Sustainable Technology of 3560

Leave a Comment / Blog / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3560 ?

Unfortunately, with just the number “3560”, it’s impossible to determine the specific product or technology you’re asking about. This number could refer to a model number for anything from a laptop to a tractor, and each would have different sustainability considerations.

However, I can provide you with some general information about how sustainability is being incorporated into various technologies:

General Trends in Sustainable Technology:

  • Energy Efficiency: Many technologies are being designed to consume less energy, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and lowering carbon footprints. This includes things like LED lighting, energy-efficient appliances, and optimized software for electronics.
  • Recycled and Sustainable Materials: Manufacturers are increasingly using recycled materials in their products and packaging. They are also exploring bio-based plastics and other sustainable alternatives to traditional materials.
  • Reduced Waste: Companies are designing products with longer lifespans, making them easier to repair or upgrade, and offering recycling programs to reduce electronic waste.
  • Renewable Energy Integration: Some technologies are designed to work with renewable energy sources like solar or wind power, further reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Circular Economy Principles: The concept of a circular economy is gaining traction, where products are designed to be reused, repaired, or recycled, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.

To get more specific information about the sustainable technology of the “3560” product, I would need more context. For example:

  • What type of product is it? (e.g., laptop, appliance, vehicle)
  • Who is the manufacturer?

With more information, I can help you find details about the specific sustainable features of that product.

In the meantime, you can explore the websites of major electronics manufacturers or organizations like the EPA to learn more about general trends in sustainable technology.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3560 ?

While “3560” alone doesn’t tell us what product you’re referring to, it appears you might be thinking of the Dell Precision 3560 laptop.

If that’s the case, Dell has incorporated several sustainable features into this laptop model:

  • Bioplastics: The laptop’s lid is made with 21% bioplastic from tall oil, a byproduct of the paper-making process. This reduces reliance on traditional plastics derived from fossil fuels.
  • Recycled Plastics: The lid also contains 30% post-consumer recycled plastic, further minimizing the use of virgin materials.
  • Reclaimed Carbon Fiber: 20% of the lid is made from reclaimed carbon fiber, giving a second life to this lightweight and durable material.

These features contribute to a lower environmental impact by:

  • Reducing greenhouse gas emissions: Dell estimates that the use of these sustainable materials in the Precision 3560 series results in CO2 emissions reductions equivalent to taking millions of cars off the road.
  • Conserving energy: The production of these laptops requires less energy compared to those made entirely from virgin materials.
  • Saving water: The use of recycled and bio-based materials also helps conserve water resources.

Dell’s commitment to sustainability extends beyond the materials used in the Precision 3560. They also focus on:

  • Energy efficiency: The laptop is designed to consume less power, reducing its carbon footprint during use.
  • Recyclable packaging: Dell uses packaging made from recycled materials, minimizing waste.
  • Responsible recycling programs: Dell offers programs for customers to recycle their old electronics, ensuring proper disposal and material recovery.

Overall, the Dell Precision 3560 demonstrates how sustainability can be integrated into technology products through thoughtful material selection, energy-efficient design, and a commitment to responsible end-of-life management.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3560 ?

You’re asking a great question that gets to the heart of why sustainable technology matters! Here’s a breakdown of who benefits from the sustainable technology in the Dell Precision 3560, and why it’s important:

1. The Environment:

  • Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions: By using bioplastics, recycled plastics, and reclaimed carbon fiber, the 3560 has a smaller carbon footprint compared to laptops made with traditional materials. This helps mitigate climate change.
  • Conservation of Resources: Using recycled and bio-based materials reduces the need to extract virgin resources from the earth, conserving precious materials and ecosystems.
  • Less Waste: Designing for recyclability and offering recycling programs helps reduce electronic waste, which can be harmful to the environment if not disposed of properly.

2. Consumers:

  • Supporting Ethical Companies: By choosing a laptop with sustainable features, consumers can support companies that are taking responsibility for their environmental impact.
  • Potentially Lower Energy Costs: Energy-efficient designs can lead to lower electricity bills over the lifespan of the device.
  • Durability and Longevity: Sustainable materials can sometimes be more durable, potentially extending the lifespan of the laptop.

3. Dell (the Manufacturer):

  • Enhanced Brand Image: Companies that prioritize sustainability can improve their brand reputation and attract environmentally conscious customers.
  • Innovation and Efficiency: The pursuit of sustainable technology can drive innovation in material science and manufacturing processes, potentially leading to cost savings and more efficient production.
  • Meeting Regulatory Requirements: In some regions, there are increasing regulations regarding the environmental impact of electronics, so incorporating sustainable practices helps companies comply.

4. Society as a Whole:

  • A More Sustainable Future: By reducing our reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing waste, sustainable technology contributes to a more sustainable future for everyone.
  • Economic Benefits: Investing in sustainable technology can create new jobs and drive economic growth in green industries.

In summary, the sustainable technology in the Dell Precision 3560 benefits everyone, from the environment and individual consumers to the manufacturer and society as a whole. It’s a step towards a more responsible and sustainable approach to technology.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3560 ?

You’re right to think about when sustainable technology is needed! It’s not just a nice-to-have, but a crucial element for our future. Here’s when sustainable technology like that in the Dell Precision 3560 is absolutely essential:

  • Now: We need to be implementing sustainable practices now to address the urgent environmental challenges we face. Climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are pressing issues that require immediate action. Every product made with sustainability in mind is a step in the right direction.
  • Whenever a new product is designed or manufactured: Sustainability should be a core consideration in the design phase of any new technology. This includes:
    • Material selection: Choosing recycled, bio-based, or sustainably sourced materials.
    • Energy efficiency: Designing products that consume less energy during use.
    • Durability and repairability: Creating products that last longer and can be easily repaired, reducing the need for frequent replacements.
    • End-of-life management: Planning for responsible recycling or reuse of products at the end of their lifespan.
  • Whenever we consume or use technology: As consumers, we have a role to play by making conscious choices to support sustainable products. This could involve:
    • Choosing products with sustainable features: Looking for certifications like Energy Star or EPEAT, and considering the materials used in the product.
    • Extending the lifespan of our devices: Taking care of our electronics and repairing them when possible, rather than replacing them unnecessarily.
    • Recycling electronics responsibly: Making sure old devices are recycled through proper channels to recover valuable materials and prevent pollution.
  • Whenever we aim for a better future: Sustainable technology is not just about addressing current problems, but also about building a more sustainable future for generations to come. By embracing sustainable practices, we can:
    • Reduce our environmental impact: Minimize our carbon footprint, conserve resources, and protect ecosystems.
    • Create a circular economy: Move towards a system where resources are used more efficiently and waste is minimized.
    • Promote social responsibility: Encourage ethical manufacturing practices and support companies that prioritize sustainability.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology is constant and ongoing. It’s not a trend or a temporary solution, but a fundamental shift in how we design, manufacture, and use technology to ensure a healthy planet and a thriving society.

courtesy : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3560 ?

You’re hitting on a really important point! It’s not just when but also where sustainable technology is needed. Here’s a breakdown of where sustainable tech like that in the Dell Precision 3560 is essential:

  • In the manufacturing process: This is where it all begins. Sustainable technology is crucial in:
    • Sourcing materials: Choosing recycled, bio-based, or sustainably sourced materials for components.
    • Manufacturing processes: Reducing energy consumption, minimizing waste, and avoiding harmful chemicals during production.
    • Packaging: Using recycled and recyclable packaging materials.
  • In the design of the product itself: This is where the features of the Dell Precision 3560 come in:
    • Material selection: Using bioplastics, recycled plastics, and reclaimed carbon fiber, as Dell does in this model.
    • Energy efficiency: Designing laptops that consume less power during use.
    • Durability and repairability: Making products that last longer and can be easily repaired, reducing the need for replacements.
  • In the use of the product: Even after it’s sold, sustainable technology plays a role:
    • Energy-saving features: Laptops with features like power-saving modes and efficient processors help reduce energy consumption during use.
    • Responsible use: Consumers can contribute by using their devices efficiently and extending their lifespan.
  • At the end of the product’s life: Sustainable technology is needed for:
    • Recycling and reuse: Designing products that can be easily disassembled and recycled, recovering valuable materials.
    • E-waste management: Implementing responsible recycling programs to prevent harmful disposal of electronic waste.
  • In all sectors and industries: While we’re talking about laptops, sustainable technology is needed everywhere:
    • Transportation: Electric vehicles, more fuel-efficient engines, and sustainable aviation fuels.
    • Energy: Renewable energy sources like solar and wind power, and energy-efficient buildings.
    • Agriculture: Sustainable farming practices that reduce environmental impact and conserve resources.
    • Healthcare: Eco-friendly medical equipment and practices that minimize waste and pollution.

Essentially, sustainable technology is required everywhere we design, manufacture, use, and dispose of products and services. It’s a fundamental shift in how we approach technology and a key to creating a more sustainable future for our planet.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3560 ?

That’s a great question that gets to the core of how sustainability is implemented in a product like the Dell Precision 3560! Here’s a breakdown of how sustainable technology is “required” or integrated into this laptop:

1. Material Selection:

  • Bioplastics: The lid of the 3560 uses bioplastics derived from tall oil, a byproduct of the paper-making process. This replaces traditional petroleum-based plastics, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Recycled Plastics: The lid also incorporates post-consumer recycled plastic, giving a second life to existing plastic waste and reducing the need for virgin plastic production.
  • Reclaimed Carbon Fiber: 20% of the lid is made from reclaimed carbon fiber, which is sourced from industrial waste or recycled products. This reduces the demand for newly produced carbon fiber, which can be energy-intensive to manufacture.

2. Design for Energy Efficiency:

  • Efficient Components: The 3560 is designed with energy-efficient components, such as processors and displays, that consume less power during use.
  • Power Management: The laptop likely includes features like power-saving modes and optimized software to further reduce energy consumption.

3. Manufacturing Processes:

  • Dell’s Sustainability Initiatives: Dell has company-wide initiatives to reduce the environmental impact of its manufacturing processes, including efforts to minimize waste, conserve energy, and use renewable energy sources.

4. Product Lifecycle Management:

  • Recyclable Packaging: The 3560 likely comes in packaging made from recycled and recyclable materials, reducing waste and promoting a circular economy.
  • Recycling Programs: Dell offers recycling programs for customers to responsibly dispose of their old electronics, ensuring proper handling and material recovery.

5. Certifications and Standards:

  • EPEAT and Energy Star: The Dell Precision 3560 may have certifications like EPEAT and Energy Star, which indicate that it meets certain environmental performance criteria.

In essence, sustainable technology is “required” in the 3560 through:

  • Conscious material choices: Using recycled, renewable, and less impactful materials.
  • Energy-efficient design: Optimizing the product to minimize energy consumption during use.
  • Responsible manufacturing: Implementing practices to reduce the environmental footprint of production.
  • End-of-life considerations: Designing for recyclability and offering recycling programs to ensure proper disposal and resource recovery.

By integrating these elements, Dell aims to reduce the overall environmental impact of the Precision 3560 throughout its entire lifecycle, from material sourcing to end-of-life management.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3560 ?

While a full-fledged, formal case study on the Dell Precision 3560’s sustainability might not be readily available, we can definitely construct a case study outline based on the information we have, highlighting its key aspects and potential impact.

Case Study: Sustainability in the Dell Precision 3560

1. Introduction:

  • Briefly introduce Dell and its commitment to sustainability.
  • State the purpose of the case study: to examine the sustainable features of the Dell Precision 3560 and their potential impact.
  • Provide a brief overview of the Precision 3560 laptop and its target audience (professionals in design, engineering, etc.).

2. Background:

  • Discuss the growing importance of sustainability in the technology industry.
  • Highlight the environmental challenges associated with electronics manufacturing and disposal.
  • Briefly touch upon Dell’s broader sustainability goals and initiatives.

3. Sustainable Features of the Precision 3560:

  • Material Innovation:
    • Detail the use of bioplastics derived from tall oil in the laptop’s lid.
    • Explain the benefits of using recycled plastics and reclaimed carbon fiber.
    • Quantify the percentage of recycled and bio-based materials used in the laptop.
  • Energy Efficiency:
    • Describe the energy-efficient components and design features of the 3560.
    • Mention any certifications like Energy Star or EPEAT that the laptop may have.
  • Responsible Manufacturing:
    • Discuss Dell’s efforts to minimize waste, conserve energy, and use renewable energy in its manufacturing processes.
  • Product Lifecycle Management:
    • Highlight the use of recyclable packaging materials.
    • Mention Dell’s recycling programs for old electronics.

4. Potential Impact:

  • Environmental Benefits:
    • Estimate the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the use of sustainable materials.
    • Discuss the conservation of resources achieved through recycling and bio-based plastics.
    • Analyze the potential reduction in electronic waste due to responsible recycling programs.
  • Business Benefits:
    • Explore how sustainability initiatives can enhance Dell’s brand image and attract environmentally conscious customers.
    • Discuss potential cost savings through resource efficiency and waste reduction.
  • Social Benefits:
    • Highlight the contribution to a more sustainable future and a circular economy.
    • Discuss the potential for job creation in green industries.

5. Challenges and Opportunities:

  • Discuss any challenges Dell might face in implementing sustainable practices (e.g., cost, material availability).
  • Explore opportunities for further improvements in the 3560’s sustainability (e.g., increased use of recycled materials, longer product lifespan).

6. Conclusion:

  • Summarize the key sustainable features of the Dell Precision 3560.
  • Reiterate the potential environmental, business, and social benefits of these features.
  • Emphasize the importance of sustainable technology in the electronics industry and beyond.

7. Recommendations:

  • Offer recommendations for consumers to make more sustainable choices when purchasing electronics.
  • Suggest ways for Dell and other manufacturers to further advance sustainability in their products and operations.

This outline provides a framework for a comprehensive case study on the Dell Precision 3560’s sustainability. While specific data and figures might require further research, this structure allows for a thorough examination of its key features and their potential impact.

courtesy : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3560 ?

Creating a full white paper requires in-depth research and data, but I can give you a structured outline and suggest the kind of content that would typically be included in a white paper on the Dell Precision 3560’s sustainability. This will help you or someone with access to Dell’s data to create a more complete document.

White Paper: A Deep Dive into the Sustainable Technology of the Dell Precision 3560

Abstract: (Brief overview of the white paper’s purpose, key findings, and conclusions)

1. Introduction:

  • The Growing Importance of Sustainability in Technology: Discuss the increasing awareness of environmental issues and the pressure on the tech industry to adopt sustainable practices. Mention global trends and regulations.
  • Dell’s Commitment to Sustainability: Briefly outline Dell’s overall sustainability vision, goals, and initiatives. Reference any relevant reports or public commitments.
  • Focus on the Precision 3560: Introduce the Dell Precision 3560 as a case study in sustainable laptop design, emphasizing its target audience (professionals needing performance and sustainability).

2. The Environmental Imperative:

  • The Footprint of Electronics: Describe the environmental impact of electronics manufacturing, including resource depletion, energy consumption, and e-waste generation. Cite relevant statistics.
  • The Need for Sustainable Solutions: Emphasize the urgency of addressing these challenges and the role of sustainable technology in mitigating them.

3. Sustainable Design and Features of the Precision 3560:

  • Material Innovation:
    • Bioplastics: Detail the use of bioplastics derived from tall oil, explaining the sourcing, benefits (reduced reliance on fossil fuels), and percentage used in the laptop. Include lifecycle assessment (LCA) data if available.
    • Recycled Plastics: Explain the source of the recycled plastics used, the recycling process, and the percentage incorporated. Discuss the impact on reducing plastic waste.
    • Reclaimed Carbon Fiber: Describe the process of reclaiming carbon fiber, its benefits (lightweight, durable), and the percentage used. Compare its environmental impact to virgin carbon fiber production.
  • Energy Efficiency:
    • Hardware Optimization: Discuss energy-efficient components (processors, displays, memory) and their impact on power consumption. Provide specific data on power usage and improvements.
    • Software and Power Management: Describe any software features or power management tools that contribute to energy savings.
    • Certifications: Highlight any certifications achieved, such as Energy Star or EPEAT, and explain their significance.
  • Responsible Manufacturing:
    • Dell’s Manufacturing Practices: Detail Dell’s efforts to minimize waste, conserve energy, and use renewable energy in its manufacturing facilities. Include data on energy consumption and waste reduction in their operations.
    • Supply Chain Sustainability: Discuss Dell’s engagement with its suppliers to promote sustainable practices throughout the supply chain.
  • Product Lifecycle Management:
    • Packaging: Describe the sustainable packaging used for the 3560, including materials and recyclability.
    • Recycling Programs: Explain Dell’s recycling programs for end-of-life electronics, emphasizing the process and benefits. Provide data on recycling rates.
    • Durability and Repairability: Discuss design features that contribute to the laptop’s durability and ease of repair, extending its lifespan.

4. Quantifying the Impact:

  • Environmental Benefits:
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction: Provide data on the estimated reduction in greenhouse gas emissions due to the sustainable materials and energy efficiency of the 3560.
    • Resource Conservation: Quantify the amount of resources saved (e.g., oil, water) through the use of recycled and bio-based materials.
    • Waste Reduction: Estimate the reduction in electronic waste due to recycling programs and design for recyclability.
  • Comparative Analysis: (Optional but valuable) Compare the 3560’s environmental footprint to a comparable laptop made with traditional materials.

5. Challenges and Future Directions:

  • Challenges: Discuss any challenges Dell faces in implementing sustainable practices (e.g., cost, material availability, scaling up sustainable manufacturing).
  • Future Opportunities: Explore potential future improvements in the 3560’s sustainability (e.g., increased use of recycled materials, closed-loop recycling systems, further energy efficiency gains).

6. Conclusion:

  • Summary of Key Findings: Recap the key sustainable features and their impact.
  • The Importance of Sustainable Technology: Reiterate the importance of sustainable technology in addressing environmental challenges and building a circular economy.

7. Call to Action: (Optional)

  • Encourage other companies and consumers to adopt sustainable practices.

8. Appendix: (Include any supporting data, charts, graphs, and references)

This structure provides a comprehensive framework for a white paper. Remember that a true white paper requires credible data and research to support its claims. Dell would be the best source for much of the specific data related to the 3560.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3560 ?

You’re asking about how the sustainable technology in the Dell Precision 3560 translates to real-world industrial applications. Here’s how it makes a difference:

1. Reduced Environmental Impact in Manufacturing:

  • Supply Chain: Companies that use laptops like the 3560 are indirectly supporting a more sustainable supply chain. Dell’s use of recycled and bio-based materials encourages responsible sourcing and reduces the demand for virgin resources, which benefits industries that extract these materials.
  • Lower Carbon Footprint: By choosing laptops with a smaller carbon footprint, businesses contribute to reducing their overall environmental impact. This is particularly important for industries with large IT departments or those aiming to achieve sustainability targets.

2. Supporting Green Initiatives:

  • Corporate Social Responsibility: Many companies have corporate social responsibility (CSR) goals that include reducing their environmental impact. Using sustainable technology like the 3560 helps them achieve these goals and demonstrate their commitment to sustainability.
  • Environmental Certifications: Some industries require or prefer products with environmental certifications like EPEAT or Energy Star. The 3560’s potential certifications make it a suitable choice for these businesses.

3. Enhancing Brand Image:

  • Sustainability-Conscious Companies: Companies that prioritize sustainability often want to align their operations with their values. Using sustainable technology helps them project an image of environmental responsibility to their customers and stakeholders.
  • Attracting Talent: Increasingly, employees, especially younger generations, are drawn to companies that are environmentally conscious. Using sustainable technology can help companies attract and retain top talent who share these values.

4. Long-Term Cost Savings:

  • Energy Efficiency: While the initial cost of a sustainable laptop might be comparable to others, its energy-efficient design can lead to cost savings over its lifespan through reduced electricity consumption. This can be significant for large organizations with many devices.
  • Durability: Sustainable materials can sometimes be more durable, leading to longer product lifespans and reducing the need for frequent replacements, which can save money in the long run.

5. Promoting a Circular Economy:

  • Recycling and Reuse: By choosing laptops designed for recyclability and supporting recycling programs, businesses contribute to a circular economy where resources are used more efficiently and waste is minimized. This is important for industries that are looking to reduce their environmental footprint and embrace sustainable practices.

Specific Industrial Applications:

  • Engineering and Design: Industries that rely heavily on computers for design and engineering work, such as architecture, construction, and manufacturing, can benefit from using sustainable workstations like the 3560.
  • Technology Companies: Tech companies themselves have a responsibility to lead by example in sustainability. Using sustainable laptops in their operations aligns with their values and demonstrates their commitment to environmental responsibility.
  • Government and Public Sector: Government agencies and public institutions are increasingly focused on sustainability. Using sustainable technology helps them meet their environmental targets and demonstrate responsible use of taxpayer money.

In conclusion, the sustainable technology in the Dell Precision 3560 has various industrial applications, from reducing environmental impact and supporting green initiatives to enhancing brand image and promoting a circular economy. By choosing sustainable technology, businesses can contribute to a more sustainable future while also realizing potential cost savings and other benefits.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3560 ?

You’re interested in the behind-the-scenes work that makes the Dell Precision 3560 more sustainable! Here’s a look at the research and development that likely went into its sustainable technology:

1. Material Science and Innovation:

  • Bioplastics Research: Dell likely researched and tested various bio-based materials to find a suitable replacement for traditional plastics. This involves evaluating factors like durability, heat resistance, and cost-effectiveness.
  • Recycled Plastics Sourcing: Researching and establishing reliable sources for high-quality post-consumer recycled plastics is crucial. This includes ensuring the recycled plastic meets Dell’s quality standards and can be effectively integrated into the manufacturing process.
  • Reclaimed Carbon Fiber Technology: Developing and refining the process for reclaiming carbon fiber from waste streams requires significant R&D. This involves finding efficient ways to separate and process the carbon fiber while maintaining its quality and strength.

2. Sustainable Design and Engineering:

  • Energy Efficiency Optimization: Dell’s engineers likely conducted extensive research and testing to optimize the 3560’s hardware and software for energy efficiency. This involves selecting energy-saving components, developing power management algorithms, and minimizing power consumption in various usage scenarios.
  • Design for Durability and Repairability: Researching and implementing design features that enhance the laptop’s durability and make it easier to repair is essential. This involves selecting robust materials, designing modular components, and providing clear repair instructions.

3. Manufacturing Process Improvements:

  • Waste Reduction Techniques: Dell likely invests in R&D to improve its manufacturing processes and minimize waste generation. This can involve optimizing production lines, implementing closed-loop recycling systems, and finding ways to reuse or repurpose manufacturing byproducts.
  • Renewable Energy Integration: Researching and implementing ways to power manufacturing facilities with renewable energy sources is a key focus for Dell. This can involve investing in on-site solar or wind power installations, or purchasing renewable energy certificates.

4. Product Lifecycle Assessment:

  • Environmental Impact Analysis: Dell likely conducts lifecycle assessments (LCAs) to evaluate the environmental impact of the 3560 throughout its entire lifespan, from material extraction to end-of-life management. This data helps identify areas for improvement and guide future sustainability efforts.
  • End-of-Life Solutions: Researching and developing effective solutions for end-of-life management is crucial. This includes designing for recyclability, establishing recycling programs, and exploring ways to recover valuable materials from old devices.

5. Collaboration and Partnerships:

  • Industry Collaboration: Dell likely collaborates with other companies, research institutions, and organizations to advance sustainable technology in the electronics industry. This can involve sharing best practices, developing new materials, and working on industry-wide sustainability initiatives.
  • Supplier Engagement: Dell works with its suppliers to promote sustainable practices throughout the supply chain. This can involve setting environmental standards for suppliers, providing training and support, and encouraging the use of recycled and sustainable materials.

In summary, the research and development of sustainable technology in the Dell Precision 3560 involves a multidisciplinary approach, encompassing material science, engineering, manufacturing, and product lifecycle management. Dell likely invests in ongoing R&D to improve the sustainability of its products and contribute to a more environmentally responsible technology industry.

courtesy : Voith Group

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »