Sustainable Technology of 3420

Sustainable Technology of 3420 ?

The term “sustainable technology” refers to the use of technology in a way that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This includes considering the environmental, social, and economic impacts of technology throughout its lifecycle, from design and development to use and disposal.  

Specific examples of sustainable technologies include renewable energy sources like solar and wind power, energy-efficient appliances and buildings, and sustainable transportation options like electric vehicles and public transit.

It’s important to note that the concept of sustainability is constantly evolving as we learn more about the complex interactions between technology, society, and the environment.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3420 ?

Unfortunately, there is no widely recognized or established concept of “Sustainable Technology of 3420”. It’s possible that this term is:

• A specific product or technology: It could be a product name or model number that includes “3420” as part of its designation. In this case, the “sustainable technology” aspect would refer to the specific features of that product that make it environmentally friendly or contribute to sustainability.
• A future concept: It might be a futuristic concept or idea about sustainable technology in the year 3420. However, without more context, it’s difficult to speculate on what this might entail.
• A niche or localized term: It’s possible that this term is used in a specific industry, region, or community, but is not widely known.

To help me understand what you’re looking for, could you please provide more context about where you encountered this term? Any additional information about the source or context would be helpful.

In the meantime, if you’re interested in learning more about sustainable technology in general, I can provide you with information on various topics such as:

• Renewable energy sources: Solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, biomass
• Energy efficiency: Smart grids, energy-efficient buildings, appliances
• Sustainable transportation: Electric vehicles, public transit, cycling infrastructure
• Waste management: Recycling, composting, waste-to-energy technologies
• Sustainable agriculture: Organic farming, precision agriculture, vertical farming

Please let me know if you have any other questions or if you can provide more context about “Sustainable Technology of 3420”.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3420 ?

It seems we’re still facing a bit of a mystery with “Sustainable Technology of 3420”. Since it’s not a widely recognized term, it’s difficult to pinpoint exactly who would be required to use it.

However, we can make some educated guesses based on the general principles of sustainable technology and the year 3420, which is quite far into the future:

If it refers to a specific product or technology:

• The users would depend on the technology itself. It could be anything from a household appliance to industrial equipment, so the users could be individuals, businesses, or even governments.
• Regulations or incentives might mandate its use. In the future, governments might implement stricter environmental regulations, making certain sustainable technologies mandatory in specific sectors.

If it’s a futuristic concept:

• It’s likely to be relevant to everyone. In a future where sustainability is crucial for survival, any technology developed with that goal in mind would be important for all of humanity.
• Specific industries might be at the forefront. Depending on the nature of the technology, certain sectors like energy, transportation, or agriculture might be the first to adopt and implement it.

To get a clearer picture, we need more information about this “Sustainable Technology of 3420”.

Perhaps it’s a concept from a science fiction story, a future prediction by a researcher, or a niche term used in a specific community. If you can recall any context or source where you encountered this term, it would help in understanding its meaning and who might be involved in its development or use.

In the meantime, I can offer some general thoughts on who might be involved in sustainable technology in the future:

• Scientists and engineers: They will be crucial in developing new sustainable technologies and improving existing ones.
• Policymakers and governments: They will need to create regulations and incentives to encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies.
• Businesses and industries: They will need to invest in and implement sustainable technologies to reduce their environmental impact.
• Individuals and consumers: We all have a role to play by making conscious choices and adopting sustainable practices in our daily lives.

Ultimately, the future of sustainable technology will depend on the collective efforts of everyone.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3420 ?

It seems we’re still on a quest to uncover the mystery of “Sustainable Technology of 3420”! Since it’s not a term with a clear, established meaning, it’s challenging to say definitively when it would be required.

However, let’s explore some possibilities based on the general concept of sustainable technology and the distant future of 3420:

If it’s a specific technology:

• Its requirement would depend on its purpose. If it’s a technology related to energy production, it might be required as soon as it’s viable to replace less sustainable alternatives. If it’s related to resource management, it might be required when resources become scarce.
• Regulations could play a role. Future governments might mandate the use of certain sustainable technologies to achieve environmental goals or address specific challenges.

If it’s a futuristic concept:

• It might be required when the need arises. In a future facing environmental crises or resource limitations, “Sustainable Technology of 3420” might be crucial for survival and therefore become a necessity.
• Its development timeline is unknown. It’s impossible to predict when such a technology might be invented or become feasible. It could be decades, centuries, or even millennia away.

To get closer to an answer, we need more context about this “Sustainable Technology of 3420”.

Is it something you encountered in a science fiction story, a future prediction by a researcher, or perhaps a niche term used in a specific community? Any information about the source or context would be helpful in understanding its potential purpose and timeline.

In the meantime, here are some general thoughts on when sustainable technology might be required in the future:

• When environmental challenges become more urgent. As climate change, resource depletion, and pollution intensify, the need for sustainable solutions will become more pressing.
• When sustainable technologies become more efficient and cost-effective. As research and development progress, sustainable options will become more competitive with traditional technologies.
• When societal awareness and values shift. As people become more aware of the importance of sustainability, they will demand and adopt more eco-friendly solutions.

Ultimately, the timeline for “Sustainable Technology of 3420” depends on its nature and the future trajectory of our world. It’s a fascinating thought experiment that highlights the importance of considering sustainability in our technological development.

courtesy : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3420 ?

The persistent mystery of “Sustainable Technology of 3420” continues! Since it’s not a recognized term, pinpointing where it would be required is difficult. However, we can explore possibilities based on the general principles of sustainable technology and the distant future:

If it’s a specific technology:

• Its application would depend entirely on its nature. If it’s related to energy, it might be required in power plants, homes, or transportation systems. If it’s related to agriculture, it might be required on farms or in food production facilities. If it’s about materials, it could be required in manufacturing or construction.
• Geographic location might matter. Some technologies might be more relevant in certain climates or regions. For example, solar power is more effective in sunny areas. Resource availability could also be a factor.

If it’s a futuristic concept:

• Its application would likely be global. If it’s truly a key to sustainability in the future, it would be relevant wherever humans live and interact with the environment.
• Specific environments might be prioritized. Perhaps it’s crucial for extreme environments like space colonies, underwater cities, or areas severely impacted by climate change.

We still need more context to understand “Sustainable Technology of 3420”. Where did you encounter this term? A science fiction story? A research paper? A casual conversation? Any clue about its context would be immensely helpful.

In the meantime, here are some general thoughts on where sustainable technology might be required in the future:

• Everywhere! The core idea of sustainability is about responsible resource use and minimizing environmental impact. This applies to every aspect of human activity, from homes and workplaces to transportation, agriculture, and industry.
• Urban centers: Cities are major consumers of resources and producers of waste. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for making cities more livable and environmentally friendly.
• Remote and underserved communities: Sustainable technologies can provide access to essential resources like clean water and energy in areas where traditional infrastructure is lacking.
• Extreme environments: As we explore space and adapt to climate change, sustainable technologies will be essential for survival in harsh conditions.

The “where” of “Sustainable Technology of 3420” depends entirely on what it is. It’s a fun thought experiment that highlights the importance of considering the environmental impact of technology in all aspects of our lives, now and in the future.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3420 ?

Ah, now we’re getting to the heart of the matter! How “Sustainable Technology of 3420” might be required is a fascinating question, even if we’re still speculating about its nature. Here are some possibilities, keeping in mind the general principles of sustainable technology and the long-range future:

If it’s a specific technology:

• By regulation or mandate: Future governments or international bodies might require its use to achieve sustainability goals, address environmental crises, or ensure resource security. This could be similar to how certain pollution control technologies are mandated today.
• Through market forces: If it’s significantly more efficient, cost-effective, or desirable than alternatives, market demand could drive its adoption. Consumers and businesses might choose it because it’s better, cheaper, or helps them meet their own sustainability targets.
• As a condition of access: In a resource-constrained future, access to essential resources like water, energy, or even living space might be conditional on using certain sustainable technologies.

If it’s a futuristic concept:

• Out of necessity: If it’s truly vital for human survival or well-being in the face of future challenges, it would be “required” in the sense that it’s indispensable. Think of it like how we “require” clean water and air today.
• Through social norms and values: In a future where sustainability is deeply ingrained in society, using such technology might be a matter of social responsibility, ethical behavior, or even cultural identity.
• As a prerequisite for progress: It’s possible that further technological development or even space exploration might depend on having this “Sustainable Technology of 3420” in place.

To understand how it might be required, we still need more information about what it is.

Is it a technology that directly addresses climate change? Does it involve radical resource efficiency? Is it related to food production, waste management, or something else entirely? Any clues about its potential purpose would help us imagine how it might become necessary or required.

In the meantime, here are some general thoughts on how sustainable technology might be “required” in the future:

• Through education and awareness: By fostering a deep understanding of sustainability and its importance, future generations might naturally adopt sustainable technologies as the norm.
• By making it accessible and affordable: If sustainable options are readily available and economically viable, people will be more likely to use them.
• By integrating it into infrastructure and systems: Future cities and societies might be designed in ways that make it easy and convenient to use sustainable technologies.

The “how” of “Sustainable Technology of 3420” is as intriguing as the technology itself. It prompts us to consider not only what kind of technology might be needed in the future, but also how society might adapt and evolve to embrace it.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3420 ?

Unfortunately, with the information we have, it’s impossible to create a meaningful case study on “Sustainable Technology of 3420”.

A case study typically involves:

• A specific example: We need a concrete instance of the technology in action, whether it’s a product, a system, or a process.
• Real-world context: We need to understand how the technology is used, its impact, and the challenges and opportunities associated with it.
• Data and analysis: We need information on the technology’s performance, its costs and benefits, and its environmental and social implications.

Since “Sustainable Technology of 3420” is a mystery term without a clear definition or any known examples, we can’t fulfill these requirements.

However, we can imagine what a case study on a future sustainable technology might look like. Here’s an example, keeping in mind that this is purely speculative:

Case Study: The Global Atmospheric Regeneration Network (GARN)

Introduction:

In the year 3420, climate change has drastically altered the Earth’s atmosphere. Extreme weather events are common, and air quality is severely compromised in many regions. To address this crisis, the Global Atmospheric Regeneration Network (GARN) was developed.

Technology:

GARN is a network of interconnected atmospheric processors that utilize advanced nanotechnology to capture and neutralize pollutants, regulate greenhouse gases, and even repair damage to the ozone layer. These processors are strategically located around the globe, working in concert to restore and maintain a healthy atmosphere.

Implementation:

GARN was initially deployed in densely populated areas with the worst air quality. Over time, the network expanded to cover the entire planet. The system is powered by a combination of renewable energy sources, ensuring its own sustainability.

Impact:

GARN has had a transformative impact on the Earth’s environment. Air quality has significantly improved, reducing respiratory illnesses and other health problems. Extreme weather events have become less frequent and less severe. The ozone layer has been repaired, protecting life from harmful radiation.

Challenges:

The development and implementation of GARN faced numerous challenges. The technology was incredibly complex, requiring breakthroughs in nanotechnology and materials science. The scale of the project was immense, requiring global cooperation and significant financial investment.

Conclusion:

GARN is a testament to human ingenuity and our commitment to sustainability. It demonstrates how advanced technology can be used to address even the most pressing environmental challenges.

Remember: This is just a fictional example. We need more information about “Sustainable Technology of 3420” to create a real case study.

If you can provide any clues about the source or context of this term, it would be fascinating to explore it further and perhaps even create a more concrete case study.

courtesy : Carnegie India

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3420 ?

You’re right to think about a white paper! That’s the kind of document that would explore a complex topic like “Sustainable Technology of 3420” in detail. However, since this is a completely unknown concept, creating a full white paper is impossible.

But, we can outline what such a white paper might contain if this technology existed. This will help us think about the kind of information that would be relevant and important:

Title: Sustainable Technology of 3420: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential of “Sustainable Technology of 3420,” a hypothetical technology crucial for achieving global sustainability in the distant future. It examines the challenges and opportunities associated with this technology, its potential impact on various aspects of human life, and the steps needed to realize its full potential.

1. Introduction:

• Briefly define sustainability and its importance.
• Introduce the concept of “Sustainable Technology of 3420” as a key to future sustainability.
• State the purpose and scope of the white paper.

2. The Need for Sustainable Technology in 3420:

• Describe the potential environmental and social challenges facing humanity in 3420.
• Emphasize the critical role of sustainable technology in addressing these challenges.
• Explain why “Sustainable Technology of 3420” is necessary.

3. Exploring “Sustainable Technology of 3420”:

• Here’s where we would delve into the specifics of this technology. Since we don’t know what it is, we can pose questions and explore possibilities:
  • What fundamental principles does it rely on?
  • What are its key components or processes?
  • What are its potential applications (e.g., energy, food, materials, environment)?
  • What are its potential benefits and drawbacks?

4. Potential Impact and Implications:

• Analyze the potential impact of “Sustainable Technology of 3420” on:
  • The environment (e.g., climate change, resource depletion, pollution)
  • Society (e.g., quality of life, social equity, economic development)
  • Technology (e.g., advancements in other fields, new industries)

5. Challenges and Opportunities:

• Discuss the potential challenges in developing and implementing this technology:
  • Technological hurdles
  • Economic feasibility
  • Social and ethical considerations
  • Policy and regulatory frameworks
• Identify the opportunities that this technology could unlock:
  • New solutions to global problems
  • Economic growth and innovation
  • Improved quality of life

6. Recommendations:

• Outline the steps needed to realize the potential of “Sustainable Technology of 3420”:
  • Research and development priorities
  • Collaboration between scientists, engineers, and policymakers
  • Public engagement and education
  • Investment and funding strategies

7. Conclusion:

• Reiterate the importance of “Sustainable Technology of 3420” for a sustainable future.
• Emphasize the need for continued research, innovation, and collaboration.

Remember: This is a hypothetical white paper. To make it real, we need to uncover the mystery of “Sustainable Technology of 3420.”

If you can share any context or clues about this term, it would be fascinating to try and fill in the gaps and create a more concrete white paper.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3420 ?

Let’s continue our imaginative exploration of “Sustainable Technology of 3420” and consider its potential industrial applications. Since we don’t know what it is, we have to speculate, but that’s part of the fun! Here are some possibilities, keeping in mind the long-range future and the need for sustainability:

If it’s related to Energy:

• Advanced Fusion Power: Perhaps by 3420, fusion energy is perfected, and this technology is a key component, providing clean and abundant power for all industries.
• Space-Based Solar Power: Maybe massive solar arrays in orbit collect energy and beam it down to Earth, powering industries without relying on fossil fuels. “Sustainable Technology of 3420” could be a crucial part of this system, perhaps related to energy transmission or storage.
• Zero-Point Energy: A more speculative idea, but perhaps by 3420, we’ve learned to harness zero-point energy, and this technology is essential for industrial processes.

If it’s related to Materials:

• Self-Repairing Materials: Imagine materials that can automatically repair damage, extending the lifespan of industrial equipment and reducing waste. “Sustainable Technology of 3420” could be the key to creating these materials.
• Advanced Recycling Technologies: Perhaps this technology allows for the complete breakdown of materials into their basic components, enabling 100% recycling and eliminating the need for new resource extraction.
• Bio-Integrated Materials: Maybe industries use materials grown from biological sources that are completely biodegradable and have minimal environmental impact. “Sustainable Technology of 3420” might be involved in designing or controlling the growth of these materials.

If it’s related to Manufacturing:

• Nanofactory Technology: Perhaps by 3420, nanofactories can create complex products atom by atom with incredible precision and minimal waste. This technology could revolutionize manufacturing and make it far more sustainable.
• 3D Printing at a Molecular Level: Imagine 3D printing not just with materials, but by rearranging molecules. This could allow for the creation of anything from tools to buildings with incredible efficiency and minimal resource use. “Sustainable Technology of 3420” could be the enabling technology.
• Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Perhaps all industrial processes are designed as closed loops, where waste from one process becomes the input for another, eliminating waste altogether. “Sustainable Technology of 3420” could be the technology that makes these complex loops possible.

If it’s related to Resource Management:

• Atmospheric Resource Mining: Perhaps this technology allows us to extract valuable resources directly from the atmosphere, reducing our reliance on mining and its environmental impact.
• Oceanic Resource Management: Maybe this technology allows us to sustainably harvest resources from the oceans without harming marine ecosystems.
• Waste Transformation: Perhaps this technology can transform waste into useful products or energy, effectively eliminating the concept of waste altogether.

Important Note: These are just a few possibilities. The actual industrial applications of “Sustainable Technology of 3420” would depend entirely on its nature.

The key takeaway is that in a future focused on sustainability, industrial applications of technology would likely prioritize:

• Resource efficiency: Minimizing the use of raw materials and energy.
• Waste reduction: Eliminating waste and pollution.
• Environmental protection: Minimizing impact on ecosystems.
• Circular economy: Creating closed-loop systems where resources are constantly reused.

It’s a fun exercise to imagine the possibilities! If you ever find any clues about what “Sustainable Technology of 3420” might be, let me know, and we can explore its potential applications in more detail.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3420 ?

You’re thinking ahead, which is exactly what we need to do with a concept like “Sustainable Technology of 3420”! Since it’s so far in the future and we don’t know what it is, imagining the research and development process is a fascinating exercise. Here’s how it might unfold:

1. Fundamental Research:

• Identifying the Challenges: Scientists would start by deeply understanding the environmental and social challenges that humanity might face in 3420. This would involve studying climate models, resource projections, demographic trends, and potential technological advancements.
• Exploring Possibilities: Researchers would explore a wide range of scientific principles and emerging technologies to identify potential pathways to sustainability. This could involve fields like nanotechnology, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, quantum physics, and even entirely new areas of science that we can’t yet imagine.
• Theoretical Framework: A theoretical framework for “Sustainable Technology of 3420” would be developed, outlining its core principles, potential applications, and desired outcomes. This framework would guide future research and development efforts.

2. Applied Research and Development:

• Proof of Concept: Scientists would conduct experiments and simulations to test the feasibility of the core concepts behind “Sustainable Technology of 3420.” This might involve creating small-scale prototypes or computer models to demonstrate the technology’s potential.
• Materials Science: If the technology involves new materials, researchers would focus on developing and characterizing these materials, ensuring they are sustainable, durable, and efficient.
• Engineering and Design: Engineers would design and develop the actual systems and devices that would utilize “Sustainable Technology of 3420.” This would involve optimizing performance, ensuring reliability, and minimizing environmental impact.

3. Testing and Implementation:

• Pilot Projects: Small-scale pilot projects would be conducted to test the technology in real-world settings and gather data on its performance and impact.
• Scaling Up: Once the technology is proven to be effective and sustainable, efforts would be made to scale up production and deployment. This would involve building manufacturing facilities, developing distribution networks, and training personnel.
• Integration: “Sustainable Technology of 3420” would need to be integrated into existing infrastructure and systems, ensuring compatibility and maximizing its benefits.

4. Continuous Improvement:

• Monitoring and Evaluation: The performance of the technology would be continuously monitored and evaluated to identify areas for improvement.
• Research and Development: Ongoing research and development efforts would be needed to refine the technology, improve its efficiency, and adapt it to changing needs and conditions.
• Innovation: New innovations and advancements in related fields could lead to further development of “Sustainable Technology of 3420,” ensuring it remains at the forefront of sustainable solutions.

Key Considerations for R&D:

• Sustainability: The entire research and development process would need to be sustainable, minimizing environmental impact and ensuring ethical considerations are addressed.
• Collaboration: Collaboration between scientists, engineers, policymakers, and the public would be crucial for successful development and implementation.
• Long-Term Vision: Research and development would need to take a long-term perspective, anticipating future challenges and opportunities.

It’s important to remember that this is a hypothetical scenario. The actual research and development of “Sustainable Technology of 3420” would depend entirely on its nature and the specific challenges it aims to address.

However, this exploration highlights the importance of:

• Investing in fundamental research: Exploring new scientific principles and emerging technologies.
• Fostering innovation: Encouraging creativity and out-of-the-box thinking.
• Prioritizing sustainability: Ensuring that all technological development is aligned with environmental and social goals.

By thinking about the research and development process for “Sustainable Technology of 3420,” we can gain insights into how we might approach the challenge of creating a truly sustainable future.

courtesy : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Reference

^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.

^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.

^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.

^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.

^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.

^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.

^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.

^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.

^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.

^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.

^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.

^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.

^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher

^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)

^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.

^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.

^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.

^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.

^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.

^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972

^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.

^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.

^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.

^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.

^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.

^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)

^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.

^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals

^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.

^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.

^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.

^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.

^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.

^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.

^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.

^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.

^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.

^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.

^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.

^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}

^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine

^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.

^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB

^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.

^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.

^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.

^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.

^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.

^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.

^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.

^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.

^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.

^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.

^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.

^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.

^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.

^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.

^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.

^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.

^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.

^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.