Sustainable technology of 4930

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4930 ?

Sustainable technology in 4930 would likely be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. Here are some potential features:

Energy: Fusion power would be the primary source, providing clean and abundant energy. Solar and wind would still be used in some areas, but primarily for backup and specialized applications.
Transportation: Flying cars and high-speed maglev trains would be the norm, powered by fusion or advanced battery technology. Personal vehicles would be rare, and mostly for recreational use.
Manufacturing: Nanotechnology and 3D printing would allow for on-demand production of goods, with minimal waste and pollution. Factories would be highly automated and efficient.
Agriculture: Vertical farms and hydroponics would be used to grow food in urban areas, reducing the need for long-distance transportation. Genetically modified crops would be more resilient and nutritious.
Waste Management: Advanced recycling and waste-to-energy technologies would minimize landfill use. Most materials would be biodegradable or infinitely recyclable.
Communication: Neural interfaces and holographic displays would be commonplace, allowing for seamless communication and immersive experiences.
Healthcare: Advanced medical technologies would allow for early detection and treatment of diseases. Personalized medicine would be the norm, with treatments tailored to individual needs.
Environment: Climate change would be under control, with advanced geoengineering technologies used to regulate the Earth’s temperature and weather patterns. Pollution would be a thing of the past.

Overall, sustainable technology in 4930 would be characterized by its efficiency, abundance, and minimal impact on the environment. It would be a world where resources are used wisely and technology is used to enhance human life and protect the planet.

What is Sustainable technology of 4930 ?

Sustainable technology in 4930 would likely be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. Here are some potential features:

Energy: Fusion power would be the primary source, providing clean and abundant energy. Solar and wind would still be used in some areas, but primarily for backup and specialized applications.
Transportation: Flying cars and high-speed maglev trains would be the norm, powered by fusion or advanced battery technology. Personal vehicles would be rare, and mostly for recreational use.
Manufacturing: Nanotechnology and 3D printing would allow for on-demand production of goods, with minimal waste and pollution. Factories would be highly automated and efficient.
Agriculture: Vertical farms and hydroponics would be used to grow food in urban areas, reducing the need for long-distance transportation. Genetically modified crops would be more resilient and nutritious.
Waste Management: Advanced recycling and waste-to-energy technologies would minimize landfill use. Most materials would be biodegradable or infinitely recyclable.
Communication: Neural interfaces and holographic displays would be commonplace, allowing for seamless communication and immersive experiences.
Healthcare: Advanced medical technologies would allow for early detection and treatment of diseases. Personalized medicine would be the norm, with treatments tailored to individual needs.
Environment: Climate change would be under control, with advanced geoengineering technologies used to regulate the Earth’s temperature and weather patterns. Pollution would be a thing of the past.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4930 ?

In 4930, the need for sustainable technology would be universal. However, some groups would have a particularly strong reliance on it:

General Population: Everyone would rely on sustainable technology for basic needs like energy, food, transportation, and communication. The standard of living would be heavily dependent on the continued functioning and advancement of these technologies.
Scientists and Engineers: They would be responsible for developing, maintaining, and improving sustainable technologies. Their work would be crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of society.
Governments and Organizations: They would play a key role in regulating and promoting sustainable practices. They would also be responsible for managing resources and infrastructure.
Future Generations: They would inherit the world shaped by the sustainable technologies of 4930. Their well-being would depend on the responsible use and stewardship of these technologies.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 4930 would be the foundation of society, and everyone would have a stake in its success.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4930 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 4930 would be constant and ongoing. It wouldn’t be a one-time event, but rather a continuous requirement for the following reasons:

Resource Depletion: Even with advanced technology, resources are finite. Sustainable practices would be essential to ensure that resources are used efficiently and responsibly, preventing shortages and environmental damage.
Environmental Protection: Maintaining a healthy planet would be an ongoing challenge. Sustainable technology would be needed to mitigate the effects of pollution, climate change, and other environmental problems.
Population Growth: If the human population continues to grow, sustainable technology would be crucial for providing enough resources and infrastructure for everyone.
Technological Advancement: As technology advances, new challenges and opportunities would arise. Sustainable solutions would be needed to address these, ensuring that progress doesn’t come at the expense of the environment or future generations.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4930 would be an integral part of daily life, constantly needed to maintain a thriving society and a healthy planet.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4930 ?

Sustainable technology in 4930 would be needed everywhere! It would be the foundation upon which society functions. Here are some key areas where it would be essential:

Homes and Cities: Sustainable energy, waste management, and resource-efficient buildings would be crucial for comfortable and environmentally friendly living.
Transportation Systems: Sustainable transportation networks, including flying cars, maglev trains, and other advanced systems, would be necessary for efficient and eco-friendly travel.
Industrial and Manufacturing Sectors: Sustainable production methods, using nanotechnology, 3D printing, and closed-loop systems, would be essential for producing goods with minimal waste and pollution.
Agricultural and Food Production: Sustainable farming practices, such as vertical farms and hydroponics, would be needed to ensure food security while minimizing environmental impact.
Healthcare and Medical Facilities: Sustainable medical technologies, including advanced diagnostics and personalized treatments, would be crucial for maintaining public health.
Communication and Information Networks: Sustainable communication systems, potentially involving neural interfaces and holographic displays, would be needed for seamless and energy-efficient information exchange.
Environmental Management and Conservation: Sustainable technologies would be essential for monitoring and protecting the environment, including climate regulation, pollution control, and ecosystem preservation.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4930 would be woven into the fabric of everyday life, supporting all aspects of human activity and ensuring a healthy planet for future generations.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4930 ?

Sustainable technology in 4930 would be deeply integrated into society, not just as separate systems but as a cohesive and interconnected network. Here’s how it would likely function:

1. Seamless Integration: Sustainable technologies would be woven into the fabric of everyday life, becoming invisible infrastructure that supports all aspects of human activity. Think of it like electricity today – we don’t often think about how it’s generated and distributed, but we rely on it constantly.

2. Closed-Loop Systems: Many processes would operate on closed-loop principles, where waste is minimized and resources are reused. For example, manufacturing might rely on closed-loop material cycles, where materials are constantly recycled and repurposed.

3. Automation and AI: Artificial intelligence and automation would play a significant role in managing and optimizing sustainable technologies. AI could monitor energy grids, manage resource allocation, and even predict and prevent environmental problems.

4. Decentralization: While some large-scale infrastructure would still exist (like fusion power plants), there would likely be a trend towards decentralization. This could involve smaller-scale, localized systems for energy generation, food production, and waste management.

5. Adaptability and Resilience: Sustainable technologies would need to be adaptable and resilient to changing conditions. This could involve systems that can adjust to climate shifts, resource availability, and other challenges.

6. Continuous Improvement: The pursuit of sustainability would be an ongoing process. Technologies would constantly be improved and refined to become more efficient, less impactful, and better suited to the needs of society and the environment.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4930 would be a complex and interconnected system that supports a thriving society while minimizing its impact on the planet. It would be a testament to human ingenuity and our commitment to a sustainable future.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4930 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 4930, as that’s a fictional future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on the likely characteristics of such technologies. This will help illustrate how they might function and interact.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Neo-Alexandria Eco-City

Context: By 4930, coastal cities are largely protected by advanced sea defenses and often incorporate floating or submerged sections. Neo-Alexandria is a large, densely populated city relying entirely on sustainable technologies.

Focus: Integrated Resource Management within Neo-Alexandria.

Problem: Maintaining a high quality of life for a large population while minimizing environmental impact and ensuring resource availability.

Solution: Neo-Alexandria utilizes a multi-layered approach to sustainable resource management:

Energy: The city is powered by a nearby fusion power plant, supplemented by localized solar and wave energy collectors. Smart grids, managed by AI, optimize energy distribution and minimize waste. Energy storage solutions, like advanced batteries and pumped hydro, ensure grid stability.
Food: Vertical farms and hydroponic gardens within the city produce a significant portion of the food. These farms utilize recycled water and nutrients, and are illuminated by energy-efficient LEDs. Advanced genetic engineering ensures high yields and nutritional value. Aquaculture and lab-grown meat supplement the city’s protein needs.
Water: A closed-loop water system recycles and purifies all wastewater. Advanced filtration and desalination technologies ensure a constant supply of clean water. Rainwater harvesting is also widely implemented.
Waste: Waste is not considered “waste” but rather a resource. Automated sorting and processing facilities separate materials for recycling and reuse. Organic waste is composted and used to fertilize the vertical farms. Non-recyclable materials are converted into energy through advanced plasma gasification.
Transportation: Personal vehicles are rare. The city features a network of high-speed maglev trains and flying taxis powered by the city’s energy grid. Walking and cycling are encouraged through pedestrian-friendly urban design.
Materials: Nanotechnology is used to create durable, biodegradable materials. 3D printing allows for on-demand manufacturing, minimizing waste and transportation needs. Closed-loop material cycles ensure that resources are continuously reused.

Results:

Neo-Alexandria has a minimal carbon footprint.
Resource scarcity is largely eliminated.
The city is highly resilient to environmental changes.
The population enjoys a high quality of life with access to abundant resources and advanced technologies.

Conclusion:

This hypothetical case study demonstrates how a city in 4930 might achieve sustainability through the integration of advanced technologies and closed-loop systems. It highlights the importance of a holistic approach to resource management, where all aspects of urban life are considered and optimized for sustainability. While this is fictional, it provides a glimpse into the potential of sustainable technology in the future.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4930 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4930: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4930. It posits that by this distant future, sustainability will not be a separate concern but rather an intrinsic characteristic of all technological development and societal organization. We examine key areas where advancements are likely to occur, focusing on the interconnectedness of systems and the shift towards a closed-loop, resource-efficient paradigm. While speculative, this exploration aims to stimulate thought and inspire innovation towards a truly sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The challenges of the 21st century, including climate change, resource depletion, and pollution, necessitate a fundamental shift towards sustainable practices. By 4930, it is envisioned that humanity will have achieved a harmonious relationship with the planet, driven by technological advancements that prioritize environmental stewardship and resource efficiency. This white paper outlines a potential vision for this future, focusing on key technological domains.

2. Energy:

Fusion Power Dominance: Fusion energy, offering clean, abundant, and safe power, is expected to be the primary energy source. Advanced reactor designs and efficient energy conversion technologies will maximize energy output while minimizing waste.
Localized Renewable Integration: Solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable energy sources will continue to play a role, particularly in localized microgrids and specialized applications. Advanced energy storage solutions will ensure grid stability and reliability.
Wireless Energy Transmission: Efficient wireless power transfer may become a reality, allowing for the distribution of energy over vast distances with minimal loss.

3. Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Material Cycles: Manufacturing will rely on closed-loop systems where materials are continuously recycled and reused. Nanotechnology will enable the creation of durable, biodegradable, and infinitely recyclable materials.
Advanced Recycling and Resource Recovery: Highly efficient recycling technologies will recover valuable materials from waste streams, minimizing the need for raw material extraction. Waste-to-energy processes will convert non-recyclable materials into usable energy.
Resource Optimization through AI: Artificial intelligence will play a critical role in optimizing resource allocation and consumption. AI-powered systems will monitor resource flows, predict demand, and identify opportunities for efficiency improvements.

4. Food Production:

Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Vertical farms and other controlled environment agriculture systems will be widely adopted, maximizing food production while minimizing land use and water consumption.
Precision Agriculture and Biotechnology: Precision agriculture techniques, combined with advanced biotechnology, will optimize crop yields and enhance nutritional value. Genetically modified crops will be designed for resilience and sustainability.
Sustainable Aquaculture and Alternative Proteins: Sustainable aquaculture practices and the development of alternative protein sources, such as lab-grown meat and insect-based protein, will reduce pressure on traditional agriculture.

5. Transportation:

Advanced Transportation Networks: High-speed maglev trains, flying vehicles, and other advanced transportation systems will facilitate efficient and sustainable movement of people and goods.
Electric and Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Personal vehicles will be predominantly electric or powered by other sustainable fuels. Advanced battery technologies will provide long ranges and fast charging times.
Smart Traffic Management Systems: AI-powered traffic management systems will optimize traffic flow, reducing congestion and fuel consumption.

6. Environmental Management:

Geoengineering and Climate Regulation: Advanced geoengineering technologies may be used to mitigate the effects of climate change and regulate the Earth’s climate.
Pollution Control and Remediation: Highly effective pollution control technologies will prevent and remediate pollution of air, water, and soil.
Ecosystem Restoration and Preservation: Advanced ecological restoration techniques will be used to restore damaged ecosystems and preserve biodiversity.

7. Healthcare and Wellbeing:

Personalized Medicine and Advanced Diagnostics: Personalized medicine and advanced diagnostic technologies will enable early detection and treatment of diseases.
Biotechnology and Regenerative Medicine: Advances in biotechnology and regenerative medicine will extend lifespans and improve quality of life.
Mental and Social Wellbeing: Sustainable technologies will also contribute to mental and social wellbeing by creating healthier and more connected communities.

8. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 4930 presented in this white paper is ambitious but achievable. By embracing innovation, prioritizing environmental stewardship, and fostering global collaboration, humanity can create a future where technology and sustainability are inextricably linked, ensuring a thriving planet for generations to come. This future requires a paradigm shift in our thinking, moving away from a linear, resource-depleting model to a circular, regenerative one. The journey towards this future begins today.

Inudstrial application of Sustainable technology of 4930 ?

You’re right to ask about industrial applications! In 4930, sustainable technology wouldn’t just be for homes and transportation. Industry would be completely transformed by it. Here are some key areas:

1. Manufacturing:

Nanotechnology & 3D Printing: Imagine factories where everything is built on demand using these technologies. This means minimal waste, as materials are used precisely. Products could even be customized at the molecular level!
Closed-Loop Production: Factories would operate on closed-loop systems. Raw materials are processed, used, and then recycled endlessly within the factory itself. No more waste streams polluting the environment.
AI-Powered Optimization: Artificial intelligence would manage every aspect of the manufacturing process, from design to production to maintenance. This ensures maximum efficiency and minimal resource use.

2. Energy-Intensive Industries:

Fusion-Powered Smelting: Industries like steel and aluminum production, which currently require massive amounts of energy, would be powered by clean fusion energy. This drastically reduces their environmental impact.
Carbon Capture & Utilization: Even with clean energy, some industries might still produce some emissions. Advanced carbon capture technologies would capture this CO2 and convert it into useful products like fuels or building materials.

3. Resource Extraction:

Sustainable Mining: Mining operations would be far less destructive. Advanced robotics and AI could be used to extract resources with minimal impact on the surrounding environment.
Resource Regeneration: Technologies might even exist to regenerate certain resources, like rare earth minerals, from waste or other sources, reducing the need for continuous extraction.

4. Agriculture & Food Production:

Vertical Farms & Automated Greenhouses: Large-scale vertical farms and automated greenhouses would be commonplace, producing food efficiently in urban areas. These would use recycled water and nutrients, and be powered by renewable energy.
Precision Agriculture: In traditional agriculture, sensors and AI would be used to optimize irrigation, fertilization, and pest control, minimizing resource use and environmental impact.

5. Waste Management:

Waste-to-Energy & Resource Recovery: Advanced facilities would not only convert waste into energy but also extract valuable materials for reuse. Landfills would be a thing of the past.
Biodegradable Materials: Industry would rely heavily on biodegradable materials, ensuring that any waste that does end up in the environment decomposes naturally.

Overall Impact:

Reduced Environmental Footprint: Industry would have a minimal impact on the environment, with drastically reduced emissions, waste, and resource depletion.
Increased Efficiency: Processes would be highly optimized, leading to greater productivity and resource efficiency.
Circular Economy: The industrial system would operate on a circular economy model, where resources are continuously reused and recycled.

It’s important to remember that this is a vision of the future. But by focusing on sustainable technology and innovation, we can make this vision a reality.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4930 ?

Research and development (R&D) in sustainable technology for a future like 4930 would be a massive, multifaceted undertaking. It wouldn’t be confined to single disciplines but would require deep interdisciplinary collaboration. Here’s a breakdown of potential R&D areas:

1. Fundamental Sciences:

Advanced Materials Science: Creating new materials with specific properties (strength, lightness, biodegradability, superconductivity) would be crucial. This could involve nanotechnology, metamaterials, and bio-engineered materials.
Quantum Computing: Quantum computers could revolutionize materials discovery, simulations, and AI development, accelerating the search for sustainable solutions.
Fundamental Physics: Further exploration of physics, particularly in areas like fusion energy and advanced propulsion, could unlock new sustainable energy sources and transportation methods.

2. Energy:

Fusion Energy Optimization: Continued research into fusion reactor design, plasma confinement, and energy extraction would be essential for making fusion a practical and widespread energy source.
Advanced Energy Storage: Developing more efficient and compact energy storage solutions, like advanced batteries or other novel methods, would be crucial for grid stability and the use of intermittent renewable energy sources.
Wireless Energy Transmission: Research into efficient and safe wireless energy transmission could revolutionize energy distribution and reduce reliance on physical grids.

3. Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Developing closed-loop systems for various industries would require research in materials processing, recycling technologies, and AI-driven optimization.
Resource Regeneration: Exploring methods for regenerating resources, such as rare earth minerals or other critical materials, would be a game-changer.
AI for Resource Management: Developing AI systems that can effectively manage and optimize resource allocation, consumption, and recycling would be essential.

4. Food Production:

Advanced Plant Biology: Research in plant biology and genetics would be crucial for developing crops that are more resilient, nutritious, and efficient at resource use.
Controlled Environment Agriculture: Optimizing vertical farming and other controlled environment agriculture systems would require research in lighting, climate control, nutrient delivery, and automation.
Alternative Protein Sources: Developing scalable and sustainable methods for producing alternative proteins, such as lab-grown meat or insect-based protein, would be vital.

5. Environmental Science:

Climate Modeling and Prediction: Improving climate models and prediction capabilities would be crucial for understanding and mitigating the effects of climate change.
Geoengineering Research: Careful and controlled research into geoengineering techniques would be necessary to assess their potential for climate regulation.
Ecosystem Restoration: Developing advanced ecological restoration techniques would be essential for repairing damaged ecosystems and preserving biodiversity.

6. Social Sciences and Policy:

Sustainable Development Models: Developing models for sustainable development that consider social, economic, and environmental factors would be crucial.
Policy and Governance: Research into effective policies and governance structures for promoting sustainable practices would be essential.
Behavioral Science: Understanding and influencing human behavior related to resource consumption and sustainability would be important.

7. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Systems Thinking: Promoting systems thinking and interdisciplinary collaboration would be essential for addressing the complex challenges of sustainability.
Knowledge Sharing: Facilitating knowledge sharing and collaboration among researchers, policymakers, and the public would be crucial for accelerating progress.

It’s important to understand that these areas are interconnected. Progress in one area can often lead to breakthroughs in others. For example, advancements in AI could accelerate materials discovery, which could then lead to more efficient energy storage solutions. This interconnectedness highlights the importance of a holistic and integrated approach to R&D in sustainable technology.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.