infrastructure and reducing waste.
  • Adaptive materials: Materials that can change their properties in response to environmental stimuli (temperature, light, pressure) could revolutionize everything from clothing to buildings.
  • Bio-integrated materials: Combining biological and synthetic materials could lead to breakthroughs in medicine, manufacturing, and even construction (imagine growing buildings!).
  • Super-efficient materials: Researching materials with near-zero energy loss for applications like energy transmission and storage will be critical for a sustainable energy future.

2. Energy Generation & Storage:

  • Fusion energy: Continued research into fusion power is essential for realizing its potential as a clean and abundant energy source.  
  • Advanced solar technologies: Developing solar cells with near-100% efficiency and exploring space-based solar power will be crucial for harnessing solar energy.
  • Next-generation batteries: Research into batteries with higher energy density, longer lifespans, and sustainable materials will be essential for storing renewable energy.
  • Energy harvesting: Technologies that can capture energy from the environment (vibrations, heat, motion) could provide power for small devices and sensors.  

3. Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning:

  • AI for optimization: Developing AI algorithms that can optimize energy use, resource allocation, and industrial processes will be crucial for maximizing efficiency.  
  • Predictive modeling: AI can be used to predict environmental changes, optimize resource management, and even prevent infrastructure failures.  
  • Autonomous systems: Research into robotics and AI will be essential for developing autonomous systems for manufacturing, agriculture, and even resource extraction.

4. Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering:

  • Synthetic biology: Engineering biological systems to produce biofuels, materials, and even food could revolutionize manufacturing and agriculture.
  • Gene editing: Continued research into gene editing technologies could lead to breakthroughs in medicine, agriculture, and even environmental remediation.
  • Bioremediation: Using biological systems to clean up pollution and restore ecosystems will be a crucial area of research for addressing environmental challenges.

5. Environmental Science & Geoengineering:

  • Climate modeling: Improving our understanding of climate systems and developing more accurate climate models will be essential for predicting and mitigating climate change.
  • Carbon capture & utilization: Researching efficient and cost-effective methods for capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and converting it into useful products will be crucial for reversing climate change.
  • Geoengineering: While potentially controversial, research into geoengineering techniques may be necessary for managing global climate patterns and mitigating extreme weather events.

6. Social Sciences & Sustainability:

  • Sustainable consumption: Researching human behavior and developing strategies for promoting sustainable consumption patterns will be essential for achieving a truly sustainable future.
  • Environmental economics: Developing economic models that account for the environmental costs of human activities will be crucial for creating a sustainable economy.
  • Global governance: Research into international cooperation and governance structures will be essential for addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion.

It’s important to remember that these areas of research are interconnected. Breakthroughs in one area could lead to advancements in others. For example, advances in materials science could enable the development of more efficient solar cells, while AI could be used to optimize the design of new materials.  

Ultimately, the research and development of sustainable technology in 2330 will require a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together scientists, engineers, social scientists, and policymakers to create a future where technology and nature work in harmony.Sources and related content

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b “The 17 Goals”. Sustainable Development Goals. UN. Retrieved 10 August 2022. Cite error: The named reference “the17SDGs” was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  2. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas; Sénit, Carole-Anne; Beisheim, Marianne; Bernstein, Steven; Chasek, Pamela; Grob, Leonie; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Kotzé, Louis J.; Nilsson, Måns; Ordóñez Llanos, Andrea; Okereke, Chukwumerije; Pradhan, Prajal; Raven, Rob; Sun, Yixian (20 June 2022). “Scientific evidence on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals”. Nature Sustainability. 5 (9): 795–800. Bibcode:2022NatSu…5..795B. doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00909-5. hdl:2066/253734. ISSN 2398-9629.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h van Driel, Melanie; Biermann, Frank; Vijge, Marjanneke J; Kim, Rakhyun E (2023). “How the World Bank Engages with the Sustainable Development Goal on Reducing Inequalities: A Case of Organizational Jiu-Jitsu”. Global Studies Quarterly. 3 (3). doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksad035. ISSN 2634-3797.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas; Sénit, Carole-Anne (2022), Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas; Sénit, Carole-Anne (eds.), “Assessing the Impact of Global Goals: Setting the Stage”, The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals (1 ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–21, doi:10.1017/9781009082945.002, ISBN 978-1-009-08294-5, retrieved 16 October 2024
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c Sénit, Carole-Anne; Okereke, Chukwumerije; Alcázar, Lorena; Banik, Dan; Lima, Mairon Bastos; Biermann, Frank; Fambasayi, Rongedzayi; Hathie, Ibrahima; Kronsell, Annica (2022), Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas; Sénit, Carole-Anne (eds.), “Chapter 5: Inclusiveness”, The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals (1 ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 116–139, doi:10.1017/9781009082945.006, ISBN 978-1-009-08294-5, retrieved 20 November 2024
  7. ^ Jump up to:a b United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  8. ^ Kim, Rakhyun E. (1 April 2023). “Augment the SDG indicator framework”. Environmental Science & Policy. 142: 62–67. Bibcode:2023ESPol.142…62K. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.004. ISSN 1462-9011. S2CID 256758145.
  9. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. Bibcode:2018npjCW…1….3B. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j Kim, Rakhyun E. (2023). “Augment the SDG indicator framework”. Environmental Science & Policy. 142: 62–67. Bibcode:2023ESPol.142…62K. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.004.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c “IAEG-SDGs – Tier Classification for Global SDG Indicators”. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  12. ^ “Leaving no one behind — SDG Indicators”. unstats.un.org. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
  13. ^ de Jong, Eileen; Vijge, Marjanneke J. (2021). “From Millennium to Sustainable Development Goals: Evolving discourses and their reflection in policy coherence for development”. Earth System Governance. 7: 100087. Bibcode:2021ESGov…700087D. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2020.100087.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  14. ^ Jump up to:a b “SDG Indicators – Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”. United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD). Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  15. ^ Jump up to:a b “IAEG-SDGs 2020 Comprehensive Review Proposals Submitted to the 51st session of the United Nations Statistical Commission for its consideration”. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 1 September 2020.
  16. ^ “SDG Indicator changes (15 October 2018 and onward) – current to 17 April 2020” (PDF). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division. 17 April 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  17. ^ Winfried, Huck (2019). Iovane, Massimo; Palombino, Fulvio; Amoroso, Daniele; Zarra, Giovanni (eds.). Measuring Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with Indicators: Is Legitimacy Lacking?. Oxford University Press. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3360935. S2CID 203377817. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  18. ^ “SDG Indicators, Data collection Information & Focal points”. unstats.un.org (Statistics Division). Retrieved 10 October 2024.
  19. ^ van Driel, Melanie; Biermann, Frank; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Vijge, Marjanneke J. (2022). “International organisations as ‘custodians’ of the sustainable development goals? Fragmentation and coordination in sustainability governance”. Global Policy. 13 (5): 669–682. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13114. ISSN 1758-5880. PMC 9796348. PMID 36590104.
  20. ^ “Goal 2: Zero hunger”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  22. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. Bibcode:2018npjCW…1….3B. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  23. ^ “Explained: What is zero-hunger which is a Sustainable Development Goal?”. News9live. 24 July 2023. Retrieved 31 July 2023.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b “Goal 3: Good health and well-being”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  25. ^ “Goal 3: Good health and well-being”. UNDP. Retrieved 26 August 2020.
  26. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Goal 4: Quality education”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 11 September 2018. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  27. ^ “Goal 5: Gender equality”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 27 February 2018. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  28. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n United Nations Economic and Social Council (2020) Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals Report of the Secretary-General Archived 30 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine, High-level political forum on sustainable development, convened under the auspices of the Economic and Social Council (E/2020/57), 28 April 2020
  29. ^ “Female genital mutilation”. www.unicef.org. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 27 August 2020.
  30. ^ Sustainable development goals report 2016. New York: United Nations. 2016. ISBN 978-92-1-101340-5. OCLC 959869696. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 27 August 2020.
  31. ^ “Goal 6 Targets”. United Nations Development Programme. Archived from the original on 19 February 2018. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  32. ^ WHO and UNICEF (2017) Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: 2017 Update and SDG Baselines Archived 25 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2017
  33. ^ “Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation”. UNDP. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  34. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  35. ^ “Goal 7: Affordable and clean energy”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  36. ^ IEA, IRENA, UNSD, WB, WHO (2019), Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report 2019 Archived 30 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Washington DC (on Tracking SDG 7 website Archived 30 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  37. ^ Jump up to:a b Ritchie, Roser, Mispy, Ortiz-Ospina (2018) “Measuring progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals.” (SDG 7) SDG-Tracker.org, website  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  38. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b “Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  40. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  41. ^ “Goal 9: Industry, innovation, infrastructure”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 1 March 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  42. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. Bibcode:2018npjCW…1….3B. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  43. ^ “Goal 10: Reduced inequalities”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  44. ^ United Nations (2020) Sustainable development goals report Archived 30 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine, New York
  45. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  46. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  47. ^ “Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 11 September 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  48. ^ McGranahan, Gordon; Schensul, Daniel; Singh, Gayatri (2016). “Inclusive urbanization: Can the 2030 Agenda be delivered without it?”. Environment & Urbanization. 28 (1): 13–34. Bibcode:2016EnUrb..28…13M. doi:10.1177/0956247815627522.
  49. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. Bibcode:2018npjCW…1….3B. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  50. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  51. ^ “Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities”. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
  52. ^ “Goal 12: Responsible consumption, production”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 13 August 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  53. ^ Walker, Tony R. (August 2021). “(Micro)plastics and the UN Sustainable Development Goals”. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 30: 100497. Bibcode:2021COGSC..3000497W. doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100497.
  54. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. Bibcode:2018npjCW…1….3B. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  55. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  56. ^ “Goal 13: Climate action”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 13 August 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  57. ^ “AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023 — IPCC”. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
  58. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. Bibcode:2018npjCW…1….3B. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  59. ^ “Goal 14: Life below water”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 15 August 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  60. ^ “Ocean acidification (Issues Brief)” (PDF). IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). November 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
  61. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  62. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  63. ^ Walker, Tony R. (August 2021). “(Micro)plastics and the UN Sustainable Development Goals”. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 30: 100497. doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100497. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  64. ^ “Goal 15: Life on land”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  65. ^ “Desertification, land degradation and drought .:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform”. sustainabledevelopment.un.org. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 5 September 2020.
  66. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  67. ^ “Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  68. ^ “Progress for Every Child in the SDG Era” (PDF). UNICEF. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 July 2020. Retrieved 2 April 2018.
  69. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. Bibcode:2018npjCW…1….3B. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  70. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  71. ^ “Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals”. UNDP. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
  72. ^ Pierce, Alan (26 November 2018). “SDG Indicators: why SDG 17 is the most important UN SDG”. Sopact. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
  73. ^ “Sustainable Development Goal 17”. Sustainable Development Goals. 16 November 2017. Archived from the original on 5 September 2018. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  74. ^ Peccia, T., R. Kelej, A. Hamdy, A. Fahmi (2017), “A reflection on Public-Private Partnerships’ contribution to the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals”, Scienza e Pace, VIII, 1, pp. 81–103.
  75. ^ Jump up to:a b Pierce, Alan (26 November 2018). “SDG Indicators: why SDG 17 is the most important UN SDG?”. Sopact. Archived from the original on 7 November 2020. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
  76. ^ “Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals”. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Retrieved 24 September 2020.
  77. ^ “#Envision2030Goal17: Partnerships for the goals”. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). Retrieved 24 September 2020.
  78. ^ Bartram, Jamie; Brocklehurst, Clarissa; Bradley, David; Muller, Mike; Evans, Barbara (December 2018). “Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation”. npj Clean Water. 1 (1): 3. doi:10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0. S2CID 169226066. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  79. ^ Mulholland, Eric (January 2019). Communicating Sustainable Development and the SDGs in Europe: Good practice examples from policy, academia, NGOs, and media (PDF). ESDN Quarterly Report 51. European Sustainable Development Network. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 June 2023.
  80. ^ “Project Everyone”. Project-everyone.org. Archived from the original on 17 September 2018. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
  81. ^ “Guest Article: Making the SDGs Famous and Popular”. IISD’s SDG Knowledge Hub. 16 December 2014. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  82. ^ Wudel, Katie (24 September 2015). “How This Great Design Is Bringing World Change to the Masses”. GOOD Magazine. Archived from the original on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  83. ^ “Global Festival of Action”. globalfestivalofideas.org. Archived from the original on 24 October 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  84. ^ “The Aarhus Convention safeguards transparency and supports disaster risk reduction and measurement of Sustainable Development Goals”. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 25 January 2020.
  85. ^ Mamadov, Ikrom (2018). “Youth, Aarhus and the Sustainable Development Goals” (PDF). Geneva: Youth Group on the Protection of the Environment.
  86. ^ “United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres has Appointed 17 Sustainable Development Goals Advocates”. The Global Goals. 10 May 2019. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 21 August 2020.
  87. ^ “UN Secretary-General António Guterres announces Founder and CEO of Chobani, Mr. Hamdi Ulukaya as SDG Advocate”. SDG Advocates. 20 July 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  88. ^ “Global Goals Week – About”. United Nations Foundation. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 4 August 2020.
  89. ^ “global goals week”. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
  90. ^ “Global Goals Week 2019”. IISD SDG Knowledge Hub. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 4 August 2020.
  91. ^ “Arctic Film Festival”. FilmFreeway. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 14 October 2019.
  92. ^ “The Arctic Film Festival – United Nations Partnerships for SDGs platform”. sustainabledevelopment.un.org. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 14 October 2019.
  93. ^ Development, World Commission on Environment and. “Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development – A/42/427 Annex, Chapter 2 – UN Documents: Gathering a body of global agreements”. www.un-documents.net. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  94. ^ “Major Agreements & Conventions .:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform”. United Nations. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  95. ^ “Resources .:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform”. United Nations. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  96. ^ Caballero, Paula (29 April 2016). “A Short History of the SDGs” (PDF). Deliver 2030. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 November 2017.
  97. ^ “Future We Want – Outcome document”. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
  98. ^ “Open Working Group proposal for Sustainable Development Goals”. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Archived from the original on 6 October 2015. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
  99. ^ “The road to dignity by 2030: ending poverty, transforming all lives and protecting the planet”. United Nations. 4 December 2014. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
  100. ^ Biermann, Frank; Kanie, Norichika; Kim, Rakhyun E (1 June 2017). “Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. Open issue, part II. 26–27: 26–31. Bibcode:2017COES…26…26B. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010. hdl:1874/358246. ISSN 1877-3435.
  101. ^ United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  102. ^ Jump up to:a b IPCC, 2018: Global Warming of 1.5°C.An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. In Press
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  104. ^ Jump up to:a b Machingura, Fortunate (27 February 2017). “The Sustainable Development Goals and their trade-offs”. ODI: Think change. Retrieved 25 April 2022.
  105. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas; Sénit, Carole-Anne; Grob, Leonie (31 July 2022), “Chapter 8: The Sustainable Development Goals as a Transformative Force?: Key Insights”, in Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas; Sénit, Carole-Anne (eds.), The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals (1 ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 204–26, doi:10.1017/9781009082945.009, ISBN 978-1-009-08294-5
  106. ^ Jump up to:a b “SDG Tracker”. Our World in Data. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  107. ^ “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs – Sustainable Development. Archived from the original on 5 December 2017. Retrieved 23 August 2015.
  108. ^ “Breakdown of U.N. Sustainable Development Goals”. The New York Times. 25 September 2015. Archived from the original on 9 July 2017. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
  109. ^ “World leaders adopt Sustainable Development Goals”. United Nations Development Programme. 25 September 2015. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 25 September 2015.
  110. ^ Jump up to:a b “The Future We Want”. United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. June 2012. Archived from the original on 23 April 2018. Retrieved 18 October 2016.
  111. ^ “Decade of Action”. United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 27 September 2022.
  112. ^ “Digital generation”. UNDP. Retrieved 8 August 2024.
  113. ^ Guterres, António (24 September 2019). “Remarks to High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development”. United Nations Secretary-General. Retrieved 27 September 2022.
  114. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Llanos, Andrea Ordóñez; Raven, Rob; Bexell, Magdalena; Botchwey, Brianna; Bornemann, Basil; Censoro, Jecel; Christen, Marius; Díaz, Liliana; Hickmann, Thomas (31 July 2022), Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas; Sénit, Carole-Anne (eds.), “Chapter 3: Implementation at Multiple Levels” (PDF), The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals (1 ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–91, doi:10.1017/9781009082945.004, ISBN 978-1-009-08294-5
  115. ^ Firzli, Nicolas (5 April 2017). “6th World Pensions Forum held at the Queen’s House: ESG and Asset Ownership” (PDF). Revue Analyse Financière. Revue Analyse Financière. Retrieved 28 April 2017.
  116. ^ Jump up to:a b c Firzli, Nicolas (3 April 2018). “Greening, Governance and Growth in the Age of Popular Empowerment”. FT Pensions Experts. Financial Times. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
  117. ^ “Gender equality and women’s rights in the post-2015 agenda: A foundation for sustainable development” (PDF). Oecd.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 18 October 2016.
  118. ^ Jump up to:a b c UNESCO (2019) Culture | 2030 Indicators Archived 30 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, France, ISBN 978-92-3-100355-4, CC-BY-ND 3.0 IGO
  119. ^ Global Citizenship Education: Topics and learning objectives Archived 12 July 2018 at the Wayback Machine, UNESCO, 2015.
  120. ^ UNESCO (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives (PDF). Paris, UNESCO. p. 7. ISBN 978-92-3-100209-0. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  121. ^ Jump up to:a b “Sustainable development goals – United Nations”. United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  122. ^ “Child Poverty”. www.nccp.org. Archived from the original on 24 June 2018. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  123. ^ Jump up to:a b “Health – United Nations Sustainable Development”. United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  124. ^ “Hunger and food security – United Nations Sustainable Development”. United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  125. ^ Bank, European Investment (14 December 2020). The EIB Group Climate Bank Roadmap 2021–2025. European Investment Bank. ISBN 978-92-861-4908-5.
  126. ^ Bhattacharya, Amar; Ivanyna, Maksym; Oman, William; Stern, Nicholas (26 May 2021). “Climate Action to Unlock the Inclusive Growth Story of the 21st Century”. IMF Working Papers. 2021 (147): 1. doi:10.5089/9781513573366.001. S2CID 242841434.
  127. ^ “Grand Duchy of Luxembourg International Climate Finance Strategy” (PDF).
  128. ^ Our World in Data team (2023) – “Promote just, peaceful and inclusive societies” Published online at OurWorldinData.org.
  129. ^ Jump up to:a b c Bogers, Maya; Biermann, Frank; Kalfagianni, Agni; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Treep, Jelle; de Vos, Martine G. (2022). “The impact of the Sustainable Development Goals on a network of 276 international organizations”. Global Environmental Change. 76: 102567. Bibcode:2022GEC….7602567B. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102567.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  130. ^ Bank, European Investment (19 October 2022). Finance in Africa – Navigating the financial landscape in turbulent times. European Investment Bank. ISBN 978-92-861-5382-2.
  131. ^ “Financing for Sustainable Development Report 2021” (PDF). UN.
  132. ^ Nations, United. “Population growth, environmental degradation and climate change”. United Nations. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  133. ^ “IMF and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)”. IMF. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  134. ^ Jump up to:a b Hutton, Guy (15 November 2017). “The Costs of Meeting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal Targets on Drinking Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene” (PDF). Documents/World Bank. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
  135. ^ “UNCTAD | Press Release”. unctad.org. 24 June 2014. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 8 December 2019.
  136. ^ Jump up to:a b Alexander Dill (2018) The SDGs are public goods – Costs, Sources and Measures of Financing for Development Archived 30 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine – Policy paper to the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Financing for Development, Basel Institute of Commons and Economics
  137. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Yunita, Abbie; Biermann, Frank; Kim, Rakhyun E; Vijge, Marjanneke J (2023). “Making development legible to capital: The promise and limits of ‘innovative’ debt financing for the Sustainable Development Goals in Indonesia”. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. 6 (4): 2271–2294. Bibcode:2023EnPlE…6.2271Y. doi:10.1177/25148486231159301. ISSN 2514-8486.
  138. ^ “Addis Ababa Action Agenda” (PDF). www.un.org. 13 July 2015.
  139. ^ United Nations. “UN Secretary-General’s Strategy for Financing the 2030 Agenda”. United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 19 November 2024.
  140. ^ “About the IATF | United Nations”. developmentfinance.un.org. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 8 December 2019.
  141. ^ “Press Release: From Billions to Trillions–Transforming Development Finance Post-2015 Financing for Development: Multilateral Development Finance”. IMF. 16 April 2015. Retrieved 19 November 2024.
  142. ^ Madsbjerg, Saadia (19 September 2017). “A New Role for Foundations in Financing the Global Goals”. Archived from the original on 23 August 2018. Retrieved 4 June 2018.
  143. ^ Burgess, Cameron (March 2018). “From Billions to Trillions: Mobilising the Missing Trillions to Solve the Sustainable Development Goals”. sphaera.world. Archived from the original on 17 September 2018. Retrieved 4 June 2018.
  144. ^ Firzli, M. Nicolas J. (October 2016). “Beyond SDGs: Can Fiduciary Capitalism and Bolder, Better Boards Jumpstart Economic Growth?”. Analyse Financiere. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 1 November 2016.
  145. ^ Firzli, Nicolas (10 February 2020). “G7 Pensions Roundtable: Les ODD (‘SDGs’) Désormais Incontournables”. Cahiers du Centre des Professions Financières. CPF. SSRN 3545217.
  146. ^ McGregor, Jena (20 August 2019). “Group of top CEOs says maximizing shareholder profits no longer can be the primary goal of corporations”. The Washington Post. WP. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  147. ^ Firzli, Nicolas (7 December 2018). “An Examination of Pensions Trends. On Balance, How Do Things Look?”. BNPSS Newsletter. BNP Paribas Securities Services. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2019.
  148. ^ Jump up to:a b c SEI; CEEW (18 May 2022). “Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future”. SEI Reports. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  149. ^ Jump up to:a b “Let’s get the SDGs back on track”. Stockholm Environment Institute. 1 October 2020. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
  150. ^ “Impact of Pandemic, Worldwide Crises Must Be Overcome to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals, Speakers Stress, as High-Level Political Forum Opens | UN Press”. press.un.org. Retrieved 11 July 2023.
  151. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Forestier, Oana; Kim, Rakhyun E. (September 2020). “Cherry-picking the Sustainable Development Goals: Goal prioritization by national governments and implications for global governance”. Sustainable Development. 28 (5): 1269–1278. doi:10.1002/sd.2082. ISSN 0968-0802. S2CID 225737527.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  152. ^ Jump up to:a b Bogers, Maya; Biermann, Frank; Kalfagianni, Agni; Kim, Rakhyun E. (2023). “The SDGs as integrating force in global governance? Challenges and opportunities”. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 23 (2): 157–164. Bibcode:2023IEAPL..23..157B. doi:10.1007/s10784-023-09607-9. ISSN 1567-9764.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  153. ^ The Sustainable Development Goals report 2019. United Nations. 2019. ISBN 978-92-1-101403-7. OCLC 1117643666.[page needed]
  154. ^ Publications, United Nations (2019). Report of the inter-agency task force on financing for development 2019: financing for sustainable development report 2019. ISBN 978-92-1-101404-4. OCLC 1098817400.[page needed]
  155. ^ Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General, Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: The Future is Now – Science for Achieving Sustainable Development Archived 30 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine, (United Nations, New York, 2019)
  156. ^ “Sustainable development in the European Union”. Eurostat.
  157. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Leaving Biodiversity, Peace and Social Inclusion behind” (PDF). Basel Institute of Commons and Economics. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 27 November 2019.
  158. ^ Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G. (2019): Sustainable Development Report 2019 Archived 22 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN)
  159. ^ Ritchie, Roser, Mispy, Ortiz-Ospina. “Measuring progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals“. SDG-Tracker.org, 2018. Archived 30 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine.
  160. ^ “SDG-Tracker.org Releases New Resources”. IISD’s SDG Knowledge Hub. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 10 March 2019.
  161. ^ “Eerste ‘tracker’ die progressie op SDG’s per land volgt | Fondsnieuws”. www.fondsnieuws.nl. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 10 March 2019.
  162. ^ “SDG Gracker”. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
  163. ^ SDSN; Bertelsmann Stiftung. “SDG Index”. SDG Index and Dashboards Report. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 24 May 2019.
  164. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i van Norren, Dorine E. (1 September 2020). “The Sustainable Development Goals viewed through Gross National Happiness, Ubuntu, and Buen Vivir”. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 20 (3): 431–458. Bibcode:2020IEAPL..20..431V. doi:10.1007/s10784-020-09487-3. ISSN 1573-1553.
  165. ^ Schleicher, Judith; Schaafsma, Marije; Vira, Bhaskar (2018). “Will the Sustainable Development Goals address the links between poverty and the natural environment?”. Current Opinion in L̾o̾l̾o̾l̾o̾47. 34: 43–47. Bibcode:2018COES…34…43S. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.004.
  166. ^ “The 169 commandments”. The Economist. Archived from the original on 18 October 2017. Retrieved 19 February 2016.
  167. ^ “The SDGs wedding cake”. www.stockholmresilience.org. 14 June 2016. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  168. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Hanscom, Laurel; Lin, David (11 July 2017). “Making the Sustainable Development Goals Consistent with Sustainability”. Frontiers in Energy Research. 5: 18. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2017.00018.
  169. ^ The University of Queensland (6 July 2020). “Latest U.N. sustainability goals pose more harm than good for environment, scientists warn”. phys.org. Archived from the original on 6 July 2020. Retrieved 27 August 2020.
  170. ^ Zeng, Yiwen; Maxwell, Sean; Runting, Rebecca K.; Venter, Oscar; Watson, James E. M.; Carrasco, L. Roman (October 2020). “Environmental destruction not avoided with the Sustainable Development Goals”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (10): 795–798. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..795Z. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0555-0. S2CID 220260626.
  171. ^ Reyers, Belinda; Stafford-Smith, Mark; Erb, Karl-Heinz; Scholes, Robert J; Selomane, Odirilwe (June 2017). “Essential Variables help to focus Sustainable Development Goals monitoring”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 26–27: 97–105. Bibcode:2017COES…26…97R. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.003. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-002E-1851-0. S2CID 113715479.
  172. ^ Scown, Murray W. (November 2020). “The Sustainable Development Goals need geoscience”. Nature Geoscience. 13 (11): 714–715. Bibcode:2020NatGe..13..714S. doi:10.1038/s41561-020-00652-6. hdl:1874/410039. S2CID 225071652.
  173. ^ Kulonen, Aino; Adler, Carolina; Bracher, Christoph; Dach, Susanne Wymann von (2019). “Spatial context matters in monitoring and reporting on Sustainable Development Goals: Reflections based on research in mountain regions”. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society. 28 (2): 90–94. doi:10.14512/gaia.28.2.5. hdl:20.500.11850/350274. S2CID 197775743.
  174. ^ Reyers, Belinda; Selig, Elizabeth R. (August 2020). “Global targets that reveal the social–ecological interdependencies of sustainable development”. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 4 (8): 1011–1019. Bibcode:2020NatEE…4.1011R. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1230-6. hdl:2263/78221. PMID 32690904. S2CID 220656353.
  175. ^ Hickel, Jason (September 2019). “The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet”. Sustainable Development. 27 (5): 873–884. doi:10.1002/sd.1947. S2CID 159060032.
  176. ^ Jump up to:a b Chenary, Kimia; Pirian Kalat, Omid; Sharifi, Ayyoob (2024). “Forecasting sustainable development goals scores by 2030 using machine learning models”. Sustainable Development. 32 (6): 6520–6538. doi:10.1002/sd.3037.
  177. ^ Cabinet, Prime Minister and (20 February 2018). “2030 Sustainable Development Goals”. www.pmc.gov.au. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 14 September 2020.
  178. ^ Monash Sustainable Development Institute (19 November 2020). “Transforming Australis SDG Progress Report – 2020 Update” (PDF). SDG Transforming Australia. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021.
  179. ^ Jump up to:a b Curtis, Simon; Klaus, Ian (2024). The Belt and Road City: Geopolitics, Urbanization, and China’s Search for a New International Order. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. doi:10.2307/jj.11589102. ISBN 9780300266900. JSTOR jj.11589102.
  180. ^ “Sustainable Development Goals”. UNDP in Ghana. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
  181. ^ “FG presents SDGs voluntary national review report to UN today”. Guardian Nigeria. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
  182. ^ “Sustainable Development Report 2020”. dashboards.sdgindex.org. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
  183. ^ “The Government of Nigeria Presents 2nd Voluntary National Review on Sustainable Development”. Sustainable Development Goals. 28 July 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
  184. ^ “Sustainable Development – Baltic 2030”. cbss.org. Archived from the original on 15 November 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  185. ^ “Lebanon .:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform”. sustainabledevelopment.un.org. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 4 October 2020.
  186. ^ Luomi, M.; Fuller, G.; Dahan, L.; Lisboa Båsund, K.; de la Mothe Karoubi, E.; Lafortune, G. (2019). Arab Region SDG Index and Dashboards Report 2019. SDG Centre of Excellence for the Arab Region/Emirates Diplomatic Academy and Sustainable Development Solutions Network. p. 5.
  187. ^ Al-Raeei, Marwan (22 May 2023). “Analysing of the sustainable development goals in Damascus University during Syrian crisis using the strategy in the university and the bibliometrics data from SciVal”. Discover Sustainability. 4 (1): 24. Bibcode:2023DiSus…4…24A. doi:10.1007/s43621-023-00140-y. ISSN 2662-9984. PMC 10201509. PMID 37251498.
  188. ^ Department for International Development (2017) Agenda 2030 The UK Government’s approach to delivering the Global Goals for Sustainable Development – at home and around the world Archived 30 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine
  189. ^ “The UK’s global contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals – Progress, gaps and recommendations”. Bond. 17 June 2019. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 30 October 2019.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »