Sustainable Technology of 3430

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 3430 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3430 ?

Sustainable technology, also known as green technology, refers to the use of technology to minimize negative impacts on the environment. It encompasses a wide range of practices and innovations aimed at conserving resources, reducing pollution, and creating a more sustainable future.

Key areas of sustainable technology:

  • Renewable energy: Developing and utilizing sources like solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal to replace fossil fuels.
  • Energy efficiency: Designing and implementing technologies that reduce energy consumption in buildings, transportation, and industries.
  • Waste management: Finding innovative ways to reduce waste, recycle materials, and create a circular economy.
  • Water conservation: Developing technologies to conserve water in agriculture, industry, and households.
  • Sustainable agriculture: Implementing farming practices that minimize environmental impact and promote biodiversity.

Benefits of sustainable technology:

  • Reduced environmental impact: Sustainable technologies help minimize pollution, conserve resources, and mitigate climate change.
  • Economic benefits: Sustainable practices can lead to cost savings through reduced energy consumption and waste.
  • Improved public health: Reducing pollution and promoting cleaner environments can improve public health outcomes.
  • Social equity: Sustainable technologies can help address social inequalities by providing access to clean energy and resources.

Examples of sustainable technology in action:

  • Electric vehicles: Replacing gasoline-powered cars with electric vehicles reduces emissions and promotes cleaner air.
  • Solar-powered homes: Installing solar panels on homes allows residents to generate their own clean energy.
  • Smart grids: Using technology to optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.
  • Vertical farms: Growing crops in stacked layers indoors reduces land use and water consumption.
  • Water filtration systems: Providing access to clean drinking water in communities with limited resources.

Challenges and opportunities:

While sustainable technology offers many benefits, there are also challenges to overcome. These include:

  • Cost: Implementing sustainable technologies can be expensive, requiring significant upfront investment.
  • Infrastructure: Building the necessary infrastructure to support sustainable technologies can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Policy and regulation: Supportive policies and regulations are needed to incentivize the adoption of sustainable technologies.
  • Public awareness: Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainable technology is crucial for widespread adoption.

Despite these challenges, the future of sustainable technology is bright. As technology continues to advance and costs decrease, sustainable solutions will become more accessible and widespread. By embracing sustainable technology, we can create a more environmentally friendly, economically prosperous, and socially equitable world for future generations.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3430 ?

Unfortunately, “Sustainable Technology of 3430” is a bit of an ambiguous term without more context. It could refer to a few different things:

1. A Specific Course or Program:

  • It’s possible that “3430” is a course code or program identifier at a specific university or institution. For example, there might be a course called “Sustainable Technology 3430” that explores sustainable practices and technologies.
  • To find out more, you would need to search for this specific course or program online or check the course catalog of a relevant institution.

2. A Future Technology:

  • It’s also possible that “3430” is meant to represent a future year. In this case, “Sustainable Technology of 3430” would refer to the sustainable technologies that might exist 1400 years from now.
  • While it’s fun to speculate about the future, it’s impossible to know for sure what technologies will exist that far in the future. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and developments.

Possible Future Sustainable Technologies (Year 3430):

  • Advanced Energy Systems:
    • Fusion power may be a reality, providing clean and abundant energy.
    • Solar energy may be harvested from space and beamed down to Earth.
    • Energy storage technologies may be incredibly efficient, allowing for easy storage and distribution of renewable energy.
  • Circular Economy:
    • Products may be designed for disassembly and reuse, minimizing waste.
    • Advanced recycling technologies may be able to recover valuable materials from any type of waste.
    • Manufacturing processes may be entirely closed-loop, with no waste generated.
  • Environmental Restoration:
    • Technologies may exist to actively restore damaged ecosystems, such as coral reefs and rainforests.
    • Climate engineering technologies may be able to safely remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
    • Pollution may be a thing of the past, with advanced technologies preventing pollution at its source.
  • Sustainable Transportation:
    • Flying cars or other advanced air transportation systems may be common.
    • Ground transportation may be entirely electric and highly efficient.
    • Transportation systems may be optimized to minimize congestion and energy use.
  • Sustainable Agriculture:
    • Vertical farms and other advanced agricultural technologies may be able to produce food efficiently in any environment.
    • Precision agriculture may be used to optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.
    • Genetically modified crops may be developed to be more resilient and require fewer resources.

Important Note:

  • It’s important to remember that these are just speculations. The actual sustainable technologies of 3430 may be very different from what we can imagine today.
  • However, by continuing to invest in research and development of sustainable technologies, we can increase the chances of creating a more sustainable future for ourselves and generations to come.

If you can provide more context about where you encountered the term “Sustainable Technology of 3430”, I may be able to give you a more specific answer.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3430 ?

It seems you’re interested in who would need or benefit from sustainable technology in the year 3430! That’s a fascinating question. While we can’t predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the long-term challenges facing humanity.

In short, everyone would need and benefit from sustainable technology in 3430. Here’s why:

  • Resource Scarcity: Even with technological advancements, it’s likely that natural resources will become increasingly scarce over time. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for managing these resources efficiently and ensuring their availability for future generations.
  • Climate Change: The effects of climate change are expected to worsen in the coming centuries. Sustainable technologies will be essential for mitigating these effects, adapting to changing conditions, and potentially even reversing some of the damage.
  • Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and other forms of environmental degradation will likely continue to be major challenges. Sustainable technologies will be needed to minimize these impacts and restore ecosystems.
  • Population Growth: The global population is projected to continue growing, putting further strain on resources and the environment. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for meeting the needs of this growing population in a responsible way.

Here are some specific groups who would particularly rely on sustainable technology in 3430:

  • Governments and policymakers: They will need sustainable technologies to develop and implement effective policies for resource management, environmental protection, and economic development.
  • Businesses: They will need sustainable technologies to operate in an environmentally responsible way, reduce costs, and meet the growing demand for sustainable products and services.
  • Communities: They will need sustainable technologies to access clean energy, water, and other essential resources, and to adapt to the impacts of climate change.
  • Individuals: They will need sustainable technologies to live healthy and fulfilling lives, reduce their environmental footprint, and contribute to a sustainable future.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3430 will be a necessity for human survival and well-being. It will be woven into every aspect of life, from the way we generate energy and produce food to the way we design our cities and transport ourselves.

It’s important to remember that the development of sustainable technology is an ongoing process. The choices we make today will have a profound impact on the world of 3430. By investing in research and development, promoting sustainable practices, and educating future generations, we can help ensure that the people of 3430 have the tools they need to thrive in a sustainable world.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3430 ?

That’s a great question! It helps to clarify what we mean by “required” in this context.

Technically, sustainable technology of 3430 is not required at any specific moment. There’s no cosmic deadline for humanity to achieve complete sustainability.

However, from a practical and ethical standpoint, the need for sustainable technology in 3430 (and long before) is urgent and ever-present. Here’s a breakdown of why:

  • The sooner, the better: The longer we wait to develop and implement sustainable technologies, the more severe the consequences of environmental degradation, climate change, and resource depletion will become. The people of 3430 will inherit the cumulative effects of our actions (or inaction) today.
  • A continuous process: Sustainable technology isn’t a destination but a journey. It requires ongoing research, innovation, and adaptation to new challenges and circumstances. The need for sustainable solutions will only grow as populations increase, resources become scarcer, and environmental problems intensify.
  • Intergenerational responsibility: We have a moral obligation to future generations to leave them a habitable planet. This means taking action now to develop and implement sustainable technologies that will ensure their well-being.

Therefore, the “when” for sustainable technology of 3430 is NOW. Every year that passes without significant progress towards sustainability makes the challenges facing future generations even greater.

Here’s a way to think about it:

Imagine you’re planning a long journey. You know you’ll need reliable transportation, food, and water along the way. You wouldn’t wait until the last minute to prepare, right? You’d start planning and gathering resources well in advance to ensure a safe and successful trip.

Similarly, ensuring a sustainable future for the people of 3430 requires action today. We need to invest in research, develop new technologies, and implement sustainable practices now to avoid a future crisis.

In conclusion, the need for sustainable technology in 3430 is not a question of a specific date but a continuous and urgent imperative that demands our attention and action today.

COURTESY : Carnegie India

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3430 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 3430 (and, of course, long before) isn’t confined to a single location. It’s a global imperative. However, thinking about “where” it’s required can be broken down in a few ways:

  1. Everywhere on Earth: The challenges that sustainable technology addresses—climate change, resource depletion, pollution—are global in nature. Therefore, the need for sustainable solutions exists in every country, region, and community across the planet. Whether it’s a bustling metropolis or a remote village, sustainable practices will be essential for thriving in 3430.
  2. In all sectors of society: Sustainable technology isn’t just needed in one specific area. It’s required across all sectors, including:
    • Energy: Sustainable energy production and distribution will be crucial everywhere.
    • Agriculture: Sustainable farming practices will be needed to feed the global population.
    • Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems will be essential for moving people and goods.
    • Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing processes will be needed to produce goods without depleting resources or harming the environment.
    • Construction: Sustainable building practices will be essential for creating livable and resource-efficient spaces.
    • Waste management: Sustainable waste management systems will be needed to minimize waste and recycle resources.
  3. In the interactions between human systems and the natural world: Sustainable technology is needed at the intersection of human activity and the environment. This means finding ways to:
    • Minimize our impact on ecosystems.
    • Conserve biodiversity.
    • Protect natural resources.
    • Restore damaged environments.
  4. In the minds and actions of individuals: Ultimately, the success of sustainable technology depends on its adoption by individuals. Sustainable practices need to be integrated into our daily lives, from the choices we make as consumers to the way we interact with our communities.

So, to answer your question directly: Sustainable technology in 3430 (and today) is required everywhere—across the globe, in all sectors of society, in the interactions between humans and nature, and in the choices of individuals. It’s a universal need for a thriving future.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3430 ?

The “how” of sustainable technology in 3430 is a complex question, as it involves both the methods of developing and implementing these technologies and the reasons why they will be necessary. Let’s break it down:

1. How will sustainable technology be developed and implemented?

  • Continuous Research and Development: A massive and ongoing investment in scientific research and technological innovation will be crucial. This includes exploring new energy sources, developing advanced materials, improving energy efficiency, and creating closed-loop systems for resource use.
  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Sustainable technology requires collaboration across multiple disciplines, including science, engineering, design, social sciences, and policy. Experts from different fields will need to work together to develop holistic solutions.
  • Global Cooperation: The challenges of sustainability are global, requiring international cooperation in research, development, and implementation. Sharing knowledge, resources, and best practices will be essential.
  • Education and Training: Developing a workforce with the skills and knowledge to create, implement, and maintain sustainable technologies will be crucial. This requires investing in education and training programs at all levels.
  • Policy and Regulation: Supportive policies and regulations will be needed to incentivize the development and adoption of sustainable technologies. This includes setting standards, providing incentives, and creating a level playing field for sustainable businesses.
  • Public Awareness and Engagement: Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainable technology and engaging citizens in the process will be essential. This includes educating people about the benefits of sustainable practices and empowering them to make sustainable choices.
  • Adaptive Management: Sustainable technology development and implementation will need to be an iterative process, with continuous monitoring, evaluation, and adaptation to new challenges and circumstances.

2. Why will sustainable technology be necessary in 3430?

  • Resource Constraints: Even with technological advancements, many natural resources are finite. Sustainable technologies will be essential for managing these resources efficiently and ensuring their availability for future generations.
  • Climate Change Impacts: The effects of climate change are expected to worsen in the coming centuries. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for mitigating these effects, adapting to changing conditions, and potentially even reversing some of the damage.
  • Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and other forms of environmental degradation will likely continue to be major challenges. Sustainable technologies will be needed to minimize these impacts and restore ecosystems.
  • Population Growth: The global population is projected to continue growing, putting further strain on resources and the environment. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for meeting the needs of this growing population in a responsible way.
  • Maintaining Quality of Life: Sustainable technology will be essential for maintaining and improving the quality of life for future generations. This includes access to clean energy, water, food, and other essential resources, as well as a healthy and sustainable environment.

In essence, the “how” of sustainable technology in 3430 involves a combination of scientific innovation, collaboration, education, policy, and public engagement. The “why” stems from the fundamental need to address the interconnected challenges of resource scarcity, climate change, environmental degradation, and population growth to ensure a thriving future for humanity.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3430 ?

It’s tricky to provide a specific case study for sustainable technology in 3430, as that’s far into the future! However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential future developments.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 3430

Background:

By the early 21st century, deforestation and climate change had severely impacted the Amazon rainforest, leading to significant biodiversity loss, soil erosion, and altered weather patterns. Recognizing the crucial role of the Amazon in global climate regulation and biodiversity, international efforts were launched to restore the rainforest.

The Challenge:

Restoring the Amazon rainforest presented numerous challenges:

  • Scale: The vast size of the rainforest required large-scale solutions.
  • Complexity: The interconnectedness of the ecosystem demanded a holistic approach.
  • Sustainability: The restoration efforts needed to be sustainable in the long term.

The Solution:

In 3430, the revitalization of the Amazon rainforest was achieved through a combination of advanced sustainable technologies:

  • AI-powered Reforestation: Drones equipped with AI and precision planting technology were used to reforest vast areas with native tree species. The AI algorithms analyzed soil conditions, climate data, and biodiversity patterns to optimize planting strategies.
  • Climate Engineering: Advanced climate engineering technologies were deployed to mitigate the impacts of climate change on the Amazon. These technologies included carbon capture and storage, solar radiation management, and cloud seeding to regulate rainfall patterns.
  • Bioremediation: Genetically engineered microorganisms were used to remediate degraded soils and remove pollutants. These microorganisms were designed to break down harmful substances and restore soil fertility.
  • Biodiversity Conservation: Advanced sensor networks and AI-powered monitoring systems were used to track biodiversity and detect threats to endangered species. This information was used to implement targeted conservation measures.
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Sustainable agricultural practices were promoted in the Amazon region to reduce deforestation and promote economic development. These practices included agroforestry, crop rotation, and precision agriculture.

Results:

By 3430, the Amazon rainforest had been largely restored. Biodiversity had rebounded, soil erosion was minimized, and the rainforest’s role in global climate regulation was re-established. The revitalization of the Amazon served as a model for ecosystem restoration efforts around the world.

Lessons Learned:

This hypothetical case study highlights the potential of sustainable technology to address complex environmental challenges. It demonstrates the importance of:

  • Long-term vision: Addressing sustainability requires a long-term perspective and commitment.
  • Technological innovation: Continuous research and development are crucial for creating sustainable solutions.
  • Interdisciplinary collaboration: Solving complex problems requires collaboration across multiple disciplines.
  • Global cooperation: Addressing global challenges requires international cooperation.

While this is a fictional scenario, it illustrates the kind of transformative impact sustainable technology could have in the future. By investing in sustainable solutions today, we can increase the chances of creating a world where such positive outcomes are possible.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3430 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology of 3430 – A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3430. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and scientific advancements to envision the types of technologies that might be crucial for ensuring a thriving and sustainable future for humanity. This paper examines potential advancements in key areas like energy, resource management, environmental restoration, and societal adaptation, highlighting the interconnectedness of these technologies and their importance for addressing the long-term challenges facing our planet.

1. Introduction:

The year 3430 represents a significant temporal distance, making detailed predictions challenging. However, the fundamental principles of sustainability – meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs – will remain paramount. This paper explores potential technological solutions that could enable humanity to achieve this goal in the face of resource constraints, climate change, and a growing global population.  

2. Advanced Energy Systems:

  • Fusion Power: By 3430, fusion power may have become a commercially viable and widespread energy source, providing clean, abundant, and safe energy.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Harvesting solar energy in space and beaming it to Earth could provide a continuous and reliable source of renewable energy, overcoming the limitations of terrestrial solar power.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and scalable energy storage technologies will be essential for balancing supply and demand from intermittent renewable sources and enabling decentralized energy systems.

3. Circular Economy and Resource Management:

  • Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Products will be designed for disassembly and reuse, minimizing waste and maximizing resource recovery. Advanced recycling technologies will be able to extract valuable materials from any type of waste.
  • Material Science Breakthroughs: New materials with unique properties, such as self-healing materials and biodegradable plastics, will be developed to reduce resource consumption and environmental impact.
  • Personalized Resource Management: AI-powered systems will help individuals and communities optimize resource consumption, minimizing waste and promoting sustainable lifestyles.

4. Environmental Restoration and Climate Adaptation:

  • Advanced Climate Engineering: Technologies for carbon capture and storage, solar radiation management, and other climate engineering techniques may be deployed to mitigate the impacts of climate change.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Advanced techniques for restoring damaged ecosystems, such as coral reefs and rainforests, will be developed and implemented on a large scale.
  • Precision Agriculture and Food Production: Vertical farms, precision agriculture, and other innovative food production systems will be used to increase food production while minimizing environmental impact.

5. Societal Adaptation and Governance:

  • Smart Cities and Infrastructure: Urban centers will be designed and managed using smart technologies to optimize resource use, reduce pollution, and enhance quality of life.
  • Global Information Networks: Advanced communication and information networks will facilitate global cooperation on sustainability challenges and enable real-time monitoring of environmental conditions.
  • Sustainable Governance Systems: New governance models may emerge that prioritize sustainability and long-term planning, ensuring that the needs of future generations are taken into account.

6. Challenges and Opportunities:

The realization of these advanced sustainable technologies will require significant investments in research and development, as well as international cooperation and policy support. Ethical considerations surrounding the use of these technologies, particularly climate engineering, will need to be carefully addressed.

7. Conclusion:

While the specific technologies described in this paper are speculative, they represent potential pathways towards a sustainable future. By investing in research, fostering innovation, and promoting global cooperation, we can increase the likelihood of achieving a world in 3430 where humanity thrives in harmony with the planet. The journey towards this future begins today, with the choices we make and the actions we take to create a more sustainable world for generations to come.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3430 ?

It’s fascinating to speculate about the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3430! While we can’t know for certain, we can extrapolate from current trends and imagine how industries might operate in a truly sustainable future. Here are some potential industrial applications:

1. Manufacturing:

  • Closed-Loop Production Systems: Factories will operate on closed-loop principles, where all waste is either recycled or used as a resource for other processes. “Zero-waste” manufacturing will be the norm.
  • On-Demand Manufacturing with Advanced Materials: 3D printing and other additive manufacturing technologies will be highly advanced, allowing for on-demand production of goods using sustainable and customizable materials. These materials might be self-healing, biodegradable, or sourced from recycled materials.
  • AI-Optimized Resource Use: AI systems will manage every aspect of the manufacturing process, optimizing energy consumption, minimizing waste, and predicting maintenance needs to ensure maximum efficiency and minimize downtime.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

  • Fusion-Powered Industries: Industries requiring high energy inputs, such as metal production or chemical processing, will likely be powered by clean and abundant fusion energy.
  • Decentralized Energy Grids: Industries may generate their own energy using a combination of renewable sources like space-based solar power, geothermal energy, or advanced biofuel systems, integrated into smart and highly efficient microgrids.
  • Energy Storage Integration: Large-scale energy storage facilities will be integrated with industrial processes, allowing industries to store excess renewable energy and use it during periods of peak demand or low renewable energy availability.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

  • Sustainable Mining: Advanced robotics and AI will be used to minimize the environmental impact of mining operations. Focus will be on extracting resources from existing waste streams and recycled materials rather than relying solely on virgin resources.
  • Advanced Material Recovery: Highly efficient recycling technologies will be able to recover valuable materials from complex products and waste streams, creating a circular economy for materials.
  • Biorefineries: Industries will utilize biorefineries to convert biomass into fuels, chemicals, and other valuable products, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and creating a more sustainable bio-based economy.

4. Transportation and Logistics:

  • Hyper-Efficient Transportation Systems: Goods will be transported using a combination of advanced technologies, such as maglev trains, autonomous vehicles, and potentially even air-based transportation systems, all optimized for energy efficiency and minimal environmental impact.
  • Localized Supply Chains: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing technologies will enable more localized production, reducing the need for long-distance transportation and minimizing carbon emissions.
  • Smart Logistics Networks: AI-powered logistics systems will optimize transportation routes, minimize fuel consumption, and ensure the efficient delivery of goods.

5. Agriculture and Food Production:

  • Vertical Farms and Controlled-Environment Agriculture: Vertical farms and other controlled-environment agriculture systems will be used to produce food locally and efficiently, minimizing land use, water consumption, and the need for pesticides and fertilizers.
  • Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors, drones, and AI will be used to optimize agricultural practices, minimizing resource inputs and maximizing yields while minimizing environmental impact.
  • Sustainable Food Processing: Food processing facilities will be designed to minimize waste, recycle water, and utilize renewable energy sources.

6. Construction and Infrastructure:

  • Self-Healing and Sustainable Building Materials: Buildings will be constructed using self-healing and sustainable materials, reducing the need for maintenance and repair and minimizing environmental impact.
  • Modular and Prefabricated Construction: Modular and prefabricated construction techniques will be used to reduce construction waste and improve efficiency.
  • Smart Infrastructure Systems: Buildings and infrastructure will be equipped with sensors and AI systems to optimize energy use, manage water resources, and monitor structural integrity.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could transform industries in 3430. The key takeaway is that sustainability will be fully integrated into every aspect of industrial activity, creating a circular economy where resources are used efficiently, waste is minimized, and environmental impact is minimized.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3430 ?

Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology in 3430, while seemingly distant, is a process that begins now. It’s not about waiting until 3429 to start thinking about it. It’s about laying the groundwork today, building a foundation of knowledge and innovation that future generations can build upon. Here’s how that R&D might look, spanning from now to then:

1. Foundational Research (Now – ~2100):

  • Fundamental Science: This involves pushing the boundaries of our understanding in physics, chemistry, biology, materials science, and other fields. Discoveries in these areas will be the basis for future technological breakthroughs. Think exploring new energy sources like advanced fusion or antimatter, understanding complex biological systems for bioremediation, or developing entirely new classes of materials.
  • Sustainability Science: This interdisciplinary field focuses specifically on understanding the complex interactions between human systems and the environment. It involves developing models and frameworks for assessing sustainability, identifying critical thresholds, and designing sustainable solutions.
  • Social and Behavioral Sciences: Understanding human behavior, decision-making, and social dynamics is crucial for developing and implementing sustainable technologies effectively. Research in these areas will help us design policies, incentives, and communication strategies that promote sustainable practices.

2. Applied Research and Development (2100 – ~2700):

  • Proof-of-Concept Prototypes: Building on the foundational research, scientists and engineers will develop prototypes of sustainable technologies. This involves translating scientific discoveries into practical applications, demonstrating feasibility, and identifying challenges. Imagine early-stage fusion reactors, atmospheric carbon capture systems, or advanced biomanufacturing platforms.
  • Materials Development: Creating new materials with specific properties will be crucial for many sustainable technologies. This includes developing materials that are lightweight, strong, durable, recyclable, biodegradable, or capable of capturing and storing energy.
  • Energy Systems Research: Developing and testing new energy generation, storage, and distribution technologies will be a major focus. This includes research on advanced solar power systems, geothermal energy, advanced batteries, and smart grids.

3. Technology Refinement and Scaling (2700 – ~3200):

  • Pilot Projects: Once proof-of-concept prototypes have been developed, pilot projects will be launched to test these technologies in real-world settings. This involves scaling up production, optimizing performance, and addressing any unforeseen challenges. Think of larger-scale carbon capture trials, testing advanced agricultural systems in different environments, or deploying smart city technologies in pilot communities.
  • Systems Integration: Integrating different sustainable technologies into complex systems will be crucial. For example, integrating renewable energy sources with smart grids, or combining vertical farms with waste recycling facilities.
  • Socioeconomic Research: Research will be conducted to assess the social, economic, and environmental impacts of sustainable technologies. This includes evaluating costs and benefits, identifying potential unintended consequences, and developing strategies for equitable implementation.

4. Deployment and Optimization (3200 – 3430):

  • Large-Scale Deployment: Sustainable technologies that have been successfully tested and refined will be deployed on a large scale. This involves building the necessary infrastructure, training personnel, and ensuring widespread access.
  • Continuous Improvement: Even after deployment, sustainable technologies will continue to be refined and optimized. This includes monitoring performance, identifying areas for improvement, and adapting to changing conditions.
  • Global Collaboration: International collaboration will be essential for sharing knowledge, resources, and best practices. This will ensure that sustainable technologies are deployed effectively and equitably around the world.

Key Considerations Throughout the R&D Process:

  • Sustainability Assessment: All research and development efforts should be guided by a strong focus on sustainability. This includes assessing the environmental, social, and economic impacts of technologies throughout their lifecycle.
  • Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations surrounding the development and use of sustainable technologies must be carefully addressed. This includes issues such as equity, access, and potential unintended consequences.
  • Education and Outreach: Educating the public about the importance of sustainable technology and engaging them in the process will be crucial for its successful adoption.

The R&D pathway for sustainable technology in 3430 is a marathon, not a sprint. It requires a long-term vision, sustained investment, and a commitment to collaboration and innovation. The work we do today will shape the world of 3430, making it crucial to start now.

COURTESY : Voith Group

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »