Sustainable Technology of 2140

81 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 2140 ?

Predicting the exact state of technology 120 years in the future is inherently challenging, but we can extrapolate from current trends and emerging research to envision some possibilities for sustainable technology in 2140:

Energy:

Fusion Power: Nuclear fusion, with its potential for abundant, clean energy, might be a commercial reality, powering cities and industries with minimal waste.
Advanced Solar: Solar technology could be vastly improved with higher efficiency, new materials (like perovskites), and innovative deployment methods (space-based solar, integrated solar surfaces).
Energy Storage Breakthroughs: Advanced battery technologies (solid-state, lithium-air, or entirely new chemistries) and other storage solutions (e.g., pumped hydro with advanced materials, thermal storage) will be crucial for balancing renewable energy supply and demand.
Smart Grids: Highly intelligent, decentralized grids that optimize energy distribution, predict demand, and integrate diverse energy sources will be essential.

Materials and Manufacturing:

Biomimicry and Biofabrication: Manufacturing processes inspired by nature, using biological systems to grow materials or create products, could lead to self-healing, biodegradable, and highly efficient materials.
Circular Economy: A fully realized circular economy where products are designed for disassembly and reuse, with near-zero waste and closed-loop material flows.
Carbon Capture and Utilization: Technologies to capture CO2 from the atmosphere and industrial sources, transforming it into valuable products (fuels, building materials, chemicals), could be widespread.
Advanced Recycling: Highly efficient recycling processes that can extract valuable materials from complex waste streams, reducing the need for virgin resources.

Environment and Resources:

Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors, AI, and robotics could enable highly efficient agriculture with minimal water and fertilizer use, optimized for local conditions.
Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Large-scale efforts to remove plastic and other pollutants from the oceans, combined with technologies to restore marine ecosystems.
Water Management: Advanced desalination, water recycling, and efficient irrigation technologies to address water scarcity in many regions.
Climate Engineering: While controversial, technologies to actively manage the climate (e.g., carbon dioxide removal, solar radiation management) might be deployed as a last resort to mitigate climate change impacts.

Other potential developments:

Artificial Intelligence: AI will play a crucial role in optimizing energy use, managing resources, designing sustainable systems, and accelerating scientific discovery in related fields.
Nanotechnology: Nanomaterials with unique properties could enable more efficient solar cells, better batteries, advanced filters for water purification, and many other applications.
Biotechnology: Genetically engineered organisms could be used for bioremediation, biofuel production, and other sustainable solutions.

It’s important to remember that these are just some possibilities. The actual path of technological development will depend on many factors, including scientific breakthroughs, economic conditions, social priorities, and policy decisions. However, it’s clear that sustainable technology will be a critical area of focus in the coming decades, as we strive to create a more environmentally responsible and equitable future.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2140 ?

Sustainable technology in 2140 refers to the advanced tools, systems, and methods that will enable human society to thrive while minimizing environmental impact and preserving resources for future generations. It will likely be characterized by:

Closed-loop systems: Mimicking natural ecosystems, where waste is minimized and resources are constantly reused and recycled.
Renewable energy dominance: Reliance on abundant, clean energy sources like solar, wind, and potentially fusion power.
Advanced materials: Utilizing bio-based, biodegradable, and highly recyclable materials with minimal environmental footprint.
Smart and efficient systems: Employing AI and other technologies to optimize resource use, reduce waste, and minimize pollution.
Restorative technologies: Actively working to repair past environmental damage and restore ecosystems.

Some specific examples of sustainable technology in 2140 could include:

Fusion power plants: Providing clean and abundant energy for cities and industries.
Space-based solar farms: Capturing solar energy in space and beaming it to Earth.
Bio-factories: Using engineered organisms to produce fuels, materials, and other products sustainably.
Advanced recycling systems: Recovering valuable materials from even the most complex waste streams.
Precision agriculture: Optimizing food production with minimal water, fertilizer, and land use.
Ocean cleanup and restoration technologies: Removing plastic and other pollutants from the oceans and restoring marine ecosystems.

These are just a few possibilities, and the actual technologies of 2140 may be even more advanced and innovative. However, the underlying principle will remain the same: to create a sustainable future for humanity and the planet.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2140 ?

Sustainable technology in 2140 won’t be a luxury or an option; it will be a necessity for the survival and well-being of:

Humanity: To ensure access to clean air, water, food, and energy, and to mitigate the impacts of climate change and environmental degradation.
All living beings: To protect biodiversity, preserve ecosystems, and prevent further extinction of species.
Future generations: To leave behind a healthy planet with sufficient resources and opportunities for them to thrive.

Essentially, everyone will require sustainable technology in 2140. It will be deeply integrated into all aspects of life, from how we generate and use energy to how we produce and consume goods, manage resources, and interact with the environment.

Think of it this way:

Individuals: Will rely on sustainable technologies for their homes, transportation, food, and daily needs.
Communities: Will depend on sustainable infrastructure, energy systems, and resource management practices.
Businesses: Will need to adopt sustainable production methods, supply chains, and business models.
Governments: Will be responsible for implementing policies and regulations that promote sustainable development and the adoption of sustainable technologies.

In short, sustainable technology in 2140 will be essential for creating a just, equitable, and resilient future for all.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2140 ?

While the most advanced forms of sustainable technology might be envisioned for 2140, the need for sustainable solutions is urgent and ongoing. We need to be developing and implementing sustainable technologies now and continuously improving them over the next 120 years.

Here’s why:

Climate change: The effects of climate change are already being felt around the world, with rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and disruptions to ecosystems. We need to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to the changing climate as soon as possible.
Resource depletion: Many of the Earth’s resources are finite, and we are consuming them at an unsustainable rate. We need to find ways to use resources more efficiently, recycle materials, and develop alternative resources.
Environmental degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and other forms of environmental degradation are harming ecosystems and human health. We need to protect and restore ecosystems and minimize our environmental impact.

Therefore, while the most sophisticated sustainable technologies might be required by 2140 to maintain a thriving civilization, the need for sustainable solutions is immediate. Every step we take today towards developing and implementing sustainable technologies will help us create a better future.

In essence, the answer to “when is sustainable technology of 2140 required?” is:

In its most advanced forms: By 2140, to meet the challenges of a potentially very different world.
In its core principles and developing forms: Starting now, and continuously improving and adapting over the next 120 years.

COURTESY : Rise and Shine

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2140 ?

Sustainable technology of 2140 will be required everywhere on Earth, and potentially even beyond! Here’s a breakdown of the key areas:

Urban centers: Cities will need advanced sustainable technologies for energy generation and distribution, waste management, transportation, and building design to accommodate growing populations while minimizing their environmental footprint.
Rural areas: Sustainable agriculture, water management, and decentralized energy solutions will be crucial for maintaining food security and supporting rural communities.
Industrial zones: Industries will need to adopt closed-loop production systems, utilize renewable energy sources, and minimize pollution to reduce their environmental impact.
Natural environments: Sustainable technologies will be needed to protect and restore ecosystems, manage natural resources, and mitigate the impacts of climate change.
Oceans: Technologies for cleaning up pollution, restoring marine ecosystems, and sustainably harvesting resources will be essential for maintaining ocean health.
Space: As humanity potentially expands its presence in space, sustainable technologies for resource utilization, waste management, and life support will be necessary for long-term space exploration and colonization.

Essentially, sustainable technology of 2140 will be required wherever human activity takes place and wherever there is a need to protect and preserve the environment. It will be a global imperative, requiring international cooperation and collaboration to develop and implement these technologies effectively.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2140 ?

Sustainable technology of 2140 will be required in a multifaceted way, involving a deep integration of various approaches and principles:

1. Systemic Integration:

Interconnected Systems: It won’t be about isolated solutions but rather interconnected systems that work together seamlessly. For example, energy systems will be integrated with transportation, buildings, and industry, optimizing energy use across all sectors.
Circular Economy Principles: Products will be designed for disassembly and reuse, with closed-loop material flows and minimal waste. This will require a shift from linear “take-make-dispose” models to circular ones.

2. Technological Advancements:

Advanced Materials: Biomimicry and biofabrication will likely lead to self-healing, biodegradable, and highly efficient materials. Nanotechnology could provide solutions for more efficient solar cells, better batteries, and advanced filters for water purification.
Renewable Energy Dominance: Fusion power, advanced solar technologies, and innovative energy storage solutions will be crucial for a sustainable energy future.
AI and Automation: AI will play a vital role in optimizing energy use, managing resources, designing sustainable systems, and accelerating scientific discovery in related fields. Automation and robotics will enable more efficient and precise manufacturing and resource management.

3. Societal Shifts:

Behavioral Changes: Sustainable technology will need to be accompanied by changes in human behavior and consumption patterns. This could involve adopting more sustainable lifestyles, reducing consumption, and embracing sharing economies.
Policy and Regulation: Governments will need to implement policies and regulations that promote sustainable development and the adoption of sustainable technologies. This could include carbon pricing, incentives for renewable energy, and regulations on resource use.
Global Collaboration: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require international cooperation and collaboration to develop and implement sustainable technologies effectively.

4. Ethical Considerations:

Equity and Justice: Sustainable technology must be developed and deployed in a way that is equitable and just, ensuring that all people have access to its benefits and that no one is disproportionately burdened by its costs or risks.
Environmental Stewardship: A strong ethical framework will be needed to guide the development and use of sustainable technology, ensuring that it is used to protect and preserve the environment for future generations.

In essence, sustainable technology of 2140 will be required through a combination of technological innovation, systemic integration, societal shifts, and ethical considerations. It will be a holistic approach that addresses the interconnected challenges of sustainability and creates a more resilient and equitable future for all.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2140 ?

It’s tricky to give a concrete “case study” for 2140, as it’s so far in the future. However, we can create a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and predictions, illustrating how various sustainable technologies might interact:

Case Study: The Integrated Sustainable City of “Ecoville” – 2140

Setting: Ecoville is a coastal city built on reclaimed land, designed to be completely self-sufficient and resilient to climate change impacts.

Key Sustainable Technologies in Action:

Energy:
- Fusion Power Plant: A compact fusion reactor provides baseload power for the city, with minimal radioactive waste.
- Space-Based Solar: Supplementing fusion, large orbital solar arrays beam clean energy to the city via microwave transmission.
- Advanced Energy Storage: Excess energy is stored in a network of advanced batteries (solid-state and metal-air), pumped hydro facilities built into the city’s infrastructure, and thermal storage systems.
- Smart Grid: An AI-powered grid manages energy distribution, predicting demand, optimizing energy flow, and seamlessly integrating various energy sources.
Materials and Manufacturing:
- Bio-factories: Using engineered microorganisms, bio-factories produce biodegradable plastics, biofuels, and other materials from organic waste and CO2 captured from the atmosphere.
- 3D Printing with Recycled Materials: Buildings and infrastructure are constructed using 3D printing technology with recycled and bio-based materials, minimizing waste and resource consumption.
- Advanced Recycling Facilities: Highly automated facilities use advanced separation and extraction techniques to recover valuable materials from all waste streams, achieving near-zero waste.
Environment and Resources:
- Vertical Farms and Aquaponics: Food is grown in vertical farms and aquaponic systems within the city, maximizing space utilization and minimizing water and land use.
- Automated Water Management: Smart sensors and AI manage water resources, optimizing irrigation, detecting leaks, and purifying wastewater for reuse.
- Coastal Protection and Restoration: The city is protected by engineered coastal defenses that integrate natural ecosystems like mangrove forests and artificial reefs, providing both protection and habitat for marine life.
Transportation:
- Autonomous Electric Vehicles: The city has a network of autonomous electric vehicles powered by renewable energy, providing efficient and sustainable transportation for residents.
- Hyperloop Network: High-speed hyperloop systems connect Ecoville to other cities, enabling fast and sustainable long-distance travel.

Outcome:

Ecoville is a thriving city with a minimal environmental footprint. It is resilient to climate change impacts, provides a high quality of life for its residents, and serves as a model for sustainable urban development.

Key takeaways from this hypothetical case study:

Integration is key: The success of Ecoville relies on the integration of various sustainable technologies into a cohesive system.
Technological advancements are crucial: Advanced materials, renewable energy technologies, AI, and automation play a vital role in achieving sustainability.
Societal changes are necessary: Sustainable lifestyles, policies, and global collaboration are essential for creating a sustainable future.

While this is a fictional example, it illustrates how sustainable technology in 2140 could be implemented to create a more sustainable and resilient future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2140 ?

It’s impossible to write a definitive “white paper” on sustainable technology in 2140, as it would be largely speculative. However, I can outline the key sections and potential content of such a paper, based on current trends and expert predictions:

Title: Sustainable Technology in 2140: A Vision for a Resilient and Equitable Future

Abstract: This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in 2140, envisioning a future where human society thrives in harmony with the planet. It examines key technological advancements, systemic changes, and societal shifts necessary to achieve a truly sustainable future, addressing challenges related to energy, resources, environment, and social equity.

1. Introduction:

The urgent need for sustainable solutions in the face of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation.
The concept of sustainable technology and its importance for future generations.
The scope and objectives of the white paper.

2. Energy Systems of the Future:

Fusion Power: The potential of fusion energy as a clean, abundant, and safe energy source.
Advanced Solar Technologies: Space-based solar, highly efficient photovoltaics, and innovative deployment methods.
Energy Storage Breakthroughs: Advanced batteries, pumped hydro, thermal storage, and other innovative solutions.
Smart Grids and Energy Management: AI-powered grids, decentralized energy systems, and demand-side management.

3. Materials and Manufacturing:

Biomimicry and Biofabrication: Sustainable materials inspired by nature, grown using biological systems.
Circular Economy and Closed-Loop Systems: Designing products for disassembly, reuse, and recycling.
Carbon Capture and Utilization: Transforming CO2 into valuable products.
Advanced Recycling Technologies: Efficiently recovering materials from complex waste streams.

4. Environment and Resource Management:

Precision Agriculture and Sustainable Food Production: Optimizing food production with minimal environmental impact.
Water Management and Conservation: Advanced desalination, water recycling, and efficient irrigation.
Ecosystem Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation: Technologies for restoring damaged ecosystems and protecting endangered species.
Climate Engineering (if necessary): Exploring potential technologies for mitigating climate change impacts.

5. The Role of Technology in Society:

Artificial Intelligence and Automation: Optimizing resource use, designing sustainable systems, and accelerating scientific discovery.
Nanotechnology and Biotechnology: Enabling new solutions for energy, materials, and environmental management.
Sustainable Urban Development: Designing eco-cities with minimal environmental footprints.
Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, hyperloop systems, and other innovative transportation solutions.

6. Societal Shifts and Policy Implications:

Behavioral Changes and Sustainable Lifestyles: Reducing consumption, embracing sharing economies, and adopting sustainable practices.
Policy and Regulation: Implementing policies that promote sustainable development and the adoption of sustainable technologies.
Global Collaboration and International Agreements: Addressing global challenges through international cooperation.

7. Ethical Considerations:

Equity and Justice: Ensuring that sustainable technology benefits all people and does not exacerbate existing inequalities.
Environmental Stewardship: Protecting and preserving the environment for future generations.
Responsible Innovation: Guiding the development and use of sustainable technology in an ethical and responsible manner.

8. Conclusion:

Reiterating the importance of sustainable technology for a resilient and equitable future.
Highlighting the key challenges and opportunities for achieving this vision.
Calling for continued research, innovation, and collaboration to develop and implement sustainable technologies effectively.

This outline provides a framework for a white paper on sustainable technology in 2140. While some of the specific technologies and solutions may change over time, the underlying principles of sustainability, equity, and resilience will remain crucial for creating a better future for humanity and the planet.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2140 ?

Predicting specific industrial applications in 2140 is difficult, but we can extrapolate current trends to imagine how sustainable technologies might revolutionize various sectors:

1. Manufacturing:

Bio-integrated Production: Imagine factories replaced by “bio-factories” where engineered organisms produce materials, chemicals, and even complex components. This could drastically reduce reliance on fossil fuels and traditional chemical processes.
Additive Manufacturing (4D Printing): Advanced 3D printing, potentially incorporating self-assembling materials or those that react to stimuli (4D printing), could enable on-demand production with minimal waste, tailored to specific needs and with dynamic functionality.
Closed-loop Material Flows: Factories become nodes in a circular economy, with near-total recycling and reuse of materials. AI-powered systems track materials through their lifecycle, optimizing recovery and minimizing waste.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

Fusion-powered Industries: Industries requiring high energy inputs (e.g., steelmaking, aluminum production) could be directly powered by clean and abundant fusion energy, eliminating reliance on fossil fuels.
Decentralized Energy Grids: Industries might operate on localized, microgrids powered by a mix of renewable sources and advanced storage, increasing resilience and reducing transmission losses.
Energy Harvesting and Waste Heat Recovery: Advanced materials and nanotechnology could enable efficient harvesting of ambient energy (vibrations, heat) and near-total recovery of waste heat, further improving energy efficiency.

3. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Indoor vertical farms and highly controlled greenhouses, optimized by AI and robotics, could produce food year-round with minimal water and land use, even in harsh environments.
Precision Agriculture with Advanced Sensors: Nanotechnology-based sensors could monitor soil conditions, plant health, and environmental factors in real-time, enabling precise application of water, fertilizers, and other inputs, minimizing waste and environmental impact.
Cultured Meat and Alternative Proteins: Large-scale production of cultured meat and other alternative proteins could significantly reduce the environmental impact of animal agriculture.

4. Resource Extraction and Processing:

Sustainable Mining with Minimal Impact: Advanced robotics and AI could enable more precise and less invasive mining techniques, minimizing environmental damage and maximizing resource recovery.
Biomining: Using microorganisms to extract valuable metals and minerals from ores, reducing the need for traditional, energy-intensive mining methods.
Seawater Mining: Technologies to sustainably extract minerals and other resources from seawater, potentially providing access to vast reserves.

5. Construction and Infrastructure:

Self-Healing and Adaptive Materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be built with materials that can self-repair damage, extending their lifespan and reducing maintenance needs.
Bio-based Construction Materials: Using materials grown from biological sources (e.g., engineered wood, mycelium composites) to reduce the environmental impact of construction.
Smart Infrastructure: Integrating sensors and AI into infrastructure (roads, bridges, pipelines) to monitor their condition, optimize performance, and prevent failures.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could transform industries by 2140. The key themes are:

Closing material loops: Minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.
Decarbonizing energy: Shifting to renewable energy sources and improving energy efficiency.
Minimizing environmental impact: Protecting ecosystems and reducing pollution.
Optimizing resource use: Using resources more efficiently and sustainably.

By embracing these principles, industries can become more sustainable, resilient, and contribute to a healthier planet.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2140 ?

Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology of 2140 needs to begin now, focusing on long-term goals and anticipating future challenges. Here are some key areas of focus:

1. Fundamental Scientific Research:

Advanced Materials Science: Exploring new materials with unique properties, such as self-healing materials, bio-based materials, and nanomaterials with enhanced energy storage and conversion capabilities.
Energy Physics and Fusion Research: Investing in fundamental research on fusion energy, including plasma physics, materials science, and reactor design, to make fusion power a commercial reality.
Biological Engineering and Synthetic Biology: Developing engineered organisms for bio-manufacturing, bioremediation, and other sustainable applications.
Climate Science and Earth System Modeling: Improving our understanding of climate change and developing more accurate climate models to predict future impacts and inform mitigation strategies.

2. Technological Development:

Advanced Energy Technologies: Developing more efficient solar cells, advanced batteries, and other energy storage solutions.
Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies: Developing more efficient and cost-effective methods for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere and converting it into valuable products.
Resource Recovery and Recycling Technologies: Developing advanced recycling technologies to recover valuable materials from complex waste streams.
Precision Agriculture and Sustainable Food Production Technologies: Developing technologies for optimizing food production with minimal environmental impact.

3. System-Level Research:

Integrated Systems Modeling and Optimization: Developing models and tools to design and optimize complex sustainable systems, such as smart grids, circular economies, and sustainable cities.
Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Impact Analysis: Developing methods for assessing the environmental impact of technologies and products throughout their entire lifecycle.
Socio-Technical Research: Studying the social and economic factors that influence the adoption and implementation of sustainable technologies.

4. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and policymakers: Addressing the complex challenges of sustainability requires a collaborative approach that brings together expertise from different fields.
International research collaborations: Sharing knowledge and resources across borders to accelerate the development of sustainable technologies.

5. Long-Term Vision and Roadmapping:

Developing long-term visions and roadmaps for sustainable technology development: Setting ambitious goals and outlining the steps needed to achieve them.
Anticipating future challenges and opportunities: Identifying potential roadblocks and developing strategies to overcome them.

Specific R&D areas that could yield significant breakthroughs by 2140:

Room-temperature superconductors: Could revolutionize energy transmission and storage.
Highly efficient energy conversion technologies: Could significantly improve the efficiency of solar cells, fuel cells, and other energy technologies.
Advanced AI and machine learning: Could enable more efficient resource management, optimize complex systems, and accelerate scientific discovery.
Self-replicating and self-healing materials: Could revolutionize manufacturing and infrastructure.

By investing in these and other areas of research and development, we can lay the foundation for a future where sustainable technology plays a central role in creating a more resilient, equitable, and environmentally responsible world.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

^ Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (1993). “The Setting”. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton University Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-691-08631-1. JSTOR j.ctt7rpm1. I find the most useful conceptual definition for this study to be that given by Harvey Brooks, who has defined technology …as ‘knowledge of how to fulfill certain human purposes in a specifiable and reproducible way.’
^ Salomon 1984, pp. 117–118: “The first pole, that of the naturalisation of a new discipline within the university curriculum, was presented by Christian Wolff in 1728, in Chapter III of the “Preliminary discourse” to his Philosophia rationalisis sive Logica: ‘Technology is the science of skills and works of skill, or, if one prefers, the science of things made by man’s labour, chiefly through the use of his hands.'”
^ Mitcham, Carl (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-53196-1.
^ Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1996) [1891]. Greek-English Lexicon (Abridged ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-910205-8. OCLC 38307662.
^ Simpson, J.; Weiner, Edmund, eds. (1989). “technology”. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198611868.
^ Aristotle (2009). Brown, Lesley (ed.). The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford World’s Classics. Translated by Ross, David. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-19-921361-0. LCCN 2009005379. OCLC 246896490.
^ Salomon 1984, pp. 114–115.
^ Salomon 1984, p. 117.
^ Schatzberg, Eric (2006). “”Technik” Comes to America: Changing Meanings of “Technology” before 1930″. Technology and Culture. 47 (3): 486–512. doi:10.1353/tech.2006.0201. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 40061169. S2CID 143784033. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
^ Salomon 1984, p. 119: “With the industrial revolution and the important part England played in it, the word technology was to lose this meaning as the subject or thrust of a branch of education, as first in English and then in other languages it embodied all technical activity based on the application of science to practical ends.”
^ Schiffer, M. B. (2013). “Discovery Processes: Trial Models”. The Archaeology of Science. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. Vol. 9. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. pp. 185–198. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00077-0_13. ISBN 978-3319000770. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ The British Museum. “Our earliest technology?”. smarthistory.org. Archived from the original on 2 September 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
^ Minogue, K. (28 October 2010). “Stone Age Toolmakers Surprisingly Sophisticated”. science.org. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
^ Crump, Thomas (2001). A Brief History of Science. Constable & Robinson. p. 9. ISBN 978-1841192352.
^ Gowlett, J. A. J.; Wrangham, R. W. (1 March 2013). “Earliest fire in Africa: towards the convergence of archaeological evidence and the cooking hypothesis”. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa. 48 (1): 5–30. doi:10.1080/0067270X.2012.756754. ISSN 0067-270X. S2CID 163033909.
^ Stahl, Ann B. (1984). “Hominid dietary selection before fire”. Current Anthropology. 25 (2): 151–68. doi:10.1086/203106. JSTOR 2742818. S2CID 84337150.
^ Wrangham, R. (1 August 2017). “Control of Fire in the Paleolithic: Evaluating the Cooking Hypothesis”. Current Anthropology. 58 (S16): S303 – S313. doi:10.1086/692113. ISSN 0011-3204. S2CID 148798286. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
^ Dunbar, R. I. M.; Gamble, C.; Gowlett, J. A. J., eds. (2014). Lucy to Language: the Benchmark Papers. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199652594. OCLC 1124046527. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
^ Wade, Nicholas (15 July 2003). “Early Voices: The Leap to Language”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Shaar, Ron; Matmon, Ari; Horwitz, Liora K.; Ebert, Yael; Chazan, Michael; Arnold, M.; Aumaître, G.; Bourlès, D.; Keddadouche, K. (1 May 2021). “Magnetostratigraphy and cosmogenic dating of Wonderwerk Cave: New constraints for the chronology of the South African Earlier Stone Age”. Quaternary Science Reviews. 259: 106907. Bibcode:2021QSRv..25906907S. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106907. ISSN 0277-3791. S2CID 234833092.
^ Hallett, Emily Y.; Marean, Curtis W.; Steele, Teresa E.; Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban; Jacobs, Zenobia; Cerasoni, Jacopo Niccolò; Aldeias, Vera; Scerri, Eleanor M. L.; Olszewski, Deborah I.; Hajraoui, Mohamed Abdeljalil El; Dibble, Harold L. (24 September 2021). “A worked bone assemblage from 120,000–90,000 year old deposits at Contrebandiers Cave, Atlantic Coast, Morocco”. iScience. 24 (9): 102988. Bibcode:2021iSci…24j2988H. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102988. ISSN 2589-0042. PMC 8478944. PMID 34622180.
^ O’Neil, Dennis. “Evolution of Modern Humans: Archaic Homo sapiens Culture”. Palomar College. Archived from the original on 4 April 2007. Retrieved 31 March 2007.
^ Villa, Paola (1983). Terra Amata and the Middle Pleistocene archaeological record of southern France. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 303. ISBN 978-0520096622.
^ Cordaux, Richard; Stoneking, Mark (2003). “South Asia, the Andamanese, and the Genetic Evidence for an ‘Early’ Human Dispersal out of Africa” (PDF). American Journal of Human Genetics. 72 (6): 1586–1590, author reply 1590–93. doi:10.1086/375407. PMC 1180321. PMID 12817589. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2009. Retrieved 22 May 2007.
^ “‘Oldest remains’ outside Africa reset human migration clock”. phys.org. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
^ Harvati, Katerina; Röding, Carolin; Bosman, Abel M.; Karakostis, Fotios A.; Grün, Rainer; Stringer, Chris; Karkanas, Panagiotis; Thompson, Nicholas C.; Koutoulidis, Vassilis; Moulopoulos, Lia A.; Gorgoulis, Vassilis G.; Kouloukoussa, Mirsini (2019). “Apidima Cave fossils provide earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in Eurasia”. Nature. 571 (7766). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 500–504. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1376-z. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 31292546. S2CID 195873640. Archived from the original on 1 August 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
^ Kuijt, i., ed. (2002). Life in Neolithic Farming Communities: Social Organization, Identity, and Differentiation. Fundamental Issues in Archaeology. Springer New York. ISBN 9780306471667. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
^ Coghlan, H. H. (1943). “The Evolution of the Axe from Prehistoric to Roman Times”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 73 (1/2): 27–56. doi:10.2307/2844356. ISSN 0307-3114. JSTOR 2844356. Archived from the original on 26 September 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
^ Driscoll, Killian (2006). The early prehistory in the west of Ireland: Investigations into the social archaeology of the Mesolithic, west of the Shannon, Ireland. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
^ University of Chicago Press Journals (4 January 2006). “The First Baby Boom: Skeletal Evidence Shows Abrupt Worldwide Increase In Birth Rate During Neolithic Period”. ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
^ Sussman, Robert W.; Hall, Roberta L. (April 1972). “Child Transport, Family Size, and Increase in Human Population During the Neolithic”. Current Anthropology. 13 (2): 258–267. doi:10.1086/201274. JSTOR 2740977. S2CID 143449170.
^ Ferraro, Gary P. (2006). Cultural Anthropology: An Applied Perspective. The Thomson Corporation. ISBN 978-0495030393. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
^ Patterson, Gordon M. (1992). The Essentials of Ancient History. Research & Education Association. ISBN 978-0878917044. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2008.
^ Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge University Press.
^ Cramb, Alan W (1964). “A Short History of Metals”. Nature. 203 (4943): 337. Bibcode:1964Natur.203Q.337T. doi:10.1038/203337a0. S2CID 382712.
^ Hall, Harry Reginald Holland (1911). “Ceramics” . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 05 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 703–760, see page 708. The art of making a pottery consisting of a siliceous sandy body coated with a vitreous copper glaze seems to have been known unexpectedly early, possibly even as early as the period immediately preceding the Ist Dynasty (4000 B.C.).
^ Akanuma, Hideo. “The significance of the composition of excavated iron fragments taken from Stratum III at the site of Kaman-Kalehöyük, Turkey”. Anatolian Archaeological Studies. 14. Tokyo: Japanese Institute of Anatolian Archaeology.
^ “Ironware piece unearthed from Turkey found to be oldest steel”. The Hindu. 26 March 2009. Archived from the original on 29 March 2009. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
^ Usai, Donatella; Salvatori, Sandro. “The oldest representation of a Nile boat”. Antiquity. 81.
^ Postel, Sandra (1999). “Egypt’s Nile Valley Basin Irrigation”. Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last?. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393319378. Archived from the original on 19 November 2020. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
^ Crawford, Harriet (2013). The Sumerian World. New York & London: Routledge. pp. 34–43. ISBN 978-0203096604. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
^ Potts, D.T. (2012). A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. p. 285.
^ Childe, V. Gordon (1928). New Light on the Most Ancient East. p. 110.
^ Anthony, David A. (2007). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0691058870.
^ Gasser, Aleksander (March 2003). “World’s Oldest Wheel Found in Slovenia”. Republic of Slovenia Government Communication Office. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
^ Kramer, Samuel Noah (1963). The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 290. ISBN 978-0226452388. Archived from the original on 8 August 2014. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Moorey, Peter Roger Stuart (1999) [1994]. Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries: The Archaeological Evidence. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. p. 146. ISBN 978-1575060422. Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Lay, M G (1992). Ways of the World. Sydney: Primavera Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-1875368051.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g Gregersen, Erik (2012). The Complete History of Wheeled Transportation: From Cars and Trucks to Buses and Bikes. New York: Britannica Educational Publishing. p. 130. ISBN 978-1615307012. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g Aicher, Peter J. (1995). Guide to the Aqueducts of Ancient Rome. Wauconda, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Inc. p. 6. ISBN 978-0865162822. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Eslamian, Saeid (2014). Handbook of Engineering Hydrology: Environmental Hydrology and Water Management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. pp. 171–175. ISBN 978-1466552500. Archived from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Lechner, Norbert (2012). Plumbing, Electricity, Acoustics: Sustainable Design Methods for Architecture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 106. ISBN 978-1118014752. Archived from the original on 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
^ Davids, K.; De Munck, B., eds. (2019). Innovation and Creativity in Late Medieval and Early Modern European Cities. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315588605. ISBN 978-1317116530. S2CID 148764971. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Courtenay, W. J.; Miethke, J.; Priest, D. B., eds. (2000). Universities and Schooling in Medieval Society. BRILL. ISBN 978-9004113510. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Deming, D. (2014). Science and Technology in World History, Volume 3: The Black Death, the Renaissance, the Reformation and the Scientific Revolution. McFarland. ISBN 978-0786490868.
^ Stearns, P. N. (2020). The Industrial Revolution in World History. Routledge. ISBN 978-0813347295.
^ Mokyr, J. (2000). “The Second Industrial Revolution, 1870–1914” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
^ Black, B. C. (2022). To Have and Have Not: Energy in World History. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1538105047. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Albion, Robert G. (1 January 1933). “The Communication Revolution, 1760–1933”. Transactions of the Newcomen Society. 14 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1179/tns.1933.002. ISSN 0372-0187. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
^ Agar, J. (2012). Science in the 20th Century and Beyond. Polity. ISBN 978-0745634692. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Goldin, C.; Katz, L. F. (2010). The Race between Education and Technology. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674037731. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Solow, Robert M. (1957). “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 39 (3): 312–320. doi:10.2307/1926047. ISSN 0034-6535. JSTOR 1926047. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 15 January 2023.
^ Bresnahan, Timothy F.; Trajtenberg, M. (1 January 1995). “General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?”. Journal of Econometrics. 65 (1): 83–108. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T. ISSN 0304-4076.
^ Wrigley, E. A (13 March 2013). “Energy and the English Industrial Revolution”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 371 (1986): 20110568. Bibcode:2013RSPTA.37110568W. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0568. PMID 23359739. S2CID 10624423.
^ Persily, Nathaniel; Tucker, Joshua A., eds. (2020). Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform. SSRC Anxieties of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108890960. hdl:11245.1/cf2f5b6a-8dc8-4400-bc38-3317b0164499. ISBN 978-1108835558. S2CID 243715477. Archived from the original on 19 October 2022. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ Autor, D. H. (2015). “Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace”. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 29 (3): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3. hdl:1721.1/109476. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022.
^ Bessen, J. E. (3 October 2016). “How Computer Automation Affects Occupations: Technology, Jobs, and Skills”. Economic Perspectives on Employment & Labor Law EJournal. 15–49. Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2690435. S2CID 29968989. SSRN 2690435. Archived from the original on 10 March 2024. Retrieved 20 January 2024.
^ “Robots and Artificial Intelligence”. igmchicago.org. Initiative on Global Markets. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
^ “The Future of Jobs Report 2020” (PDF). www3.weforum.org. October 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
^ “Robots and AI Taking Over Jobs: What to Know | Built In”. builtin.com. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
^ “How many jobs do robots really replace?”. MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 4 May 2020. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
^ Acemoglu, Daron; Restrepo, Pascual (1 June 2020). “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets”. Journal of Political Economy. 128 (6): 2188–2244. doi:10.1086/705716. hdl:1721.1/130324. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 7468879. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
^ “Remarks Upon Signing Bill Creating the National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress. | The American Presidency Project”. www.presidency.ucsb.edu. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
^ “Technology and the American Economy” (PDF). files.eric.ed.gov. February 1966. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
^ “If Robots Take Our Jobs, Will They Make It Up to Us?”. The University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Archived from the original on 25 March 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
^ “GovInfo”. www.govinfo.gov n. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
^ “H.R.11611 – An Act to establish a National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress”. www.congress.gov. 1963. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Rosenberg, Elizabeth; Harrell, Peter E.; Shiffman, Gary M.; Dorshimer, Sam (2019). “Financial Technology and National Security”. Center for a New American Security. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
^ “U.S. takes aim at North Korean crypto laundering”. NBC News. 6 May 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
^ “U.S. ties North Korean hacker group to Axie Infinity crypto theft”. NBC News. 15 April 2022. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
^ Austin, David; Macauley, Molly K. (1 December 2001). “Cutting Through Environmental Issues: Technology as a double-edged sword”. Brookings. Archived from the original on 9 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
^ Grainger, Alan; Francisco, Herminia A.; Tiraswat, Penporn (July 2003). “The impact of changes in agricultural technology on long-term trends in deforestation”. The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use. 20 (3): 209–223. Bibcode:2003LUPol..20..209G. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00009-7. Archived from the original on 10 February 2023. Retrieved 10 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
^ EPA (19 January 2017). “Climate Impacts on Ecosystems”. Archived from the original on 27 January 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2019. Mountain and arctic ecosystems and species are particularly sensitive to climate change… As ocean temperatures warm and the acidity of the ocean increases, bleaching and coral die-offs are likely to become more frequent.
^ Union of Concerned Scientists (6 November 2017). “What is Climate Engineering?”. www.ucsusa.org. Retrieved 28 October 2024.
^ Chaudhry, Imran Sharif; Ali, Sajid; Bhatti, Shaukat Hussain; Anser, Muhammad Khalid; Khan, Ahmad Imran; Nazar, Raima (October 2021). “Dynamic common correlated effects of technological innovations and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from East-Asia and Pacific countries”. Environmental Science & Policy. 124 (Environmental Science & Policy): 313–323. Bibcode:2021ESPol.124..313C. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.007. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023. Retrieved 14 February 2023 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
^ Smol, J. P. (2009). Pollution of Lakes and Rivers : a Paleoenvironmental Perspective (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. p. 135. ISBN 978-1444307573. OCLC 476272945. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Franssen, M.; Lokhorst, G.-J.; van de Poel, I. (2018). “Philosophy of Technology”. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b de Vries, M. J.; Verkerk, M. J.; Hoogland, J.; van der Stoep, J. (2015). Philosophy of Technology : An Introduction for Technology and Business Students. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1317445715. OCLC 907132694. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
^ Brey, P. (2000). Mitcham, C. (ed.). “Theories of Technology as Extension of Human Faculties”. Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology. 19.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Johnson, Deborah G.; Wetmore, Jameson M. (2021). Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262539968. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
^ Dusek, Val (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Wiley. ISBN 978-1405111621. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
^ Postman, Neil (1993). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage.
^ Marcuse, H. (2004). Technology, War and Fascism: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, Volume 1. Routledge. ISBN 978-1134774661. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Hansson, Sven Ove (2017). The Ethics of Technology: Methods and Approaches. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1783486595. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
^ Al-Rodhan, Nayef. “The Many Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 8 April 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2019.
^ Luppicini, R. (2008). “The emerging field of Technoethics”. In Luppicini; R. Adell (eds.). Handbook of Research on Technoethics. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
^ Veruggio, Gianmarco (2011). “The Roboethics Roadmap”. EURON Roboethics Atelier. Scuola di Robotica: 2. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.466.2810.
^ Anderson, Michael; Anderson, Susan Leigh, eds. (2011). Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521112352.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Bell, W. Foundations of Futures Studies, Volume 1: Human Science for a New Era. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1412823791. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
^ “About us”. cser.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 30 December 2017. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Gottlieb, J. (1 May 2022). “Discounting, Buck-Passing, and Existential Risk Mitigation: The Case of Space Colonization”. Space Policy. 60: 101486. Bibcode:2022SpPol..6001486G. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101486. ISSN 0265-9646. S2CID 247718992.
^ “Stanford Existential Risks Initiative”. cisac.fsi.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 4 October 2022.
^ Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. (2011). Global Catastrophic Risks. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0199606504. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bostrom, Nick (6 September 2019). “The Vulnerable World Hypothesis”. Global Policy. 10 (4): 455–476. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12718. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 203169705.
^ Kurzweil, Ray (2005). “GNR: Three Overlapping Revolutions”. The Singularity is Near. Penguin. ISBN 978-1101218884.
^ Kompridis, N. (2009). “Technology’s challenge to democracy: What of the human” (PDF). Parrhesia. 8 (1): 20–33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
^ McShane, Sveta (19 April 2016). “Ray Kurzweil Predicts Three Technologies Will Define Our Future”. Singularity Hub. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
^ Poole, C. P. Jr.; Owens, F. J. (2003). Introduction to Nanotechnology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0471079354.
^ Vince, G. (3 July 2003). “Nanotechnology may create new organs”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Lee, Sukhan; Suh, Il Hong (2008). Recent Progress in Robotics: Viable Robotic Service to Human: An Edition of the Selected Papers from the 13th International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 3. ISBN 978-3540767282. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
^ Grace, K.; Salvatier, J.; Dafoe, A.; Zhang, B.; Evans, O. (31 July 2018). “Viewpoint: When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts”. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 62: 729–754. doi:10.1613/jair.1.11222. ISSN 1076-9757. S2CID 8746462. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Segal, H. P. (2005). Technological Utopianism in American Culture (20th Anniversary ed.). Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0815630616. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Roots and Core Themes”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part1. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Istvan, Zoltan (1 February 2015). “A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging”. Interalia Magazine. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ More, M.; Vita-More, N., eds. (29 April 2013). “Future Trajectories: Singularity”. The Transhumanist Reader. Wiley. pp. 361–363. doi:10.1002/9781118555927.part8. ISBN 978-1118334294. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Blackford, R.; Bostrom, N.; Dupuy, J.-P. (2011). H±: Transhumanism and Its Critics. Metanexus Institute. ISBN 978-1456815653. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
^ Jones, Steven E. (2013). Against Technology: From the Luddites to Neo-Luddism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1135522391. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Kelman, David (1 June 2020). “Politics in a Small Room: Subterranean Babel in Piglia’s El camino de Ida”. The Yearbook of Comparative Literature. 63: 179–201. doi:10.3138/ycl.63.005. ISSN 0084-3695. S2CID 220494877. Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
^ Fleming, Sean (7 May 2021). “The Unabomber and the origins of anti-tech radicalism”. Journal of Political Ideologies. 27 (2): 207–225. doi:10.1080/13569317.2021.1921940. ISSN 1356-9317.
^ Vannini, Phillip; Jonathan Taggart (2013). “Voluntary simplicity, involuntary complexities, and the pull of remove: The radical ruralities of off-grid lifestyles”. Environment and Planning A. 45 (2): 295–311. Bibcode:2013EnPlA..45..295V. doi:10.1068/a4564. S2CID 143970611.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scranton, Philip (1 May 2006). “Urgency, uncertainty, and innovation: Building jet engines in postwar America”. Management & Organizational History. 1 (2): 127–157. doi:10.1177/1744935906064096. ISSN 1744-9359. S2CID 143813033.
^ Di Nucci Pearce, M. R.; Pearce, David (1989). “Technology vs. Science: The Cognitive Fallacy”. Synthese. 81 (3): 405–419. doi:10.1007/BF00869324. ISSN 0039-7857. JSTOR 20116729. S2CID 46975083. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
^ Skolimowski, Henryk (1966). “The Structure of Thinking in Technology”. Technology and Culture. 7 (3): 371–383. doi:10.2307/3101935. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 3101935.
^ Brooks, H. (1 September 1994). “The relationship between science and technology”. Research Policy. Special Issue in Honor of Nathan Rosenberg. 23 (5): 477–486. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01001-3. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2012). Antifragile. Penguin Random House. OCLC 1252833169.
^ Hare, Ronald (1970). The Birth of Penicillin, and the Disarming of Microbes. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0049250055. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
^ Wise, George (1985). “Science and Technology”. Osiris. 2nd Series. 1: 229–46. doi:10.1086/368647. S2CID 144475553.
^ Guston, David H. (2000). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521653183.
^ Taleb, N. N. (12 December 2012). “Understanding is a Poor Substitute for Convexity (Antifragility)” (PDF). fooledbyrandomness.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 June 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
^ Narin, Francis; Olivastro, Dominic (1 June 1992). “Status report: Linkage between technology and science”. Research Policy. 21 (3): 237–249. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(92)90018-Y. ISSN 0048-7333. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
^ Krieger, Joshua L.; Schnitzer, Monika; Watzinger, Martin (1 May 2019). “Standing on the Shoulders of Science” (PDF). SSRN 3401853. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 September 2022. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
^ Oakley, K. P. (1976). “Man the Tool-Maker”. Nature. 199 (4898): 1042–1043. Bibcode:1963Natur.199U1042.. doi:10.1038/1991042e0. ISBN 978-0226612706. S2CID 4298952.
^ Sagan, Carl; Druyan, Ann; Leakey, Richard. “Chimpanzee Tool Use”. Archived from the original on 21 September 2006. Retrieved 13 February 2007.
^ Rincon, Paul (7 June 2005). “Sponging dolphins learn from mum”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 4 December 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
^ Schmid, Randolph E. (4 October 2007). “Crows use tools to find food”. NBC News. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
^ Rutz, C.; Bluff, L.A.; Weir, A.A.S.; Kacelnik, A. (4 October 2007). “Video cameras on wild birds”. Science. 318 (5851): 765. Bibcode:2007Sci…318..765R. doi:10.1126/science.1146788. PMID 17916693. S2CID 28785984.
^ McGrew, W. C (1992). Chimpanzee Material Culture. Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0521423717.
^ Boesch, Christophe; Boesch, Hedwige (1984). “Mental map in wild chimpanzees: An analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking”. Primates. 25 (2): 160–170. doi:10.1007/BF02382388. S2CID 24073884.
^ Brahic, Catherine (15 January 2009). “Nut-cracking monkeys find the right tool for the job”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 15 November 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
^ Müller, G.; Watling, J. (24 June 2016). The engineering in beaver dams. River Flow 2016: Eighth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics. St. Louis: University of Southampton Institutional Research Repository. Archived from the original on 24 September 2022. Retrieved 29 September 2022.
^ Thomas Michaud (2008). “Science fiction and politics: Cyberpunk science fiction as political philosophy”. New Boundaries in Political Science Fiction. By Hassler, Donald M. University of South Carolina Press. pp. 65–77 [75–76]. ISBN 978-1570037368.