Sustainable Technology of 3360

Sustainable Technology of 3360 ?

Sustainable technology encompasses innovations that consider the environment and promote economic and social progress. These technologies aim to minimize environmental risks and create sustainable products.

Here are some examples of sustainable technologies:

• Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
• Energy Efficiency: LED lighting, smart grids, and improved insulation decrease energy consumption.
• Sustainable Agriculture: Techniques like crop rotation and precision farming reduce environmental impact.
• Green Building: Eco-friendly materials and energy-efficient designs minimize the environmental footprint of buildings.
• Waste Management: Recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy systems reduce landfill waste.
• Electric Vehicles: EVs and other alternative transportation reduce emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.
• Water Conservation: Technologies like drip irrigation and rainwater harvesting conserve water resources.

These are just a few examples, and the field of sustainable technology is constantly evolving with new innovations.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3360 ?

Unfortunately, “3360” doesn’t have a widely recognized meaning in the context of sustainable technology. It’s possible that:

• It’s a specific code or model number: Some companies might use such numbers for their internal projects or products related to sustainability.
• It’s a reference to a specific year: Perhaps it refers to sustainable technologies envisioned or developed in the year 3360, though this is far into the future.
• It’s a typo or a misunderstanding: It’s possible there’s been a slight error in the number, or it’s being used in a context I’m not familiar with.

If you can provide more context about where you encountered this term, I might be able to give you a more specific answer.

In the meantime, I can offer some general information about the future of sustainable technology:

• Continued advancements in renewable energy: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources will likely become even more efficient and cost-effective.
• Increased focus on circular economy: Technologies that enable reuse, recycling, and waste reduction will become more prevalent.
• Integration of AI and data analytics: These technologies will be used to optimize energy consumption, resource management, and other aspects of sustainability.
• Development of new materials: Sustainable materials with lower environmental impact will be developed and used in various applications.
• Emphasis on social equity: Sustainable technologies will be designed to address social inequalities and promote inclusive development.

Overall, the future of sustainable technology looks promising, with continuous innovation and a growing focus on environmental and social responsibility.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3360 ?

It seems you’re interested in who will need sustainable technology in the distant future! While it’s hard to predict the exact needs of the year 3360, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and challenges.

In short, everyone will likely need sustainable technology in 3360. Here’s why:

• Depleting Resources: If we continue on our current path, many of Earth’s resources will become scarce. Sustainable technology will be crucial for providing energy, food, and materials for future generations.
• Climate Change: The effects of climate change are likely to worsen in the coming centuries. Sustainable technology will be essential for mitigating these effects and adapting to a changing environment.
• Population Growth: The global population is expected to continue growing. Sustainable technology will be needed to ensure that everyone has access to basic necessities and a decent quality of life.
• Technological Advancement: Technology will likely continue to advance at a rapid pace. Sustainable technology will be needed to ensure that these advancements are used in a way that benefits humanity and the planet.

Here are some specific groups that will likely be particularly reliant on sustainable technology:

• Governments: Governments will need to invest in and promote sustainable technology to meet the needs of their citizens and protect the environment.
• Businesses: Businesses will need to adopt sustainable practices to remain competitive and meet the demands of consumers who are increasingly concerned about sustainability.
• Individuals: Individuals will need to make sustainable choices in their daily lives, such as using renewable energy, conserving water, and reducing waste.

In conclusion, sustainable technology will be essential for the survival and well-being of humanity in 3360 and beyond. It will require a collective effort from governments, businesses, and individuals to develop and implement these technologies.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about solving environmental problems. It’s also about creating a more just and equitable world for everyone. By investing in sustainable technology, we can create a future where everyone has the opportunity to thrive.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3360 ?

It’s tricky to pinpoint an exact date when sustainable technology will be required in 3360. However, we can think about it in terms of necessity and increasing importance:

• Already Required in Many Ways: In a sense, sustainable technology is already required. Many industries face regulations on emissions, waste, and resource use. Consumers increasingly demand eco-friendly products. So, the need is here.
• Growing Urgency: As resources dwindle and climate change impacts worsen, the need for sustainable solutions will become more urgent. By 3360, it’s likely that many unsustainable practices will be completely unviable.
• Not a Single Date: It won’t be a case of “on January 1st, 3360, everyone must use sustainable tech”. It will be a gradual shift, with increasing pressure and incentives to adopt sustainable practices.

Think of it like this:

• Now: It’s smart to be sustainable, and there are benefits.
• Near Future: It will be increasingly necessary to avoid penalties and stay competitive.
• Distant Future (like 3360): It will likely be the only way to survive and thrive.

Why so far in the future?

• Change Takes Time: Shifting entire industries and infrastructure takes decades, even centuries.
• Unpredictability: We can’t know exactly how technology will evolve or how severe environmental challenges will become.

The key takeaway: The need for sustainable technology is now. The further we look into the future, the more critical it becomes. By 3360, it will likely be an absolute necessity for human civilization to continue.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3360 ?

You’re asking a really interesting question that gets at the heart of how we think about the future! It’s not just when sustainable technology will be needed, but where it will be essential.

While it’s impossible to give a precise list of locations in 3360, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and challenges:

Everywhere on Earth:

• Urban Centers: Cities will likely be even more densely populated, requiring sustainable solutions for energy, transportation, waste management, and resource use.
• Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, water management, and resource extraction will be crucial for food production and maintaining ecosystems.
• Extreme Environments: As climate change progresses, sustainable technologies will be needed to make previously uninhabitable areas habitable or to help communities adapt to changing conditions (e.g., rising sea levels, extreme heat).

Beyond Earth:

• Space: If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be essential for space travel, resource utilization on other planets, and creating self-sustaining colonies.

Specific Examples:

• Coastal Regions: Sustainable infrastructure and coastal management will be crucial to protect against rising sea levels and extreme weather events.
• Arid and Water-Stressed Regions: Sustainable water management technologies, such as desalination and efficient irrigation, will be essential for survival.
• Industrial Areas: Sustainable manufacturing processes, waste management, and pollution control will be necessary to minimize environmental impact.

Key Considerations:

• Interconnectedness: Sustainable technology will need to be integrated across different sectors and regions. For example, sustainable agriculture will depend on sustainable energy and water management.
• Equity: Sustainable technology should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.
• Adaptability: Sustainable technology should be adaptable to changing conditions and evolving needs.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3360 will be required wherever humans live and interact with the environment. It will be a fundamental part of how we survive and thrive, both on Earth and potentially beyond.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3360 ?

You’re asking about the how – how sustainable technology will be implemented and integrated into society by 3360. While we can’t predict the exact technological landscape, we can explore some likely approaches based on current trends and future needs:

1. Integration and Systemic Change:

• Smart Infrastructure: Cities will likely be highly interconnected and optimized using smart grids, sensor networks, and AI to manage resources efficiently. Think of it as a city that constantly learns and adapts to minimize waste and maximize sustainability.
• Circular Economy: “Waste” as we know it might be largely eliminated. Products will be designed for disassembly, reuse, and recycling, creating closed-loop systems.
• Decentralized Systems: Energy generation, water management, and even food production might be more localized and distributed, increasing resilience and reducing reliance on large, centralized systems.

2. Technological Advancements:

• Advanced Materials: Sustainable materials with unique properties (e.g., self-healing, biodegradable, super-efficient) will likely be commonplace, reducing reliance on scarce resources.
• Biotechnology and Nanotechnology: These fields could offer solutions for sustainable agriculture, bioremediation, and even manufacturing.
• Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI will play a crucial role in optimizing complex systems, from energy grids to transportation networks, to minimize environmental impact.

3. Societal and Behavioral Shifts:

• Sustainable Lifestyles: Cultural norms will likely shift towards more sustainable consumption patterns, with an emphasis on sharing, repairing, and minimizing waste.
• Education and Awareness: A deep understanding of sustainability principles will be integrated into education at all levels, empowering individuals to make informed choices.
• Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require unprecedented international cooperation and the sharing of sustainable technologies.

4. Policy and Governance:

• Incentives and Regulations: Governments will likely play a key role in promoting sustainable technology through policies that incentivize sustainable practices and penalize unsustainable ones.
• International Agreements: Global agreements will be needed to address transboundary environmental issues and ensure equitable access to sustainable technologies.

5. Continuous Innovation:

• Research and Development: Continued investment in research and development will be crucial for developing new sustainable technologies and improving existing ones.
• Adaptability and Resilience: Sustainable systems will need to be designed to adapt to changing conditions, such as climate change impacts and resource availability.

In summary, the “how” of sustainable technology in 3360 will likely involve a combination of technological advancements, systemic changes, societal shifts, and effective governance. It will require a holistic approach that considers the interconnectedness of environmental, social, and economic systems.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3360 ?

It’s impossible to create a true case study of sustainable technology in 3360 because we can’t know what the future holds. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and project them forward. This allows us to explore potential scenarios and the kinds of sustainable technologies that might be necessary.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Ganges River Basin, 3360

Context: By the early 34th century, climate change has significantly altered the Earth’s geography. The Ganges River basin, once a cradle of civilization, faced severe challenges including glacial melt impacting river flow, increased monsoonal flooding, and saltwater intrusion in the delta region. Traditional agriculture struggled, and water scarcity threatened millions.

The Solution: Integrated Sustainable Technologies

A multi-pronged approach, driven by global cooperation and advanced technology, was implemented:

• Glacier Stabilization and Water Management: Nanotechnology-based “glacier shields” were deployed to slow glacial melt and manage water release into the Ganges. Advanced weather prediction and AI-powered water distribution systems optimized irrigation and ensured equitable access to water.
• Regenerative Agriculture: Vertical farms and hydroponic systems, powered by renewable energy, were established in urban and peri-urban areas. Drought-resistant and salt-tolerant crops were developed using advanced biotechnology, reducing reliance on traditional agriculture and minimizing water usage. Precision agriculture, guided by AI and sensor networks, optimized resource use and minimized environmental impact.
• Ecosystem Restoration: Mangrove forests and wetlands were restored in the delta region to act as natural barriers against storm surges and saltwater intrusion. Bioremediation techniques were used to clean up polluted waterways and restore biodiversity.
• Sustainable Energy Infrastructure: A network of renewable energy sources, including solar, wind, and advanced geothermal, provided clean energy for the region. Smart grids managed energy distribution and minimized waste. Fusion power plants, a technology perfected in the 33rd century, provided a stable and abundant energy source.
• Circular Economy and Waste Management: Advanced recycling and resource recovery technologies transformed waste into valuable resources. Products were designed for durability, reuse, and eventual breakdown into their constituent materials, minimizing landfill waste.

Outcomes:

• Food Security: The integrated approach to agriculture ensured food security for the growing population, even in the face of climate change impacts.
• Water Security: Advanced water management systems guaranteed access to clean water for both human consumption and agriculture.
• Ecosystem Resilience: Restored ecosystems provided natural protection against extreme weather events and supported biodiversity.
• Economic Growth: The transition to a sustainable economy created new jobs and stimulated economic growth.
• Social Equity: Sustainable technologies were implemented in a way that addressed social inequalities and ensured equitable access to resources.

Lessons Learned:

• Integrated Approach: Addressing complex challenges like climate change and resource scarcity requires a holistic approach that integrates multiple sustainable technologies.
• Technological Innovation: Continued investment in research and development is crucial for developing new sustainable technologies and improving existing ones.
• Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges requires international cooperation and the sharing of knowledge and resources.
• Social and Ethical Considerations: Sustainable technologies must be implemented in a way that is equitable and just, and that considers the social and ethical implications of technological change.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technologies might be integrated to address complex challenges in the future. While the specifics are speculative, it highlights the importance of a long-term vision and a commitment to innovation in creating a sustainable future.

COURTESY : Carnegie India

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3360 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3360: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3360. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, by extrapolating current trends, considering potential challenges, and envisioning transformative advancements, we can paint a plausible picture of how sustainable technologies might shape human civilization and its relationship with the planet. This paper examines key areas like energy, resources, environment, society, and governance, highlighting the interconnectedness of these domains and emphasizing the critical role of continuous innovation and global cooperation.

1. Introduction:

The 34th century presents both immense challenges and unprecedented opportunities. Climate change, resource depletion, and a growing global population necessitate a fundamental shift towards sustainable practices. This paper posits that by 3360, sustainable technology will be deeply ingrained in every facet of human life, not merely as an alternative, but as the foundational paradigm upon which society functions.

2. Energy:

• Fusion Power Dominance: Fusion energy, a clean and virtually limitless source, will likely be the primary energy source. Advanced materials and containment technologies will have made fusion reactors efficient and economically viable.
• Decentralized Renewable Integration: While fusion provides baseload power, localized renewable sources like advanced solar, wind, and geothermal will be seamlessly integrated into smart grids, creating a resilient and adaptable energy ecosystem.
• Energy Storage Revolution: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions, potentially based on advanced battery technologies or entirely new paradigms, will enable the seamless integration of intermittent renewable sources and ensure energy availability on demand.

3. Resources:

• Circular Economy Implementation: The concept of “waste” will be largely obsolete. Closed-loop systems will be the norm, with materials designed for disassembly, reuse, and recycling. Advanced material science will create durable, biodegradable, and even self-healing materials.
• Resource Optimization through AI: AI-driven systems will manage resource allocation and usage across industries and sectors, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency. Predictive analytics will anticipate resource needs and optimize supply chains.
• Sustainable Resource Extraction: Where resource extraction is necessary, it will be conducted with minimal environmental impact, utilizing advanced technologies and adhering to strict sustainability protocols.

4. Environment:

• Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Geoengineering technologies, if deemed necessary and safe, might be used to manage global climate patterns. However, the primary focus will be on mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to the inevitable impacts of past climate change.
• Ecosystem Restoration and Preservation: Advanced ecological restoration techniques will be employed to revitalize damaged ecosystems and protect biodiversity. Sensor networks and AI will monitor ecosystem health and provide early warnings of potential threats.
• Pollution Remediation: Nanotechnology and biotechnology will offer solutions for cleaning up existing pollution and preventing future contamination. Advanced filtration and purification systems will ensure access to clean air and water.

5. Society:

• Sustainable Urban Development: Cities will be designed for walkability, public transportation, and resource efficiency. Vertical farms and green spaces will be integrated into urban environments, creating more livable and sustainable communities.
• Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems: Precision agriculture, vertical farming, and lab-grown meat will contribute to a sustainable and secure food supply. Food waste will be drastically reduced through efficient distribution and consumption patterns.
• Sustainable Consumption and Production: Societal values will shift towards sustainable consumption patterns, with an emphasis on durability, repairability, and sharing. Businesses will adopt circular economy models and prioritize sustainability throughout their operations.

6. Governance:

• Global Cooperation and Policy: International cooperation will be essential for addressing global challenges like climate change and resource management. Global agreements and policies will promote sustainable practices and ensure equitable access to resources and technologies.
• Sustainable Development Goals: The Sustainable Development Goals, or their future equivalents, will continue to guide global efforts towards a more sustainable future.
• Ethical Considerations: As technology advances, ethical considerations will become increasingly important. Frameworks will be needed to guide the development and deployment of sustainable technologies in a way that is just, equitable, and respects human rights.

7. Conclusion:

The vision presented in this white paper represents a potential future where sustainable technology is not just a set of tools, but a fundamental paradigm that shapes human civilization and its relationship with the planet. Achieving this future requires continuous innovation, global cooperation, and a commitment to ethical and sustainable practices. While challenges remain, the potential for a thriving and sustainable future is within reach. The journey towards 3360 requires action today.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3360 ?

You’re asking about how industries might operate in a truly sustainable way in the distant future! It’s a fascinating thought experiment. Here are some potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3360:

1. Manufacturing:

• Closed-Loop Production: Factories will likely operate on circular economy principles. Raw materials will be sourced sustainably, products will be designed for disassembly and reuse, and waste will be virtually eliminated.
• Advanced Materials: Industries will utilize advanced, sustainable materials with unique properties. Think self-healing composites, biodegradable plastics, or materials grown from biological sources.
• Personalized Manufacturing: 3D printing and other additive manufacturing technologies will enable on-demand and personalized production, reducing waste and optimizing resource use.
• AI-Powered Optimization: AI will manage and optimize entire production processes, from energy use to material flow, minimizing environmental impact and maximizing efficiency.

2. Energy:

• Fusion-Powered Industries: Fusion energy will likely be the primary power source for industries, providing clean and abundant energy for manufacturing, transportation, and other processes.
• Renewable Integration: Industries will seamlessly integrate localized renewable energy sources, like advanced solar and geothermal, into their operations, creating resilient and decentralized energy systems.
• Energy-Efficient Processes: Industrial processes will be redesigned and optimized for maximum energy efficiency, minimizing energy consumption and waste.

3. Resource Management:

• Sustainable Resource Extraction: Where resource extraction is necessary, it will be conducted with minimal environmental impact, using advanced technologies and adhering to strict sustainability protocols.
• Resource Recovery and Recycling: Industries will have advanced systems for recovering and recycling valuable materials from waste streams, creating closed-loop systems and reducing reliance on virgin resources.
• AI-Driven Resource Management: AI will manage resource allocation and usage across industries, optimizing supply chains and minimizing waste.

4. Transportation:

• Sustainable Transportation Systems: Industries will rely on sustainable transportation systems for moving goods and materials, such as electric vehicles, advanced rail systems, and potentially even more futuristic transportation technologies.
• Logistics Optimization: AI will optimize logistics and supply chains, minimizing transportation distances and fuel consumption.

5. Agriculture and Food Production:

• Vertical Farming and Controlled Environments: Industries will utilize vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture to produce food sustainably in urban and peri-urban areas, reducing reliance on traditional agriculture and minimizing environmental impact.
• Sustainable Aquaculture: Sustainable aquaculture practices will ensure a healthy and sustainable seafood supply.
• Precision Agriculture: Precision agriculture technologies, guided by AI and sensor networks, will optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact in food production.

6. Construction:

• Sustainable Building Materials: Industries will utilize sustainable building materials, such as recycled materials, bio-based materials, and advanced composites, to construct energy-efficient and environmentally friendly buildings.
• Modular and Prefabricated Construction: Modular and prefabricated construction methods will reduce waste and improve efficiency in the building process.

7. Waste Management:

• Zero-Waste Industries: Industries will strive for zero-waste operations, with advanced recycling and resource recovery technologies transforming waste into valuable resources.
• Waste-to-Energy: Waste materials that cannot be recycled will be used to generate energy, further reducing environmental impact.

Key Considerations:

• Interconnectedness: These industrial applications will be interconnected and integrated, creating a holistic and sustainable industrial ecosystem.
• Continuous Innovation: Continuous research and development will be crucial for developing new sustainable technologies and improving existing ones.
• Global Cooperation: Global cooperation and knowledge sharing will be essential for accelerating the transition to sustainable industries.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential future of sustainable industries. The actual technologies and applications that emerge in 3360 will depend on a variety of factors, including technological advancements, societal values, and global events. However, the principles of sustainability—environmental protection, resource efficiency, and social equity—will likely be at the core of all industrial activities.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3360 ?

Research and development (R&D) into sustainable technology for 3360 is a fascinating concept, even if it’s largely speculative. Here’s how we might approach it, keeping in mind the long timescale:

1. Fundamental Science & Exploration:

• Advanced Materials: Research into novel materials with unique properties will be crucial. This could include:
  • Self-healing materials: To extend the lifespan of infrastructure and products.
  • Biodegradable super-materials: That break down naturally after use.
  • Energy-harvesting materials: To power devices and systems from ambient sources.
• Energy Generation:
  • Fusion Energy: Continued research into fusion power, aiming for efficient and cost-effective reactors.
  • Exotic Energy Sources: Exploring less conventional sources like zero-point energy or harnessing energy from space.
• Biotechnology & Nanotechnology:
  • Synthetic Biology: Designing microorganisms for bioremediation, biofuel production, or even manufacturing.
  • Nanomaterials: Developing nanomaterials for applications in energy storage, water purification, and environmental remediation.
• Understanding Complex Systems:
  • Earth System Science: Studying the Earth’s climate, ecosystems, and resource cycles to better predict and mitigate environmental changes.
  • Socio-ecological Systems: Researching the interactions between human societies and the environment to develop sustainable solutions that are socially equitable and environmentally sound.

2. Engineering & Technology Development:

• Smart Infrastructure:
  • Self-regulating Systems: Developing infrastructure that can adapt to changing conditions and optimize resource use autonomously.
  • Resilient Infrastructure: Designing infrastructure that can withstand extreme weather events and other environmental challenges.
• Circular Economy Technologies:
  • Advanced Recycling: Developing technologies to efficiently recover and reuse materials from complex products.
  • Product Design for Disassembly: Designing products with end-of-life in mind, enabling easy disassembly and material recovery.
• Environmental Remediation:
  • Pollution Removal: Researching new methods for removing pollutants from air, water, and soil.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Developing techniques for restoring damaged ecosystems and enhancing biodiversity.
• Sustainable Agriculture:
  • Vertical Farming: Optimizing vertical farming systems for efficient resource use and food production in urban areas.
  • Precision Agriculture: Developing advanced sensors and AI to optimize resource use in traditional agriculture.

3. Social & Behavioral Research:

• Sustainable Lifestyles:
  • Understanding Consumption Patterns: Researching the factors that influence consumption behavior and developing strategies to promote sustainable lifestyles.
  • Behavior Change: Developing interventions to encourage individuals and communities to adopt sustainable practices.
• Governance & Policy:
  • Sustainable Development Models: Developing models for sustainable economic and social development.
  • Policy Frameworks: Researching effective policy frameworks for promoting sustainable technology and behavior.
• Ethical Considerations:
  • Technology Ethics: Exploring the ethical implications of emerging sustainable technologies and developing guidelines for responsible innovation.
  • Social Justice: Ensuring that sustainable technologies are developed and deployed in a way that is equitable and just.

4. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

• Systems Thinking: Integrating knowledge and perspectives from different disciplines to address complex sustainability challenges.
• Open Innovation: Fostering collaboration between researchers, industry, and communities to accelerate the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.
• Global Knowledge Sharing: Promoting international cooperation and knowledge sharing to address global sustainability challenges.

Challenges and Considerations:

• Long Timescales: Research for 3360 requires a long-term perspective and a commitment to sustained investment.
• Uncertainty: Predicting the future is inherently uncertain, so research must be adaptable and responsive to changing conditions.
• Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations must be integrated into all stages of research and development to ensure that sustainable technologies are used responsibly.

By investing in fundamental science, engineering, social research, and interdisciplinary collaboration, we can lay the groundwork for a sustainable future in 3360 and beyond.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.