Leave a Comment / Blog / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable technology of 4970 ?

It seems like you might be asking about sustainable technologies that could exist in the year 4970. That’s a fascinating question!

While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, we can speculate based on current trends and scientific advancements. Here are some possibilities for sustainable technologies in 4970:

  • Advanced Energy Systems:
    • Fusion Power: By 4970, fusion power might be a well-established and efficient energy source, providing clean and abundant energy.
    • Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar energy collectors in space could beam energy down to Earth, providing a continuous and inexhaustible source of power.
    • Zero-Point Energy: Perhaps technologies will have been developed to harness zero-point energy, a theoretical energy source derived from quantum fluctuations in empty space.
  • Environmental Remediation:
    • Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Advanced technologies could efficiently remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, reversing the effects of climate change.
    • Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Highly sophisticated systems could clean up pollution in the oceans and restore marine ecosystems to their former health.
    • Waste Transformation: Waste might be completely eliminated through advanced recycling and transformation processes, turning waste into valuable resources.
  • Resource Management:
    • Closed-Loop Systems: Production and consumption might operate in closed-loop systems, where resources are continuously recycled and reused, minimizing waste and environmental impact.
    • Sustainable Materials: Advanced materials science could lead to the development of highly durable, biodegradable, and sustainably sourced materials for all aspects of life.
    • Precision Agriculture: Agriculture could be highly optimized through advanced technologies, using resources like water and nutrients with maximum efficiency and minimizing environmental impact.
  • Transportation:
    • Hyperloop Networks: High-speed transportation networks like hyperloops could connect cities and regions, reducing travel time and energy consumption.
    • Flying Cars and Personal Aircraft: Personal air transportation might be commonplace, powered by clean energy sources and integrated into smart traffic management systems.
    • Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles could be ubiquitous, optimizing traffic flow and reducing accidents, while also being powered by sustainable energy.
  • Other Possibilities:
    • Biotechnology: Advanced biotechnology could provide solutions for sustainable food production, disease treatment, and environmental restoration.
    • Artificial Intelligence: AI could play a crucial role in optimizing resource management, energy distribution, and environmental monitoring.
    • Space Colonization: By 4970, humans might have established self-sustaining colonies on other planets, expanding our reach while preserving Earth’s resources.

It’s important to remember that these are just speculations. The actual technologies of 4970 could be very different from what we can imagine today. However, the pursuit of sustainability will likely continue to be a major driving force behind technological development in the centuries to come.

What is Sustainable technology of 4970 ?

It seems like you’re asking about sustainable technologies that might exist in the year 4970. That’s a really interesting question!

While we can’t predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and scientific advancements. Here are some possibilities for sustainable technologies that might exist in 4970:

  • Advanced Energy Systems:
    • Fusion Power: By 4970, fusion power might be a well-established and efficient energy source, providing clean and abundant energy.
    • Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar energy collectors in space could beam energy down to Earth, providing a continuous and inexhaustible source of power.
    • Zero-Point Energy: Perhaps technologies will have been developed to harness zero-point energy, a theoretical energy source derived from quantum fluctuations in empty space.
  • Environmental Remediation:
    • Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Advanced technologies could efficiently remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, reversing the effects of climate change.
    • Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Highly sophisticated systems could clean up pollution in the oceans and restore marine ecosystems to their former health.
    • Waste Transformation: Waste might be completely eliminated through advanced recycling and transformation processes, turning waste into valuable resources.
  • Resource Management:
    • Closed-Loop Systems: Production and consumption might operate in closed-loop systems, where resources are continuously recycled and reused, minimizing waste and environmental impact.
    • Sustainable Materials: Advanced materials science could lead to the development of highly durable, biodegradable, and sustainably sourced materials for all aspects of life.
    • Precision Agriculture: Agriculture could be highly optimized through advanced technologies, using resources like water and nutrients with maximum efficiency and minimizing environmental impact.
  • Transportation:
    • Hyperloop Networks: High-speed transportation networks like hyperloops could connect cities and regions, reducing travel time and energy consumption.
    • Flying Cars and Personal Aircraft: Personal air transportation might be commonplace, powered by clean energy sources and integrated into smart traffic management systems.
    • Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles could be ubiquitous, optimizing traffic flow and reducing accidents, while also being powered by sustainable energy.
  • Other Possibilities:
    • Biotechnology: Advanced biotechnology could provide solutions for sustainable food production, disease treatment, and environmental restoration.
    • Artificial Intelligence: AI could play a crucial role in optimizing resource management, energy distribution, and environmental monitoring.
    • Space Colonization: By 4970, humans might have established self-sustaining colonies on other planets, expanding our reach while preserving Earth’s resources.

It’s important to remember that these are just speculations. The actual technologies of 4970 could be very different from what we can imagine today. However, the pursuit of sustainability will likely continue to be a major driving force behind technological development in the centuries to come.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4970 ?

That’s a great question! It helps to think about “who” in a broad sense when we talk about sustainable technology in the distant future. Here’s a breakdown of who might be involved with and benefit from sustainable technology in 4970:

  • Humanity as a Whole: This is the most important “who.” Sustainable technologies would be essential for the long-term survival and well-being of humanity. They would help ensure access to resources, a healthy environment, and a stable climate for all people.
  • Future Generations: Those living in 4970 and beyond would be the direct beneficiaries of sustainable technologies. They would inherit a world where resources are managed responsibly, and the environment is protected.
  • Governments and Organizations: In 4970, governing bodies and organizations would likely play a crucial role in developing, implementing, and regulating sustainable technologies. They would need to create policies that encourage sustainable practices and ensure equitable access to resources.
  • Scientists and Engineers: These individuals would be at the forefront of developing new sustainable technologies. Their research and innovation would be essential for finding solutions to the challenges of resource management, environmental protection, and energy production.
  • Individuals and Communities: Everyone would have a role to play in using and supporting sustainable technologies. This could involve making conscious choices about consumption, transportation, and energy use.
  • Other Species and Ecosystems: Sustainable technologies should also consider the needs of other species and ecosystems. Protecting biodiversity and maintaining healthy ecosystems would be essential for the overall health of the planet.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4970 would be something that benefits all of life on Earth, both present and future. It would require a collective effort from individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure a sustainable and thriving future for all.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4970 ?

That’s a very insightful question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will exist in 4970, but when it will be needed.

The answer is: Sustainable technology will be required in 4970 (and beyond) for the same reasons it’s required today: to ensure the long-term well-being of humanity and the planet.

Here’s why:

  • Resource Scarcity: Even with advancements in technology, the Earth’s resources are finite. By 4970, we may have depleted many easily accessible resources. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for managing remaining resources responsibly and efficiently.
  • Environmental Degradation: Climate change, pollution, and habitat destruction are ongoing challenges. Sustainable technologies will be needed to reverse the damage already done and prevent further environmental harm.
  • Population Growth: If the human population continues to grow, sustainable technologies will be essential for providing food, water, energy, and other necessities for everyone.
  • Maintaining a Thriving Society: Sustainable technologies will be needed to support a healthy and prosperous society in 4970. This includes providing clean energy, efficient transportation, and sustainable infrastructure.

In short, the need for sustainable technology in 4970 will arise from the same fundamental challenges we face today. It’s about ensuring a livable planet and a good quality of life for future generations.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology isn’t just a future concern. It’s something we need to be developing and implementing now to ensure a sustainable future for all.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4970 ?

You’re right to think about the “where” of sustainable technology in 4970! It won’t be confined to just one place, but rather integrated into all aspects of life. Here are some key areas where sustainable technology would be essential in 4970:

  • Urban Centers: Cities would likely be designed with sustainability in mind, featuring:
    • Vertical Farms: High-rise buildings could incorporate vertical farms to produce food locally, reducing transportation needs and land use.
    • Smart Grids: Intelligent energy grids would optimize energy distribution and usage, minimizing waste.
    • Green Infrastructure: Parks, gardens, and green roofs would be integrated into urban landscapes to improve air quality and provide natural spaces.
  • Rural Areas: Sustainable technology would be crucial for:
    • Precision Agriculture: Farms would use technology to optimize resource use, minimizing water waste and environmental impact.
    • Renewable Energy: Rural communities could rely on localized renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and biomass.
    • Ecological Restoration: Technologies could be used to restore degraded ecosystems and protect biodiversity.
  • Transportation Systems: Sustainable technologies would be integrated into:
    • Hyperloop Networks: High-speed transportation systems would connect cities and regions efficiently.
    • Personal Air Transportation: Flying cars and personal aircraft could be powered by clean energy sources.
    • Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles would optimize traffic flow and reduce accidents.
  • Homes and Buildings: Sustainable technologies would be incorporated into:
    • Energy-Efficient Appliances: Homes would be equipped with appliances that minimize energy and water consumption.
    • Smart Home Systems: Intelligent systems would automate energy management and resource optimization.
    • Sustainable Building Materials: Homes would be built with durable, biodegradable, and sustainably sourced materials.
  • Industrial Sectors: Sustainable technologies would be essential for:
    • Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Factories would operate in closed-loop systems, minimizing waste and maximizing resource reuse.
    • Clean Energy Sources: Industries would rely on renewable energy sources to power their operations.
    • Waste Transformation: Advanced technologies would transform waste into valuable resources.
  • Space: By 4970, humans might have established colonies on other planets. Sustainable technologies would be crucial for:
    • Resource Management: Space colonies would need to manage resources efficiently and sustainably.
    • Life Support Systems: Technologies would be needed to create closed-loop life support systems for long-term space habitation.
    • In-Situ Resource Utilization: Technologies could be developed to utilize resources found on other planets.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 4970 would be woven into the fabric of everyday life, from the homes we live in to the transportation systems we use and the industries that produce our goods. It would be a global effort, with sustainable technologies being implemented in all regions and sectors to ensure a thriving future for humanity and the planet.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4970 ?

You’re asking about the how – how sustainable technology will be achieved by 4970. It’s a long journey, and the path will involve many interconnected steps. Here’s a breakdown:

  • Continuous Research and Development: This is the foundation. Investing in scientific research across multiple disciplines (materials science, energy, biotechnology, AI, etc.) is crucial. We need to constantly push the boundaries of what’s possible.
  • Global Collaboration: Sharing knowledge, resources, and expertise across nations will accelerate progress. International partnerships and collaborations will be essential for tackling global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity.
  • Education and Awareness: Fostering a deep understanding of sustainability and its importance is vital. Educating future generations about sustainable practices and technologies will empower them to make informed choices.
  • Policy and Regulation: Governments will play a key role in creating policies that incentivize sustainable practices and discourage unsustainable ones. Regulations will be needed to ensure that technologies are developed and used responsibly.
  • Economic Incentives: Making sustainable technologies economically viable is essential for widespread adoption. This could involve subsidies, tax breaks, or other incentives to encourage businesses and individuals to invest in sustainable solutions.
  • Technological Innovation: Breakthroughs in areas like energy storage, materials science, and artificial intelligence will be crucial for developing truly sustainable technologies.
  • Systems Thinking: Recognizing the interconnectedness of different systems (energy, water, food, transportation) is essential. Sustainable solutions will need to consider the whole system, not just individual components.
  • Adaptive Management: The world is constantly changing, so our approach to sustainability must be flexible. We need to be able to adapt our strategies and technologies as new challenges and opportunities arise.
  • Ethical Considerations: As we develop new technologies, we must consider their ethical implications. We need to ensure that sustainable technologies are used in a way that benefits all of humanity and protects the planet.
  • Behavioral Change: Ultimately, the success of sustainable technology will depend on individual choices. People will need to adopt more sustainable lifestyles, reducing their consumption and making more environmentally friendly choices.

It’s important to remember that achieving sustainable technology by 4970 is not just about inventing new gadgets. It’s about a fundamental shift in how we live, work, and interact with the planet. It’s a continuous process that requires a long-term vision, global cooperation, and a commitment to creating a better future for all.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4970 ?

It’s impossible to create a real case study for sustainable technology in 4970 because we can’t predict the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential advancements. This allows us to explore the complexities and possibilities.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Great Atmospheric Restoration Project (GARP) – 4970

Background: By the mid-25th century, despite significant progress, remnants of past environmental damage, particularly concerning atmospheric composition, still posed challenges. While carbon capture technologies had been developed, they were insufficient to fully reverse the effects of centuries of industrial activity. This led to the initiation of the Great Atmospheric Restoration Project (GARP) in 2542.

GARP’s Goals:

  • Restore Pre-Industrial Atmospheric Composition: Return the atmosphere to a composition resembling that before the Industrial Revolution, with balanced levels of greenhouse gases and other pollutants.
  • Enhance Natural Carbon Sinks: Revitalize and expand natural carbon sinks like forests, oceans, and wetlands.
  • Develop Long-Term Atmospheric Management Systems: Create systems to monitor and regulate atmospheric composition to prevent future imbalances.

Key Technologies and Strategies:

  • Advanced Carbon Capture and Conversion: GARP utilized highly efficient carbon capture technologies that could extract CO2 from even dilute sources. Captured CO2 was then converted into stable, usable forms, such as sustainable fuels and construction materials.
  • Stratospheric Aerosol Injection: Carefully managed injections of reflective aerosols into the stratosphere were used to temporarily deflect sunlight and cool the planet, giving ecosystems time to recover. This was a controversial technique and strictly regulated.
  • Bioengineered Carbon-Sequestering Organisms: Scientists developed microorganisms that could efficiently capture and store carbon in various ecosystems, from forests to oceans.
  • Global Ecosystem Restoration: Massive reforestation and wetland restoration projects were undertaken, along with efforts to revitalize ocean ecosystems and coral reefs.
  • AI-Powered Atmospheric Monitoring and Management: A sophisticated AI system was developed to monitor global atmospheric conditions, predict changes, and recommend corrective actions.

Challenges and Outcomes:

  • Unforeseen Consequences: Some initial interventions had unintended side effects, requiring adjustments and further research.
  • Geopolitical Cooperation: GARP required unprecedented levels of international cooperation, as atmospheric management had global implications.
  • Long-Term Sustainability: Ensuring the long-term sustainability of the restored atmosphere required continuous monitoring, adaptation, and commitment from all nations.

By 4970, GARP had largely achieved its goals. The atmosphere was restored to a healthy state, natural carbon sinks were thriving, and advanced monitoring systems were in place to prevent future imbalances. GARP serves as a testament to humanity’s ability to address global challenges through scientific innovation, international cooperation, and a commitment to sustainability.

This is just one hypothetical example. Other case studies could focus on:

  • Sustainable food production for a population of 20 billion.
  • The transition to a completely circular economy.
  • The development of self-sustaining space colonies.

By exploring these hypothetical scenarios, we can better understand the potential challenges and opportunities that lie ahead and begin to develop the sustainable technologies that will be needed to create a thriving future.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4970 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4970 – A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4970. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and scientific advancements to envision a world where technology plays a crucial role in ensuring the long-term well-being of humanity and the planet. This paper examines potential advancements in key areas, including energy, resource management, environmental remediation, transportation, and societal structures, highlighting the interconnectedness of these domains and the importance of ethical considerations.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is a continuous journey. By 4970, humanity will likely have faced and overcome numerous challenges related to resource scarcity, environmental degradation, and population growth. This paper posits that sustainable technologies will be at the heart of solutions to these challenges, enabling a thriving and equitable future for all.

2. Key Areas of Technological Advancement:

2.1 Energy:

  • Fusion Power: Fusion energy, potentially commercially viable by the 22nd century, could become the dominant energy source, providing clean, abundant, and safe power.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit could capture vast amounts of solar energy and beam it back to Earth, providing a continuous and inexhaustible supply.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and scalable energy storage solutions will be crucial for balancing intermittent renewable energy sources and ensuring reliable power supply.
  • Zero-Point Energy (Speculative): While still theoretical, research into zero-point energy may yield breakthroughs, offering a potentially limitless energy source.

2.2 Resource Management:

  • Circular Economy: Closed-loop systems will be the norm, where resources are continuously recycled and reused, minimizing waste and environmental impact.
  • Advanced Materials Science: Durable, biodegradable, and sustainably sourced materials will be used in all aspects of life, from construction to manufacturing.
  • Precision Resource Extraction: Advanced technologies will enable highly targeted and efficient resource extraction, minimizing environmental disruption.
  • AI-Driven Resource Optimization: Artificial intelligence will play a critical role in optimizing resource allocation, distribution, and consumption.

2.3 Environmental Remediation:

  • Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Conversion: Advanced technologies will actively remove excess greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, reversing the effects of climate change.
  • Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Sophisticated systems will clean up pollution in the oceans and restore marine ecosystems to their former health.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Degraded ecosystems will be actively restored through bioengineering and other advanced techniques.
  • Geoengineering (Controlled and Localized): In limited and carefully controlled circumstances, geoengineering techniques might be used to mitigate specific environmental challenges.

2.4 Transportation:

  • Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop networks will connect cities and regions, drastically reducing travel time and energy consumption.
  • Advanced Air Mobility: Personal air transportation, powered by clean energy, will be integrated into smart traffic management systems.
  • Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles will be ubiquitous, optimizing traffic flow, reducing accidents, and minimizing energy use.
  • Sustainable Aviation Fuels: Aviation will rely on sustainable fuels derived from renewable sources or advanced carbon capture technologies.

2.5 Societal Structures:

  • Smart Cities: Urban centers will be designed with sustainability in mind, integrating green infrastructure, smart grids, and efficient resource management systems.
  • Decentralized Production: Localized manufacturing and food production will reduce transportation needs and promote community self-sufficiency.
  • Global Collaboration and Governance: International cooperation will be essential for addressing global challenges and ensuring equitable access to resources.
  • Ethical AI and Automation: Artificial intelligence and automation will be used responsibly, prioritizing human well-being and social equity.

3. Challenges and Considerations:

  • Technological Feasibility: While the technologies described above are plausible, significant research and development will be required to make them a reality.
  • Economic Viability: Sustainable technologies must be economically competitive to ensure widespread adoption.
  • Ethical Implications: Careful consideration must be given to the ethical implications of new technologies, particularly in areas like AI and geoengineering.
  • Social Equity: Sustainable technologies must be accessible to all, regardless of socioeconomic status or geographic location.
  • Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges requires international cooperation and a shared commitment to sustainability.

4. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 4970 presented in this white paper is ambitious but achievable. By investing in research and development, fostering global collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can create a future where technology empowers humanity to live in harmony with the planet. This future is not just a possibility, but a necessity, if we are to ensure the long-term well-being of all life on Earth.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4970 ?

You’re right to ask about the industrial applications! Sustainable technology in 4970 wouldn’t just be about individual actions; it would revolutionize entire industries. Here are some key examples:

1. Manufacturing:

  • Closed-Loop Production Systems: Factories would operate on circular economy principles. Raw materials would be sourced sustainably, products would be designed for disassembly and reuse, and waste would be virtually eliminated.
  • Additive Manufacturing (4D Printing): Advanced 4D printing technologies could create products that adapt and change over time, optimizing performance and extending lifespan. Imagine a machine tool that reconfigures itself based on the task at hand.
  • Biomanufacturing: Biological processes would be used to produce materials, chemicals, and even electronics. This could involve growing materials with specific properties or using engineered microorganisms to synthesize complex compounds.
  • AI-Powered Optimization: Artificial intelligence would manage entire manufacturing processes, optimizing energy use, resource allocation, and production schedules for maximum efficiency and minimal environmental impact.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

  • Fusion Power Plants: Fusion reactors would provide clean and abundant energy for industrial processes, powering everything from manufacturing to resource extraction.
  • Space-Based Solar Energy: Industries could access continuous and inexhaustible solar energy beamed down from space, eliminating reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Smart Grids: Intelligent energy grids would distribute power efficiently, minimizing transmission losses and optimizing energy use across industrial facilities.
  • Decentralized Energy Systems: Industries might rely on localized renewable energy sources, such as microgrids powered by solar, wind, or biomass, reducing dependence on centralized power plants.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

  • Precision Mining: Advanced technologies would enable highly targeted resource extraction, minimizing environmental disruption and waste.
  • In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): Industries might utilize resources found on other planets or celestial bodies, reducing the need to transport materials from Earth.
  • Advanced Recycling and Material Recovery: Highly efficient recycling technologies would recover valuable materials from waste streams, creating a circular economy for industrial materials.
  • Bio-based Materials: Industries would increasingly rely on bio-based materials derived from renewable sources, reducing dependence on fossil fuels and minimizing environmental impact.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

  • Vertical Farms: Urban centers could house large-scale vertical farms, producing food locally and reducing transportation needs.
  • Precision Agriculture: Farms would use sensors, drones, and AI to optimize resource use, minimizing water waste and environmental impact.
  • Sustainable Aquaculture: Advanced aquaculture systems would produce seafood sustainably, reducing pressure on wild fish populations.
  • Alternative Protein Production: Industries might produce alternative proteins through cellular agriculture or other sustainable methods, reducing reliance on traditional livestock farming.

5. Infrastructure Development:

  • Sustainable Construction Materials: Buildings and infrastructure would be built with durable, biodegradable, and sustainably sourced materials.
  • Self-Healing Infrastructure: Advanced materials could enable infrastructure to self-repair, reducing maintenance costs and extending lifespan.
  • Smart Infrastructure: Intelligent systems would monitor and manage infrastructure, optimizing energy use, resource allocation, and maintenance schedules.

6. Transportation and Logistics:

  • Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop networks would transport goods quickly and efficiently, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.
  • Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles would optimize logistics and supply chains, reducing fuel consumption and improving efficiency.
  • Sustainable Aviation Fuels: Industries would rely on sustainable aviation fuels for air transport, minimizing the environmental impact of air travel.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could revolutionize industries by 4970. The key takeaway is that sustainability would be deeply integrated into all aspects of industrial activity, creating a circular economy where resources are used efficiently, waste is minimized, and environmental impact is reduced to a minimum.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4970 ?

You’re spot on to focus on research and development (R&D)! That’s the engine that will drive sustainable technology forward to 4970. Here’s a look at what that R&D might involve:

1. Fundamental Scientific Research:

  • Materials Science: Developing new materials with unique properties (superconductivity, extreme durability, biodegradability) will be crucial for many sustainable technologies.
  • Energy Physics: Continued research into fusion energy, zero-point energy, and other potential energy sources will be essential for providing clean and abundant power.
  • Biology and Biotechnology: Understanding biological systems and harnessing them for sustainable purposes (biomanufacturing, bioremediation) will be a key area of research.
  • Climate Science: Deepening our understanding of climate systems and developing more accurate climate models will be crucial for predicting and mitigating climate change.
  • Artificial Intelligence: Advancing AI and machine learning will be essential for optimizing complex systems and processes related to sustainability.

2. Applied Research and Engineering:

  • Energy Technologies: Developing more efficient solar cells, advanced energy storage solutions, and innovative fusion reactor designs will be crucial for transitioning to a sustainable energy system.
  • Resource Management: Researching and developing technologies for resource extraction, recycling, and waste transformation will be essential for creating a circular economy.
  • Environmental Remediation: Developing advanced carbon capture technologies, ocean cleanup systems, and ecosystem restoration techniques will be crucial for reversing environmental damage.
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Researching and developing precision agriculture techniques, vertical farming systems, and alternative protein production methods will be essential for feeding a growing population sustainably.
  • Transportation Technologies: Developing advanced batteries, fuel cells, and other clean energy technologies for transportation will be crucial for decarbonizing the transportation sector.

3. Interdisciplinary Research:

  • Systems Thinking: Researching and developing models and frameworks for understanding the interconnectedness of different systems (energy, water, food, transportation) will be essential for creating holistic sustainable solutions.
  • Socio-Technical Systems: Studying the interaction between technology and society will be crucial for ensuring that sustainable technologies are developed and used in a way that is equitable and beneficial for all.
  • Ethical Considerations: Researching the ethical implications of new technologies, particularly in areas like AI and geoengineering, will be essential for ensuring responsible innovation.

4. Research Infrastructure and Collaboration:

  • Advanced Research Facilities: Investing in state-of-the-art research facilities, such as supercomputers, advanced materials characterization labs, and large-scale testing facilities, will be crucial for accelerating progress.
  • International Collaboration: Fostering international collaboration and knowledge sharing will be essential for tackling global challenges related to sustainability.
  • Public-Private Partnerships: Encouraging public-private partnerships will help to translate research findings into practical applications and accelerate the development of sustainable technologies.

5. Education and Training:

  • Interdisciplinary Education: Training future generations of scientists, engineers, and policymakers in interdisciplinary approaches to sustainability will be essential for fostering innovation.
  • Lifelong Learning: Providing opportunities for lifelong learning and skill development will be crucial for adapting to the rapidly evolving landscape of sustainable technology.

It’s important to remember that R&D is not a linear process. There will be setbacks and unexpected discoveries along the way. However, by investing in fundamental research, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can pave the way for the development of sustainable technologies that will ensure a thriving future for humanity and the planet.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »