Sustainable Technology of 3260

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3260 ?

Sustainable technology in 3260 would likely be far more advanced than what we have today. Here are some potential advancements:

Advanced materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be made from self-healing, biodegradable, or even grown materials.
Renewable energy: Energy would likely be harvested from a variety of sources, including solar, wind, geothermal, and even space-based solar farms.
Closed-loop systems: Manufacturing and consumption would focus on closed-loop systems, where resources are continuously reused and recycled.
Precision agriculture: Food production would be highly efficient and localized, using advanced technologies to optimize resource use and minimize waste.
Smart cities: Urban centers would be designed to minimize environmental impact, with efficient transportation, energy, and waste management systems.
Biotechnology: Advances in biotechnology could lead to new ways of producing energy, materials, and even food, while minimizing environmental impact.
Artificial intelligence: AI could play a key role in optimizing resource use, predicting and mitigating environmental risks, and developing new sustainable technologies.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual sustainable technologies of 3260 could be very different from what we imagine today. However, it’s clear that sustainability will be a critical concern for future generations, and technology will play a key role in addressing this challenge.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3260 ?

It’s impossible to say for sure what sustainable technology will look like in 3260. That’s over a thousand years in the future! However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the challenges we’ll likely still be facing. Here are some possibilities:

1. Radical Resource Efficiency:

Closed-loop systems: Imagine manufacturing where everything is reused or recycled endlessly. Materials would be designed to be disassembled and repurposed, with minimal waste.
Hyper-efficient energy: Energy might be harvested from space-based solar farms, advanced geothermal, or even fusion power. Every device would be incredibly energy-efficient, perhaps even self-powered.
Precision agriculture: Food production would be highly optimized, using minimal land, water, and nutrients. Vertical farms and lab-grown food could be commonplace.

2. Bio-Integrated Technology:

Living materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be made from grown materials like bio-concrete or self-healing polymers.
Biotechnology: We might use engineered microbes to produce fuels, materials, or even clean up pollution.
Human augmentation: Technology could be seamlessly integrated with our bodies, perhaps to monitor health, enhance senses, or even directly interact with the environment.

3. Smart and Adaptive Systems:

AI-powered optimization: Artificial intelligence would manage everything from energy grids to transportation networks, constantly optimizing for efficiency and sustainability.
Predictive maintenance: AI could predict when infrastructure needs repair, preventing costly and resource-intensive failures.
Personalized sustainability: Technology could help individuals make sustainable choices in their daily lives, from what they eat to how they travel.

4. Decoupling from Earth:

Space colonization: If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be crucial for creating self-sufficient habitats on other planets.
Asteroid mining: We might extract resources from asteroids to reduce our reliance on Earth’s limited supply.

Important Considerations:

Ethical development: It’s crucial that future technologies are developed and used responsibly, with consideration for their environmental and social impact.
Global cooperation: Addressing climate change and other sustainability challenges will require international collaboration and sharing of knowledge.

While we can’t predict the future with certainty, it’s clear that sustainable technology will play a vital role in shaping the world of 3260. By continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can create a future where both humanity and the planet thrive.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3260 ?

It’s not a question of who requires sustainable technology in 3260, but rather that sustainable technology will be absolutely essential for everyone in 3260. Here’s why:

Resource scarcity: Even with advancements in resource extraction and efficiency, the Earth’s resources are finite. By 3260, easily accessible resources may be depleted, making sustainable practices crucial for survival.
Climate change: The effects of climate change are likely to intensify over time. Sustainable technology will be necessary to mitigate these effects and adapt to a changing environment.
Population growth: If the human population continues to grow, sustainable technology will be needed to provide for everyone’s basic needs without further straining the planet’s resources.
Environmental degradation: Pollution and habitat destruction can have long-lasting consequences. Sustainable technology will be essential for cleaning up the environment and preventing further damage.

In short, sustainable technology in 3260 won’t be a luxury or a choice, but a necessity for human civilization to thrive. It will be woven into every aspect of life, from how we produce energy and food to how we build our cities and interact with the natural world.

Think of it like this: Imagine a city where the air is so polluted that people need to wear masks to breathe, or a world where food is scarce and expensive due to environmental damage. These are the kinds of scenarios that sustainable technology will help us avoid in 3260.

Ultimately, sustainable technology will be required by everyone in 3260 because it will be the foundation of a healthy and prosperous society.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3260 ?

You’re right to focus on the “when” – it’s a crucial part of the equation! While 3260 is the target year for widespread implementation, the need for sustainable technology is now. Here’s a breakdown of why:

Urgency of climate change: The effects of climate change are already being felt across the globe. We need to act now to mitigate further damage and prevent catastrophic consequences. Sustainable technologies are essential tools in this fight.
Resource depletion: Many of the Earth’s resources are finite. The longer we wait to adopt sustainable practices, the more depleted these resources will become, making the transition to a sustainable future even more difficult.
Population growth: The global population is increasing, and this puts further strain on resources and the environment. Sustainable technologies are needed to ensure that everyone has access to basic necessities without compromising the planet’s ability to support future generations.
Economic benefits: Investing in sustainable technology can create new jobs and industries, boost economic growth, and improve quality of life. There are many economic incentives to embrace sustainability.

So, the answer is: Sustainable technology is required NOW, and the need will only become more urgent as time goes on.

Think of it as building a house. You wouldn’t wait until the roof collapses to start fixing the foundation, right? Similarly, we can’t afford to wait until 3260 to start implementing sustainable technologies. We need to lay the groundwork now to ensure a sustainable future for ourselves and generations to come.

This means:

Investing in research and development: We need to continue developing new and innovative sustainable technologies.
Adopting sustainable practices: Individuals, businesses, and governments all need to adopt more sustainable practices in their daily lives and operations.
Educating and raising awareness: We need to educate people about the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technology.
International cooperation: Addressing climate change and other sustainability challenges requires global cooperation and collaboration.

By acting now, we can create a future where sustainable technology is not just a necessity, but a way of life.

COURTESY : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3260 ?

This is a great question that gets at the heart of how we think about sustainability! It’s not just about a single location, but rather a global shift. Here’s where sustainable technology will be required in 3260:

Everywhere on Earth: This includes:
- Urban centers: Cities will need to be redesigned for maximum efficiency, with sustainable transportation, energy systems, and waste management.
- Rural areas: Sustainable agriculture, resource management, and infrastructure will be crucial for supporting communities and preserving ecosystems.
- Extreme environments: Even in deserts, polar regions, and remote islands, sustainable technologies will be needed for human habitation and scientific research.
Beyond Earth: If humanity expands into space, sustainable technology will be even more critical:
- Space habitats: Self-sustaining colonies on other planets or in space will require closed-loop systems for resource management and energy production.
- Space exploration: Sustainable propulsion systems, resource utilization, and waste management will be essential for long-duration space missions.
In every sector: Sustainable technology won’t be confined to specific industries. It will be integrated into:
- Energy production: Renewable energy sources, smart grids, and energy-efficient devices will be essential.
- Food production: Precision agriculture, vertical farms, and alternative protein sources will be needed to feed a growing population.
- Manufacturing: Closed-loop systems, sustainable materials, and efficient production processes will minimize waste and environmental impact.
- Transportation: Electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and other sustainable transportation options will reduce emissions and congestion.
- Communication: Sustainable data centers, energy-efficient devices, and responsible e-waste management will be crucial.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 3260 will be a pervasive force, shaping every aspect of human life and activity, both on Earth and beyond. It will be the foundation of a thriving and resilient civilization.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3260 ?

Ah, now we’re getting to the core of it! How sustainable technology is required in 3260 will be a complex interplay of many factors, but here are some key aspects:

1. Integration and Interconnectedness:

Seamless systems: Sustainable technologies won’t exist in isolation. They’ll be deeply integrated and interconnected, working together to create a holistic and efficient system. Imagine a city where buildings generate their own energy, transportation is powered by renewable sources, and waste is recycled into new materials – all working in harmony.
Smart infrastructure: AI and advanced sensors will monitor and optimize resource use in real-time. Everything from energy grids to water systems will be “smart,” adapting to changing conditions and minimizing waste.

2. Adaptability and Resilience:

Dynamic systems: The environment is constantly changing, so sustainable technologies will need to be adaptable and resilient. They’ll be able to withstand extreme weather events, adapt to shifting resource availability, and even self-repair.
Decentralization: Relying on a single source for energy or food can be risky. Sustainable systems will likely be more decentralized, with local communities having greater control over their resources.

3. Circularity and Regeneration:

Closed-loop economies: The “take-make-dispose” model will be a thing of the past. Sustainable technologies will prioritize circularity, where resources are continuously reused and recycled.
Regenerative practices: We’ll move beyond simply minimizing environmental impact to actively restoring and regenerating ecosystems. This could involve using technology to clean up pollution, reforest degraded land, or even enhance biodiversity.

4. Technological Advancement:

Continued innovation: Sustainable technology in 3260 will be built on centuries of research and development. We can expect breakthroughs in areas like materials science, biotechnology, and artificial intelligence, leading to even more efficient and sustainable solutions.
Convergence of technologies: Different fields of technology will likely converge, creating new possibilities. For example, advances in biotechnology could lead to living materials that can be used to build self-healing infrastructure.

5. Social and Ethical Considerations:

Equitable access: Sustainable technology should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status. This will require global cooperation and a focus on social justice.
Ethical development: It’s crucial that future technologies are developed and used responsibly, with consideration for their environmental and social impact. This will require careful planning and regulation.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3260 will be a sophisticated and integrated system that prioritizes efficiency, resilience, and regeneration. It will be the result of continuous innovation and a commitment to ethical and equitable development.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3260 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study for sustainable technology in 3260, as that’s over a thousand years in the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on extrapolating current trends and imagining the kind of challenges and solutions future societies might face. This allows us to explore the kinds of advancements that might be considered sustainable in such a distant future.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Basin in 3260

Context: By 3260, centuries of environmental degradation, even with some mitigation efforts, have left the Amazon basin severely compromised. Climate change has altered rainfall patterns, leading to desertification in some areas and flooding in others. Biodiversity has plummeted, and traditional agriculture struggles to keep pace with a growing global population.

Challenge: To restore the Amazon basin to a thriving ecosystem while simultaneously providing resources and sustenance for the surrounding communities and the world.

Sustainable Technology Solutions Implemented:

Bio-Integrated Terraforming: Nanobots, programmed with specific DNA sequences, are deployed to revitalize degraded soils. These nanobots can break down pollutants, introduce beneficial microbes, and even “grow” soil from readily available materials. This process is combined with the strategic planting of genetically modified, drought-resistant, and flood-tolerant native species.
Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Conversion: Large-scale atmospheric carbon capture facilities, powered by space-based solar energy, pull excess CO2 from the atmosphere. This captured carbon is then converted into usable fuels and materials, such as bioplastics and carbon nanotubes, using advanced catalytic processes.
Precision Agroforestry: AI-powered drones and sensors monitor the health of the revitalized forests and agricultural areas. They provide real-time data on soil conditions, water availability, and pest activity. This data is used to optimize irrigation, fertilization, and crop selection, maximizing yields while minimizing environmental impact. Vertical farms integrated into local communities supplement traditional agriculture.
Closed-Loop Water Management: Advanced filtration and recycling systems ensure that every drop of water is used efficiently. Atmospheric water generators extract moisture from the air to supplement rainfall. Wastewater is treated and reused for irrigation and other non-potable purposes.
Bio-Energy Production: Genetically engineered algae farms convert sunlight into biofuel. Waste from agriculture and forestry is used to generate biogas. These renewable energy sources power local communities and the carbon capture facilities.
Symbiotic Urban Development: New settlements in the Amazon basin are designed to integrate seamlessly with the natural environment. Buildings are constructed from bio-grown materials and powered by renewable energy. Transportation systems prioritize walking, cycling, and electric vehicles. Waste is managed through closed-loop systems.

Results:

The Amazon basin is gradually restored to a thriving ecosystem, supporting a rich diversity of plant and animal life.
Local communities benefit from sustainable agriculture, access to clean water and energy, and improved living conditions.
The global climate is stabilized due to the reduction in atmospheric CO2 and the restoration of the Amazon’s carbon sink function.
New industries and jobs are created in the fields of bio-integrated terraforming, carbon capture, and sustainable agriculture.

Key Takeaways:

This hypothetical case study illustrates how a combination of advanced technologies, integrated systems thinking, and a focus on regeneration could be used to address complex environmental challenges in the future. It highlights the importance of:

Interdisciplinarity: Combining knowledge from various fields, such as biology, nanotechnology, AI, and engineering.
Scalability: Developing solutions that can be implemented on a large scale to have a significant impact.
Sustainability: Ensuring that solutions are environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable in the long term.

While this is just a hypothetical example, it provides a glimpse into the potential of sustainable technology to create a better future for all.

COURTESY : Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3260 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3260: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3260. It acknowledges the speculative nature of forecasting so far into the future but aims to stimulate thought and discussion about the long-term trajectory of technological development and its crucial role in achieving global sustainability. By examining current trends, potential challenges, and emerging technologies, this paper offers a vision of a future where humanity and the planet thrive in a symbiotic relationship.

1. Introduction:

The challenges of the 21st century, including climate change, resource depletion, and biodiversity loss, are likely to persist and evolve over the next millennium. Sustainable technology will be the cornerstone of humanity’s response to these challenges, ensuring the well-being of future generations. This paper posits that by 3260, sustainable practices will be deeply ingrained in every facet of human civilization, driven by necessity and enabled by transformative technological advancements.

2. Key Principles of Sustainable Technology in 3260:

Radical Resource Efficiency: Closed-loop systems will be the norm, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization. Materials will be designed for disassembly and repurposing, creating a circular economy.
Renewable Energy Dominance: Energy will be sourced primarily from renewable sources, including space-based solar power, advanced geothermal, and potentially fusion energy. Energy storage and distribution will be highly efficient, minimizing losses.
Bio-Integration: Biotechnology will play a central role, with living materials used for construction and self-healing infrastructure. Bio-engineered organisms may be used for bioremediation, resource production, and even energy generation.
Smart and Adaptive Systems: AI and machine learning will manage complex systems, optimizing everything from energy grids to transportation networks for maximum efficiency and sustainability. Predictive maintenance will prevent resource-intensive failures.
Decentralization and Localization: Sustainable systems will be more decentralized and localized, empowering communities to manage their own resources and reducing reliance on centralized infrastructure.
Regeneration and Restoration: Beyond simply minimizing environmental impact, technologies will be developed to actively restore and regenerate damaged ecosystems.

3. Envisioned Technologies of 3260:

Advanced Materials: Self-healing polymers, bio-concrete, and other advanced materials will be used to create durable and sustainable infrastructure.
Nanotechnology: Nanobots could be used for targeted delivery of resources, environmental remediation, and even manufacturing at the molecular level.
Biotechnology: Engineered microbes could produce biofuels, bioplastics, and other valuable products. Living materials could be grown for construction and other applications.
Artificial Intelligence: AI will optimize resource use, predict environmental changes, and manage complex systems.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar farms in space could beam clean energy to Earth, providing a virtually limitless supply.
Fusion Energy: If achieved, fusion power could provide a clean and abundant source of energy.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient energy storage technologies will be essential for balancing supply and demand from renewable sources.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered sensors and robotics will optimize crop yields while minimizing resource use.
Vertical Farming: Urban-based vertical farms will supplement traditional agriculture, reducing transportation costs and land use.
Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Manufacturing processes will be redesigned to eliminate waste and maximize resource recovery.

4. Challenges and Considerations:

Ethical implications: The development and deployment of advanced technologies must be guided by ethical principles to ensure equitable access and prevent unintended consequences.
Global cooperation: Addressing global sustainability challenges will require international collaboration and the sharing of knowledge and resources.
Social equity: The transition to a sustainable future must be just and equitable, ensuring that everyone benefits from the new technologies and opportunities.
Resilience: Sustainable systems must be resilient to the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges.

5. Conclusion:

While the specific technologies of 3260 remain speculative, it is clear that sustainable practices will be essential for humanity’s long-term survival and prosperity. By embracing innovation, prioritizing ethical development, and working together, we can create a future where technology empowers us to live in harmony with the planet. This vision requires long-term planning, continuous research, and a commitment to sustainability at all levels of society. The journey towards a sustainable future begins now, and the choices we make today will shape the world of 3260.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3260 ?

It’s fascinating to speculate on the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3260. Given the significant advancements we can anticipate, these applications would likely be radically different from today’s. Here are some possibilities:

1. Advanced Materials Production:

Bio-factories: Imagine factories that “grow” materials to precise specifications using engineered microorganisms. These could produce everything from structural components to complex electronics, all from renewable resources.
Molecular Manufacturing: Nanotechnology could allow for the manipulation of matter at the atomic level, enabling the creation of materials with unprecedented properties – super-strong, self-healing, or perfectly tailored to specific needs. Waste would be virtually eliminated.
Closed-Loop Recycling: Manufacturing processes would be entirely closed-loop, with every material endlessly recycled and repurposed. “Waste” as we know it would cease to exist.

2. Energy Generation and Distribution:

Space-Based Solar Power: Massive solar arrays in orbit could collect sunlight and beam it down to Earth, providing a continuous and clean source of energy.
Fusion Power: If fusion energy becomes a reality, it could provide a near-limitless source of clean power for industrial processes.
Decentralized Energy Grids: Smart grids powered by a mix of renewable sources (solar, wind, geothermal, etc.) would be highly efficient and resilient, adapting to fluctuating energy demands.

3. Manufacturing and Automation:

AI-Powered Factories: Highly automated factories managed by AI could optimize production processes for maximum efficiency and minimal waste. These factories might even be able to self-reconfigure to produce different products as needed.
Additive Manufacturing (Advanced 3D Printing): 3D printing at the nanoscale could enable the creation of incredibly complex objects with precise control over their material properties. This could revolutionize manufacturing, allowing for on-demand production of customized goods.
Personalized Production: Imagine ordering a product and having it “grown” or “printed” specifically for you, with the exact specifications you need. This level of personalized production could become commonplace.

4. Resource Extraction and Processing:

Asteroid Mining: Robots and AI could mine asteroids for valuable resources, reducing our reliance on Earth’s finite supply. These resources could be processed in space or transported back to Earth.
Deep-Sea Mining (Sustainable): If deep-sea mining is still necessary, it would be conducted with extreme care for the environment, using advanced technologies to minimize disruption to fragile ecosystems.
Bioremediation: Engineered microorganisms could be used to clean up pollution and extract valuable resources from waste materials.

5. Transportation and Logistics:

Hyper-Efficient Transportation: Advanced transportation systems, such as hyperloops or maglev trains, could move goods and people quickly and efficiently with minimal energy consumption.
Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles and drones could optimize logistics and delivery, reducing traffic congestion and emissions.

6. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Large-scale vertical farms powered by renewable energy and managed by AI could produce food efficiently in urban areas, reducing transportation costs and land use.
Lab-Grown Food: Cultured meat and other lab-grown foods could supplement traditional agriculture, reducing the environmental impact of livestock farming.

7. Waste Management and Remediation:

Complete Resource Recovery: Advanced recycling and reprocessing technologies could ensure that virtually all waste is recovered and reused.
Environmental Remediation: Nanotechnology and biotechnology could be used to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.

It’s important to remember that these are just a few possibilities. The actual industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3260 could be far more diverse and innovative than anything we can imagine today. The key is that sustainability will be at the core of every industrial process, driving innovation and ensuring a healthy planet for future generations.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3260 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development that might lead to the sustainable technologies of 3260! Here are some key areas of focus we can imagine, building upon current scientific trends:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

Self-healing materials: Imagine materials that can automatically repair themselves when damaged, extending their lifespan and reducing the need for replacements. This would be revolutionary for construction, infrastructure, and even consumer goods.
Bio-integrated materials: Researchers are already exploring materials grown from living organisms like bacteria or fungi. In 3260, these could be commonplace, offering sustainable and biodegradable alternatives to traditional materials.
Adaptive materials: Materials that can change their properties in response to their environment, like adjusting their color or shape, could be used to create dynamic and responsive buildings or devices.

2. Energy Technologies:

Fusion energy: If scientists can overcome the challenges of harnessing fusion, it could provide a clean and nearly limitless source of energy.
Space-based solar power: Collecting solar energy in space and beaming it back to Earth could provide a continuous and abundant source of renewable energy.
Advanced energy storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage technologies will be crucial for balancing supply and demand from renewable sources.

3. Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology:

Bio-manufacturing: Engineered microorganisms could be used to produce a wide range of products, from fuels and materials to pharmaceuticals and food, all from renewable resources.
Synthetic biology: This field could allow scientists to design and build new biological systems with specific functions, potentially leading to breakthroughs in areas like bioremediation, resource production, and even human health.
Living materials: Combining biology and materials science could lead to the creation of living materials that can self-repair, adapt to their environment, or even perform specific tasks.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics:

AI for optimization: AI systems could be used to manage complex systems, optimizing everything from energy grids to transportation networks for maximum efficiency and sustainability.
Robotics for automation: Advanced robots could automate manufacturing processes, resource extraction, and even environmental remediation, making these processes more efficient and sustainable.
AI for discovery: AI could be used to analyze vast amounts of data and accelerate scientific discovery, leading to breakthroughs in sustainable technologies.

5. Nanotechnology:

Molecular manufacturing: Nanotechnology could allow for the manipulation of matter at the atomic level, enabling the creation of materials and devices with unprecedented properties.
Nanobots for remediation: Nanobots could be deployed to clean up pollution, deliver targeted resources, or even repair damaged tissues.

6. Environmental Science and Ecology:

Ecosystem restoration: Advanced technologies could be used to restore damaged ecosystems, reintroduce endangered species, and even reverse the effects of climate change.
Climate modeling and prediction: Improved climate models and prediction tools will be essential for understanding and mitigating the impacts of climate change.
Biodiversity conservation: Technologies like gene editing and synthetic biology could be used to protect and enhance biodiversity.

7. Social Sciences and Ethics:

Sustainable development models: Researchers will need to develop new models for sustainable development that take into account social, economic, and environmental factors.
Ethical frameworks: Ethical frameworks will be needed to guide the development and deployment of advanced technologies, ensuring that they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.
Global cooperation: International collaboration and knowledge sharing will be essential for addressing global sustainability challenges.

It’s important to remember that these are just a few examples. The actual research and development that leads to the sustainable technologies of 3260 could be far more diverse and innovative than anything we can imagine today. The key is that this research will need to be interdisciplinary, collaborative, and focused on solving the complex challenges facing humanity and the planet

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.