Sustainable Technology of 3250

78 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3250 ?

Sustainable technology in 3250 is a fascinating topic to consider! While we can’t definitively know what it will look like, we can make some educated predictions based on current trends and potential future developments. Here are some possibilities:

Energy:

Fusion power: Likely a dominant energy source, providing clean and abundant energy.
Advanced solar: Highly efficient solar panels integrated into infrastructure, even in space-based solar farms.
Energy storage: Breakthrough technologies for storing energy, making renewable sources reliable 24/7.

Environment:

Carbon capture: Advanced technologies to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, potentially reversing climate change effects.
Ocean cleanup: Large-scale systems to remove plastic and other pollutants from the oceans.
Ecosystem restoration: Technologies to revitalize damaged ecosystems and promote biodiversity.

Resources:

Circular economy: Near-total recycling and reuse of materials, minimizing waste.
3D printing: On-demand manufacturing to reduce resource consumption and transportation needs.
Vertical farming: Widespread use of vertical farms in urban areas to produce food locally and sustainably.

Technology:

Artificial intelligence: AI systems managing energy grids, transportation, and resource allocation for optimal efficiency.
Nanotechnology: Advanced materials with unique properties for various applications, potentially including environmental remediation.
Biotechnology: Using biological systems for sustainable production of materials and energy.

Transportation:

Electric vehicles: Domination of electric vehicles powered by renewable energy.
Hyperloop: High-speed transportation systems for fast and efficient travel between cities.
Flying vehicles: Personal air transportation for reduced traffic congestion and increased mobility.

Buildings:

Self-sufficient buildings: Buildings generating their own energy and managing their own waste and water.
Green buildings: Structures designed to minimize environmental impact and maximize energy efficiency.
Smart homes: Homes with integrated technology to optimize energy use and resource management.

Other possibilities:

Space colonization: Sustainable technologies for living and working in space, potentially on other planets.
Geoengineering: Technologies to deliberately alter the Earth’s climate system to counteract global warming.
Consciousness about sustainability: A widespread understanding and commitment to sustainable practices across all aspects of society.

It’s important to remember that these are just potential future developments. The actual sustainable technologies of 3250 will depend on various factors, including scientific advancements, economic conditions, and societal choices. However, the pursuit of sustainability is likely to remain a central focus for humanity, driving innovation and shaping the technologies of the future.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3250 ?

It seems you’re interested in what sustainable technology might look like far into the future! That’s a really fun and interesting question. While we can’t know for sure, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and where technology might be heading.

Here’s a breakdown of some possibilities for sustainable technology in 3250:

Energy:

Fusion Power: This is a big one! If we crack fusion, it could provide nearly limitless clean energy.
Super Advanced Solar: Think solar panels everywhere, maybe even in space, beaming energy down to Earth. They’d be incredibly efficient and integrated into everything.
Crazy Good Energy Storage: We’d need ways to store all that energy, so imagine batteries or other storage solutions we can’t even conceive of yet.

Environment:

Carbon Capture Masters: We’d have ways to suck CO2 out of the air, maybe even reverse climate change.
Ocean Cleanup Bots: Imagine swarms of robots cleaning up plastic and pollution from the oceans.
Ecosystem Restorers: Technology to bring damaged ecosystems back to life and boost biodiversity.

Resources:

The Ultimate Recycling: Everything gets recycled and reused, almost no waste.
3D Printing Galore: You could print anything you need on demand, reducing waste and transportation.
Vertical Farms Everywhere: Cities would have huge vertical farms growing food locally and sustainably.

Tech:

AI is in Charge (of the Planet): AI would manage energy, transportation, and resources for maximum efficiency.
Nano-Tech Wonders: Tiny machines could do amazing things, maybe even clean up pollution or build things at the molecular level.
Bio-Tech for Good: Using biology to create sustainable materials and energy.

Transportation:

Electric Everything: Electric cars, planes, trains, you name it, all powered by clean energy.
Super Fast Travel: Maybe we’d have hyperloops or other crazy fast ways to get around.
Flying Cars (Finally!): Personal air transportation to reduce traffic.

Buildings:

Self-Sufficient Houses: Buildings that make their own energy, manage their own waste and water.
Green is the New Normal: Buildings designed to have the smallest possible impact on the environment.
Smart Homes on Steroids: Homes that optimize energy use and resource management automatically.

And More:

Living in Space: Maybe we’d have figured out how to live sustainably on other planets.
Taming the Climate: Technologies to actually control the Earth’s climate if needed.
Sustainability is a Way of Life: Everyone would understand and care about sustainability.

It’s a bit like science fiction, but who knows? Maybe some of this will come true. The important thing is that we keep working towards a sustainable future, and that might lead to some pretty amazing technology!

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3250 ?

That’s a great question! It helps us think about the purpose of sustainable technology in the long run. Here’s who would need and benefit from sustainable technology in 3250:

Humanity as a whole: This is the most important. Sustainable technology would be essential for our continued survival and well-being. It would ensure access to clean energy, resources, and a healthy environment for everyone.
Future generations: We have a responsibility to leave a habitable planet for those who come after us. Sustainable technology would be crucial for their survival and prosperity.
Ecosystems: Sustainable technology would help protect and restore natural ecosystems, preserving biodiversity and the essential services they provide.
All living things: Sustainable technology would aim to minimize human impact on the planet, ensuring a healthy environment for all species.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 3250 would be needed by everyone and everything that relies on a healthy planet. It would be a fundamental part of how society functions, ensuring a balance between human needs and the needs of the environment.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3250 ?

This is a really interesting question that gets at the heart of why we should care about sustainability! It’s not just about having cool tech in the future, it’s about ensuring a future at all.

Here’s the thing: Sustainable technology in 3250 is needed now.

Think of it like this:

The seeds of the future are planted today. The choices we make now, the technologies we develop now, will determine what’s possible in 3250. If we don’t start working towards sustainability now, we might not even have a 3250 to worry about!
Sustainability is a journey, not a destination. It’s not something we can just switch on in the future. It requires continuous effort, innovation, and adaptation. The earlier we start, the more time we have to develop and refine the technologies we’ll need.
Problems don’t solve themselves. Climate change, resource depletion, pollution – these are urgent issues that need to be addressed now. The longer we wait, the harder and more costly it will be to solve them.

So, while the full realization of sustainable technology might be in the future, the need for it is immediate. We need to be:

Investing in research and development: Exploring new energy sources, developing better recycling methods, finding ways to clean up pollution, etc.
Adopting sustainable practices: Reducing our consumption, using renewable energy, supporting eco-friendly businesses.
Educating and raising awareness: Helping people understand the importance of sustainability and how they can contribute.

Basically, we need to be building the foundation for that amazing sustainable technology of 3250 right now. It’s not just about the future, it’s about ensuring that future is even possible

COURTESY : Carnegie India

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3250 ?

Sustainable technology in 3250, while perhaps most crucial for the entire planet, would likely be most visibly required and implemented in a few key areas:

Urban Centers: Cities are hubs of population and consumption. Sustainable technologies would be essential for managing resources, energy, waste, and transportation in these densely populated areas. Think vertical farms, smart grids, advanced public transport, and self-sufficient buildings.
Industrial Zones: Manufacturing and industry often have a large environmental footprint. Sustainable technologies would be needed to minimize pollution, recycle materials, and reduce energy consumption in these areas.
Remote and Isolated Communities: Sustainable technologies could provide access to clean energy, clean water, and essential resources for communities far from infrastructure. This could be especially important for space colonization or off-grid settlements.
Degraded Ecosystems: Areas damaged by pollution, deforestation, or other environmental problems would require sustainable technologies for restoration and remediation.
Global Infrastructure: Sustainable technologies would be essential for large-scale systems like energy grids, transportation networks, and communication systems that span across regions and even continents.
Space: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 3250, sustainable technologies would be absolutely critical for establishing and maintaining self-sufficient settlements on other planets or in space habitats.

It’s important to remember that while these are some key locations where sustainable tech would be vital, the need for it would be universal. Sustainable practices and technologies would need to be integrated into every aspect of life, from individual homes to global industries, to ensure a healthy and thriving future.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3250 ?

The “how” of required sustainable technology in 3250 is a complex question, as it involves not just the technologies themselves, but also the systems and societal structures that would support them. Here’s a breakdown of how such technology might be “required” and implemented:

1. Driven by Necessity:

Resource Scarcity: By 3250, if we haven’t already addressed resource depletion, scarcity of essential resources like clean water, certain minerals, or even habitable land would force the development and adoption of sustainable technologies. Necessity is the mother of invention, after all.
Environmental Degradation: Continuing environmental problems like climate change, pollution, and ecosystem collapse would make sustainable solutions absolutely essential for survival. The consequences of inaction would be too severe to ignore.
Population Growth: If the human population continues to grow, sustainable technologies would be needed to provide for everyone without exceeding the planet’s carrying capacity.
Economic Pressures: The long-term costs of unsustainable practices would eventually outweigh the costs of transitioning to sustainable solutions. Economic realities would drive the shift.

2. Through Innovation and Development:

Scientific Breakthroughs: Continued research and development in fields like energy, materials science, biotechnology, and nanotechnology would be crucial for creating the advanced sustainable technologies of the future.
Engineering and Design: Engineers and designers would need to create systems and infrastructure that integrate sustainable technologies seamlessly into society.
Technological Convergence: The combination of different technologies, like AI, nanotechnology, and biotechnology, could lead to innovative solutions we can’t even imagine today.

3. Through Societal and Political Action:

Policy and Regulation: Governments would likely play a role in incentivizing sustainable practices and regulating unsustainable ones. This could involve carbon pricing, subsidies for renewable energy, and regulations on pollution.
International Cooperation: Global cooperation would be essential for addressing global challenges like climate change and resource management.
Education and Awareness: A widespread understanding of the importance of sustainability would be needed to drive societal change and support the adoption of sustainable technologies.
Cultural Shift: A fundamental shift in values and attitudes towards consumption, waste, and the environment would be necessary to create a truly sustainable society.

4. Through Economic and Market Forces:

Market Demand: Consumer demand for sustainable products and services would drive innovation and create a market for sustainable technologies.
Investment and Funding: Investment in sustainable technologies would be essential for their development and deployment.
Circular Economy: A shift towards a circular economy, where resources are reused and recycled, would create new economic opportunities and reduce waste.

In short, the “how” of required sustainable technology in 3250 would be a complex interplay of necessity, innovation, societal action, and economic forces. It would require a fundamental transformation in how we live, work, and interact with the planet.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3250 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 3250, as it’s so far in the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential future developments to illustrate what such a case study might look like.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 3250

Background:

By the early 24th century, despite centuries of effort, the Amazon rainforest had been significantly degraded. Climate change, deforestation, and unsustainable agriculture had taken their toll. While some areas remained relatively intact, much of the rainforest was fragmented and struggling to recover. Recognizing the Amazon’s crucial role in global climate regulation and biodiversity, the Global Sustainability Council (GSC), a governing body established in the late 24th century, initiated the “Amazon Regeneration Project” in 3200.

The Challenge:

The project faced several key challenges:

Restoring Biodiversity: Reintroducing lost species and rebuilding complex ecological relationships.
Reversing Soil Degradation: Restoring fertility to depleted soils and preventing erosion.
Managing Water Resources: Ensuring adequate water availability in a changing climate.
Engaging Local Communities: Empowering indigenous populations and incorporating their traditional knowledge.
Combating Climate Change: Addressing the root causes of climate change to prevent further damage.

The Solution:

The Amazon Regeneration Project employed a multi-faceted approach, utilizing a range of advanced sustainable technologies:

AI-Powered Ecosystem Management: Sophisticated AI systems analyzed vast amounts of data from sensors and satellites to monitor the health of the rainforest and guide restoration efforts. These systems could predict and respond to threats like wildfires and disease outbreaks in real-time.
Nanotechnology for Soil Remediation: Nanobots were deployed to repair damaged soil structures, deliver nutrients, and remove pollutants.
Biotechnology for Species Restoration: Advanced gene editing techniques were used to revive extinct or endangered species and enhance the resilience of existing ones.
Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Large-scale carbon capture facilities were built to remove CO2 from the atmosphere and mitigate the effects of climate change.
Sustainable Agriculture: Vertical farms and other sustainable agricultural technologies were implemented to provide food for local communities without further deforestation.
Renewable Energy Infrastructure: Solar and other renewable energy sources were used to power the project and support local communities.
Decentralized Water Management: Advanced filtration and water harvesting technologies ensured access to clean water for both the ecosystem and human populations.
Community-Based Conservation: Indigenous communities were given a central role in the project, utilizing their traditional knowledge and practices to manage and protect the rainforest.

Results and Impact:

By 3250, the Amazon Regeneration Project had achieved remarkable success. Vast areas of the rainforest had been restored, biodiversity had rebounded, and the Amazon’s crucial role in global climate regulation had been strengthened. The project served as a model for ecosystem restoration efforts around the world, demonstrating the power of sustainable technology to heal a damaged planet.

Lessons Learned:

The Amazon Regeneration Project highlighted the importance of:

Long-term vision: Sustainable solutions often require long-term commitment and investment.
Interdisciplinary collaboration: Addressing complex challenges like ecosystem restoration requires expertise from a wide range of fields.
Technological innovation: Advanced technologies are essential for developing sustainable solutions.
Community engagement: Empowering local communities is crucial for the success of any sustainability initiative.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology in 3250 might be used to address a major environmental challenge. While the specific technologies and approaches may differ, the underlying principles of sustainability – protecting the environment, conserving resources, and promoting social equity – would remain the same

.COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3250 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3250: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3250, a future vastly different from our own. It posits that by this distant era, humanity will have achieved a harmonious balance with the planet through radical advancements in science, engineering, and societal structures. This paper outlines potential key technological areas, societal shifts, and the philosophical underpinnings that would be necessary to achieve true sustainability across such a vast timescale. It serves as a speculative exploration, aiming to inspire innovation and long-term thinking in the pursuit of a thriving future for humanity and the Earth.

1. Introduction: The Long View of Sustainability

Sustainability is not a static goal, but a continuous process of adaptation and improvement. By 3250, it is envisioned that sustainability will be deeply ingrained in every facet of human civilization. This will necessitate not just technological innovation, but also a profound shift in human consciousness, prioritizing ecological balance and long-term well-being over short-term gains.

2. Core Technological Domains:

Energy: Fusion power is anticipated to be the dominant energy source, providing clean and abundant energy for all. Advanced solar technologies, potentially space-based, will supplement fusion, creating a highly resilient and distributed energy network. Energy storage solutions will be revolutionized, allowing for seamless integration of intermittent renewable sources.
Environment: Advanced carbon capture and utilization technologies will not only remove existing atmospheric CO2 but also transform it into valuable resources. Nanotechnology will play a critical role in environmental remediation, cleaning up pollution at a molecular level. Ecosystem restoration will be a highly advanced science, with AI-powered systems monitoring and managing the health of the planet’s ecosystems.
Resource Management: A true circular economy will be realized, with near-total recycling and reuse of all materials. 3D printing and advanced manufacturing techniques will enable on-demand production, minimizing waste and resource consumption. Vertical farming and other sustainable agriculture practices will ensure food security for a growing population while minimizing environmental impact.
Information and Communication: AI will be deeply integrated into all aspects of life, managing infrastructure, optimizing resource allocation, and facilitating communication. Quantum computing may offer unprecedented processing power, enabling simulations and analyses of complex systems, further aiding in environmental management and resource optimization.
Transportation: Personal and public transportation will be entirely electric and highly efficient. Advanced air and space travel will be commonplace, powered by sustainable fuels and propulsion systems. Hyperloop systems and other high-speed ground transportation will connect cities and regions seamlessly.
Biotechnology: Biotechnology will play a crucial role in sustainable agriculture, materials science, and medicine. Genetically engineered crops will be more resilient and require fewer resources. Biomaterials will replace traditional materials in many applications, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

3. Societal and Philosophical Shifts:

Global Cooperation: Effective global governance structures will be in place, facilitating international cooperation on environmental issues and resource management.
Sustainable Consumption: A shift in values will prioritize quality over quantity, reducing the emphasis on material possessions.
Ecological Consciousness: A deep understanding and respect for the natural world will be ingrained in human culture.
Technological Ethics: Strict ethical guidelines will govern the development and use of advanced technologies, ensuring they are used for the benefit of humanity and the planet.

4. Challenges and Opportunities:

Maintaining Equilibrium: Balancing technological advancement with ecological preservation will be an ongoing challenge.
Adapting to Change: Humanity will need to be adaptable and resilient in the face of unforeseen environmental changes.
Ensuring Equity: Access to sustainable technologies and resources must be equitable for all members of society.

5. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 3250 presented in this white paper is ambitious, but achievable. It requires a long-term perspective, a commitment to innovation, and a fundamental shift in human values. By embracing sustainability as a core principle, humanity can create a future where both civilization and the natural world thrive. This vision should serve as a guiding star, inspiring us to take action today to build a better tomorrow.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3250 ?

It’s exciting to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3250! Here are some possibilities, keeping in mind that this is speculative and based on current trends:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

Advanced 3D Printing: Imagine entire factories built around massive, highly precise 3D printers that can create anything from complex machinery to everyday goods on demand, using recycled or bio-based materials. Waste would be drastically reduced, and production could be localized, minimizing transportation needs.
Nanofactories: Tiny, self-replicating machines could assemble products at the molecular level, creating materials with incredible properties or even building entire structures. This could revolutionize manufacturing, making it incredibly efficient and resource-conscious.
AI-Powered Optimization: AI systems would manage every aspect of production, from resource allocation to process optimization, ensuring maximum efficiency and minimal waste. Factories would be highly automated, with robots performing most tasks.

2. Energy & Resource Management:

Fusion-Powered Industries: Industries would have access to abundant, clean energy from fusion reactors, powering their operations sustainably.
Closed-Loop Systems: Factories would operate on closed-loop systems, where all waste is recycled and reused within the production process. Resources would be carefully managed and conserved.
Atmospheric Resource Extraction: Advanced technologies might allow industries to extract resources directly from the atmosphere, such as carbon for manufacturing or rare elements for specialized applications.

3. Infrastructure & Construction:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be made from materials that can self-repair damage, extending their lifespan and reducing the need for maintenance.
Smart Infrastructure: AI-powered systems would monitor and manage infrastructure, optimizing energy use, predicting maintenance needs, and preventing failures.
Eco-Cities: Entire cities would be designed with sustainability in mind, incorporating green spaces, renewable energy sources, and efficient transportation systems.

4. Transportation & Logistics:

Sustainable Aviation: Air travel would be powered by sustainable fuels, reducing emissions and minimizing environmental impact.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems would transport goods and people quickly and efficiently between cities, reducing reliance on traditional transportation methods.
Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles would optimize traffic flow and reduce energy consumption in logistics and transportation.

5. Agriculture & Food Production:

Vertical Farms: Large-scale vertical farms in urban areas would produce food locally, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems would monitor crops and soil conditions, optimizing resource use and maximizing yields while minimizing environmental impact.
Lab-Grown Food: Advanced biotechnology could be used to produce meat and other food products in labs, reducing the need for traditional agriculture and its associated environmental issues.

6. Mining & Resource Extraction:

Asteroid Mining: If humanity has expanded into space, asteroid mining could provide access to valuable resources without damaging Earth’s ecosystems.
Sustainable Mining Practices: Advanced technologies would be used to minimize the environmental impact of mining operations on Earth, restoring mined areas and preventing pollution.

7. Waste Management & Recycling:

Advanced Recycling: Highly efficient recycling systems would break down waste materials into their basic components, allowing them to be reused in manufacturing.
Waste-to-Energy: Technologies would convert waste into energy, reducing landfill waste and providing a source of renewable energy.

It’s important to remember that these are just potential examples. The actual industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3250 will depend on the specific challenges and opportunities that humanity faces at that time. However, the underlying principles of sustainability – minimizing environmental impact, conserving resources, and promoting social equity – will likely remain central to industrial development in the future.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3250 ?

It’s really cool to think about the kind of research and development that would be happening to create sustainable technology for 3250! Here’s a breakdown of some key areas:

1. Energy:

Fusion Energy Mastery: Researchers would be working on perfecting fusion reactor designs, making them smaller, more efficient, and safer. They’d also be figuring out how to integrate fusion seamlessly into existing energy grids.
Exotic Energy Sources: Scientists might be exploring even more futuristic energy sources, maybe harnessing zero-point energy or developing entirely new ways to generate power that we can’t even imagine yet.
Space-Based Solar Superfarms: R&D would focus on building and maintaining massive solar arrays in space, and then safely and efficiently beaming that energy back down to Earth.

2. Environment:

Advanced Geoengineering: Researchers might be developing sophisticated geoengineering techniques to counteract climate change, like precisely manipulating weather patterns or safely removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
Ecosystem Restoration 2.0: Scientists would be studying how to restore ecosystems at a very deep level, understanding the complex interactions between species and their environment to bring damaged areas back to life.
Planetary Health Monitoring: A global network of sensors and AI systems would be constantly monitoring the health of the planet, detecting potential problems early on and helping to prevent environmental disasters.

3. Resources:

Material Science Breakthroughs: Researchers would be creating new materials with incredible properties, like self-healing plastics or super-strong, lightweight composites.
Universal Recycling: Scientists would be developing ways to recycle absolutely everything, breaking down materials into their basic building blocks and reusing them endlessly.
Resource Extraction from Space: If humanity has expanded into space, R&D would focus on safely and sustainably mining resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies.

4. Technology:

Artificial Superintelligence: Researchers would be pushing the boundaries of AI, developing systems that can solve complex problems, manage resources efficiently, and even make scientific discoveries on their own.
Nanotechnology Mastery: Scientists would be learning how to control matter at the atomic level, creating tiny machines that can build anything, clean up pollution, or even repair damaged tissues in the human body.
Biotechnology Revolution: Researchers would be using biotechnology to create new fuels, materials, and medicines, and even to enhance human capabilities.

5. Space Exploration & Colonization:

Self-Sustaining Space Habitats: R&D would focus on creating closed-loop systems for space colonies, where resources are recycled and reused indefinitely.¹ 1. Advancements in Space Colonization Research – Falcon Scientific Editing falconediting.com
Interstellar Travel: Scientists might be exploring the possibilities of faster-than-light travel or developing new propulsion systems to reach distant stars.
Terraforming: Researchers might be studying how to make other planets habitable for humans, potentially through large-scale environmental modification.

How would this R&D happen?

Global Collaboration: Massive international research projects would bring together the best minds from around the world.
Interdisciplinary Approach: Scientists from different fields would work together, combining their knowledge and expertise to solve complex problems.
Advanced Simulation: Powerful computers would be used to simulate complex systems and test new technologies before they are deployed in the real world.
Long-Term Vision: Governments and private organizations would be willing to invest in long-term research projects, even if the payoff is decades or centuries away.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential research and development of sustainable technology in 3250. The actual direction of research will depend on the challenges and opportunities that humanity faces in the future. But one thing is certain: the pursuit of sustainability will be a major driving force behind scientific and technological innovation for centuries to come.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.