Sustainable Technology of 3640

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3640 ?

It seems you might be asking about two different things:

1. Videojet 3640 Laser Marking System:

This is an industrial laser coding system used for marking products in manufacturing, particularly in the pharmaceutical, tobacco, and beverage industries.
Sustainability aspects: While the primary focus is on speed and efficiency, some sustainability aspects could include:
- Reduced waste: Precise laser marking can minimize errors and reduce the need for re-labeling or discarding products.
- Long-lasting equipment: Durable design and minimal maintenance contribute to a longer lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements.
- Energy efficiency: Compared to some older technologies, laser marking can be more energy-efficient, though specific data on the 3640’s energy consumption would be needed.

2. NORDEL™ IP 3640 EPDM:

This is a type of synthetic rubber (EPDM) used in various applications, including automotive parts and industrial products.
Sustainability aspects: EPDM in general can offer some sustainability benefits:
- Durability: EPDM products can be long-lasting and resistant to weathering, reducing the need for replacements.
- Recyclability: While not as easily recyclable as some other materials, EPDM recycling technologies are being developed.
- Lightweighting: In some applications, EPDM can help create lighter products (e.g., in vehicles), which can improve fuel efficiency.

Important Note: To get a complete picture of the sustainability of either the Videojet 3640 or NORDEL™ IP 3640, you would need to look at factors like:

Manufacturing processes: How environmentally friendly are the production processes for these products?
Energy consumption: What is the energy usage of the 3640 laser system?
End-of-life: How are these products disposed of or recycled?
Specific applications: The sustainability benefits of EPDM can vary depending on how it is used.

If you have more specific questions about either of these products or their sustainability, feel free to ask!

What is Sustainable Technology of 3640 ?

It seems you’re interested in the sustainability aspects of the Videojet 3640 laser marking system. While it’s primarily designed for high-speed and high-volume industrial marking, there are some potential sustainability benefits to consider:

Reduced waste: The precise nature of laser marking can help minimize errors in coding and labeling. This leads to less waste from rejected or re-labeled products, which is a positive environmental impact.
Long-lasting equipment: Videojet designs its equipment for industrial use, emphasizing durability and reliability. A longer lifespan for the 3640 laser system means less frequent replacements, reducing the consumption of resources and the environmental impact of manufacturing new machines.
Energy efficiency: Compared to some older marking technologies, laser marking can be more energy-efficient. However, it’s important to note that the specific energy consumption of the Videojet 3640 would need to be evaluated to fully understand its energy footprint.
Reduced consumables: Unlike inkjet printers that require ink cartridges, laser marking doesn’t rely on consumables like ink. This eliminates the waste associated with ink cartridges and their packaging.

To get a more complete picture of the sustainability of the Videojet 3640, you would need to consider factors like:

Manufacturing process: How environmentally friendly is the manufacturing process for the 3640 laser system itself?
Materials used: What materials are used in the construction of the machine, and are they sourced responsibly?
End-of-life management: How is the 3640 laser system disposed of or recycled at the end of its life?

Overall, while the Videojet 3640’s primary focus is on efficiency and performance, it does offer some potential sustainability benefits through waste reduction, durability, and potentially lower energy consumption compared to some alternatives. However, a full assessment of its environmental impact would require more detailed information about its lifecycle.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3640 ?

The Videojet 3640 laser marking system, with its potential sustainability benefits, is relevant to a range of industries and businesses that prioritize efficient and environmentally conscious production. Here are some key stakeholders who would find the sustainable technology of the 3640 particularly valuable:

Manufacturers in the pharmaceutical, tobacco, and beverage industries: These sectors often have high-volume production lines where even small improvements in efficiency and waste reduction can have a significant impact. The 3640’s speed and precision, combined with its potential for reduced waste and energy consumption, make it an attractive option for these manufacturers.
Companies with sustainability goals: Businesses that are committed to reducing their environmental footprint will find the 3640’s sustainability features aligned with their objectives. The laser system can contribute to achieving waste reduction targets, improving energy efficiency, and minimizing the use of consumables.
Operations managers and production line supervisors: These individuals are responsible for optimizing production processes and minimizing downtime. The 3640’s reliability, ease of use, and potential for remote service can help improve overall efficiency and reduce operational costs.
Consumers: Ultimately, consumers benefit from sustainable technologies like the 3640. By supporting companies that adopt environmentally responsible practices, consumers contribute to a more sustainable future.

In summary, the Videojet 3640’s sustainable technology appeals to a wide range of stakeholders, from manufacturers and operations managers to consumers who value environmentally conscious products and practices.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3640 ?

The need for sustainable technology like that offered by the Videojet 3640 laser marking system is becoming increasingly urgent. Here are some key situations and trends driving the demand for such solutions:

Growing environmental awareness: Businesses and consumers are more aware than ever of the environmental impact of their choices. This increased awareness is driving demand for products and technologies that minimize waste, reduce energy consumption, and promote sustainability.
Increasing regulatory pressure: Governments around the world are implementing stricter environmental regulations, pushing industries to adopt more sustainable practices. This regulatory landscape makes sustainable technologies like the 3640 essential for compliance and long-term business success.
Rising costs of resources: The prices of energy, raw materials, and waste disposal are increasing. Sustainable technologies that reduce resource consumption and waste generation can help businesses save money and remain competitive.
Consumer demand for sustainable products: Consumers are increasingly seeking out products from companies that demonstrate a commitment to sustainability. Businesses that adopt sustainable technologies can enhance their brand image and attract environmentally conscious customers.
Pressure from investors and stakeholders: Investors and other stakeholders are increasingly incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into their decision-making. Companies that prioritize sustainability are more likely to attract investment and maintain positive relationships with stakeholders.

In summary, the need for sustainable technology like the Videojet 3640 is driven by a combination of environmental concerns, regulatory requirements, economic factors, and consumer preferences. As these trends continue to intensify, the demand for sustainable solutions will only grow stronger.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3640 ?

The need for sustainable technology like the Videojet 3640 laser marking system is relevant across a wide range of industries and applications. Here are some key areas where its sustainable features are particularly valuable:

1. Industries with High-Volume Production:

Pharmaceuticals: This industry requires precise and error-free coding for product identification, traceability, and anti-counterfeiting. The 3640’s high speed and accuracy, combined with its potential for waste reduction, make it ideal for pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Beverages: Beverage production lines often operate at very high speeds, requiring efficient and reliable marking solutions. The 3640’s speed and durability, along with its potential for reduced energy consumption, are well-suited to this industry.
Tobacco: Similar to pharmaceuticals and beverages, the tobacco industry also has high-volume production needs. The 3640’s ability to handle complex codes at high speeds, while minimizing waste, is valuable in this sector.

2. Companies with Sustainability Focus:

Businesses with environmental goals: Companies committed to reducing their environmental footprint will find the 3640’s sustainability features aligned with their objectives. It can contribute to waste reduction, energy efficiency, and minimizing the use of consumables.
Organizations seeking cost savings: The 3640’s long lifespan, reduced maintenance needs, and potential for lower energy consumption can lead to cost savings in the long run. This makes it an attractive option for businesses looking to improve their bottom line while also being environmentally responsible.

3. Applications Requiring Precision and Durability:

Medical devices: Medical devices require permanent and legible markings for identification and traceability. The 3640’s laser marking technology ensures high-quality, durable codes that meet industry standards.
Automotive parts: Automotive components often need to withstand harsh environments and maintain their markings over time. The 3640’s ability to create permanent and durable marks makes it suitable for this application.

4. Situations with Space Constraints:

Production lines with limited space: The 3640’s compact design allows it to be integrated into production lines with space limitations. This is particularly important in industries where production space is at a premium.

In summary, the Videojet 3640’s sustainable technology is required in a variety of industries and applications where efficiency, precision, and environmental responsibility are important. Its features make it a valuable tool for businesses looking to optimize their production processes while minimizing their environmental impact.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3640 ?

The need for sustainable technology in the Videojet 3640 laser marking system arises from a confluence of factors, all pointing towards a growing emphasis on environmentally responsible industrial practices:

1. Environmental Concerns:

Resource Depletion: Manufacturing processes consume significant resources, and there’s a growing need to minimize this consumption. Sustainable technologies like the 3640, with its potential for reduced waste and energy use, contribute to resource conservation.
Waste Generation: Industrial processes generate substantial waste, posing environmental challenges. The 3640’s precise marking can minimize errors, reducing the need for re-labeling or discarding products, thus reducing waste.
Energy Consumption: Industrial equipment often consumes a lot of energy. While specific data on the 3640’s energy consumption is needed, laser marking in general can be more energy-efficient than some older technologies, contributing to lower energy usage.

2. Regulatory Landscape:

Environmental Regulations: Governments worldwide are implementing stricter environmental regulations. These regulations compel industries to adopt cleaner and more sustainable technologies. The 3640, with its potential for reduced environmental impact, helps companies comply with these regulations.

3. Economic Factors:

Cost Savings: Sustainable technologies can often lead to cost savings in the long run. The 3640’s durability and reduced need for consumables can translate to lower operational costs.
Market Demand: Consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable products and practices. Companies that adopt sustainable technologies like the 3640 can enhance their brand image and attract environmentally conscious customers.

4. Social Responsibility:

Corporate Sustainability Goals: Many companies have set ambitious sustainability goals. The 3640 can help them achieve these goals by contributing to waste reduction, energy efficiency, and responsible resource management.
Stakeholder Expectations: Investors, employees, and communities are increasingly expecting companies to demonstrate environmental responsibility. Adopting sustainable technologies like the 3640 can help companies meet these expectations.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology in the Videojet 3640 stems from a combination of environmental imperatives, regulatory pressures, economic benefits, and growing social awareness. It’s a reflection of the broader shift towards sustainable practices in industries worldwide.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3640 ?

Unfortunately, I don’t have access to specific case studies detailing the sustainable impact of the Videojet 3640 laser marking system. However, I can provide you with a hypothetical case study based on the information available about the 3640 and its potential sustainability benefits:

Hypothetical Case Study: Sustainable Marking with Videojet 3640 in a Pharmaceutical Company

Company: A large pharmaceutical company producing high volumes of prescription drugs.

Challenge: The company faced challenges in meeting its sustainability goals due to high waste from labeling errors and the energy consumption of its older marking technology. They also needed a solution that could handle the increasing demand for serialization and track-and-trace capabilities.

Solution: The company implemented the Videojet 3640 laser marking system on its high-speed production lines.

Results:

Reduced Waste: The 3640’s precise laser marking significantly reduced labeling errors, leading to a 20% decrease in product waste due to incorrect or illegible codes. This resulted in cost savings and a lower environmental impact.
Improved Energy Efficiency: While specific data is unavailable, the company observed a noticeable reduction in energy consumption compared to their previous marking system. This contributed to lower operating costs and a smaller carbon footprint.
Enhanced Traceability: The 3640’s ability to handle complex codes at high speeds enabled the company to implement robust serialization and track-and-trace programs. This improved product security and helped prevent counterfeiting.
Increased Productivity: The 3640’s high speed and reliability allowed the company to increase production throughput while maintaining high-quality marking. This improved efficiency and profitability.

Conclusion:

The Videojet 3640 laser marking system helped the pharmaceutical company achieve its sustainability goals by reducing waste, improving energy efficiency, and enhancing traceability. The system also contributed to increased productivity and cost savings. This case study demonstrates the potential benefits of sustainable technology in high-volume manufacturing environments.

Note: This is a hypothetical case study. Actual results may vary depending on the specific application and circumstances.

To find real case studies, you could try the following:

Contact Videojet directly: They may have case studies available on their website or through their sales representatives.
Search industry publications: Look for articles or case studies in pharmaceutical, beverage, or tobacco industry publications that mention the Videojet 3640 and its impact.
Explore online resources: Search for case studies or testimonials related to sustainable technology in manufacturing, focusing on laser marking solutions.

By exploring these resources, you may be able to find real-world examples of how the Videojet 3640 has helped companies achieve their sustainability goals.

COURTESY :RBC

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3640 ?

I cannot directly provide you with a white paper on the sustainable technology of the Videojet 3640. I’m a language model; I don’t have access to specific documents like white papers unless they are publicly available on the internet. Videojet, the manufacturer, is the most likely source.

However, I can guide you on how to find such information and suggest what a potential white paper might cover:

How to Find Information:

Contact Videojet Directly: This is the best approach. Visit the Videojet website and look for contact information (sales, customer service, or technical support). Explain your interest in the 3640’s sustainability aspects and inquire about any available white papers, case studies, or technical documentation related to its environmental impact.
Search Videojet’s Website: Explore the Videojet website thoroughly. Look for sections on products, sustainability, resources, or downloads. They might have white papers, brochures, or application notes available for download. Use keywords like “Videojet 3640,” “sustainability,” “laser marking,” “environmental impact,” “energy efficiency,” and “waste reduction.”
Industry Publications: Search relevant industry publications (pharmaceutical, beverage, packaging, etc.) for articles or reports that might discuss sustainable marking technologies or feature the Videojet 3640.
General Web Search: Use search engines like Google, Bing, or DuckDuckGo to search for information. Use specific keywords as mentioned above.

What a White Paper Might Cover:

A white paper on the sustainable technology of the Videojet 3640 might include the following:

Introduction to Laser Marking and Sustainability: A brief overview of laser marking technology and its potential advantages over other marking methods in terms of sustainability.
Videojet 3640 Features and Benefits: A detailed description of the 3640’s features and how they contribute to sustainability. This might include:
- Reduced Waste: How precise laser marking minimizes errors and reduces the need for re-labeling or product discard.
- Energy Efficiency: Comparison of the 3640’s energy consumption to other marking technologies.
- Durability and Longevity: How the 3640’s robust design contributes to a longer lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements.
- Reduced Consumables: The absence of ink cartridges and other consumables, minimizing waste and resource consumption.
Environmental Impact Assessment: Data or estimates on the 3640’s environmental footprint, including energy consumption, waste generation, and lifecycle impact.
Case Studies: Real-world examples of how companies have used the 3640 to achieve sustainability goals.
Comparison with Alternative Technologies: A comparison of the 3640’s sustainability performance to other marking technologies (e.g., inkjet, thermal transfer).
Conclusion and Future Outlook: A summary of the 3640’s sustainability benefits and a discussion of future trends in sustainable marking technology.

Remember, contacting Videojet directly is the most effective way to obtain specific information or documentation about the 3640’s sustainability features.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3640 ?

The Videojet 3640 laser marking system, with its potential for sustainable operation, finds application in various industrial sectors where efficient, precise, and environmentally conscious marking is crucial. Here are some key industrial applications:

1. Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices:

Product Identification and Traceability: In the pharmaceutical industry, accurate and permanent marking is essential for product identification, tracking, and anti-counterfeiting measures. The 3640’s laser marking capabilities ensure high-quality, legible codes that meet industry standards and regulatory requirements.
Serialization and Track-and-Trace: The 3640 can handle complex codes at high speeds, enabling pharmaceutical companies to implement robust serialization and track-and-trace programs. This helps prevent counterfeiting, ensures product integrity, and facilitates efficient recalls if necessary.
Medical Device Marking: Medical devices often require permanent and biocompatible markings for identification and traceability. The 3640’s laser marking technology can create durable marks on various materials used in medical devices, ensuring compliance with regulations and patient safety.

2. Food and Beverage:

High-Speed Coding: Food and beverage production lines often operate at very high speeds, requiring marking solutions that can keep pace. The 3640’s high-speed capabilities enable efficient marking of date codes, batch numbers, and other essential information on packaging.
Product Information and Branding: Laser marking can be used to apply product information, logos, and branding elements to food and beverage packaging. This enhances product appearance and provides consumers with important details about the product.
Sustainability in Packaging: The 3640’s potential for reduced waste and energy consumption aligns with the food and beverage industry’s growing focus on sustainable packaging practices.

3. Tobacco:

High-Volume Marking: The tobacco industry also has high-volume production needs, requiring efficient and reliable marking solutions. The 3640’s speed and durability make it well-suited for marking codes on cigarette packs and other tobacco products.
Anti-Counterfeiting Measures: Laser marking can be used to apply security features and anti-counterfeiting measures to tobacco packaging, helping to protect brand integrity and prevent illicit trade.

4. Other Industries:

Automotive: The 3640 can be used to mark parts and components in the automotive industry for identification, traceability, and quality control purposes.
Electronics: Laser marking is suitable for marking electronic components and devices with serial numbers, barcodes, and other identifying information.
Cosmetics: The cosmetics industry uses laser marking for product identification, branding, and applying information on packaging.

In summary, the Videojet 3640’s sustainable technology finds application in various industries where efficient, precise, and environmentally responsible marking is essential. Its features make it a valuable tool for businesses looking to optimize their production processes while minimizing their environmental impact.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3640 ?

While I don’t have access to specific research and development (R&D) details for the Videojet 3640, I can discuss the general trends and areas of focus in sustainable technology development for laser marking systems like the 3640:

1. Energy Efficiency:

Laser Source Optimization: R&D efforts are likely focused on improving the efficiency of the laser source itself, minimizing energy consumption while maintaining marking performance. This could involve exploring new laser technologies or optimizing existing ones.
System Design: Optimizing the overall system design, including power management and cooling systems, can also contribute to energy efficiency.
Standby Modes: Developing intelligent standby modes that reduce power consumption when the laser is not in use can further enhance energy efficiency.

2. Waste Reduction:

Precise Beam Control: Advanced beam control technologies can minimize the amount of material removed during laser marking, reducing waste and potentially enabling the use of thinner or more sustainable substrates.
Software and Automation: User-friendly software and automation features can help reduce errors and minimize the need for re-marking or discarding products, contributing to waste reduction.

3. Materials Compatibility:

Expanding Substrate Range: R&D efforts may focus on expanding the range of materials that can be effectively marked with the 3640, including more sustainable or recyclable substrates.
Material Characterization: Understanding the interaction between different materials and laser parameters is crucial for optimizing marking quality and minimizing environmental impact.

4. Environmental Impact Assessment:

Lifecycle Analysis: Conducting lifecycle assessments to evaluate the environmental impact of the 3640 throughout its entire lifespan, from manufacturing to end-of-life, can identify areas for improvement.
Eco-Friendly Materials: Exploring the use of more sustainable materials in the construction of the laser system itself can further reduce its environmental footprint.

5. Industry 4.0 Integration:

Connectivity and Data Analytics: Integrating the 3640 with Industry 4.0 systems can enable real-time monitoring of marking processes, allowing for optimization and early detection of potential issues, reducing waste and downtime.
Remote Service and Diagnostics: Remote service capabilities can minimize the need for on-site maintenance, reducing travel and associated environmental impacts.

6. Continuous Improvement:

Feedback from Users: Gathering feedback from users on the 3640’s performance and sustainability aspects can provide valuable insights for future R&D efforts.
Collaboration with Suppliers: Working closely with suppliers to source more sustainable components and materials can contribute to the overall sustainability of the laser system.

It’s important to remember that these are general trends in sustainable technology development for laser marking systems. The specific R&D efforts for the Videojet 3640 would depend on Videojet’s priorities and the needs of its customers.

To get more specific information about Videojet’s R&D in this area, I recommend contacting Videojet directly or exploring their website and publications for any information on their sustainability initiatives and technology development.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.