Sustainable Technology of 2120

Sustainable Technology of 2120 ?

Sustainable technology in 2120 is likely to be far more advanced than what we have today, driven by the urgent need to address climate change and resource depletion. Here are some potential areas of development:

Energy:

• Advanced solar energy: Solar panels could become significantly more efficient, possibly through the use of perovskite or other novel materials. They might also be integrated into everyday surfaces like windows and roads.  
• Fusion power: Nuclear fusion, if achieved, could provide a clean and virtually limitless source of energy.  
• Energy storage: Advanced battery technologies, such as solid-state batteries or other novel electrochemical storage solutions, could enable efficient storage of renewable energy.  
• Smart grids: Intelligent energy networks could optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.  

Environment:

• Carbon capture and utilization: Technologies that capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and convert it into useful products could become widespread.
• Advanced recycling: New methods could enable the efficient recycling of complex materials, reducing the need for virgin resources.
• Precision agriculture: Technologies that use data and automation to optimize farming practices could reduce water and fertilizer use.
• Environmental remediation: New techniques could be developed to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.

Materials:

• Bioplastics and biodegradable materials: Increased use of materials derived from renewable resources that can decompose naturally.
• Self-healing materials: Materials that can repair themselves could extend the lifespan of products and reduce waste.  
• Sustainable construction materials: New types of concrete, timber, and other building materials with lower environmental impacts.

Computing:

• Green computing: More energy-efficient hardware and software could reduce the environmental footprint of computing.  
• Quantum computing: This could enable breakthroughs in materials science, chemistry, and other fields relevant to sustainability.

Transportation:

• Electric and autonomous vehicles: These could become the dominant form of transportation, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
• Hyperloop and other high-speed transportation: New modes of transportation could reduce travel times and energy consumption.  

Other areas:

• Water purification and conservation: New technologies could provide access to clean water and reduce water waste.  
• Waste management: Advanced waste sorting and treatment facilities could minimize landfill use.  
• Sustainable cities: Urban planning that prioritizes walkability, green spaces, and resource efficiency.

It’s important to note that this is just a speculative look into the future. The actual technologies that will be in use in 2120 could be very different. However, it’s clear that sustainable technology will play a crucial role in shaping our future.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2120 ?

Sustainable technology in 2120 will likely be a highly advanced and integrated system designed to address the critical environmental and resource challenges of the time. Imagine a world where technology not only minimizes harm to the planet but actively works to restore and regenerate it. Here are some key areas of focus:

Energy:

• Ubiquitous renewable energy: Solar energy will be harvested from every possible surface – buildings, roads, even clothing. Fusion power plants will provide a stable and abundant source of clean energy.
• Advanced energy storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions will be crucial for balancing energy supply and demand, potentially using advanced batteries, supercapacitors, or even new forms of energy storage we haven’t discovered yet.
• Global smart grids: Intelligent energy networks will optimize energy distribution on a planetary scale, minimizing waste and ensuring efficient use of resources.  

Environment:

• Atmospheric carbon capture: Large-scale systems will actively remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, potentially mimicking natural processes like forests and oceans.
• Ecosystem restoration: Technology will play a key role in restoring damaged ecosystems, using advanced techniques like genetic engineering and ecological monitoring.  
• Precision agriculture: Farming will be highly optimized using data and automation, minimizing water and fertilizer use while maximizing yields.  
• Advanced recycling and resource management: Waste will be seen as a valuable resource, with advanced technologies capable of recycling even the most complex materials at a molecular level.

Materials:

• Biodegradable and bio-based materials: Plastics and other materials will be made from renewable resources and designed to decompose naturally, eliminating waste and pollution.
• Self-healing materials: Materials that can repair themselves will extend the lifespan of products and reduce the need for replacements.  
• Smart materials: Materials with embedded sensors and actuators will be able to adapt to their environment and optimize their performance.  

Computing:

• Quantum computing: This will revolutionize fields like materials science, chemistry, and medicine, leading to breakthroughs in sustainable technologies.
• Neuromorphic computing: This will enable more energy-efficient computing by mimicking the human brain.

Transportation:

• Autonomous electric vehicles: These will be the norm, with advanced AI systems optimizing traffic flow and minimizing energy consumption.
• High-speed transportation: Technologies like hyperloop will enable fast and efficient travel over long distances.

Other areas:

• Water purification and desalination: Advanced technologies will provide access to clean water even in arid regions.  
• Sustainable cities: Urban areas will be designed to be self-sufficient and environmentally friendly, with green buildings, efficient transportation systems, and local food production.

In 2120, sustainable technology will not be just a set of individual solutions but a fully integrated system that works in harmony with the planet. It will be a world where technology is used to create a truly sustainable and thriving future for all

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2120 ?

It seems like there might be a slight typo in your question. Did you perhaps mean “Who is required to develop Sustainable Technology of 2120?”

If so, the answer is: Everyone!

Developing sustainable technology for the future is a collective responsibility that requires the involvement of various actors:

• Scientists and Engineers: They are crucial for researching and developing new sustainable technologies in areas like energy, materials, and environmental remediation.  
• Governments: They need to create policies and regulations that support the development and adoption of sustainable technologies, as well as invest in research and infrastructure.  
• Businesses: They have a responsibility to adopt sustainable practices and invest in the development of sustainable products and services.  
• Individuals: We all have a role to play in adopting sustainable lifestyles and supporting businesses and governments that prioritize sustainability.  
• International organizations: They can facilitate collaboration and knowledge sharing between countries and promote global sustainability initiatives.  

Ultimately, creating a sustainable future requires a global effort with everyone contributing their part.

If your question was indeed “What is Sustainable Technology of 2120?”, I have provided detailed answers in my previous responses, outlining the potential advancements in various fields like energy, environment, materials, computing, and transportation.

I’m ready to provide more information or clarify any further questions you might have.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2120 ?

It seems you’re asking about the urgency of developing sustainable technology for the future. While the specific technologies envisioned for 2120 may not be fully realized until then, the need to develop and implement sustainable solutions is already critical and becomes increasingly urgent with each passing day.

Here’s why:

• Climate Change: The effects of climate change are already being felt around the world, with rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and disruptions to ecosystems. We need to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions and develop technologies to adapt to the changing climate.  
• Resource Depletion: We are consuming natural resources at an unsustainable rate, and many resources are becoming scarce. We need to develop technologies that use resources more efficiently and promote circular economy models.  
• Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and other forms of environmental degradation are harming ecosystems and human health. We need to develop technologies to prevent pollution, restore damaged ecosystems, and protect biodiversity.  

Therefore, while we might imagine the culmination of these efforts in the advanced technologies of 2120, the work needs to begin now. Every step we take today towards developing and implementing sustainable technologies brings us closer to a more sustainable future and mitigates the risks of environmental catastrophe.  

In essence, the “when” is not a specific date in the future but rather a continuous and urgent “now.” We need to:

• Start now: Invest in research and development of sustainable technologies.
• Act now: Implement existing sustainable solutions and adopt sustainable practices.
• Continue now: Persist in our efforts to innovate and improve sustainable technologies over time.

By acting now, we can ensure that the sustainable technologies of 2120 are not just a distant dream but a reality that safeguards our planet and future generations.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2120 ?

You’re asking a very important question about the scope of sustainable technology in the future. The answer is: Everywhere!

Sustainable technology in 2120 will be required and integrated into virtually every aspect of human life and across the globe. Here’s a breakdown of the key areas:

• Urban Environments: Cities will be at the forefront of sustainable development, with green buildings, efficient transportation systems, smart grids, urban farming, and advanced waste management systems.
• Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, renewable energy generation, and nature conservation will be crucial for maintaining healthy ecosystems and supporting rural communities.
• Industrial Sectors: Manufacturing, energy production, and other industries will need to adopt sustainable practices to reduce their environmental impact and conserve resources.  
• Homes and Buildings: Our living spaces will be designed to be energy-efficient, use sustainable materials, and minimize waste.
• Transportation Networks: Sustainable transportation systems, including electric vehicles, high-speed trains, and other innovative modes of transport, will be essential for reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
• Natural Environments: Sustainable technologies will be crucial for protecting and restoring natural ecosystems, conserving biodiversity, and mitigating the effects of climate change.
• Global Infrastructure: Sustainable technologies will be needed to build and maintain infrastructure, including energy grids, water systems, and transportation networks, in a way that minimizes environmental impact.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2120 will be a pervasive and integrated system that touches every corner of the planet and every aspect of human life. It will be essential for creating a truly sustainable and thriving future for all.

Furthermore, it’s important to recognize that the need for sustainable technology is not limited to specific geographical locations. It’s a global imperative that requires action in:

• Developed Countries: These countries have a responsibility to lead the way in developing and implementing sustainable technologies and assisting developing countries in their transition to sustainability.
• Developing Countries: These countries need access to sustainable technologies to support their economic development and improve living standards without compromising environmental sustainability.  

Ultimately, the “where” of sustainable technology in 2120 is not a specific place but rather a global context that encompasses all human activities and ecosystems.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2120 ?

You’re asking about the methods and approaches needed to achieve the vision of sustainable technology in 2120. It’s a complex challenge that requires a multi-faceted approach. Here’s how it will be achieved:

1. Scientific Research and Development:

• Fundamental Research: Investing in basic scientific research to understand the fundamental principles of nature and develop new materials, energy sources, and technologies.
• Applied Research: Focusing on developing practical applications of scientific discoveries, such as new types of solar cells, batteries, and carbon capture technologies.  
• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Encouraging collaboration between scientists from different fields, such as physics, chemistry, biology, and engineering, to foster innovation.

2. Technological Innovation:

• Breakthrough Technologies: Pursuing disruptive innovations that can revolutionize existing technologies and create entirely new solutions, such as fusion power and advanced materials.
• Incremental Improvements: Continuously improving existing technologies to make them more efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly.
• Technology Transfer: Facilitating the transfer of sustainable technologies from research labs to the market and from developed countries to developing countries.

3. Policy and Regulation:

• Government Policies: Implementing policies that support the development and adoption of sustainable technologies, such as carbon pricing, renewable energy incentives, and environmental regulations.  
• International Agreements: Establishing international agreements to address global environmental challenges and promote sustainable development.
• Standards and Certifications: Developing standards and certifications to ensure the quality and sustainability of products and services.

4. Economic and Social Factors:

• Investment and Funding: Providing sufficient funding for research, development, and deployment of sustainable technologies.
• Market Mechanisms: Creating market mechanisms that incentivize sustainable practices and make sustainable products and services more competitive.
• Public Awareness and Education: Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainability and educating people about how to adopt sustainable lifestyles.
• Social Acceptance: Promoting social acceptance of new technologies and addressing any concerns or ethical considerations.

5. Global Collaboration:

• International Cooperation: Fostering international cooperation between governments, businesses, and research institutions to share knowledge, resources, and technologies.
• Capacity Building: Supporting developing countries in building their capacity to develop and implement sustainable technologies.

In essence, achieving sustainable technology in 2120 requires a combination of scientific breakthroughs, technological innovation, supportive policies, economic incentives, social awareness, and global collaboration. It’s a continuous process of learning, adapting, and innovating to create a truly sustainable future.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2120 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific “case study” for Sustainable Technology of 2120 because it’s so far in the future. We can’t point to a real-world example that fully embodies that vision. However, we can create a hypothetical case study to illustrate how these technologies might integrate and function in a future scenario.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Sustainable City of “Ecoville” in 2120

Setting: Ecoville is a coastal city built in a region previously vulnerable to rising sea levels.

Key Sustainable Technologies Integrated:

• Energy:
  • Fusion Power Plant: Ecoville is powered by a nearby fusion power plant, providing clean and abundant energy.
  • Integrated Solar Skins: Buildings are covered in advanced solar “skins” that generate energy while also regulating temperature and air quality.
  • Smart Grid: A highly sophisticated AI-controlled grid optimizes energy distribution, storage (using advanced solid-state batteries and other novel methods), and usage in real-time.
• Environment:
  • Atmospheric Carbon Capture Hubs: Strategically placed hubs actively remove CO2 from the air, converting it into usable materials for construction or other industries.
  • Bio-Integrated Water Management: The city’s water system mimics natural ecosystems, using biofiltration and advanced purification to recycle and reuse water efficiently.
  • Vertical Farms and Aquaponics: Food is grown locally in vertical farms and aquaponic systems, minimizing transportation needs and maximizing resource efficiency.  
• Materials:
  • Biodegradable Construction: Buildings are constructed from bio-based materials that can be easily recycled or composted at the end of their lifespan.
  • Self-Healing Infrastructure: Roads, bridges, and other infrastructure are made from self-healing materials that automatically repair damage, reducing maintenance and waste.  
• Transportation:
  • Autonomous Electric Fleets: The city is served by a network of autonomous electric vehicles and advanced public transportation systems, optimizing traffic flow and minimizing emissions.
  • Hyperloop Connectivity: A hyperloop system connects Ecoville to other cities, enabling rapid and energy-efficient long-distance travel.

Outcome:

• Ecoville has a minimal carbon footprint and actively contributes to removing CO2 from the atmosphere.
• The city is resilient to climate change impacts, such as rising sea levels and extreme weather events.
• Residents enjoy a high quality of life with access to clean energy, water, and food.
• Ecoville serves as a model for other cities around the world, demonstrating the potential of sustainable technology to create a thriving and environmentally friendly future.

Why this is a useful “case study”:

• Illustrates Integration: It shows how various sustainable technologies can work together in a real-world setting.
• Highlights Benefits: It demonstrates the positive outcomes of adopting these technologies, such as reduced emissions, increased resilience, and improved quality of life.
• Provides a Vision: It offers a tangible vision of what a sustainable future might look like, inspiring further innovation and action.

While this is a fictional example, it’s based on extrapolations of current trends and potential future advancements in sustainable technology. It serves as a reminder that the future of sustainability is not just about individual technologies but also about how we integrate them into our lives and communities

.COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2120 ? 

While a formal “white paper” with academic citations is difficult to create for such a distant future, I can offer a structured outline that resembles one, synthesizing the key aspects we’ve discussed:

White Paper: Envisioning Sustainable Technology in 2120

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2120. It examines the driving forces behind this development, key technological areas of focus, and the integrated systems that will be necessary to achieve a truly sustainable future. The paper emphasizes the urgency of current action to realize this vision.

1. Introduction:

• The Growing Imperative for Sustainability: Outlines the current environmental challenges (climate change, resource depletion, pollution) and the increasing need for sustainable solutions.
• The Time Horizon: Explains the focus on 2120 as a long-term vision to inspire innovation and strategic planning.
• Defining Sustainable Technology: Establishes a working definition of sustainable technology as technology that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

2. Key Technological Domains:  

• 2.1 Energy:
  • Fusion Power: Discusses the potential of fusion energy as a clean and abundant energy source.
  • Advanced Solar Energy: Explores advancements in solar cell technology, integration into everyday surfaces, and energy storage solutions.
  • Smart Grids and Energy Distribution: Examines intelligent energy networks and their role in optimizing energy use.
• 2.2 Environment:
  • Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Utilization: Details technologies for removing CO2 from the atmosphere and converting it into valuable products.
  • Ecosystem Restoration and Remediation: Discusses technologies for restoring damaged ecosystems and cleaning up pollution.
  • Precision Agriculture and Resource Management: Explores data-driven approaches to optimize farming practices and minimize resource use.
• 2.3 Materials:
  • Biodegradable and Bio-based Materials: Examines the development and use of sustainable materials derived from renewable resources.
  • Self-Healing and Smart Materials: Discusses materials that can repair themselves and adapt to their environment.
• 2.4 Computing:
  • Quantum Computing and its Applications: Explores the potential of quantum computing to revolutionize fields relevant to sustainability.
  • Energy-Efficient Computing and AI: Discusses the development of more energy-efficient hardware and software.
• 2.5 Transportation:
  • Autonomous Electric Vehicles and Smart Mobility: Examines the future of transportation with autonomous vehicles and integrated transportation systems.
  • High-Speed Transportation and Infrastructure: Discusses advancements in high-speed travel and sustainable infrastructure development.

3. Integrated Systems and Solutions:

• Sustainable Cities and Communities: Explores the concept of sustainable urban planning and the integration of various technologies in urban environments.
• Circular Economy Models: Discusses the transition to circular economy models that minimize waste and maximize resource use.
• Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing: Emphasizes the importance of international cooperation in developing and implementing sustainable technologies.

4. The Path to 2120: Current Actions and Future Directions:

• The Urgency of Current Action: Reinforces the need to begin implementing sustainable solutions immediately to address current environmental challenges.
• Research and Development Priorities: Identifies key areas for research and development to accelerate the transition to sustainability.
• Policy and Investment Recommendations: Suggests policy changes and investment strategies to support the development and adoption of sustainable technologies.

5. Conclusion:

• Reiterates the vision of a sustainable future enabled by advanced technology.
• Emphasizes the importance of collective action and long-term planning to achieve this vision.

Key Considerations for this “White Paper”:

• Speculative Nature: It’s important to acknowledge the speculative nature of predicting technology so far into the future.
• Focus on Trends: The focus should be on extrapolating current trends and potential breakthroughs in scientific research.
• Interdisciplinary Approach: The paper should draw on expertise from various fields, including science, engineering, economics, and social sciences.

This structured outline provides a framework for a more comprehensive exploration of sustainable technology in 2120. While it’s not a traditional white paper with empirical data, it offers a valuable thought experiment and a roadmap for future action.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2120 ?

Predicting the precise industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2120 requires a degree of speculation, but we can extrapolate from current trends and potential advancements to envision some key areas:

1. Manufacturing:

• Closed-Loop Production Systems: Manufacturing processes will operate on closed-loop principles, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization. Advanced recycling technologies will enable the recovery and reuse of virtually all materials.
• Bio-Integrated Manufacturing: Industries will increasingly utilize bio-based materials and processes, such as using engineered microorganisms to produce chemicals and materials.
• Personalized and On-Demand Manufacturing: Advanced 3D printing and other additive manufacturing technologies will enable personalized and on-demand production, reducing waste and transportation needs.  
• AI-Powered Optimization: Artificial intelligence will optimize manufacturing processes in real-time, minimizing energy consumption, waste generation, and environmental impact.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

• Fusion Energy Plants: Fusion power will become a primary source of energy for industries, providing a clean, safe, and virtually limitless supply.
• Decentralized Energy Grids: Smart grids will enable the efficient distribution of energy from various renewable sources, including solar, wind, and geothermal, with advanced energy storage solutions balancing supply and demand.  
• Energy Harvesting: Industries will utilize energy harvesting technologies to capture and convert waste heat, vibrations, and other forms of energy into usable power.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

• Sustainable Mining and Resource Extraction: New technologies will minimize the environmental impact of mining and resource extraction, with a focus on reducing waste, restoring ecosystems, and utilizing less energy-intensive methods.
• Advanced Material Processing: New techniques will enable the efficient processing of materials with minimal waste and energy consumption, potentially using bio-based processes or advanced chemical reactions.

4. Construction and Infrastructure:

• Bio-Based Construction Materials: Industries will utilize sustainable construction materials derived from renewable resources, such as timber, bamboo, and bio-based composites.  
• Self-Healing Infrastructure: Infrastructure will be built using self-healing materials that can automatically repair damage, reducing maintenance needs and extending lifespan.
• Modular and Adaptable Buildings: Buildings will be designed to be modular and adaptable, allowing for easy reconfiguration and reuse, minimizing waste and resource consumption.

5. Waste Management and Remediation:

• Molecular Recycling: Advanced recycling technologies will enable the breakdown of waste materials at the molecular level, allowing for the recovery of valuable resources and the creation of new products.  
• Bioremediation: Industries will utilize bioremediation techniques to clean up pollution and restore contaminated environments, using microorganisms to break down pollutants.

Cross-Cutting Industrial Applications:

• AI and Machine Learning: AI will be used across all industries to optimize processes, reduce waste, and improve efficiency.
• Sensor Networks and IoT: Advanced sensor networks and the Internet of Things (IoT) will provide real-time data on industrial processes, enabling better monitoring, control, and optimization.  
• Digital Twins: Digital twins of industrial facilities and processes will be used to simulate and optimize performance, reducing costs and environmental impact.  

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology might be applied in industry in 2120. The key takeaway is that sustainability will be deeply integrated into all industrial processes, driving innovation and creating a more efficient, resilient, and environmentally friendly industrial sector.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2120 ?

Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology in 2120 needs to begin now, focusing on long-term goals and anticipating future challenges. Here’s a breakdown of key R&D areas:

1. Fundamental Science:

• Materials Science:
  • Developing new materials with unprecedented properties, such as superconductivity at room temperature, ultra-high strength, and self-healing capabilities.
  • Exploring bio-inspired materials and biomimicry to create sustainable and efficient materials based on natural designs.
  • Investigating metamaterials and their potential for energy harvesting, light manipulation, and other applications.
• Energy Physics:
  • Fundamental research into fusion energy to achieve controlled and commercially viable fusion reactors.
  • Exploring new energy conversion methods beyond current photovoltaic and wind turbine technologies, such as advanced thermoelectrics or zero-point energy research (though highly speculative).
  • Investigating novel energy storage mechanisms beyond current battery technologies, such as supercapacitors with vastly improved energy density or new chemical storage methods.
• Environmental Science:
  • Deepening our understanding of complex ecosystems and their responses to environmental changes.
  • Researching advanced methods for carbon capture and utilization, including biological and chemical approaches.
  • Developing new techniques for environmental remediation and restoration, including bioremediation and genetic engineering.

2. Applied Research and Technology Development:

• Advanced Energy Technologies:
  • Developing highly efficient and cost-effective solar cells based on perovskites or other novel materials.
  • Designing advanced fusion reactor concepts and developing the necessary materials and technologies.
  • Creating intelligent energy grids that can optimize energy distribution and storage on a global scale.
• Environmental Technologies:
  • Developing large-scale atmospheric carbon capture systems that can efficiently remove CO2 from the air.
  • Creating advanced recycling technologies that can break down complex materials at the molecular level.  
  • Developing precision agriculture technologies that can minimize resource use and maximize yields.  
• Bio-Integrated Technologies:
  • Engineering microorganisms to produce biofuels, bioplastics, and other valuable products.  
  • Developing bio-integrated sensors and actuators for environmental monitoring and control.  
  • Creating bio-inspired materials and structures for various applications.
• Computing and AI:
  • Developing quantum computers that can solve complex problems related to materials science, chemistry, and other fields relevant to sustainability.  
  • Creating energy-efficient computing architectures and algorithms to reduce the environmental footprint of computing.  
  • Developing AI systems that can optimize energy use, resource management, and other aspects of sustainability.  

3. Cross-Cutting Research Areas:

• Systems Thinking and Integration: Researching how to integrate different sustainable technologies into holistic systems, such as smart cities and circular economy models.
• Social and Behavioral Sciences: Understanding how people interact with technology and how to promote the adoption of sustainable practices.
• Policy and Governance Research: Developing policies and governance frameworks that can support the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.

Key Considerations for R&D:

• Long-Term Vision: R&D efforts should be guided by a long-term vision of sustainability, anticipating future challenges and opportunities.  
• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and policymakers is crucial for success.  
• Global Collaboration: International cooperation is essential for sharing knowledge, resources, and technologies.  
• Ethical Considerations: R&D should be conducted with careful consideration of ethical implications and potential unintended consequences.

By investing in these key R&D areas today, we can lay the foundation for the sustainable technologies of 2120 and create a more environmentally responsible and prosperous future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wuebbles DJ, Fahey DW, Hibbard KA, DeAngelo B, Doherty S, Hayhoe K, Horton R, Kossin JP, Taylor PC, Waple AM, Weaver CP (2017). “Executive Summary”. In Wuebbles DJ, Fahey DW, Hibbard KA, Dokken DJ, Stewart BC, Maycock TK (eds.). Climate Science Special Report – Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4). Vol. I. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program. pp. 12–34. doi:10.7930/J0DJ5CTG.
2. ^ Sahney, Benton & Ferry (2010); Hawksworth & Bull (2008); Steffen et al. (2006) Chapin, Matson & Vitousek (2011)
3. ^ Stockton, Nick (22 April 2015). “The Biggest Threat to the Earth? We Have Too Many Kids”. Wired.com. Archived from the original on 18 December 2019. Retrieved 24 November 2017.
4. ^ Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Barnard, Phoebe; Moomaw, William R. (5 November 2019). “World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency”. BioScience. doi:10.1093/biosci/biz088. hdl:1808/30278. Archived from the original on 3 January 2020. Retrieved 8 November 2019. Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per day (figure 1a–b), the world population must be stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced—within a framework that ensures social integrity. There are proven and effective policies that strengthen human rights while lowering fertility rates and lessening the impacts of population growth on GHG emissions and biodiversity loss. These policies make family-planning services available to all people, remove barriers to their access and achieve full gender equity, including primary and secondary education as a global norm for all, especially girls and young women (Bongaarts and O’Neill 2018).
5. ^ Cook, John (13 April 2016). “Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming”. Environmental Research Letters. 11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL….11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002. hdl:1983/34949783-dac1-4ce7-ad95-5dc0798930a6. The consensus that humans are causing recent global warming is shared by 90%–100% of publishing climate scientists according to six independent studies
6. ^ Lenton, Timothy M.; Xu, Chi; Abrams, Jesse F.; Ghadiali, Ashish; Loriani, Sina; Sakschewski, Boris; Zimm, Caroline; Ebi, Kristie L.; Dunn, Robert R.; Svenning, Jens-Christian; Scheffer, Marten (2023). “Quantifying the human cost of global warming”. Nature Sustainability. 6 (10): 1237–1247. Bibcode:2023NatSu…6.1237L. doi:10.1038/s41893-023-01132-6. hdl:10871/132650.
7. ^ “Increased Ocean Acidity”. Epa.gov. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 30 August 2016. Archived from the original on 23 June 2011. Retrieved 23 November 2017. Carbon dioxide is added to the atmosphere whenever people burn fossil fuels. Oceans play an important role in keeping the Earth’s carbon cycle in balance. As the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere rises, the oceans absorb a lot of it. In the ocean, carbon dioxide reacts with seawater to form carbonic acid. This causes the acidity of seawater to increase.
8. ^ Leakey, Richard and Roger Lewin, 1996, The Sixth Extinction : Patterns of Life and the Future of Humankind, Anchor, ISBN 0-385-46809-1
9. ^ Ceballos, Gerardo; Ehrlich, Paul R.; Barnosky, Anthony D.; Garcia, Andrés; Pringle, Robert M.; Palmer, Todd M. (2015). “Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction”. Science Advances. 1 (5): e1400253. Bibcode:2015SciA….1E0253C. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400253. PMC 4640606. PMID 26601195.
10. ^ Pimm, S. L.; Jenkins, C. N.; Abell, R.; Brooks, T. M.; Gittleman, J. L.; Joppa, L. N.; Raven, P. H.; Roberts, C. M.; Sexton, J. O. (30 May 2014). “The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection”. Science. 344 (6187). doi:10.1126/science.1246752. The overarching driver of species extinction is human population growth and increasing per capita consumption.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b Crist, Eileen; Ripple, William J.; Ehrlich, Paul R.; Rees, William E.; Wolf, Christopher (November 2022). “Scientists’ warning on population”. Science of the Total Environment. 845: 157166. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.84557166C. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157166. PMID 35803428.
12. ^ Perkins, Sid (11 July 2017). “The best way to reduce your carbon footprint is one the government isn’t telling you about”. Science. doi:10.1126/science.aan7083.
13. ^ Nordström, Jonas; Shogren, Jason F.; Thunström, Linda (15 April 2020). “Do parents counter-balance the carbon emissions of their children?”. PLOS One. 15 (4): e0231105. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1531105N. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231105. PMC 7159189. PMID 32294098. It is well understood that adding to the population increases CO₂ emissions.
14. ^ Harvey, David (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. p. 173. ISBN 978-0199283279.
15. ^ Rees, William E. (2020). “Ecological economics for humanity’s plague phase” (PDF). Ecological Economics. 169: 106519. Bibcode:2020EcoEc.16906519R. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106519. the neoliberal paradigm contributes significantly to planetary unraveling. Neoliberal thinking treats the economy and the ecosphere as separate independent systems and essentially ignores the latter.
16. ^ Jones, Ellie-Anne; Stafford, Rick (2021). “Neoliberalism and the Environment: Are We Aware of Appropriate Action to Save the Planet and Do We Think We Are Doing Enough?”. Earth. 2 (2): 331–339. Bibcode:2021Earth…2..331J. doi:10.3390/earth2020019.
17. ^ Cafaro, Philip (November 2022). “Reducing Human Numbers and the Size of our Economies is Necessary to Avoid a Mass Extinction and Share Earth Justly with Other Species”. Philosophia. 50 (5): 2263–2282. doi:10.1007/s11406-022-00497-w. Conservation biologists agree that humanity is on the verge of causing a mass extinction and that its primary driver is our immense and rapidly expanding global economy.
18. ^ “New Climate Risk Classification Created to Account for Potential “Existential” Threats”. Scripps Institution of Oceanography. 14 September 2017. Archived from the original on 15 September 2017. Retrieved 24 November 2017. A new study evaluating models of future climate scenarios has led to the creation of the new risk categories “catastrophic” and “unknown” to characterize the range of threats posed by rapid global warming. Researchers propose that unknown risks imply existential threats to the survival of humanity.
19. ^ Torres, Phil (11 April 2016). “Biodiversity loss: An existential risk comparable to climate change”. Thebulletin.org. Taylor & Francis. Archived from the original on 13 April 2016. Retrieved 24 November 2017.
20. ^ Bampton, M. (1999) “Anthropogenic Transformation” Archived 22 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine in Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, D. E. Alexander and R. W. Fairbridge (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, ISBN 0412740508.
21. ^ Crutzen, Paul and Eugene F. Stoermer. “The ‘Anthropocene'” in International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme Newsletter. 41 (May 2000): 17–18
22. ^ Scott, Michon (2014). “Glossary”. NASA Earth Observatory. Archived from the original on 17 September 2008. Retrieved 3 November 2008.
23. ^ Syvitski, Jaia; Waters, Colin N.; Day, John; et al. (2020). “Extraordinary human energy consumption and resultant geological impacts beginning around 1950 CE initiated the proposed Anthropocene Epoch”. Communications Earth & Environment. 1 (32): 32. Bibcode:2020ComEE…1…32S. doi:10.1038/s43247-020-00029-y. hdl:10810/51932.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b Elhacham, Emily; Ben-Uri, Liad; et al. (2020). “Global human-made mass exceeds all living biomass”. Nature. 588 (7838): 442–444. Bibcode:2020Natur.588..442E. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5. PMID 33299177.
25. ^ Trenberth, Kevin E. (2 October 2018). “Climate change caused by human activities is happening and it already has major consequences”. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law. 36 (4): 463–481. Bibcode:2018JENRL..36..463T. doi:10.1080/02646811.2018.1450895.
26. ^ “Graphic: The relentless rise of carbon dioxide”. Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Archived from the original on 31 March 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
27. ^ “Open Data Platform”. Data.footprintnetwork.org. Archived from the original on 8 August 2017. Retrieved 16 November 2018.
28. ^ Diamond, Jared (2 January 2008). “What’s Your Consumption Factor?”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 26 December 2016.
29. ^ Jump up to:^a b Carrington, Damian (21 May 2018). “Humans just 0.01% of all life but have destroyed 83% of wild mammals – study”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 11 September 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2018.
30. ^ Borenstein, Seth (21 May 2018). “Humans account for little next to plants, worms, bugs”. AP News. Archived from the original on 22 May 2018. Retrieved 22 May 2018.
31. ^ Pennisi, Elizabeth (21 May 2018). “Plants outweigh all other life on Earth”. Science. Archived from the original on 23 May 2018. Retrieved 22 May 2018.
32. ^ Best, Steven (2014). The Politics of Total Liberation: Revolution for the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 160. ISBN 978-1137471116. By 2050 the human population will top 9 billion, and world meat consumption will likely double.
33. ^ Jump up to:^a b Devlin, Hannah (19 July 2018). “Rising global meat consumption ‘will devastate environment'”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 9 October 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2018.
34. ^ Jump up to:^a b Roser, Max; Ritchie, Hannah; Ortiz-Ospina, Esteban (9 May 2013). “World Population Growth”. Our World in Data.
35. ^ “Graphic: The relentless rise of carbon dioxide”. Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet.
36. ^ Jump up to:^a b Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Galetti M, Alamgir M, Crist E, Mahmoud MI, Laurance WF (13 November 2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342.
37. ^ Stokstad, Erik (5 May 2019). “Landmark analysis documents the alarming global decline of nature”. Science. AAAS. Retrieved 29 October 2021. Driving these threats are the growing human population, which has doubled since 1970 to 7.6 billion, and consumption. (Per capita of use of materials is up 15% over the past 5 decades.)
38. ^ Weston, Phoebe (13 January 2021). “Top scientists warn of ‘ghastly future of mass extinction’ and climate disruption”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 January 2021. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
39. ^ Bradshaw, Corey J. A.; Ehrlich, Paul R.; Beattie, Andrew; Ceballos, Gerardo; Crist, Eileen; Diamond, Joan; Dirzo, Rodolfo; Ehrlich, Anne H.; Harte, John; Harte, Mary Ellen; Pyke, Graham; Raven, Peter H.; Ripple, William J.; Saltré, Frédérik; Turnbull, Christine; Wackernagel, Mathis; Blumstein, Daniel T. (2021). “Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future”. Frontiers in Conservation Science. 1. doi:10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419.
40. ^ Linkola, Pentti (2011). Can Life Prevail? (2nd Revised ed.). Arktos Media. pp. 120–121. ISBN 978-1907166631.
41. ^ Crist, Eileen; Cafaro, Philip, eds. (2012). Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation. University of Georgia Press. p. 83. ISBN 978-0820343853 – via Google Books.
42. ^ Gerland, P.; Raftery, A. E.; Ev Ikova, H.; Li, N.; Gu, D.; Spoorenberg, T.; Alkema, L.; Fosdick, B. K.; Chunn, J.; Lalic, N.; Bay, G.; Buettner, T.; Heilig, G. K.; Wilmoth, J. (18 September 2014). “World population stabilization unlikely this century”. Science. 346 (6206). AAAS: 234–237. Bibcode:2014Sci…346..234G. doi:10.1126/science.1257469. PMC 4230924. PMID 25301627.
43. ^ Bradshaw, Corey J. A.; Ehrlich, Paul R.; Beattie, Andrew; Ceballos, Gerardo; Crist, Eileen; Diamond, Joan; Dirzo, Rodolfo; Ehrlich, Anne H.; Harte, John; Harte, Mary Ellen; Pyke, Graham; Raven, Peter H.; Ripple, William J.; Saltré, Frédérik; Turnbull, Christine; Wackernagel, Mathis; Blumstein, Daniel T. (2021). “Response: Commentary: Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future”. Frontiers in Conservation Science. 2. doi:10.3389/fcosc.2021.700869. On the contrary, we devoted an entire section to the interacting and inter-dependent components of overpopulation and overconsumption, which are, for instance, also central tenets of the recent Economics of Biodiversity review (Dasgupta, 2021). Therein, the dynamic socio-ecological model shows that mutual causation drives modern socio-ecological systems. Just as it is incorrect to insist that a large global population is the sole underlying cause of biodiversity loss, so too is it naïve and incorrect to claim that high consumption alone is the cause, and so forth.
44. ^ Dasgupta, Partha (2021). “The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review Headline Messages” (PDF). UK Government. p. 3. Retrieved 15 December 2021. Growing human populations have significant implications for our demands on Nature, including for future patterns of global consumption.
45. ^ Carrington, Damian (2 February 2021). “Economics of biodiversity review: what are the recommendations?”. The Guardian. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
46. ^ Piper, Kelsey (20 August 2019). “We’ve worried about overpopulation for centuries. And we’ve always been wrong”. Vox. Retrieved 23 October 2021.
47. ^ Welle, Deutsche (31 August 2020). “What fewer people on the planet would mean for the environment”. Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 23 October 2021.
48. ^ Pearce, Fred (8 March 2010). “The overpopulation myth”. Prospect Magazine.
49. ^ Dirzo, Rodolfo; Ceballos, Gerardo; Ehrlich, Paul R. (2022). “Circling the drain: the extinction crisis and the future of humanity”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 377 (1857). doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0378. PMC 9237743. PMID 35757873. It is clear that only a giant change in human culture can significantly limit the extinction crisis. Humanity must face the need to reduce birth rates further, especially among the overconsuming wealthy and middle classes. In addition, a reduction of wasteful consumption will be necessary, accompanied by a transition away from environmentally malign technological choices such as private automobiles, plastic everything, and treating billionaires to space tourism. Otherwise growthmania will win; the human enterprise will not undergo the needed shrinkage, but will continue to expand, destroying most of biodiversity and further wrecking the life-support systems of humanity until global civilization collapses
50. ^ van der Warf, Hayo; Petit, Jean (December 2002). “Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods”. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 93 (1–3): 131–145. Bibcode:2002AgEE…93..131V. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00354-1.
51. ^ Oppenlander 2013, pp. 120–123.
52. ^ Borenstein, Seth (6 May 2019). “UN report: Humans accelerating extinction of other species”. AP News. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
53. ^ Myers, R. A.; Worm, B. (2003). “Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities”. Nature. 423 (6937): 280–283. Bibcode:2003Natur.423..280M. doi:10.1038/nature01610. PMID 12748640.
54. ^ “The World Counts”. www.theworldcounts.com. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
55. ^ Worm, Boris; Barbier, E. B.; Beaumont, N.; Duffy, J. E.; Folke, C.; Halpern, B. S.; Jackson, J. B. C.; Lotze, H. K.; et al. (3 November 2006). “Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services”. Science. 314 (5800): 787–790. Bibcode:2006Sci…314..787W. doi:10.1126/science.1132294. PMID 17082450.
56. ^ Eilperin, Juliet (2 November 2009). “Seafood Population Depleted by 2048, Study Finds”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 14 September 2018. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
57. ^ Document card | FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2018. ISBN 978-92-5-130562-1. Archived from the original on 13 July 2018. Retrieved 27 December 2018. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
58. ^ “State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018”. Sustainable Fisheries UW. 10 July 2018. Archived from the original on 14 July 2018. Retrieved 27 December 2018.
59. ^ Einhorn, Catrin (27 January 2021). “Shark Populations Are Crashing, With a ‘Very Small Window’ to Avert Disaster”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 31 January 2021. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
60. ^ Pacoureau, Nathan; Rigby, Cassandra L.; Kyne, Peter M.; Sherley, Richard B.; Winker, Henning; Carlson, John K.; Fordham, Sonja V.; Barreto, Rodrigo; Fernando, Daniel; Francis, Malcolm P.; Jabado, Rima W.; Herman, Katelyn B.; Liu, Kwang-Ming; Marshall, Andrea D.; Pollom, Riley A.; Romanov, Evgeny V.; Simpfendorfer, Colin A.; Yin, Jamie S.; Kindsvater, Holly K.; Dulvy, Nicholas K. (28 January 2021). “Half a century of global decline in oceanic sharks and rays”. Nature. 589 (7843): 567–571. Bibcode:2021Natur.589..567P. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03173-9. hdl:10871/124531. PMID 33505035.
61. ^ “Management of Irrigation-Induced Salt-Affected Soils” (PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 September 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2021.
62. ^ van Hoorn, J. W. and J.G. van Alphen. 2006. Salinity control. In: H.P. Ritzema (ed.), Drainage Principles and Applications. Publication 16, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Wageningen, The Netherlands. pp. 533–600.
63. ^ Effectiveness and Social/Environmental Impacts of Irrigation Projects: a Review. In: Annual Report 1988, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 18–34. Download from [1] Archived 7 November 2009 at the Wayback Machine, under nr. 6, or directly as PDF
64. ^ Thakkar, Himanshu (8 November 1999). “Assessment of Irrigation in India“ (PDF). Dams.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 October 2003.
65. ^ Pearce, R. (2006). When the rivers run dry: Water – the defining crisis of the twenty-first century. Beacon Press. ISBN 0807085731.
66. ^ Lal, R. and B. A. Stewart. 1990… Soil degradation. Springer-Verlag, New York.
67. ^ Scherr, Sara J (1999). Soil Degradation: A Threat to Developing-Country Food Security by 2020?. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.42277. ISBN 978-0-89629-631-2.
68. ^ Oldeman, L. R.; Hakkeling, R. T. A.; Sambroek, W. G. (1990). “World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation. An explanatory note. GLASOD, Global Assessment of Soil Degradation. International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen” (PDF). Isric.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 February 2015. Retrieved 3 June 2015.
69. ^ Eswaran, H., R. Lal and P. F. Reich. 2001. Land degradation: an overview. In. Bridges, E.M. et al. (eds.) Responses to Land Degradation. Proc. 2nd. Int. Conf. Land Degradation and Desertification, Khon Kaen, Thailand. Oxford Press, New Delhi, India.
70. ^ Jump up to:^a b “FAOSTAT”. Food and Agriculture Organization. Archived from the original on 11 May 2017. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
71. ^ Jump up to:^a b Montgomery, D. R. (2007). “Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (33): 13268–13272. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10413268M. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611508104. PMC 1948917. PMID 17686990.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b NRCS. 2013. Summary report 2010 national resources inventory. United States Natural Resources Conservation Service. 163 pp.
73. ^ Conacher, Arthur; Conacher, Jeanette (1995). Rural Land Degradation in Australia. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press Australia. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-19-553436-8.
74. ^ Jump up to:^a b Johnson, D.L.; Ambrose, S.H.; Bassett, T.J.; Bowen, M.L.; Crummey, D.E.; Isaacson, J.S.; Johnson, D.N.; Lamb, P.; Saul, M.; Winter-Nelson, A.E. (1997). “Meanings of environmental terms”. Journal of Environmental Quality. 26 (3): 581–589. Bibcode:1997JEnvQ..26..581J. doi:10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600030002x.
75. ^ Eswaran, H.; Lal, R.; Reich, P.F. (2001). “Land degradation: an overview”. Responses to Land Degradation. Proc. 2nd. International Conference on Land Degradation and Desertification. New Delhi, India: Oxford Press. Archived from the original on 20 January 2012. Retrieved 5 February 2012.
76. ^ Sample, Ian (31 August 2007). “Global food crisis looms as climate change and population growth strip fertile land”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 29 April 2016. Retrieved 23 July 2008.
77. ^ Damian Carrington, “Avoiding meat and dairy is ‘single biggest way’ to reduce your impact on Earth “ Archived 6 March 2020 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 31 May 2018 (page visited on 19 August 2018).
78. ^ Damian Carrington, “Humans just 0.01% of all life but have destroyed 83% of wild mammals – study” Archived 11 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 21 May 2018 (page visited on 19 August 2018).
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steinfeld, H. et al. 2006. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Livestock, Environment and Development, FAO, Rome. 391 pp.
80. ^ Oppenlander 2013.
81. ^ Oppenlander 2013, pp. 17–25.
82. ^ Jump up to:^a b Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). Climate change 2013, The physical science basis Archived 24 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Fifth Assessment Report.
83. ^ Dlugokencky, E. J.; Nisbet, E. G.; Fisher, R.; Lowry, D. (2011). “Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 369 (1943): 2058–2072. Bibcode:2011RSPTA.369.2058D. doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0341. PMID 21502176.
84. ^ Boadi, D. (2004). “Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review”. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84 (3): 319–335. doi:10.4141/a03-109.
85. ^ Martin, C. (2010). “Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale”. Animal. 4 (3). et al.: 351–365. Bibcode:2010Anim….4..351M. doi:10.1017/S1751731109990620. PMID 22443940.
86. ^ Eckard, R. J.; et al. (2010). “Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review”. Livestock Science. 130 (1–3): 47–56. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.010.
87. ^ Dalal, R.C.; et al. (2003). “Nitrous oxide emission from Australian agricultural lands and mitigation options: a review”. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 41 (2): 165–195. doi:10.1071/sr02064.
88. ^ Klein, C. A. M.; Ledgard, S. F. (2005). “Nitrous oxide emissions from New Zealand agriculture – key sources and mitigation strategies”. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 72 (1): 77–85. Bibcode:2005NCyAg..72…77D. doi:10.1007/s10705-004-7357-z.
89. ^ Mekonnen, M. M. and Hoekstra, A. Y. (2010). The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products. Vol. 2: appendices. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 48. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education.
90. ^ US EPA. 2000. Profile of the agricultural livestock production industry. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Compliance. EPA/310-R-00-002. 156 pp.
91. ^ US EPA, OECA (19 March 2015). “Agriculture”. US EPA. Archived from the original on 4 August 2015. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
92. ^ Capper, J. L. (2011). “The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007”. J. Anim. Sci. 89 (12): 4249–4261. doi:10.2527/jas.2010-3784. PMID 21803973.
93. ^ “Red meat and poultry production”. US Department of Agriculture. Archived from the original on 10 May 2015.
94. ^ Launchbaugh, K. (ed.) 2006. Targeted Grazing: a natural approach to vegetation management and landscape enhancement. American Sheep Industry. 199 pp.
95. ^ Holechek, Jerry L.; Valdez, Raul; Schemnitz, Sanford D.; Pieper, Rex D.; Davis, Charles A. (1982). “Manipulation of Grazing to Improve or Maintain Wildlife Habitat”. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 10 (3): 204–210. JSTOR 3781006.
96. ^ Manley, J. T.; Schuman, G. E.; Reeder, J. D.; Hart, R. H. (1995). “Rangeland soil carbon and nitrogen responses to grazing”. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 50 (3): 294–298. Archived from the original on 20 March 2016.
97. ^ Franzluebbers, A.J.; Stuedemann, J. A. (2010). “Surface soil changes during twelve years of pasture management in the southern Piedmont USA”. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74 (6): 2131–2141. Bibcode:2010SSASJ..74.2131F. doi:10.2136/sssaj2010.0034.
98. ^ Hance, Jeremy (20 October 2015). “How humans are driving the sixth mass extinction”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 8 April 2019. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
99. ^ Morell, Virginia (11 August 2015). “Meat-eaters may speed worldwide species extinction, study warns”. Science. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
100. ^ Machovina, B.; Feeley, K. J.; Ripple, W. J. (2015). “Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption”. Science of the Total Environment. 536: 419–431. Bibcode:2015ScTEn.536..419M. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.022. PMID 26231772.
101. ^ Jump up to:^a b Watts, Jonathan (6 May 2019). “Human society under urgent threat from loss of Earth’s natural life”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 14 June 2019. Retrieved 18 May 2019.
102. ^ McGrath, Matt (6 May 2019). “Nature crisis: Humans ‘threaten 1m species with extinction'”. BBC. Archived from the original on 30 June 2019. Retrieved 1 July 2019.
103. ^ Bland, Alastair (1 August 2012). “Is the Livestock Industry Destroying the Planet?”. Smithsonian. Archived from the original on 3 March 2018. Retrieved 2 August 2019. The global scope of the livestock issue is huge. A 212-page online report published by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization says 26 percent of the earth’s terrestrial surface is used for livestock grazing.
104. ^ Jump up to:^a b Rosner, Hillary (December 2018). “Palm oil is unavoidable. Can it be sustainable?”. National Geographic. Archived from the original on 14 November 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2021.
105. ^ Butler, Rhett A. (31 March 2021). “Global forest loss increases in 2020”. Mongabay. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. ● Data from “Indicators of Forest Extent / Forest Loss”. World Resources Institute. 4 April 2024. Archived from the original on 27 May 2024. Chart in section titled “Annual rates of global tree cover loss have risen since 2000”.
106. ^ Steffen, Will; Sanderson, Angelina; Tyson, Peter; Jäger, Jill; et al. (2004). “Global Change and the Climate System / A Planet Under Pressure” (PDF). International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP). p. 133. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 March 2017. Fig. 3.67(j): loss of tropical rainforest and woodland, as estimated for tropical Africa, Latin America and South and Southeast Asia.
107. ^ Ritchie, Hannah (4 February 2021). “Deforestation and Forest Loss / Humanity destroyed one third of the world’s forests by expanding agricultural land”. Our World in Data. Our World in Data (OWID). Archived from the original on 7 November 2022. Data: Historical data on forests from Williams (2003) – Deforesting the Earth. Historical data on agriculture from The History Database of Global Environment (HYDE). Modern data from the FAO
108. ^ “Palm Oil”. WWF. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 22 January 2021.
109. ^ Meijaard, Erik (7 December 2020). “The environmental impacts of palm oil in context”. Nature Plants. 6 (12): 1418–1426. Bibcode:2020NatPl…6.1418M. doi:10.1038/s41477-020-00813-w. PMID 33299148.
110. ^ Rival A, Levang P (2014). Palms of controversies: Oil palm and development challenges. CIFOR. pp. 34–37. ISBN 9786021504413.
111. ^ RSPO. “About”. RSPO. Archived from the original on 24 December 2020. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
112. ^ Chertow, M.R. (2001). “The IPAT equation and its variants”. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 4 (4): 13–29. doi:10.1162/10881980052541927.
113. ^ Huesemann, Michael; Huesemann, Joyce (2011). Techno-Fix: Why Technology Won’t Save Us Or the Environment. New Society Publishers. ISBN 978-0-86571-704-6.^{[page needed]}
114. ^ Carrington, Damian (15 April 2021). “Just 3% of world’s ecosystems remain intact, study suggests”. The Guardian. Retrieved 16 April 2021.
115. ^ Plumptre, Andrew J.; Baisero, Daniele; et al. (2021). “Where Might We Find Ecologically Intact Communities?”. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 4. Bibcode:2021FrFGC…4.6635P. doi:10.3389/ffgc.2021.626635. hdl:10261/242175.
116. ^ Fleischer, Evan (2 November 2019). “Report: Just 23% of Earth’s wilderness remains”. Big Think. Archived from the original on 6 March 2019. Retrieved 3 March 2019.
117. ^ Wilson, Maxwell C.; Chen, Xiao-Yong; Corlett, Richard T.; Didham, Raphael K.; Ding, Ping; Holt, Robert D.; Holyoak, Marcel; Hu, Guang; Hughes, Alice C.; Jiang, Lin; Laurance, William F.; Liu, Jiajia; Pimm, Stuart L.; Robinson, Scott K.; Russo, Sabrina E.; Si, Xingfeng; Wilcove, David S.; Wu, Jianguo; Yu, Mingjian (February 2016). “Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: key findings and future challenges”. Landscape Ecology. 31 (2): 219–227. Bibcode:2016LaEco..31..219W. doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0312-3.
118. ^ Datta, S. (2018). The Effects of Habitat Destruction of the Environment. Retrieved from https://sciencing.com/effects-habitat-destruction-environment-8403681.html
119. ^ “Anthropocene: Have humans created a new geological age?”. BBC News. 10 May 2011. Archived from the original on 23 October 2018. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
120. ^ May, R.M. (1988). “How many species are there on earth?” (PDF). Science. 241 (4872): 1441–9. Bibcode:1988Sci…241.1441M. doi:10.1126/science.241.4872.1441. PMID 17790039. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 April 2013. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
121. ^ Sahney, Benton & Ferry 2010.
122. ^ Cafaro, Philip; Hansson, Pernilla; Götmark, Frank (August 2022). “Overpopulation is a major cause of biodiversity loss and smaller human populations are necessary to preserve what is left” (PDF). Biological Conservation. 272. 109646. Bibcode:2022BCons.27209646C. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109646.
123. ^ Crist, Eileen; Mora, Camilo; Engelman, Robert (21 April 2017). “The interaction of human population, food production, and biodiversity protection”. Science. 356 (6335): 260–264. Bibcode:2017Sci…356..260C. doi:10.1126/science.aal2011. PMID 28428391.
124. ^ Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (3107): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753.
125. ^ Pimm, S. L.; Jenkins, C. N.; Abell, R.; Brooks, T. M.; Gittleman, J. L.; Joppa, L. N.; Raven, P. H.; Roberts, C. M.; Sexton, J. O. (30 May 2014). “The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection”. Science. 344 (6187). doi:10.1126/science.1246752. PMID 24876501.
126. ^ Ceballos, Gerardo; Ehrlich, Paul R. (2023). “Mutilation of the tree of life via mass extinction of animal genera”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 120 (39): e2306987120. Bibcode:2023PNAS..12006987C. doi:10.1073/pnas.2306987120. PMC 10523489. PMID 37722053. Current generic extinction rates will likely greatly accelerate in the next few decades due to drivers accompanying the growth and consumption of the human enterprise such as habitat destruction, illegal trade, and climate disruption.
127. ^ Cowie, Robert H.; Bouchet, Philippe; Fontaine, Benoît (2022). “The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation?”. Biological Reviews. 97 (2): 640–663. doi:10.1111/brv.12816. PMC 9786292. PMID 35014169.
128. ^ Sankaran, Vishwam (17 January 2022). “Study confirms sixth mass extinction is currently underway, caused by humans”. The Independent. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
129. ^ Ceballos, Gerardo; Ehrlich, Paul R.; Raven, Peter H. (1 June 2020). “Vertebrates on the brink as indicators of biological annihilation and the sixth mass extinction”. PNAS. 117 (24): 13596–13602. Bibcode:2020PNAS..11713596C. doi:10.1073/pnas.1922686117. PMC 7306750. PMID 32482862.
130. ^ Vidal, John (15 March 2019). “The Rapid Decline Of The Natural World Is A Crisis Even Bigger Than Climate Change”. The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 3 October 2019. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
131. ^ Greenfield, Patrick (9 September 2020). “Humans exploiting and destroying nature on unprecedented scale – report”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 9 September 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
132. ^ Cockburn, Harry; Boyle, Louise (9 September 2020). “Natural world being destroyed at rate ‘never seen before’, WWF warns as report reveals catastrophic decline of global wildlife”. The Independent. Archived from the original on 10 September 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
133. ^ Ceballos, G.; Ehrlich, A. H.; Ehrlich, P. R. (2015). The Annihilation of Nature: Human Extinction of Birds and Mammals. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 135 ISBN 1421417189 – via Open Edition.
134. ^ Plumer, Brad (6 May 2019). “Humans Are Speeding Extinction and Altering the Natural World at an ‘Unprecedented’ Pace”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 June 2019. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
135. ^ Staff (6 May 2019). “Media Release: Nature’s Dangerous Decline ‘Unprecedented’; Species Extinction Rates ‘Accelerating'”. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Archived from the original on 14 June 2019. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
136. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Decreasing biodiversity affects productivity of remaining plants”. Science Direct. 20 April 2015. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Source: University of Alaska Fairbanks
137. ^ McKim S, Halpin C (5 June 2019). “‘Plant blindness’ is obscuring the extinction crisis for non-animal species”. The Conversation.
138. ^ Dirzo, Rodolfo; Young, Hillary S.; Galetti, Mauro; Ceballos, Gerardo; Isaac, Nick J. B.; Collen, Ben (25 July 2014). “Defaunation in the Anthropocene”. Science. 345 (6195): 401–406. Bibcode:2014Sci…345..401D. doi:10.1126/science.1251817. PMID 25061202.
139. ^ Simberloff, Daniel (10 October 2013). “How Are Species Introductions Regulated?”. Invasive Species. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/wentk/9780199922017.003.0008. ISBN 978-0-19-992201-7.
140. ^ “Cats kill more than 1.5 billion native animals per year”. ANU. 9 July 2019. Archived from the original on 1 May 2021. Retrieved 1 May 2021.
141. ^ “Feral Cats”. Florida Fish And Wildlife Conservation Commission. Archived from the original on 7 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
142. ^ “Animals and Rabies | Rabies | CDC”. Centers for Disease Control. 25 September 2020. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
143. ^ Janos, Adam. “How Burmese Pythons Took Over the Florida Everglades”. HISTORY. Retrieved 12 May 2021.
144. ^ “How have invasive pythons impacted Florida ecosystems?”. USGS. Retrieved 12 May 2021.
145. ^ “Wild boar hybrids are raising hell on the Canadian prairies”. The Economist. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
146. ^ “Coral reefs around the world”. Guardian.com. 2 September 2009. Retrieved 12 June 2010.
147. ^ US EPA, OW (30 January 2017). “Threats to Coral Reefs”. www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2 June 2024.
148. ^ Nace, Trevor (24 February 2020). “Nearly All Coral Reefs Will Disappear Over The Next 20 Years, Scientists Say”. Forbes. Retrieved 15 July 2021.
149. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilkinson, Clive (2008) Status of Coral Reefs of the World: Executive Summary Archived 2013-12-19 at the Wayback Machine. Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network.
150. ^ “Reefs at Risk Revisited” (PDF). World Resources Institute. February 2011. Retrieved 16 March 2012.
151. ^ Kleypas, Joan A.; Feely, Richard A.; Fabry, Victoria J.; Langdon, Chris; Sabine, Christopher L.; Robbins, Lisa L. (June 2006). “Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Coral Reefs and Other Marine Calcifiers: A Guide for Future Research” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
152. ^ Von Sperling, Marcos (2007). “Wastewater Characteristics, Treatment and Disposal”. Water Intelligence Online. Biological Wastewater Treatment. 6. IWA Publishing. doi:10.2166/9781780402086. ISBN 978-1-78040-208-6.
153. ^ Eckenfelder Jr WW (2000). Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/0471238961.1615121205031105.a01. ISBN 978-0-471-48494-3.
154. ^ “Water Pollution”. Environmental Health Education Program. Cambridge, MA: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 23 July 2013. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
155. ^ Schaffner, Monika; Bader, Hans-Peter; Scheidegger, Ruth (15 August 2009). “Modeling the contribution of point sources and non-point sources to Thachin River water pollution”. Science of the Total Environment. 407 (17): 4902–4915. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.007. ISSN 0048-9697.
156. ^ Moss B (February 2008). “Water pollution by agriculture”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 363 (1491): 659–666. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2176. PMC 2610176. PMID 17666391.
157. ^ “The Causes of Climate Change”. climate.nasa.gov. NASA. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019.
158. ^ “Climate Science Special Report / Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4), Volume I”. U.S. Global Change Research Program. Archived from the original on 14 December 2019.
159. ^ IPCC (2019). Pörtner, H.-O.; Roberts, D.C.; Masson-Delmotte, V.; Zhai, P.; et al. (eds.). IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (PDF). IPCC.
160. ^ “Extreme Weather and Climate Change”. NASA.gov. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. September 2023. Archived from the original on 26 October 2023.
161. ^ “The Study of Earth as an Integrated System”. nasa.gov. NASA. 2016. Archived from the original on 2 November 2016.
162. ^ Oppenlander 2013, p. 31.
163. ^ CounterAct; Women’s Climate Justice Collective (4 May 2020). “Climate Justice and Feminism Resource Collection”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
164. ^ Lindsey, Rebecca; Dahlman, Luann (28 June 2022). “Climate Change: Global Temperature”. climate.gov. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Archived from the original on 17 September 2022.
165. ^ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), ed. (2022), “Summary for Policymakers”, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–36, doi:10.1017/9781009157964.001, ISBN 978-1-009-15796-4, retrieved 24 April 2023
166. ^ Doney, Scott C.; Busch, D. Shallin; Cooley, Sarah R.; Kroeker, Kristy J. (17 October 2020). “The Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Marine Ecosystems and Reliant Human Communities”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 45 (1): 83–112. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083019. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 225741986.
167. ^ EPA (19 January 2017). “Climate Impacts on Ecosystems”. Archived from the original on 27 January 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2019. Mountain and arctic ecosystems and species are particularly sensitive to climate change… As ocean temperatures warm and the acidity of the ocean increases, bleaching and coral die-offs are likely to become more frequent.
168. ^ Pecl, Gretta T.; Araújo, Miguel B.; Bell, Johann D.; Blanchard, Julia; Bonebrake, Timothy C.; Chen, I-Ching; Clark, Timothy D.; Colwell, Robert K.; Danielsen, Finn; Evengård, Birgitta; Falconi, Lorena; Ferrier, Simon; Frusher, Stewart; Garcia, Raquel A.; Griffis, Roger B.; Hobday, Alistair J.; Janion-Scheepers, Charlene; Jarzyna, Marta A.; Jennings, Sarah; Lenoir, Jonathan; Linnetved, Hlif I.; Martin, Victoria Y.; McCormack, Phillipa C.; McDonald, Jan; Mitchell, Nicola J.; Mustonen, Tero; Pandolfi, John M.; Pettorelli, Nathalie; Popova, Ekaterina; Robinson, Sharon A.; Scheffers, Brett R.; Shaw, Justine D.; Sorte, Cascade J. B.; Strugnell, Jan M.; Sunday, Jennifer M.; Tuanmu, Mao-Ning; Vergés, Adriana; Villanueva, Cecilia; Wernberg, Thomas; Wapstra, Erik; Williams, Stephen E. (31 March 2017). “Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being”. Science. 355 (6332): eaai9214. doi:10.1126/science.aai9214. hdl:10019.1/120851. PMID 28360268. S2CID 206653576.
169. ^ IPCC, 2019: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.- O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, J. Malley, (eds.)]. doi:10.1017/9781009157988.001
170. ^ Parmesan, Camille; Morecroft, Mike; Trisurat, Yongyut; et al. “Chapter 2: Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecosystems and their Services” (PDF). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. The Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
171. ^ “Acid Rain, explained”. National Geographic. 28 February 2019. Archived from the original on 19 January 2017.
172. ^ Jones N., (2016). How Growing Sea Plants Can Help Slow Ocean Acidification. Retrieved from https://e360.yale.edu/features/kelp_seagrass_slow_ocean_acidification_netarts
173. ^ “Twenty Questions and Answers About the Ozone Layer” (PDF). Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010. World Meteorological Organization. 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 March 2013. Retrieved 13 March 2015.
174. ^ Gruijl, Frank de; Leun, Jan (3 October 2000). “Environment and health: 3. Ozone depletion and ultraviolet radiation”. CMAJ. 163 (7): 851–855. PMC 80511. PMID 11033716 – via www.cmaj.ca.
175. ^ Andino, Jean M. (21 October 1999). “Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are heavier than air, so how do scientists suppose that these chemicals reach the altitude of the ozone layer to adversely affect it ?”. Scientific American. 264: 68.
176. ^ “Part III. The Science of the Ozone Hole”. Retrieved 5 March 2007.
177. ^ “Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation”. www.cancer.org. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
178. ^ “The Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer”. United States Department of State. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
179. ^ Banerjee, Antara; et al. (2020). “A pause in Southern Hemisphere circulation trends due to the Montreal Protocol”. Vol. 579. Nature. pp. 544–548. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2120-4.
180. ^ “The Antarctic Ozone Hole Will Recover”. NASA. 4 June 2015. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
181. ^ Bowden, John (21 October 2019). “Ozone hole shrinks to lowest size since 1982, unrelated to climate change: NASA”. The Hill. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
182. ^ Ansari, Talal (23 October 2019). “Ozone Hole Above Antarctica Shrinks to Smallest Size on Record”. The Wall Street Journal – via www.wsj.com.
183. ^ “The Week”. No. 1418. Future PLC. 14 January 2023. p. 2.
184. ^ Laboratory (CSL), NOAA Chemical Sciences. “NOAA CSL: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022”. www.csl.noaa.gov. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
185. ^ “The Ozone Hole – The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer”. Theozonehole.com. 16 September 1987. Archived from the original on 12 September 2012. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
186. ^ “Background for International Day for the Preservation of the Ozone Layer – 16 September”. www.un.org. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
187. ^ John T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson. 2001. IPCC Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I in the Third Assessment Report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press
188. ^ Jump up to:^a b Schlesinger, W. H. 1997. Biogeochemistry : An analysis of global change, San Diego, CA.
189. ^ Galloway, J. N.; Aber, J. D.; Erisman, J. N. W.; Seitzinger, S. P.; Howarth, R. W.; Cowling, E. B.; Cosby, B. J. (2003). “The Nitrogen Cascade”. BioScience. 53 (4): 341. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:TNC]2.0.CO;2.
190. ^ Houdijk, A. L. F. M.; Verbeek, P. J. M.; Dijk, H. F. G.; Roelofs, J. G. M. (1993). “Distribution and decline of endangered herbaceous heathland species in relation to the chemical composition of the soil”. Plant and Soil. 148 (1): 137–143. Bibcode:1993PlSoi.148..137H. doi:10.1007/BF02185393.
191. ^ Commoner, B. (1971). The closing cycle – Nature, man, and technology, Alfred A. Knopf.
192. ^ Faber, M., Niemes, N. and Stephan, G. (2012). Entropy, environment, and resources, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, ISBN 3642970494.
193. ^ Kümmel, R. (1989). “Energy as a factor of production and entropy as a pollution indicator in macroeconomic modeling”. Ecological Economics. 1 (2): 161–180. Bibcode:1989EcoEc…1..161K. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(89)90003-7.
194. ^ Ruth, M. (1993). Integrating economics, ecology, and thermodynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 0792323777.
195. ^ Huesemann, Michael H.; Huesemann, Joyce A. (2011). “1: The inherent unpredictability and unavoidability of unintended consequences”. Technofix: Why Technology Won’t Save Us or the Environment. New Society Publishers. ISBN 978-0865717046. Archived from the original on 10 April 2020.
196. ^ Logging of forests and debris dumping Archived 1 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine. Ngm.nationalgeographic.com (17 October 2002). Retrieved on 11 May 2012.
197. ^ Chibuike, G. U., & Obiora, S. C. (2014). Heavy metal polluted soils: effect on plants and bioremediation methods. Applied and environmental soil science, 2014.
198. ^ Poisoning by mines Archived 26 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine. Ngm.nationalgeographic.com (17 October 2002). Retrieved on 11 May 2012.
199. ^ Jiwan, S., & Ajah, K. S. (2011). Effects of heavy metals on soil, plants, human health and aquatic life. International Journal of Research in Chemistry and Environment, 1(2), 15–21.
200. ^ Kay, J. (2002). “On Complexity Theory, Exergy and Industrial Ecology: Some Implications for Construction Ecology”, pp. 72–107 in: Kibert C., Sendzimir J., Guy, B. (eds.) Construction Ecology: Nature as the Basis for Green Buildings, London: Spon Press, ISBN 0203166140.
201. ^ Baksh, B.; Fiksel, J. (2003). “The Quest for Sustainability: Challenges for Process Systems Engineering” (PDF). AIChE Journal. 49 (6): 1350–1358. Bibcode:2003AIChE..49.1350B. doi:10.1002/aic.690490602. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
202. ^ USDA-USDoE. (1998). Life cycle inventory of biodiesel and petroleum diesel in an urban bus. NREL/SR-580-24089 UC Category 1503.
203. ^ Huo, H.; Wang, M.; Bloyd, C.; Putsche, V. (2009). “Life-cycle assessment of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of soybean-derived biodiesel and renewable fuels”. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (3): 750–756. Bibcode:2009EnST…43..750H. doi:10.1021/es8011436. PMID 19245012.
204. ^ Atadashi, I. M; Arou, M. K.; Aziz, A. A. (2010). “High quality biodiesel and its diesel engine application: a review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 14 (7): 1999–2008. Bibcode:2010RSERv..14.1999A. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.020.
205. ^ “coal power: air pollution”. Ucsusa.org. Archived from the original on 15 January 2008. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
206. ^ Fitzpatrick, Luke (15 March 2018). “Surface Coal Mining and Human Health: Evidence from West Virginia”. Southern Economic Journal. 84 (4): 1109–1128. doi:10.1002/soej.12260.
207. ^ Munawer, Muhammad (2018). “Human health and environmental impacts of coal combustion and post-combustion wastes”. Journal of Sustainable Mining. 17 (2): 87–96. Bibcode:2018JSMin..17…87M. doi:10.1016/j.jsm.2017.12.007.
208. ^ Moeller, Richard (13 March 2011). “I understand that, among mining’s other problems, like providing climate-warming coal and endangering miners’ lives, it is also a serious water polluter. Can you enlighten?”. EarthTalk: Questions and Answers About Our Environment. A Weekly Column – via Earth Action Network, Inc.
209. ^ Chabukdhara, Mayuri (25 May 2016). “Coal mining in northeast India: an overview of environmental issues and treatment approaches”. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology. 3 (2): 87–96. Bibcode:2016IJCST…3…87C. doi:10.1007/s40789-016-0126-1.
210. ^ “environmental impact of energy — European Environment Agency”. www.eea.europa.eu. Retrieved 28 October 2021.
211. ^ “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
212. ^ “Coal – Fuels & Technologies”. IEA. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
213. ^ “Coal Was Meant to Be History. Instead, Its Use Is Soaring”. Bloomberg.com. 4 November 2022. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
214. ^ Smith, G. (2012). Nuclear roulette: The truth about the most dangerous energy source on earth. Chelsea Green Publishing. ISBN 978-1603584340.
215. ^ Bartis, Jim (26 October 2006). Unconventional Liquid Fuels Overview (PDF). World Oil Conference. Boston: Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 28 June 2007.
216. ^ Buller, Erin (11 July 2008). “Capturing the wind”. Uinta County Herald. Archived from the original on 31 July 2008. Retrieved 4 December 2008.”The animals don’t care at all. We find cows and antelope napping in the shade of the turbines.” – Mike Cadieux, site manager, Wyoming Wind Farm
217. ^ Jump up to:^a b Dunnett, Sebastian; Holland, Robert A.; Taylor, Gail; Eigenbrod, Felix (8 February 2022). “Predicted wind and solar energy expansion has minimal overlap with multiple conservation priorities across global regions”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (6). Bibcode:2022PNAS..11904764D. doi:10.1073/pnas.2104764119. PMC 8832964. PMID 35101973.
218. ^ “How Wind Energy Can Help Us Breathe Easier”. Energy.gov. Retrieved 27 September 2022.
219. ^ Guezuraga, Begoña; Zauner, Rudolf; Pölz, Werner (January 2012). “Life cycle assessment of two different 2 MW class wind turbines”. Renewable Energy. 37 (1): 37. Bibcode:2012REne…37…37G. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.008.
220. ^ Thomas Kirchhoff (2014): Energiewende und Landschaftsästhetik. Versachlichung ästhetischer Bewertungen von Energieanlagen durch Bezugnahme auf drei intersubjektive Landschaftsideale Archived 18 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine, in: Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 46 (1): 10–16.
221. ^ “What are the pros and cons of onshore wind energy?”. Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment. January 2018. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
222. ^ “What are the pros and cons of onshore wind energy?”. Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment. Archived from the original on 22 June 2019. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
223. ^ Jump up to:^a b Nathan F. Jones, Liba Pejchar, Joseph M. Kiesecker. “The Energy Footprint: How Oil, Natural Gas, and Wind Energy Affect Land for Biodiversity and the Flow of Ecosystem Services“. BioScience, Volume 65, Issue 3, March 2015. pp. 290–301.
224. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Why Australia needs wind power” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
225. ^ “Wind energy Frequently Asked Questions”. British Wind Energy Association. Archived from the original on 19 April 2006. Retrieved 21 April 2006.
226. ^ Loren D. Knopper, Christopher A. Ollson, Lindsay C. McCallum, Melissa L. Whitfield Aslund, Robert G. Berger, Kathleen Souweine, and Mary McDaniel, Wind Turbines and Human Health, [Frontiers of Public Health]. June 19, 2014; 2: 63.
227. ^ “Wind energy Frequently Asked Questions”. British Wind Energy Association. Archived from the original on 19 April 2006. Retrieved 21 April 2006.
228. ^ Szarka, Joseph. Wind Power in Europe: Politics, Business and Society. Springer, 2007. p. 176.
229. ^ Dodd, Eimear (27 March 2021). “Permission to build five turbine wind farm at Kilranelagh refused”. Irish Independent. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
230. ^ Kula, Adam (9 April 2021). “Department defends 500ft windfarm in protected Area of Outstanding Beauty”. The News Letter. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
231. ^ “Building wind farms ‘could destroy Welsh landscape'”. BBC News. 4 November 2019. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
232. ^ Gordon, David. Wind farms and tourism in Scotland Archived 21 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Mountaineering Council of Scotland. November 2017. p. 3.
233. ^ Dunnett, Sebastian; Holland, Robert A.; Taylor, Gail; Eigenbrod, Felix (8 February 2022). “Predicted wind and solar energy expansion has minimal overlap with multiple conservation priorities across global regions”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (6). Bibcode:2022PNAS..11904764D. doi:10.1073/pnas.2104764119. PMC 8832964. PMID 35101973.
234. ^ Parisé, J.; Walker, T. R. (2017). “Industrial wind turbine post-construction bird and bat monitoring: A policy framework for Canada”. Journal of Environmental Management. 201: 252–259. Bibcode:2017JEnvM.201..252P. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.052. PMID 28672197.
235. ^ Hosansky, David (1 April 2011). “Wind Power: Is wind energy good for the environment?”. CQ Researcher.
236. ^ Katovich, Erik (9 January 2024). “Quantifying the Effects of Energy Infrastructure on Bird Populations and Biodiversity”. Environmental Science & Technology. 58 (1): 323–332. Bibcode:2024EnST…58..323K. doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c03899. PMID 38153963.
237. ^ “Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas drilling”. The Economist. Retrieved 16 January 2024.
238. ^ Parisé, J.; Walker, T. R. (2017). “Industrial wind turbine post-construction bird and bat monitoring: A policy framework for Canada”. Journal of Environmental Management. 201: 252–259. Bibcode:2017JEnvM.201..252P. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.052. PMID 28672197.
239. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sneve, Joe (4 September 2019). “Sioux Falls landfill tightens rules after Iowa dumps dozens of wind turbine blades”. Argus Leader. Archived from the original on 24 November 2021. Retrieved 5 September 2019.
240. ^ Kelley, Rick (18 February 2018). “Retiring worn-out wind turbines could cost billions that nobody has”. Valley Morning Star. Archived from the original on 5 September 2019. Retrieved 5 September 2019. The blades are composite, those are not recyclable, those can’t be sold,” Linowes said. “The landfills are going to be filled with blades in a matter of no time.
241. ^ Jump up to:^a b “These bike shelters are made from wind turbines”. World Economic Forum. 19 October 2021. Retrieved 2 April 2022.
242. ^ How Loud Is A Wind Turbine? Archived 15 December 2014 at the Wayback Machine. GE Reports (2 August 2014). Retrieved on 20 July 2016.
243. ^ Gipe, Paul (1995). Wind Energy Comes of Age. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 376–. ISBN 978-0-471-10924-2.
244. ^ Gohlke, J. M.; et al. (2008). “Health, Economy, and Environment: Sustainable Energy Choices for a Nation”. Environmental Health Perspectives. 116 (6): A236 – A237. doi:10.1289/ehp.11602. PMC 2430245. PMID 18560493.
245. ^ Professor Simon Chapman. “Summary of main conclusions reached in 25 reviews of the research literature on wind farms and health Archived 22 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine” Sydney University School of Public Health, April 2015.
246. ^ Hamilton, Tyler (15 December 2009). “Wind Gets Clean Bill of Health”. Toronto Star. Toronto. pp. B1 – B2. Archived from the original on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2009.
247. ^ Colby, W. David et al. (December 2009) “Wind Turbine Sound and Health Effects: An Expert Panel Review” Archived 18 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Canadian Wind Energy Association.
248. ^ “The Underwater Sound from Offshore Wind Farms” (PDF).
249. ^ Tougaard, Jakob; Hermannsen, Line; Madsen, Peter T. (1 November 2020). “How loud is the underwater noise from operating offshore wind turbines?”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 148 (5): 2885–2893. Bibcode:2020ASAJ..148.2885T. doi:10.1121/10.0002453. PMID 33261376.
250. ^ Quanz, Meaghan E.; Walker, Tony R.; Oakes, Ken; Willis, Rob (April 2021). “Contaminant characterization in wetland media surrounding a pulp mill industrial effluent treatment facility”. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 29 (2): 209–229. doi:10.1007/s11273-020-09779-0. S2CID 234124476.
251. ^ Hoffman, Emma; Alimohammadi, Masi; Lyons, James; Davis, Emily; Walker, Tony R.; Lake, Craig B. (September 2019). “Characterization and spatial distribution of organic-contaminated sediment derived from historical industrial effluents”. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 191 (9): 590. doi:10.1007/s10661-019-7763-y. PMID 31444645. S2CID 201283047.
252. ^ Hoffman, Emma; Bernier, Meagan; Blotnicky, Brenden; Golden, Peter G.; Janes, Jeffrey; Kader, Allison; Kovacs-Da Costa, Rachel; Pettipas, Shauna; Vermeulen, Sarah; Walker, Tony R. (December 2015). “Assessment of public perception and environmental compliance at a pulp and paper facility: a Canadian case study”. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 187 (12): 766. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4985-5. PMID 26590146. S2CID 3432051.
253. ^ “Clean Air – Clean Water – Pulp Info Centre”. Reach for Unbleached Foundation, Comox, BC. Archived from the original on 1 January 2006. Retrieved 7 May 2008.
254. ^ “Paper Calculator”. Environmental Paper Network Paper Calculator. 30 July 2019.
255. ^ “EPAT – Welcome”. Epat.org. Retrieved 16 August 2018.
256. ^ Paper Profile, 2008. Manual for an environmental product declaration for the pulp and paper industry – Paper Profile, Valid from January 2008
257. ^ EPA,OEI,OIAA,TRIPD, US (16 July 2015). “TRI National Analysis – US EPA”. US EPA. Retrieved 16 August 2018.
258. ^ “Interactive environmental indicators maps”. 16 September 2010. Retrieved 31 July 2019.
259. ^ Dionne, Joelle; Walker, Tony R. (1 December 2021). “Air pollution impacts from a pulp and paper mill facility located in adjacent communities, Edmundston, New Brunswick, Canada and Madawaska, Maine, United States”. Environmental Challenges. 5: 100245. Bibcode:2021EnvCh…500245D. doi:10.1016/j.envc.2021.100245.
260. ^ Sutter, John D. (12 December 2016). “How to stop the sixth mass extinction”. CNN. Archived from the original on 13 December 2016. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
261. ^ Laville, Sandra (9 December 2020). “Human-made materials now outweigh Earth’s entire biomass – study”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 10 December 2020.
262. ^ Miller GT (2004), Sustaining the Earth, 6th edition. Thompson Learning, Inc. Pacific Grove, California. Chapter 9, pp. 211–216, ISBN 0534400876.
263. ^ Part 1. Conditions and provisions for developing a national strategy for biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity Conservation National Strategy and Action Plan of Republic of Uzbekistan. Prepared by the National Biodiversity Strategy Project Steering Committee with the Financial Assistance of The Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and Technical Assistance of United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, 1998). Retrieved on 17 September 2007.
264. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kellogg RL, Nehring R, Grube A, Goss DW, and Plotkin S (February 2000), Environmental indicators of pesticide leaching and runoff from farm fields. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. Retrieved on 3 October 2007.
265. ^ Reynolds, JD (1997), International pesticide trade: Is there any hope for the effective regulation of controlled substances? Archived 27 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine Florida State University Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, Volume 131. Retrieved on 16 October 2007.
266. ^ “Origins and Fate of PPCPs in the Environment” (PDF). Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products. EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory. March 2006.
267. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wang J, Wang S (November 2016). “Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) from wastewater: A review”. Journal of Environmental Management. 182: 620–640. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.049. PMID 27552641.
268. ^ Shinn H (2019). “The Effects of Ultraviolet Filters and Sunscreen on Corals and Aquatic Ecosystems: Bibliography”. NOAA Central Library. doi:10.25923/hhrp-xq11.
269. ^ Downs CA, Kramarsky-Winter E, Segal R, Fauth J, Knutson S, Bronstein O, et al. (February 2016). “Toxicopathological Effects of the Sunscreen UV Filter, Oxybenzone (Benzophenone-3), on Coral Planulae and Cultured Primary Cells and Its Environmental Contamination in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands”. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 70 (2): 265–88. doi:10.1007/s00244-015-0227-7. PMID 26487337. S2CID 4243494.
270. ^ Downs CA, Kramarsky-Winter E, Fauth JE, Segal R, Bronstein O, Jeger R, et al. (March 2014). “Toxicological effects of the sunscreen UV filter, benzophenone-2, on planulae and in vitro cells of the coral, Stylophora pistillata”. Ecotoxicology. 23 (2): 175–91. doi:10.1007/s10646-013-1161-y. PMID 24352829. S2CID 1505199.
271. ^ Niemuth NJ, Klaper RD (September 2015). “Emerging wastewater contaminant metformin causes intersex and reduced fecundity in fish”. Chemosphere. 135: 38–45. Bibcode:2015Chmsp.135…38N. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.060. PMID 25898388.
272. ^ Larsson DG, Adolfsson-Erici M, Parkkonen J, Pettersson M, Berg AH, Olsson PE, Förlin L (1 April 1999). “Ethinyloestradiol — an undesired fish contraceptive?”. Aquatic Toxicology. 45 (2): 91–97. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(98)00112-X. ISSN 0166-445X.
273. ^ “Pharmaceuticals in rivers threaten world health – study”. BBC News. 15 February 2022. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
274. ^ Wilkinson, John L.; Boxall, Alistair B. A.; et al. (14 February 2022). “Pharmaceutical pollution of the world’s rivers”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (8). Bibcode:2022PNAS..11913947W. doi:10.1073/pnas.2113947119. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 8872717. PMID 35165193.
275. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Fuglestvedt, J.; Berntsen, T.; Myhre, G.; Rypdal, K.; Skeie, R. B. (2008). “Climate forcing from the transport sectors”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (2): 454–458. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105..454F. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702958104. PMC 2206557. PMID 18180450.
276. ^ Worldwatch Institute (16 January 2008). “Analysis: Nano Hypocrisy?”. Archived from the original on 13 October 2013. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
277. ^ Carbon Pathways Analysis – Informing Development of a Carbon Reduction Strategy for the Transport Sector | Claverton Group Archived 18 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine. Claverton-energy.com (17 February 2009). Retrieved on 11 May 2012.
278. ^ Environment Canada. “Transportation”. Archived from the original on 13 July 2007. Retrieved 30 July 2008.
279. ^ Pereira, G.; et al. (2010). “Residential exposure to traffic emissions and adverse pregnancy outcomes”. S.A.P.I.EN.S. 3 (1). Archived from the original on 8 March 2014. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
280. ^ International Civil Aviation Organization, Air Transport Bureau (ATB). “Aircraft Engine Emissions”. Archived from the original on 1 June 2002. Retrieved 19 March 2008.
281. ^ “What is the impact of flying?”. Enviro.aero. Archived from the original on 30 June 2007. Retrieved 19 March 2008.
282. ^ Travis, David J.; Carleton, Andrew M.; Lauritsen, Ryan G. (August 2002). “Contrails reduce daily temperature range”. Nature. 418 (6898): 601. doi:10.1038/418601a. PMID 12167846.
283. ^ “Climate change: Commission proposes bringing air transport into EU Emissions Trading Scheme” (Press release). EU press release. 20 December 2006. Archived from the original on 19 May 2011. Retrieved 2 January 2008.
284. ^ Jump up to:^a b Gössling S, Ceron JP, Dubois G, Hall CM, Gössling S, Upham P, Earthscan L (2009). “Hypermobile travellers” Archived 15 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine, pp. 131–151 (Chapter 6) in: Climate Change and Aviation: Issues, Challenges and Solutions, London, ISBN 1844076202.
285. ^ Including Aviation into the EU ETS: Impact on EU allowance prices. ICF Consulting for DEFRA, February 2006.
286. ^ Vidal, John (3 March 2007) CO2 output from shipping twice as much as airlines Archived 25 January 2021 at the Wayback Machine. The Guardian. Retrieved on 11 May 2012.
287. ^ Greenhouse gas emissions Archived 7 July 2009 at the Portuguese Web Archive. Imo.org. Retrieved on 11 May 2012.
288. ^ SustainableShipping: (S) News – IMO targets greenhouse gas emissions (17 Jun 2008) – The forum dedicated to marine transportation and the environment
289. ^ Jump up to:^a b Jorgenson, Andrew K.; Clark, Brett (1 May 2016). “The temporal stability and developmental differences in the environmental impacts of militarism: the treadmill of destruction and consumption-based carbon emissions”. Sustainability Science. 11 (3): 505–514. Bibcode:2016SuSc…11..505J. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0309-5.
290. ^ “The US Department of Defense Is One of the World’s Biggest Polluters”. Newsweek.com. 17 July 2014. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018.
291. ^ Bradford, John Hamilton; Stoner, Alexander M. (11 August 2017). “The Treadmill of Destruction in Comparative Perspective: A Panel Study of Military Spending and Carbon Emissions, 1960–2014”. Journal of World-Systems Research. 23 (2): 298–325. doi:10.5195/jwsr.2017.688.
292. ^ “The Military’s Impact on the environment” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 March 2018. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
293. ^ “The Military-Environmental Complex” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 October 2015. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
294. ^ “The potential of the military in environmental protection: India”. www.fao.org. Archived from the original on 6 March 2019. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
295. ^ Lawrence, Michael J.; Stemberger, Holly L.J.; Zolderdo, Aaron J.; Struthers, Daniel P.; Cooke, Steven J. (2015). “The effects of modern war and military activities on biodiversity and the environment”. Environmental Reviews. 23 (4): 443–460. doi:10.1139/er-2015-0039. hdl:1807/69913.
296. ^ see Gledistch, Nils (1997). Conflict and the Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
297. ^ Kyba, Christopher; Garz, Stefanie; Kuechly, Helga; de Miguel, Alejandro; Zamorano, Jaime; Fischer, Jürgen; Hölker, Franz (23 December 2014). “High-Resolution Imagery of Earth at Night: New Sources, Opportunities and Challenges”. Remote Sensing. 7 (1): 1–23. Bibcode:2014RemS….7….1K. doi:10.3390/rs70100001.
298. ^ Hölker, Franz; Wolter, Christian; Perkin, Elizabeth K.; Tockner, Klement (December 2010). “Light pollution as a biodiversity threat”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 25 (12): 681–682. Bibcode:2010TEcoE..25..681H. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.007. PMID 21035893.
299. ^ Jump up to:^a b Thomas, Dana (2019). Fashionopolis: The Price of Fast Fashion and the Future of Clothes. Head of Zeus. ISBN 9781789546057.
300. ^ Russon, Mary-Ann (14 February 2020). “Global fashion industry facing a ‘nightmare'”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 22 January 2021.
301. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Niinimäki, Kirsi; Peters, Greg; Dahlbo, Helena; Perry, Patsy; Rissanen, Timo; Gwilt, Alison (15 April 2020). “The environmental price of fast fashion”. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 1 (4): 189–200. Bibcode:2020NRvEE…1..189N. doi:10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9.
302. ^ Nunez, Christina (22 January 2019). “What is global warming, explained”. National Geographic. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 22 January 2021.
303. ^ Carrington, Damian (22 May 2020). “Microplastic pollution in oceans vastly underestimated – study”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 25 November 2020. Retrieved 22 January 2021.
304. ^ Jump up to:^a b Lindeque, Penelope K.; Cole, Matthew; Coppock, Rachel L.; Lewis, Ceri N.; Miller, Rachael Z.; Watts, Andrew J.R.; Wilson-McNeal, Alice; Wright, Stephanie L.; Galloway, Tamara S. (October 2020). “Are we underestimating microplastic abundance in the marine environment? A comparison of microplastic capture with nets of different mesh-size”. Environmental Pollution. 265 (Pt A): 114721. Bibcode:2020EPoll.26514721L. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114721. hdl:10044/1/84083. PMID 32806407.
305. ^ Pfister, Stephan; Bayer, Peter; Koehler, Annette; Hellweg, Stefanie (1 July 2011). “Environmental Impacts of Water Use in Global Crop Production: Hotspots and Trade-Offs with Land Use”. Environmental Science & Technology. 45 (13): 5761–5768. Bibcode:2011EnST…45.5761P. doi:10.1021/es1041755. PMID 21644578.
306. ^ Regan, Helen (28 September 2020). “Asian rivers are turning black. And our colorful closets are to blame”. CNN. Archived from the original on 27 February 2021. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
307. ^ “World Scientist’s Warning to Humanity” (PDF). Union of Concerned Scientists. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
308. ^ Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F. (December 2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342.