Sustainable technology of 4980

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4980 ?

Sustainable technology in 4980 would likely be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. It’s difficult to predict the exact nature of these technologies, but here are some possibilities based on current trends and potential future developments:

Energy:
- Fusion power could be a primary energy source, providing clean and abundant energy.
- Solar energy could be harvested more efficiently through advanced materials and space-based solar farms.
- Energy storage solutions would be highly advanced, allowing for efficient distribution and use of renewable energy.
Transportation:
- Personal air transportation could be common, utilizing electric or other clean energy sources.
- Ground transportation could be dominated by high-speed, hyperloop-style systems.
- Self-driving vehicles would be ubiquitous, optimizing traffic flow and reducing accidents.
Environment:
- Advanced geoengineering techniques could be used to mitigate climate change and restore ecosystems.
- Pollution would be largely eliminated through closed-loop systems and advanced filtration technologies.
- Resource management would be highly efficient, with a focus on recycling and circular economy principles.
Agriculture:
- Vertical farms and controlled-environment agriculture could be used to produce food efficiently and sustainably.
- Genetically modified crops could be more resilient and require fewer resources.
- Precision agriculture techniques could optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.
Manufacturing:
- 3D printing and additive manufacturing could be used to create customized products on demand, reducing waste and transportation costs.
- Advanced robotics and automation could be used to create efficient and sustainable manufacturing processes.
- Sustainable materials and manufacturing processes would be prioritized to minimize environmental impact.

These are just a few possibilities, and the actual sustainable technologies of 4980 could be far more advanced and innovative than anything we can imagine today. However, it’s clear that sustainability would be a central concern in this future world, and technology would play a key role in achieving it.

What is Sustainable technology of 4980 ?

Sustainable technology in 4980 would be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. It’s difficult to predict the exact nature of these technologies, but here are some possibilities based on current trends and potential future developments:

Energy:
- Fusion power could be a primary energy source, providing clean and abundant energy.
- Solar energy could be harvested more efficiently through advanced materials and space-based solar farms.
- Energy storage solutions would be highly advanced, allowing for efficient distribution and use of renewable energy.
Transportation:
- Personal air transportation could be common, utilizing electric or other clean energy sources.
- Ground transportation could be dominated by high-speed, hyperloop-style systems.
- Self-driving vehicles would be ubiquitous, optimizing traffic flow and reducing accidents.
Environment:
- Advanced geoengineering techniques could be used to mitigate climate change and restore ecosystems.
- Pollution would be largely eliminated through closed-loop systems and advanced filtration technologies.
- Resource management would be highly efficient, with a focus on recycling and circular economy principles.
Agriculture:
- Vertical farms and controlled-environment agriculture could be used to produce food efficiently and sustainably.
- Genetically modified crops could be more resilient and require fewer resources.
- Precision agriculture techniques could optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.
Manufacturing:
- 3D printing and additive manufacturing could be used to create customized products on demand, reducing waste and transportation costs.
- Advanced robotics and automation could be used to create efficient and sustainable manufacturing processes.
- Sustainable materials and manufacturing processes would be prioritized to minimize environmental impact.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4980 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 4980 would be essential for everyone. Here’s why:

Resource Scarcity: Even with advanced technology, the Earth’s resources are finite. By 4980, sustainable practices would be crucial to ensure enough resources for everyone.
Environmental Concerns: Climate change and pollution would likely be major threats. Sustainable technology would be necessary to mitigate these issues and maintain a habitable planet.
Economic Stability: Sustainable practices would be essential for long-term economic stability. By using resources efficiently and minimizing waste, societies could avoid economic collapse.
Social Equity: Sustainable technology could help ensure that everyone has access to basic necessities like food, water, and energy. This would promote social equity and reduce conflict.

In short, sustainable technology in 4980 would be a necessity for human survival and well-being. It would be something that everyone relies on, whether they realize it or not.

Think of it like this: Today, we all rely on technologies like electricity and the internet. In 4980, sustainable technology would be just as fundamental to daily life.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4980 ?

Sustainable technology in 4980 wouldn’t be something that’s suddenly “required” at that specific point in time. It would be the result of a long and gradual process of development and adoption.

Here’s a breakdown of how it would become essential:

Ongoing Evolution: Sustainable technologies would continuously evolve and improve over centuries, driven by necessity and innovation.
Gradual Integration: These technologies would become increasingly integrated into all aspects of life, from energy production and transportation to agriculture and manufacturing.
Shifting Priorities: Societies would likely prioritize sustainability due to growing environmental concerns and resource limitations.
Generational Change: Future generations would grow up with sustainable technology as a normal part of their lives, making it an integral part of their worldview.

Therefore, it’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 4980 would be the culmination of centuries of progress and a fundamental necessity for that era. It wouldn’t be a sudden requirement, but rather the result of a long-term shift towards a sustainable way of life.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4980 ?

Sustainable technology in 4980 would be required everywhere. It wouldn’t be confined to specific locations but rather integrated into all aspects of life and across the globe. Here’s why:

Global Challenges: Issues like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are global in nature. Sustainable technology would be necessary to address these challenges on a planetary scale.
Interconnected Systems: By 4980, human societies would likely be even more interconnected than they are today. Sustainable technology would be needed to ensure the smooth functioning of these complex systems.
Universal Needs: Everyone, regardless of their location, would rely on sustainable technology for basic necessities like food, water, energy, and transportation.
Environmental Stewardship: Sustainable technology would be essential for maintaining healthy ecosystems and preserving biodiversity across the planet.

Think of it this way: Just as we rely on electricity and communication networks globally today, people in 4980 would depend on sustainable technology as a fundamental part of their environment, regardless of where they live.

Therefore, sustainable technology in 4980 would be a global necessity, woven into the fabric of everyday life and essential for the well-being of all.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4980 ?

Sustainable technology in 4980 wouldn’t be “required” in the sense of a sudden mandate. Instead, it would be the result of a long, evolutionary process where it becomes indispensable for survival and a high quality of life. Here’s how it would become essential:

Necessity Driven Innovation: Over centuries, resource scarcity, environmental degradation, and population growth would necessitate the development and adoption of sustainable solutions. Innovation would be driven by these pressing needs.
Economic and Social Pressures: Unsustainable practices would become increasingly costly and disruptive, both economically and socially. This would create strong incentives to adopt sustainable alternatives.
Technological Advancement: Scientific breakthroughs and engineering advancements would make sustainable technologies more efficient, affordable, and widely available.
Cultural Shift: Over generations, a shift in values and attitudes would occur, with sustainability becoming deeply ingrained in societal consciousness. Future generations would grow up with sustainable practices as the norm.
Systemic Integration: Sustainable technologies would become seamlessly integrated into all aspects of life, from infrastructure and transportation to agriculture and manufacturing. They would be the foundation of how society functions.

So, it’s not about a “requirement” imposed at a specific point. Instead, the need for sustainable technology would organically arise from the challenges and opportunities faced over centuries, leading to its widespread adoption and integration into the fabric of civilization by 4980. It would become so fundamental that life without it would be unimaginable.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4980 ?

It’s fascinating to think about what a case study of sustainable technology in 4980 might look like! Since we can only speculate, let’s imagine a scenario and explore it as a potential case study:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 4980

Background: By the mid-25th century, the Amazon rainforest had been severely depleted due to deforestation, climate change, and unsustainable resource extraction. This loss had devastating consequences for biodiversity, global climate patterns, and indigenous communities.

The Solution: In response, a global initiative was launched to revitalize the Amazon using a combination of advanced sustainable technologies:

Bio-Regenerative Engineering: Nanobots were deployed to repair damaged ecosystems, rebuild soil structure, and reintroduce native plant species. These nanobots were programmed to interact with the environment in a way that promoted natural regeneration and biodiversity.
Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Large-scale atmospheric carbon capture facilities were established to remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and mitigate climate change. This captured carbon was then used to create sustainable materials for construction and manufacturing.
Advanced Agroforestry: Sustainable agriculture practices were implemented that combined the cultivation of crops with the planting of trees. This approach helped to restore soil fertility, protect water resources, and provide economic opportunities for local communities.
Indigenous Knowledge Integration: Traditional ecological knowledge from indigenous communities was integrated into the revitalization efforts. This ensured that the solutions were culturally appropriate and respectful of the environment.

Results: By 4980, the Amazon rainforest had been largely restored to its former glory. Biodiversity had rebounded, climate patterns had stabilized, and indigenous communities were thriving. The revitalization of the Amazon became a symbol of hope and a testament to the power of sustainable technology.

Lessons Learned:

Long-term commitment: The revitalization of the Amazon required a long-term commitment from governments, organizations, and individuals. It demonstrated that sustainable solutions often take time and sustained effort to achieve.
Technological innovation: Advanced technologies like nanobots and atmospheric carbon capture played a crucial role in the success of the project. This highlighted the importance of investing in research and development of sustainable technologies.
Collaboration and integration: The revitalization of the Amazon required collaboration between scientists, engineers, policymakers, and indigenous communities. This emphasized the need for interdisciplinary and inclusive approaches to sustainability.

Conclusion:

The case study of the Amazon rainforest in 4980 would serve as an inspiring example of how sustainable technology can be used to address global challenges and create a more sustainable future. It would demonstrate that even seemingly insurmountable problems can be solved through innovation, collaboration, and a long-term commitment to sustainability.

This is just one possible case study, of course. In reality, sustainable technology in 4980 would likely be used to address a wide range of challenges, from climate change and resource scarcity to poverty and inequality. These technologies would be constantly evolving and improving, driven by the ongoing need to create a more sustainable world.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4980 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4980: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract: This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4980. While predicting the specifics is inherently speculative, we can extrapolate from current trends and envision how advanced technologies, coupled with a deep societal commitment to sustainability, might shape a future world. This paper examines potential advancements in key areas, highlighting the interconnectedness of these technologies and their importance for long-term human well-being.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is a continuous journey. By 4980, it is envisioned that sustainable practices will be deeply ingrained in all facets of human civilization. This paper explores potential technological advancements across several critical sectors, recognizing that these innovations will be driven by necessity, ingenuity, and a long-term vision for planetary health.

2. Energy:

Fusion Power Dominance: Fusion energy, long a theoretical promise, is expected to be a primary energy source, providing clean, abundant, and safe power.
Advanced Solar Harvesting: Space-based solar farms and highly efficient nanomaterial-based solar collectors on Earth will maximize solar energy capture.
Global Energy Grid: A sophisticated, interconnected global energy grid will efficiently distribute power, minimizing transmission losses and optimizing resource allocation.
Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Advanced energy storage solutions, potentially utilizing novel quantum technologies, will ensure a stable and reliable energy supply, even with fluctuating renewable sources.

3. Environment:

Geoengineering and Climate Management: Advanced geoengineering techniques, carefully monitored and controlled, will be used to manage the Earth’s climate and mitigate the effects of past environmental damage.
Pollution Remediation and Resource Recovery: Nanotechnology and advanced filtration systems will eliminate pollution at its source, and closed-loop systems will maximize resource recovery and minimize waste.
Ecosystem Restoration: Bio-regenerative technologies, including nanobots and genetic engineering, will assist in restoring damaged ecosystems and preserving biodiversity.
Ocean Revitalization: Ocean acidification will be reversed, and marine ecosystems will be thriving, thanks to targeted interventions and sustainable fishing practices.

4. Food and Agriculture:

Vertical Farming and Controlled-Environment Agriculture: Highly efficient vertical farms and controlled-environment agriculture facilities will produce food locally, minimizing transportation costs and environmental impact.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered precision agriculture techniques will optimize resource use, minimize waste, and maximize crop yields.
Sustainable Aquaculture: Sustainable aquaculture practices will provide a healthy source of protein while protecting marine ecosystems.
Lab-Grown and Alternative Proteins: Advanced biotechnology will provide sustainable and ethical sources of protein through lab-grown meat and other alternatives.

5. Manufacturing and Materials:

Advanced 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: On-demand manufacturing through highly advanced 3D printing will minimize waste, reduce transportation needs, and enable customized production.
Sustainable Materials: Biomaterials, recycled materials, and other sustainable alternatives will replace traditional materials, minimizing environmental impact.
Circular Economy: A fully realized circular economy will ensure that resources are used efficiently and that waste is minimized at every stage of the product lifecycle.

6. Transportation:

Personal Air Mobility: Safe and efficient personal air transportation, powered by clean energy, could be commonplace, reducing traffic congestion and travel times.
Hyperloop Systems: High-speed hyperloop systems will connect cities and regions, enabling rapid and sustainable long-distance travel.
Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles will be ubiquitous, optimizing traffic flow, reducing accidents, and improving energy efficiency.

7. Society and Well-being:

Global Connectivity: Advanced communication technologies will connect people across the globe, fostering collaboration and understanding.
Personalized Healthcare: AI-powered diagnostics and personalized medicine will improve health outcomes and extend lifespans.
Education and Access to Information: Universal access to education and information will empower individuals and promote social progress.

8. Challenges and Considerations:

Ethical Implications: The development and deployment of advanced technologies will require careful consideration of ethical implications and potential unintended consequences.
Equity and Access: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and resources will be crucial for promoting social justice and avoiding a technological divide.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and collaboration.

9. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 4980 presented in this white paper is ambitious but achievable. By embracing innovation, prioritizing sustainability, and working together, humanity can create a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony, ensuring a thriving planet for generations to come. Continuous research, development, and a commitment to ethical considerations will be essential to realizing this vision.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4980 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4980! Here are some possibilities, extrapolating from current trends and potential future developments:

1. Advanced Manufacturing:

Nanofactories: Imagine factories at the nanoscale, able to manipulate individual atoms and molecules to create materials and products with unprecedented precision and efficiency. These nanofactories would operate with minimal waste and energy consumption, producing everything from advanced electronics to personalized medicines.
4D Printing: This technology could allow for the creation of objects that can change shape or function over time in response to stimuli like temperature or light. This could revolutionize manufacturing by enabling the creation of self-assembling structures, adaptable materials, and products that can repair themselves.
Biomanufacturing: Imagine factories that use biological processes to produce materials and products. This could involve using engineered microorganisms to create biofuels, bioplastics, and other sustainable materials.

2. Resource Management:

Closed-loop Recycling: Advanced recycling technologies would enable the complete recovery and reuse of materials, creating a truly circular economy. Waste would be virtually eliminated, and resources would be used with maximum efficiency.
Resource Extraction from Waste: Imagine technologies that can extract valuable resources from waste materials, such as rare earth minerals from electronic devices or precious metals from industrial byproducts. This could reduce our reliance on mining and help to conserve natural resources.
Atmospheric Resource Harvesting: Technologies could be developed to extract resources directly from the atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide for use in manufacturing or water vapor for use in agriculture.

3. Energy Production and Distribution:

Fusion Power Plants: Fusion energy would likely be a primary source of clean and abundant energy, powering industries and cities around the world.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar farms in space could capture vast amounts of solar energy and beam it back to Earth, providing a continuous and reliable source of power.
Smart Grids: Highly advanced smart grids would optimize energy distribution and minimize waste, ensuring that energy is used efficiently and sustainably.

4. Environmental Remediation:

Pollution Capture and Conversion: Nanotechnology and advanced filtration systems could be used to capture pollutants from industrial emissions and convert them into harmless substances or even valuable resources.
Ecosystem Restoration: Bio-regenerative technologies, including nanobots and genetic engineering, could be used to restore damaged ecosystems and revitalize industrial areas.

5. Transportation and Logistics:

Sustainable Transportation Networks: Industries would rely on sustainable transportation networks, including high-speed hyperloop systems, autonomous vehicles, and personal air transportation, to move goods and people efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.
Localized Production: 3D printing and additive manufacturing could enable localized production of goods, reducing the need for long-distance transportation and minimizing transportation costs and emissions.

These are just a few examples of the potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4980. It’s important to remember that these technologies would be constantly evolving and improving, driven by the ongoing need to create a more sustainable and prosperous future.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4980 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development that would lead to sustainable technology in 4980! Here are some potential areas of focus, extrapolating from current scientific trends and future possibilities:

1. Fundamental Materials Science:

Novel Materials: Research would focus on discovering and developing new materials with extraordinary properties, such as:
- Superconductive materials: For lossless energy transmission and advanced computing.
- Self-healing materials: For infrastructure and products that can repair themselves.
- Adaptive materials: That can change their properties in response to environmental stimuli.
- Ultra-strong, lightweight materials: For advanced transportation and construction.
Nanomaterials: Continued exploration of nanomaterials and their applications, including:
- Nanobots: For medical applications, environmental remediation, and manufacturing.
- Nanocomposites: For creating incredibly strong and durable materials.
- Quantum dots: For advanced energy harvesting and sensing.

2. Energy Technologies:

Fusion Energy: Continued research and development on fusion energy to make it a practical and efficient power source.
Advanced Solar Energy: Exploring new ways to capture and convert solar energy, such as:
- Space-based solar power: To capture vast amounts of solar energy in space and beam it back to Earth.
- Highly efficient photovoltaic materials: To convert sunlight into electricity with minimal loss.
Energy Storage: Developing advanced energy storage solutions, such as:
- Supercapacitors: With high energy density and fast charging capabilities.
- Novel battery technologies: Based on new materials and electrochemical processes.
- Quantum energy storage: Potentially utilizing quantum phenomena to store energy with incredible efficiency.

3. Biotechnology and Bioengineering:

Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems to perform new functions, such as:
- Biomanufacturing: Using microorganisms to produce materials and products.
- Bio-remediation: Using organisms to clean up pollution and restore ecosystems.
- Enhanced agriculture: Developing crops that are more resilient and require fewer resources.
Genetic Engineering: Continued research on genetic engineering to:
- Improve human health: Develop cures for diseases and enhance human capabilities.
- Enhance biodiversity: Protect endangered species and restore ecosystems.
- Create sustainable agriculture: Develop crops that are more nutritious and require fewer resources.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics:

Advanced AI: Developing AI systems that are more intelligent, adaptable, and capable of solving complex problems.
Robotics: Creating robots that are more sophisticated and capable of performing a wide range of tasks, such as:
- Manufacturing: Automated factories and production lines.
- Healthcare: Robotic surgery and patient care.
- Environmental remediation: Robots for cleaning up pollution and restoring ecosystems.

5. Environmental Science and Geoengineering:

Climate Modeling: Developing more accurate climate models to understand and predict climate change.
Geoengineering: Researching and developing safe and effective geoengineering techniques to mitigate climate change.
Ecosystem Restoration: Developing new methods for restoring damaged ecosystems and preserving biodiversity.

6. Social Sciences and Sustainability Studies:

Sustainable Development: Researching and developing strategies for achieving sustainable development goals.
Environmental Economics: Studying the economic aspects of sustainability and developing policies to promote sustainable practices.
Social and Ethical Implications: Examining the social and ethical implications of new technologies and developing guidelines for their responsible use.

This is just a glimpse into the potential areas of research and development that could lead to sustainable technology in 4980. It’s important to remember that these fields are constantly evolving, and new areas of research and development will undoubtedly emerge in the centuries to come. The key is to foster a culture of innovation and collaboration, and to prioritize research that addresses the challenges of sustainability and promotes the well-being of all.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.