Sustainable Technology of 3380

81 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3380 ?

Sustainable technology encompasses a wide range of innovations aimed at minimizing environmental impact and promoting resource efficiency. Here are some key areas and examples:

Renewable Energy:

Solar Power: Harnessing energy from the sun through photovoltaic cells and concentrated solar power systems.
Wind Energy: Utilizing wind turbines to convert wind power into electricity.
Hydropower: Generating electricity from the energy of moving water.
Geothermal Energy: Tapping into the Earth’s heat for electricity generation and heating.
Biomass Energy: Using organic matter as fuel for energy production.

Energy Efficiency:

Smart Grids: Modernizing power grids to optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.
LED Lighting: Replacing traditional bulbs with energy-efficient LED technology.
Building Insulation: Improving insulation in buildings to reduce energy consumption for heating and cooling.
Smart Home Devices: Using technology to automate and optimize energy usage in homes.

Sustainable Transportation:

Electric Vehicles (EVs): Shifting away from fossil fuel-powered vehicles to electric cars, buses, and trucks.
Hybrid Vehicles: Combining electric motors with gasoline engines to improve fuel efficiency.
Public Transportation: Investing in efficient and accessible public transportation systems.
Cycling and Walking Infrastructure: Creating safe and convenient infrastructure for non-motorized transportation.

Waste Management:

Recycling Technologies: Developing innovative methods for recycling materials and reducing waste.
Composting: Turning organic waste into nutrient-rich compost for agriculture.
Waste-to-Energy: Converting waste into usable energy through incineration or other processes.

Agriculture and Food Systems:

Precision Agriculture: Using technology to optimize resource use in agriculture, such as water and fertilizers.
Sustainable Farming Practices: Adopting methods that minimize environmental impact and promote soil health.
Vertical Farming: Growing crops in vertically stacked layers to reduce land use and water consumption.

Water Management:

Water Conservation Technologies: Developing efficient irrigation systems and water-saving devices.
Water Treatment and Purification: Improving access to clean water through advanced treatment methods.
Desalination: Converting seawater into freshwater for regions with limited water resources.

Materials and Manufacturing:

Sustainable Materials: Using renewable and recycled materials in manufacturing processes.
Green Chemistry: Designing chemical products and processes that minimize environmental impact.
Circular Economy: Creating closed-loop systems where resources are reused and recycled.

Information and Communication Technology (ICT):

Cloud Computing: Optimizing data storage and processing to reduce energy consumption.
Green Data Centers: Designing data centers that minimize energy and water usage.
Sustainable Electronics: Producing electronic devices with recycled materials and energy-efficient components.

Other Areas:

Carbon Capture and Storage: Capturing carbon dioxide emissions from industrial sources and storing them underground.
Environmental Remediation: Developing technologies to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.
Sustainable Tourism: Promoting tourism practices that minimize environmental and social impact.

These are just a few examples of the many sustainable technologies that are being developed and implemented around the world. As we face increasing environmental challenges, the continued innovation and adoption of sustainable technologies will be crucial for creating a more sustainable future.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3380 ?

Unfortunately, I cannot provide specific details about sustainable technology in the year 3380. This is because:

Future Projections are Speculative: Predicting technological advancements over a millennium into the future is highly speculative. While we can extrapolate current trends and imagine potential breakthroughs, it’s impossible to know for certain what technologies will exist and how they will be used.
Limited Information: There is no reliable information or documented research on sustainable technology in the year 3380.

However, I can offer some general thoughts on what sustainable technology might look like in such a distant future, based on current trends and potential developments:

Highly Advanced Renewable Energy: It’s conceivable that by 3380, humanity will have harnessed renewable energy sources in ways we can’t even imagine today. Perhaps we’ll have mastered fusion power, or developed entirely new methods of capturing energy from the sun, wind, or other natural sources.
Closed-Loop Systems: In a truly sustainable future, resource utilization would likely be based on closed-loop systems. This means that materials are constantly recycled and reused, minimizing waste and the need for raw materials. Advanced technologies would be essential for achieving this circular economy.
Symbiotic Technology: Perhaps technology will have evolved to a point where it exists in a symbiotic relationship with the environment. This could involve technologies that actively restore ecosystems, clean pollution, or even help to regulate the Earth’s climate.
AI-Driven Sustainability: Artificial intelligence could play a crucial role in optimizing resource use and minimizing environmental impact. AI systems could manage energy grids, transportation networks, and even entire cities to ensure maximum efficiency and sustainability.
Space-Based Resources: By 3380, space exploration and colonization might be commonplace. This could lead to the utilization of resources from space, reducing the pressure on Earth’s limited resources.

It’s important to remember that these are just possibilities. The actual trajectory of technological development is unpredictable. However, the pursuit of sustainability will likely remain a driving force behind innovation, shaping the technologies of the future, even those far beyond our current comprehension.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3380 ?

While it’s impossible to know for certain who will “require” sustainable technology in 3380, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the likely needs of a future society:

Humanity as a Whole: In the long run, the primary “requirer” of sustainable technology will be humanity itself. If our species is to survive and thrive in the distant future, we will need to have developed and implemented technologies that allow us to live in harmony with the environment. This means minimizing our impact on the planet, conserving resources, and finding ways to live within the Earth’s carrying capacity.
Future Civilizations: It’s possible that by 3380, humanity will have expanded beyond Earth and established settlements on other planets or in space. These future civilizations would also require sustainable technologies to ensure their survival and independence. They might even need to develop technologies that allow them to adapt to and thrive in environments very different from Earth.
Ecosystems and the Planet: In a broader sense, the Earth’s ecosystems and the planet itself will “require” sustainable technology. If we continue to degrade the environment and deplete resources, the planet’s ability to support life will be compromised. Sustainable technologies will be essential for restoring damaged ecosystems, mitigating climate change, and preserving biodiversity.
Future Generations: Future generations will be the ultimate beneficiaries of sustainable technology. They will inherit the consequences of our actions (or inaction) today. By developing sustainable technologies now, we can ensure that future generations have access to the resources they need and can live in a healthy and thriving world.

It’s important to remember that the development and implementation of sustainable technology is not just a matter of technological innovation. It also requires social, economic, and political changes. To truly achieve a sustainable future, we will need to adopt new ways of thinking about our relationship with the environment and make fundamental changes in how we live and interact with the world around us.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3380 ?

This is a fascinating question! While we can’t pinpoint an exact date when sustainable technology will be required in 3380, we can explore the factors that might make it absolutely essential by then:

Resource Depletion: If humanity continues to consume resources at an unsustainable rate, by 3380 many essential resources could be severely depleted or exhausted. This would necessitate the development and implementation of technologies that rely on renewable resources, closed-loop systems, and highly efficient resource utilization.
Environmental Degradation: Climate change, pollution, and habitat destruction could reach critical levels by 3380, making it imperative to adopt technologies that can mitigate these problems and restore damaged ecosystems. This might involve advanced carbon capture and storage, environmental remediation technologies, and geoengineering solutions.
Population Growth: If the human population continues to grow, even with space colonization, the demands on Earth’s resources and ecosystems will increase. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for ensuring that everyone has access to food, water, energy, and other essential resources.
Technological Advancement: As technology continues to advance, we may develop a deeper understanding of complex systems and the interconnectedness of life on Earth. This could lead to the realization that sustainable practices are not just an ethical choice, but a fundamental requirement for our own survival and well-being.

It’s important to note that the need for sustainable technology is not something that will suddenly appear in 3380. It’s a need that is becoming increasingly urgent today. The sooner we develop and implement sustainable technologies, the better our chances of creating a healthy and thriving future for ourselves and generations to come.

Ultimately, the “when” of sustainable technology in 3380 depends on the choices we make today. If we act now to transition to a more sustainable way of life, we can ensure that future generations inherit a world where they can thrive.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3380 ?

This is a really interesting question that requires us to think about the potential needs and challenges of a society in 3380! Here are some places where sustainable technology might be absolutely crucial:

Earth’s Ecosystems: Even with significant advancements, Earth’s ecosystems will likely still need careful management and restoration. Sustainable technologies will be needed to:
- Clean up pollution: Advanced methods for removing pollutants from air, water, and soil.
- Restore habitats: Technologies to rebuild damaged ecosystems and protect biodiversity.
- Manage resources: Systems for monitoring and regulating the use of natural resources like water and forests.
Human Settlements: Whether they are on Earth or in space, human settlements will need to be designed and managed sustainably. This includes:
- Energy production: Renewable energy systems to power homes, industries, and transportation.
- Waste management: Closed-loop systems for recycling and reusing materials.
- Food production: Sustainable agriculture and food production methods, possibly including vertical farms or lab-grown food.
- Infrastructure: Building materials and construction techniques that are environmentally friendly and resource-efficient.
Space Exploration and Colonization: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 3380, sustainable technologies will be essential for:
- Resource extraction: Mining resources from asteroids or other planets in a way that minimizes environmental impact.
- Life support systems: Creating closed-loop systems for air, water, and food production in space habitats.
- Planetary engineering: Possibly even terraforming other planets to make them more habitable for humans.
Industry and Manufacturing: Sustainable technologies will be needed to transform industries and manufacturing processes, making them more environmentally friendly and resource-efficient. This could involve:
- Green chemistry: Designing chemical products and processes that minimize environmental impact.
- Circular economy: Creating closed-loop systems where resources are reused and recycled.
- Sustainable materials: Using renewable and recycled materials in manufacturing.

It’s important to remember that the “where” of sustainable technology in 3380 is not just about physical locations. It’s also about the interconnectedness of systems. Sustainable solutions will need to be integrated across all aspects of society, from energy production and transportation to agriculture and manufacturing.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 3380 will be needed wherever humans are living and interacting with the environment. It will be an essential part of ensuring a healthy and thriving future for humanity and the planet.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3380 ?

You’re asking about the methods by which sustainable technology might be required in 3380. This gets into the “how” of its implementation, which is fascinating to consider! Here are some possibilities:

Necessity Driven by Scarcity: If resources become critically scarce by 3380, sustainable technologies might be required simply out of necessity. Imagine a world where fossil fuels are completely depleted, water is extremely limited, or key minerals are exhausted. In such a scenario, societies would have no choice but to adopt sustainable solutions for energy, water management, materials, and food production.
Regulations and Policies: Governments or global organizations might implement strict regulations and policies to mandate the use of sustainable technologies. This could be driven by a need to address environmental crises, ensure resource security, or promote social equity. Such regulations could include:
- Emissions limits: Setting strict limits on greenhouse gas emissions for industries and transportation.
- Resource efficiency standards: Requiring products to meet certain standards for energy consumption, water usage, and material use.
- Waste reduction mandates: Implementing policies to minimize waste generation and promote recycling and reuse.
Economic Incentives: Sustainable technologies could become required through economic incentives, such as:
- Carbon taxes: Imposing taxes on activities that generate carbon emissions, making sustainable alternatives more economically competitive.
- Subsidies and grants: Providing financial support for the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.
- Market-based mechanisms: Creating markets for carbon credits or other environmental commodities, incentivizing companies to reduce their environmental impact.
Social and Cultural Shifts: Changes in social values and cultural norms could also lead to the requirement of sustainable technologies. If people become more aware of environmental issues and more committed to sustainable living, they might demand products and services that are environmentally friendly. This could drive companies to adopt sustainable practices to meet consumer demand.
Technological Advancements: Ironically, technological advancements themselves might make sustainable technologies required. As we develop more sophisticated technologies, we might gain a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of systems and the long-term consequences of our actions. This could lead to the realization that sustainable practices are not just an ethical choice, but a fundamental requirement for our own survival and well-being.

It’s likely that a combination of these factors would contribute to the requirement of sustainable technology in 3380. It would be a result of both necessity and conscious choices, driven by a need to address environmental challenges, ensure resource security, and create a more equitable and sustainable future.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3380 ?

It’s tough to give a specific case study for sustainable technology in 3380, as that’s far beyond our current understanding. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on trends and potential future needs. Here’s an example:

Case Study: The Great Lakes Restoration Project, 3380

Background: By the early 34th century, even with advancements, some regions of Earth faced ecological challenges. The Great Lakes, a vital freshwater resource, suffered from centuries of industrial impact and climate change. Pollution, invasive species, and altered water levels threatened its ecosystem and the communities relying on it.

The 3380 Initiative: A global consortium launched the Great Lakes Restoration Project, a multi-faceted effort using cutting-edge sustainable technology.

Key Technologies:

Nano-Purification Systems: Microscopic robots were deployed to break down pollutants at a molecular level, restoring water quality to pre-industrial levels.
Adaptive Ecosystem Management: AI-powered sensors monitored the lakes’ health in real-time. If imbalances were detected (e.g., algae blooms, invasive species), targeted interventions were deployed, like bio-engineered organisms to control invasive species without harming others.
Hydro-Cloning: Advanced techniques allowed for the “cloning” of ideal water conditions from historical data. This helped restore natural water flow and temperature patterns, vital for native species.
Symbiotic Infrastructure: Cities around the lakes were redesigned with “symbiotic infrastructure.” Buildings were covered in algae-based systems that cleaned air and produced biofuel. Water was recycled through living filtration systems, creating beautiful, functional green spaces.

Outcomes:

Ecological Revival: The Great Lakes ecosystem was revitalized. Native fish populations rebounded, water quality improved dramatically, and biodiversity flourished.
Economic Boom: Restored fisheries and tourism created jobs and revitalized local economies.
Resilient Communities: The symbiotic infrastructure made cities more self-sufficient and resilient to climate change impacts.
Global Model: The Great Lakes Restoration Project became a blueprint for similar efforts worldwide, demonstrating how sustainable technology could heal even heavily damaged ecosystems.

Lessons:

Long-term Vision: The project showed the importance of long-term thinking in sustainability. Investments made in 3380 yielded benefits for centuries to come.
Integration: Combining diverse technologies was key. Nano-purification alone wouldn’t have been enough; it needed to work with ecosystem management and infrastructure redesign.
Human-Nature Partnership: The project wasn’t just about fixing problems, but creating a new relationship where technology and nature worked together in harmony.

Important Note: This is just one possible scenario. The actual challenges and solutions in 3380 might be very different. But by thinking about these possibilities, we can start to imagine how sustainable technology might shape a better future.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3380 ?

It’s a fun thought experiment to imagine a white paper on sustainable technology from the perspective of someone in 3380! Here’s an attempt to create one, keeping in mind the limitations of our current knowledge:

Title: Symbiotic Futures: A Retrospective on Sustainable Technology, 3380

Abstract: This white paper examines the evolution of sustainable technology over the past millennium, focusing on the critical period from the 21st to the 34th centuries. It explores the challenges faced by early civilizations in mitigating environmental degradation and achieving resource security, and highlights the key technological breakthroughs that enabled humanity to transition towards a symbiotic relationship with the planet. The paper also discusses the ethical considerations and social transformations that accompanied this shift, emphasizing the importance of long-term vision and global cooperation in achieving a sustainable future.

1. Introduction

In 3380, we enjoy a world where technology and nature coexist in harmony. Our cities are integrated with living systems that provide clean air and water, our industries operate on closed-loop principles, and our energy comes from abundant renewable sources. This was not always the case. Centuries ago, our ancestors faced a critical juncture. Unsustainable consumption patterns, coupled with a rapidly changing climate, threatened the very foundations of human civilization. This white paper looks back at that pivotal era and examines the technological, social, and ethical choices that led us to where we are today.

2. The Sustainability Crisis (21st-24th Centuries)

The early 21st century was marked by a growing awareness of the environmental crisis. Climate change, resource depletion, and pollution were wreaking havoc on ecosystems and human societies. While some efforts were made to promote sustainable practices, progress was slow and uneven. It wasn’t until the mid-23rd century that a global consensus emerged on the need for radical change. This was driven by a combination of factors:

Scientific Evidence: Mounting evidence of the severity of environmental degradation.
Economic Pressures: The rising costs of resource scarcity and environmental damage.
Social Movements: Growing public awareness and demand for sustainable solutions.

3. Technological Transformations (24th-30th Centuries)

The transition to a sustainable future was driven by a series of key technological breakthroughs:

Advanced Renewable Energy: Fusion power and space-based solar energy provided abundant clean energy.
Nano-Manufacturing: Enabled the creation of materials with unprecedented properties, facilitating closed-loop recycling and resource efficiency.
AI-Driven Optimization: Artificial intelligence systems managed complex networks, optimizing energy use, resource allocation, and environmental monitoring.
Bio-Integrated Technology: Blurring the lines between technology and nature, creating systems that mimic and enhance natural processes.

4. Ethical and Social Dimensions

The technological transformations were accompanied by profound ethical and social shifts:

Planetary Consciousness: A growing awareness of the interconnectedness of all life and the need to act as stewards of the planet.
Global Cooperation: Increased collaboration between nations and cultures to address shared environmental challenges.
Sustainable Lifestyles: Changes in consumption patterns and social values, prioritizing well-being over material possessions.

5. Lessons Learned

The journey towards a sustainable future taught us several important lessons:

Long-term Vision: Sustainable solutions require thinking beyond immediate needs and considering the impact on future generations.
Systems Thinking: Understanding the complex interactions between human systems and the environment is crucial for effective solutions.
Collaboration: Global cooperation and knowledge sharing are essential for tackling shared challenges.

6. Conclusion

The sustainable technology of 3380 is not just about specific technologies, but about a fundamental shift in our relationship with the planet. It’s about recognizing our place within the web of life and acting in ways that ensure a thriving future for all.

Note: This is just a glimpse of what a white paper on sustainable technology in 3380 might look like. The actual content would likely be far more detailed and nuanced, reflecting the accumulated knowledge and experience of a civilization that has successfully navigated the challenges of sustainability.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3380 ?

Let’s speculate on some industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3380, building on current trends and imagining how far things might advance:

1. Closed-Loop Manufacturing:

Self-Replicating Factories: Imagine factories that can produce their own replacement parts and even expand their own capacity using locally sourced, recycled materials. This would minimize waste and drastically reduce the need for transporting materials.
Molecular Recycling: Advanced nanotechnology could allow for the breakdown of any material into its basic molecular components and then reassemble them into new products. This would create a truly circular economy where virtually nothing is wasted.
Personalized Manufacturing: 3D printing and other additive manufacturing technologies could be so advanced that individuals can create almost anything they need at home or in small, local factories, reducing the need for mass production and long supply chains.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

Global Energy Grid: A vast, interconnected network powered by a combination of advanced renewable sources (like space-based solar, fusion, or geothermal) could provide clean energy to every corner of the planet.
Localized Energy Generation: Homes and businesses could have their own small-scale, highly efficient energy generators based on technologies we can’t even imagine today, further decentralizing energy production.
Wireless Energy Transfer: Perhaps energy can be transmitted wirelessly over long distances, eliminating the need for power lines and making it easier to access remote areas.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

Sustainable Mining: Mining operations on Earth or even on other planets could be carried out with minimal environmental impact, using autonomous robots and advanced techniques to extract resources without destroying ecosystems.
Asteroid Mining: By 3380, mining asteroids and other celestial bodies could be commonplace, providing access to rare minerals and other resources without depleting Earth’s reserves.
Ocean Mining: If done sustainably, mining resources from the ocean floor could be another way to access valuable materials without harming marine ecosystems.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farms: Massive, automated vertical farms located in urban centers could produce fresh, nutritious food year-round, reducing the need for long-distance transportation and minimizing the use of land and water.
Lab-Grown Food: Cultured meat and other lab-grown food products could become indistinguishable from traditional foods, reducing the environmental impact of animal agriculture.
Personalized Nutrition: Advanced sensors and AI could analyze an individual’s needs and create personalized food products tailored to their specific dietary requirements.

5. Transportation:

Hyperloop Networks: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops could connect cities and regions, allowing for rapid and efficient movement of people and goods.
Flying Vehicles: Personal flying vehicles could be commonplace, making transportation faster and more convenient, while advanced air traffic management systems would ensure safety and efficiency.
Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving cars and other autonomous vehicles could become the norm, reducing traffic congestion and accidents.

6. Construction and Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be made from materials that can repair themselves, reducing the need for maintenance and extending their lifespan.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Infrastructure systems could be designed to adapt to changing environmental conditions, such as rising sea levels or extreme weather events.
Bio-Integrated Architecture: Buildings could be designed to integrate with nature, incorporating living systems that provide clean air, water, and energy.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology might be applied in industry in 3380. The possibilities are vast, and it’s exciting to imagine how far we might come in a thousand years.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3380 ?

It’s exciting to imagine the kind of research and development that might be happening around sustainable technology in 3380! Here are some potential areas of focus, building on current scientific trends and imagining how far they might advance:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

Self-Healing and Adaptive Materials: Imagine materials that can repair themselves when damaged, or even adapt their properties in response to changing conditions. This could revolutionize construction, manufacturing, and transportation, making infrastructure more resilient and resource-efficient.
Bio-Integrated Materials: Scientists might be able to create materials that seamlessly integrate with living systems, blurring the lines between technology and nature. This could lead to self-healing buildings, living filtration systems, and even materials that can be grown or engineered biologically.
Exotic Matter: Perhaps by 3380, we will have a deeper understanding of exotic forms of matter and be able to harness their unique properties for sustainable applications. This could involve manipulating materials at the quantum level to achieve unprecedented energy efficiency or create entirely new forms of energy storage.

2. Energy Research:

Fusion Energy Mastery: Fusion power, which mimics the energy production of the sun, could finally become a reality. This would provide a clean, abundant, and virtually limitless source of energy.
Space-Based Solar Power: Huge solar arrays in space could capture sunlight without interruption and beam it down to Earth, providing a constant source of renewable energy.
Zero-Point Energy: Perhaps by 3380, we will have learned how to tap into zero-point energy, a theoretical energy source that exists in the vacuum of space. This would be a truly revolutionary breakthrough, providing access to an inexhaustible source of clean energy.

3. Biotechnology and Bioengineering:

Synthetic Biology: Scientists might be able to design and engineer new biological systems with specific functions, such as microorganisms that can break down pollutants, produce biofuels, or even help to regulate the Earth’s climate.
Advanced Agriculture: Bioengineering could be used to create crops that are more resilient to climate change, require less water and fertilizer, and have higher nutritional value. This could help to ensure food security for a growing population.
Ecosystem Restoration: Biotechnology could be used to restore damaged ecosystems, clean up pollution, and even help to revive extinct species.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Complex Systems:

AI-Driven Optimization: AI systems could be used to manage complex networks, such as energy grids, transportation systems, and even entire cities, to maximize efficiency and sustainability.
Predictive Modeling: Advanced AI could be used to model and predict the impacts of human activities on the environment, allowing us to make more informed decisions about resource use and development.
Global Ecosystem Monitoring: AI-powered sensor networks could monitor the health of the planet’s ecosystems in real-time, providing early warnings of environmental problems and enabling rapid responses.

5. Space Exploration and Resource Utilization:

Asteroid Mining: By 3380, mining asteroids and other celestial bodies could be a well-established practice, providing access to rare minerals and other resources without depleting Earth’s reserves.
Space-Based Manufacturing: Perhaps we will have developed the technology to manufacture products in space, using resources from other planets or asteroids. This could reduce the need to transport materials from Earth and minimize the environmental impact of manufacturing.
Terraforming: In the very long term, perhaps we will even have the capability to terraform other planets, making them more habitable for humans and other life forms.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual direction of research and development in sustainable technology in 3380 will depend on many factors, including scientific breakthroughs, economic conditions, and social priorities. But by thinking about these possibilities, we can start to imagine the exciting and transformative potential of sustainable technology in the distant future.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Reference

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.