Sustainable Technology of 3290

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 3290 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3290 ?

It seems like you might be asking about sustainable technologies that could be relevant in the year 3290. While we can’t predict the future with certainty, we can explore some potential areas of focus based on current trends and challenges:

1. Advanced Energy Solutions:

  • Fusion Power: If we achieve practical fusion power, it could provide a clean and virtually limitless energy source.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Harvesting solar energy in space and beaming it to Earth could provide a continuous and abundant source of power.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions will be crucial for utilizing renewable energy sources effectively.

2. Resource Management and Circular Economy:

  • Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies that enable the complete recycling and reuse of materials, minimizing waste and resource depletion.
  • Advanced Material Science: Developing new materials that are durable, sustainable, and easily recyclable.
  • Resource Extraction from Space: Mining resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies could supplement Earth’s limited resources.

3. Environmental Remediation and Restoration:

  • Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Technologies to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it safely.
  • Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Advanced methods to remove pollutants from the oceans and restore marine ecosystems.
  • Climate Engineering: Techniques to deliberately alter the Earth’s climate system to counteract the effects of global warming (though these carry potential risks).

4. Sustainable Agriculture and Food Production:

  • Vertical Farming and Urban Agriculture: Growing crops in controlled environments in urban areas to reduce transportation costs and land use.
  • Precision Agriculture: Using technology to optimize crop yields while minimizing resource inputs like water and fertilizers.
  • Alternative Protein Sources: Developing sustainable and efficient ways to produce protein, such as cultured meat or plant-based alternatives.

5. Smart Cities and Infrastructure:

  • Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and other modes of transportation that reduce emissions and congestion.
  • Smart Grids: Energy systems that can efficiently distribute and manage renewable energy sources.
  • Green Buildings: Buildings designed to minimize their environmental impact through energy efficiency, water conservation, and the use of sustainable materials.

Important Considerations:

  • Ethical Implications: As we develop new technologies, it’s crucial to consider their ethical implications and ensure they are used responsibly.
  • Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require international cooperation and collaboration.
  • Resilience: Sustainable technologies should also be resilient to the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges.

It’s important to remember that these are just a few possibilities, and the actual sustainable technologies of 3290 could be very different. However, by focusing on innovation, collaboration, and ethical considerations, we can increase the chances of creating a sustainable future for all.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3290 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in the year 3290 is a fascinating thought experiment! While we can’t know for sure, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the challenges humanity might face in the distant future. Here are some possibilities:

1. Energy:

  • Fusion Power Dominance: If we manage to achieve practical and efficient fusion power, it could become the primary energy source, providing clean and virtually limitless energy.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Imagine vast arrays of solar panels in space, capturing sunlight without atmospheric interference and beaming it down to Earth. This could provide a continuous and abundant source of energy.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions would be essential to utilize these renewable sources effectively, allowing for energy to be stored and used when needed.

2. Resources and Environment:

  • Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies that enable the complete recycling and reuse of materials could become the norm, minimizing waste and resource depletion. We might see advanced systems that can break down any material into its basic components and then rebuild it into something new.
  • Advanced Material Science: We might develop new materials that are incredibly durable, sustainable, and easily recyclable. Imagine materials that can adapt to their environment or even repair themselves!
  • Resource Extraction from Space: As Earth’s resources dwindle, we might turn to space for mining resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies. This would require advanced robotics and space transportation technologies.
  • Environmental Remediation: Technologies to reverse the damage done to the environment could be highly advanced. Imagine systems that can efficiently remove pollutants from the oceans, restore damaged ecosystems, or even reverse climate change.

3. Food and Agriculture:

  • Vertical Farming and Urban Agriculture: Highly efficient vertical farms in urban areas could become a major source of food production, reducing transportation costs and land use. These farms might use advanced hydroponics or aeroponics to grow crops with minimal water and nutrients.
  • Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI could be used to optimize crop yields while minimizing resource inputs like water and fertilizers. Imagine drones that can analyze the health of individual plants and deliver targeted treatments.
  • Alternative Protein Sources: Sustainable and efficient ways to produce protein could be crucial. We might see cultured meat or plant-based alternatives that are indistinguishable from traditional meat, but with a much lower environmental impact.

4. Cities and Infrastructure:

  • Smart Cities: Cities could be highly interconnected and efficient, using technology to optimize everything from energy consumption to traffic flow. Imagine buildings that can adapt to the weather or transportation systems that can predict and avoid congestion.
  • Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and other modes of transportation that reduce emissions and congestion could be dominant. We might even see new forms of transportation that we can’t even imagine today.
  • Green Buildings: Buildings designed to minimize their environmental impact through energy efficiency, water conservation, and the use of sustainable materials could be the standard. Imagine buildings that can generate their own power or even clean the air around them.

Important Considerations:

  • Ethical Implications: As we develop these technologies, it’s crucial to consider their ethical implications and ensure they are used responsibly. We need to think about how these technologies might impact society and make sure they are used for the benefit of all.
  • Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require international cooperation and collaboration. We need to work together to develop and implement sustainable solutions.
  • Resilience: Sustainable technologies should also be resilient to the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges. We need to build systems that can withstand extreme weather events and other disruptions.

It’s important to remember that these are just a few possibilities, and the actual sustainable technologies of 3290 could be very different. However, by focusing on innovation, collaboration, and ethical considerations, we can increase the chances of creating a sustainable future for all.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3290 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just about what the sustainable technology of 3290 might be, but who it’s for. Here’s a breakdown of who would likely need and benefit from such advancements:

  • Humanity as a whole: This is the most obvious answer. Sustainable technologies are ultimately about ensuring the long-term survival and well-being of humanity. Everyone on Earth would benefit from clean energy, abundant resources, and a healthy environment.
  • Future generations: We have a responsibility to leave the planet in a habitable state for those who come after us. Sustainable technologies are essential for ensuring that future generations have access to the resources they need to thrive.
  • Ecosystems and the natural world: Sustainable technologies should aim to minimize human impact on the environment and even help to restore damaged ecosystems. This benefits not only humans but also all other species on Earth.
  • Developing nations: Access to sustainable technologies is particularly important for developing nations, which are often disproportionately affected by environmental problems. Sustainable solutions can help these countries to grow and develop in a way that is both economically and environmentally sound.
  • Industries and businesses: Many industries are already recognizing the importance of sustainability. Businesses that adopt sustainable technologies can reduce their environmental impact, improve their efficiency, and even gain a competitive advantage.
  • Governments and policymakers: Governments have a crucial role to play in promoting the development and adoption of sustainable technologies. This includes investing in research, creating incentives for sustainable practices, and enacting regulations to protect the environment.

Essentially, the sustainable technologies of 3290 would need to serve a wide range of stakeholders, from individuals to governments, and from businesses to ecosystems. It’s about creating a future where everyone can thrive in a healthy and sustainable world.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3290 ?

That’s a crucial question! While we might imagine the advanced sustainable technologies of 3290 as something far off, the truth is that the need for them is now.

Here’s why:

  • Urgent Environmental Challenges: We are already facing significant environmental challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. These problems are not going to solve themselves, and they are only going to get worse if we don’t take action. We need sustainable technologies now to mitigate these challenges and prevent further damage to the planet.
  • Long-Term Planning: Developing and implementing truly transformative sustainable technologies takes time. Research, development, and widespread adoption can take decades, even centuries. We need to start working on these technologies now to ensure they are ready when we need them most.
  • Building a Sustainable Future: The sustainable technologies of 3290 will be built upon the foundations we lay today. We need to invest in research and development, educate future generations, and create a culture that values sustainability now to make that future possible.
  • Ethical Considerations: As we develop new technologies, it’s crucial to consider their ethical implications. We need to have these conversations now to ensure that the technologies we create are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology is not something that will arise in the distant future; it’s a need that exists in this very moment. The sooner we start working on these technologies, the better our chances of creating a sustainable future for ourselves and generations to come.

COURTESY : RBC

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3290 ?

That’s a very insightful question! It’s not just about what the sustainable technology is, but where it’s needed. Here’s a breakdown of the key areas where sustainable technology in 3290 (and even today!) would be essential:

1. Global Scale:

  • Atmosphere and Climate: Technologies to address climate change, such as carbon capture and sequestration, climate engineering (with careful consideration), and advanced weather prediction systems.
  • Oceans: Solutions to clean up pollution, restore marine ecosystems, and manage ocean resources sustainably.
  • Global Resource Management: Systems for equitable distribution of resources, efficient recycling, and sustainable extraction of materials (potentially including from space).

2. Regional and National Levels:

  • Energy Infrastructure: Smart grids to distribute renewable energy, advanced energy storage solutions, and localized energy generation facilities.
  • Transportation Systems: Sustainable transportation networks, including electric vehicle infrastructure, high-speed rail, and potentially even more futuristic solutions.
  • Urban Planning: Smart cities designed for sustainability, with green buildings, efficient waste management, and localized food production.

3. Local and Community Levels:

  • Sustainable Agriculture: Vertical farms, community gardens, and other localized food production systems that reduce transportation needs and environmental impact.
  • Waste Management: Advanced recycling and composting facilities, as well as technologies to reduce waste generation in the first place.
  • Water Management: Systems for water conservation, purification, and reuse, especially in areas with water scarcity.

4. Individual and Household Levels:

  • Personal Energy Devices: Portable and efficient energy storage devices, potentially even wearable technology that can generate power.
  • Smart Home Systems: Homes that can optimize energy use, manage resources efficiently, and even grow some of their own food.
  • Sustainable Consumption: Technologies that help individuals make more sustainable choices about the products they buy and use.

5. Even Beyond Earth:

  • Space Habitats: As humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be crucial for creating self-sustaining habitats on other planets or in space.
  • Space Exploration: Sustainable propulsion systems, resource utilization in space, and closed-loop life support systems will be needed for long-term space missions.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 3290 would need to be implemented at every scale, from the global level to the individual level, and even beyond our planet. It’s about creating a sustainable future for all, no matter where they are.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3290 ?

You’re hitting on a really important point! It’s not just about what sustainable technology is needed, but how it’s developed and implemented. Here’s a look at the key aspects of “how” we’ll need to approach sustainable technology in 3290 (and, again, the groundwork starts now):

1. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

  • Scientists and Engineers: Researchers in fields like materials science, energy, biology, and computer science will need to work together to create innovative solutions.
  • Social Scientists and Economists: Understanding the social and economic impacts of new technologies is crucial for ensuring they are adopted effectively and equitably.
  • Ethicists and Philosophers: We need to consider the ethical implications of new technologies and ensure they are used responsibly.
  • Communities and Stakeholders: Involving local communities and other stakeholders in the development process is essential for creating solutions that meet their needs and values.

2. Systems Thinking:

  • Holistic Approach: Recognizing that everything is interconnected and that changes in one area can have ripple effects in others. Sustainable technologies need to be designed with a holistic understanding of their impacts on the environment, society, and the economy.
  • Life Cycle Assessment: Evaluating the environmental impact of a technology throughout its entire life cycle, from resource extraction to manufacturing, use, and disposal.
  • Circular Economy Principles: Designing technologies that enable the reuse and recycling of materials, minimizing waste and resource depletion.

3. Innovation and Experimentation:

  • Research and Development: Investing in basic research to explore new possibilities and in applied research to develop practical solutions.
  • Pilot Projects and Demonstrations: Testing new technologies in real-world settings to evaluate their effectiveness and identify any unintended consequences.
  • Adaptive Management: Being willing to learn from our mistakes and adjust our approaches as needed.

4. Education and Awareness:

  • Public Engagement: Communicating the importance of sustainability and the potential of new technologies to the public.
  • Education and Training: Preparing future generations of scientists, engineers, and other professionals with the skills and knowledge they need to develop and implement sustainable technologies.
  • Citizen Science: Engaging the public in research and data collection to accelerate the pace of innovation.

5. Policy and Governance:

  • Incentives and Regulations: Creating policies that encourage the development and adoption of sustainable technologies.
  • International Cooperation: Working together to address global challenges like climate change and resource depletion.
  • Ethical Frameworks: Developing guidelines and principles for the responsible use of new technologies.

Essentially, the “how” of sustainable technology in 3290 is about creating a collaborative, interdisciplinary, and forward-thinking approach to innovation. It’s about recognizing the interconnectedness of our world and working together to create a future where everyone can thrive.

Case study of Sustainable Technology of 3290 ?

It’s tough to give a specific case study for sustainable technology in 3290, as that’s over a thousand years in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical one based on the trends we see today and the challenges we might face:

Case Study: The Great Lakes Restoration Project – 3290

Background: By the late 21st century, the Great Lakes ecosystem in North America had suffered severe degradation. Industrial pollution, agricultural runoff, and invasive species had taken a heavy toll. Traditional methods of remediation proved insufficient.

The Solution: In 3290, we look back at the success of the Great Lakes Restoration Project, a multi-faceted approach that combined advanced technologies with ecological principles:

  • Nanobot Cleanup: Microscopic nanobots were deployed to target and break down pollutants at the molecular level, including microplastics and persistent chemicals. These nanobots were designed to be self-replicating, but with strict controls to prevent runaway reproduction.
  • Genetic Engineering for Resilience: Native species of fish and plants were genetically engineered to be more resistant to pollution and invasive species. This controversial but ultimately successful approach helped to restore the natural balance of the ecosystem.
  • Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Large-scale carbon capture facilities were built around the Great Lakes region, removing CO2 from the atmosphere and helping to mitigate climate change, which was exacerbating the lakes’ problems.
  • Smart Agriculture: Farmers in the region adopted advanced precision agriculture techniques, using sensors and AI to optimize fertilizer use and minimize runoff into the lakes.
  • Public Awareness and Education: Extensive educational programs were implemented to raise public awareness about the importance of the Great Lakes ecosystem and the need for sustainable practices.

Results: By 3290, the Great Lakes ecosystem had been largely restored. The water was clean, native species thrived, and the region had become a model for ecological restoration around the world. The project demonstrated the power of combining advanced technology with a deep understanding of ecological principles to achieve sustainability.

Lessons Learned:

  • Long-term vision: The Great Lakes Restoration Project was a centuries-long endeavor that required sustained commitment and investment.
  • Interdisciplinary collaboration: The project involved scientists, engineers, policymakers, and the public working together towards a common goal.
  • Ethical considerations: The use of genetic engineering and other advanced technologies raised ethical concerns that had to be carefully addressed.
  • Global cooperation: The project benefited from international collaboration and the sharing of knowledge and technologies.

This hypothetical case study highlights how sustainable technology in 3290 might involve a combination of advanced solutions, ecological understanding, and social awareness to address complex environmental challenges. It emphasizes the importance of long-term vision, collaboration, and ethical considerations in achieving sustainability.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3290 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3290: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3290, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties of long-term prediction while grounding its vision in current trends and emerging scientific principles. It argues that the sustainable technologies of 3290 will be characterized by deep integration of advanced scientific understanding, sophisticated engineering, and a pervasive ethical framework, driven by the imperative to address global challenges such as climate change, resource depletion, and ecosystem degradation. The paper outlines potential advancements in key areas, emphasizing the interconnectedness of technological solutions and the necessity for global collaboration.

1. Introduction:

The year 3290 represents a significant temporal distance, making precise technological forecasting inherently speculative. However, by extrapolating from current scientific trajectories and considering the long-term challenges facing humanity, we can construct a plausible vision of sustainable technology in this distant future. This vision is not merely technological; it is deeply intertwined with societal values, ethical considerations, and global cooperation.

2. Key Areas of Technological Advancement:

2.1 Energy:

  • Fusion Power: Widespread and efficient fusion energy is envisioned as the primary power source, providing clean, abundant energy with minimal environmental impact. Advanced materials and containment technologies will likely be crucial for achieving this.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar energy collection in space, beamed wirelessly to Earth, could supplement terrestrial energy generation, ensuring a constant and reliable energy supply.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions, potentially based on novel quantum phenomena or advanced materials, will be essential for balancing energy supply and demand, particularly with intermittent renewable sources.

2.2 Resource Management:

  • Closed-Loop Material Cycles: Near-perfect recycling and resource recovery systems will be commonplace, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization. Advanced material science and nanotechnology will enable the breakdown and reconstruction of materials at the molecular level.
  • Resource Extraction from Space: Mining of asteroids and other celestial bodies could supplement terrestrial resources, reducing pressure on Earth’s ecosystems. Autonomous robotic systems and advanced space transportation will be critical for this endeavor.
  • Bioremediation and Ecosystem Restoration: Advanced biotechnologies, including genetic engineering and synthetic biology, could be employed to restore damaged ecosystems and remediate pollution.

2.3 Food and Agriculture:

  • Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Highly efficient vertical farms and other controlled environment agriculture systems will be essential for producing food sustainably in urban areas and minimizing land use.
  • Precision Agriculture and Personalized Nutrition: Advanced sensors, AI, and data analytics will optimize crop yields and tailor food production to individual nutritional needs.
  • Alternative Protein Sources: Cultured meat and other alternative protein sources will likely play a significant role in reducing the environmental impact of food production.

2.4 Information and Communication Technologies:

  • Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Everything: Highly interconnected networks of sensors and devices will provide real-time data on environmental conditions, resource flows, and human activity, enabling optimized management of resources and infrastructure.
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: AI and machine learning will play a crucial role in optimizing complex systems, from energy grids to transportation networks, and in developing new sustainable technologies.

3. Ethical Considerations:

The development and deployment of sustainable technologies in 3290 must be guided by a robust ethical framework. This includes:

  • Environmental Justice: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and resources for all populations.
  • Intergenerational Equity: Considering the long-term impacts of technological choices on future generations.
  • Precautionary Principle: Exercising caution when deploying new technologies, particularly those with potentially significant environmental impacts.

4. Global Collaboration:

Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion requires international cooperation on an unprecedented scale. This includes:

  • Sharing of Knowledge and Technology: Open access to research findings and technological advancements is essential for accelerating innovation.
  • Joint Research and Development: Collaborative efforts between nations can leverage expertise and resources to address shared challenges.
  • International Agreements and Regulations: Global cooperation is necessary to establish ethical guidelines and standards for the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.

5. Conclusion:

The sustainable technologies of 3290 will be the product of centuries of scientific advancement, engineering innovation, and ethical reflection. By embracing a holistic, collaborative, and future-oriented approach, humanity can create a world where technology serves the needs of both present and future generations, ensuring a thriving planet for all. The seeds of this future are being planted today.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3290 ?

Let’s imagine some industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3290, building on the previous discussions:

1. Closed-Loop Manufacturing:

  • Scenario: A factory produces complex electronic devices. In 3290, this factory operates on closed-loop principles.
  • Technology: Advanced material science allows every component of the device to be broken down into its constituent atoms at the end of its life. Automated systems, perhaps using nanotechnology, then reconstruct these atoms into new products, eliminating the need for virgin materials and minimizing waste.
  • Impact: Drastically reduces resource depletion, minimizes pollution from mining and manufacturing, and creates a truly circular economy.

2. Space-Based Resource Acquisition and Processing:

  • Scenario: A mining company extracts rare earth minerals from asteroids.
  • Technology: Autonomous robotic spacecraft, powered by fusion energy, travel to asteroids and extract the desired materials. On-site processing facilities in space, using advanced 3D printing and other fabrication technologies, convert these raw materials into usable components or even finished products.
  • Impact: Provides access to resources beyond Earth, reducing pressure on terrestrial ecosystems and potentially enabling the development of new technologies that rely on these materials.

3. Advanced Biomanufacturing:

  • Scenario: A pharmaceutical company produces complex drugs and therapies.
  • Technology: Biomanufacturing processes, using genetically engineered microorganisms or cell cultures, create these products with high precision and efficiency. These processes are powered by renewable energy and designed to minimize waste and environmental impact. Perhaps even personalized medicine is created on demand using similar techniques.
  • Impact: Enables the sustainable production of pharmaceuticals, biofuels, and other valuable products, reducing reliance on traditional chemical manufacturing processes.

4. Large-Scale Environmental Remediation:

  • Scenario: A company specializes in restoring damaged ecosystems.
  • Technology: They deploy a combination of technologies, including nanobots for pollution removal, advanced bioremediation techniques using genetically modified organisms, and climate engineering technologies (with careful safeguards) to restore degraded habitats and even reverse some of the effects of climate change.
  • Impact: Enables the large-scale restoration of ecosystems, providing crucial environmental services and helping to maintain biodiversity.

5. Sustainable Infrastructure Development:

  • Scenario: A construction company builds a new city.
  • Technology: They use advanced materials that are self-healing and adaptable to environmental changes. Construction processes are fully automated and use closed-loop material cycles. The city’s infrastructure is designed to be highly efficient, using smart grids, sustainable transportation systems, and localized resource management.
  • Impact: Creates sustainable and resilient infrastructure that minimizes environmental impact and enhances quality of life.

6. Energy Intensive Industries:

  • Scenario: Aluminum production, traditionally very energy intensive.
  • Technology: Fusion energy becomes the primary power source for aluminum smelting. Combined with advanced electrolysis techniques, the process becomes dramatically more efficient and environmentally friendly. Perhaps even new materials science allows for entirely different production methods.
  • Impact: Allows for the continuation of industries vital to modern society, but in a way that doesn’t harm the environment.

These are just a few examples, and the actual industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3290 might be far more diverse and complex. However, they illustrate the potential for these technologies to revolutionize industries and create a more sustainable future.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3290 ?

You’re asking about the really exciting part: how do we even get to the sustainable technologies of 3290? The answer lies in dedicated research and development across multiple fields, starting now. Here’s a glimpse into what that might look like:

1. Fundamental Science:

  • Advanced Materials:
    • Goal: Develop materials with unprecedented properties: super-strength, self-healing, adaptable, and completely recyclable.
    • Research: Explore nanotechnology, metamaterials, and bio-inspired materials.
    • Example: Imagine a building material that can repair itself after damage or adapt its properties to changing weather conditions.
  • Energy Physics:
    • Goal: Achieve practical and efficient fusion power, understand and harness new forms of energy.
    • Research: Invest in fusion reactor development, explore alternative energy sources like zero-point energy (though highly speculative).
    • Example: A breakthrough in plasma confinement could make fusion energy a reality.
  • Biological Systems:
    • Goal: Understand and manipulate biological systems for applications in bioremediation, biomanufacturing, and agriculture.
    • Research: Advance synthetic biology, genetic engineering, and systems biology.
    • Example: Engineering microbes to break down pollutants or create valuable biofuels.

2. Engineering and Applied Sciences:

  • Nanotechnology:
    • Goal: Develop and control devices at the nanoscale for applications in medicine, manufacturing, and environmental cleanup.
    • Research: Explore nanobots, self-assembling structures, and nano-scale manipulation of matter.
    • Example: Nanobots that can target and destroy cancer cells or clean up pollution at the molecular level.
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning:
    • Goal: Develop AI systems that can optimize complex systems, analyze vast amounts of data, and design new technologies.
    • Research: Advance machine learning algorithms, develop AI for materials discovery, and explore AI-driven design for sustainable systems.
    • Example: AI that can design new materials with specific properties or optimize energy grids for maximum efficiency.
  • Space Technologies:
    • Goal: Develop advanced space transportation, resource extraction, and habitation technologies.
    • Research: Invest in advanced propulsion systems (like fusion rockets), autonomous robotics for space mining, and closed-loop life support systems.
    • Example: Robotic spacecraft that can mine asteroids for valuable resources and bring them back to Earth.

3. Interdisciplinary Research:

  • Systems Thinking:
    • Goal: Develop a holistic understanding of how different technologies and systems interact and impact the environment and society.
    • Research: Create models and simulations to study complex systems and identify potential unintended consequences of new technologies.
    • Example: Modeling the long-term impacts of climate engineering technologies on global ecosystems.
  • Sustainability Science:
    • Goal: Develop a framework for understanding and addressing sustainability challenges.
    • Research: Study the interactions between human society and the environment, develop metrics for sustainability, and explore pathways to a sustainable future.
    • Example: Research on the social and economic factors that influence the adoption of sustainable technologies.

4. Societal and Ethical Considerations:

  • Ethical Frameworks:
    • Goal: Develop ethical guidelines for the development and deployment of new technologies.
    • Research: Explore the ethical implications of advanced technologies like genetic engineering and AI, and develop frameworks for responsible innovation.
    • Example: Guidelines for the use of genetic engineering in agriculture to ensure food safety and environmental protection.
  • Public Engagement:
    • Goal: Engage the public in discussions about the future of technology and sustainability.
    • Research: Study public perceptions of new technologies, develop effective communication strategies, and promote citizen science initiatives.
    • Example: Public forums and educational programs to discuss the potential benefits and risks of new technologies.

This research and development effort needs to be a continuous process, with each generation building on the knowledge and discoveries of the previous one. It requires long-term vision, sustained investment, and collaboration across disciplines and nations. By starting this work today, we can lay the foundation for the sustainable technologies of 3290 and beyond.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

[edit]

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available u
  2. nder a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 I
  3. nternational License
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Ann
  6. e; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  7. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  9. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  10. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  12. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  13. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  14. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  15. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  16. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  17. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  18. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  19. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  22. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  25. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  26. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  28. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  29. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  30. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  31. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  32. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  33. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  34. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  35. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  36. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  37. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  38. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  39. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  40. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  42. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  45. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  46. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  47. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  48. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  49. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  50. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  51. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  52. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  53. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  54. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  55. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  56. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  57. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  58. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  59. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  60. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  61. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  62. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  63. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  65. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  66. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  67. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  68. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  69. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  70. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  71. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  72. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  73. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  74. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  75. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  76. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  77. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  78. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  79. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  81. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  82. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  83. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  84. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  85. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  86. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  87. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  88. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  89. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  90. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  91. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  93. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  94. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  95. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  96. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  97. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  98. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  99. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  100. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  101. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  102. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  103. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  104. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  105. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  106. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  107. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  108. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  109. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  110. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  111. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  112. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  113. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  114. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  115. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  116. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  117. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  118. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  119. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  120. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  121. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  122. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  123. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  124. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  125. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  126. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »