Sustainable Technology of 2210

Sustainable Technology of 2210 ?

Sustainable Technology of 2210: A Vision of the Future

Sustainable technology in 2210 will likely be radically different from what we know today. It will be characterized by circularity, efficiency, and integration with nature. Here are some potential examples:

1. Self-Sustaining Cities:

• Vertical farms: Skyscrapers dedicated to growing food, eliminating the need for long-distance transportation and reducing the carbon footprint of agriculture.  
• Solar-powered smart grids: Efficient energy distribution systems that store and manage renewable energy, ensuring a constant supply even during peak demand.  
• Waste-to-energy plants: Converting waste into a valuable resource, such as electricity or fuel, minimizing landfill waste and pollution.  

2. Advanced Materials and Manufacturing:

• 3D-printed biomaterials: Creating customized, biodegradable materials for everything from medical implants to building components.
• Nanotechnology-enabled materials: Developing materials with enhanced properties, such as self-healing concrete or water-repellent fabrics.
• Closed-loop manufacturing: Designing products with recyclability in mind, ensuring that materials are reused and repurposed at the end of their lifecycle.  

3. Clean Energy and Transportation:

• Fusion power: A virtually limitless source of clean energy, offering a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels.  
• Autonomous electric vehicles: Self-driving cars powered by renewable energy, reducing traffic congestion and emissions.
• Hyperloop transportation: High-speed, energy-efficient travel systems connecting cities and reducing the need for air travel.  

4. Biomimicry and Nature-Inspired Solutions:

• Artificial photosynthesis: Mimicking plants to convert sunlight into energy, creating a sustainable fuel source.  
• Biodegradable electronics: Developing electronics made from organic materials that decompose naturally, reducing electronic waste.  
• Sustainable agriculture: Precision farming techniques that optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.  

Key characteristics of sustainable technology in 2210:

• Resource efficiency: Minimizing waste and maximizing the use of resources.  
• Renewable energy: Relying on clean and renewable energy sources.
• Circular economy: Designing products and systems for reuse and recycling.  
• Integration with nature: Working with natural systems rather than against them.  

While these are just a few examples, sustainable technology in 2210 will likely be even more advanced and integrated into our daily lives. It will be essential for creating a more sustainable and equitable future for all.

futuristic, sustainable city with vertical farms, solar panels, and autonomous vehicles

Would you like to explore any of these concepts in more detail?Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2210 ?

Sustainable Technology of 2210: A Vision of the Future

Sustainable technology in 2210 will likely be radically different from what we know today. It will be characterized by circularity, efficiency, and integration with nature. Here are some potential examples:

1. Self-Sustaining Cities:

• Vertical farms: Skyscrapers dedicated to growing food, eliminating the need for long-distance transportation and reducing the carbon footprint of agriculture.  
• Solar-powered smart grids: Efficient energy distribution systems that store and manage renewable energy, ensuring a constant supply even during peak demand.  
• Waste-to-energy plants: Converting waste into a valuable resource, such as electricity or fuel, minimizing landfill waste and pollution.  

2. Advanced Materials and Manufacturing:

• 3D-printed biomaterials: Creating customized, biodegradable materials for everything from medical implants to building components.
• Nanotechnology-enabled materials: Developing materials with enhanced properties, such as self-healing concrete or water-repellent fabrics.
• Closed-loop manufacturing: Designing products with recyclability in mind, ensuring that materials are reused and repurposed at the end of their lifecycle.  

3. Clean Energy and Transportation:

• Fusion power: A virtually limitless source of clean energy, offering a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels.  
• Autonomous electric vehicles: Self-driving cars powered by renewable energy, reducing traffic congestion and emissions.
• Hyperloop transportation: High-speed, energy-efficient travel systems connecting cities and reducing the need for air travel.  

4. Biomimicry and Nature-Inspired Solutions:

• Artificial photosynthesis: Mimicking plants to convert sunlight into energy, creating a sustainable fuel source.  
• Biodegradable electronics: Developing electronics made from organic materials that decompose naturally, reducing electronic waste.  
• Sustainable agriculture: Precision farming techniques that optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.  

Key characteristics of sustainable technology in 2210:

• Resource efficiency: Minimizing waste and maximizing the use of resources.  
• Renewable energy: Relying on clean and renewable energy sources.
• Circular economy: Designing products and systems for reuse and recycling.  
• Integration with nature: Working with natural systems rather than against them.  

Would you like to explore any of these concepts in more detail?Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2210 ?

The “Sustainable Technology of 2210” you’re referring to is a hypothetical concept, not a specific job title or academic program.

However, in the context of developing and implementing such future technologies, a wide range of professionals will be crucial:

• Scientists and Engineers:
  • Materials Scientists: Developing new materials with enhanced properties (e.g., self-healing, biodegradable).
  • Bioengineers: Designing and engineering biological systems for sustainable applications (e.g., biofuels, bioremediation).  
  • Environmental Engineers: Developing and implementing technologies for clean water, waste management, and pollution control.  
  • Energy Engineers: Researching and developing renewable energy sources (e.g., solar, wind, geothermal, fusion).  
  • Computer Scientists: Developing AI and machine learning algorithms for optimizing energy use, predicting environmental impacts, and designing smart grids.
  • Robotics Engineers: Designing and building robots for sustainable agriculture, manufacturing, and environmental cleanup.
• Technologists and Technicians:
  • Renewable Energy Technicians: Installing and maintaining solar panels, wind turbines, and other renewable energy systems.  
  • Environmental Technicians: Monitoring environmental conditions, collecting data, and conducting environmental assessments.  
  • Manufacturing Technicians: Operating and maintaining advanced manufacturing equipment for sustainable production.
• Business and Policy Professionals:
  • Sustainability Managers: Developing and implementing sustainability strategies for businesses and organizations.  
  • Environmental Policy Analysts: Conducting research and developing policies to promote sustainable development.  
  • Green Entrepreneurs: Starting and running businesses that develop and market sustainable products and services.
• Social Scientists and Humanists:
  • Environmental Sociologists: Studying human-environment interactions and the social impacts of environmental change.  
  • Environmental Economists: Developing economic models for sustainable development and evaluating the costs and benefits of environmental policies.  
  • Environmental Educators: Raising awareness about environmental issues and promoting sustainable practices.  

This is not an exhaustive list, and the specific roles and skillsets required will continue to evolve as sustainable technology advances.

Essentially, anyone who contributes to the development, implementation, and promotion of technologies that minimize environmental impact and promote a more sustainable future will be crucial in shaping the “Sustainable Technology of 2210.”Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2210 ?

Sustainable technology in 2210 is urgently required to address the pressing global challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation.

Here’s why:

• Climate Change: The effects of climate change are already being felt worldwide, with rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and disruptions to ecosystems. Sustainable technologies are crucial for mitigating climate change by transitioning to renewable energy sources, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and improving energy efficiency.  
• Resource Depletion: The Earth’s resources are finite. Sustainable technologies are essential for developing more efficient ways to use resources, reducing waste, and promoting a circular economy where materials are reused and repurposed.  
• Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and habitat loss are major environmental challenges. Sustainable technologies can help to clean up pollution, restore ecosystems, and protect biodiversity.  

Delaying the development and implementation of sustainable technologies will only exacerbate these challenges and make it more difficult to create a healthy and prosperous future for humanity.

Therefore, the development and widespread adoption of sustainable technologies are not just desirable, but essential for the long-term well-being of our planet and its inhabitants.Sources and related content

courtesy : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2210 ?

Sustainable technology of 2210 will be required everywhere.

• Developed Nations: To mitigate the impacts of climate change, reduce reliance on fossil fuels, and improve resource efficiency.
• Developing Nations: To leapfrog traditional, unsustainable infrastructure and build resilient, environmentally friendly communities.
• Remote and Underserved Areas: To provide access to clean water, renewable energy, and efficient healthcare.
• Global Challenges: To address issues like food security, water scarcity, and biodiversity loss that affect the entire planet.

Essentially, sustainable technology will be crucial for creating a just and equitable future for all people and ensuring the long-term health of the planet.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2210 ?

Sustainable technology in 2210 will be required in several ways:

• Regulatory Mandates: Governments will likely enact stricter regulations on environmental impact, forcing businesses and individuals to adopt sustainable technologies to comply. This could include:
  • Carbon taxes: Placing a price on carbon emissions, incentivizing the adoption of low-carbon technologies.  
  • Emission standards: Setting limits on pollution levels, forcing industries to adopt cleaner technologies.
  • Regulations on resource use: Enforcing stricter regulations on the use of water, energy, and other natural resources.
• Market Demand: Consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable products and services. Businesses that embrace sustainable technologies will gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace.
  • Consumer preferences: Consumers are more likely to choose products and services from companies with strong sustainability records.  
  • Investor pressure: Investors are increasingly looking for companies with strong environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance.  
• Social Pressure: Growing public awareness of environmental issues will put pressure on businesses and governments to adopt sustainable technologies.
  • Social movements: Environmental movements will continue to advocate for the adoption of sustainable technologies and hold businesses and governments accountable for their environmental impact.
  • Public opinion: Public opinion will increasingly favor policies and technologies that promote sustainability.
• Resource Scarcity: As resources become scarcer, the need for sustainable technologies will become more urgent.
  • Water scarcity: The increasing scarcity of water will necessitate the development of technologies for water conservation and desalination.  
  • Energy scarcity: The growing demand for energy will require a transition to renewable energy sources and more efficient energy use.  

These factors will combine to create a strong demand for sustainable technology in 2210, driving innovation and accelerating the transition to a more sustainable future.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2210 ?

Case Study: Sustainable Technology in 2210 – The Case of “Neo-Kyoto”

Scenario:

The year is 2210. The once-bustling metropolis of Kyoto, Japan, has undergone a remarkable transformation. Ravaged by a series of devastating natural disasters in the late 21st century, the city was forced to reimagine itself. Instead of rebuilding with traditional methods, Kyoto embraced a radical vision: to become a model of sustainable living, a “Neo-Kyoto.”

Key Features of Neo-Kyoto:

• Self-Sustaining Ecosystem:
  • Vertical Farms: Skyscrapers are now vertical farms, cultivating a diverse range of crops year-round using hydroponics and artificial lighting. This eliminates the need for long-distance food transportation and reduces the city’s ecological footprint.  
  • Bio-remediation Systems: Advanced wastewater treatment plants utilize biological processes to purify water and generate biogas, which is used to power the city’s transportation network.
  • Waste-to-Energy Conversion: All organic waste is converted into compost for the vertical farms or processed into renewable energy sources.
• Advanced Infrastructure:
  • Smart Grid: A decentralized, AI-powered energy grid efficiently manages renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal power, ensuring a constant supply even during peak demand.
  • Autonomous Public Transportation: A network of driverless electric vehicles and high-speed maglev trains connects the city efficiently and reduces the need for private car ownership.
  • 3D-Printed Buildings: Buildings are constructed using 3D-printed bio-composites, reducing construction waste and minimizing environmental impact.
• Social and Cultural Integration:
  • Community Gardens: Residents actively participate in community gardens, growing their own food and fostering a connection with nature.
  • Educational Programs: The city prioritizes environmental education, teaching residents about sustainable living practices and the importance of environmental stewardship.
  • Eco-tourism: Neo-Kyoto has become a global hub for eco-tourism, attracting visitors from around the world to experience its innovative sustainability solutions.

Challenges and Considerations:

• Initial Investment: The transition to a sustainable city required significant initial investment in infrastructure and technology.
• Social Acceptance: Overcoming resistance to change and encouraging public participation in sustainable practices was crucial.
• Technological Advancements: Continuous research and development were necessary to ensure the city’s infrastructure remained cutting-edge and adaptable to future needs.

Outcomes:

Neo-Kyoto has become a global beacon of sustainability, demonstrating that a harmonious coexistence between humans and the environment is possible. The city has not only recovered from past disasters but has thrived, showcasing a model for other urban centers to emulate.

This case study highlights the potential of sustainable technology to:

• Create resilient and self-sufficient communities.
• Mitigate the impacts of climate change.
• Improve quality of life for urban residents.
• Foster a deeper connection between humans and the natural world.

Would you like to explore a specific aspect of this case study further, such as the economic implications, social challenges, or technological advancements involved?

courtesy : RBC

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2210 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2210 – A Vision for the Future

1. Introduction

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2210, envisioning a future where human civilization thrives in harmony with the planet. By 2210, technological advancements will have revolutionized our approach to sustainability, moving beyond mere mitigation to a proactive, regenerative relationship with the environment.

2. Key Principles of Sustainable Technology in 2210

• Circular Economy: The cornerstone of sustainable technology in 2210 will be the circular economy. This paradigm shifts from a linear “take-make-dispose” model to a cyclical system where resources are continuously reused, repurposed, and regenerated.
• Biomimicry: Drawing inspiration from nature, technologies will mimic natural processes like photosynthesis, water filtration, and self-repairing systems. This will lead to more efficient, resilient, and sustainable solutions.
• Decentralization and Localism: A shift towards decentralized systems will empower local communities to become more self-sufficient. This includes localized energy production (e.g., microgrids), localized food production (e.g., vertical farming), and localized waste management.
• Human-Centered Design: Technology will be designed with human well-being and social equity at its core, ensuring that advancements benefit all of humanity and contribute to a just and equitable society.
• Technological Convergence: The convergence of various technologies, such as nanotechnology, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and renewable energy, will unlock unprecedented possibilities for sustainable innovation.

3. Key Technological Advancements

• Renewable Energy Dominance: Fusion power will likely be a major source of clean energy, providing abundant and affordable energy for all. Solar, wind, and geothermal energy will also be further integrated into the energy grid, complemented by advanced energy storage solutions.
• Advanced Materials: Self-healing materials, bio-based materials, and nanomaterials will revolutionize manufacturing, construction, and various industries.
• Precision Agriculture: AI-powered precision agriculture will optimize resource use, minimize environmental impact, and increase food production to meet the needs of a growing global population.
• Clean Water Technologies: Advanced water filtration systems, desalination technologies, and water reuse strategies will ensure access to clean water for all.
• Space-Based Technologies: Space-based solar power, asteroid mining, and space-based manufacturing could provide new avenues for sustainable resource utilization and energy generation.

4. Societal Implications

• Shift in Economic Models: The transition to a circular economy will necessitate a shift from a linear, consumption-based economy to a regenerative, value-based economy.
• New Job Markets: The development and implementation of sustainable technologies will create new job opportunities in sectors such as renewable energy, green technology, and environmental restoration.
• Increased Quality of Life: Sustainable technologies will improve human well-being by providing access to clean air, clean water, healthy food, and a healthy environment.
• Global Collaboration: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require international cooperation and the sharing of knowledge and technology.

5. Challenges and Considerations

• Ethical Considerations: Ensuring the equitable distribution of benefits and the ethical development and deployment of sustainable technologies will be crucial.
• Technological Limitations: Some technological breakthroughs may face significant technical challenges and require substantial research and development.
• Social and Political Barriers: Overcoming social inertia, political resistance, and entrenched interests will be essential for the widespread adoption of sustainable technologies.
• Unforeseen Consequences: It is crucial to anticipate and mitigate potential unintended consequences of emerging technologies.

6. Conclusion

Sustainable technology in 2210 will be the cornerstone of a thriving and sustainable human civilization. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing human well-being, we can create a future where technology empowers us to live in harmony with the planet.

Disclaimer: This white paper presents a speculative vision of the future. The actual development and implementation of sustainable technologies will depend on a variety of factors, including scientific breakthroughs, technological advancements, economic conditions, and societal choices.

Note: This is a brief outline. A full white paper would include detailed analysis, data, and citations to support the arguments presented.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2210 ?

In 2210, industrial applications of sustainable technology will be deeply integrated, transforming traditional manufacturing processes. Here are some key examples:

• Circular Manufacturing:
  • Closed-Loop Systems: Industries will operate within closed-loop systems, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization. This involves:
    • Product Design for Disassembly: Products will be designed for easy disassembly and recycling, with components made from renewable or recycled materials.
    • Industrial Symbiosis: Waste from one industry will become a valuable resource for another, creating interconnected industrial ecosystems.  
    • 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: On-demand manufacturing will minimize waste by producing only what is needed, reducing transportation and inventory costs.  
• Renewable Energy Integration:
  • On-site Renewable Energy Generation: Industries will increasingly rely on on-site renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal power.
  • Energy Efficiency Upgrades: Industries will implement advanced energy-efficient technologies, such as:
    • High-efficiency motors and drives: Reducing energy consumption in machinery.
    • Waste heat recovery systems: Capturing and utilizing waste heat from industrial processes.  
    • Building automation systems: Optimizing energy use in industrial facilities.  
• Biotechnology and Biomimicry:
  • Bio-based Materials: Industries will utilize bio-based materials like bioplastics, biofuels, and bio-based chemicals, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing environmental impact.
  • Bioremediation: Biotechnological solutions will be used to clean up industrial waste and remediate contaminated sites.  
  • Biomimicry in Manufacturing: Industrial processes will be inspired by natural systems, such as:
    • Enzyme catalysis: Utilizing enzymes for efficient and environmentally friendly chemical reactions.  
    • Self-healing materials: Developing materials that can repair themselves, reducing maintenance and waste.  
• Advanced Automation and AI:
  • AI-Powered Optimization: AI will be used to optimize production processes, minimize waste, and improve resource efficiency.  
  • Predictive Maintenance: AI-powered predictive maintenance will minimize equipment downtime and reduce the need for costly repairs.  
  • Robotics and Automation: Advanced robotics will automate many industrial processes, improving safety and efficiency.

Key Considerations:

• Technological Advancement: Continued research and development will be crucial to advance sustainable technologies and overcome technical challenges.
• Economic Viability: Sustainable technologies must be economically competitive to encourage widespread adoption by industries.
• Social and Ethical Implications: Ensuring fair labor practices, equitable access to technology, and minimizing social disruption during the transition to sustainable industrial practices will be essential.

By embracing these and other sustainable technologies, industries in 2210 will play a vital role in creating a more sustainable and prosperous future for all.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2210 ?

Research and development (R&D) will be crucial for shaping the sustainable technologies of 2210. Here’s a look at key areas:

1. Advanced Materials:

• Self-Healing Materials: Research will focus on developing materials that can autonomously repair damage, extending their lifespan and reducing waste.  
• Bio-based Materials: R&D will explore the use of renewable resources like plant-based polymers, mycelium, and algae to create sustainable alternatives to traditional materials like plastics and concrete.
• Nanomaterials: Nanotechnology will enable the creation of materials with enhanced properties, such as increased strength, improved conductivity, and self-cleaning capabilities.  

2. Renewable Energy:

• Fusion Power: Continued research and development of fusion energy is critical to achieving a virtually limitless source of clean energy.  
• Solar Energy: Improving the efficiency of solar cells, developing new materials like perovskites, and integrating solar power into building materials will be key areas of focus.
• Energy Storage: Research will focus on developing more efficient and cost-effective energy storage solutions, such as advanced batteries, supercapacitors, and hydrogen storage technologies.

3. Biotechnology:

• Bioengineering: R&D will focus on developing bioengineered solutions for environmental remediation, such as bioremediation techniques for cleaning up pollution and restoring ecosystems.
• Synthetic Biology: Research in synthetic biology will enable the design and engineering of biological systems for sustainable applications, such as producing biofuels, developing bio-based materials, and improving agricultural productivity.  
• Biomimicry: Scientists will continue to study natural systems and apply their principles to the development of new technologies, such as bio-inspired materials, self-healing systems, and efficient water filtration systems.

4. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning:

• AI-Powered Optimization: AI will be used to optimize energy use, improve resource efficiency, and minimize environmental impact across various sectors.  
• Predictive Maintenance: AI-powered predictive maintenance will help to reduce equipment downtime and minimize waste in industrial processes.  
• Climate Modeling and Prediction: AI will be crucial for developing more accurate climate models and predicting the impacts of climate change.

5. Space-Based Technologies:

• Space Solar Power: Research and development of space-based solar power systems could provide a constant source of clean energy, independent of weather conditions.  
• Asteroid Mining: Research into asteroid mining techniques could provide access to valuable resources, such as rare earth metals, that are scarce on Earth.  
• Space-Based Manufacturing: Space-based manufacturing could enable the production of materials and products in a microgravity environment, with potential benefits for sustainability.  

Key Considerations:

• Interdisciplinary Research: Collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and policymakers will be crucial for successful R&D in sustainable technologies.
• Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations must be integrated into all stages of research and development, ensuring that technologies are developed and deployed responsibly and equitably.
• Long-Term Vision: R&D efforts must be guided by a long-term vision for a sustainable future, with a focus on developing technologies that address the root causes of environmental challenges.

By investing in these and other areas of research and development, we can pave the way for a future where technology empowers us to live in harmony with the planet.Sources and related content

courtesy : DiscoverMHI (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.)

References

1. ^ SAPEA (2020). A sustainable food system for the European Union (PDF). Berlin: SAPEA, Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. p. 22. doi:10.26356/sustainablefood. ISBN 978-3-9820301-7-3.
2. ^ “FOOD SUSTAINABILITY: KEY TO REACH SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS”. BCFN Foundation: Food and Nutrition Sustainability Index. 2018-10-01. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
3. ^ “Sustainable food systems” (PDF). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.
4. ^ SAPEA (2020). A sustainable food system for the European Union (PDF). Berlin: SAPEA, Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. p. 39. doi:10.26356/sustainablefood. ISBN 978-3-9820301-7-3.
5. ^ Xu, Xiaoming; Sharma, Prateek; Shu, Shijie; Lin, Tzu-Shun; Ciais, Philippe; Tubiello, Francesco N.; Smith, Pete; Campbell, Nelson; Jain, Atul K. (September 2021). “Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods”. Nature Food. 2 (9): 724–732. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x. hdl:2164/18207. ISSN 2662-1355. PMID 37117472. S2CID 240562878.
   News article: “Meat accounts for nearly 60% of all greenhouse gases from food production, study finds”. The Guardian. 13 September 2021. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
6. ^ “If the world adopted a plant-based diet we would reduce global agricultural land use from 4 to 1 billion hectares”. Our World in Data. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
7. ^ “20 meat and dairy firms emit more greenhouse gas than Germany, Britain or France”. The Guardian. 7 September 2021. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
8. ^ Parlasca, Martin C.; Qaim, Matin (5 October 2022). “Meat Consumption and Sustainability”. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 14: 17–41. doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-032340. ISSN 1941-1340.
9. ^ Scarborough, Peter; Clark, Michael; Cobiac, Linda; Papier, Keren; Knuppel, Anika; Lynch, John; Harrington, Richard; Key, Tim; Springmann, Marco (2023). “Vegans, vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters in the UK show discrepant environmental impacts”. Nature Food. 4 (7): 565–574. doi:10.1038/s43016-023-00795-w. PMC 10365988. PMID 37474804.
10. ^ Singh, Brajesh K.; Arnold, Tom; Biermayr-Jenzano, Patricia; Broerse, Jacqueline; Brunori, Gianluca; Caron, Patrick; De Schutter, Olivier; Fan, Shenggen; Fanzo, Jessica; Fraser, Evan; Gurinovic, Mirjana; Hugas, Marta; McGlade, Jacqueline; Nellemann, Christine; Njuki, Jemimah; Sonnino, Roberta; Tuomisto, Hanna L.; Tutundjian, Seta; Webb, Patrick; Wesseler, Justus (November 2021). “Enhancing science–policy interfaces for food systems transformation”. Nature Food. 2 (11): 838–842. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00406-6. ISSN 2662-1355. PMID 37117505. S2CID 243475557.
11. ^ Schipanski, Meagan E.; MacDonald, Graham K.; Rosenzweig, Steven; Chappell, M. Jahi; Bennett, Elena M.; Kerr, Rachel Bezner; Blesh, Jennifer; Crews, Timothy; Drinkwater, Laurie; Lundgren, Jonathan G.; Schnarr, Cassandra (2016-05-04). “Realizing Resilient Food Systems”. BioScience. 66 (7): 600–610. doi:10.1093/biosci/biw052. ISSN 1525-3244.
12. ^ Tendall, D. M.; Joerin, J.; Kopainsky, B.; Edwards, P.; Shreck, A.; Le, Q. B.; Kruetli, P.; Grant, M.; Six, J. (2015-10-01). “Food system resilience: Defining the concept”. Global Food Security. 6: 17–23. Bibcode:2015GlFS….6…17T. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2015.08.001. ISSN 2211-9124.
13. ^ “2022 Global Food Policy Report: Climate Change and Food Systems – World | ReliefWeb”. reliefweb.int. 15 May 2022. Retrieved 2023-02-21.
14. ^ Sustainable food systems Concept and framework (PDF) (Report). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
15. ^ “Toward a Healthy, Sustainable Food System (Policy Number: 200712)”. American Public Health Association. 2007-06-11. Retrieved 2008-08-18.
16. ^ SAPEA (2020). A sustainable food system for the European Union (PDF). Berlin: SAPEA, Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. p. 68. doi:10.26356/sustainablefood. ISBN 978-3-9820301-7-3.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Greene, Charles; Scott-Buechler, Celina; Hausner, Arjun; Johnson, Zackary; Lei, Xin Gen; Huntley, Mark (2022). “Transforming the Future of Marine Aquaculture: A Circular Economy Approach”. Oceanography: 26–34. doi:10.5670/oceanog.2022.213. ISSN 1042-8275.
18. ^ Garnett, Tara (February 2013). “Food sustainability: problems, perspectives and solutions”. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 72 (1): 29–39. doi:10.1017/S0029665112002947. ISSN 0029-6651. PMID 23336559.
19. ^ Mason, J. & Singer, P. (2006). The Way We Eat: Why Our Food Choices Matter. London: Random House. ISBN 1-57954-889-X
20. ^ Rosane, Olivia (29 November 2018). “Our Food Systems Are Failing Us’: 100+ Academies Call for Overhaul of Food Production”. Ecowatch. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
21. ^ Rajão, Raoni; Soares-Filho, Britaldo; Nunes, Felipe; Börner, Jan; Machado, Lilian; Assis, Débora; Oliveira, Amanda; Pinto, Luis; Ribeiro, Vivian; Rausch, Lisa; Gibbs, Holly; Figueira, Danilo (17 July 2020). “The rotten apples of Brazil’s agribusiness”. Science. 369 (6501): 246–248. Bibcode:2020Sci…369..246R. doi:10.1126/science.aba6646. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 32675358. S2CID 220548355.
22. ^ “Amazon soya and beef exports ‘linked to deforestation'”. BBC News. 17 July 2020.
23. ^ zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K. H. J.; Godar, Javier; Lathuillière, Michael J.; Löfgren, Pernilla; Gardner, Toby; Vasconcelos, André; Meyfroidt, Patrick (15 December 2020). “The origin, supply chain, and deforestation risk of Brazil’s beef exports”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (50): 31770–31779. Bibcode:2020PNAS..11731770Z. doi:10.1073/pnas.2003270117. PMC 7749302. PMID 33262283.
24. ^ McCoy, Terrence; Ledur, Júlia. “How Americans’ love of beef is helping destroy the Amazon rainforest”. Washington Post. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
25. ^ Nestle, Marion. (2013). Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health.” Los Angeles, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-27596-6
26. ^ (1993); Schnitkey, G.D., Miranda, M.; “The Impact of Pollution Controls on Livestock Crop producers”, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
27. ^ “Reducing global food system emissions key to meeting climate goals”. phys.org. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
28. ^ Clark, Michael A.; Domingo, Nina G. G.; Colgan, Kimberly; Thakrar, Sumil K.; Tilman, David; Lynch, John; Azevedo, Inês L.; Hill, Jason D. (6 November 2020). “Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets”. Science. 370 (6517): 705–708. Bibcode:2020Sci…370..705C. doi:10.1126/science.aba7357. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 33154139. S2CID 226254942. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
29. ^ Hossain, Naomi. “Inequality, Hunger, and Malnutrition: Power Matters”.
30. ^ “Exploring America’s Food Deserts”. The Annie E. Tracey Foundations. 14 February 2021.
31. ^ Dutko, Paula; Ver Ploeg, Michele; Farrigan, Tracey. “Characteristics and Influential Factors of Food Deserts” (PDF). usda.gov.
32. ^ Pothukuchi, Kameshwari; Kaufman, Jerome L. (1999-06-01). “Placing the food system on the urban agenda: The role of municipal institutions in food systems planning”. Agriculture and Human Values. 16 (2): 213–224. doi:10.1023/A:1007558805953. ISSN 1572-8366. S2CID 91181337.
33. ^ Hossain, Naomi. “Inequality, Hunger, and Malnutrition: Power Matters”.
34. ^ Hager, Erin R; Cockerham, Alexandra; O’Reilly, Nicole; Harrington, Donna; Harding, James; Hurley, Kristen M; Black, Maureen M (2017). “Food swamps and food deserts in Baltimore City, MD, USA: associations with dietary behaviours among urban adolescent girls”. Public Health Nutr. 20 (14): 2598–2607. doi:10.1017/S1368980016002123. PMC 5572508. PMID 27652511.
35. ^ Ebel, Roland (2020). “Are Small Farms Sustainable by Nature?”. Challenges in Sustainability. 8 (1). doi:10.12924/cis2020.08010017. S2CID 216488481.
36. ^ “Industrial Agriculture and Small-scale Farming”. globalagriculture.org.
37. ^ “The Number of Farms in the World Is Declining, Here’s Why It Matters to You”. Environmental News Network.
38. ^ Booth, Amy. “The reason we’re running out of farmers”.
39. ^ “A Year in the Lives of Smallholder Farmers”. worldbank.org.
40. ^ Dias, Lino Miguel; Kaplan, Robert S.; Singh, Harmanpreet (24 August 2021). “Making Small Farms More Sustainable — and Profitable”. Harvard Business Review.
41. ^ Ricciardi, Vincent; Mehrabi, Zia; Wittman, Hannah; James, Dana; Ramankutty, Navin (2021). “Higher yields and more biodiversity on smaller farms”. Nature Sustainability. 4 (7): 651–657. Bibcode:2021NatSu…4..651R. doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00699-2. S2CID 232360314.
42. ^ Fanzo, Jessica. “From big to small: the significance of smallholder farms in the global food system”. The Lancet.
43. ^ Abbot, Chuck (27 February 2023). “U.S. AND EU, AGRICULTURAL GIANTS WITH FEWER AND FEWER FARMERS”. Successful Farming.
44. ^ (2001); Bjorndal, T., “The Competitiveness of the Chilean Salmon Aquaculture Industry”, Foundation for Research in Economics and Business Administration, Bergen, Norway
45. ^ (1996); Kuhnlein, H.V., Receveur, O.; Dietary Change and Traditional Food Systems of Indigenous Peoples; Centre for Nutrition and the Environment of Indigenous Peoples, and School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
46. ^ Doering, Christopher. “Where the dollars go: Lobbying a big business for large food and beverage CPGs”. fooddive.com. Food Dive.
47. ^ “Who’s Tipping the Scales?”. ipes-food.org. IPES-Food.
48. ^ Not Fit-for-Purpose The Grand Experiment of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives in Corporate Accountability, Human Rights and Global Governance. San Francisco: Institute for Multi-Stakeholder Initiative Integrity: MSI Integrity. July 2020.
49. ^ Carrington, Damian (23 December 2020). “Organic meat production just as bad for climate, study finds”. The Guardian. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
50. ^ “Organic meats found to have approximately the same greenhouse impact as regular meats”. phys.org. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
51. ^ Pieper, Maximilian; Michalke, Amelie; Gaugler, Tobias (15 December 2020). “Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 6117. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.6117P. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19474-6. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7738510. PMID 33323933.  Available under CC BY 4.0.
52. ^ “Agricultural Nonpoint Source Fact Sheet”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA. 2015-02-20. Retrieved 22 April 2015.
53. ^ “Investigating the Environmental Effects of Agriculture Practices on Natural Resources”. USGS. January 2007, pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2007/3001/pdf/508FS2007_3001.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2018.
54. ^ IPCC (2019). Shukla, P.R.; Skea, J.; Calvo Buendia, E.; Masson-Delmotte, V.; et al. (eds.). IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, polution Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse gas fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (PDF). In press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/srccl/.
55. ^ “Actions on Air Quality. A Global Summary of Policies and Programmes to Reduce Air Pollution”. United Nations Environment Programme. 2024.
56. ^ Stefanovic, Lilliana; Freytag-Leyer, Barbara; Kahl, Johannes (2020). “Food System Outcomes: An Overview and the Contribution to Food Systems Transformation”. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 4. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.546167. ISSN 2571-581X.
57. ^ Leip, Adrian; Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon; Kugelberg, Susanna (1 March 2021). “The role of nitrogen in achieving sustainable food systems for healthy diets”. Global Food Security. 28: 100408. Bibcode:2021GlFS…2800408L. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100408. PMC 7938701. PMID 33738182.
58. ^ Allievi, Francesca; Antonelli, Marta; Dembska, Katarzyna; Principato, Ludovica (2019). “Understanding the Global Food System”. Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals Through Sustainable Food Systems. pp. 3–23. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23969-5_1. ISBN 978-3-030-23968-8.
59. ^ Xia, Lili; Robock, Alan; Scherrer, Kim; Harrison, Cheryl S.; Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon; Weindl, Isabelle; Jägermeyr, Jonas; Bardeen, Charles G.; Toon, Owen B.; Heneghan, Ryan (August 2022). “Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection”. Nature Food. 3 (8): 586–596. doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00573-0. hdl:11250/3039288. ISSN 2662-1355. PMID 37118594. S2CID 251601831.
60. ^ Diaz, Crisandra J.; Douglas, Kai J.; Kang, Kalisa; Kolarik, Ashlynn L.; Malinovski, Rodeon; Torres-Tiji, Yasin; Molino, João V.; Badary, Amr; Mayfield, Stephen P. (2023). “Developing algae as a sustainable food source”. Frontiers in Nutrition. 9. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.1029841. ISSN2296-861X. PMC9892066. PMID36742010.
    • News article about the study: “Nutrient-rich algae could help meet global food demand: Cornell researchers”. CTVNews. 20 October 2022. Retrieved 17 November 2022.
61. ^ Lange, Lene (December 2014). “The importance of fungi and mycology for addressing major global challenges*”. IMA Fungus. 5 (2): 463–471. doi:10.5598/imafungus.2014.05.02.10. ISSN 2210-6340. PMC 4329327. PMID 25734035.
62. ^ Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar; Kumar, Vinay; Hellwig, Coralie; Wikandari, Rachma; Harirchi, Sharareh; Sar, Taner; Wainaina, Steven; Sindhu, Raveendran; Binod, Parameswaran; Zhang, Zengqiang; Taherzadeh, Mohammad J. (1 February 2023). “Filamentous fungi for sustainable vegan food production systems within a circular economy: Present status and future prospects”. Food Research International. 164: 112318. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112318. ISSN 0963-9969. PMID 36737911. S2CID 254518455.
63. ^ Schweiggert-Weisz, Ute; Eisner, Peter; Bader-Mittermaier, Stephanie; Osen, Raffael (1 April 2020). “Food proteins from plants and fungi”. Current Opinion in Food Science. 32: 156–162. doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2020.08.003. ISSN 2214-7993. S2CID 225203498.
64. ^ Weinrich, Ramona (January 2019). “Opportunities for the Adoption of Health-Based Sustainable Dietary Patterns: A Review on Consumer Research of Meat Substitutes”. Sustainability. 11 (15): 4028. doi:10.3390/su11154028. ISSN 2071-1050.
65. ^ Kumar, Pavan; Chatli, M. K.; Mehta, Nitin; Singh, Parminder; Malav, O. P.; Verma, Akhilesh K. (24 March 2017). “Meat analogues: Health promising sustainable meat substitutes”. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 57 (5): 923–932. doi:10.1080/10408398.2014.939739. ISSN 1040-8398. PMID 25898027. S2CID 5445686.
66. ^ Tziva, M.; Negro, S. O.; Kalfagianni, A.; Hekkert, M. P. (1 June 2020). “Understanding the protein transition: The rise of plant-based meat substitutes”. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 35: 217–231. Bibcode:2020EIST…35..217T. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.09.004. ISSN 2210-4224. S2CID 211769379.
67. ^ “High-tech resilient food solutions”. ALLFED – Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disasters. Archived from the original on 2023-09-23. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
68. ^ Steenson, Simon; Buttriss, Judith L. (September 2021). “Healthier and more sustainable diets: What changes are needed in high-income countries?”. Nutrition Bulletin. 46 (3): 279–309. doi:10.1111/nbu.12518. ISSN 1471-9827. S2CID 238695900.
69. ^ Semba, Richard D.; Ramsing, Rebecca; Rahman, Nihaal; Kraemer, Klaus; Bloem, Martin W. (1 March 2021). “Legumes as a sustainable source of protein in human diets”. Global Food Security. 28: 100520. Bibcode:2021GlFS…2800520S. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100520. ISSN 2211-9124. S2CID 233821367.
70. ^ “Sustainable Fishing”. education.nationalgeographic.org. Retrieved 2023-05-11.
71. ^ “Farmed Fish | The ASC Certification Label | Buying Sustainable Aquaculture”. www.foodunfolded.com. Retrieved 2023-05-11.
72. ^ Creative, Grist (2021-06-29). “Consumers are demanding more sustainable seafood — and it’s working”. Grist. Retrieved 2023-05-11.
73. ^ van Huis, Arnold; Gasco, Laura (13 January 2023). “Insects as feed for livestock production”. Science. 379 (6628): 138–139. Bibcode:2023Sci…379..138V. doi:10.1126/science.adc9165. ISSN0036-8075. PMID36634163. S2CID255749691.
    • News article about the study: Yirka, Bob. “Making the case for using insects as food for both humans and livestock”. phys.org. Archived from the original on 28 January 2023. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
74. ^ Domínguez-Oliva, Adriana; Mota-Rojas, Daniel; Semendric, Ines; Whittaker, Alexandra L. (January 2023). “The Impact of Vegan Diets on Indicators of Health in Dogs and Cats: A Systematic Review”. Veterinary Sciences. 10 (1): 52. doi:10.3390/vetsci10010052. ISSN 2306-7381. PMC 9860667. PMID 36669053.
75. ^ “The 6 Best Sustainable Pet Food Brands of 2023”. The Spruce Pets. Retrieved 2023-05-11.
76. ^ Lawton, Graham (19 September 2022). “Vegan pet food: Can cats and dogs be happy and healthy without meat?”. New Scientist. Retrieved 2023-05-11.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parlasca, Martin C.; Qaim, Matin (5 October 2022). “Meat Consumption and Sustainability”. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 14: 17–41. doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-032340. ISSN 1941-1340.
78. ^ Rzymski, Piotr; Kulus, Magdalena; Jankowski, Maurycy; Dompe, Claudia; Bryl, Rut; Petitte, James N.; Kempisty, Bartosz; Mozdziak, Paul (January 2021). “COVID-19 Pandemic Is a Call to Search for Alternative Protein Sources as Food and Feed: A Review of Possibilities”. Nutrients. 13 (1): 150. doi:10.3390/nu13010150. ISSN 2072-6643. PMC 7830574. PMID 33466241.
79. ^ Onwezen, M. C.; Bouwman, E. P.; Reinders, M. J.; Dagevos, H. (1 April 2021). “A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat”. Appetite. 159: 105058. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058. ISSN 0195-6663. PMID 33276014. S2CID 227242500.
80. ^ Humpenöder, Florian; Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon; Weindl, Isabelle; Lotze-Campen, Hermann; Linder, Tomas; Popp, Alexander (May 2022). “Projected environmental benefits of replacing beef with microbial protein”. Nature. 605 (7908): 90–96. Bibcode:2022Natur.605…90H. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04629-w. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 35508780. S2CID 248526001.
    News article: “Replacing some meat with microbial protein could help fight climate change”. Science News. 5 May 2022. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
81. ^ “Lab-grown meat and insects ‘good for planet and health'”. BBC News. 25 April 2022. Retrieved 25 April 2022.
82. ^ Mazac, Rachel; Meinilä, Jelena; Korkalo, Liisa; Järviö, Natasha; Jalava, Mika; Tuomisto, Hanna L. (25 April 2022). “Incorporation of novel foods in European diets can reduce global warming potential, water use and land use by over 80%”. Nature Food. 3 (4): 286–293. doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00489-9. hdl:10138/348140. PMID 37118200. S2CID 257158726. Retrieved 25 April 2022.
83. ^ Leger, Dorian; Matassa, Silvio; Noor, Elad; Shepon, Alon; Milo, Ron; Bar-Even, Arren (29 June 2021). “Photovoltaic-driven microbial protein production can use land and sunlight more efficiently than conventional crops”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118 (26): e2015025118. Bibcode:2021PNAS..11815025L. doi:10.1073/pnas.2015025118. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 8255800. PMID 34155098. S2CID 235595143.
84. ^ Pieper, Maximilian; Michalke, Amelie; Gaugler, Tobias (15 December 2020). “Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 6117. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.6117P. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19474-6. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7738510. PMID 33323933. S2CID 229282344.
85. ^ “Have we reached ‘peak meat’? Why one country is trying to limit its number of livestock”. the Guardian. 2023-01-16. Retrieved 2023-01-16.
86. ^ Fuso Nerini, Francesco; Fawcett, Tina; Parag, Yael; Ekins, Paul (December 2021). “Personal carbon allowances revisited”. Nature Sustainability. 4 (12): 1025–1031. Bibcode:2021NatSu…4.1025F. doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00756-w. ISSN 2398-9629. S2CID 237101457.
87. ^ “A blueprint for scaling voluntary carbon markets | McKinsey”. www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved 2022-06-18.
88. ^ “These are the UK supermarket items with the worst environmental impact”. New Scientist. Retrieved 14 September 2022.
89. ^ Clark, Michael; Springmann, Marco; Rayner, Mike; Scarborough, Peter; Hill, Jason; Tilman, David; Macdiarmid, Jennie I.; Fanzo, Jessica; Bandy, Lauren; Harrington, Richard A. (16 August 2022). “Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (33): e2120584119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11920584C. doi:10.1073/pnas.2120584119. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 9388151. PMID 35939701.
90. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d van den Berg, Saskia W.; van den Brink, Annelien C.; Wagemakers, Annemarie; den Broeder, Lea (2022-01-01). “Reducing meat consumption: The influence of life course transitions, barriers and enablers, and effective strategies according to young Dutch adults”. Food Quality and Preference. 100: 104623. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104623. ISSN 0950-3293. S2CID 248742133.
91. ^ Jump up to:^a b Collier, Elizabeth S.; Oberrauter, Lisa-Maria; Normann, Anne; Norman, Cecilia; Svensson, Marlene; Niimi, Jun; Bergman, Penny (2021-12-01). “Identifying barriers to decreasing meat consumption and increasing acceptance of meat substitutes among Swedish consumers”. Appetite. 167: 105643. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105643. ISSN 0195-6663. PMID 34389377. S2CID 236963808.
92. ^ “Up to 3,000 ‘peak polluters’ given last chance to close by Dutch government”. the Guardian. 2022-11-30. Retrieved 2023-01-16.
93. ^ Fortuna, Carolyn (2022-09-08). “Is It Time To Start Banning Ads For Meat Products?”. CleanTechnica. Retrieved 2022-11-01.
94. ^ “Towards sustainable food consumption – SAPEA”. Retrieved 2023-06-29.
95. ^ “Bovine genomics project at Genome Canada”. Archived from the original on 2019-08-10. Retrieved 2018-11-30.
96. ^ “Canada Is Using Genetics to Make Cows Less Gassy”. Wired. 2017-06-09. Archived from the original on 2023-05-24.
97. ^ Joblin, K. N. (1999). “Ruminal acetogens and their potential to lower ruminant methane emissions”. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 50 (8): 1307. doi:10.1071/AR99004.
98. ^ The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review
99. ^ Parmar, N.R.; Nirmal Kumar, J.I.; Joshi, C.G. (2015). “Exploring diet-dependent shifts in methanogen and methanotroph diversity in the rumen of Mehsani buffalo by a metagenomics approach”. Frontiers in Life Science. 8 (4): 371–378. doi:10.1080/21553769.2015.1063550. S2CID 89217740.
100. ^ Boadi, D (2004). “Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review”. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84 (3): 319–335. doi:10.4141/a03-109.
101. ^ Martin, C. et al. 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4 : pp 351-365.
102. ^ Eckard, R. J.; et al. (2010). “Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review”. Livestock Science. 130 (1–3): 47–56. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.010.
103. ^ Dalal, R.C.; et al. (2003). “Nitrous oxide emission from Australian agricultural lands and mitigation options: a review”. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 41 (2): 165–195. doi:10.1071/sr02064. S2CID 4498983.
104. ^ Klein, C. A. M.; Ledgard, S. F. (2005). “Nitrous oxide emissions from New Zealand agriculture – key sources and mitigation strategies”. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 72 (1): 77–85. Bibcode:2005NCyAg..72…77D. doi:10.1007/s10705-004-7357-z. S2CID 42756018.
105. ^ Gerber, P. J., H. Steinfeld, B. Henderson, A. Mottet, C. Opio, J. Dijkman, A. Falcucci and G. Tempio. 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock – a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 115 pp.
106. ^ Reisinger, Andy; Clark, Harry; Cowie, Annette L.; Emmet-Booth, Jeremy; Gonzalez Fischer, Carlos; Herrero, Mario; Howden, Mark; Leahy, Sinead (2021-11-15). “How necessary and feasible are reductions of methane emissions from livestock to support stringent temperature goals?”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 379 (2210): 20200452. Bibcode:2021RSPTA.37900452R. doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0452. ISSN 1364-503X. PMC 8480228. PMID 34565223.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Soder, K. J.; Brito, A. F. (2023). “Enteric methane emissions in grazing dairy systems”. JDS Communications. 4 (4): 324–328. doi:10.3168/jdsc.2022-0297. PMC 10382831. PMID 37521055.
108. ^ L. Aban, Maita; C. Bestil, Lolito (2016). “Rumen Defaunation: Determining the Level and Frequency of Leucaena leucocephala Linn. Forage” (PDF). International Journal of Food Engineering. 2 (1).
109. ^ Lewis Mernit, Judith (2 July 2018). “How Eating Seaweed Can Help Cows to Belch Less Methane”. Yale School of the Environment. Retrieved 29 January 2022.
110. ^ Axt, Barbara (25 May 2016). “Treating cows with antibiotics doubles dung methane emissions”. New Scientist. Retrieved 5 October 2019.
111. ^ Willis, Katie. “Grazing livestock could reduce greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, study shows”. www.ualberta.ca. Retrieved 2024-04-10.
112. ^ Wang, Yue; de Boer, Imke J. M.; Persson, U. Martin; Ripoll-Bosch, Raimon; Cederberg, Christel; Gerber, Pierre J.; Smith, Pete; van Middelaar, Corina E. (2023-11-22). “Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions”. Nature Communications. 14 (1): 7625. Bibcode:2023NatCo..14.7625W. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43452-3. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 10665458. PMID 37993450.
113. ^ Fassler, Joe (2024-02-01). “Research Undermines Claims that Soil Carbon Can Offset Livestock Emissions”. DeSmog. Retrieved 2024-02-02.
114. ^ Carrington, Damian (2021-09-14). “Nearly all global farm subsidies harm people and planet – UN”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-03-27.
115. ^ “George Monbiot: “Agriculture is arguably the most destructive industry on Earth””. New Statesman. 13 May 2022. Retrieved 4 June 2022.
116. ^ Bager, Simon L.; Persson, U. Martin; dos Reis, Tiago N. P. (19 February 2021). “Eighty-six EU policy options for reducing imported deforestation”. One Earth. 4 (2): 289–306. Bibcode:2021OEart…4..289B. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.01.011. ISSN 2590-3322. S2CID 233930831.
117. ^ Finney, Clare (2021-06-29). “Eat this to save the world! The most sustainable foods – from seaweed to venison”. The Guardian. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
118. ^ “What Is the Most Environmentally Friendly Meat?”. Eco & Beyond. 2021-01-01. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
119. ^ Roberrts, Wayne (2019-12-02). “Is ‘sustainable beef’ a load of bull?”. Corporate Knights. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
120. ^ Stockford, Alexis (2021-10-18). “Sustainable beef interest hits new peak”. Manitoba Co-operator. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
121. ^ Lazarus, Oliver; McDermid, Sonali; Jacquet, Jennifer (2021-03-25). “The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers”. Climatic Change. 165 (1): 30. Bibcode:2021ClCh..165…30L. doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03047-7. ISSN 1573-1480. S2CID 232359749.
122. ^ Christen, Caroline (2021-07-18). “Meat Industry Climate Claims – Criticisms and Concerns”. DeSmog. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
123. ^ “Bovine Genomics | Genome Canada”. www.genomecanada.ca.
124. ^ Airhart, Ellen. “Canada Is Using Genetics to Make Cows Less Gassy”. Wired – via www.wired.com.
125. ^ “The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review”.
126. ^ Parmar, N.R.; Nirmal Kumar, J.I.; Joshi, C.G. (2015). “Exploring diet-dependent shifts in methanogen and methanotroph diversity in the rumen of Mehsani buffalo by a metagenomics approach”. Frontiers in Life Science. 8 (4): 371–378. doi:10.1080/21553769.2015.1063550. S2CID 89217740.
127. ^ “Kowbucha, seaweed, vaccines: the race to reduce cows’ methane emissions”. The Guardian. 30 September 2021. Retrieved 1 December 2021.
128. ^ Dirksen, Neele; Langbein, Jan; Schrader, Lars; Puppe, Birger; Elliffe, Douglas; Siebert, Katrin; Röttgen, Volker; Matthews, Lindsay (13 September 2021). “Learned control of urinary reflexes in cattle to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions”. Current Biology. 31 (17): R1033 – R1034. Bibcode:2021CBio…31R1033D. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.011. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 34520709. S2CID 237497867.
129. ^ Boadi, D (2004). “Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review”. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84 (3): 319–335. doi:10.4141/a03-109.
130. ^ Martin, C. et al. 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4 : pp 351-365.
131. ^ Eckard, R. J.; et al. (2010). “Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review”. Livestock Science. 130 (1–3): 47–56. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.010.
132. ^ “Livestock Production Science | Livestock Farming Systems and their Environmental Impacts | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier”. www.sciencedirect.com.
133. ^ Poore, J.; Nemecek, T. (June 2018). “Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers”. Science. 360 (6392): 987–992. Bibcode:2018Sci…360..987P. doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 29853680. S2CID 206664954.
134. ^ Lamb, Anthony; Green, Rhys; Bateman, Ian; Broadmeadow, Mark; Bruce, Toby; Burney, Jennifer; Carey, Pete; Chadwick, David; Crane, Ellie; Field, Rob; Goulding, Keith (May 2016). “The potential for land sparing to offset greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture”. Nature Climate Change. 6 (5): 488–492. Bibcode:2016NatCC…6..488L. doi:10.1038/nclimate2910. hdl:2164/7643. ISSN 1758-6798. S2CID 86091754.
135. ^ Greenberg, Sarah. “10 Leading Companies in Plant-Based Meat”. blog.bccresearch.com. Retrieved 2021-11-08.
136. ^ Creswell, Julie (2021-10-15). “Plant-Based Food Companies Face Critics: Environmental Advocates”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-11-08.
137. ^ Bryant, Christopher J (3 August 2020). “Culture, meat, and cultured meat”. Journal of Animal Science. 98 (8): skaa172. doi:10.1093/jas/skaa172. ISSN 0021-8812. PMC 7398566. PMID 32745186.
138. ^ Hong, Tae Kyung; Shin, Dong-Min; Choi, Joonhyuk; Do, Jeong Tae; Han, Sung Gu (May 2021). “Current Issues and Technical Advances in Cultured Meat Production: AReview”. Food Science of Animal Resources. 41 (3): 355–372. doi:10.5851/kosfa.2021.e14. ISSN 2636-0772. PMC 8112310. PMID 34017947.
139. ^ Treich, Nicolas (1 May 2021). “Cultured Meat: Promises and Challenges”. Environmental and Resource Economics. 79 (1): 33–61. Bibcode:2021EnREc..79…33T. doi:10.1007/s10640-021-00551-3. ISSN 1573-1502. PMC 7977488. PMID 33758465.
140. ^ Bryant, Christopher J (1 August 2020). “Culture, meat, and cultured meat”. Journal of Animal Science. 98 (8): skaa172. doi:10.1093/jas/skaa172. PMC 7398566. PMID 32745186.
141. ^ Treich, Nicolas (May 2021). “Cultured Meat: Promises and Challenges”. Environmental and Resource Economics. 79 (1): 33–61. Bibcode:2021EnREc..79…33T. doi:10.1007/s10640-021-00551-3. PMC 7977488. PMID 33758465.
142. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Saviolidis, Nína M.; Olafsdottir, Gudrun; Nicolau, Mariana; Samoggia, Antonella; Huber, Elise; Brimont, Laura; Gorton, Matthew; von Berlepsch, David; Sigurdardottir, Hildigunnur; Del Prete, Margherita; Fedato, Cristina; Aubert, Pierre-Marie; Bogason, Sigurdur G. (January 2020). “Stakeholder Perceptions of Policy Tools in Support of Sustainable Food Consumption in Europe: Policy Implications”. Sustainability. 12 (17): 7161. doi:10.3390/su12177161. hdl:11585/776038. ISSN 2071-1050.
143. ^ Stubenrauch, Jessica; Garske, Beatrice; Ekardt, Felix; Hagemann, Katharina (January 2022). “European Forest Governance: Status Quo and Optimising Options with Regard to the Paris Climate Target”. Sustainability. 14 (7): 4365. doi:10.3390/su14074365. ISSN 2071-1050.
144. ^ Mbow et al. 2019, p. 454.
145. ^ “Sustainable Intensification for Smallholders”. Project Drawdown. 2020-02-06. Retrieved 2020-10-16.
146. ^ Kovak, Emma; Blaustein-Rejto, Dan; Qaim, Matin (8 February 2022). “Genetically modified crops support climate change mitigation”. Trends in Plant Science. 27 (7): 627–629. Bibcode:2022TPS….27..627K. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2022.01.004. ISSN 1360-1385. PMID 35148945.
147. ^ Liang, Chanjuan (2016). “Genetically Modified Crops with Drought Tolerance: Achievements, Challenges, and Perspectives”. Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants, Vol 2. Springer International Publishing. pp. 531–547. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32423-4_19. ISBN 978-3-319-32421-0. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
148. ^ Reeve, J. R.; Hoagland, L. A.; Villalba, J. J.; Carr, P. M.; Atucha, A.; Cambardella, C.; Davis, D. R.; Delate, K. (1 January 2016). “Chapter Six – Organic Farming, Soil Health, and Food Quality: Considering Possible Links”. Advances in Agronomy. 137. Academic Press: 319–367. doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2015.12.003.
149. ^ Tully, Katherine L.; McAskill, Cullen (1 September 2020). “Promoting soil health in organically managed systems: a review”. Organic Agriculture. 10 (3): 339–358. Bibcode:2020OrgAg..10..339T. doi:10.1007/s13165-019-00275-1. ISSN 1879-4246. S2CID 209429041.
150. ^ M. Tahat, Monther; M. Alananbeh, Kholoud; A. Othman, Yahia; I. Leskovar, Daniel (January 2020). “Soil Health and Sustainable Agriculture”. Sustainability. 12 (12): 4859. doi:10.3390/su12124859.
151. ^ Brian Moss (12 February 2008). “Water pollution by agriculture”. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363 (1491): 659–66. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2176. PMC 2610176. PMID 17666391.
152. ^ “Social, Cultural, Institutional and Economic Aspects of Eutrophication”. UNEP. Retrieved 14 October 2018.
153. ^ Aktar; et al. (March 2009). “Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards”. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2 (1): 1–12. doi:10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7. PMC 2984095. PMID 21217838.
154. ^ Sharon Oosthoek (17 June 2013). “Pesticides spark broad biodiversity loss”. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.13214. S2CID 130350392. Retrieved 14 October 2018.
155. ^ Jump up to:^a b Seufert, Verena; Ramankutty, Navin (2017). “Many shades of gray — The context-dependent performance of organic agriculture”. Science Advances. 3 (3): e1602638. Bibcode:2017SciA….3E2638S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602638. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 5362009. PMID 28345054.
156. ^ “Organic meats found to have approximately the same greenhouse impact as regular meats”. phys.org. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
157. ^ Jump up to:^a b Pieper, Maximilian; Michalke, Amelie; Gaugler, Tobias (15 December 2020). “Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 6117. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.6117P. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19474-6. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7738510. PMID 33323933.
158. ^ Smith, Laurence G.; Kirk, Guy J. D.; Jones, Philip J.; Williams, Adrian G. (22 October 2019). “The greenhouse gas impacts of converting food production in England and Wales to organic methods”. Nature Communications. 10 (1): 4641. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.4641S. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12622-7. PMC 6805889. PMID 31641128.
159. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d O’Hara, Jeffrey K. “Description of Local Food Systems.” Union of Concerned Scientists, 2011, pp. 6–13
160. ^ “Earth Stats.” Archived 11 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Gardensofbabylon.com. Retrieved on: 7 July 2009.
161. ^ Holmgren, D. (March 2005). “Retrofitting the suburbs for sustainability.” Archived 15 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine CSIRO Sustainability Network. Retrieved on: 7 July 2009.
162. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Shindelar, Rachel. “The Ecological Sustainability of Local Food Systems.” RCC Perspectives, no. 1, 2015, pp. 19–24.
163. ^ Yang, Yi; Campbell, J. Elliott (1 March 2017). “Improving attributional life cycle assessment for decision support: The case of local food in sustainable design”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 145: 361–366. Bibcode:2017JCPro.145..361Y. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.020. ISSN 0959-6526. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
164. ^ Edwards-Jones, Gareth (2010). “Does eating local food reduce the environmental impact of food production and enhance consumer health?”. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 69 (4): 582–591. doi:10.1017/S0029665110002004. ISSN 1475-2719. PMID 20696093.
165. ^ “Climate impact of food miles three times greater than previously believed, study finds”. The Guardian. 20 June 2022. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
166. ^ Jump up to:^a b Li, Mengyu; Jia, Nanfei; Lenzen, Manfred; Malik, Arunima; Wei, Liyuan; Jin, Yutong; Raubenheimer, David (June 2022). “Global food-miles account for nearly 20% of total food-systems emissions”. Nature Food. 3 (6): 445–453. doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00531-w. ISSN 2662-1355. PMID 37118044. S2CID 249916086.
167. ^ “How much do food miles matter and should you buy local produce?”. New Scientist. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
168. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Kling, William. “Food Waste in Distribution and Use.” Journal of Farm Economics, vol. 25, no. 4, 1943, pp. 848–859.
169. ^ Walter, Willett (February 2, 2019). “Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems” (PDF). The Lancet Commissions. 393 (10170): 447–492. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. PMID 30660336. S2CID 58657351.
170. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Pelz, V. H. “Modern Tendencies in Food Distribution.” Journal of Farm Economics, vol. 12, no. 2, 1930, pp. 301–310.
171. ^ McMichael A.J.; Powles J.W.; Butler C.D.; Uauy R. (September 2007). “Food, Livestock Production, Energy, Climate change, and Health” (PDF). Lancet. 370 (9594): 1253–63. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61256-2. hdl:1885/38056. PMID 17868818. S2CID 9316230. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 February 2010. Retrieved on: 18 March 2009.
172. ^ Baroni L.; Cenci L.; Tettamanti M.; Berati M. (February 2007). “Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Various Dietary Patterns Combined with Different Food Production Systems” (PDF). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 61 (2): 279–86. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602522. PMID 17035955. S2CID 16387344. Retrieved on: 18 March 2009.
173. ^ Steinfeld H., Gerber P., Wassenaar T., Castel V., Rosales M., de Haan, C. (2006). “Livestock’s Long Shadow – Environmental Issues and Options”. Retrieved on: 18 March 2009.
174. ^ Heitschmidt R.K.; Vermeire L.T.; Grings E.E. (2004). “Is Rangeland Agriculture Sustainable?”. Journal of Animal Science. 82 (E–Suppl): E138–146. doi:10.2527/2004.8213_supplE138x (inactive 1 November 2024). PMID 15471792. Retrieved on: 18 March 2009.
175. ^ Alexander, Peter; Brown, Calum; Arneth, Almut; Finnigan, John; Rounsevell, Mark D.A. (November 2016). “Human appropriation of land for food: The role of diet”. Global Environmental Change. 41: 88–98. Bibcode:2016GEC….41…88A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.09.005. hdl:20.500.11820/dd522f6a-8cc9-444e-83f8-b73e065bd269.
176. ^ “Sustainable food systems – UNSCN”. www.unscn.org. Retrieved 2019-11-27.
177. ^ Silva, Christianna (2020-09-27). “Food Insecurity In The U.S. By The Numbers”. NPR. Retrieved 2021-10-19.
178. ^ “What is the Global Land Squeeze?”. Land & Carbon Lab. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
179. ^ Hanson, Craig; Ranganathan, Janet (14 February 2022). “How to Manage the Global Land Squeeze? Produce, Protect, Reduce, Restore”. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
180. ^ “Water scarcity predicted to worsen in more than 80% of croplands globally this century”. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 16 May 2022.
181. ^ Liu, Xingcai; Liu, Wenfeng; Tang, Qiuhong; Liu, Bo; Wada, Yoshihide; Yang, Hong (April 2022). “Global Agricultural Water Scarcity Assessment Incorporating Blue and Green Water Availability Under Future Climate Change”. Earth’s Future. 10 (4). Bibcode:2022EaFut..1002567L. doi:10.1029/2021EF002567. S2CID 248398232.
182. ^ “The banks collapsed in 2008 – and our food system is about to do the same | George Monbiot”. The Guardian. 19 May 2022. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
183. ^ Merkle, Magnus; Moran, Dominic; Warren, Frances; Alexander, Peter (September 2021). “How does market power affect the resilience of food supply?”. Global Food Security. 30: 100556. Bibcode:2021GlFS…3000556M. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100556. hdl:20.500.11820/0fd7b207-fb9d-4547-8580-ba1f016a4b44.
184. ^ Rushcheva, D. (November 2, 2020). “Food Production and National Food Security: Situation, Problems and Prospects”. Trakia Journal of Sciences. 18 (Suppl.1): 346–349. doi:10.15547/tjs.2020.s.01.058. S2CID 244351877.
185. ^ Capone, Roberto (2016). “Relations Between Food and Nutrition Security, Diets and Food Systems”. Agriculture and Forestry. 62: 49–58. doi:10.17707/AgricultForest.62.1.05.
186. ^ “Relocating farmland could turn back clock twenty years on carbon emissions, say scientists”. University of Cambridge. Retrieved 18 April 2022.
187. ^ Beyer, Robert M.; Hua, Fangyuan; Martin, Philip A.; Manica, Andrea; Rademacher, Tim (10 March 2022). “Relocating croplands could drastically reduce the environmental impacts of global food production”. Communications Earth & Environment. 3 (1): 49. Bibcode:2022ComEE…3…49B. doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00360-6. hdl:10810/61603. ISSN 2662-4435. S2CID 247322845.
188. ^ Lindgren, Elisabet; Harris, Francesca; Dangour, Alan D.; Gasparatos, Alexandros; Hiramatsu, Michikazu; Javadi, Firouzeh; Loken, Brent; Murakami, Takahiro; Scheelbeek, Pauline; Haines, Andy (1 November 2018). “Sustainable food systems—a health perspective”. Sustainability Science. 13 (6): 1505–1517. Bibcode:2018SuSc…13.1505L. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0586-x. ISSN 1862-4057. PMC 6267166. PMID 30546484.
189. ^ Wynes, Seth; Nicholas, Kimberly A; Zhao, Jiaying; Donner, Simon D (1 November 2018). “Measuring what works: quantifying greenhouse gas emission reductions of behavioural interventions to reduce driving, meat consumption, and household energy use”. Environmental Research Letters. 13 (11): 113002. Bibcode:2018ERL….13k3002W. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae5d7. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 115133659.
190. ^ “Food, Agriculture, and Land Use @ProjectDrawdown”. Project Drawdown. 5 February 2020. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
191. ^ Kummu, M.; Guillaume, J. H. A.; de Moel, H.; Eisner, S.; Flörke, M.; Porkka, M.; Siebert, S.; Veldkamp, T. I. E.; Ward, P. J. (2016). “The world’s road to water scarcity: shortage and stress in the 20th century and pathways towards sustainability”. Scientific Reports. 6 (1): 38495. Bibcode:2016NatSR…638495K. doi:10.1038/srep38495. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5146931. PMID 27934888.
192. ^ Jennings, Paul A. (February 2008). “Dealing with Climate Change at the Local Level” (PDF). Chemical Engineering Progress. 104 (2). American Institute of Chemical Engineers: 40–44. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 December 2008. Retrieved 29 February 2008.
193. ^ Falkenmark, Malin; Rockstrom, Johan; Rockström, Johan (2004). Balancing Water for Humans and Nature: The New Approach in Ecohydrology. Earthscan. pp. 67–68. ISBN 978-1-85383-926-9.
194. ^ Berthouly-Salazar, Cécile; Vigouroux, Yves; Billot, Claire; Scarcelli, Nora; Jankowski, Frédérique; Kane, Ndjido Ardo; Barnaud, Adeline; Burgarella, Concetta (2019). “Adaptive Introgression: An Untapped Evolutionary Mechanism for Crop Adaptation”. Frontiers in Plant Science. 10: 4. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00004. ISSN 1664-462X. PMC 6367218. PMID 30774638.
195. ^ “Diverse water sources key to food security: report”. Reuters. 2010-09-06. Retrieved 2023-02-08.
196. ^ “Adapting to climate change to sustain food security”. International Livestock Research Institute. 16 November 2020.
197. ^ “Food wastage footprint & Climate Change” (PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization.
198. ^ “Food wastage footprint, impacts on natural resources” (PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization.
199. ^ Schanes, Karin; Dobernig, Karin; Gözet, Burcu (2018-05-01). “Food waste matters – A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 182: 978–991. Bibcode:2018JCPro.182..978S. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.030. ISSN 0959-6526. S2CID 158803430.
200. ^ Messner, Rudolf; Johnson, Hope; Richards, Carol (2021-01-01). “From surplus-to-waste: A study of systemic overproduction, surplus and food waste in horticultural supply chains”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 278: 123952. Bibcode:2021JCPro.27823952M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123952. ISSN 0959-6526. S2CID 224961868.
201. ^ Bond, M.; Meacham, T.; Bhunnoo, R.; Benton, TG. (2013). Food Waste Within Global Food Systems.
202. ^ “Fight climate change by preventing food waste”. World Wildlife Fund. Retrieved 2021-03-30.
203. ^ Tonini, Davide; Albizzati, Paola Federica; Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard (2018-06-01). “Environmental impacts of food waste: Learnings and challenges from a case study on UK”. Waste Management. 76: 744–766. Bibcode:2018WaMan..76..744T. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.032. ISSN 0956-053X. PMID 29606533. S2CID 4555820.
204. ^ von Massow, Michael; Parizeau, Kate; Gallant, Monica; Wickson, Mark; Haines, Jess; Ma, David W. L.; Wallace, Angela; Carroll, Nicholas; Duncan, Alison M. (2019). “Valuing the Multiple Impacts of Household Food Waste”. Frontiers in Nutrition. 6: 143. doi:10.3389/fnut.2019.00143. ISSN 2296-861X. PMC 6738328. PMID 31552260.
205. ^ “Sustainable Food Systems”. Masters of the Environment. 2018-08-10. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
206. ^ rebecca (2019-05-23). “Sustainable Food Systems Certificate”. Harvard Extension School. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
207. ^ “Sustainable Food Systems | University of Delaware”. www.udel.edu. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
208. ^ “Sustainable Food Systems | Nutrition & Dietetics | Mesa Community College”. www.mesacc.edu. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
209. ^ “Breakthrough Leaders for Sustainable Food Systems – University Of Vermont Continuing & Distance Education”. learn.uvm.edu. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
210. ^ “Food Systems”. www.uvm.edu. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
211. ^ “Sustainable Food Systems Degree Vermont | Sustainable Food Systems”. Sterling College. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
212. ^ “Graduate Certificate in Sustainable Food Systems – Sustainable Food Systems Initiative”. 6 August 2014. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
213. ^ “Portland State Graduate Certificate in Sustainable Food Systems | Welcome”. www.pdx.edu. Retrieved 2020-02-07.
214. ^ “Portland State College of Urban & Public Affairs: Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies & Planning | Food Systems Advising Pathway”. www.pdx.edu. Retrieved 2020-02-07.
215. ^ “Postgraduate courses | Institute for Sustainable Food | The University of Sheffield”. www.sheffield.ac.uk. Retrieved 2020-04-14.
216. ^ “Grad Certificate | UGA Sustainable Food Systems Initiative”. site.extension.uga.edu. Retrieved 2021-01-11.
217. ^ “CIA Online Master’s in Sustainable Food Systems”. masters.culinary.edu. Retrieved 2022-02-10.
218. ^ “Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems”. The University of Edinburgh. Retrieved 2022-07-29.
219. ^ “The war in Ukraine is exposing gaps in the world’s food-systems research”. Nature. 604 (7905): 217–218. 12 April 2022. Bibcode:2022Natur.604..217.. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00994-8. PMID 35414667. S2CID 248129049.
220. ^ SAPEA (2020). A sustainable food system for the European Union: A systematic review of the European policy ecosystem (PDF). Berlin: Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. doi:10.26356/sustainablefoodreview. ISBN 978-3-9820301-7-3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-06-08. Retrieved 2020-04-14.
221. ^ Group of Chief Scientific Advisors (25 September 2019). “Scoping paper: Towards an EU Sustainable Food System” (PDF). EU Scientific Advice Mechanism.
222. ^ Binns, John (2019-12-10). “Farm to Fork strategy for sustainable food”. Food Safety – European Commission. Retrieved 2020-04-14.
223. ^ “Communication: A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system | European Commission”. commission.europa.eu. Retrieved 2023-04-27.
224. ^ “The shift to a more sustainable food system is inevitable. Here’s how to make it happen | SAPEA”. www.sapea.info. Retrieved 2020-04-14.
225. ^ “Towards sustainable food consumption – SAPEA”. Retrieved 2023-06-29.
226. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Achieving food security in the face of climate change: Summary for policymakers from the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change” (PDF). CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). November 2011.
227. ^ Rosane, Olivia (8 November 2021). “45 Countries Pledge Over $4 Billion to Support Sustainable Agriculture, But Is It Enough?”. Ecowatch. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
228. ^ Surveillance of the impact of COP26 on COVID-19 infections in Scotland – Preliminary report 16 November 2021. 2021-11-16. doi:10.52487/49704. S2CID 247960201.
229. ^ Pacini, Andrea; Rossini, Stefano (2021-12-09). “Tackling the Methane Quandary: Curbing Emissions from Control Valves”. Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021. SPE. doi:10.2118/207337-MS.
230. ^ Geiges, Andreas; Fyson, Claire; Hans, Frederic; Jeffery, Louise; Mooldijk, Silke; Gidden, Matthew; Ramapope, Deborah; Hare, Bill; Stockwell, Claire (2021-03-04). “Implications of current net zero targets for long-term emissions pathways and warming levels”. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Bibcode:2021EGUGA..2311018G. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11018. S2CID 237960433.
231. ^ Surveillance of the impact of COP26 on COVID-19 infections in Scotland – Preliminary report 16 November 2021. 2021-11-16. doi:10.52487/49704. S2CID 247960201.
232. ^ Matthew, Bossons. “New Meat: Is China Ready for a Plant-Based Future?”. That’s. Retrieved 21 June 2020.
233. ^ Milman, Oliver; Leavenworth, Stuart (20 June 2016). “China’s plan to cut meat consumption by 50% cheered by climate campaigners”. The Guardian. Retrieved 21 June 2020.
234. ^ Jiao, Xiao-qiang; Zhang, Hong-yan; Ma, Wen-qi; Wang, Chong; Li, Xiao-lin; Zhang, Fu-suo (2019). “Science and Technology Backyard: A novel approach to empower smallholder farmers for sustainable intensification of agriculture in China”. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 18 (8): 1657–1666. Bibcode:2019JIAgr..18.1657J. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62592-X. ISSN 2095-3119.
235. ^ “Sustainable Agriculture in India 2021”. CEEW. 2021-04-16. Retrieved 2022-06-09.
236. ^ “Delhi-based SowGood Foundation fosters a green thumb”. The New Indian Express. 17 October 2021. Retrieved 2022-06-09.