Sustainable Technology of 2240

Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

Sustainable Technology of 2240: A Vision

Disclaimer: This is a speculative exploration of potential sustainable technologies in 2240. It’s based on current trends and extrapolated advancements.

A World of Symbiosis

By 2240, humanity has likely achieved a harmonious coexistence with the planet. Sustainable technologies are not just efficient; they are symbiotic, working in tandem with nature to create a regenerative system.

Key Themes:

• Circular Economy: Resources are endlessly recycled and reused, minimizing waste and pollution.  
• Biomimicry: Technologies inspired by nature’s ingenious designs, such as self-healing materials and efficient energy systems.
• Renewable Energy Dominance: Fusion power and advanced solar technologies provide abundant, clean energy.
• Space-Based Infrastructure: Large-scale solar power stations in space beam energy wirelessly to Earth, supplementing terrestrial sources.  
• AI-Powered Sustainability: Artificial intelligence optimizes resource management, predicts environmental changes, and develops innovative solutions.  

Potential Technologies:

• Self-Repairing Infrastructure: Buildings and roads made from bio-inspired materials that can heal themselves, reducing maintenance and waste.
• Carbon-Negative Technologies: Technologies that actively remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, such as direct air capture and enhanced weathering.  
• Personalized Nutrition: 3D food printers create customized, nutrient-rich meals based on individual needs, reducing food waste and environmental impact.  
• Sustainable Transportation: Autonomous electric vehicles and hyperloop systems minimize emissions and traffic congestion.  
• Precision Agriculture: AI-powered drones and sensors optimize crop yields and water usage, reducing the need for pesticides and fertilizers.  

Challenges and Considerations:

• Ethical Implications: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and addressing potential job displacement.
• Social and Political Will: Maintaining global cooperation and political stability to achieve long-term sustainability goals.
• Unforeseen Challenges: Adapting to unexpected challenges, such as climate change impacts or new environmental threats.

A Note of Optimism:

While challenges remain, the potential for a sustainable future in 2240 is bright. By embracing innovation, collaboration, and a deep respect for nature, humanity can create a world where technology serves both people and the planet.

Would you like to explore a specific aspect of sustainable technology in more detail?

What is Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

Sustainable technology in 2240 would likely be vastly different from what we know today. It would likely be characterized by:

• Symbiotic Integration: Technologies seamlessly integrated with natural systems, mimicking and enhancing them rather than dominating them.
• Circular Economy: A closed-loop system where resources are perpetually reused and recycled, eliminating waste.  
• Renewable Energy Dominance: Abundant clean energy sources like fusion power and advanced solar technologies would power society.
• Biomimicry: Technologies inspired by nature’s efficient designs, such as self-healing materials and optimized energy systems.  
• AI-Powered Sustainability: Artificial intelligence would play a crucial role in optimizing resource management, predicting environmental changes, and developing innovative solutions.  

Potential Examples:

• Self-Repairing Infrastructure: Buildings and roads made from bio-inspired materials that can heal themselves, minimizing maintenance and waste.
• Carbon-Negative Technologies: Technologies that actively remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, such as direct air capture and enhanced weathering.
• Personalized Nutrition: 3D food printers creating customized, nutrient-rich meals, reducing food waste and environmental impact.  
• Sustainable Transportation: Autonomous electric vehicles and hyperloop systems minimizing emissions and traffic congestion.  
• Precision Agriculture: AI-powered drones and sensors optimizing crop yields and water usage, reducing the need for pesticides and fertilizers.  

Key Considerations:

• Ethical Implications: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and addressing potential job displacement.
• Social and Political Will: Maintaining global cooperation and political stability to achieve long-term sustainability goals.
• Unforeseen Challenges: Adapting to unexpected challenges, such as climate change impacts or new environmental threats.

This is a speculative vision, but it highlights the potential for a future where technology works in harmony with nature to create a sustainable and equitable world.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

Sustainable technology in 2240 will be essential for the survival and well-being of all living beings on Earth. Here’s why:

• Mitigating Climate Change: By 2240, the effects of climate change will likely be more severe. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for mitigating these effects, such as:
  • Carbon Capture and Storage: Removing excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.  
  • Renewable Energy Sources: Transitioning completely away from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and fusion power.
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Developing more efficient and environmentally friendly farming practices.
• Preserving Biodiversity: Human activities have significantly impacted biodiversity. Sustainable technologies can help:
  • Protect and Restore Ecosystems: Developing technologies for habitat restoration and conservation.
  • Reduce Pollution: Minimizing pollution of air, water, and soil.
• Ensuring Resource Sustainability: As the global population grows, the demand for resources will increase. Sustainable technologies are needed to:
  • Improve Resource Efficiency: Utilizing resources more efficiently and minimizing waste.  
  • Develop Sustainable Materials: Creating materials that are biodegradable, recyclable, and have minimal environmental impact.
• Improving Human Health and Well-being: Sustainable technologies can contribute to:
  • Clean Water and Sanitation: Providing access to clean water and sanitation for all.
  • Sustainable Food Production: Producing safe and nutritious food for a growing population.
  • Reducing Environmental Toxins: Minimizing exposure to environmental toxins that can harm human health.  

In essence, sustainable technology in 2240 will be required by everyone – humans, animals, and the planet itself – to ensure a healthy and prosperous future.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

Sustainable technology in 2240 won’t be required at a specific point in time. Instead, the need for these technologies will likely grow gradually as:

• Climate Change Intensifies: The effects of climate change, such as rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and resource scarcity, will become more pronounced.  
• Population Growth Continues: A larger global population will put increased strain on resources and the environment.
• Technological Advancements Progress: As our understanding of technology and its impact on the environment evolves, more sophisticated and sustainable solutions will become possible.

Therefore, the development and implementation of sustainable technologies in 2240 will be an ongoing and evolving process. It will require continuous innovation, adaptation, and a proactive approach to addressing the challenges of the future.

COURTESY : Intel Technology

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

Sustainable technology in 2240 will be required everywhere.

Here’s why:

• Global Impact of Climate Change: Climate change is a global phenomenon. Its effects, such as rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and resource scarcity, will be felt worldwide.  
• Interconnectedness of the Planet: Our planet’s systems are interconnected. Actions taken in one region can have far-reaching consequences for others.  
• Resource Depletion: Many resources are finite. Sustainable technologies are needed to ensure their availability for future generations, regardless of location.  

Specific examples include:

• Developing nations: May require sustainable technologies to address poverty, improve access to clean water and energy, and adapt to the impacts of climate change.  
• Developed nations: Will need to transition to a more sustainable model of consumption and production, reducing their environmental footprint.  
• Polar regions: Will require technologies to monitor and adapt to the rapid changes occurring in these sensitive ecosystems.  
• Ocean environments: Sustainable technologies will be crucial for protecting marine life, mitigating ocean acidification, and managing fisheries sustainably.  

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology will be universal in 2240, as it will be essential for the long-term health and well-being of the planet and all its inhabitants.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

Sustainable technology in 2240 will be required in several ways:

• Resource Efficiency:
  • Minimizing Waste: Technologies will focus on circular economy principles, where resources are constantly reused and recycled, eliminating waste streams.  
  • Optimizing Resource Use: Technologies will be designed for maximum efficiency, minimizing energy consumption and material usage in all sectors.
• Environmental Protection:
  • Mitigating Climate Change: Technologies will be crucial for carbon capture, renewable energy generation, and climate change adaptation strategies.
  • Preserving Biodiversity: Technologies will be used to monitor and protect ecosystems, restore degraded habitats, and minimize pollution.
• Social Equity:
  • Ensuring Access: Sustainable technologies should be accessible and affordable for all, regardless of socioeconomic status.  
  • Addressing Inequality: Technologies should be developed and deployed in a way that addresses social and economic inequalities.
• Continuous Innovation:
  • Research and Development: Ongoing research and development will be essential to continually improve existing technologies and develop new, more sustainable solutions.
  • Adaptation and Flexibility: Technologies will need to be adaptable and flexible to address evolving challenges and changing circumstances.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 2240 will be required to be integrated into every aspect of human society, from energy production and transportation to agriculture and urban planning. It will be a cornerstone of a sustainable future, ensuring the well-being of both people and the planet.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

Case Study: The “Symbiotic City” of Neo-Kyoto (2240)

Background:

By 2240, the global climate crisis has intensified. Rising sea levels threaten coastal cities, extreme weather events are more frequent, and resource scarcity is a growing concern. Neo-Kyoto, a once-bustling metropolis in Japan, has undergone a radical transformation, becoming a model for sustainable urban living.

The Challenge:

Neo-Kyoto faced the dual challenges of climate change adaptation and mitigating its own environmental impact. The city had a dense population, a legacy of industrial pollution, and limited natural resources.

The Solution:

Neo-Kyoto embraced a “symbiotic city” model, integrating cutting-edge technology with nature-based solutions:

1. Energy Revolution:
   • Fusion Power: The city transitioned to a local fusion reactor, providing clean, abundant energy for all its needs.
   • Vertical Farming: High-rise farms integrated with the city’s infrastructure, utilizing hydroponics and artificial intelligence to maximize food production while minimizing land use and environmental impact.
   • Smart Grid: A decentralized, AI-powered grid efficiently distributes energy, optimizing usage and minimizing waste.
2. Circular Economy:
   • Waste-to-Resource Facilities: Advanced recycling technologies convert waste into valuable resources, such as building materials and fertilizers.
   • 3D Printing: Customized products are 3D printed on-demand, reducing the need for mass production and minimizing transportation.  
   • Regenerative Design: Buildings are designed to be modular, adaptable, and energy-efficient, incorporating biomimicry principles.
3. Nature Integration:
   • Green Roofs and Vertical Gardens: Extensive green spaces cover buildings, providing insulation, absorbing rainwater, and creating habitats for urban wildlife.  
   • Urban Forests: Reforestation initiatives have transformed degraded areas into lush urban forests, improving air quality and mitigating the urban heat island effect.
   • Blue-Green Infrastructure: Rainwater harvesting systems and permeable pavements reduce stormwater runoff and recharge groundwater aquifers.

Results:

• Improved Air and Water Quality: Significant reductions in air and water pollution have improved public health and environmental quality.
• Enhanced Resilience: Neo-Kyoto is better equipped to withstand extreme weather events and other climate-related challenges.
• Increased Quality of Life: Residents enjoy a higher quality of life with access to fresh, locally grown food, clean air and water, and green spaces.
• Economic Prosperity: The city has become a hub for sustainable innovation, attracting businesses and investment.

Challenges and Considerations:

• Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and addressing potential job displacement.
• Technological Limitations: Continuous research and development are needed to overcome the limitations of current technologies.
• Public Acceptance: Promoting public awareness and understanding of the benefits of sustainable living.

Conclusion:

The case of Neo-Kyoto demonstrates how a city can transition to a sustainable future by embracing a holistic approach that integrates technology, nature, and community. While challenges remain, the “symbiotic city” model offers a vision for a future where urban living can thrive in harmony with the environment.

Note: This is a fictional case study, but it draws inspiration from real-world examples of sustainable urban development and emerging technologies.

Would you like to explore a specific aspect of this case study further, such as the role of AI, the economic implications, or the social challenges?Sources and related content

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2240: A Vision for a Thriving Future

1. Introduction

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in 2240. By this point, humanity must have transitioned to a symbiotic relationship with the planet, where technological advancements are not merely efficient but regenerative, harmonizing with natural systems. This necessitates a paradigm shift, moving beyond mere sustainability towards a regenerative and equitable future.

2. Key Principles of Sustainable Technology in 2240

• Symbiosis with Nature: Technologies will be designed to mimic and enhance natural processes, minimizing disruption and maximizing ecological benefits. This includes biomimicry, where solutions are inspired by nature’s ingenious designs.
• Circular Economy: A closed-loop system will be the norm, where resources are perpetually reused, recycled, and regenerated. Waste will be virtually eliminated, and production processes will be designed for maximum resource efficiency.
• Renewable Energy Dominance: Fusion power and advanced solar technologies will provide abundant, clean energy, eliminating the reliance on fossil fuels.
• AI-Powered Sustainability: Artificial intelligence will play a crucial role in optimizing resource management, predicting environmental changes, and developing innovative solutions.
• Social Equity: Sustainable technologies must be accessible and equitable for all, ensuring that the benefits of a sustainable future are shared by all of humanity.

3. Key Areas of Technological Advancement

• Energy:
  • Fusion Power: Matured and widely deployed, providing a virtually limitless source of clean energy.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar power stations in space beam energy wirelessly to Earth, supplementing terrestrial sources.
  • Energy Storage: Advanced energy storage technologies, such as grid-scale batteries and supercapacitors, enable the seamless integration of renewable energy sources.
• Resource Management:
  • Precision Agriculture: AI-powered drones and sensors optimize crop yields and water usage, reducing the need for pesticides and fertilizers.
  • Water Desalination: Advanced, energy-efficient desalination technologies provide access to clean water in arid regions.
  • Waste Management: Closed-loop systems for waste recycling and repurposing, including advanced biodegradation and material recovery technologies.
• Environmental Restoration:
  • Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Technologies actively remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, such as direct air capture and enhanced weathering.
  • Geoengineering: Carefully controlled and ethical geoengineering techniques may be employed to mitigate climate change impacts.
  • Biodiversity Conservation: Technologies for habitat restoration, species protection, and biodiversity monitoring.
• Human Well-being:
  • Personalized Medicine: Advanced diagnostics and personalized treatments improve human health and longevity.
  • Sustainable Food Production: 3D food printing and cellular agriculture provide nutritious and sustainable food options.
  • Smart Cities: Integrated urban systems optimize resource use, reduce pollution, and enhance quality of life for city dwellers.

4. Challenges and Considerations

• Ethical Implications: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and addressing potential job displacement.
• Social and Political Will: Maintaining global cooperation and political stability to achieve long-term sustainability goals.
• Unforeseen Challenges: Adapting to unexpected challenges, such as climate change impacts or new environmental threats.
• Technological Limitations: Continuous research and development are essential to overcome the limitations of current technologies.

5. Conclusion

Sustainable technology in 2240 will be the cornerstone of a thriving and equitable future. By embracing innovation, collaboration, and a deep respect for nature, humanity can create a world where technology serves both people and the planet. This requires a multi-faceted approach that integrates technological advancements with social, economic, and environmental considerations.

6. Call to Action

This white paper serves as a roadmap for the future. It calls for:

• Increased investment in research and development of sustainable technologies.
• Stronger international cooperation to address global sustainability challenges.
• Education and awareness campaigns to promote public understanding and engagement.
• Policy frameworks that incentivize and support the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.

By working together, humanity can create a future where technology empowers a sustainable and prosperous world for all.

Disclaimer: This white paper presents a speculative vision of the future. The actual development and implementation of sustainable technologies will depend on a variety of factors, including technological advancements, social and political developments, and unforeseen challenges.

Note: This is a sample white paper. A more comprehensive document would include detailed research, data analysis, and citations.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

In 2240, industrial applications of sustainable technology will be deeply integrated and transformative. Here are some key areas:

1. Energy Production & Efficiency:

• Fusion Power: Widespread adoption of fusion reactors will power industries with clean, abundant energy, replacing fossil fuels entirely.
• Renewable Energy Integration: Industries will be fully integrated with renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal, utilizing smart grids and advanced energy storage solutions.
• Industrial Symbiosis: Industries will collaborate, sharing resources like waste heat and byproducts, creating closed-loop systems that minimize waste and maximize efficiency.

2. Resource Management & Circular Economy:

• 3D Printing & Additive Manufacturing: Revolutionize production by minimizing waste, enabling on-demand manufacturing, and utilizing recycled materials.  
• Industrial Biotechnology: Utilize biological systems for manufacturing chemicals, materials, and fuels, reducing reliance on fossil resources.  
• Closed-Loop Systems: Implement cradle-to-cradle principles where products are designed for disassembly, repair, and reuse, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.

3. Advanced Manufacturing:

• Nanotechnology: Revolutionize materials science, enabling the creation of high-performance, lightweight, and durable materials with reduced environmental impact.  
• Robotics & Automation: Highly advanced robots and AI will automate production processes, improving efficiency, safety, and precision while reducing human labor in hazardous environments.
• Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT): Connect industrial equipment and systems, enabling real-time data analysis, predictive maintenance, and optimized operations.  

4. Environmental Remediation & Mitigation:

• Carbon Capture & Utilization (CCU): Capture carbon emissions and utilize them as a valuable resource for producing fuels, chemicals, and building materials.  
• Pollution Prevention & Control: Advanced technologies for air and water purification, minimizing industrial pollution and environmental impact.
• Sustainable Agriculture: Precision agriculture techniques, including AI-powered farming, will optimize resource use, minimize environmental impact, and enhance food security.  

5. Social & Economic Impact:

• Green Jobs: Create new job opportunities in sustainable technology sectors, such as renewable energy, environmental engineering, and circular economy industries.
• Economic Growth: Drive economic growth through innovation, increased efficiency, and the development of new markets for sustainable products and services.
• Social Equity: Ensure equitable access to sustainable technologies and benefits for all communities, minimizing social and economic disparities.

Key Considerations:

• Ethical Implications: Address ethical concerns related to automation, data privacy, and the equitable distribution of benefits from sustainable technologies.
• Regulatory Frameworks: Develop and implement robust regulatory frameworks to encourage sustainable industrial practices and address potential risks.
• Continuous Innovation: Foster a culture of continuous innovation and research and development to drive advancements in sustainable industrial technologies.

By embracing these principles and technologies, industries in 2240 can operate sustainably, minimizing their environmental impact while contributing to a thriving and equitable future for all.

Disclaimer: This is a speculative vision of the future. The actual development and implementation of sustainable industrial technologies will depend on a variety of factors, including technological advancements, social and political developments, and unforeseen challenges.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2240 ?

Research and development (R&D) of sustainable technologies for 2240 will be crucial for shaping a future where humans coexist harmoniously with the planet. Here’s a look at key areas and considerations:

Key Areas of R&D Focus:

• Advanced Energy Systems:
  • Fusion Power: Continued research and development of controlled nuclear fusion for a virtually limitless, clean energy source.
  • Renewable Energy Technologies:
    • Solar: High-efficiency solar cells, space-based solar power systems, and integrated solar solutions for buildings and infrastructure.
    • Wind: Advanced wind turbines with improved efficiency and reduced environmental impact.
    • Geothermal: Enhanced geothermal systems and innovative technologies for accessing deeper geothermal resources.
  • Energy Storage: High-capacity, long-duration energy storage solutions like advanced batteries, supercapacitors, and compressed air energy storage.
• Resource Management & Circular Economy:
  • Water Technologies:
    • Desalination: More energy-efficient and cost-effective desalination technologies.
    • Water Reuse & Recycling: Advanced wastewater treatment and water purification systems.
  • Waste Management:
    • Biodegradable Materials: Developing fully biodegradable and compostable materials for all applications.
    • Waste-to-Energy Technologies: Innovative technologies for converting waste into valuable energy sources.
    • Circular Economy Solutions: Designing products and systems for maximum recyclability, repair, and reuse.  
• Environmental Restoration & Climate Change Mitigation:
  • Carbon Capture & Sequestration: Developing more efficient and cost-effective methods for capturing and storing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
  • Geoengineering: Researching and developing safe and effective geoengineering techniques (with careful consideration of potential risks) to mitigate climate change impacts.
  • Biodiversity Conservation: Technologies for habitat restoration, species protection, and biodiversity monitoring.
• Biotechnology & Synthetic Biology:
  • Bio-based Materials: Developing sustainable alternatives to traditional materials using biological processes.
  • Biofuels & Bioenergy: Researching and developing advanced biofuels and bioenergy technologies.  
  • Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems for a wide range of applications, including environmental remediation and sustainable production.  
• Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning:
  • AI-powered Sustainability Solutions: Developing AI algorithms for optimizing resource management, predicting environmental changes, and developing innovative solutions.
  • Smart Cities & Smart Infrastructure: Utilizing AI and IoT to create more sustainable and resilient urban environments.

Key Considerations for R&D:

• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Fostering strong collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and policymakers.
• Long-Term Vision: Focusing on long-term, sustainable solutions rather than short-term gains.
• Ethical Considerations: Addressing ethical implications and ensuring equitable access to and distribution of sustainable technologies.  
• Public Engagement: Engaging the public in the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.
• Continuous Learning & Adaptation: Adapting research and development efforts based on new scientific discoveries and evolving societal needs.

Conclusion:

R&D of sustainable technologies for 2240 will be a continuous and evolving process. By prioritizing long-term sustainability, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and addressing ethical considerations, we can pave the way for a future where humans and the planet thrive in harmony.

Disclaimer: This is a general overview. The specific areas of research and development will likely evolve significantly in the coming decades based on emerging challenges and opportunities.

COURTESY : Voith Group

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.