Sustainable Technology of 3410

Sustainable Technology of 3410 ?

Sustainable technology encompasses the use of technology to address environmental and societal challenges. It involves developing and using technologies that minimize environmental impact, conserve resources, and promote social equity.  

Key Principles of Sustainable Technology:

• Resource Efficiency: Technologies that reduce the consumption of raw materials, energy, and water.
• Pollution Reduction: Minimizing or eliminating the release of pollutants into the air, water, and soil.  
• Waste Reduction: Designing products and processes that generate minimal waste and promote recycling and reuse.  
• Renewable Energy: Utilizing renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.  
• Life Cycle Assessment: Evaluating the environmental impact of a technology throughout its entire life cycle, from production to disposal.  

Examples of Sustainable Technology:

• Renewable Energy Technologies: Solar panels, wind turbines, hydropower systems, and biomass energy.
• Energy-Efficient Appliances: LED lighting, energy-efficient refrigerators, and smart thermostats.
• Green Building Materials: Recycled materials, sustainably harvested wood, and low-VOC paints.
• Electric Vehicles: Battery-powered cars, buses, and trucks that reduce emissions.  
• Water Conservation Technologies: Low-flow toilets, rainwater harvesting systems, and efficient irrigation systems.
• Precision Agriculture: Using technology to optimize crop production while minimizing resource use and environmental impact.  

Benefits of Sustainable Technology:

• Environmental Protection: Reducing pollution, conserving resources, and mitigating climate change.  
• Economic Growth: Creating new jobs and industries, and promoting innovation.  
• Social Equity: Improving access to resources and opportunities for all people.  
• Enhanced Quality of Life: Creating healthier and more sustainable communities.  

Challenges of Sustainable Technology:

• Cost: Sustainable technologies can sometimes be more expensive to develop and implement.  
• Infrastructure: Implementing sustainable technologies may require new infrastructure or modifications to existing infrastructure.  
• Policy and Regulation: Supportive policies and regulations are needed to encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies.  
• Public Awareness: Raising public awareness about the benefits of sustainable technology is crucial for its widespread adoption.

The Future of Sustainable Technology:

Sustainable technology is a rapidly evolving field with great potential to address the world’s most pressing challenges. Ongoing research and development are leading to new and innovative solutions that are more efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly. As awareness of the importance of sustainability grows, the adoption of these technologies is expected to increase, leading to a more sustainable future for all.   Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 3410 ?

Unfortunately, I couldn’t find any specific information about “Sustainable Technology of 3410”. It’s possible that this term refers to a very specific concept, a niche area within sustainable technology, or perhaps even a fictional concept.

However, I can offer some potential interpretations and directions for further exploration:

Possible Interpretations:

• A Specific Technology: It could be a name or code for a particular sustainable technology, perhaps related to a specific industry or application.
• A Future Concept: It might refer to a concept or technology that is still in development or being imagined for the future.
• A Misunderstanding: There might be a slight error in the term, or it could be a less common way of referring to a broader area of sustainable technology.

Further Exploration:

• Context: If you encountered this term in a specific context (e.g., a book, article, or presentation), providing that context could help in understanding its meaning.
• Keywords: Try searching online using related keywords, such as “sustainable technology 3410”, “future sustainable technologies”, or “advanced sustainable technology”.
• Experts: Reaching out to experts in the field of sustainable technology or related areas might provide some insights.

General Information on Sustainable Technology:

While I couldn’t find specific information on “Sustainable Technology of 3410”, I can reiterate the key aspects of sustainable technology in general:

• It aims to minimize environmental impact and promote social equity.  
• It encompasses various technologies and practices across different sectors.  
• It involves resource efficiency, pollution reduction, waste management, and the use of renewable energy.  
• It is crucial for addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion.  

If you can provide more context or details about where you encountered this term, I may be able to offer more specific information or guidance.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3410 ?

While I couldn’t find specific information about “Sustainable Technology of 3410”, the need for sustainable technology in general is universal. It’s not limited to any specific group or entity. However, the urgency and specific applications might vary depending on the context. Here’s a breakdown of who needs sustainable technology and why:

1. Individuals:

• Why: To reduce their environmental footprint, conserve resources, and improve their quality of life.  
• Examples: Using energy-efficient appliances, adopting sustainable transportation (walking, cycling, public transport, electric vehicles), reducing waste, and making conscious consumption choices.

2. Businesses:

• Why: To enhance brand reputation, attract and retain talent, meet regulatory requirements, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.  
• Examples: Implementing sustainable supply chains, using renewable energy, adopting circular economy models, and investing in green technologies.

3. Governments:

• Why: To address environmental challenges, promote economic growth, improve public health, and ensure social equity.
• Examples: Investing in renewable energy infrastructure, implementing policies to encourage sustainable practices, and supporting research and development in sustainable technology.

4. Communities:

• Why: To create more sustainable and resilient communities, improve access to resources, and enhance quality of life.  
• Examples: Developing community gardens, implementing local renewable energy projects, and promoting sustainable transportation options.

5. Industries:

• Why: To reduce environmental impact, improve resource efficiency, and meet growing consumer demand for sustainable products and services.
• Examples: Developing green building materials, adopting sustainable manufacturing processes, and investing in renewable energy.

6. Global Organizations:

• Why: To address global challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and biodiversity loss.  
• Examples: Promoting international cooperation on sustainable development, setting global standards for sustainable practices, and supporting developing countries in their transition to sustainable technologies.

In essence, everyone has a role to play in adopting and promoting sustainable technology. The specific needs and applications may vary, but the overall goal is the same: to create a more sustainable future for all.

If “Sustainable Technology of 3410” refers to a specific technology or concept, the specific stakeholders might be more limited. However, the general principles of sustainability and the need for responsible technology apply to all.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3410 ?

Unfortunately, I still don’t have any information about “Sustainable Technology of 3410”. It’s possible this is a very niche term, a fictional concept, or perhaps there’s a slight error in the term.

However, I can talk about when sustainable technology, in general, is required. The answer is: Now, more than ever!

Here’s why:

• Urgent Environmental Challenges: We are facing pressing environmental issues like climate change, resource depletion, pollution, and biodiversity loss. Sustainable technology offers solutions to mitigate these challenges and protect our planet.  
• Growing Population: The global population is increasing, and with it, the demand for resources and energy. Sustainable technology can help us meet these needs in a way that doesn’t harm the environment.  
• Economic Benefits: Sustainable technology can drive economic growth by creating new jobs, industries, and markets. It can also improve efficiency and reduce costs for businesses.  
• Social Equity: Sustainable technology can help address social inequalities by improving access to resources, creating healthier communities, and promoting sustainable development.  
• Technological Advancements: We have the knowledge and tools to develop and implement sustainable technologies across various sectors. Continued innovation is crucial to finding even more effective solutions.

In short, the need for sustainable technology is immediate and critical. We need to adopt sustainable practices and technologies in all aspects of our lives, from the way we generate energy to the products we consume.

While I can’t provide specific information on “Sustainable Technology of 3410”, I encourage you to explore the broader field of sustainable technology. It’s a fascinating and crucial area with the potential to transform our world for the better.

If you can provide any additional context or details about where you encountered this term, I’ll do my best to assist you further.Sources and related content

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3410 ?

As mentioned before, I haven’t been able to find any information on “Sustainable Technology of 3410.” It’s possible this is a very specific term, a fictional concept, or perhaps there’s a slight typo.

However, I can discuss where sustainable technology, in general, is required. The answer is: Everywhere! Sustainability needs to be integrated into all aspects of our lives and across all sectors. Here are some key areas where sustainable technology is crucial:  

• Energy Sector: Transitioning to renewable energy sources (solar, wind, hydro, geothermal) and improving energy efficiency are essential to combat climate change.  
• Transportation: Developing and adopting electric vehicles, improving public transportation, and promoting sustainable transportation options like walking and cycling are vital for reducing emissions and improving air quality.  
• Agriculture: Sustainable agriculture practices, including precision farming, water conservation, and reducing the use of pesticides and fertilizers, are necessary to ensure food security and minimize environmental impact.  
• Manufacturing: Adopting sustainable manufacturing processes, using recycled materials, and minimizing waste are crucial for reducing resource depletion and pollution.  
• Construction: Building green buildings with energy-efficient designs, using sustainable building materials, and minimizing construction waste are essential for creating sustainable cities.  
• Water Management: Developing and implementing water conservation technologies, improving water infrastructure, and managing water resources sustainably are crucial for addressing water scarcity.  
• Waste Management: Reducing waste generation, promoting recycling and reuse, and developing sustainable waste management systems are essential for minimizing pollution and conserving resources.  
• Information and Communication Technology (ICT): Developing energy-efficient ICT devices and infrastructure, promoting responsible e-waste management, and using ICT to support sustainability initiatives are crucial for minimizing the environmental footprint of the digital age.  

Beyond these specific sectors, sustainable technology is also needed in:

• Homes: Using energy-efficient appliances, conserving water, and adopting sustainable consumption habits.  
• Communities: Developing community gardens, implementing local renewable energy projects, and promoting sustainable transportation options.
• Businesses: Adopting sustainable business practices, investing in green technologies, and promoting sustainable supply chains.  
• Governments: Implementing policies to encourage sustainable practices, investing in sustainable infrastructure, and supporting research and development in sustainable technology.  

Essentially, sustainable technology is required anywhere human activity takes place. It’s a global imperative that requires collaboration and innovation across all sectors and at all levels.

If you can provide any more context about where you encountered the term “Sustainable Technology of 3410,” I’ll do my best to help.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3410 ?

I understand you’re trying to learn about “Sustainable Technology of 3410,” but unfortunately, I still haven’t been able to find any information on that specific term. It’s possible it’s a very niche concept, a fictional idea, or perhaps there’s a slight misunderstanding or typo in the term.

However, I can discuss how sustainable technology, in general, is implemented and made effective. Here’s a breakdown of the key elements:

1. Research and Development:

• Investing in research to develop new sustainable technologies and improve existing ones. This includes exploring new materials, energy sources, and processes.  

2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship:

• Creating an environment that fosters innovation and supports entrepreneurs who are developing and commercializing sustainable technologies.

3. Policy and Regulation:

• Implementing policies and regulations that incentivize the adoption of sustainable technologies and discourage unsustainable practices. This can include carbon pricing, renewable energy mandates, and environmental regulations.  

4. Education and Awareness:

• Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technology. This includes educating consumers, businesses, and policymakers.  

5. Investment and Financing:

• Providing financial support for the development and deployment of sustainable technologies. This can include government funding, private investment, and green bonds.

6. Collaboration and Partnerships:

• Fostering collaboration between researchers, businesses, governments, and other stakeholders to accelerate the development and adoption of sustainable technologies.  

7. Standards and Certification:

• Developing standards and certification programs to ensure the quality and sustainability of products and services.  

8. Infrastructure Development:

• Investing in the infrastructure needed to support sustainable technologies, such as renewable energy grids, electric vehicle charging stations, and public transportation systems.

9. Life Cycle Assessment:

• Evaluating the environmental impact of technologies throughout their entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal, to identify opportunities for improvement.  

10. Continuous Improvement:

• Constantly seeking ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of sustainable technologies and to reduce their environmental impact.

In short, implementing sustainable technology requires a multi-faceted approach that involves research, innovation, policy, education, investment, collaboration, and a commitment to continuous improvement.

While I can’t tell you how specifically “Sustainable Technology of 3410” is required (due to the lack of information on that term), these general principles apply to all areas of sustainable technology. If you happen to recall any additional details about where you came across this term, please let me know, and I’ll do my best to assist you further.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3410 ?

I understand you’re looking for a case study related to “Sustainable Technology of 3410.” Unfortunately, because I can’t find any information about what “Sustainable Technology of 3410” actually is, I can’t provide a relevant case study. It’s possible this term is very specific, fictional, or perhaps there’s a slight error in the term.

However, I can offer you examples of case studies related to general sustainable technologies. These examples might give you a better idea of what a sustainable technology case study looks like and how such studies are structured. You could then potentially adapt some of these principles if you ever find out more about “Sustainable Technology of 3410”.

Here are some examples of areas where sustainable technology case studies are common:

• Renewable Energy:
  • Case Study Example: A case study on the implementation of a large-scale solar farm in a specific region, analyzing its environmental impact, economic benefits, and social effects. This could include details on the technology used, the challenges faced, and the lessons learned.
• Electric Vehicles:
  • Case Study Example: A case study on the adoption of electric buses in a city, examining the impact on air quality, cost savings, and public acceptance. This could discuss the charging infrastructure, battery technology, and the transition process.
• Green Buildings:
  • Case Study Example: A case study on the design and construction of a LEED-certified building, highlighting the sustainable materials used, energy-efficient systems, and water conservation measures. This could include data on energy consumption, cost savings, and occupant satisfaction.
• Sustainable Agriculture:
  • Case Study Example: A case study on a farm that has transitioned to sustainable farming practices, such as no-till farming, crop rotation, and integrated pest management. The study could analyze the impact on soil health, water usage, and crop yields.
• Waste Management:
  • Case Study Example: A case study on a city that has implemented a successful recycling program, examining the reduction in landfill waste, the cost of the program, and public participation rates.

General Structure of a Sustainable Technology Case Study:

1. Introduction: Briefly introduce the sustainable technology or project being studied and its context.
2. Background: Provide background information on the technology, including its principles, applications, and history.
3. Case Description: Describe the specific case being studied, including the location, stakeholders, and objectives.
4. Methodology: Explain the methods used to collect and analyze data, such as surveys, interviews, and environmental monitoring.
5. Results: Present the findings of the study, including data on environmental impact, economic performance, and social effects.
6. Discussion: Analyze the results and discuss the key findings, challenges, and lessons learned.
7. Conclusion: Summarize the main points of the study and offer recommendations for future research or implementation.

If you can provide any additional details about “Sustainable Technology of 3410”, I’ll do my best to help. Even a single word or a vague context might help in the search.

COURTESY : Carnegie India

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3410 ?

I understand you’re interested in a white paper on “Sustainable Technology of 3410.” However, as I’ve mentioned before, I haven’t been able to find any information on that specific term. It’s possible it’s a very niche concept, a fictional idea, or perhaps there’s a slight misunderstanding or typo in the term.

Nevertheless, I can offer you some general information about white papers on sustainable technology and what they typically cover. This might be helpful if you ever come across more information about “Sustainable Technology of 3410” in the future.

What is a White Paper?

A white paper is a document, usually published by a company or organization, that provides in-depth information on a specific topic. It’s often used to educate readers about a particular issue, technology, or solution. White papers are typically more detailed and technical than marketing materials.

Content of a Sustainable Technology White Paper:

A white paper on sustainable technology might cover a variety of topics, including:

• Overview of the Technology: A detailed explanation of the sustainable technology being discussed, including its principles, applications, and benefits.
• Challenges and Opportunities: An analysis of the challenges associated with implementing the technology, as well as the opportunities it presents.
• Case Studies: Examples of how the technology has been successfully implemented in real-world scenarios.
• Technical Specifications: Detailed technical information about the technology, such as its performance characteristics, efficiency, and cost.
• Policy and Regulatory Landscape: A discussion of the relevant policies and regulations that impact the technology.
• Future Trends: An outlook on the future of the technology and its potential impact on sustainability.
• Recommendations: Recommendations for how to overcome challenges and maximize the benefits of the technology.

Purpose of a Sustainable Technology White Paper:

The purpose of a white paper on sustainable technology can vary, but it often includes:

• Education: To educate readers about a specific sustainable technology and its potential benefits.
• Thought Leadership: To establish the author or organization as a thought leader in the field of sustainable technology.
• Problem Solving: To propose solutions to challenges related to sustainability.
• Advocacy: To advocate for the adoption of sustainable technologies and policies.

Finding White Papers:

You can often find white papers on sustainable technology by searching online, visiting the websites of companies and organizations involved in sustainable technology, and checking academic databases.

While I can’t provide a white paper specifically on “Sustainable Technology of 3410” due to the lack of information on that term, I hope this general information about white papers on sustainable technology is helpful. If you happen to recall any additional details about where you encountered this term, please let me know, and I’ll do my best to assist you further.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3410 ?

Unfortunately, I still haven’t been able to find any information on “Sustainable Technology of 3410.” It’s possible this is a very niche concept, a fictional idea, or perhaps there’s a slight misunderstanding or typo in the term.

However, I can discuss the industrial applications of general sustainable technologies. Many industries are adopting sustainable practices and technologies to reduce their environmental impact, improve efficiency, and meet growing consumer demand for sustainable products. Here are some key examples:  

1. Manufacturing:

• Sustainable Materials: Using recycled materials, bio-based plastics, and other sustainable alternatives to reduce reliance on virgin resources.  
• Energy Efficiency: Implementing energy-efficient processes, using renewable energy sources, and reducing waste to minimize energy consumption.  
• Circular Economy: Designing products for disassembly and reuse, promoting recycling and waste reduction, and adopting closed-loop systems.  
• Examples: Using recycled aluminum in car manufacturing, adopting closed-loop water systems in textile factories, and using bioplastics in packaging.

2. Energy:

• Renewable Energy: Shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources like solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power.
• Smart Grids: Developing smart grids to optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.  
• Energy Storage: Investing in energy storage technologies to ensure a reliable supply of renewable energy.  
• Examples: Building large-scale solar farms, developing offshore wind farms, and investing in battery storage systems.

3. Construction:

• Green Buildings: Designing and constructing buildings with energy-efficient systems, sustainable materials, and water conservation measures.  
• Modular Construction: Using modular construction techniques to reduce waste and improve efficiency.  
• Sustainable Infrastructure: Developing sustainable transportation systems, water management systems, and other infrastructure.  
• Examples: Building LEED-certified buildings, using recycled materials in construction, and developing electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

4. Agriculture:

• Precision Agriculture: Using technology to optimize crop production while minimizing resource use and environmental impact.  
• Sustainable Farming Practices: Adopting no-till farming, crop rotation, and other sustainable practices to improve soil health and reduce environmental impact.  
• Organic Farming: Growing crops without the use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers.
• Examples: Using drones to monitor crop health, implementing drip irrigation systems, and adopting organic farming practices.  

5. Transportation:

• Electric Vehicles: Shifting from gasoline-powered vehicles to electric vehicles to reduce emissions.
• Alternative Fuels: Developing and using alternative fuels like biofuels and hydrogen.
• Sustainable Transportation Systems: Investing in public transportation, bike-sharing programs, and other sustainable transportation options.
• Examples: Manufacturing electric cars, developing hydrogen fuel cell buses, and building high-speed rail networks.

6. Waste Management:

• Waste Reduction: Reducing waste generation through source reduction, reuse, and recycling.  
• Composting: Composting organic waste to create nutrient-rich soil.  
• Waste-to-Energy: Converting waste into energy through incineration or other processes.  
• Examples: Implementing city-wide recycling programs, building composting facilities, and developing waste-to-energy plants.

These are just a few examples of the many industrial applications of sustainable technology. As technology continues to advance and awareness of sustainability grows, we can expect to see even more industries adopting sustainable practices and technologies in the future.

If you can provide any additional details about “Sustainable Technology of 3410”, I’ll do my best to help. Even a single word or a vague context might help in the search.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3410 ?

As I’ve mentioned before, I haven’t been able to find any information on “Sustainable Technology of 3410.” It’s possible it’s a very niche concept, a fictional idea, or perhaps there’s a slight misunderstanding or typo in the term.

However, I can discuss research and development (R&D) in general sustainable technologies. R&D is absolutely crucial for advancing sustainable technology and finding innovative solutions to our environmental challenges. Here are some key areas of focus:  

1. Renewable Energy:

• Improving Efficiency: Research is focused on increasing the efficiency of solar panels, wind turbines, and other renewable energy technologies to make them more cost-effective and competitive with fossil fuels.  
• Energy Storage: Developing better energy storage solutions, such as batteries and pumped hydro storage, to address the intermittency of renewable energy sources.
• New Materials: Exploring new materials for solar cells, wind turbine blades, and other components to improve performance and durability.

2. Energy Efficiency:

• Smart Grids: Developing smart grids to optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.  
• Advanced Materials: Researching new materials for insulation, lighting, and other applications to improve energy efficiency in buildings and other sectors.
• Behavioral Science: Studying how to encourage people to adopt energy-saving behaviors.

3. Sustainable Transportation:

• Battery Technology: Improving battery technology for electric vehicles to increase range, reduce charging time, and lower costs.  
• Alternative Fuels: Developing and researching alternative fuels like biofuels and hydrogen for transportation.
• Autonomous Vehicles: Exploring the potential of autonomous vehicles to improve fuel efficiency and reduce congestion.

4. Sustainable Agriculture:

• Precision Agriculture: Developing and improving precision agriculture technologies to optimize resource use and reduce environmental impact.  
• Crop Improvement: Researching and developing crop varieties that are more resistant to drought, pests, and diseases.  
• Sustainable Farming Practices: Studying and promoting sustainable farming practices like no-till farming and crop rotation.

5. Waste Management:

• Recycling Technologies: Developing new and improved recycling technologies to increase recycling rates and reduce waste.  
• Waste-to-Energy: Researching and developing more efficient and cleaner waste-to-energy technologies.
• Biodegradable Materials: Developing new biodegradable materials to replace traditional plastics.  

6. Environmental Remediation:

• Pollution Control: Researching and developing new technologies to control pollution and clean up contaminated sites.  
• Carbon Capture and Storage: Developing and improving carbon capture and storage technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  
• Climate Change Mitigation: Researching and developing strategies to mitigate the impacts of climate change.

General Research and Development Approaches:

• Materials Science: Exploring and developing new materials with improved properties for sustainable technologies.
• Nanotechnology: Applying nanotechnology to develop more efficient and sustainable materials and devices.  
• Biotechnology: Using biotechnology to develop sustainable solutions in areas like agriculture and waste management.  
• Artificial Intelligence: Applying artificial intelligence to optimize energy use, improve resource management, and accelerate the development of sustainable technologies.  

Key Actors in Sustainable Technology R&D:

• Universities: Conducting basic and applied research in sustainable technology.  
• Government Agencies: Funding research and development and setting policy priorities.  
• Private Companies: Investing in research and development to develop new sustainable technologies and products.  
• Non-profit Organizations: Supporting research and development and promoting sustainable technology.

In conclusion, research and development is essential for driving innovation in sustainable technology and addressing the urgent need for sustainable solutions. Continued investment and collaboration in R&D are crucial for creating a more sustainable future.

If you can provide any additional details about “Sustainable Technology of 3410”, I’ll do my best to help. Even a single word or a vague context might help in the search.Sources and related content

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.