Sustainable Technology of 2180

Sustainable Technology of 2180 ?

Predicting sustainable technology in 2180 is a bit like gazing into a crystal ball, but based on current trends and emerging ideas, here are some potential advancements:

• Advanced Energy Harvesting & Storage:
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Harnessing solar energy in space and beaming it down to Earth could become more efficient and cost-effective.
  • Room-Temperature Superconductors: Enabling lossless energy transmission and more powerful, compact devices.
  • Nuclear Fusion: If successful, fusion power could provide a virtually limitless, clean energy source.  
• Resource Recycling & Circular Economy:
  • Molecular Recycling: Breaking down and reassembling materials at the molecular level, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.  
  • 3D Printing with Biodegradable Materials: Creating products on-demand using sustainable materials, reducing transportation and waste.
  • Closed-Loop Systems: Designing products and processes to keep materials within a continuous cycle, eliminating waste entirely.  
• Advanced Agriculture & Food Production:
  • Vertical Farming: Growing crops in stacked layers, maximizing land use and reducing environmental impact.  
  • Lab-Grown Meat & Plant-Based Alternatives: Reducing reliance on animal agriculture, a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.  
  • Precision Agriculture: Using data and technology to optimize crop yields and minimize resource use.  
• AI-Powered Sustainability Solutions:
  • Predictive Maintenance: Using AI to anticipate and prevent equipment failures, reducing waste and energy consumption.  
  • Smart Grids: Optimizing energy distribution and consumption in real-time, improving efficiency and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.  
  • AI-Driven Conservation Efforts: Using AI to monitor and protect endangered species and ecosystems.  
• Space-Based Technologies:
  • Space-Based Manufacturing: Reducing the environmental impact of manufacturing by conducting it in space.
  • Asteroid Mining: Accessing valuable resources beyond Earth, reducing the strain on terrestrial resources.  
  • Space-Based Pollution Control: Developing technologies to mitigate space debris and other forms of space pollution.

It’s important to remember that these are just a few potential examples, and the future of sustainable technology will likely be shaped by unforeseen breakthroughs and societal shifts. The key will be to prioritize innovation that addresses our most pressing environmental challenges while ensuring equity and accessibility for all.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2180 ?

Predicting the exact state of sustainable technology in 2180 is impossible, but based on current trends and emerging ideas, we can envision some potential advancements:

• Energy Revolution:
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in space beaming energy to Earth, overcoming limitations of weather and day/night cycles.  
  • Room-Temperature Superconductivity: Enabling lossless energy transmission and ultra-efficient energy storage.  
  • Advanced Nuclear Fusion: Clean and abundant energy source, likely powering most of humanity’s needs.
• Resource Revolution:
  • Molecular Recycling: Breaking down and reassembling materials at the molecular level, eliminating waste and maximizing resource utilization.  
  • 3D Printing with Biodegradable Materials: On-demand manufacturing of goods using sustainable, locally sourced materials.
  • Closed-Loop Systems: Designing products and processes to keep materials within a continuous cycle, minimizing waste and environmental impact.  
• Food & Agriculture:
  • Vertical Farming: Growing crops in multi-layered structures, maximizing land use and reducing environmental impact.  
  • Lab-Grown Meat & Plant-Based Alternatives: Reducing reliance on animal agriculture, a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.  
  • Precision Agriculture: Using AI and data to optimize crop yields, minimize resource use, and combat climate change.  
• AI-Powered Sustainability:
  • Predictive Maintenance: AI anticipating and preventing equipment failures, reducing waste and energy consumption.  
  • Smart Cities: Optimizing energy, transportation, and resource management in urban areas.  
  • AI-Driven Conservation: Using AI to monitor and protect ecosystems, combat pollution, and mitigate climate change.  
• Space Exploration & Sustainability:
  • Space-Based Manufacturing: Reducing the environmental impact of manufacturing by conducting it in space.
  • Asteroid Mining: Accessing valuable resources beyond Earth, reducing the strain on terrestrial resources.
  • Space-Based Pollution Control: Developing technologies to mitigate space debris and other forms of space pollution.

Key Considerations:

• Ethical Development: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and minimizing their potential negative impacts.
• Social and Economic Factors: Integrating sustainability into all aspects of society, including economic systems and social structures.
• Unforeseen Breakthroughs: The future of technology is inherently unpredictable.

Disclaimer: This is a speculative vision of the future. Actual advancements will depend on various factors, including scientific progress, societal choices, and unforeseen events.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2180 ?

Sustainable technology in 2180 will be required by:

• Humanity as a whole:
  • To mitigate and adapt to climate change.
  • To ensure the long-term health and sustainability of the planet.
  • To provide for a growing global population with limited resources.
• Governments:
  • To meet environmental regulations and sustainability goals.
  • To improve public health and well-being.
  • To foster economic growth and competitiveness.
• Businesses:
  • To reduce environmental impact and operational costs.
  • To meet consumer demand for sustainable products and services.
  • To enhance their brand image and reputation.
• Individuals:
  • To reduce their environmental footprint.
  • To improve their quality of life.
  • To contribute to a more sustainable future.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 2180 will be crucial for the survival and well-being of all living beings on Earth. It will be a fundamental aspect of every aspect of human society, from energy production and food systems to transportation and communication.

Disclaimer: This is a speculative vision of the future. Actual advancements will depend on various factors, including scientific progress, societal choices, and unforeseen events.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2180 ?

Sustainable technology in 2180 will be urgently required.

Here’s why:

• Climate Change: The effects of climate change will likely be significantly more pronounced by 2180. Extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and resource scarcity will demand innovative solutions.
• Resource Depletion: Continued reliance on non-renewable resources will lead to severe shortages and environmental degradation.
• Population Growth: A significantly larger global population will place immense pressure on resources and ecosystems.
• Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and biodiversity loss will continue to threaten the planet’s health.

Therefore, developing and implementing sustainable technologies will be crucial for:

• Mitigating climate change: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and developing carbon capture technologies.  
• Ensuring resource security: Developing renewable energy sources, improving resource efficiency, and implementing circular economy principles.
• Protecting biodiversity: Developing technologies to restore ecosystems and protect endangered species.  
• Adapting to climate change: Developing resilient infrastructure and implementing strategies to cope with the impacts of climate change.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 2180 will not be a luxury, but a necessity for the survival and well-being of humanity and the planet.

Disclaimer: This is a speculative vision of the future. Actual advancements will depend on various factors, including scientific progress, societal choices, and unforeseen events.

COURTESY :
Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2180 ?

Sustainable technology in 2180 will be required everywhere.

Here’s why:

• Global Impact: Climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation are global challenges that require global solutions.
• Interconnected World: Our world is increasingly interconnected. Issues in one region can have significant impacts on others.  
• Environmental Justice: Ensuring equitable access to clean water, air, and a healthy environment is a global responsibility.

Specific examples include:

• Developing nations: May require sustainable technologies to leapfrog traditional development paths and avoid the environmental pitfalls of the industrial revolution.  
• Developed nations: Will need to transition to a more sustainable model to reduce their environmental footprint and support developing nations.
• Remote and vulnerable communities: Will rely on sustainable technologies for resilience in the face of climate change impacts.
• Ocean environments: Sustainable technologies will be crucial for mitigating ocean pollution, protecting marine biodiversity, and addressing the impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems.  

Essentially, sustainable technology will be required across the globe to ensure a healthy and prosperous future for all.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2180 ?

Sustainable technology in 2180 will be required through a multifaceted approach:

• Research & Development:
  • Continued investment in research and development of cutting-edge sustainable technologies.  
  • Fostering interdisciplinary collaboration between scientists, engineers, and social scientists.  
  • Prioritizing open-source innovation and knowledge sharing.
• Policy & Regulation:
  • Implementing strong environmental regulations and incentives for sustainable technologies.
  • Investing in infrastructure to support the transition to a sustainable economy.
  • Promoting international cooperation and collaboration on sustainability goals.
• Education & Awareness:
  • Integrating sustainability education into all levels of education.
  • Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainable technologies.
  • Fostering a culture of environmental responsibility and stewardship.
• Market Forces:
  • Creating consumer demand for sustainable products and services.  
  • Supporting businesses that prioritize sustainability.
  • Investing in sustainable businesses and technologies.
• Community Engagement:
  • Empowering local communities to develop and implement sustainable solutions.  
  • Fostering community-based initiatives and citizen science projects.

Essentially, a multi-pronged approach involving government, industry, academia, and the public will be crucial to driving the widespread adoption and utilization of sustainable technologies in 2180.

Disclaimer: This is a speculative vision of the future. Actual advancements will depend on various factors, including scientific progress, societal choices, and unforeseen events.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2180 ?

Case Study: The Rise of the “Symbiotic City” – 2180

Setting: 2180. The global population has surpassed 11 billion, and the effects of climate change are undeniable. Coastal cities are grappling with rising sea levels, while inland regions face severe droughts and unpredictable weather patterns.

The Challenge: How can a densely populated urban center thrive in a rapidly changing environment while minimizing its ecological footprint?

The Solution: The “Symbiotic City” emerges as a leading model for sustainable urban living. This visionary metropolis is a testament to the power of integrated, bio-inspired design and cutting-edge technology.

Key Features:

1. Vertical Farming & Food Production: Skyscrapers are transformed into vertical farms, cultivating a diverse range of crops year-round using hydroponics and aeroponics. This minimizes reliance on long-distance transportation and reduces the city’s ecological footprint.  
2. Closed-Loop Resource Management: Waste is virtually eliminated. Organic waste is composted and used as fertilizer for the vertical farms. Wastewater is treated and recycled for irrigation and industrial use.
3. Renewable Energy Grid: The city is powered by a diverse portfolio of renewable energy sources, including:
   • Space-Based Solar Power: Gigawatt-scale solar arrays in orbit beam clean energy down to Earth, ensuring a constant supply.
   • Geothermal Energy: Deep geothermal wells tap into the Earth’s internal heat for heating and cooling.  
   • Tidal and Wave Energy: Coastal installations harness the power of the ocean tides and waves.  
4. Smart Infrastructure: AI-powered systems optimize energy consumption, traffic flow, and resource allocation in real-time.
5. Biodiverse Green Spaces: Integrated green spaces, including rooftop gardens, urban forests, and green walls, provide habitat for wildlife, improve air quality, and mitigate the urban heat island effect.
6. Community-Driven Innovation: Citizens are actively involved in the city’s sustainability efforts, participating in community gardens, sharing resources, and developing innovative solutions to local challenges.

Impact:

• Improved Quality of Life: Residents enjoy access to fresh, locally grown food, clean air and water, and a vibrant, livable environment.
• Reduced Environmental Impact: The city achieves carbon neutrality and minimizes its ecological footprint.
• Enhanced Resilience: The city is better equipped to withstand the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events and resource scarcity.

Challenges:

• Initial Investment: The transition to a Symbiotic City requires significant upfront investment in infrastructure and technology.
• Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to resources and benefits for all residents is crucial.
• Technological Advancements: Continued research and development are needed to advance sustainable technologies and address emerging challenges.

Conclusion:

The Symbiotic City serves as a powerful example of how human ingenuity and technological innovation can create a sustainable and equitable future for urban populations. By embracing a holistic approach to urban planning and design, cities can become engines of environmental regeneration and human well-being.

Note: This is a fictional case study. However, it draws inspiration from current trends and emerging technologies, offering a glimpse into the potential of sustainable urban living in the future.

This case study can be further explored by:

• Analyzing the social, economic, and environmental impacts of the Symbiotic City.
• Developing a detailed plan for the implementation of key technologies and infrastructure.
• Investigating the potential challenges and risks associated with this model.
• Considering the ethical implications of such a technologically advanced society.

I hope this case study provides a thought-provoking framework for discussing the future of sustainable technology and urban living.Sources and related content

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2180 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2180: A Vision for a Thriving Future

1. Introduction

By 2180, humanity will face unprecedented challenges: a burgeoning global population, the intensifying impacts of climate change, and the depletion of natural resources. The survival and well-being of future generations will depend on the development and widespread adoption of sustainable technologies. This white paper explores potential advancements and their critical role in shaping a sustainable future.

2. Key Technological Pillars

• Energy Revolution:
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in space beaming clean energy to Earth, overcoming limitations of weather and day/night cycles.
  • Advanced Nuclear Fusion: Clean and abundant energy source, powering a majority of global energy needs.
  • Room-Temperature Superconductivity: Enabling lossless energy transmission and ultra-efficient energy storage.
• Resource Revolution:
  • Molecular Recycling: Breaking down and reassembling materials at the molecular level, eliminating waste and maximizing resource utilization.
  • 3D Printing with Biodegradable Materials: On-demand manufacturing of goods using sustainable, locally sourced materials.
  • Closed-Loop Systems: Designing products and processes to keep materials within a continuous cycle, minimizing waste and environmental impact.
• Food & Agriculture:
  • Vertical Farming: Growing crops in multi-layered structures, maximizing land use and reducing environmental impact.
  • Lab-Grown Meat & Plant-Based Alternatives: Reducing reliance on animal agriculture, a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Precision Agriculture: Using AI and data to optimize crop yields, minimize resource use, and combat climate change.
• AI-Powered Sustainability:
  • Predictive Maintenance: AI anticipating and preventing equipment failures, reducing waste and energy consumption.
  • Smart Cities: Optimizing energy, transportation, and resource management in urban areas.
  • AI-Driven Conservation: Using AI to monitor and protect ecosystems, combat pollution, and mitigate climate change.
• Space Exploration & Sustainability:
  • Space-Based Manufacturing: Reducing the environmental impact of manufacturing by conducting it in space.
  • Asteroid Mining: Accessing valuable resources beyond Earth, reducing the strain on terrestrial resources.
  • Space-Based Pollution Control: Developing technologies to mitigate space debris and other forms of space pollution.

3. Challenges and Considerations

• Ethical Development: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and minimizing their potential negative impacts.
• Social and Economic Factors: Integrating sustainability into all aspects of society, including economic systems and social structures.
• Unforeseen Breakthroughs: The future of technology is inherently unpredictable.

4. Recommendations

• Invest in Research & Development: Prioritize research and development of cutting-edge sustainable technologies.
• Foster Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Encourage collaboration between scientists, engineers, and social scientists.
• Implement Strong Policies: Enact policies that incentivize sustainable technologies and discourage environmentally harmful practices.
• Promote Education & Awareness: Integrate sustainability education into all levels of education and raise public awareness.
• Embrace Market Forces: Create consumer demand for sustainable products and services.
• Foster Community Engagement: Empower local communities to develop and implement sustainable solutions.

5. Conclusion

Sustainable technology will be crucial for addressing the pressing challenges of the 21st century. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and implementing effective policies, humanity can create a more sustainable and equitable future for all.

Disclaimer: This white paper presents a speculative vision of the future. Actual advancements will depend on various factors, including scientific progress, societal choices, and unforeseen events.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2180 ?

Industrial Applications of Sustainable Technology in 2180: A Vision

By 2180, sustainable technology will be deeply integrated into every facet of industrial operations. Here are some key applications:

1. Energy Production & Consumption:

• Decentralized Energy Grids: Powered by a mix of renewable sources (solar, wind, geothermal, tidal) and advanced nuclear fusion, these grids will be highly efficient and resilient.
• Industrial Symbiosis: Industries will collaborate, sharing resources and waste streams. For example, a steel mill might provide excess heat to a nearby greenhouse, creating a mutually beneficial system.  
• Energy-Efficient Manufacturing: Industries will utilize advanced robotics and AI to optimize production processes, minimizing energy consumption and waste.  

2. Resource Management & Circular Economy:

• Molecular Recycling: Industries will employ technologies to break down and reassemble materials at the molecular level, enabling near-perfect recycling of plastics, metals, and other valuable resources.
• 3D Printing & Additive Manufacturing: On-demand manufacturing will minimize waste and transportation by producing goods locally, using recycled or bio-based materials.  
• Industrial Biotechnology: Utilizing biological processes to produce chemicals, materials, and fuels, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing environmental impact.  

3. Advanced Manufacturing & Robotics:

• AI-Powered Robotics: Highly sophisticated robots will automate complex tasks, improving efficiency, safety, and precision while reducing human labor in hazardous environments.
• Nanotechnology: Revolutionizing materials science with applications in advanced manufacturing, creating stronger, lighter, and more durable materials with enhanced properties.  
• Biomimicry: Industrial processes will be inspired by nature, mimicking natural systems for efficiency, resilience, and sustainability.

4. Environmental Remediation:

• Carbon Capture & Sequestration: Technologies will capture carbon emissions from industrial processes and store them safely underground or utilize them for other purposes.  
• Pollution Prevention & Control: Advanced sensors and AI will monitor and control pollution in real-time, minimizing environmental impact.
• Ecological Restoration: Technologies will be employed to restore damaged ecosystems and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

5. Space-Based Industries:

• Space-Based Manufacturing: Conducting certain industrial processes in space can offer significant advantages, such as microgravity environments and access to unique resources.  
• Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in space can provide a constant source of clean energy for industrial operations on Earth.

Key Considerations:

• Ethical Implications: Ensuring equitable access to technology and minimizing potential negative impacts on workers and communities.
• Social and Economic Impacts: Ensuring that the transition to sustainable industrial practices creates new jobs and economic opportunities.
• Continuous Innovation: Ongoing research and development will be crucial to address emerging challenges and develop even more advanced sustainable technologies.

Conclusion:

In 2180, sustainable technology will be the cornerstone of industrial operations. By embracing innovation, prioritizing resource efficiency, and minimizing environmental impact, industries can thrive while contributing to a healthy planet for future generations.

Disclaimer: This is a speculative vision of the future. Actual advancements will depend on various factors, including scientific progress, societal choices, and unforeseen events.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2180 ?

Research & Development of Sustainable Technology in 2180: A Vision

By 2180, the landscape of research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology will be dramatically different. Here’s a glimpse into the potential:

1. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

• Convergence of Disciplines: R&D will transcend traditional boundaries, fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, artists, and even philosophers.
• Citizen Science: Active citizen participation in research will be commonplace, with individuals contributing data, insights, and local knowledge.

2. Advanced Research Methodologies:

• AI-Powered Research: AI will play a crucial role in accelerating research, analyzing vast datasets, identifying promising research directions, and designing experiments.
• Biomimicry & Bio-inspired Design: Nature will serve as a primary source of inspiration, with researchers studying natural systems to develop more efficient and sustainable technologies.
• Synthetic Biology: Advances in genetic engineering and synthetic biology will enable the creation of novel materials, biofuels, and medicines.  

3. Focus on Societal Impact:

• Human-Centered Design: R&D will prioritize the needs and well-being of people, ensuring that new technologies are equitable, accessible, and socially just.
• Life Cycle Assessment: Emphasis will be placed on understanding the full environmental and social impacts of technologies throughout their entire lifecycle.
• Open Innovation & Knowledge Sharing: Open-source research and collaborative platforms will facilitate the rapid dissemination and sharing of knowledge.  

4. Ethical Considerations:

• Ethical Guidelines: Robust ethical frameworks will guide research and development, ensuring responsible innovation and minimizing potential risks.
• Environmental Justice: Research will prioritize solutions that address environmental and social inequities, ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technologies are shared equitably.
• Long-Term Sustainability: R&D will focus on long-term sustainability, considering the potential impacts of technologies on future generations and the planet’s health.

5. Global Collaboration:

• International Partnerships: Global collaborations will be essential for tackling complex challenges, such as climate change and resource depletion.  
• Knowledge Sharing Platforms: International platforms will facilitate the exchange of knowledge and best practices among researchers and innovators worldwide.

Conclusion:

In 2180, R&D for sustainable technology will be a global, interdisciplinary, and human-centered endeavor. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, humanity can create a more sustainable and equitable future for all.

Disclaimer: This is a speculative vision of the future. Actual advancements will depend on various factors, including scientific progress, societal choices, and unforeseen events.Sources and related content

Reference

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.