Sustainable Technology of 3490

Sustainable Technology of 3490 ?

It looks like you might be referring to a specific technology or model, but could you clarify what you mean by “Sustainable Technology of 3490”? If you’re referring to a product, system, or standard with that designation, I can provide more targeted information.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3490 ?

It seems there may be some confusion, as “Sustainable Technology of 3490” does not appear to directly reference a well-known or widely recognized concept, model, or product. However, it’s possible that “3490” might refer to a product number, model, or standard related to sustainable technology. If you can provide more context—such as the industry, field, or specific technology you’re referring to—I can help provide more detailed information.

If it’s related to a specific standard, like an ISO standard or product designation, I can look further into that. Let me know if you have any more details!

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3490 ?

It appears that “Sustainable Technology of 3490” might be referencing a specific technology, standard, or product, but without additional context, it’s unclear what exactly it refers to. If you are asking about a certain standard (such as a specific ISO, product, or environmental technology) with the number 3490, or a particular industry or sector that requires it, I would need more information to provide an accurate answer.

For instance, some industries, such as construction, energy, or manufacturing, may be required to adopt sustainable technologies to meet environmental standards, reduce carbon footprints, or comply with regulations. In these cases, specific technologies, standards, or certifications may be required depending on the sector.

Could you clarify whether this refers to a specific industry, product, or certification, or any other details you have? This would help narrow down the information you’re seeking!

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3490 ?

It seems there might be a misunderstanding or lack of clarity around the term “Sustainable Technology of 3490.” There doesn’t appear to be a widely known standard or technology specifically referred to as “3490” in relation to sustainability.

However, if you’re asking about when sustainable technology or practices are required, here are a few general scenarios where sustainable technologies might be mandated:

1. Environmental Regulations: Various countries and industries require sustainable technologies to comply with environmental regulations, such as emission limits, waste reduction, energy efficiency, and conservation efforts.
2. Industry Certifications: In sectors like manufacturing, construction, or energy, companies might be required to implement sustainable technologies to meet certification standards like ISO 14001 (Environmental Management) or ISO 50001 (Energy Management).
3. Government Mandates: Governments often require certain technologies or practices to be adopted for sustainability. For instance, in the energy sector, renewable energy solutions (solar, wind, etc.) may be mandated as part of a country’s energy policy.
4. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Many businesses adopt sustainable technologies to fulfill CSR objectives, reduce environmental impact, and meet consumer demand for green products.
5. Investment and Funding: Green technologies are increasingly a criterion for investments, grants, and funding, especially in sectors like construction, transport, and agriculture, where sustainability is a growing focus.

If you are referring to a specific technology, product, or standard with the term “3490,” please provide more details so I can assist you more effectively!

courtesy :RBC

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3490 ?

It seems that the term “Sustainable Technology of 3490” might not be referring to a widely recognized standard, technology, or product. If you are referring to a specific context, such as an industry, location, or product, where this term is used, it would be helpful to clarify that.

In general, sustainable technology is required in many different sectors and locations, including but not limited to:

1. Energy Sector: Countries and regions with a strong focus on renewable energy and reducing carbon footprints, such as Europe, the United States, and parts of Asia, require sustainable energy technologies like solar, wind, and hydroelectric power.
2. Manufacturing and Construction: Companies around the world are adopting sustainable building materials, energy-efficient machinery, and waste-reduction technologies, especially in countries with strong environmental regulations like the European Union, Canada, and Japan.
3. Agriculture: Regions aiming to reduce environmental impact are integrating sustainable agricultural technologies, including precision farming, organic practices, and water-saving irrigation systems.
4. Corporate Sustainability Initiatives: Many companies in various industries (such as tech, automotive, and retail) are adopting sustainable technologies to meet their corporate social responsibility goals. These technologies help companies reduce waste, energy use, and environmental impact.
5. Regulated Areas: Countries with strict environmental regulations often require sustainable technologies in sectors such as waste management, water purification, and air quality control. For example, in places with comprehensive environmental laws like Scandinavian countries or the EU, companies are often mandated to adopt technologies that reduce pollution and improve resource efficiency.

If “Sustainable Technology of 3490” refers to a particular regulation, product, or technology, clarifying that would help pinpoint exactly where and when it’s required. Could you provide more details or context?

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3490 ?

It seems like “Sustainable Technology of 3490” may still refer to something specific that isn’t clearly identifiable in common technology or regulatory terms. Without more specific information about what “3490” refers to in the context of sustainable technology, it’s difficult to answer definitively.

However, if we broaden the question to how sustainable technology is required in various sectors, here are a few ways it might be implemented:

1. Regulatory Compliance: Many countries require sustainable technologies as part of their environmental laws or regulations. For example:
   • Energy Efficiency Standards: Buildings and industries must adopt energy-efficient technologies (LED lighting, energy-saving HVAC systems, etc.) to meet government standards.
   • Emission Control: Industries, particularly those in manufacturing, power generation, and transportation, may be required to adopt technologies that reduce their carbon emissions, like carbon capture and storage (CCS) or electric vehicles.
2. Cost-Effectiveness: Sustainable technologies can be required to reduce operational costs in the long run. For instance:
   • Solar panels or wind energy systems may be required for businesses or homes to reduce electricity bills.
   • Waste management technologies like composting or recycling systems may be adopted to cut down waste disposal costs.
3. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Many businesses adopt sustainable technologies to improve their public image, appeal to environmentally conscious consumers, and meet the expectations of stakeholders. For example:
   • Businesses in consumer goods, manufacturing, or technology sectors may be required to adopt sustainable practices to meet the ethical expectations of customers and investors.
4. International Standards: Companies may need to adopt sustainable technologies to meet international standards such as ISO 14001 (Environmental Management Systems) or ISO 50001 (Energy Management). These standards require companies to demonstrate their commitment to environmental sustainability, and the use of green technologies is often a key part of compliance.
5. Investor Requirements: Investors increasingly seek companies that are focused on sustainability. If a company is involved in industries like energy, agriculture, or construction, it might be required to use sustainable technology to attract investment.

If you’re referring to a specific standard, product, or technology under the designation “3490”, any additional details would be helpful to narrow down the context and provide more specific guidance!

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3490 ?

It seems that there may be some confusion surrounding “Sustainable Technology of 3490.” If you’re referring to a case study or a specific technology or standard identified by “3490,” it would be helpful to clarify the context further. Based on the information provided, it seems like “3490” could potentially be a reference number, product code, or standard related to sustainable technology, but without additional details, it’s hard to pinpoint exactly what that refers to.

However, if you’re looking for examples of case studies related to sustainable technologies, I can certainly help with that! Many industries have adopted sustainable technologies, and numerous case studies have been published on how these technologies have been implemented. Some notable examples include:

1. Renewable Energy in Iceland (Geothermal & Hydropower):

• Technology: Geothermal energy and hydropower.
• Sustainability Focus: Iceland has been a leader in the use of renewable energy, with almost 100% of its electricity generated from geothermal and hydropower sources.
• Impact: The shift to renewable energy has greatly reduced the country’s carbon footprint, making Iceland one of the most environmentally sustainable countries in the world.

2. Tesla’s Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Solar Roof:

• Technology: Electric vehicles (EVs) and solar energy solutions.
• Sustainability Focus: Tesla’s EVs aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by replacing internal combustion engine vehicles with zero-emission vehicles. Additionally, their solar roof technology is designed to harness renewable solar energy to power homes and businesses.
• Impact: Tesla’s technologies have significantly contributed to the push for clean energy and a sustainable transportation future.

3. Interface Inc. – Sustainable Flooring:

• Technology: Modular carpet tiles made from recycled materials.
• Sustainability Focus: Interface Inc. is a leading manufacturer of modular flooring that incorporates recycled materials and sustainable manufacturing processes. The company aims for a zero environmental footprint by 2040.
• Impact: By using renewable and recycled materials, Interface has reduced waste and carbon emissions, while also contributing to the circular economy.

4. Siemens – Smart Grid Technology:

• Technology: Smart grids and energy management systems.
• Sustainability Focus: Siemens developed smart grid technology to optimize energy consumption, reduce waste, and integrate renewable energy sources into power grids.
• Impact: Smart grids help reduce energy consumption, enhance grid reliability, and enable better integration of renewable energy sources like wind and solar.

5. Urban Farming – Vertical Gardens and Hydroponics:

• Technology: Hydroponics, vertical farming, and sustainable agriculture.
• Sustainability Focus: Urban farming initiatives in cities like New York, London, and Singapore are using hydroponic systems and vertical farming to grow food sustainably in urban environments with minimal land use and reduced transportation emissions.
• Impact: These technologies contribute to food security, reduce the carbon footprint of agriculture, and make food production more sustainable in urban environments.

Case Studies for “Sustainable Technology of 3490”:

If you were referring to a specific technology or product named “3490” in the context of sustainability, it might be useful to search for more specific sources or papers related to that product. If “3490” is an internal designation or part of a specific industry, it might be detailed in relevant industry reports or research publications.

Please let me know if you need more information or if there’s a specific area you want to explore further!

courtesy : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3490 ?

It seems like “Sustainable Technology of 3490” might be a specific term, technology, or model that you’re referring to, but it isn’t immediately recognizable in common sustainable technology or industry references. If you are referring to a specific technology, model number, or standard identified by “3490,” it would be helpful to have more context so that I can assist you more effectively.

In the case that you are looking for white papers on sustainable technologies, I can guide you through finding or understanding white papers on relevant topics. A white paper typically includes detailed research, analysis, and solutions around a specific topic, and for sustainable technology, they often cover topics such as:

1. Renewable Energy Technologies (Solar, Wind, Hydro)
2. Energy Efficiency in Industry and Buildings
3. Green Manufacturing and Circular Economy
4. Sustainable Transportation Solutions
5. Water Conservation Technologies
6. Waste Management and Recycling Innovations
7. Sustainable Agriculture Practices

How to find a white paper on “Sustainable Technology of 3490” (if it’s a specific topic):

1. Google Scholar: You can search for academic papers and white papers on sustainable technologies in specific fields, which may include a technology named “3490.” Google Scholar is a great resource for finding research papers and white papers on technology and sustainability.
2. Industry-Specific Databases: If “3490” is related to a particular sector (e.g., energy, manufacturing, IT), you can explore databases like:
   • IEEE Xplore for electrical engineering and technology papers.
   • ScienceDirect for peer-reviewed scientific journals.
   • SpringerLink for various academic and applied research papers.
3. Company or Industry Reports: Some companies or organizations publish white papers on new technologies or their sustainability practices. You could visit websites like Tesla, Siemens, or General Electric, as these companies often publish detailed reports on their sustainable technology advancements.
4. Government and NGO Reports: Institutions like the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Resources Institute (WRI), and various government bodies publish white papers and reports on sustainable technologies. For example, reports on energy, water conservation, and sustainable practices are often available.

What to include in a White Paper on Sustainable Technology:

If you’re creating a white paper on a sustainable technology (possibly “3490” if it’s a model or technology), here’s a general structure you could follow:

1. Introduction
   • Define the technology or model being discussed.
   • Briefly explain the importance of sustainability in the specific context.
2. Technology Overview
   • Provide a detailed description of the technology or product.
   • How does it function? What are its features?
3. Sustainability Aspects
   • Discuss how the technology contributes to sustainability (e.g., reducing emissions, conserving resources, energy efficiency).
   • Include environmental, economic, and social impacts.
4. Case Studies or Examples
   • Include real-world examples or case studies that show the technology in action.
   • Highlight benefits and outcomes from adopting the technology.
5. Challenges and Opportunities
   • Discuss any challenges in implementing the technology.
   • Explore future opportunities for improvement or scaling up the technology.
6. Conclusion
   • Summarize the key points and emphasize the role of the technology in achieving sustainable goals.

If you can clarify what you mean by “Sustainable Technology of 3490”, I can help you locate more precise resources or information!

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3490 ?

It seems that “Sustainable Technology of 3490” might still be unclear or specific to a certain context, standard, or product, but it doesn’t appear to be widely recognized. However, if we are discussing sustainable technologies in industrial applications in general, here’s how various sustainable technologies are typically used in different industries:

1. Renewable Energy in Manufacturing

• Technology: Solar panels, wind turbines, geothermal systems.
• Industrial Application: Many manufacturing plants are adopting renewable energy systems to power their operations, which helps reduce reliance on fossil fuels. For instance, Tesla’s Gigafactory uses solar power for its manufacturing processes.
• Sustainability Focus: Reduces carbon emissions, lowers energy costs, and enhances energy security.

2. Energy Efficiency in Industrial Equipment

• Technology: High-efficiency motors, LED lighting, variable frequency drives (VFDs).
• Industrial Application: Industrial facilities use energy-efficient motors and lighting systems to minimize energy consumption. VFDs are particularly used in pumps, fans, and compressors to adjust the speed of the motor based on demand, thereby saving energy.
• Sustainability Focus: Reduces energy consumption and operational costs, contributing to a decrease in overall carbon footprint.

3. Circular Economy and Waste Management

• Technology: Recycling technologies, waste-to-energy, closed-loop systems.
• Industrial Application: Industries such as automotive, electronics, and packaging are adopting circular economy principles, where products are designed for reuse, recycling, or remanufacturing. Some industries also convert waste materials into energy or usable raw materials.
• Sustainability Focus: Minimizes waste, reduces resource consumption, and promotes recycling and reusing materials.

4. Sustainable Agriculture Technologies

• Technology: Precision farming, vertical farming, and hydroponics.
• Industrial Application: Agriculture technologies are being used to optimize the use of water, reduce pesticide use, and increase crop yields. Precision farming uses GPS, sensors, and data analytics to minimize water and fertilizer use, while hydroponic and vertical farming reduce land use and water consumption.
• Sustainability Focus: Contributes to water conservation, reduces the environmental impact of farming, and supports local food production.

5. Green Building Technologies

• Technology: Energy-efficient HVAC systems, smart building management, sustainable building materials.
• Industrial Application: Many industries, particularly in construction and real estate, are adopting green building standards like LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) to design and construct energy-efficient, sustainable buildings. These buildings incorporate energy-efficient technologies, sustainable materials, and water-saving fixtures.
• Sustainability Focus: Reduces energy consumption, water use, and the environmental impact of buildings.

6. Water Conservation and Treatment Technologies

• Technology: Water recycling systems, desalination, and rainwater harvesting.
• Industrial Application: Industries such as food and beverage, textiles, and chemicals use advanced water treatment technologies to recycle and reuse water in their processes, reducing their dependency on freshwater resources. Desalination plants provide fresh water in regions where natural freshwater is scarce.
• Sustainability Focus: Reduces water usage, prevents contamination, and ensures the sustainable use of water resources.

7. Sustainable Transportation in Logistics

• Technology: Electric vehicles (EVs), hybrid trucks, and alternative fuels.
• Industrial Application: Logistics companies are transitioning to electric vehicles and hybrid trucks for delivering goods, reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Technologies such as biofuels and hydrogen fuel cells are also being explored to power larger vehicles like trucks and ships.
• Sustainability Focus: Reduces carbon emissions, lowers fuel costs, and contributes to cleaner transportation solutions.

8. Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS)

• Technology: Carbon capture systems, utilization technologies, and underground storage.
• Industrial Application: In industries like cement, steel, and power generation, CCUS technologies capture CO2 emissions produced during manufacturing processes and either store them underground or convert them into usable products like building materials or chemicals.
• Sustainability Focus: Reduces industrial carbon emissions, contributes to climate change mitigation, and supports industries in achieving net-zero emissions.

Conclusion:

If Sustainable Technology of 3490 refers to a specific product or standard, its industrial applications would depend on its nature. Generally, sustainable technologies are applied across industries to reduce environmental impacts, improve resource efficiency, and support long-term sustainability goals. If you can provide more details about what exactly “3490” refers to (whether it’s a product, technology standard, or model), I can give a more tailored response.

Feel free to clarify, and I can assist further!

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3490 ?

The term “Sustainable Technology of 3490” is not widely recognized in current literature or industry standards. However, there are several technologies and products with similar designations that focus on sustainability. Here are some examples:

Dell Precision 3490 Workstation
A mobile workstation designed with sustainable materials, including post-consumer recycled plastic and recycled carbon fiber. It has achieved EPEAT Gold certification and is ENERGY STAR qualified, reflecting Dell’s commitment to environmental standards.

dell.com

Emerson Rosemount 3490 Controller
A device used in level and flow measurement applications, designed to reduce complexity and enhance sustainability in water, wastewater, and process industries. It helps optimize processes and ensure regulatory compliance.

emerson.com

Taisox 3490 Material
A sustainable material developed by Formosa Plastics Corporation, evaluated for its durability, flexibility, thermal properties, and sustainability. It is used in various applications requiring high-performance materials.

ulprospector.com

If you can provide more context or specify the industry or application related to “3490,” I can offer more detailed information on its research and development in sustainable technology.

Sources

courtesy : Carnegie India

References

^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.

^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.

^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.

^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.

^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.

^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.

^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.

^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.

^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.

^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.

^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.

^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.

^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher

^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)

^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.

^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.

^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.

^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.

^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.

^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972

^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.

^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.

^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.

^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.

^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.

^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)

^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.

^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals

^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.

^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.

^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.

^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.

^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.

^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.

^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.

^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.

^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.

^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.

^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.

^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}

^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine

^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.

^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB

^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.

^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.

^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.

^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.

^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.

^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.

^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.

^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.

^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.

^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.

^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.

^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.

^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.

^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.

^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.

^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.

^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.

^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.