Sustainable Technology of 2230

Sustainable Technology of 2230 ?

Sustainable Technology of 2230: A Glimpse into the Future

Sustainable technology in 2230 is likely to be vastly different from what we know today. It will be characterized by advanced materials, artificial intelligence, and renewable energy sources. Here are some potential examples:

1. Self-Healing Materials: Imagine buildings that repair themselves after minor damage, or clothes that mend microscopic tears. These materials, infused with nanotechnology, could revolutionize industries and reduce waste. selfhealing concrete

2. AI-Powered Precision Agriculture: Advanced AI could optimize crop yields, monitor soil health, and predict weather patterns with unprecedented accuracy. This would lead to more efficient farming practices and reduce the environmental impact of agriculture. AIpowered precision agriculture

3. Space-Based Solar Power: As energy demands increase, space-based solar power could become a reality. Satellites equipped with solar panels could collect and transmit energy to Earth, providing a constant, clean energy source. spacebased solar power

4. 3D Printing of Food: 3D food printers could create customized, nutritious meals using plant-based ingredients. This could reduce food waste and tailor diets to individual needs. 3D food printing

5. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC): OTEC plants could harness the temperature difference between warm surface water and cold deep water to generate electricity. This could be a significant source of renewable energy, especially for coastal regions. ocean thermal energy conversion

These are just a few examples of the many sustainable technologies that could emerge by 2230. As technology continues to advance, we can expect even more innovative solutions to environmental challenges.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2230 ?

Sustainable Technology of 2230: A Glimpse into the Future

Sustainable technology in 2230 is likely to be vastly different from what we know today. It will be characterized by advanced materials, artificial intelligence, and renewable energy sources. Here are some potential examples:

1. Self-Healing Materials: Imagine buildings that repair themselves after minor damage, or clothes that mend microscopic tears. These materials, infused with nanotechnology, could revolutionize industries and reduce wasteselfhealing concrete

2. AI-Powered Precision Agriculture: Advanced AI could optimize crop yields, monitor soil health, and predict weather patterns with unprecedented accuracy. This would lead to more efficient farming practices and reduce the environmental impact of agriculture. AIpowered precision agriculture

3. Space-Based Solar Power: As energy demands increase, space-based solar power could become a reality. Satellites equipped with solar panels could collect and transmit energy to Earth, providing a constant, clean energy source. spacebased solar power

4. 3D Printing of Food: 3D food printers could create customized, nutritious meals using plant-based ingredients. This could reduce food waste and tailor diets to individual needs. 3D food printing

5. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC): OTEC plants could harness the temperature difference between warm surface water and cold deep water to generate electricity. This could be a significant source of renewable energy, especially for coastal regions. ocean thermal energy conversion

These are just a few examples of the many sustainable technologies that could emerge by 2230. As technology continues to advance, we can expect even more innovative solutions to environmental challenges.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2230 ?

Sustainable technology in 2230 will be essential for everyone. Here’s why:

• Individuals:
  • Improved Quality of Life: Sustainable technologies will lead to cleaner air and water, healthier food, and more efficient and affordable energy. This will directly improve individual health and well-being.  
  • Increased Comfort and Convenience: Technologies like self-healing materials and AI-powered homes will make daily life more comfortable and convenient.
• Businesses:
  • Reduced Costs: Sustainable practices can lead to significant cost savings through increased energy efficiency, reduced waste, and optimized resource use.  
  • Competitive Advantage: Consumers are increasingly demanding products and services from sustainable companies. Embracing sustainable technologies can give businesses a competitive edge.  
• Governments:
  • Environmental Protection: Sustainable technologies are crucial for mitigating climate change, protecting biodiversity, and ensuring the long-term health of the planet.
  • Economic Growth: Investing in sustainable technologies can create new jobs, stimulate economic growth, and improve national security.
• Future Generations:
  • A Sustainable Planet: The long-term survival of humanity depends on our ability to create a sustainable future. Sustainable technologies are essential for ensuring that future generations inherit a healthy planet with abundant resources.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 2230 will be required by everyone because it will be essential for creating a just, equitable, and sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2230 ?

The VDI 2230 guideline is a German standard for calculating high-strength bolted joints. It is not a futuristic technology, but rather a current engineering standard used in various industries, including automotive and construction.  

Therefore, the VDI 2230 guideline is required now and in the present day for the safe and reliable design of bolted joints.   Sources and related content

courtesy : TEDx Talks

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2230 ?

Sustainable technology in 2230 will be required everywhere. Here’s why:

• Global Impact: Environmental challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are global issues. Sustainable technologies will be needed everywhere to address these challenges effectively.  
• Interconnectedness: Our world is increasingly interconnected. The actions of one country or region can have significant impacts on others. Therefore, a global effort towards sustainable technology is crucial.  
• Resource Distribution: Many resources are unevenly distributed across the globe. Sustainable technologies can help to ensure equitable access to resources and improve the quality of life for people in all regions.  

Some specific examples of where sustainable technology will be required include:

• Energy Production: Renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal power will be essential in all regions.
• Agriculture: Sustainable farming practices, including precision agriculture and vertical farming, will be needed to feed a growing global population.
• Transportation: Electric vehicles, public transportation, and other sustainable transportation options will be crucial for reducing emissions and improving air quality in cities and around the world.
• Waste Management: Advanced waste management systems, including recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy technologies, will be needed to reduce waste and minimize environmental impact.
• Water Management: Sustainable water management practices, including water conservation, water treatment, and desalination technologies, will be essential for ensuring access to clean water for all.  

In conclusion, sustainable technology in 2230 will be required everywhere to create a just, equitable, and sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2230 ?

Sustainable technology in 2230 will be required in several ways:

• Regulatory Compliance: Governments will likely implement stricter environmental regulations, making the adoption of sustainable technologies mandatory for businesses and industries.  
• Consumer Demand: Increasingly, consumers will demand products and services from companies that prioritize sustainability. This will drive businesses to adopt sustainable technologies to remain competitive.  
• Resource Scarcity: As resources become scarcer, the need for efficient and sustainable technologies will become more critical. Technologies that minimize waste and maximize resource utilization will be essential for survival.
• Climate Change Mitigation: The urgent need to address climate change will necessitate the widespread adoption of sustainable technologies across all sectors of the economy.  

In essence, sustainable technology in 2230 will be required by a combination of regulatory pressures, consumer demand, resource constraints, and the imperative to mitigate climate change.

It will be integrated into every aspect of society, from energy production and transportation to agriculture and manufacturing.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2230 ?

Case Study: Sustainable Technology in 2230: The Case of “Neo-Terra”

Scenario:

The year is 2230. The world has undergone significant changes due to climate change, resource depletion, and rapid population growth. In this context, a fictional city-state named “Neo-Terra” emerges as a beacon of sustainable living.

Key Features of Neo-Terra:

1. Self-Sustaining Ecosystem:
   • Vertical Farming: Skyscrapers are transformed into vertical farms, utilizing hydroponics and aeroponics to grow a variety of crops efficiently.
   • Closed-Loop Waste Management: All waste products are recycled or repurposed. Organic waste is composted to fertilize the vertical farms, while inorganic waste is processed into new materials.
   • Renewable Energy Grid: Neo-Terra is powered by a diverse mix of renewable energy sources, including solar, wind, geothermal, and tidal power.
2. Advanced Technologies:
   • AI-Powered Infrastructure: AI optimizes resource allocation, traffic flow, and energy consumption across the city.  
   • 3D Printing: Customized products are 3D printed on demand, reducing waste and transportation needs.  
   • Bio-Inspired Technologies: Buildings are designed to mimic natural systems, such as passive cooling and natural ventilation.
3. Social and Economic Sustainability:
   • Community-Based Economy: Neo-Terra fosters a strong sense of community, with local businesses and cooperatives playing a central role.
   • Universal Basic Income: A universal basic income ensures that all citizens have access to basic necessities, reducing inequality and social unrest.
   • Education and Innovation: A strong emphasis is placed on education and research, fostering innovation in sustainable technologies.

Challenges and Opportunities:

• Initial Investment: Implementing such a complex system requires significant initial investment in infrastructure and technology.
• Social Acceptance: Overcoming resistance to change and encouraging public participation in sustainable practices is crucial.
• Technological Advancements: Continuous research and development are needed to improve existing technologies and develop new solutions to emerging challenges.  

Conclusion:

The case of Neo-Terra illustrates the potential of sustainable technology to create a more equitable and resilient future. By integrating advanced technologies with a strong emphasis on community and social well-being, it is possible to build a thriving society that coexists harmoniously with the environment.

Note: This is a fictional case study. However, it draws inspiration from real-world examples of sustainable cities and emerging technologies.

Further Discussion Points:

• How can we incentivize the development and adoption of sustainable technologies?
• What are the ethical considerations associated with advanced technologies?
• How can we ensure that the benefits of sustainable technology are shared equitably?
• What role can governments, businesses, and individuals play in creating a sustainable future?

This case study can be used as a starting point for discussions on the future of sustainable technology and its potential to address the challenges of the 21st century.Sources and related content

courtesy : Accenture

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2230 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2230: A Vision for the Future

1. Introduction

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2230. It envisions a future where technological advancements are seamlessly integrated with ecological principles, fostering a harmonious coexistence between human civilization and the planet.

2. Key Drivers and Challenges

• Climate Change: The escalating impacts of climate change, including rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and resource depletion, necessitate a radical shift towards sustainable practices.
• Resource Scarcity: The depletion of finite resources, such as fossil fuels and minerals, demands innovative solutions for resource extraction, utilization, and recycling.
• Population Growth: A burgeoning global population exerts increasing pressure on the environment, requiring sustainable solutions for food production, water supply, and energy consumption.
• Technological Advancements: Rapid advancements in fields like artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, and biotechnology offer unprecedented opportunities for developing innovative and sustainable solutions.
• Ethical Considerations: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and mitigating potential negative impacts on human society and the environment are critical ethical considerations.

3. Core Principles of Sustainable Technology in 2230

• Circular Economy: A shift from a linear “take-make-dispose” model to a circular economy where resources are continuously reused, recycled, and regenerated.
• Decentralization and Localization: A move towards decentralized energy production and localized food production systems to reduce reliance on centralized infrastructure and long-distance transportation.
• Biomimicry: Drawing inspiration from nature to develop technologies that mimic natural processes, such as photosynthesis and self-repairing systems.
• Human-Centered Design: Prioritizing human well-being and social equity in the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.
• Technological Convergence: Integrating various technologies, such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and nanotechnology, to create synergistic solutions.

4. Key Areas of Focus

• Renewable Energy:
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Harnessing solar energy in space and transmitting it to Earth via microwave beams.
  • Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC): Utilizing the temperature difference between warm surface water and cold deep water to generate electricity.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Developing high-capacity, long-duration energy storage solutions to overcome the intermittency of renewable energy sources.
• Sustainable Agriculture:
  • Precision Agriculture: Utilizing AI and sensor technologies to optimize crop yields, minimize resource use, and reduce environmental impact.
  • Vertical Farming: Cultivating crops in multi-story structures, maximizing land use and minimizing transportation costs.
  • Cellular Agriculture: Producing meat and other animal products in vitro, reducing the environmental impact of livestock farming.
• Sustainable Materials:
  • Biodegradable Plastics: Developing biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics.
  • Self-Healing Materials: Creating materials that can repair themselves, extending their lifespan and reducing waste.
  • 3D Printing: Utilizing 3D printing for on-demand manufacturing, reducing waste and minimizing transportation.
• Clean Water Technologies:
  • Advanced Water Filtration: Developing innovative technologies for purifying water from various sources, including seawater and wastewater.
  • Water Harvesting: Implementing efficient water harvesting and storage systems to maximize water utilization.
• Sustainable Transportation:
  • Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Transitioning to electric and autonomous vehicles to reduce emissions and improve traffic flow.
  • High-Speed Rail: Expanding high-speed rail networks to reduce reliance on air travel.
  • Drone Delivery: Utilizing drones for efficient and localized delivery of goods, reducing the need for long-distance transportation.

5. Challenges and Considerations

• Ethical Implications: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and mitigating potential negative impacts on human society and the environment.
• Economic Feasibility: Making sustainable technologies economically viable and accessible to all.
• Social Acceptance: Fostering public awareness and acceptance of new technologies and sustainable practices.
• Policy and Governance: Establishing effective policies and regulatory frameworks to incentivize the development and adoption of sustainable technologies.
• Research and Development: Continued investment in research and development to advance the frontiers of sustainable technology.

6. Conclusion

Sustainable technology in 2230 will be crucial for addressing the pressing challenges of the 21st century. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing sustainability, humanity can create a future where technological advancement and environmental stewardship coexist harmoniously.

7. Recommendations

• Increased investment in research and development of sustainable technologies.
• Development of robust policy frameworks to incentivize the adoption of sustainable technologies.
• Fostering public awareness and education on the importance of sustainability.
• Promoting international cooperation and knowledge sharing in the field of sustainable technology.
• Prioritizing ethical considerations in the development and deployment of new technologies.

This white paper provides a high-level overview of the potential landscape of sustainable technology in 2230. It is intended to stimulate discussion and inspire further research and development in this critical area.

Disclaimer: This white paper presents a vision of the future and is based on current trends and projections. The actual development of sustainable technology may differ significantly from the scenarios presented here.

This white paper provides a basic framework for understanding the potential of sustainable technology in 2230. It can be further expanded upon by incorporating specific case studies, analyzing potential economic and social impacts, and exploring the role of different stakeholders in driving the transition towards a sustainable future.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2230 ?

Industrial Applications of Sustainable Technology in 2230

By 2230, sustainable technology will be deeply integrated into industrial processes, revolutionizing how we produce and consume goods. Here are some key applications:

1. Manufacturing:

• AI-Powered Manufacturing: Artificial intelligence will optimize production lines, predict maintenance needs, and minimize waste through predictive analytics.  
• 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: On-demand manufacturing will reduce transportation needs and material waste, enabling customized products and localized production.  
• Bio-based Materials: Industrial processes will increasingly utilize bio-based materials like bioplastics, biofuels, and bio-based composites, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing environmental impact.
• Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Industries will embrace circular economy principles, minimizing waste by reusing, recycling, and repurposing materials within the production process.

2. Energy:

• Renewable Energy Integration: Industries will heavily rely on renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal power, potentially through microgrids and on-site generation.
• Energy Efficiency: Advanced technologies like AI-powered control systems will optimize energy consumption across industrial processes, minimizing waste and reducing operational costs.  
• Carbon Capture and Storage: Technologies for capturing and storing carbon emissions will be widely implemented in energy-intensive industries to mitigate climate change.  

3. Agriculture:

• Precision Agriculture: AI and sensor technologies will be used to optimize irrigation, fertilization, and pest control, maximizing yields while minimizing environmental impact.  
• Vertical Farming: High-rise farms will utilize controlled environments and hydroponics to grow crops efficiently in urban areas, reducing transportation costs and land use.
• Biotechnology in Agriculture: Gene editing and other biotechnological advancements will improve crop yields, enhance drought resistance, and reduce the need for pesticides.

4. Transportation:

• Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: The industrial sector will transition to electric and autonomous vehicles for logistics and transportation, reducing emissions and improving efficiency.
• Drone Delivery: Drones will be utilized for efficient and localized delivery of goods, minimizing the need for long-distance transportation.

5. Construction:

• Sustainable Building Materials: Construction will increasingly utilize sustainable materials like bamboo, hempcrete, and recycled building materials.
• Prefabrication and Modular Construction: Off-site construction will minimize waste and improve efficiency, reducing the environmental impact of building projects.  
• Smart Buildings: Buildings will be equipped with sensors and AI to optimize energy consumption, water usage, and indoor environmental quality.

6. Resource Management:

• Waste-to-Energy Technologies: Technologies that convert waste into energy will be widely implemented, reducing landfill waste and providing a sustainable source of energy.
• Water Treatment and Reuse: Advanced water treatment technologies will enable the reuse of wastewater for industrial processes, reducing reliance on freshwater resources.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology will transform industrial processes in 2230. By embracing innovation and prioritizing sustainability, industries can play a crucial role in creating a more sustainable and equitable future.

Note: This is a forward-looking perspective. The actual development and implementation of these technologies may vary depending on various factors such as technological advancements, economic conditions, and policy decisions.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2230 ?

Research and development (R&D) of sustainable technology in 2230 will likely be characterized by:

• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: R&D efforts will involve a diverse range of disciplines, including engineering, biology, materials science, computer science, and social sciences.  
• Focus on Systemic Solutions: Research will shift from individual technologies to integrated systems that address complex challenges like climate change, resource scarcity, and social inequality. For example, research on renewable energy will not be limited to solar panels, but will encompass energy storage, grid integration, and societal impact.
• Biomimicry and Nature-Inspired Design: Researchers will increasingly draw inspiration from nature to develop sustainable technologies. This includes studying natural systems to understand how they efficiently use resources, adapt to changing conditions, and maintain ecological balance.  
• Circular Economy Principles: R&D will focus on developing technologies that support a circular economy, minimizing waste, maximizing resource utilization, and promoting the reuse and recycling of materials.
• Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations will be integrated into all stages of the R&D process, from initial concept development to technology deployment and impact assessment. This includes ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and mitigating potential negative impacts on human society and the environment.
• Advanced Technologies: R&D will leverage cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, and biotechnology to develop innovative and sustainable solutions. For example, AI can be used to optimize energy use, predict and prevent environmental disasters, and develop new materials with enhanced properties.

Key Areas of R&D:

• Renewable Energy: Developing next-generation solar cells, wind turbines, and energy storage technologies.  
• Sustainable Agriculture: Developing drought-resistant crops, improving soil health, and developing alternative protein sources.
• Clean Water Technologies: Developing advanced water filtration and desalination technologies, and improving water management practices.
• Sustainable Materials: Developing biodegradable plastics, self-healing materials, and other materials with reduced environmental impact.
• Biotechnology: Developing new medicines, biofuels, and other products using biotechnology.
• Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability: Utilizing AI for environmental monitoring, climate modeling, and optimizing resource use.  

Challenges and Considerations:

• Funding and Investment: Securing adequate funding for long-term, high-risk research and development projects.
• Talent Development: Cultivating a diverse and skilled workforce with expertise in sustainable technology.
• Public Awareness and Engagement: Fostering public understanding and support for sustainable technologies.
• International Cooperation: Promoting international collaboration and knowledge sharing in sustainable technology research.

Conclusion:

Research and development will play a critical role in shaping the future of sustainable technology. By embracing interdisciplinary approaches, focusing on systemic solutions, and prioritizing ethical considerations, researchers can develop innovative and impactful technologies that address the pressing challenges of the 21st century.

Note: This is a forward-looking perspective. The actual direction of R&D will depend on various factors, including technological advancements, economic conditions, and societal priorities.Sources and related content

courtesy : GetSmarter

References

^ Tilman, David; Balzer, Christian; Hill, Jason; Befort, Belinda L. (2011-12-13). “Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (50): 20260–20264. doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3250154. PMID 22106295.

^ “about”. www.csus.edu. Retrieved 2016-04-04.

^ “about”. www.csus.edu. Retrieved 2016-04-04.

^ “A Multi-Trophic Sustainable Food Production System Integrating Aquaponics and Bio-Waste Recycling| Research Project Database | NCER | ORD | US EPA”. cfpub.epa.gov. Retrieved 2016-05-08.

^ “Epicure Catering at Sacramento State”. www.dining.csus.edu. Retrieved 2016-05-08.

^ “Dining Commons”. www.dining.csus.edu. Retrieved 2016-05-08.

^ “A Multi-Trophic Sustainable Food Production System Integrating Aquaponics and Bio-Waste Recycling”. cfpub.epa.gov. Retrieved 2016-05-31.

^ “A Multi-Trophic Sustainable Food Production System Integrating Aquaponics and Bio-Waste Recycling| Research Project Database | NCER | ORD | US EPA”. cfpub.epa.gov. Retrieved 2016-05-08.

^ “aquaponics”. www.csus.edu. Retrieved 2016-04-04.

^ “Sac State Continues Tradition of a Green Campus” (Press release).

^ Biodiesel Benefits and Considerations

^ Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels

^ Jump up to:^a b Comparison of the performance and emissions of different biodiesel blends against petroleum diesel

^ Vermiculture, STORC

^ “CORNELL Composting – Compost Microorganisms”. compost.css.cornell.edu. Retrieved 2016-05-09.

^ “How Composting Works”. HowStuffWorks. 2001-04-02. Retrieved 2016-05-09.

^ Moyle, Peter (2002). Inland Fishes of California. Berkeley: University of California Press.

^ Miller, Chris (2011). “Preliminary Report on Feed Trials of Sacramento Perch” (PDF). Fisheries Science.  Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.

^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.

^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.

^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.

^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.

^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.

^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.

^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.

^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.

^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.

^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.

^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.

^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher

^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)

^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.

^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.

^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.

^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.

^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.

^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972

^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.

^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.

^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.

^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.

^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.

^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)

^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.

^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals

^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.

^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.

^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.

^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.

^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.

^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.

^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.

^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.

^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.

^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.

^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.

^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}

^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine

^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.

^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB

^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.

^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.

^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.

^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.

^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.

^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.

^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.

^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.

^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.

^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.

^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.

^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.

^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.

^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.

^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.

^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.

^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.

^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.

^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.