Sustainable Technology of 3520

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 3520 / By
81 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3520 ?

Unfortunately, there is no widely known or recognized technology specifically associated with the number “3520” in the context of sustainability.

However, the concept of sustainable technology is broad and encompasses various fields. Here are some key areas and examples of sustainable technologies:

  • Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and biomass energy technologies are crucial for reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Energy Efficiency: Technologies that improve energy efficiency in buildings, transportation, and industries, such as LED lighting, smart grids, and insulation materials.
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Practices and technologies that promote food production while minimizing environmental impact, such as precision farming, organic farming, and vertical farming.
  • Water Management: Technologies for water conservation, purification, and wastewater treatment, such as rainwater harvesting, desalination, and drip irrigation.
  • Waste Management: Solutions for reducing waste generation, promoting recycling and composting, and converting waste into energy.
  • Green Building: Design and construction practices that minimize environmental impact and maximize energy efficiency, resource conservation, and occupant health.
  • Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and public transportation systems that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.

While “3520” doesn’t represent a specific technology, the broader field of sustainable technology is constantly evolving with new innovations and solutions to address environmental challenges and promote a more sustainable future.

If you have any other questions or need more information about specific sustainable technologies, feel free to ask!

What is Sustainable Technology of 3520 ?

It seems you might be encountering a misunderstanding or a lack of specific information regarding “Sustainable Technology of 3520”.

Unfortunately, there is no widely recognized technology specifically associated with the number “3520” in the context of sustainability. It’s possible that this number refers to:

  • A specific model number of a product: It could be a model number of a laptop, a piece of equipment, or some other device that incorporates sustainable features. In this case, you would need to provide more context about the product to understand its sustainable aspects.
  • A code or designation within a specific industry or organization: Some companies or industries might use specific codes or numbers to refer to internal projects or initiatives related to sustainability. Without more information, it’s difficult to determine the exact meaning.
  • A misinterpretation or confusion: It’s also possible that the number “3520” is not directly related to sustainable technology, or that there might be some confusion or misinterpretation.

However, the concept of sustainable technology is broad and encompasses various fields. Here are some key areas and examples of sustainable technologies:

  • Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and biomass energy technologies are crucial for reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Energy Efficiency: Technologies that improve energy efficiency in buildings, transportation, and industries, such as LED lighting, smart grids, and insulation materials.
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Practices and technologies that promote food production while minimizing environmental impact, such as precision farming, organic farming, and vertical farming.
  • Water Management: Technologies for water conservation, purification, and wastewater treatment, such as rainwater harvesting, desalination, and drip irrigation.
  • Waste Management: Solutions for reducing waste generation, promoting recycling and composting, and converting waste into energy.
  • Green Building: Design and construction practices that minimize environmental impact and maximize energy efficiency, resource conservation, and occupant health.
  • Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and public transportation systems that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.

If you can provide more context about where you encountered the term “Sustainable Technology of 3520”, I might be able to provide a more specific answer.

In the meantime, if you have any other questions or need more information about specific sustainable technologies, feel free to ask!

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3520 ?

It appears there’s still some confusion around “Sustainable Technology of 3520”.

It’s highly likely that “3520” is not related to a specific, recognized sustainable technology.

It might be:

  • A product or model number: If you encountered this in the context of a specific product (like a laptop, appliance, etc.), it might simply be the model number. You’d need more information about the product itself to know if it has any sustainable features.
  • An internal code or designation: Some organizations might use codes for projects. Without context, it’s impossible to know if this relates to sustainability.

However, everyone can benefit from and should be involved in using and developing sustainable technology. This includes:

  • Individuals: We can make sustainable choices in our daily lives (energy-efficient appliances, reducing waste, etc.)
  • Businesses: Companies have a huge role in adopting sustainable practices, developing green technologies, and minimizing their environmental impact.
  • Governments: Policies and regulations are crucial to incentivize and enforce sustainable practices.
  • Researchers and Innovators: Developing new sustainable technologies is essential for a greener future.

Since “3520” is unlikely to be a specific technology, it’s more helpful to focus on the broader field of sustainable technology, which is relevant to everyone.

If you have any other questions about sustainable technology in general, feel free to ask! I can provide information on various areas like renewable energy, green building, sustainable agriculture, and more.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3520 ?

As we’ve discussed, “Sustainable Technology of 3520” is very likely not a recognized or specific technology. Therefore, it’s not something that’s “required” at any particular time. It’s more likely a misinterpretation, a product number, or an internal code.

However, the need for sustainable technology in general is now and ongoing. The challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and pollution make it essential to adopt and develop sustainable solutions as quickly as possible.

So, while “3520” probably isn’t a thing, the principles of sustainable technology are always required. We need sustainable solutions in:

  • Energy: Moving away from fossil fuels to renewable sources like solar, wind, and hydro.
  • Transportation: Developing electric vehicles and improving public transport.
  • Agriculture: Producing food in ways that minimize environmental impact.
  • Manufacturing: Creating products with less waste and using recycled materials.
  • Construction: Building energy-efficient and environmentally friendly buildings.

The need for these sustainable solutions is constant and urgent. If you have any other questions about specific sustainable technologies or practices, please ask!

COURTESY : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3520 ?

As we’ve established, “Sustainable Technology of 3520” is almost certainly not a real, recognized technology. Therefore, it’s not “required” anywhere. It’s likely a misinterpretation, a product number, or an internal code.

However, the need for sustainable technology in general is everywhere. Sustainable solutions are required across all sectors and in all locations. Here are some examples:

  • Homes: Energy-efficient appliances, solar panels, water conservation measures.
  • Businesses: Sustainable manufacturing processes, reduced waste, renewable energy use.
  • Cities: Public transportation, green buildings, waste management systems.
  • Rural areas: Sustainable agriculture, renewable energy for remote communities.
  • Developing countries: Access to clean water, affordable renewable energy, sustainable agriculture.

The need for sustainable technology is global and affects everyone. It’s not limited to any specific place. If you have questions about real sustainable technologies relevant to a particular area or industry, I’d be happy to help.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3520 ?

It seems we’re still running into a misunderstanding about “Sustainable Technology of 3520”. It’s highly unlikely that this refers to a specific technology. It’s probably a product number, code, or misinterpretation.

However, let’s talk about how sustainable technology in general is required. It’s not a single thing, but a way of thinking and acting that needs to be integrated into everything we do. Here’s how it’s required:

  • By individuals: We need to adopt sustainable practices in our daily lives:
    • Reducing energy consumption at home
    • Choosing sustainable transportation options
    • Minimizing waste and recycling
    • Making conscious consumer choices
  • By businesses: Companies need to prioritize sustainability in their operations:
    • Developing and using green technologies
    • Reducing their environmental footprint
    • Implementing sustainable supply chains
    • Investing in renewable energy
  • By governments: Policies and regulations are essential to drive sustainable practices:
    • Setting environmental standards
    • Incentivizing green technologies
    • Investing in sustainable infrastructure
    • Promoting international cooperation
  • By researchers and innovators: Continuous development of new sustainable technologies is crucial:
    • Renewable energy sources
    • Energy-efficient materials and processes
    • Sustainable agriculture techniques
    • Solutions for waste management

Sustainable technology is not just about having a specific “thing” called “3520”. It’s about a fundamental shift in how we live and work, requiring action from everyone, everywhere.

If you have any questions about real sustainable technologies or how you can contribute to a more sustainable future, please ask! I’m here to provide information and help.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3520 ?

As we’ve discussed repeatedly, “Sustainable Technology of 3520” is almost certainly not a real, recognized technology. Therefore, there cannot be a case study of it. It’s likely a misunderstanding, a product number, or an internal code unrelated to a specific technology.

However, we can discuss case studies about sustainable technology in general. Here’s how case studies are used in the context of sustainable technology:

Case studies are valuable tools for understanding the real-world application and impact of sustainable technologies. They provide in-depth analyses of specific projects, initiatives, or companies that have implemented sustainable practices. A good case study will usually cover:

  • The problem or challenge: What environmental or sustainability issue was being addressed?
  • The solution: What sustainable technology or approach was implemented?
  • The results: What were the outcomes in terms of environmental impact, cost savings, social benefits, etc.?
  • Lessons learned: What were the key takeaways and insights from the project?

Here are some examples of the kinds of sustainable technology case studies that exist (remember, these are not about “3520”):

  • A company implementing solar power: A case study might examine how a manufacturing company installed solar panels on its roof, the cost savings achieved, the reduction in carbon emissions, and the challenges faced during the installation process.
  • A city developing a sustainable transportation system: A case study could analyze how a city implemented a network of electric buses, the impact on air quality, the public’s response, and the economic implications.
  • A farmer adopting sustainable agriculture practices: A case study might explore how a farmer switched to organic farming methods, the changes in crop yields, the impact on soil health, and the market for organic products.
  • A building being designed to LEED standards: A case study could examine how a new office building incorporated energy-efficient design, water conservation measures, and the use of sustainable materials, and the building’s performance over time.

If you’re interested in learning more about real-world examples of sustainable technology in action, I can provide you with links to case studies on specific topics. Just let me know what areas you’d like to explore (e.g., renewable energy, green building, sustainable agriculture).

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3520 ?

Unfortunately, as we’ve discussed, “Sustainable Technology of 3520” is almost certainly not a real, recognized technology. Therefore, there cannot be a white paper on it. It’s likely a misunderstanding, a product number, or an internal code.

However, we can discuss what a white paper on sustainable technology in general might look like. White papers are authoritative reports that provide in-depth information and analysis on a specific topic. A white paper on sustainable technology might cover the following:

  • Overview of sustainable technology: Defining what sustainable technology is, its importance, and its various applications.
  • Key challenges and opportunities: Discussing the environmental challenges that sustainable technology aims to address, as well as the opportunities for innovation and growth in this field.
  • Specific technologies and solutions: Examining different types of sustainable technologies, such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, green building, sustainable agriculture, and waste management.
  • Case studies and examples: Showcasing real-world examples of how sustainable technologies have been implemented and the positive impacts they have achieved.
  • Policy and regulatory frameworks: Discussing the role of governments in promoting sustainable technology through policies, regulations, and incentives.
  • Future trends and directions: Exploring emerging trends in sustainable technology and the potential for future innovations.
  • Recommendations and conclusions: Providing recommendations for individuals, businesses, and governments on how to promote and adopt sustainable technology.

White papers on sustainable technology are often published by:

  • Research institutions: To share findings and insights from academic studies.
  • Industry associations: To provide information and guidance to their members.
  • Government agencies: To inform policy development and promote sustainable practices.
  • Consulting firms: To offer expertise and advice to businesses and organizations.

While a white paper on “Sustainable Technology of 3520” is not possible, I can help you find white papers on specific areas of sustainable technology that you are interested in. Just let me know what topics you’d like to explore!

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3520 ?

It seems we’re still encountering a misunderstanding about “Sustainable Technology of 3520”. It’s highly likely that this refers to a product number, code, or misinterpretation, and not a specific technology.

However, let’s discuss the industrial applications of sustainable technology in general. Industries across all sectors are increasingly adopting sustainable technologies to reduce their environmental impact, improve efficiency, and enhance their reputation. Here are some key areas:

  • Manufacturing:
    • Energy efficiency: Implementing energy-efficient machinery, optimizing processes to reduce energy consumption, and using renewable energy sources like solar or wind power.
    • Waste reduction: Minimizing waste generation through process optimization, recycling, and reusing materials.
    • Sustainable materials: Using recycled or sustainably sourced materials in manufacturing processes.
    • Green chemistry: Designing chemical processes that minimize the use and generation of hazardous substances.
  • Energy:
    • Renewable energy: Investing in renewable energy sources like solar, wind, hydro, and biomass to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
    • Smart grids: Developing smart grid technologies to optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.
    • Energy storage: Implementing energy storage solutions to improve the reliability and efficiency of renewable energy systems.
  • Transportation:
    • Electric vehicles: Transitioning to electric vehicle fleets for transportation and logistics.
    • Fuel efficiency: Improving fuel efficiency in traditional vehicles through technological advancements.
    • Sustainable logistics: Optimizing logistics and supply chains to reduce fuel consumption and emissions.
  • Construction:
    • Green building: Designing and constructing buildings that are energy-efficient, use sustainable materials, and minimize environmental impact.
    • Sustainable infrastructure: Developing sustainable infrastructure for transportation, energy, and water management.
  • Agriculture:
    • Precision farming: Using technology to optimize resource use in agriculture, such as water, fertilizers, and pesticides.
    • Organic farming: Adopting organic farming practices that minimize environmental impact and promote soil health.
    • Vertical farming: Developing vertical farming systems to increase food production in urban areas while reducing land and water use.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology is being applied in various industries. The specific applications will vary depending on the industry and its unique challenges and opportunities.

While “Sustainable Technology of 3520” is likely not a real technology, the broader field of sustainable technology is constantly evolving and offering new solutions for industries to reduce their environmental impact and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3520 ?

As we’ve discussed several times, “Sustainable Technology of 3520” is almost certainly not a real, recognized technology, so there is no research and development specifically of it. It’s likely a misunderstanding, product number, or code.

However, research and development in sustainable technology in general is a very active and important field. Here are some key areas of research and development:

  • Renewable Energy: Improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and biomass energy technologies. This includes research on new materials for solar panels, advanced turbine designs for wind power, and more efficient ways to harness geothermal energy.
  • Energy Storage: Developing better batteries and other energy storage solutions to address the intermittency of renewable energy sources. This is crucial for storing energy when it’s plentiful and using it when it’s needed.
  • Energy Efficiency: Creating more energy-efficient appliances, building materials, and industrial processes. This includes research on new insulation materials, smart grids for managing energy distribution, and more efficient lighting technologies.
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Developing new methods for producing food with less environmental impact. This includes research on precision farming techniques, organic farming methods, and vertical farming systems.
  • Water Management: Finding innovative ways to conserve water, purify water, and treat wastewater. This includes research on new filtration technologies, desalination methods, and water-efficient irrigation systems.
  • Waste Management: Developing new solutions for reducing waste generation, promoting recycling and composting, and converting waste into energy. This includes research on new materials that are easier to recycle, more efficient composting systems, and technologies for converting waste into biofuels.
  • Green Building: Designing and constructing buildings that are more energy-efficient, use sustainable materials, and have a lower environmental impact. This includes research on new building materials, improved insulation techniques, and smart building management systems.
  • Sustainable Transportation: Developing electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and other sustainable transportation technologies. This includes research on better batteries for electric vehicles, more efficient fuel cells, and new forms of public transportation.

Research and development in sustainable technology is crucial for addressing the challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. It requires collaboration between scientists, engineers, businesses, and governments to develop and deploy new and innovative solutions.

If you’d like to explore research in a specific area of sustainable technology, please let me know, and I can provide you with more information and resources.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »