Sustainable Technology of 3400

Sustainable Technology of 3400 ?

It seems like there might be a misunderstanding in your question. The year 3400 is far in the future, and it’s impossible to predict exactly what sustainable technologies will exist then. However, we can discuss the general direction of sustainable technology and some potential future developments.

Current Trends in Sustainable Technology

Sustainable technology aims to minimize environmental impact and promote resource efficiency. Here are some key areas of focus:

• Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power are becoming increasingly important as alternatives to fossil fuels.
• Energy Efficiency: Technologies that reduce energy consumption, such as smart grids and energy-efficient appliances, are crucial for sustainability.
• Waste Management: Innovations in recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy processes help minimize pollution and conserve resources.
• Sustainable Agriculture: Practices that reduce environmental impact and promote biodiversity, such as precision farming and organic agriculture, are essential for food security.
• Green Building: Construction and design that prioritize energy efficiency, resource conservation, and reduced environmental impact.

Potential Future Developments

While it’s difficult to predict the future, here are some potential developments in sustainable technology:

• Advanced Energy Storage: More efficient and affordable energy storage solutions will be crucial for the widespread adoption of renewable energy.
• Carbon Capture and Storage: Technologies that capture carbon dioxide emissions from industrial processes and store them underground could help mitigate climate change.
• Sustainable Materials: Development of new materials that are renewable, recyclable, and have a lower environmental impact.
• Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: AI and machine learning can optimize energy use, improve waste management, and support sustainable agriculture.

Important Considerations

It’s important to remember that technology alone cannot solve sustainability challenges. Social, economic, and political factors also play a crucial role. To ensure a sustainable future, we need to adopt a holistic approach that considers all these factors.

If you have any other questions or want to explore specific areas of sustainable technology, feel free to ask!

What is Sustainable Technology of 3400 ?

While it’s exciting to imagine the possibilities of sustainable technology in the distant future, it’s impossible to know for sure what it will look like in 3400. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments:

Potential Features of Sustainable Technology in 3400:

• Highly Advanced Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources will likely be the dominant forms of energy production. We might see space-based solar power stations, advanced fusion reactors, or even entirely new forms of energy generation that we can’t even conceive of today.
• Closed-Loop Resource Systems: Technologies that enable the complete recycling and reuse of resources will be essential. This could involve advanced material science, nanotechnology, and bio-integrated systems that mimic natural ecosystems.
• Global-Scale Environmental Monitoring and Management: A network of sensors and AI systems could constantly monitor the health of the planet and proactively manage environmental challenges like climate change, pollution, and resource depletion.
• Personalized and Localized Sustainable Solutions: Technology might allow for highly personalized and localized solutions to sustainability challenges. This could involve things like personalized energy generation and storage, on-demand recycling and waste processing, and localized food production using advanced agricultural technologies.
• Integration of Technology with Nature: We might see a greater integration of technology with nature, such as buildings that function as living ecosystems, or energy systems that harness the power of natural processes.

Challenges and Considerations:

• Ethical Considerations: As technology advances, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of its use. We’ll need to ensure that sustainable technologies are used in a way that benefits all of humanity and protects the environment.
• Accessibility and Equity: It’s important to ensure that the benefits of sustainable technology are accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.
• Unforeseen Consequences: As with any technological advancement, there could be unforeseen consequences to the widespread adoption of sustainable technologies. We’ll need to be vigilant and adapt to any challenges that arise.

The Importance of Imagination and Innovation:

While we can’t predict the future with certainty, it’s important to use our imagination and creativity to envision the possibilities of sustainable technology. By fostering innovation and collaboration, we can work towards a future where technology helps us create a thriving and sustainable world for generations to come.

It’s important to remember that the future of sustainable technology depends on the choices we make today. By investing in research and development, promoting sustainable practices, and fostering a global commitment to environmental protection, we can pave the way for a brighter future.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3400 ?

It’s interesting to think about who would need sustainable technology in 3400! Here’s a breakdown of potential beneficiaries:

• Humanity: This is the most obvious answer. Sustainable technology would be essential for ensuring the survival and well-being of human civilization in 3400. It would help us address challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution, ensuring a habitable planet for future generations.
• The Environment: Sustainable technology would play a crucial role in protecting and restoring the environment. It would help preserve biodiversity, protect ecosystems, and mitigate the impacts of human activity on the planet.
• Other Species: Many other species on Earth would also benefit from sustainable technology. By protecting ecosystems and preserving biodiversity, we can ensure that other species continue to thrive alongside humanity.
• Future Generations: Sustainable technology is about more than just meeting our current needs. It’s also about ensuring that future generations have the resources and a healthy environment they need to thrive.

Here are some specific examples of how different groups might rely on sustainable technology in 3400:

• Individuals: Individuals might rely on personalized sustainable technology for things like energy generation, food production, and waste management.
• Communities: Communities might use sustainable technology to manage their resources, infrastructure, and public services in an environmentally responsible way.
• Governments: Governments might use sustainable technology to monitor the environment, manage resources, and develop policies that promote sustainability.
• Businesses: Businesses might use sustainable technology to reduce their environmental impact, improve efficiency, and develop new sustainable products and services.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 3400 would be essential for creating a world where humanity and nature can coexist in harmony. It would be a crucial tool for ensuring a healthy planet and a thriving future for all.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3400 ?

This is a fascinating question! It gets at the heart of why we talk about sustainable technology in the first place. Here’s how I’d break down the “when” of needing sustainable technology in 3400:

• It’s already required! The need for sustainable technology isn’t something that suddenly appears in 3400. The decisions we make today about technology and the environment will determine whether sustainable technology is even available or effective in the future.
• The urgency increases over time: As we continue to use resources and impact the environment, the need for sustainable solutions becomes more pressing. The challenges of climate change, pollution, and resource depletion are growing, and they won’t magically disappear on their own.
• 3400 is a consequence: The world of 3400, with its potential reliance on highly advanced sustainable technology, is a result of actions taken (or not taken) in the centuries leading up to it. If we don’t prioritize sustainability now, the world of 3400 might be facing even more severe environmental crises, making those advanced technologies absolutely essential for survival.

Think of it like this:

Imagine a city that’s constantly polluting its air and water. If they don’t start adopting sustainable practices now, by the time 3400 rolls around, the city might be uninhabitable. Even the most amazing technological solutions might not be enough to fix the damage.

In short: The need for sustainable technology is now. The more we invest in it, develop it, and implement it today, the better the chances that future generations will have the tools they need to thrive in 3400 and beyond.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3400 ?

That’s a great question that really gets you thinking about the scope of sustainable technology! Here’s how I’d approach the “where” of needing sustainable technology in 3400:

• Everywhere! Sustainable technology in 3400 would likely be integrated into every aspect of life, from the individual to the global scale. It wouldn’t be confined to specific locations but rather woven into the fabric of society.

Here are some examples of where sustainable technology might be essential in 3400:

• Homes and Cities: Sustainable technology would be crucial for creating eco-friendly homes and cities. This could involve things like self-sufficient energy systems, advanced water management, and green buildings that integrate with the natural environment.
• Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems would be essential for moving people and goods in an environmentally responsible way. This could involve things like electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and even flying vehicles powered by clean energy sources.
• Agriculture and Food Production: Sustainable technology would be needed to ensure food security and minimize the environmental impact of agriculture. This could involve things like vertical farms, precision agriculture, and lab-grown meat.
• Industry and Manufacturing: Sustainable technology would be essential for creating environmentally friendly industrial processes. This could involve things like closed-loop manufacturing systems, the use of sustainable materials, and carbon capture and storage technologies.
• Energy Production and Distribution: Sustainable technology would be needed to generate and distribute energy in a clean and efficient way. This could involve things like advanced renewable energy sources, smart grids, and energy storage solutions.
• Environmental Monitoring and Protection: Sustainable technology would be crucial for monitoring the health of the planet and protecting the environment. This could involve things like global sensor networks, AI-powered environmental management systems, and technologies for cleaning up pollution.

Beyond Earth?

It’s also worth considering that by 3400, humanity might have expanded beyond Earth. If that’s the case, sustainable technology would be even more critical for establishing and maintaining off-world settlements. This could involve things like closed-loop life support systems, in-situ resource utilization (ISRU), and space-based solar power.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3400 would be needed wherever human activity takes place. It would be an essential tool for creating a thriving and sustainable future for all.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3400 ?

The “how” of sustainable technology in 3400 is less about the specific technologies (which are impossible to predict) and more about the approach and mindset that would be necessary to develop and implement them. Here’s a breakdown:

• A Foundation of Scientific Understanding: Sustainable technology in 3400 would be built upon a deep and comprehensive understanding of natural systems, material science, energy, and the interconnectedness of everything. This implies centuries of continued scientific advancement.
• Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion requires international cooperation. In 3400, we’d likely see highly developed systems for sharing knowledge, research, and technological advancements across the globe.
• Systems Thinking: Sustainable technology isn’t just about individual gadgets; it’s about understanding how different systems interact. In 3400, technologies would likely be designed with a holistic perspective, considering their impact on the entire planet.
• Emphasis on Efficiency and Resource Optimization: The core principle of sustainability is doing more with less. In 3400, technologies would likely be incredibly efficient, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization. This might involve closed-loop systems where resources are continuously recycled and reused.
• Biomimicry and Nature-Inspired Design: Nature has evolved incredibly efficient and resilient systems over billions of years. In 3400, we might see extensive use of biomimicry, where technologies are designed to mimic natural processes.
• Adaptive and Resilient Systems: The world of 3400 might still face unforeseen challenges. Sustainable technologies would need to be adaptive and resilient, able to adjust to changing conditions and withstand disruptions.
• Ethical Considerations and Social Responsibility: Technological advancements must be guided by ethical principles. In 3400, it would be crucial to ensure that sustainable technologies are used in a way that benefits all of humanity and protects the environment.
• Continuous Innovation and Improvement: Sustainable technology is not a destination but a journey. In 3400, continuous innovation and improvement would be essential for addressing emerging challenges and ensuring a sustainable future.

In essence: The “how” of sustainable technology in 3400 is about a combination of advanced scientific understanding, global collaboration, systems thinking, resource efficiency, biomimicry, resilience, ethical considerations, and a commitment to continuous improvement. It’s less about what the technologies are and more about how we approach developing and using them.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3400 ?

It’s impossible to create a real case study of sustainable technology in 3400 because we can’t know what it will be like. However, we can create a hypothetical case study to illustrate the kind of thinking and approach that might be involved.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 3400

Background: By 3400, centuries of human impact have severely degraded the Amazon rainforest. Climate change, deforestation, and unsustainable resource extraction have decimated its biodiversity and disrupted its vital role in global ecosystems. Recognizing the Amazon’s importance, a global initiative is launched to revitalize the rainforest using advanced sustainable technologies.

The Challenge: The revitalization project faces numerous challenges:

• Restoring complex and interconnected ecosystems.
• Reversing the effects of climate change.
• Balancing human needs with environmental protection.
• Ensuring the long-term sustainability of the revitalized rainforest.

The Solution: The project utilizes a multi-faceted approach, integrating several advanced sustainable technologies:

• Bio-Integrated Sensor Networks: Nanoscale sensors are deployed throughout the rainforest to monitor ecosystem health in real-time. These sensors track everything from soil moisture and nutrient levels to biodiversity and carbon sequestration rates. AI algorithms analyze this data to identify areas needing intervention.
• Adaptive Reforestation Technologies: Drones and autonomous robots plant genetically diverse, climate-resilient tree species tailored to specific microclimates. These technologies also utilize advanced soil amendments and mycorrhizal fungi to accelerate forest regeneration.
• Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Geoengineering: Large-scale atmospheric carbon capture facilities remove excess CO2 from the atmosphere, mitigating the effects of climate change. Precisely targeted geoengineering techniques, such as stratospheric aerosol injection, are used sparingly to further cool the planet.
• Sustainable Resource Management Systems: Advanced technologies are developed to provide local communities with sustainable livelihoods, such as vertical farms for food production, advanced bio-materials for construction, and closed-loop recycling systems. These systems minimize the need to exploit the rainforest’s resources.
• Biodiversity Restoration and Genetic Engineering: Genetic engineering techniques are used to restore populations of endangered species and enhance their resilience to environmental stressors. Cryopreservation banks preserve the genetic diversity of the Amazon’s flora and fauna.

Results: Over several decades, the project achieves remarkable success. The Amazon rainforest begins to regenerate, biodiversity increases, and its vital role in regulating the global climate is restored. The project becomes a model for ecosystem restoration around the world.

Lessons Learned:

• The importance of a holistic and integrated approach to sustainable technology.
• The crucial role of real-time environmental monitoring and data analysis.
• The need for global collaboration and long-term commitment.
• The potential of advanced technologies to reverse environmental damage.
• The importance of balancing human needs with environmental protection.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how a combination of advanced sustainable technologies, coupled with a deep understanding of ecological systems and a commitment to global cooperation, could be used to address complex environmental challenges in the future. While the specific technologies are speculative, the underlying principles and approach are essential for creating a sustainable future.

COURTESY : Carnegie India

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3400 ?

White Paper: Envisioning Sustainable Technology in 3400

Abstract:

Predicting the specifics of sustainable technology in 3400 is inherently speculative. However, by examining current trends, potential future developments, and the fundamental principles of sustainability, we can construct a plausible vision of how technology might contribute to a thriving and balanced world centuries from now. This white paper explores potential characteristics of sustainable technology in 3400, focusing on key areas like energy, resource management, environmental monitoring, and human-technology integration. It also discusses the ethical considerations and societal shifts necessary to achieve such a future.

1. Introduction:

The concept of “sustainable technology” implies meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. In 3400, this principle will likely be even more critical as humanity potentially faces the long-term consequences of past actions and the challenges of a changing planet. This paper explores possible features of sustainable technology in 3400, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties while grounding the discussion in current trajectories and fundamental sustainability principles.  

2. Energy:

By 3400, reliance on fossil fuels will hopefully be a distant memory. Several potential energy sources could dominate:

• Advanced Fusion: Controlled nuclear fusion, if perfected, could provide clean, abundant energy.
• Space-Based Solar Power: Harvesting solar energy in space and beaming it to Earth could offer a continuous and inexhaustible supply.
• Geothermal Energy: Enhanced geothermal systems could tap into the Earth’s heat for a reliable energy source.
• Hybrid Systems: A combination of renewable sources, including advanced wind, solar, and hydro, coupled with sophisticated energy storage solutions, could form a resilient and decentralized energy grid.

3. Resource Management:

In a sustainable future, resource scarcity will need to be addressed through:

• Closed-Loop Systems: Near-total recycling and reuse of materials will be essential. Advanced material science and nanotechnology could enable the creation of products designed for disassembly and material recovery.
• Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to create materials and products could offer a sustainable alternative to traditional manufacturing.
• In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): If humanity has expanded beyond Earth, ISRU will be crucial for utilizing resources available on other planets and celestial bodies.

4. Environmental Monitoring and Restoration:

• Global Sensor Network: A vast network of interconnected sensors could monitor the planet’s health in real time, providing data on everything from climate patterns to biodiversity.
• AI-Driven Environmental Management: Artificial intelligence could analyze this data to predict and mitigate environmental challenges, optimize resource management, and guide restoration efforts.
• Advanced Ecosystem Restoration Technologies: Nanotechnology, genetic engineering, and other advanced tools could be used to restore damaged ecosystems and enhance their resilience.

5. Human-Technology Integration:

Sustainable technology in 3400 might involve a greater integration of technology with the human body and mind:

• Personalized Environmental Monitoring: Wearable devices could provide individuals with real-time information about their environment and their impact on it.
• Brain-Computer Interfaces: BCIs could facilitate more intuitive and efficient interaction with technology, potentially leading to more sustainable practices.
• Enhanced Human Capabilities: Technology could enhance human abilities in ways that promote sustainability, such as improved cognitive function for problem-solving or enhanced physical abilities for working in challenging environments.

6. Ethical Considerations and Societal Shifts:

Achieving a sustainable future by 3400 will require significant ethical considerations and societal shifts:

• Global Cooperation: International collaboration will be essential for developing and implementing sustainable technologies on a global scale.
• Equitable Access: Ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technology are accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status, will be crucial.
• Responsible Innovation: Technological development must be guided by ethical principles and a deep understanding of potential consequences.
• Education and Awareness: Widespread education and awareness about sustainability will be essential for fostering a culture of environmental responsibility.

7. Conclusion:

While the specifics of sustainable technology in 3400 remain unknown, this white paper has explored some plausible possibilities based on current trends and fundamental sustainability principles. Achieving this vision will require a concerted effort from individuals, governments, and industries around the world. By prioritizing research, innovation, and ethical considerations, we can pave the way for a future where technology helps humanity thrive in harmony with the planet.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3400 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine how sustainable technology might revolutionize industries in 3400! Here are some potential applications:

1. Manufacturing:

• Closed-Loop Production: Factories of the future could operate on closed-loop systems where resources are continuously recycled and reused. Advanced material science and nanotechnology would enable the creation of products designed for disassembly and material recovery.
• Biomanufacturing: Industries might utilize biological processes to create materials and products, offering a sustainable alternative to traditional manufacturing. Imagine growing furniture or building materials using engineered organisms!
• Personalized Manufacturing: 3D printing and other additive manufacturing technologies could allow for highly personalized and localized production, reducing waste and transportation costs.

2. Energy:

• Decentralized Energy Grids: Industries might rely on a combination of renewable energy sources, such as advanced solar, wind, and geothermal, coupled with sophisticated energy storage solutions. This could lead to more resilient and localized energy grids.
• Energy-Efficient Processes: Advanced technologies could significantly improve energy efficiency in industrial processes, minimizing energy consumption and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
• Carbon Capture and Utilization: Industries could utilize advanced carbon capture technologies to capture CO2 emissions from industrial processes and convert them into useful products, such as fuels or building materials.

3. Agriculture and Food Production:

• Vertical Farms: Urban centers might have large-scale vertical farms that utilize hydroponics and aeroponics to produce food efficiently and sustainably. These farms could be integrated into buildings and utilize recycled water and nutrients.
• Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI could be used to optimize agricultural practices, reducing water and fertilizer use while maximizing yields.
• Sustainable Packaging: Food and other products could be packaged in biodegradable or compostable materials, minimizing waste and pollution.

4. Resource Extraction:

• Sustainable Mining: Advanced technologies could be used to extract resources from the Earth in a more sustainable way, minimizing environmental impact and maximizing resource recovery.
• Asteroid Mining: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth, asteroid mining could provide access to valuable resources without damaging terrestrial ecosystems.

5. Transportation:

• Sustainable Transportation Systems: Industries might rely on electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and other sustainable transportation systems to move goods and people.
• Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles could optimize transportation routes and reduce fuel consumption.

6. Waste Management:

• Advanced Recycling and Waste Processing: Industries could utilize advanced technologies to recycle and process waste, minimizing landfill use and recovering valuable resources.
• Waste-to-Energy: Waste materials could be converted into energy, providing a sustainable source of power.

7. Construction:

• Green Buildings: Buildings could be designed to be energy-efficient, utilize sustainable materials, and integrate with the natural environment.
• Modular Construction: Buildings could be constructed using modular components that can be easily assembled and disassembled, reducing waste and improving resource efficiency.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could transform industries in 3400. The possibilities are vast, and the specific technologies that emerge will depend on the choices we make today. By prioritizing research, innovation, and ethical considerations, we can pave the way for a future where industries operate in a way that is both economically viable and environmentally responsible.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3400 ?

It’s true that predicting the exact research and development paths for sustainable technology in 3400 is impossible. However, we can extrapolate from current trends and identify key areas that are likely to be crucial for achieving a sustainable future. Here are some potential R&D focuses:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

• Self-Healing Materials: Developing materials that can repair themselves, extending the lifespan of products and reducing waste.
• Biodegradable and Compostable Materials: Creating materials that break down naturally, minimizing pollution and returning valuable nutrients to the environment.
• Lightweight and High-Strength Materials: Developing materials that are both strong and lightweight, improving energy efficiency in transportation and construction.
• Adaptive Materials: Creating materials that can change their properties in response to environmental stimuli, such as temperature or light, enabling more efficient and responsive systems.

2. Energy:

• Fusion Energy: Continued research into fusion energy, aiming to achieve a stable and efficient fusion reactor that can provide clean and abundant energy.
• Advanced Solar Technologies: Developing more efficient and cost-effective solar cells, including perovskite solar cells and space-based solar power systems.
• Geothermal Energy: Expanding research into enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) to tap into the Earth’s heat for a reliable energy source.
• Energy Storage: Developing more efficient and affordable energy storage solutions, such as advanced batteries, pumped hydro storage, and thermal energy storage.

3. Environmental Science and Ecology:

• Ecosystem Restoration: Researching and developing techniques for restoring damaged ecosystems, such as forests, coral reefs, and wetlands.
• Climate Change Mitigation: Investigating and developing technologies for removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and mitigating the effects of climate change.
• Biodiversity Conservation: Studying and protecting biodiversity, including genetic engineering techniques to enhance the resilience of endangered species.
• Environmental Monitoring: Developing advanced sensor networks and AI systems to monitor the health of the planet in real-time.

4. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing:

• Synthetic Biology: Utilizing synthetic biology to engineer organisms that can produce valuable materials, fuels, and pharmaceuticals.
• Biomanufacturing: Developing biological processes for creating materials and products, offering a sustainable alternative to traditional manufacturing.
• Sustainable Agriculture: Researching and developing sustainable agricultural practices, such as precision agriculture and vertical farming, to ensure food security.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning:

• AI for Sustainability: Applying AI and machine learning to optimize energy use, improve waste management, and support sustainable agriculture.
• Predictive Modeling: Using AI to model and predict environmental changes, enabling proactive responses to challenges like climate change.
• Autonomous Systems: Developing autonomous robots and drones for environmental monitoring, resource management, and ecosystem restoration.

6. Social Sciences and Ethics:

• Sustainable Behavior: Studying human behavior and developing strategies to promote sustainable practices.
• Environmental Justice: Addressing issues of environmental justice and ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technology are shared equitably.
• Ethical Considerations: Examining the ethical implications of advanced technologies and developing guidelines for their responsible use.

It’s important to remember that these areas of research are interconnected. Progress in one area can often lead to breakthroughs in others. By fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, and social scientists, we can accelerate the development of sustainable technologies and create a brighter future for all.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Reference

^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.

^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.

^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.

^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.

^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.

^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.

^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.

^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.

^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.

^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.

^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.

^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.

^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher

^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)

^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.

^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.

^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.

^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.

^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.

^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972

^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.

^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.

^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.

^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.

^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.

^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)

^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.

^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals

^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.

^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.

^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.

^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.

^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.

^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.

^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.

^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.

^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.

^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.

^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.

^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}

^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine

^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.

^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB

^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.

^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.

^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.

^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.

^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.

^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.

^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.

^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.

^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.

^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.

^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.

^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.

^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.

^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.

^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.

^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.

^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.

^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.