Sustainable technology of 4120

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4120 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, here are some potential trends in sustainable technology by 4120, based on current developments and foreseeable needs:

1. Advanced Energy Systems:

Fusion Power: If achieved, fusion would provide clean, abundant energy, potentially powering entire cities or even space colonies.
Space-Based Solar: Harnessing solar energy from space would offer a continuous, inexhaustible source, unaffected by weather or day/night cycles.
Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Breakthroughs in materials science could lead to energy storage solutions with vastly higher densities and efficiencies.
Wireless Energy Transmission: Large-scale wireless power transfer could revolutionize energy distribution, making power grids obsolete.

2. Resource Management:

Advanced Recycling & Material Recovery: Technologies could achieve near-total resource recovery from waste, creating a circular economy.
Asteroid Mining: Extracting resources from asteroids could provide access to rare minerals and reduce reliance on Earth’s finite resources.
Vertical Farming & Controlled Environment Agriculture: Indoor farms and vertical structures could optimize food production in urban areas, reducing land and water usage.
Desalination & Water Purification: Advanced filtration and purification systems could provide clean water even in arid regions.

3. Environmental Restoration:

Climate Engineering: Techniques like carbon capture and solar radiation management could be deployed to mitigate climate change effects.
Ocean Cleanup & Restoration: Advanced robotics and nanotechnology could be used to remove pollutants and restore marine ecosystems.
Reforestation & Habitat Restoration: Drones and AI could automate large-scale reforestation efforts and restore damaged habitats.

4. Sustainable Manufacturing:

Nanotechnology & 3D Printing: Atomically precise manufacturing could create materials with unprecedented properties and enable on-demand production of goods.
Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems could produce biofuels, bioplastics, and other sustainable materials.
Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Factories could operate with minimal waste, recycling all materials and byproducts.

5. Smart Cities & Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Infrastructure: Materials with built-in repair mechanisms could extend the lifespan of roads, bridges, and buildings.
Smart Grids & Energy Management: AI-powered systems could optimize energy distribution and usage in real-time.
Autonomous Transportation: Self-driving vehicles and flying cars could reduce traffic congestion and pollution.

6. Space Colonization:

Self-Sustaining Habitats: Closed-loop ecosystems could provide food, water, and air for long-term space missions and settlements.
Terraforming: Advanced technologies might enable the transformation of other planets into habitable environments.

7. Ethical Considerations:

AI Governance: Regulations and ethical frameworks would be needed to ensure responsible development and use of AI.
Resource Equity: International cooperation would be crucial to ensure equitable access to resources and technologies.
Planetary Protection: Measures would be needed to protect extraterrestrial environments from contamination.

8. Challenges:

Technological Feasibility: Many of these technologies are still in early stages of development and may face unforeseen challenges.
Economic Viability: The cost of developing and deploying these technologies could be prohibitive.
Social Acceptance: Public perception and adoption of new technologies could be a barrier.

9. Conclusion:

By 4120, sustainable technology could have transformed human civilization, enabling us to live in harmony with nature and expand our presence in the universe. However, achieving this vision will require significant advancements in science and technology, as well as careful consideration of ethical and social implications.

What is Sustainable technology of 4120 ?

It’s fascinating to speculate about sustainable technology in 4120! While we can’t predict the future with certainty, we can extrapolate from current trends and imagine the possibilities. Here are some potential developments in sustainable technology by 4120:

1. Energy:

Fusion Power: If humanity manages to harness fusion, it could become the primary energy source, providing clean and abundant power for everyone.
Space-Based Solar: Imagine solar farms in space, continuously beaming energy to Earth. This could provide a limitless supply of clean energy, unaffected by weather or day/night cycles.
Advanced Energy Storage: We might see revolutionary energy storage solutions with incredible density and efficiency, making it possible to store vast amounts of energy for use as needed.
Wireless Energy Transmission: Perhaps energy could be transmitted wirelessly over long distances, making power grids obsolete and allowing for easy energy access anywhere in the world.

2. Resource Management:

Near-Perfect Recycling: Technologies could be developed to achieve almost complete resource recovery from waste, creating a truly circular economy with minimal waste.
Asteroid Mining: Extracting resources from asteroids could become commonplace, providing access to rare minerals and reducing our reliance on Earth’s finite resources.
Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Food production could move into highly efficient indoor farms and vertical structures, optimizing land and water use, especially in urban areas.
Advanced Desalination and Water Purification: Clean water could become readily available even in arid regions, thanks to advanced filtration and purification systems.

3. Environmental Restoration:

Climate Engineering: Techniques like carbon capture and solar radiation management might be deployed to actively counteract the effects of climate change.
Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Advanced robotics and nanotechnology could be used to remove pollutants and restore marine ecosystems to their former health.
Large-Scale Reforestation and Habitat Restoration: Drones and AI could automate reforestation efforts and restore damaged habitats on a massive scale.

4. Sustainable Manufacturing:

Nanotechnology and 3D Printing: Atomically precise manufacturing could create materials with incredible properties and enable on-demand production of goods, reducing waste and transportation needs.
Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems could produce biofuels, bioplastics, and other sustainable materials, reducing our dependence on fossil fuels and traditional manufacturing processes.
Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Factories could operate with minimal waste, recycling all materials and byproducts within the production process.

5. Smart Cities and Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Infrastructure: Materials with built-in repair mechanisms could extend the lifespan of roads, bridges, and buildings, reducing maintenance needs and resource consumption.
Smart Grids and Energy Management: AI-powered systems could optimize energy distribution and usage in real-time, improving efficiency and reducing waste.
Autonomous Transportation: Self-driving vehicles and flying cars could become the norm, reducing traffic congestion and pollution.

6. Space Colonization:

Self-Sustaining Habitats: Closed-loop ecosystems could provide food, water, and air for long-term space missions and settlements, making space colonization more feasible.
Terraforming: Perhaps technologies could be developed to transform other planets into habitable environments, expanding humanity’s reach in the universe.

7. Ethical Considerations:

AI Governance: As AI becomes more advanced, strong regulations and ethical frameworks would be essential to ensure its responsible development and use.
Resource Equity: International cooperation would be crucial to ensure fair access to resources and technologies for all of humanity.
Planetary Protection: Measures would be needed to protect extraterrestrial environments from contamination as we explore and potentially colonize other planets.

Challenges:

Technological Feasibility: Many of these technologies are still in their early stages and may face unforeseen challenges in their development.
Economic Viability: The cost of developing and deploying these technologies could be significant.
Social Acceptance: Public perception and adoption of new technologies could be a barrier to their widespread implementation.

Conclusion:

By 4120, sustainable technology could have revolutionized human civilization, allowing us to live in harmony with nature and expand our presence in the universe. However, achieving this future will require significant advancements in science and technology, as well as careful consideration of the ethical and social implications of these developments.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4120 ?

It’s not a matter of who requires sustainable technology in 4120, but rather that sustainable technology will be essential for the continued survival and prosperity of human civilization by that time. Here’s why:

Resource Depletion: By 4120, Earth’s natural resources may be significantly depleted due to centuries of consumption. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for managing remaining resources efficiently and finding alternative sources.
Climate Change Impacts: The long-term effects of climate change could be severe by 4120. Sustainable technologies will be needed to mitigate these effects, adapt to changing conditions, and potentially even reverse some of the damage.
Population Growth: If the human population continues to grow, sustainable technologies will be necessary to provide food, water, energy, and shelter for everyone.
Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and other forms of environmental degradation will need to be addressed through sustainable solutions to maintain a healthy planet.
Space Exploration and Colonization: If humanity expands into space, sustainable technologies will be essential for creating self-sustaining habitats and utilizing extraterrestrial resources.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4120 will be a necessity for:

Ensuring the long-term survival of humanity.
Maintaining a healthy planet for future generations.
Providing a high quality of life for all people.
Enabling further exploration and expansion beyond Earth.

It’s not about specific groups requiring sustainable technology, but rather about humanity as a whole needing it to thrive in the face of potential challenges and to create a better future.

COURTESY : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4120 ?

Sustainable technology in 4120 will be required in a multitude of places, essentially anywhere human activity occurs. Here are some key areas:

1. Urban Centers and Habitations:

Homes and Buildings: Self-healing materials, smart energy management systems, and efficient resource utilization will be essential in homes and buildings to minimize environmental impact.
Transportation Systems: Sustainable transportation will be crucial in cities, with autonomous vehicles, flying cars, and advanced public transit systems reducing congestion and pollution.
Infrastructure: Smart grids, self-healing infrastructure, and advanced waste management systems will be necessary to support sustainable urban living.

2. Rural and Agricultural Areas:

Farming and Food Production: Vertical farms, controlled environment agriculture, and precision farming techniques will be needed to maximize food production while minimizing land and water usage.
Resource Management: Sustainable forestry practices, water conservation techniques, and ecosystem restoration will be crucial in rural areas.

3. Industrial and Manufacturing Sectors:

Factories and Production Facilities: Closed-loop manufacturing, nanotechnology, and synthetic biology will enable sustainable production of goods with minimal waste and environmental impact.
Energy Production: Fusion power plants, space-based solar farms, and other advanced energy systems will provide clean and abundant energy for industries.

4. Space and Extraterrestrial Environments:

Space Habitats: Self-sustaining ecosystems and closed-loop life support systems will be essential for long-term space missions and settlements.
Asteroid Mining and Resource Extraction: Sustainable technologies will be needed to extract resources from asteroids and other celestial bodies with minimal environmental impact.
Terraforming and Planetary Engineering: If humanity undertakes terraforming efforts, sustainable technologies will be crucial for creating habitable environments on other planets.

5. Global and Planetary Systems:

Climate Engineering: Techniques for carbon capture, solar radiation management, and other climate engineering approaches may be deployed on a global scale to mitigate climate change.
Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Advanced robotics and nanotechnology could be used to remove pollutants and restore marine ecosystems worldwide.
Environmental Monitoring and Management: Global monitoring systems and AI-powered tools will be needed to track environmental changes and manage resources sustainably.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4120 will be required wherever humans live, work, and interact with the environment, both on Earth and beyond. It will be an integral part of everyday life, enabling humanity to thrive while minimizing its impact on the planet and expanding its presence in the universe.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4120 ?

Sustainable technology in 4120 will be required in a multitude of ways, woven into the fabric of daily life and essential for addressing the challenges of that era. Here’s how it will be required:

1. As a Foundation for Survival:

Resource Management: With potential resource scarcity, sustainable tech will be crucial for efficient resource utilization, recycling, and finding alternatives.
Climate Change Mitigation: To combat the long-term effects of climate change, sustainable technologies will be needed for adaptation, mitigation, and potentially even reversing some of the damage.
Population Support: If the population continues to grow, sustainable tech will be essential to provide everyone with food, water, energy, and shelter.
Environmental Health: Sustainable solutions will be necessary to address pollution, deforestation, and other forms of environmental degradation to maintain a healthy planet.

2. As a Driver of Progress:

Economic Growth: Sustainable technologies can create new industries, jobs, and economic opportunities, driving progress in a way that doesn’t harm the environment.
Technological Advancement: Continued innovation in sustainable tech will be essential for developing new solutions to emerging challenges and improving quality of life.
Space Exploration: If humanity expands into space, sustainable technologies will be crucial for creating self-sustaining habitats and utilizing extraterrestrial resources.

3. As a Matter of Ethics and Responsibility:

Intergenerational Equity: Sustainable technology will be needed to ensure that future generations have access to the resources and a healthy environment they need to thrive.
Environmental Stewardship: Sustainable practices will be essential for protecting the planet’s ecosystems and biodiversity.
Social Justice: Sustainable technologies should be developed and deployed in a way that benefits all of humanity, not just a select few.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4120 will be required:

To ensure the long-term survival and well-being of humanity.
To drive progress and innovation in a responsible way.
To uphold ethical principles of environmental stewardship and social justice.

It won’t be a matter of simply having sustainable technology available, but rather it will be deeply integrated into how society functions, ensuring a harmonious relationship between humanity and the planet, both on Earth and beyond.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4120 ?

It’s tricky to create a specific case study for sustainable technology in 4120, as it involves a lot of speculation. However, we can build a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and potential advancements:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Aral Sea Basin in 4120

Background: By the early 21st century, the Aral Sea, once the world’s fourth-largest lake, had largely disappeared due to unsustainable water diversion for agriculture. This resulted in a massive ecological disaster, with desertification, salt storms, and severe impacts on local communities.

The Challenge: In 4120, the challenge is not just to restore the Aral Sea, but to create a thriving, sustainable ecosystem in the region, supporting both human populations and biodiversity.

The Solution: A multi-faceted approach utilizing advanced sustainable technologies:

Atmospheric Water Generation: Large-scale atmospheric water generators, powered by space-based solar energy, extract moisture from the air to replenish the Aral Sea and surrounding water bodies. These generators utilize advanced nanotechnology to maximize efficiency and minimize energy consumption.
Advanced Desalination and Water Purification: Utilizing highly efficient desalination plants powered by fusion energy, saltwater from the remaining sea and underground aquifers is purified for irrigation and drinking water.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors, AI, and robotics enable precision agriculture in the region. Crops are selected for drought resistance and salt tolerance. Water usage is optimized through targeted irrigation, minimizing waste and preventing further depletion of water resources.
Ecosystem Restoration: Drones and AI-powered systems are used to reforest the region with native, drought-resistant vegetation. Genetically engineered microbes are deployed to break down pollutants and restore soil health.
Sustainable Energy Grid: A smart grid powered by a combination of space-based solar, fusion energy, and localized renewable sources (wind, geothermal) provides clean energy for all human activities in the region.
Circular Economy: Closed-loop manufacturing and advanced recycling technologies ensure that resources are used efficiently and waste is minimized. Bioplastics and other sustainable materials are used in construction and everyday products.
Community Involvement: Local communities are actively involved in the restoration and management of the Aral Sea basin. Education programs focus on sustainable practices and environmental stewardship.

Outcomes:

The Aral Sea is partially restored, supporting a diverse ecosystem and providing a source of livelihood for local communities.
The region becomes a hub for sustainable agriculture, producing food for both local consumption and export.
The environment is revitalized, with improved air and water quality, and restored biodiversity.
Local communities thrive with access to clean water, sustainable energy, and economic opportunities.

Lessons Learned:

This case study demonstrates the potential of sustainable technology to reverse environmental damage and create a thriving future.
It highlights the importance of a holistic approach, integrating multiple technologies and considering social and economic factors.
It emphasizes the crucial role of community involvement and environmental stewardship in achieving long-term sustainability.

While this is a fictional scenario, it illustrates how sustainable technology in 4120 could be essential for solving complex environmental challenges and creating a better future for humanity.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4120 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4120 – A Vision for Humanity’s Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4120, extrapolating from current trends and envisioning the solutions humanity might employ to address the long-term challenges of resource management, climate change, and sustainable development. It examines key technological advancements across various sectors, highlighting their potential impact on the environment, society, and the future of civilization.

1. Introduction:

The year 4120 represents a significant milestone in human history, a point where the choices made in the intervening centuries will have shaped the planet and our civilization profoundly. This paper posits that sustainable technology will be not just a desirable option, but a fundamental necessity for human survival and prosperity. We explore potential technological breakthroughs and their application in creating a sustainable future.

2. Energy:

Fusion Power: The realization of commercially viable fusion power offers the potential for clean, abundant, and virtually limitless energy. By 4120, fusion reactors could be the primary energy source, powering cities, industries, and even space colonies.
Space-Based Solar Power: Harnessing solar energy from space, where sunlight is uninterrupted by weather or atmospheric interference, could provide a continuous and highly efficient energy source. Advanced transmission technologies would beam this energy to Earth.
Advanced Energy Storage: Nanomaterials and other breakthroughs could lead to energy storage solutions with vastly higher densities and efficiencies, enabling widespread use of renewable energy sources and facilitating energy independence.
Wireless Energy Transmission: Long-distance wireless power transfer could revolutionize energy distribution, eliminating the need for traditional power grids and enabling access to energy in even the most remote locations.

3. Resource Management:

Near-Perfect Recycling and Material Recovery: Advanced recycling technologies, potentially involving nanotechnology and AI-driven sorting systems, could achieve near-total resource recovery from waste, creating a circular economy where resources are continuously reused.
Asteroid Mining: Extracting resources from asteroids and other celestial bodies could provide access to rare minerals and reduce our reliance on Earth’s finite resources, minimizing environmental impact.
Sustainable Agriculture: Vertical farming, hydroponics, and other controlled-environment agriculture techniques, combined with precision farming practices, could maximize food production while minimizing land and water usage.
Water Management: Advanced desalination and water purification technologies, powered by sustainable energy sources, could ensure access to clean water even in arid regions. Atmospheric water generation might also play a significant role.

4. Environmental Restoration:

Climate Engineering: Advanced climate engineering techniques, such as carbon capture and sequestration, solar radiation management, and cloud seeding, could be deployed to mitigate the effects of climate change and potentially even reverse some of the damage.
Ecosystem Restoration: AI-powered drones and robotics could be used to reforest degraded areas, restore damaged ecosystems, and monitor environmental health. Synthetic biology could play a role in bioremediation and pollution control.
Ocean Cleanup: Nanotechnology and advanced robotics could be used to remove pollutants from the oceans and restore marine ecosystems.

5. Sustainable Manufacturing:

Nanotechnology and 3D Printing: Atomically precise manufacturing could enable the creation of materials with unprecedented properties and allow for on-demand production of goods, minimizing waste and transportation needs.
Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems could produce biofuels, bioplastics, and other sustainable materials, reducing our dependence on fossil fuels and traditional manufacturing processes.
Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Factories could operate with minimal waste, recycling all materials and byproducts within the production process.

6. Smart Cities and Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Infrastructure: Materials with built-in repair mechanisms could extend the lifespan of roads, bridges, and buildings, reducing maintenance needs and resource consumption.
Smart Grids and Energy Management: AI-powered systems could optimize energy distribution and usage in real-time, improving efficiency and reducing waste.
Sustainable Transportation: Autonomous vehicles, flying cars, and advanced public transit systems could reduce traffic congestion and pollution.

7. Space Colonization and Extraterrestrial Resource Utilization:

Self-Sustaining Habitats: Closed-loop ecosystems could provide food, water, and air for long-term space missions and settlements.
Terraforming: Advanced technologies might enable the transformation of other planets into habitable environments.

8. Ethical and Societal Considerations:

AI Governance: Robust ethical frameworks and regulations will be essential to ensure the responsible development and use of AI.
Resource Equity: International cooperation will be crucial to ensure equitable access to resources and technologies.
Planetary Protection: Measures will be needed to protect extraterrestrial environments from contamination.

9. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 4120 presented in this white paper is ambitious, yet achievable. Realizing this future will require sustained investment in research and development, international collaboration, and a commitment to ethical and responsible innovation. By embracing sustainable technologies, humanity can create a future where both our civilization and the planet thrive.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4120 ?

You’re right to ask about the industrial applications! Sustainable technology in 4120 won’t just be about individual actions, but massive shifts in how we produce and consume. Here are some key industrial applications:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

Nanofactories: Imagine factories at the atomic level. Nanotechnology could allow for the creation of materials and products with incredible precision and minimal waste. This would revolutionize manufacturing, allowing for on-demand production of highly customized goods.
Synthetic Biology for Materials: Industries could utilize engineered biological systems to produce bioplastics, biofuels, and other sustainable materials. This would reduce reliance on fossil fuels and traditional chemical manufacturing, leading to a more environmentally friendly production process.
Closed-Loop Production: Factories would operate with minimal waste, recycling all materials and byproducts within the production cycle. This would create a circular economy, where resources are used efficiently and pollution is minimized.
3D Printing at Scale: Advanced 3D printing could be used to create everything from buildings to complex machinery, reducing waste and enabling on-site manufacturing, even in remote locations.

2. Energy Generation & Distribution:

Fusion Power Plants: Industries would be powered by clean and abundant fusion energy, providing a sustainable source for manufacturing processes, transportation, and other energy-intensive activities.
Space-Based Solar for Industry: Energy beamed from space-based solar farms could provide a continuous and reliable power source for industries, regardless of weather conditions or time of day.
Wireless Energy for Remote Operations: Wireless energy transmission could power industrial operations in remote locations, such as mining or resource extraction in space, without the need for traditional power grids.

3. Resource Extraction & Processing:

Sustainable Mining: Advanced robotics and AI could be used to extract resources from mines with minimal environmental impact, reducing waste and restoring ecosystems after mining operations are complete.
Asteroid Mining: Industries could utilize sustainable technologies to extract valuable resources from asteroids and other celestial bodies, providing access to rare minerals and reducing reliance on Earth’s finite resources.
Advanced Recycling & Resource Recovery: Industries would utilize advanced recycling technologies to recover valuable materials from waste streams, creating a circular economy and minimizing the need for new resource extraction.

4. Transportation & Logistics:

Autonomous Fleets: Self-driving vehicles and flying vehicles could revolutionize transportation and logistics, reducing fuel consumption, traffic congestion, and pollution.
Sustainable Shipping: Advanced biofuels and electric propulsion systems could be used to power cargo ships and aircraft, reducing the environmental impact of global trade.
Hyperloop Systems: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops could enable rapid and efficient movement of goods and people between cities and industrial centers, reducing travel times and energy consumption.

5. Construction & Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be constructed from self-healing materials that can repair themselves, reducing maintenance needs and extending their lifespan.
Modular Construction: Prefabricated and modular construction techniques could be used to create buildings and infrastructure more efficiently and sustainably, reducing waste and construction time.
Smart Infrastructure: AI-powered systems could monitor and manage infrastructure in real-time, optimizing energy usage and preventing failures.

6. Agriculture & Food Production:

Vertical Farms & Controlled Environment Agriculture: Industries could utilize vertical farms and other controlled environment agriculture techniques to produce food in urban areas and other locations where land is scarce, reducing transportation needs and environmental impact.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors, AI, and robotics could be used to optimize crop yields and minimize water and fertilizer usage, creating a more sustainable agricultural system.
Sustainable Food Processing: Industries could utilize sustainable technologies to process and package food, reducing waste and minimizing environmental impact.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could be applied in various industries by 4120. The key takeaway is that sustainability would be deeply integrated into all aspects of industrial activity, driving innovation, reducing environmental impact, and creating a more prosperous and equitable future.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4120 ?

Research and development (R&D) in sustainable technology for 4120 would be a massive, ongoing, and likely highly interdisciplinary endeavor. It’s impossible to detail every avenue, but here are some key areas of focus:

1. Fundamental Science & Materials Research:

Advanced Materials: Discovering and engineering new materials with unprecedented properties (superconductivity at room temperature, extreme strength-to-weight ratios, self-healing capabilities, etc.) will be crucial for many sustainable technologies. Nanotechnology, metamaterials, and biomimicry will likely play significant roles.
Quantum Computing & AI: Continued advancements in quantum computing and AI will be essential for modeling complex systems (climate, ecosystems, material behavior), optimizing designs, and controlling advanced technologies with greater precision.
Fundamental Physics: Continued exploration of fundamental physics could lead to breakthroughs in energy generation (fusion, zero-point energy), propulsion, and even our understanding of gravity, potentially opening up entirely new avenues for sustainable technology.
Synthetic Biology: Further research into synthetic biology will be critical for engineering biological systems to produce biofuels, bioplastics, medicines, and other sustainable products. Ethical considerations and safety protocols will be paramount.

2. Energy Technologies:

Fusion Energy: Achieving commercially viable fusion power will require significant R&D in plasma physics, materials science, and reactor design.
Space-Based Solar: Developing efficient and cost-effective methods for transmitting energy from space to Earth will require breakthroughs in wireless power transmission, high-power lasers, and space-based infrastructure.
Advanced Energy Storage: Research into new battery chemistries, supercapacitors, and other energy storage technologies will be essential for enabling widespread use of renewable energy sources.
Direct Energy Conversion: Exploring and refining methods for converting energy directly from natural sources (solar, geothermal, etc.) into usable forms could lead to more efficient and sustainable energy systems.

3. Resource Management & Environmental Science:

Advanced Recycling: Developing technologies for near-perfect recycling and resource recovery will require research in materials science, chemistry, and AI-driven sorting systems.
Carbon Capture & Sequestration: Research into more efficient and cost-effective methods for capturing and storing carbon dioxide will be essential for mitigating climate change.
Climate Engineering: Investigating and developing safe and effective climate engineering techniques will require a deep understanding of atmospheric science, oceanography, and other Earth systems.
Ecosystem Restoration: Research into ecological principles and restoration techniques will be crucial for revitalizing damaged ecosystems and preserving biodiversity.

4. Manufacturing & Industrial Processes:

Nanofabrication: Developing methods for atomically precise manufacturing will require significant advances in nanotechnology, robotics, and control systems.
Biomanufacturing: Research into using biological systems for manufacturing will require expertise in synthetic biology, metabolic engineering, and bioprocess engineering.
Closed-Loop Systems: Designing and implementing closed-loop manufacturing systems will require interdisciplinary collaboration between engineers, chemists, and environmental scientists.

5. Smart Cities & Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Developing self-healing materials will require research in materials science, chemistry, and nanotechnology.
Smart Grids & Energy Management: Research in AI, machine learning, and control systems will be essential for developing smart grids that can optimize energy distribution and usage.
Autonomous Systems: Continued development of autonomous vehicles, robotics, and AI will be crucial for creating sustainable transportation systems and smart infrastructure.

6. Space Exploration & Colonization:

Closed-Loop Life Support Systems: Research into closed-loop ecosystems and bioregenerative life support systems will be essential for long-term space missions and settlements.
Terraforming: Investigating the feasibility of terraforming other planets will require a deep understanding of planetary science, atmospheric science, and other related fields.
In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): Developing technologies for extracting and utilizing resources from extraterrestrial environments will be crucial for space colonization and exploration.

7. Social Sciences & Ethics:

Technology Assessment: Research into the social, ethical, and environmental implications of new technologies will be essential for guiding their development and deployment.
Policy & Governance: Developing effective policies and regulations for managing sustainable technologies will require collaboration between scientists, policymakers, and ethicists.
Public Engagement: Communicating the benefits and risks of sustainable technologies to the public will be crucial for ensuring their widespread adoption.

This interconnected R&D effort would require global collaboration, significant funding, and a long-term perspective. It would be a continuous process of discovery, innovation, and refinement, pushing the boundaries of human knowledge and capability to create a truly sustainable future.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 5–6.
^ Zhang, Wei; Li, Binshuai; Xue, Rui; Wang, Chengcheng; Cao, Wei (2021). “A systematic bibliometric review of clean energy transition: Implications for low-carbon development”. PLOS ONE. 16 (12): e0261091. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1661091Z. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261091. PMC 8641874. PMID 34860855.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 5.
^ “Definitions: energy, sustainability and the future”. OpenLearn. The Open University. Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
^ Golus̆in, Popov & Dodić 2013, p. 8.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Hammond, Geoffrey P.; Jones, Craig I. “Sustainability criteria for energy resources and technologies”. In Galarraga, González-Eguino & Markandya (2011), pp. 21–47.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNECE 2020, pp. 3–4.
^ Gunnarsdottir, I.; Davidsdottir, B.; Worrell, E.; Sigurgeirsdottir, S. (May 2021). “Sustainable energy development: History of the concept and emerging themes”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110770. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110770G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110770. hdl:1874/411740.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 1–2.
^ Vera, Ivan; Langlois, Lucille (2007). “Energy indicators for sustainable development”. Energy. 32 (6): 875–882. Bibcode:2007Ene….32..875V. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.006.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 3–5.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2021). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 15 January 2024. Data sources: Markandya & Wilkinson (2007); UNSCEAR (2008; 2018); Sovacool et al. (2016); IPCC AR5 (2014); Pehl et al. (2017); Ember Energy (2021).
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 46.
^ “Global Historical Emissions”. Climate Watch. Archived from the original on 4 June 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (August 2021). “4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors”. World Resources Institute. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ “The Paris Agreement”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 19 March 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; et al. (2021). “The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises” (PDF). The Lancet. 397 (10269): 151. Bibcode:2021Lanc..397..129W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X. PMC 7616803. PMID 33278353.
^ “Every breath you take: The staggering, true cost of air pollution”. United Nations Development Programme. 4 June 2019. Archived from the original on 20 April 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
^ “New WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines aim to save millions of lives from air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 23 September 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ “Acid Rain and Water”. United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 27 June 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2018, p. 16.
^ “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 8 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2019). “Access to Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2016, pp. vii–xiv.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 118.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 470–472.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 504.
^ Kessides, Ioannis N.; Toman, Michael (28 July 2011). “The Global Energy Challenge”. World Bank. Archived from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
^ Morris et al. 2015, pp. 24–27.
^ “Access to clean cooking”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. October 2020. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
^ IEA 2021, p. 167.
^ Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu (20 July 2022). “Winners and losers of energy sustainability—Global assessment of the Sustainable Development Goals”. Science of the Total Environment. 831. 154945. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83154945S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154945. hdl:11250/3023660. PMID 35367559.
^ Deputy Secretary-General (6 June 2018). “Sustainable Development Goal 7 on Reliable, Modern Energy ‘Golden Thread’ Linking All Other Targets, Deputy-Secretary-General Tells High-Level Panel” (Press release). United Nations. Archived from the original on 17 May 2021. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all”. SDG Tracker. Archived from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
^ “Energy use per person”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
^ “Europe 2030: Energy saving to become “first fuel””. EU Science Hub. European Commission. 25 February 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Motherway, Brian (19 December 2019). “Energy efficiency is the first fuel, and demand for it needs to grow”. IEA. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2018: Analysis and outlooks to 2040”. IEA. October 2018. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020.
^ Fernandez Pales, Araceli; Bouckaert, Stéphanie; Abergel, Thibaut; Goodson, Timothy (10 June 2021). “Net zero by 2050 hinges on a global push to increase energy efficiency”. IEA. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, pp. 68–69.
^ Mundaca, Luis; Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana; Wilson, Charlie (February 2019). “Demand-side approaches for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 343–362. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..343M. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9722-9.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 12.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 11.
^ Brockway, Paul E.; Sorrell, Steve; Semieniuk, Gregor; Heun, Matthew Kuperus; Court, Victor (May 2021). “Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110781. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110781B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110781.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2019”. IEA. November 2019. Archived from the original on 13 October 2020. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
^ Bond, Kingsmill; Butler-Sloss, Sam; Lovins, Amory; Speelman, Laurens; Topping, Nigel (13 June 2023). “Report / 2023 / X-Change: Electricity / On track for disruption”. Rocky Mountain Institute. Archived from the original on 13 July 2023.
^ Source for data beginning in 2017: “Renewable Energy Market Update Outlook for 2023 and 2024” (PDF). International Energy Agency. June 2023. p. 19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 July 2023. IEA. CC BY 4.0. ● Source for data through 2016: “Renewable Energy Market Update / Outlook for 2021 and 2022” (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency. May 2021. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2023. IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0
^ “World Energy Investment 2023 / Overview and key findings”. International Energy Agency (IEA). 25 May 2023. Archived from the original on 31 May 2023. Global energy investment in clean energy and in fossil fuels, 2015-2023 (chart) — From pages 8 and 12 of World Energy Investment 2023 (archive).
^ IEA 2007, p. 3.
^ Santangeli, Andrea; Toivonen, Tuuli; Pouzols, Federico Montesino; Pogson, Mark; Hastings, Astley; Smith, Pete; Moilanen, Atte (September 2016). “Global change synergies and trade-offs between renewable energy and biodiversity”. GCB Bioenergy. 8 (5): 941–951. Bibcode:2016GCBBi…8..941S. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12299. hdl:2164/6138.
^ Rehbein, Jose A.; Watson, James E. M.; Lane, Joe L.; Sonter, Laura J.; Venter, Oscar; Atkinson, Scott C.; Allan, James R. (May 2020). “Renewable energy development threatens many globally important biodiversity areas”. Global Change Biology. 26 (5): 3040–3051. Bibcode:2020GCBio..26.3040R. doi:10.1111/gcb.15067. PMID 32133726.
^ Ritchie, Hannah (2019). “Renewable Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 4 August 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
^ Renewables 2020 Analysis and forecast to 2025 (PDF) (Report). IEA. 2020. p. 12. Archived from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ “Access to electricity”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. 2020. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
^ “Infrastructure Solutions: The power of purchase agreements”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Power – Analysis”. IEA. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Global Electricity Review 2022”. Ember. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Energy and Electricity | Sustainable Energy | Renewable Energy – World Nuclear Association”. world-nuclear.org. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA (2022), Renewables 2022, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022, License: CC BY 4.0
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 406.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Wind & Solar Share in Electricity Production Data”. Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2021. Enerdata. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 34–35.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Levelized Cost of Energy and of Storage”. Lazard. 19 October 2020. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
^ Victoria, Marta; Haegel, Nancy; Peters, Ian Marius; Sinton, Ron; Jäger-Waldau, Arnulf; del Cañizo, Carlos; Breyer, Christian; Stocks, Matthew; Blakers, Andrew; Kaizuka, Izumi; Komoto, Keiichi; Smets, Arno (May 2021). “Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future”. Joule. 5 (5): 1041–1056. Bibcode:2021Joule…5.1041V. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.005.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 19, 22.
^ Goetz, Katelyn P.; Taylor, Alexander D.; Hofstetter, Yvonne J.; Vaynzof, Yana (13 January 2021). “Sustainability in Perovskite Solar Cells”. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 13 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c17269. PMID 33372760.
^ Xu, Yan; Li, Jinhui; Tan, Quanyin; Peters, Anesia Lauren; Yang, Congren (May 2018). “Global status of recycling waste solar panels: A review”. Waste Management. 75: 450–458. Bibcode:2018WaMan..75..450X. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.036. PMID 29472153.
^ Tian, Xueyu; Stranks, Samuel D.; You, Fengqi (31 July 2020). “Life cycle energy use and environmental implications of high-performance perovskite tandem solar cells”. Science Advances. 6 (31): eabb0055. Bibcode:2020SciA….6…55T. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb0055. PMC 7399695. PMID 32789177.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 35–36.
^ “Solar energy”. International Renewable Energy Agency. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
^ REN21 2020, p. 124.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 366.
^ “What are the advantages and disadvantages of offshore wind farms?”. American Geosciences Institute. 12 May 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Szarka 2007, p. 176.
^ Wang, Shifeng; Wang, Sicong (September 2015). “Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 49: 437–443. Bibcode:2015RSERv..49..437W. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.137.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 215.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 213.
^ Huang, Yu-Fong; Gan, Xing-Jia; Chiueh, Pei-Te (March 2017). “Life cycle assessment and net energy analysis of offshore wind power systems”. Renewable Energy. 102: 98–106. Bibcode:2017REne..102…98H. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.050.
^ Belton, Padraig (7 February 2020). “What happens to all the old wind turbines?”. BBC. Archived from the original on 23 February 2021. Retrieved 27 February 2021.
^ Smil 2017b, p. 286.
^ REN21 2021, p. 21.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Moran, Emilio F.; Lopez, Maria Claudia; Moore, Nathan; Müller, Norbert; Hyndman, David W. (20 November 2018). “Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (47): 11891–11898. Bibcode:2018PNAS..11511891M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1809426115. PMC 6255148. PMID 30397145.
^ Kumar, A.; Schei, T.; Ahenkorah, A.; Caceres Rodriguez, R. et al. “Hydropower“. In IPCC (2011), pp. 451, 462, 488.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Schlömer, S.; Bruckner, T.; Fulton, L.; Hertwich, E. et al. “Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters“. In IPCC (2014), p. 1335.
^ Almeida, Rafael M.; Shi, Qinru; Gomes-Selman, Jonathan M.; Wu, Xiaojian; Xue, Yexiang; Angarita, Hector; Barros, Nathan; Forsberg, Bruce R.; García-Villacorta, Roosevelt; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Melack, John M.; Montoya, Mariana; Perez, Guillaume; Sethi, Suresh A.; Gomes, Carla P.; Flecker, Alexander S. (19 September 2019). “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions of Amazon hydropower with strategic dam planning”. Nature Communications. 10 (1): 4281. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12179-5. PMC 6753097. PMID 31537792.
^ László, Erika (1981). “Geothermal Energy: An Old Ally”. Ambio. 10 (5): 248–249. JSTOR 4312703.
^ REN21 2020, p. 97.
^ “Geothermal Energy Information and Facts”. National Geographic. 19 October 2009. Archived from the original on 8 August 2021. Retrieved 8 August 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Energy mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 2 July 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 222, 228.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 228–229.
^ “Biomass explained”. US Energy Information Administration. 8 June 2021. Archived from the original on 15 September 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2021.
^ Kopetz, Heinz (7 February 2013). “Build a biomass energy market”. Nature. 494 (7435): 29–31. doi:10.1038/494029a. PMID 23389528.
^ Demirbas, Ayhan (August 2008). “Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections”. Energy Conversion and Management. 49 (8): 2106–2116. Bibcode:2008ECM….49.2106D. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.02.020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Correa, Diego F.; Beyer, Hawthorne L.; Fargione, Joseph E.; Hill, Jason D.; Possingham, Hugh P.; Thomas-Hall, Skye R.; Schenk, Peer M. (June 2019). “Towards the implementation of sustainable biofuel production systems”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 107: 250–263. Bibcode:2019RSERv.107..250C. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.005.
^ Daley, Jason (24 April 2018). “The EPA Declared That Burning Wood Is Carbon Neutral. It’s Actually a Lot More Complicated”. Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 14 September 2021.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 512.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Smil 2017a, p. 162.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 73.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 616.
^ “Biofuels explained: Ethanol”. US Energy Information Administration. 18 June 2020. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Foley, Jonathan (5 March 2013). “It’s Time to Rethink America’s Corn System”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 3 January 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Ayompe, Lacour M.; Schaafsma, M.; Egoh, Benis N. (January 2021). “Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 278: 123914. Bibcode:2021JCPro.27823914A. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123914.
^ Lustgarten, Abrahm (20 November 2018). “Palm Oil Was Supposed to Help Save the Planet. Instead It Unleashed a Catastrophe”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
^ Smil 2017a, p. 161.
^ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019, p. 3.
^ REN21 2021, pp. 113–116.
^ “The Role of Gas: Key Findings”. IEA. July 2019. Archived from the original on 1 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “Natural gas and the environment”. US Energy Information Administration. Archived from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Storrow, Benjamin. “Methane Leaks Erase Some of the Climate Benefits of Natural Gas”. Scientific American. Retrieved 31 May 2023.
^ Plumer, Brad (26 June 2019). “As Coal Fades in the U.S., Natural Gas Becomes the Climate Battleground”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Gürsan, C.; de Gooyert, V. (March 2021). “The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 138: 110552. Bibcode:2021RSERv.13810552G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110552. hdl:2066/228782.
^ Budinis, Sara; Krevor, Samuel; Dowell, Niall Mac; Brandon, Nigel; Hawkes, Adam (November 2018). “An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential”. Energy Strategy Reviews. 22: 61–81. Bibcode:2018EneSR..22…61B. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.003.
^ “Zero-emission carbon capture and storage in power plants using higher capture rates”. IEA. 7 January 2021. Archived from the original on 30 March 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah (10 February 2020). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 29 November 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Evans, Simon (8 December 2017). “Solar, wind and nuclear have ‘amazingly low’ carbon footprints, study finds”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 16 March 2021. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 5.4.1.2.
^ IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, p. 38.
^ “Global Status Report 2024”. Global CCS Institute. pp. 57–58. Retrieved 19 October 2024. The report lists 50 facilities, of which 3 are direct air capture facilities and 3 are transport/storage facilities
^ Roser, Max (10 December 2020). “The world’s energy problem”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
^ Rhodes, Richard (19 July 2018). “Why Nuclear Power Must Be Part of the Energy Solution”. Yale Environment 360. Yale School of the Environment. Archived from the original on 9 August 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
^ “Nuclear Power in the World Today”. World Nuclear Association. June 2021. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Bailey, Ronald (10 May 2023). “New study: Nuclear power is humanity’s greenest energy option”. Reason.com. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Nuclear Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ MacKay 2008, p. 162.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Gill, Matthew; Livens, Francis; Peakman, Aiden (2014). “Nuclear Fission”. Future Energy. pp. 135–149. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00007-4. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ Muellner, Nikolaus; Arnold, Nikolaus; Gufler, Klaus; Kromp, Wolfgang; Renneberg, Wolfgang; Liebert, Wolfgang (August 2021). “Nuclear energy – The solution to climate change?”. Energy Policy. 155: 112363. Bibcode:2021EnPol.15512363M. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112363.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.1.
^ Timmer, John (21 November 2020). “Why are nuclear plants so expensive? Safety’s only part of the story”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
^ Technical assessment of nuclear energy with respect to the ‘do no significant harm’ criteria of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (‘Taxonomy Regulation’) (PDF) (Report). European Commission Joint Research Centre. 2021. p. 53. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ Locatelli, Giorgio; Mignacca, Benito (2020). “Small Modular Nuclear Reactors”. Future Energy. pp. 151–169. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00008-6. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ McGrath, Matt (6 November 2019). “Nuclear fusion is ‘a question of when, not if'”. BBC. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
^ Amos, Jonathan (9 February 2022). “Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy”. BBC. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 10 February 2022.
^ “Energy Transition Investment Now On Par with Fossil Fuel”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). 10 February 2023. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 202–203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d IPCC 2014, 7.11.3.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 106–110.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ “Reaching net zero emissions demands faster innovation, but we’ve already come a long way – Analysis”. International Energy Agency. 13 November 2023. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, p. 15.
^ “Innovation – Energy System”. International Energy Agency. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ World Health Organization 2018, Executive Summary.
^ Vandyck, T.; Keramidas, K.; Kitous, A.; Spadaro, J.V.; et al. (2018). “Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges”. Nature Communications. 9 (1): 4939. Bibcode:2018NatCo…9.4939V. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06885-9. PMC 6250710. PMID 30467311.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 46–55.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 97.
^ Hopwood, David (May 2007). “Blueprint for sustainability?”. Refocus. 8 (3): 54–57. doi:10.1016/S1471-0846(07)70068-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 47.
^ “Introduction to System Integration of Renewables”. IEA. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Blanco, Herib; Faaij, André (January 2018). “A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage” (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81: 1049–1086. Bibcode:2018RSERv..81.1049B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.062.
^ REN21 2020, p. 177.
^ Bloess, Andreas; Schill, Wolf-Peter; Zerrahn, Alexander (February 2018). “Power-to-heat for renewable energy integration: A review of technologies, modeling approaches, and flexibility potentials”. Applied Energy. 212: 1611–1626. Bibcode:2018ApEn..212.1611B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.073. hdl:10419/200120.
^ IEA 2020, p. 109.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Koohi-Fayegh, S.; Rosen, M.A. (February 2020). “A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments”. Journal of Energy Storage. 27: 101047. Bibcode:2020JEnSt..2701047K. doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101047.
^ Katz, Cheryl (17 December 2020). “The batteries that could make fossil fuels obsolete”. BBC. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Climate change and batteries: the search for future power storage solutions” (PDF). Climate change: science and solutions. The Royal Society. 19 May 2021. Archived from the original on 16 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Hunt, Julian D.; Byers, Edward; Wada, Yoshihide; Parkinson, Simon; Gernaat, David E. H. J.; Langan, Simon; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Riahi, Keywan (19 February 2020). “Global resource potential of seasonal pumped hydropower storage for energy and water storage”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 947. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11..947H. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14555-y. PMC 7031375. PMID 32075965.
^ Balaraman, Kavya (12 October 2020). “To batteries and beyond: With seasonal storage potential, hydrogen offers ‘a different ballgame entirely'”. Utility Dive. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Cole, Laura (15 November 2020). “How to cut carbon out of your heating”. BBC. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Electricity Mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 13 October 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.2.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 167–169.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 30.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Herrington, Richard (24 May 2021). “Mining our green future”. Nature Reviews Materials. 6 (6): 456–458. Bibcode:2021NatRM…6..456H. doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00325-9.
^ Mudd, Gavin M. “Metals and Elements Needed to Support Future Energy Systems”. In Letcher (2020), pp. 723–724.
^ Babbitt, Callie W. (August 2020). “Sustainability perspectives on lithium-ion batteries”. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 22 (6): 1213–1214. Bibcode:2020CTEP…22.1213B. doi:10.1007/s10098-020-01890-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, pp. 91–92.
^ Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Lewis, Alastair C. (10 June 2021). “Optimising air quality co-benefits in a hydrogen economy: a case for hydrogen-specific standards for NO x emissions”. Environmental Science: Atmospheres. 1 (5): 201–207. Bibcode:2021ESAt….1..201L. doi:10.1039/D1EA00037C. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 3.0 license.
^ Reed, Stanley; Ewing, Jack (13 July 2021). “Hydrogen Is One Answer to Climate Change. Getting It Is the Hard Part”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 July 2021. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
^ IRENA 2019, p. 9.
^ Bonheure, Mike; Vandewalle, Laurien A.; Marin, Guy B.; Van Geem, Kevin M. (March 2021). “Dream or Reality? Electrification of the Chemical Process Industries”. CEP Magazine. American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Archived from the original on 17 July 2021. Retrieved 6 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Griffiths, Steve; Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Kim, Jinsoo; Bazilian, Morgan; Uratani, Joao M. (October 2021). “Industrial decarbonization via hydrogen: A critical and systematic review of developments, socio-technical systems and policy options”. Energy Research & Social Science. 80: 102208. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102208.
^ Palys, Matthew J.; Daoutidis, Prodromos (May 2020). “Using hydrogen and ammonia for renewable energy storage: A geographically comprehensive techno-economic study”. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 136: 106785. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106785.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 12, 22.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 15, 75–76.
^ Kjellberg-Motton, Brendan (7 February 2022). “Steel decarbonisation gathers speed | Argus Media”. www.argusmedia.com. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
^ Blank, Thomas; Molly, Patrick (January 2020). “Hydrogen’s Decarbonization Impact for Industry” (PDF). Rocky Mountain Institute. pp. 2, 7, 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 September 2020.
^ Plötz, Patrick (31 January 2022). “Hydrogen technology is unlikely to play a major role in sustainable road transport”. Nature Electronics. 5 (1): 8–10. doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00706-6.
^ Fraser, Simon D.S.; Lock, Karen (December 2011). “Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling”. European Journal of Public Health. 21 (6): 738–743. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq145. PMID 20929903.
^ “Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 12 January 2016. Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Bigazzi, Alexander (May 2019). “Comparison of marginal and average emission factors for passenger transportation modes”. Applied Energy. 242: 1460–1466. Bibcode:2019ApEn..242.1460B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.172.
^ Schäfer, Andreas W.; Yeh, Sonia (20 April 2020). “A holistic analysis of passenger travel energy and greenhouse gas intensities”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 459–462. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..459S. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0514-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. xxv.
^ IEA 2021, p. 137.
^ Pucher, John; Buehler, Ralph (2 November 2017). “Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future”. Transport Reviews. 37 (6): 689–694. doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1340234.
^ Smith, John (22 September 2016). “Sustainable transport”. European Commission. Archived from the original on 22 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Hanssen, Steef V.; Lam, Aileen; Pollitt, Hector; Salas, Pablo; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Huijbregts, Mark A. J.; Mercure, Jean-Francois (23 March 2020). “Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 437–447. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..437K. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7. PMC 7308170. PMID 32572385.
^ Bogdanov, Dmitrii; Farfan, Javier; Sadovskaia, Kristina; Aghahosseini, Arman; Child, Michael; Gulagi, Ashish; Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon; de Souza Noel Simas Barbosa, Larissa; Breyer, Christian (6 March 2019). “Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps”. Nature Communications. 10 (1). doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08855-1. PMC 6403340. PMID 30842423.
^ Martini, Giorgio; Grigoratos, Theodoros (2014). Non-exhaust traffic related emissions – Brake and tyre wear PM. EUR 26648. Publications Office of the European Union. p. 42. ISBN 978-92-79-38303-8. OCLC 1044281650. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021.
^ Non-exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Transport. 2020. pp. 8–9. doi:10.1787/4a4dc6ca-en. ISBN 978-92-64-45244-2.
^ “CO₂ performance of new passenger cars in Europe”. www.eea.europa.eu. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 133–137.
^ “Rail and waterborne – best for low-carbon motorised transport”. European Environment Agency. Archived from the original on 9 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Miller, Joe (9 September 2020). “Hydrogen takes a back seat to electric for passenger vehicles”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 136, 139.
^ Biomass in a low-carbon economy (Report). UK Committee on Climate Change. November 2018. p. 18. Archived from the original on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
^ “Buildings”. IEA. Archived from the original on 14 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Mortensen, Anders Winther; Mathiesen, Brian Vad; Hansen, Anders Bavnhøj; Pedersen, Sigurd Lauge; Grandal, Rune Duban; Wenzel, Henrik (October 2020). “The role of electrification and hydrogen in breaking the biomass bottleneck of the renewable energy system – A study on the Danish energy system”. Applied Energy. 275: 115331. Bibcode:2020ApEn..27515331M. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115331.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Pollitt, Hector; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Daioglou, Vassilis; Mercure, Jean-Francois (February 2019). “Simulating the deep decarbonisation of residential heating for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 521–550. arXiv:1710.11019. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..521K. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9710-0.
^ Alva, Guruprasad; Lin, Yaxue; Fang, Guiyin (February 2018). “An overview of thermal energy storage systems”. Energy. 144: 341–378. Bibcode:2018Ene…144..341A. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.037.
^ Plumer, Brad (30 June 2021). “Are ‘Heat Pumps’ the Answer to Heat Waves? Some Cities Think So”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Abergel, Thibaut (June 2020). “Heat Pumps”. IEA. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
^ Buffa, Simone; Cozzini, Marco; D’Antoni, Matteo; Baratieri, Marco; et al. (2019). “5th generation district heating and cooling systems: A review of existing cases in Europe”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 104: 504–522. Bibcode:2019RSERv.104..504B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.059.
^ Lund, Henrik; Werner, Sven; Wiltshire, Robin; Svendsen, Svend; et al. (2014). “4th Generation District Heating (4GDH)”. Energy. 68: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.089. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Abdolhamidi, Shervin (27 September 2018). “An ancient engineering feat that harnessed the wind”. BBC. Archived from the original on 12 August 2021. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
^ “How cities are using nature to keep heatwaves at bay”. United Nations Environment Programme. 22 July 2020. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Four Things You Should Know About Sustainable Cooling”. World Bank. 23 May 2019. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Mastrucci, Alessio; Byers, Edward; Pachauri, Shonali; Rao, Narasimha D. (March 2019). “Improving the SDG energy poverty targets: Residential cooling needs in the Global South”. Energy and Buildings. 186: 405–415. Bibcode:2019EneBu.186..405M. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.015.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Smith & Pillarisetti 2017, pp. 145–146.
^ “Cooking appliances”. Natural Resources Canada. 16 January 2013. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
^ World Health Organization; International Energy Agency; Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves; United Nations Development Programme; Energising Development; and World Bank (2018). Accelerating SDG 7 Achievement Policy Brief 02: Achieving Universal Access to Clean and Modern Cooking Fuels, Technologies and Services (PDF) (Report). United Nations. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 March 2021.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 75.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 29.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 12.
^ REN21 2020, p. 40.
^ IEA 2020, p. 135.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 50.
^ Åhman, Max; Nilsson, Lars J.; Johansson, Bengt (4 July 2017). “Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries”. Climate Policy. 17 (5): 634–649. Bibcode:2017CliPo..17..634A. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1167009.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. xxiii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 186.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 39–45.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 109, Chapter 6 – We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 28–36.
^ Ciucci, M. (February 2020). “Renewable Energy”. European Parliament. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ “State Renewable Portfolio Standards and Goals”. National Conference of State Legislators. 17 April 2020. Archived from the original on 3 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–25.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 184–187.
^ IEA 2021, p. 16.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 106–109, Chapter 6 – “We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Plumer, Brad (8 October 2018). “New U.N. Climate Report Says Put a High Price on Carbon”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Green, Jessica F (April 2021). “Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses”. Environmental Research Letters. 16 (4): 043004. Bibcode:2021ERL….16d3004G. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.5.2.1.
^ State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019 (PDF) (Report). World Bank. June 2019. pp. 8–11. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1435-8. hdl:10986/29687. ISBN 978-1-4648-1435-8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 May 2020.
^ “Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax | Canada”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 28 October 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
^ Carr, Mathew (10 October 2018). “How High Does Carbon Need to Be? Somewhere From $20–$27,000”. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 5 August 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “EAC launches new inquiry weighing up carbon border tax measures”. UK Parliament. 24 September 2021. Archived from the original on 24 September 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Plumer, Brad (14 July 2021). “Europe Is Proposing a Border Carbon Tax. What Is It and How Will It Work?”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
^ Bharti, Bianca (12 August 2021). “Taxing imports of heavy carbon emitters is gaining momentum – and it could hurt Canadian industry: Report”. Financial Post. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. vii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 13.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–18.
^ IRENA, IEA & REN21 2018, p. 19.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “24 million jobs to open up in the green economy”. International Labour Organization. 14 May 2018. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
^ Catsaros, Oktavia (26 January 2023). “Global Low-Carbon Energy Technology Investment Surges Past $1 Trillion for the First Time”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). Figure 1. Archived from the original on 22 May 2023. Defying supply chain disruptions and macroeconomic headwinds, 2022 energy transition investment jumped 31% to draw level with fossil fuels
^ “Global Clean Energy Investment Jumps 17%, Hits $1.8 Trillion in 2023, According to BloombergNEF Report”. BNEF.com. Bloomberg NEF. 30 January 2024. Archived from the original on 28 June 2024. Start years differ by sector but all sectors are present from 2020 onwards.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b 2024 data: “Energy Transition Investment Trends 2025 / Abridged report” (PDF). BloombergNEF. 30 January 2025. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 February 2025.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Mazzucato, Mariana; Semieniuk, Gregor (February 2018). “Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 127: 8–22. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021.
^ United Nations Development Programme & United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2019, p. 24.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 96.
^ IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, pp. 129, 132.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 54.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 9.
^ Roberts, J. Timmons; Weikmans, Romain; Robinson, Stacy-ann; Ciplet, David; Khan, Mizan; Falzon, Danielle (March 2021). “Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance”. Nature Climate Change. 11 (3): 180–182. Bibcode:2021NatCC..11..180R. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-00990-2.
^ Radwanski, Adam (29 September 2021). “Opinion: As pivotal climate summit approaches, Canada at centre of efforts to repair broken trust among poorer countries”. The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 30 September 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
^ “Here are the clean energy innovations that will beat climate change”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
^ “Home”. www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ Bridle, Richard; Sharma, Shruti; Mostafa, Mostafa; Geddes, Anna (June 2019). “Fossil Fuel to Clean Energy Subsidy Swaps: How to pay for an energy revolution” (PDF). International Institute for Sustainable Development. p. iv. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 November 2019.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; Belesova, Kristine; Boykoff, Maxwell; Byass, Peter; Cai, Wenjia; Campbell-Lendrum, Diarmid; Capstick, Stuart; Chambers, Jonathan; Dalin, Carole; Daly, Meaghan; Dasandi, Niheer; Davies, Michael; Drummond, Paul; Dubrow, Robert; Ebi, Kristie L; Eckelman, Matthew; Ekins, Paul; Escobar, Luis E; Fernandez Montoya, Lucia; Georgeson, Lucien; Graham, Hilary; Haggar, Paul; Hamilton, Ian; Hartinger, Stella; Hess, Jeremy; Kelman, Ilan; Kiesewetter, Gregor; Kjellstrom, Tord; Kniveton, Dominic; Lemke, Bruno; Liu, Yang; Lott, Melissa; Lowe, Rachel; Sewe, Maquins Odhiambo; Martinez-Urtaza, Jaime; Maslin, Mark; McAllister, Lucy; McGushin, Alice; Jankin Mikhaylov, Slava; Milner, James; Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar; Morrissey, Karyn; Murray, Kris; Munzert, Simon; Nilsson, Maria; Neville, Tara; Oreszczyn, Tadj; Owfi, Fereidoon; Pearman, Olivia; Pencheon, David; Phung, Dung; Pye, Steve; Quinn, Ruth; Rabbaniha, Mahnaz; Robinson, Elizabeth; Rocklöv, Joacim; Semenza, Jan C; Sherman, Jodi; Shumake-Guillemot, Joy; Tabatabaei, Meisam; Taylor, Jonathon; Trinanes, Joaquin; Wilkinson, Paul; Costello, Anthony; Gong, Peng; Montgomery, Hugh (November 2019). “The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate”. The Lancet. 394 (10211): 1836–1878. Bibcode:2019Lanc..394.1836W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6. PMC 7616843. PMID 31733928.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2020, p. 10.
^ Kuzemko, Caroline; Bradshaw, Michael; Bridge, Gavin; Goldthau, Andreas; Jewell, Jessica; Overland, Indra; Scholten, Daniel; Van de Graaf, Thijs; Westphal, Kirsten (October 2020). “Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions”. Energy Research & Social Science. 68: 101685. Bibcode:2020ERSS…6801685K. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685. PMC 7330551. PMID 32839704.
^ IRENA 2021, p. 5.