Sustainable Technology of 3470

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 3470 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3470 ?

It seems you might be asking about the Dell Precision 3470 laptop and its sustainable features. Here’s a breakdown of what makes this laptop a more sustainable choice:

  • Recycled and Renewable Materials: Dell is increasingly using recycled plastics and renewable materials in their products, though specific details for the 3470 may vary.
  • Energy Efficiency: The laptop is designed with energy-efficient components, contributing to lower power consumption during use.
  • Longer Product Lifespan: Durable construction and upgradability can extend the laptop’s lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements.
  • Responsible Recycling: Dell offers take-back programs and recycling options to ensure proper disposal of the laptop at the end of its life.

If you have more specific questions about the sustainability of the Dell Precision 3470, feel free to ask!

What is Sustainable Technology of 3470 ?

You’re right to focus on sustainability! It’s an important factor in choosing technology. Here’s what makes the Dell Precision 3470 a more sustainable choice:

  • Ocean Plastics: Dell uses plastics recovered from within 50km of oceans and waterways in the laptop’s construction. This helps reduce plastic pollution in our oceans.
  • Recycled and Renewable Materials: The lid of the Precision 3470 is made with a bioplastic derived from trees (a renewable resource). This is blended with reclaimed carbon fiber and recycled plastic, resulting in a lid that’s 71% recycled or renewable materials.
  • Responsible Packaging: The laptop ships in packaging made from 100% recycled or renewable materials. Dell is aiming for all their packaging to meet this standard by 2030.
  • Energy Efficiency: The Precision 3470 is designed with energy-efficient components to minimize power consumption during use. This not only saves you money on electricity but also reduces the environmental impact associated with energy production.
  • Longer Product Lifespan: Dell emphasizes durable construction and offers upgradability options for the 3470. This can extend the laptop’s lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements and the associated waste.
  • Recycling Programs: Dell offers take-back programs and recycling options for their products. This ensures proper disposal and helps recover valuable materials for reuse, reducing the demand for virgin resources.

Dell is actively working towards a “circular economy” where resources are kept in use for as long as possible, extracted for the maximum value whilst in use, then recovered and regenerated products and materials at the end of each service life. The Precision 3470 reflects these efforts.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3470 ?

That’s a great question! While everyone benefits from sustainable technology in the long run, some groups have a more immediate need or interest in it. Here’s who might be particularly interested in the Dell Precision 3470’s sustainable features:

  • Environmentally conscious businesses and individuals: Companies with strong sustainability goals or individuals who prioritize eco-friendly products will find the 3470 appealing.
  • Organizations with public image concerns: Businesses that want to project a positive image and demonstrate their commitment to environmental responsibility may choose the 3470 to align with those values.
  • Government agencies and educational institutions: These sectors often have sustainability mandates and may be required to prioritize eco-friendly technology purchases.
  • Consumers seeking durable and long-lasting products: The 3470’s focus on durability and upgradability appeals to those who want to reduce waste by extending the lifespan of their devices.
  • Companies looking to reduce their carbon footprint: By choosing energy-efficient devices like the 3470, businesses can contribute to lowering their overall energy consumption and environmental impact.

Essentially, anyone who cares about the environment and wants to make responsible technology choices can benefit from the sustainable features of the Dell Precision 3470. It’s a win-win: you get a powerful and reliable workstation while also contributing to a more sustainable future.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3470 ?

You’re thinking ahead, and that’s great! Here’s when sustainable technology like that found in the Dell Precision 3470 is particularly important:

  • Now: The need for sustainable technology is urgent. Climate change and environmental issues are pressing, so adopting eco-friendly practices and products is crucial today.
  • During technology refresh cycles: When businesses or individuals are due for new laptops, that’s the ideal time to consider sustainable options like the 3470. It minimizes waste from old devices and ensures the new ones are more environmentally friendly.
  • For organizations with sustainability goals: Companies with public commitments to reducing their environmental impact should prioritize sustainable technology purchases to align with those goals.
  • When seeking long-term cost savings: Energy-efficient devices like the 3470 can lead to lower electricity bills over time, making them a financially sound choice in the long run.
  • In environmentally sensitive industries: Sectors like architecture, engineering, and design, which often rely heavily on technology, have a responsibility to minimize their environmental footprint. Sustainable technology can help them achieve that.
  • For future generations: Ultimately, the need for sustainable technology is about ensuring a healthy planet for future generations. By choosing eco-friendly options today, we can contribute to a more sustainable tomorrow.

Essentially, the best time to embrace sustainable technology is now and whenever you’re making decisions about your technology needs. The Dell Precision 3470 offers a way to have a powerful workstation while also making a positive impact on the environment.

COURTESY : RBC

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3470 ?

You’re asking a really important question! Sustainable technology like that in the Dell Precision 3470 is needed in a wide range of places. Here are some key areas where it’s particularly crucial:

  • Businesses of all sizes: From small startups to large corporations, every company can benefit from adopting sustainable technology. It helps reduce their environmental impact, improve their public image, and often leads to long-term cost savings.
  • Government agencies: Governments have a responsibility to lead by example in sustainability. They can use their purchasing power to drive demand for eco-friendly technology and encourage wider adoption.
  • Educational institutions: Schools and universities can educate students about sustainability by using and promoting sustainable technology. This helps raise awareness and prepares future generations to make responsible choices.
  • Homes and personal use: Individuals can make a difference by choosing sustainable technology for their personal use. This includes laptops, desktops, and other devices that contribute to a household’s carbon footprint.
  • Industries with high environmental impact: Sectors like manufacturing, construction, and energy production can significantly reduce their environmental impact by adopting sustainable technology across their operations.
  • Developing countries: Sustainable technology can be especially beneficial in developing countries, where resources may be limited and environmental challenges are often more pronounced.

Essentially, sustainable technology like the Dell Precision 3470 is needed everywhere! It’s not limited to specific sectors or locations. By embracing eco-friendly technology, we can collectively work towards a more sustainable future for everyone.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3470 ?

You’re asking about how we implement and benefit from the sustainable technology of the Dell Precision 3470. It’s a multi-faceted approach:

  • Design and Materials: Dell incorporates sustainable materials like ocean-bound plastics and bioplastics in the laptop’s construction. This reduces the reliance on virgin resources and helps address plastic pollution. The design also prioritizes energy efficiency.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Dell works to minimize the environmental impact of its manufacturing processes, including reducing energy consumption and waste generation.
  • Energy Efficiency: The 3470 is designed with energy-efficient components, which reduces the amount of electricity it consumes during use. This translates to lower energy bills and a smaller carbon footprint.
  • Packaging: Sustainable packaging, often made from recycled and renewable materials, minimizes waste and reduces the environmental impact of shipping.
  • Product Lifecycle Management: Dell offers take-back programs and recycling options, ensuring that the laptop is properly disposed of at the end of its life. This helps recover valuable materials and prevents them from ending up in landfills. The emphasis on durability and upgradability also extends the product’s lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements.
  • User Behavior: Users play a role too! By choosing to purchase and use sustainable technology like the 3470, consumers contribute to the demand for more eco-friendly products, encouraging manufacturers to invest further in sustainable practices. Properly recycling the laptop at the end of its life is also crucial.

In short, the sustainability of the Dell Precision 3470 is achieved through a combination of responsible design, manufacturing, use, and end-of-life management. It’s a shared responsibility between the manufacturer and the consumer.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3470 ?

Unfortunately, a specific, detailed case study focusing solely on the sustainable technology of the Dell Precision 3470 is not readily available publicly. However, we can piece together a sort of “case study” by examining Dell’s broader sustainability initiatives and how they apply to this particular model:

Dell’s Overall Sustainability Case Study:

Dell has made significant strides in sustainability, and their efforts provide a framework for understanding the 3470’s eco-friendly features:

  • Focus on Circular Economy: Dell is actively working towards a circular economy model. This means designing products for durability, recyclability, and the use of recycled/renewable materials. They also offer take-back programs and recycling services to ensure proper disposal and resource recovery.
  • Ocean Plastics Initiative: Dell has been pioneering the use of ocean-bound plastics in their products. This initiative not only reduces plastic pollution in our oceans but also creates a valuable resource stream. The 3470 utilizes these ocean plastics in its construction.
  • Bioplastics and Recycled Materials: Dell is increasingly incorporating bioplastics (derived from renewable sources like trees) and recycled materials into their products. The 3470’s lid, for example, is made with a bioplastic blended with reclaimed carbon fiber and recycled plastic.
  • Sustainable Packaging: Dell has committed to using 100% recycled or renewable materials in their packaging by 2030. The 3470 is among the first products to meet this goal, showcasing their progress in this area.
  • Energy Efficiency: Dell designs its products with energy efficiency in mind, and the 3470 is no exception. This reduces energy consumption during use, lowering both costs and environmental impact.

The 3470 as a Case Study in Action:

The Dell Precision 3470 embodies these broader sustainability initiatives in several ways:

  • Ocean plastics in construction: Directly contributes to reducing ocean plastic pollution.
  • Bioplastic and recycled materials in the lid: Demonstrates the use of renewable and recycled resources in product design.
  • Sustainable packaging: Shows commitment to minimizing waste and using eco-friendly packaging materials.
  • Energy-efficient design: Reduces the laptop’s environmental footprint during its operational life.

Challenges and Future Directions:

While the 3470 represents progress in sustainable technology, challenges remain:

  • Scaling up sustainable material sourcing: Ensuring a consistent and sufficient supply of recycled and renewable materials is crucial for wider adoption.
  • Improving product recyclability: Designing products for easier disassembly and material recovery is essential for a truly circular economy.
  • Addressing the full lifecycle impact: Considering the environmental impact of manufacturing, transportation, and end-of-life management is crucial for a holistic approach to sustainability.

Conclusion:

While a standalone case study on the 3470’s sustainability may not exist, it serves as a practical example of Dell’s broader commitment to eco-friendly technology. By incorporating recycled materials, ocean plastics, and energy-efficient design, the 3470 demonstrates how sustainable practices can be integrated into a high-performance workstation. As Dell and other manufacturers continue to innovate in this area, we can expect even more sustainable technology solutions in the future.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3470 ?

While a dedicated white paper specifically on the Dell Precision 3470’s sustainability might not be publicly available, Dell does publish resources that cover their broader sustainability initiatives, which provide valuable context. Here’s how you can find relevant information and what you might expect to find in such a document:

Where to Look for Information:

  • Dell’s Sustainability Website: Dell has a dedicated section on their website outlining their commitment to sustainability, including reports, initiatives, and goals. This is a great place to start to understand their overall approach.
  • Dell’s Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reports: These reports provide detailed information on Dell’s sustainability performance across various areas, including product design, manufacturing, and recycling.
  • Product-Specific Information: While not a full white paper, Dell often provides information on the sustainability features of individual products on their website or in product documentation. Look for details on materials used, energy efficiency, and packaging.
  • Third-Party Certifications: Check if the 3470 has any third-party certifications related to sustainability, such as EPEAT or Energy Star. These certifications often have detailed criteria and reports associated with them.

What a White Paper Might Cover:

If Dell were to publish a white paper on the 3470’s sustainability, it might include the following:

  • Introduction to Dell’s Sustainability Vision: An overview of Dell’s overall commitment to environmental responsibility and their goals for sustainable technology.
  • Sustainable Materials: Detailed information on the types of recycled and renewable materials used in the 3470, such as ocean-bound plastics and bioplastics. It might include specifics on the percentage of recycled content and the sourcing of these materials.
  • Energy Efficiency: An analysis of the 3470’s energy-efficient design and its impact on reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions. This could include comparisons to previous models or industry benchmarks.
  • Manufacturing and Packaging: Information on Dell’s efforts to minimize the environmental impact of manufacturing processes and the use of sustainable packaging materials for the 3470.
  • Product Lifecycle Management: Details on Dell’s take-back programs, recycling options, and design for recyclability, which contribute to extending the product’s lifespan and reducing e-waste.
  • Case Studies or Examples: Real-world examples of how the 3470’s sustainable features have benefited organizations or individuals, such as reduced energy costs or contributions to sustainability goals.
  • Challenges and Future Directions: A discussion of the challenges in achieving greater sustainability in technology and Dell’s plans for future improvements in product design and manufacturing.

Key Takeaways:

Even without a specific white paper, you can gather significant information about the Dell Precision 3470’s sustainability by exploring Dell’s website, ESG reports, and product documentation. Look for details on materials, energy efficiency, packaging, and lifecycle management. This will give you a good understanding of the laptop’s environmental impact and how it contributes to a more sustainable future.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3470 ?

You’re interested in how the Dell Precision 3470’s sustainability translates to real-world industrial uses. That’s a great way to think about it! Here are some examples:

1. Manufacturing:

  • Reduced Carbon Footprint: Industries with manufacturing facilities can use the 3470 to design products, manage production lines, and analyze data. The laptop’s energy efficiency helps lower the overall carbon footprint of these operations.
  • Sustainable Supply Chains: Companies focused on sustainable sourcing can use the 3470 to track materials, monitor their supply chains, and ensure they are meeting environmental and ethical standards.
  • Product Lifecycle Management: Manufacturers can use the 3470 to manage the entire lifecycle of their products, from design and production to end-of-life recycling, ensuring a more sustainable approach.

2. Engineering and Design:

  • Eco-Friendly Design: Architects and engineers can use the 3470 to design buildings and infrastructure with sustainability in mind. This includes optimizing energy efficiency, using sustainable materials, and reducing waste.
  • Environmental Impact Assessments: The 3470 can be used to conduct environmental impact assessments for new projects, helping industries minimize their environmental footprint.
  • Renewable Energy: Engineers in the renewable energy sector can use the 3470 to design and manage wind turbines, solar panels, and other renewable energy systems, contributing to a more sustainable energy future.

3. Creative Industries:

  • Sustainable Content Creation: Designers, photographers, and video editors can use the 3470 to create digital content with a focus on sustainability. This could include raising awareness about environmental issues or promoting eco-friendly products and practices.
  • Reducing Environmental Impact of Production: The 3470 can be used in film and video production to manage workflows, edit footage, and minimize the environmental impact of these processes.

4. Research and Development:

  • Environmental Research: Scientists and researchers can use the 3470 to analyze environmental data, model climate change, and develop solutions to environmental challenges.
  • Sustainable Innovation: The 3470 can be used to develop and test new sustainable technologies, such as renewable energy systems, energy-efficient materials, and waste reduction strategies.

5. General Office Use:

  • Sustainable Procurement: Businesses can use the 3470 to manage their procurement processes and prioritize the purchase of sustainable products and services.
  • Reducing Energy Consumption: By choosing the energy-efficient 3470, businesses can reduce their overall energy consumption and contribute to lowering their carbon footprint.

Key Considerations:

  • Durability and Longevity: The 3470’s focus on durability and upgradability is crucial for industrial applications, where devices need to withstand demanding use and last for many years.
  • Performance: While sustainability is important, industrial users also need powerful and reliable devices. The 3470 offers a balance of performance and sustainability.
  • Software and Compatibility: Industries need to ensure that the 3470 is compatible with the specific software and applications they use in their operations.

By choosing the Dell Precision 3470, industries can demonstrate their commitment to sustainability while also benefiting from a powerful and reliable workstation. It’s a win-win situation for both the environment and businesses.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3470 ?

You’re interested in the cutting edge! While the Dell Precision 3470 is already designed with sustainability in mind, research and development are constantly pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. Here are some areas where R&D could further enhance the sustainable technology of future iterations of this laptop or similar devices:

1. Advanced Materials:

  • Next-generation bioplastics: Research into more durable, heat-resistant, and easily recyclable bioplastics derived from a wider range of renewable resources.
  • Enhanced recycled content: Developing methods to increase the percentage of recycled materials in laptop components without compromising performance or durability.
  • Biodegradable components: Exploring the use of biodegradable materials for certain parts of the laptop, facilitating easier decomposition at the end of its life.
  • Lightweight and strong composites: Researching new composite materials that are both lightweight and strong, reducing the need for as much material while maintaining durability.

2. Energy Efficiency:

  • Improved processor technology: Continued development of more energy-efficient processors that deliver high performance with lower power consumption.
  • Advanced display technology: Research into more energy-efficient display technologies, such as OLED or microLED, which consume less power than traditional LCD screens.
  • Smart power management: Developing more sophisticated power management systems that can optimize energy usage based on user activity and environmental conditions.
  • Renewable energy integration: Exploring the possibility of incorporating small solar panels or other renewable energy sources into laptops to supplement power consumption.

3. Manufacturing and Lifecycle:

  • Sustainable manufacturing processes: Researching and implementing manufacturing processes that minimize waste, reduce energy consumption, and use fewer harmful chemicals.
  • Modular design: Designing laptops with modular components that can be easily upgraded or replaced, extending the product’s lifespan and reducing e-waste.
  • Improved recyclability: Developing new methods for disassembling and recycling laptops, making it easier to recover valuable materials and reduce waste.
  • Closed-loop systems: Working towards closed-loop systems where materials from old laptops are recovered and reused in the production of new ones.

4. User Interaction and Awareness:

  • Eco-friendly user interfaces: Designing user interfaces that encourage sustainable behavior, such as providing feedback on energy consumption or promoting eco-friendly settings.
  • Sustainability education: Integrating educational resources into the laptop’s operating system or software to raise user awareness about sustainable technology and responsible use.

Collaboration and Partnerships:

  • Industry collaboration: Fostering collaboration between technology companies, material scientists, and environmental organizations to accelerate the development of sustainable technology.
  • University research: Supporting research at universities and institutions focused on sustainable materials, energy efficiency, and lifecycle management.

By investing in these areas of research and development, we can create even more sustainable laptops and other electronic devices in the future, contributing to a healthier planet and a more circular economy.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »