Sustainable Technology of 3330

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3330 ?

It seems you might be interested in the future of sustainable technology, specifically around the year 3330. While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, we can explore some potential trends and possibilities based on current advancements and challenges.

Potential Trends in Sustainable Technology by 3330:

Advanced Energy Solutions: Imagine highly efficient energy generation through fusion power, advanced solar technologies, or even energy harvested from space. Energy storage solutions could be incredibly compact and powerful, allowing for decentralized and readily available energy.
Closed-Loop Systems: By 3330, we might have perfected closed-loop systems for resource utilization. This means minimal waste as resources are continuously recycled and reused within interconnected systems.
Biotechnology Integration: Biotechnology could be seamlessly integrated into various aspects of life, from producing sustainable materials to purifying water and even remediating environmental damage.
AI-Driven Optimization: Artificial intelligence could play a crucial role in optimizing resource usage, predicting environmental changes, and managing complex sustainable systems.
Space-Based Solutions: With increased space exploration and colonization, we might see sustainable technologies developed for space applications influencing solutions on Earth, such as closed-loop life support systems or resource extraction from asteroids.

Challenges and Considerations:

Ethical Considerations: As technology advances, ethical considerations around its development and deployment become increasingly important. Ensuring equitable access and preventing misuse of powerful technologies will be crucial.
Planetary Boundaries: Even with advanced technology, respecting planetary boundaries will remain essential. We’ll need to ensure that our technological advancements do not exceed the Earth’s capacity to regenerate and absorb waste.
Adaptability and Resilience: Sustainable technologies must be adaptable to changing environmental conditions and resilient in the face of unforeseen challenges.

Looking Ahead:

While 3330 is far in the future, the journey towards sustainable technology is an ongoing process. By continuing to innovate, collaborate, and prioritize sustainability, we can create a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony.

Remember: This is just a glimpse into the potential future of sustainable technology. The actual path will depend on various factors, including scientific breakthroughs, societal choices, and global events.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3330 ?

It seems you’re asking to imagine what sustainable technology might look like in the year 3330. That’s quite a leap into the future! While we can’t know for sure, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the challenges we face today.

Here are some possibilities for sustainable technology in 3330:

Energy:
- Fusion power: Perhaps by then, we’ve mastered nuclear fusion, providing clean and abundant energy.
- Space-based solar: We might have huge solar arrays in space, beaming energy down to Earth.
- Ambient energy harvesting: Maybe we’ll be able to capture energy from our surroundings – vibrations, heat, even radio waves – to power our devices and infrastructure.
Resources:
- Closed-loop systems: We might have perfected systems where resources are continuously recycled and reused, creating minimal waste.
- Biotechnology: Maybe we’ll use biological processes to create sustainable materials, clean water, and even repair environmental damage.
- AI-driven optimization: Artificial intelligence could be managing our resources with incredible efficiency, predicting needs and minimizing waste.
Environment:
- Geoengineering: Perhaps we’ll have advanced technologies to safely manage the Earth’s climate and ecosystems.
- Pollution reversal: We might have ways to actively remove pollutants from the air and water, even reversing past damage.
- Space colonization: Maybe we’ll have established thriving settlements on other planets, with sustainable systems for life support and resource use.

Challenges to Overcome:

Even with these amazing technologies, there will still be challenges:

Ethical considerations: We’ll need to ensure these powerful technologies are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.
Planetary boundaries: Even with advanced tech, we’ll need to respect the limits of our planet’s resources and ability to recover.
Adaptability: Our technologies will need to be resilient and adaptable to unexpected changes and challenges.

It’s exciting to imagine the possibilities! The future of sustainable technology depends on the choices we make today. By prioritizing innovation, collaboration, and a deep respect for our planet, we can create a future where technology and nature thrive together.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3330 ?

It’s interesting to think about who would need sustainable technology in 3330! Here’s a breakdown of potential beneficiaries:

Humanity: This is the most obvious one. Sustainable technology would be essential for ensuring the survival and well-being of human civilization in 3330. It would provide clean energy, manage resources, and help us adapt to environmental changes.
Future Generations: We have a responsibility to leave a habitable planet for those who come after us. Sustainable technology is key to fulfilling that responsibility, ensuring that future generations have access to the resources they need.
Ecosystems: Sustainable technology wouldn’t just benefit humans. It would also be crucial for maintaining healthy ecosystems. By minimizing pollution and protecting biodiversity, it would help ensure the survival of countless species.
Other Intelligent Life: If we encounter other intelligent life forms in the universe, sustainable technology could be vital for peaceful coexistence. It would allow us to interact with other civilizations without harming their environments or depleting their resources.

Essentially, everyone and everything that depends on a healthy planet would need sustainable technology in 3330. It would be a fundamental requirement for a thriving future.

It’s important to remember that the need for sustainable technology is not something that will suddenly appear in 3330. It’s a need that exists right now. The choices we make today will determine whether future generations have access to the sustainable technologies they will need to thrive.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3330 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will be like in 3330, but when it will be needed.

The answer is: Sustainable technology is needed NOW.

While the advanced technologies we imagine for 3330 might seem far off, the need for sustainability is urgent. We are already facing challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. These problems are not going to wait until 3330 to become critical.

Here’s why sustainable technology is needed now:

To mitigate climate change: We need to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions to prevent the most catastrophic effects of climate change. This requires sustainable energy sources, energy efficiency, and carbon capture technologies.
To conserve resources: We are depleting many of Earth’s resources at an alarming rate. Sustainable technology can help us use resources more efficiently, recycle them, and find alternatives.
To protect ecosystems: Pollution and habitat destruction are harming ecosystems around the world. Sustainable technology can help us reduce our impact on the environment and protect biodiversity.
To ensure a healthy future: Sustainable technology is essential for ensuring a healthy and prosperous future for all. It can improve air and water quality, provide access to clean energy, and create sustainable jobs.

The technologies we develop today will shape the world of 3330. By investing in sustainable technology now, we can create a future where humanity and nature can thrive together.

It’s not just about imagining what might be possible in the distant future. It’s about taking action today to build a sustainable world for ourselves and for generations to come.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3330 ?

Sustainable technology in 3330 (and, importantly, now) is required everywhere. It’s not a matter of a specific location, but rather a pervasive need across all environments and scales. Here’s a breakdown:

Globally: Climate change, ocean acidification, and biodiversity loss are global problems requiring global solutions. Sustainable technologies are needed to address these challenges on a planetary scale.
Locally: Every community, city, and region needs sustainable solutions tailored to its specific context. This could involve local energy generation, waste management, water purification, and sustainable agriculture.
Infrastructures: Our buildings, transportation systems, and energy grids need to be redesigned with sustainability in mind. This includes using sustainable materials, improving energy efficiency, and adopting renewable energy sources.
Industries: All industries, from manufacturing to agriculture, need to adopt sustainable practices. This involves reducing waste, minimizing pollution, and using resources more efficiently.
Homes and Communities: Sustainable technology can be integrated into our homes and communities through smart appliances, energy-efficient buildings, and sustainable transportation options.
Space: As we venture further into space, sustainable technologies will become even more critical. We’ll need closed-loop life support systems, in-situ resource utilization, and sustainable energy sources for space exploration and colonization.

In short, sustainable technology is not confined to a particular place. It’s a necessity for a healthy and thriving future, whether we’re talking about our homes, our cities, our planet, or even beyond. The need is universal, and the solutions must be implemented everywhere.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3330 ?

You’re asking a really important question! It’s not just what and where sustainable technology is needed, but how we’ll achieve it, especially when thinking about the distant future of 3330. Here’s a breakdown of the “how” for sustainable technology, keeping in mind both today’s needs and the long-term vision:

1. Continuous Innovation and Research:

Fundamental Science: Investing in basic research is crucial. Breakthroughs in fields like materials science, energy physics, and biotechnology can lay the foundation for entirely new sustainable technologies.
Applied Research and Development: We need to translate scientific discoveries into practical applications. This involves developing and testing prototypes, scaling up production, and making technologies affordable and accessible.

2. Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing:

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Sustainable technology requires experts from various fields to work together – scientists, engineers, designers, policymakers, and social scientists.
Global Cooperation: Sharing knowledge and technologies across borders is essential to accelerate progress and ensure equitable access to sustainable solutions.

3. Education and Awareness:

STEM Education: We need to inspire and train the next generation of scientists, engineers, and innovators who will develop sustainable technologies.
Public Engagement: Raising awareness about the importance of sustainability and empowering individuals to make sustainable choices is crucial.

4. Policy and Regulation:

Incentives: Governments can play a role by providing incentives for the development and adoption of sustainable technologies, such as tax breaks, subsidies, and carbon pricing.
Regulations: Setting standards and regulations can help ensure that technologies are safe and environmentally sound.

5. Economic and Market Forces:

Sustainable Business Practices: Businesses need to integrate sustainability into their operations, from sourcing materials to manufacturing and distribution.
Consumer Demand: Consumers can drive demand for sustainable products and services by making informed choices and supporting companies that prioritize sustainability.

6. Long-Term Vision and Commitment:

Sustainable Development Goals: The UN Sustainable Development Goals provide a framework for global action on sustainability, including technological advancements.
Intergenerational Responsibility: We need to think about the long-term impacts of our choices and act in a way that ensures a sustainable future for generations to come.

For 3330 and Beyond:

While we can’t predict the future, these “how” factors are crucial for creating the advanced sustainable technologies of 3330. It’s about continuous learning, adapting to new challenges, and always striving for a better future.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about technological solutions. It’s also about social, economic, and political factors. Achieving a sustainable future requires a holistic approach that integrates technology with changes in behavior, policies, and values.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3330 ?

It’s impossible to create a real case study for sustainable technology in 3330, as we can’t predict the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and imagine what such a case study might look like. This allows us to explore the complexities and potential challenges of achieving true sustainability in the far future.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Great Atmospheric Regeneration Project – 3330

Background: By the early 33rd century, despite significant advancements in renewable energy, localized atmospheric pollution remained a problem in densely populated areas. Centuries of industrial activity, even with cleaner technologies, had left a legacy of pollutants in the air. The Great Atmospheric Regeneration Project (GARP) was initiated to address this challenge.

Technology: GARP utilized a combination of advanced technologies:

Atmospheric Nano-bots: These microscopic robots were deployed to capture and neutralize pollutants at the molecular level. They were powered by ambient energy harvested from the air itself.
Bio-Integrated Filtration Systems: Large-scale bio-engineered filtration systems, integrated into urban landscapes, used genetically modified plants and microorganisms to absorb and break down pollutants.
Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (Controlled): A highly refined and carefully managed version of stratospheric aerosol injection was used to reflect sunlight and counteract regional warming trends caused by residual greenhouse gases. This was a last resort and used with extreme caution due to past negative effects of earlier, less controlled attempts at geoengineering.
AI-Powered Environmental Management: A sophisticated AI system monitored air quality in real-time, optimizing the deployment of nano-bots and the operation of filtration systems. It also predicted pollution patterns and proactively adjusted control measures.

Implementation: GARP was a global effort, involving collaboration between governments, scientific institutions, and private companies. It required massive investment in research, development, and infrastructure. Public education campaigns were essential to gain support for the project and ensure responsible use of the technologies.

Challenges:

Nano-bot Maintenance: Ensuring the long-term functionality and preventing unintended consequences of the nano-bots was a major challenge. Self-replication was strictly forbidden, requiring constant monitoring and occasional replacement.
Ecosystem Impacts: The bio-integrated filtration systems had to be carefully designed to avoid disrupting local ecosystems. Extensive research was conducted to ensure that the genetically modified organisms did not escape and cause unforeseen problems.
Geoengineering Risks: Even with careful control, the stratospheric aerosol injection carried potential risks, including regional climate variations and ozone depletion. International cooperation and strict regulations were essential to manage these risks.
Ethical Considerations: The use of advanced technologies like nano-bots and geoengineering raised ethical concerns about potential misuse and unintended consequences. Public debate and transparent decision-making were crucial.

Outcomes:

Significant improvement in air quality in urban areas.
Reduction in respiratory illnesses and other health problems.
Reversal of some localized warming trends.
Increased understanding of complex atmospheric processes.

Lessons Learned:

Sustainable technology requires long-term vision and commitment.
Collaboration between different stakeholders is essential.
Ethical considerations must be carefully addressed.
Even with advanced technology, unintended consequences are possible, requiring constant monitoring and adaptation.

This hypothetical case study illustrates the kind of complex challenges and solutions that might be part of achieving true sustainability in the far future. It emphasizes the importance of continuous innovation, collaboration, ethical considerations, and a deep understanding of our planet’s complex systems.

COURTESY :RBC

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3330 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3330 – A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3330. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, by extrapolating current trends, analyzing emerging technologies, and considering the persistent challenges facing humanity, we can paint a plausible picture of how sustainable practices might be integrated into every facet of life over a millennium from now. This paper examines potential advancements in energy, resource management, environmental remediation, and the crucial role of artificial intelligence in achieving a truly sustainable civilization. It also addresses the ethical considerations and societal shifts necessary to ensure equitable access and responsible implementation of these advanced technologies.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is an ongoing journey, not a destination. While we face significant environmental challenges today, the trajectory of technological development offers hope for a future where human civilization thrives in harmony with the natural world. This paper envisions the potential state of sustainable technology in 3330, acknowledging that this is a speculative exercise, but one that is essential for guiding our current research and development efforts.

2. Energy Production and Consumption:

By 3330, reliance on fossil fuels will be a distant memory. Several potential energy sources could dominate:

Fusion Power: Controlled nuclear fusion, if mastered, could provide clean, abundant, and virtually limitless energy.
Space-Based Solar: Massive solar arrays orbiting Earth could capture sunlight unimpeded by atmospheric interference, beaming energy down to the planet.
Ambient Energy Harvesting: Advanced nanomaterials might allow us to capture energy from the environment itself – vibrations, heat gradients, even electromagnetic radiation.

Energy storage will be equally crucial. Highly efficient and compact storage solutions, potentially based on advanced battery technologies or even entirely new principles, will enable decentralized energy grids and power everything from individual devices to entire cities.

3. Resource Management and Circular Economy:

The concept of “waste” as we understand it today will likely be obsolete. Closed-loop systems will be the norm:

Molecular Recycling: Advanced nanotechnology could allow us to break down materials at the molecular level and reuse their components indefinitely.
Biomanufacturing: Biological processes will be harnessed to create sustainable materials, from biodegradable plastics to self-healing infrastructure.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems will optimize food production, minimizing resource inputs and maximizing yields while minimizing environmental impact.

4. Environmental Remediation and Planetary Engineering:

Reversing the damage caused by centuries of industrial activity will be a major undertaking. Technologies like:

Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Advanced systems will actively remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, potentially even converting them into useful products.
Ocean Revitalization: Technologies will be developed to restore damaged marine ecosystems and combat ocean acidification.
Controlled Geoengineering: Highly precise and carefully managed interventions might be used to mitigate large-scale environmental changes, but only as a last resort and with extreme caution.

5. The Role of Artificial Intelligence:

AI will be integral to achieving sustainability in 3330:

System Optimization: AI will manage complex systems, from energy grids to resource allocation, optimizing efficiency and minimizing waste.
Predictive Modeling: AI will predict environmental changes and potential risks, allowing us to proactively adapt and mitigate negative impacts.
Autonomous Systems: Robots and other autonomous systems will perform tasks that are dangerous or difficult for humans, such as environmental monitoring and remediation.

6. Ethical Considerations and Societal Shifts:

The development and deployment of advanced sustainable technologies will raise complex ethical questions:

Equitable Access: Ensuring that everyone benefits from these technologies, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status, will be a critical challenge.
Technological Unemployment: As automation becomes more prevalent, we will need to address the potential for job displacement and create new opportunities for human endeavor.
Environmental Justice: We must ensure that the burdens of environmental damage are not disproportionately borne by marginalized communities.

Achieving a sustainable future will require not only technological advancements but also significant societal shifts:

Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require unprecedented levels of international cooperation.
Sustainable Consumption: Individuals will need to adopt more sustainable lifestyles, reducing their consumption of resources and minimizing their environmental footprint.
Intergenerational Responsibility: We must act in a way that protects the interests of future generations, ensuring that they inherit a healthy and thriving planet.

7. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 3330 presented in this white paper is ambitious, but achievable. By investing in research and development, fostering collaboration, and addressing the ethical and societal challenges, we can create a future where technology empowers us to live in harmony with nature and ensures a prosperous and equitable future for all. The journey begins today.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3330 ?

Let’s imagine some industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3330, building on the concepts we’ve discussed:

1. Advanced Materials Production:

Bio-Integrated Factories: Imagine factories that utilize bio-engineered organisms to produce materials. These “bio-factories” could grow everything from structural components to advanced polymers, all while minimizing waste and utilizing renewable resources. These might even be self-healing, capable of repairing damage autonomously.
Molecular Assemblers: Nanotechnology could allow for the creation of molecular assemblers, machines capable of constructing materials atom by atom. This would enable the production of incredibly strong, lightweight, and customizable materials with precisely tailored properties. Imagine construction materials grown on-site, or customized tools created on demand.
Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Factories would operate on closed-loop systems, where all byproducts are recycled and reused. Raw materials would be sourced sustainably, and manufacturing processes would be designed to minimize energy consumption and waste generation.

2. Energy-Intensive Industries:

Fusion-Powered Manufacturing: Industries like steel production or aluminum smelting, which are currently very energy-intensive, could be powered by clean and abundant fusion energy. This would drastically reduce their environmental impact.
Space-Based Resource Extraction: Mining and resource extraction could shift to space, where asteroids and other celestial bodies could provide access to valuable minerals without damaging Earth’s ecosystems. These resources could be transported back to Earth using sustainable propulsion systems.
3D Printing at Macro and Micro Scales: Advanced 3D printing, or additive manufacturing, would allow for the creation of complex structures and devices with incredible precision and minimal waste. This could revolutionize manufacturing across a wide range of industries, from aerospace to construction.

3. Resource Management and Recycling:

Automated Recycling Facilities: Highly automated recycling facilities, powered by AI and robotics, could sort and process waste with incredible efficiency, recovering valuable materials and minimizing landfill waste. These facilities might even be mobile, able to process waste on-site.
Pollution Remediation: Industries that historically generated pollution would utilize advanced technologies to clean up their past contamination. Nanobots and bio-remediation systems could be deployed to remove pollutants from the air, water, and soil.
Resource Optimization: AI-powered systems would manage resource flows across entire industrial ecosystems, optimizing the use of materials and energy and minimizing waste. This could involve complex supply chain management and dynamic resource allocation.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Controlled Environments: Vertical farms and other controlled-environment agriculture systems could be located in urban areas, minimizing transportation costs and reducing the environmental impact of food production. These facilities could utilize hydroponics, aeroponics, and other advanced techniques to grow crops with minimal water and nutrient inputs.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems could monitor crops in real-time, optimizing irrigation, fertilization, and pest control. This would increase yields while minimizing the use of resources and reducing environmental impact.
Sustainable Food Processing: Food processing facilities would utilize sustainable energy sources and minimize waste. Advanced technologies could be used to create new and sustainable food products, such as plant-based meat substitutes or cultured meat.

5. Transportation and Logistics:

Sustainable Transportation: Industries would rely on sustainable transportation systems, such as electric vehicles powered by renewable energy, or even advanced maglev trains.
Optimized Logistics: AI-powered systems would optimize logistics and supply chains, minimizing transportation distances and reducing fuel consumption.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could transform industry in 3330. The key is that sustainability would be fully integrated into every aspect of industrial activity, from material sourcing to manufacturing processes to waste management. The focus would be on minimizing environmental impact, conserving resources, and creating a circular economy where waste is eliminated and resources are used efficiently.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3330 ?

It’s fascinating to consider the research and development (R&D) pathways that might lead to the sustainable technologies of 3330! Here’s a breakdown of potential areas of focus, keeping in mind that this is speculative but based on current trends and emerging fields:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

Nanomaterials: Research into nanomaterials will likely continue to be crucial. Scientists might develop new types of nanomaterials with unprecedented properties, such as self-healing materials, super-strong and lightweight composites, or materials that can capture and store energy.
Biomimicry: Studying natural materials and processes could inspire the development of new sustainable materials. For example, researchers might learn from how plants create strong and flexible structures to design new building materials.
Smart Materials: Materials that can respond to their environment could have a wide range of applications. For example, materials that can adapt to temperature changes could be used to build energy-efficient buildings.

2. Energy Technologies:

Fusion Energy: Continued research into nuclear fusion is essential. If successful, it could provide a clean and abundant source of energy.
Space-Based Solar: Developing the technology to efficiently capture solar energy in space and beam it back to Earth will require significant R&D efforts.
Ambient Energy Harvesting: Scientists might discover new ways to capture energy from the environment, such as vibrations, heat, or even radio waves.
Advanced Energy Storage: Research into new energy storage technologies, such as advanced batteries or even entirely new methods of storing energy, will be crucial for making renewable energy sources reliable.

3. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing:

Synthetic Biology: This field could allow us to design and create new biological systems with specific functions, such as producing sustainable materials or breaking down pollutants.
Genetic Engineering: Modifying organisms to perform specific tasks, such as cleaning up pollution or producing biofuels, could be a powerful tool for sustainability.
Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to create materials and products could revolutionize manufacturing, making it more sustainable and less reliant on fossil fuels.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics:

AI for System Optimization: Developing AI systems that can manage complex systems, such as energy grids or resource allocation, will be crucial for maximizing efficiency and minimizing waste.
AI for Environmental Monitoring: AI-powered systems could monitor the environment in real-time, detecting changes and potential problems early on.
Autonomous Systems: Robots and other autonomous systems could be used to perform tasks that are dangerous or difficult for humans, such as environmental remediation or resource extraction in space.

5. Environmental Science and Planetary Engineering:

Climate Modeling: Improving our understanding of the Earth’s climate system through advanced modeling will be essential for predicting future changes and developing effective mitigation strategies.
Geoengineering: Research into controlled geoengineering techniques, while approached with caution, could be necessary to mitigate the effects of climate change.
Ecosystem Restoration: Developing new methods for restoring damaged ecosystems will be crucial for protecting biodiversity and ensuring the health of our planet.

6. Social Sciences and Sustainability:

Sustainable Behavior: Understanding how to encourage people to adopt more sustainable lifestyles will be crucial for achieving a truly sustainable future.
Environmental Economics: Developing economic models that account for the value of natural resources and the costs of environmental damage will be essential for making sustainable choices.
Environmental Justice: Research into environmental justice will help ensure that the benefits of sustainable technology are shared equitably and that the burdens of environmental damage are not disproportionately borne by marginalized communities.

Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

It’s important to emphasize that progress in sustainable technology will require interdisciplinary collaboration. Scientists, engineers, social scientists, and policymakers will need to work together to develop solutions that are both technologically sound and socially acceptable.

Long-Term Vision:

The research and development of sustainable technology for 3330 and beyond requires a long-term vision and a commitment to continuous innovation. We need to invest in basic research, support the development of new technologies, and foster a culture of collaboration and knowledge sharing. The future of sustainable technology depends on the choices we make today.

COURTESY : Carnegie India

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.