Sustainable Technology of 3240

74 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3240 ?

Sustainable technology in 3240 will be a game-changer, impacting how we live and interact with the planet. Here’s a glimpse into what it might look like:

1. Energy:

Renewable Energy Dominance: Solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal will be highly efficient and widely used, powering homes, industries, and transportation.
Advanced Energy Storage: Batteries, pumped hydro, and other innovative storage solutions will ensure a stable and reliable energy supply, even when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing.

2. Resource Management:

Circular Economy in Action: Products will be designed for disassembly, reuse, and recycling. Waste will be minimized through innovative materials and efficient recycling processes.
Smart Resource Management: Smart grids, water management systems, and waste management solutions will optimize resource use in cities and industries.

3. Food and Agriculture:

Precision Agriculture: Sensors, AI, and automation will optimize resource use in farming, reducing environmental impact and increasing yields.
Alternative Food Sources: Vertical farming and lab-grown meat may become more common, providing sustainable ways to feed a growing population.

4. Transportation:

Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Electric vehicles will dominate the roads, and self-driving technology will improve safety and efficiency.
Alternative Fuels: Hydrogen and biofuels may play a larger role in transportation, further reducing emissions.

5. Environment:

Carbon Capture and Storage: Technologies to capture CO2 from industrial processes and the atmosphere will be crucial for mitigating climate change.
Biotechnology for Sustainability: Advancements in genetic engineering and synthetic biology may lead to sustainable solutions in various sectors, such as biofuels, bioplastics, and bioremediation.

6. Digital World:

Green Computing: Energy-efficient hardware, software, and data centers will reduce the environmental footprint of the digital world.

Overall, sustainable technology in 3240 will be characterized by:

Interconnectedness: Technologies will be integrated across sectors to create holistic solutions.
Efficiency: Resource use will be optimized to minimize waste and environmental impact.
Resilience: Systems will be designed to withstand the impacts of climate change and other challenges.
Innovation: Continuous advancements in technology will drive further progress towards sustainability.

It’s important to remember that this is just a vision of what sustainable technology in 3240might look like. The actual future will depend on the choices we make today. By investing in research, development, and deployment of sustainable technologies, we can create a world that is both prosperous and environmentally responsible.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3240 ?

Sustainable technology in 3240 is not just needed by a select few; it’s a necessity for everyone on the planet. Here’s a breakdown of who specifically needs it and why:

Governments: They need sustainable technology to meet climate goals, improve resource management, and create resilient infrastructure. This ensures a healthy environment and a stable economy for their citizens.
Businesses: Companies need sustainable technology to reduce their environmental footprint, improve efficiency, and meet growing consumer demand for eco-friendly products and services. This leads to long-term profitability and a positive brand image.
Individuals: We all need sustainable technology to reduce our impact on the planet, access clean energy and resources, and live healthier lives. This includes using sustainable transportation, consuming less, and making informed choices about the products we buy.
Developing Nations: These countries need sustainable technology to leapfrog traditional, polluting development models and build sustainable economies from the ground up. This can improve living standards and reduce inequality.
Future Generations: They need sustainable technology to inherit a healthy planet with clean air, water, and resources. This is about ensuring a livable future for all.

Essentially, everyone has a stake in sustainable technology in 3240. It’s not just about environmentalism; it’s about ensuring a prosperous, equitable, and healthy future for all.

Here’s why it’s so crucial:

Climate Change Mitigation: Sustainable technologies are essential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit the impacts of climate change.
Resource Scarcity: As the global population grows, we need sustainable technologies to manage resources efficiently and avoid shortages of water, food, and raw materials.
Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and other forms of environmental degradation threaten human health and well-being. Sustainable technologies can help to reverse these trends.
Economic Development: Sustainable technologies can drive innovation, create new jobs, and boost economic growth in a way that is environmentally responsible.

In conclusion, the need for sustainable technology in 3240 is universal. It’s a collective responsibility to develop and implement these technologies to create a better future for all.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3240 ?

The need for sustainable technology isn’t something that suddenly appears 3240. It’s a growing and urgent requirement that’s with us now and becomes increasingly critical as we approach 3240. Here’s a timeline of why and when sustainable technology is required:3240The need for sustainable technology isn’t something that suddenly appears in 3240. It’s a growing and urgent requirement that’s with us now and becomes increasingly critical as we approach 3240. Here’s a timeline of why and when sustainable technology is required:

Now (Present):

Addressing Climate Change: We are already experiencing the impacts of climate change, and sustainable technologies are needed now to mitigate these effects. This includes transitioning to renewable energy, improving energy efficiency, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Resource Depletion: Many resources are becoming scarce, and sustainable technologies are needed now to use resources more efficiently and find alternatives. This includes water conservation, sustainable agriculture, and circular economy practices.
Environmental Degradation: Pollution and other forms of environmental degradation are harming human health and ecosystems. Sustainable technologies are needed now to reduce pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.

In the Near Future (Next 5-10 years):

Scaling Up Solutions: We need to scale up existing sustainable technologies and develop new ones to meet the growing demand for clean energy, sustainable food production, and other essential needs.
Infrastructure Development: Investments in sustainable infrastructure, such as smart grids and green transportation systems, are needed in the near future to support the transition to a sustainable economy.
Policy and Regulation: Governments need to implement policies and regulations that incentivize the adoption of sustainable technologies and discourage unsustainable practices.

By 3240 and Beyond:

Systemic Change: By 3240, we need to have made significant progress in transitioning to a sustainable society. This requires widespread adoption of sustainable technologies across all sectors, from energy and transportation to agriculture and manufacturing.
Resilience: Sustainable technologies will be crucial for building resilient communities that can withstand the impacts of climate change and other challenges.
Long-Term Sustainability: The goal is not just to survive but to thrive. Sustainable technologies are essential for ensuring a healthy planet and a prosperous future for generations to come.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology is not a future problem; it’s a present imperative. The sooner we embrace and implement these technologies, the better our chances of creating a sustainable future for all.

COURTESY : Carnegie India

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3240 ?

That’s a great question! Sustainable technology in 3240 isn’t confined to one place; it’s needed everywhere. Here’s a breakdown of where it’s most crucial:

1. Cities:

Urban Centers: With a growing global population, cities need sustainable technology to manage resources efficiently, reduce pollution, and create livable environments. This includes smart grids, green buildings, sustainable transportation, and waste management solutions.
Infrastructure: Sustainable infrastructure is essential for cities to function efficiently and resiliently. This includes sustainable transportation networks, renewable energy systems, and water management solutions.

2. Rural Areas:

Agriculture: Sustainable agriculture is crucial for feeding a growing population while minimizing environmental impact. This includes precision farming, water conservation, and sustainable land management practices.
Energy Access: Sustainable technology can provide access to clean energy in rural areas, improving living standards and supporting economic development.

3. Industries:

Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing practices are needed to reduce resource use, minimize waste, and reduce pollution. This includes circular economy approaches, energy-efficient processes, and sustainable materials.
Energy Sector: The energy sector needs to transition to renewable energy sources and develop energy storage solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and ensure a reliable energy supply.

4. Homes and Buildings:

Residential Buildings: Sustainable building design, energy-efficient appliances, and smart home technologies can reduce energy consumption and improve comfort in homes.
Commercial Buildings: Green building practices, energy management systems, and sustainable materials can reduce the environmental footprint of commercial buildings.

5. Transportation:

Road Transport: Electric vehicles, autonomous driving, and alternative fuels are needed to reduce emissions and improve efficiency in road transportation.
Aviation and Shipping: Sustainable aviation fuels and more efficient shipping technologies are needed to reduce the environmental impact of these sectors.

6. Global Context:

Developing Nations: Sustainable technology is crucial for developing nations to build sustainable economies and improve living standards without replicating the environmental mistakes of the past.
International Cooperation: Collaboration between countries is essential to develop and deploy sustainable technologies on a global scale.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 3240 is needed everywhere to address the interconnected challenges of climate change, resource scarcity, and environmental degradation. It’s a global imperative that requires action at all levels, from individuals to governments and industries.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3240 ?

You’re asking a crucial question: How do we actually achieve sustainable technology by 3240? It’s not just about having the ideas, but putting them into action. Here’s a breakdown of the key pathways:

1. Research and Development:

Continued Innovation: We need continuous investment in research and development to create new sustainable technologies and improve existing ones. This includes areas like renewable energy, energy storage, advanced materials, and biotechnology.
Collaboration: Collaboration between universities, research institutions, and industry is essential to accelerate the development and commercialization of sustainable technologies.

2. Policy and Regulation:

Incentives: Governments need to create policies that incentivize the adoption of sustainable technologies, such as tax breaks, subsidies, and carbon pricing.
Regulations: Regulations are needed to phase out unsustainable practices and ensure that new technologies are environmentally sound.
International Agreements: Global cooperation is essential to address climate change and other environmental challenges.

3. Investment and Finance:

Green Finance: We need to mobilize significant investments in sustainable technologies and infrastructure. This includes green bonds, impact investing, and other innovative financing mechanisms.
Risk Mitigation: Governments and financial institutions need to help mitigate the risks associated with investing in sustainable technologies, particularly in the early stages of development.

4. Education and Awareness:

Public Awareness: Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainable technology is crucial to drive demand for eco-friendly products and services.
Education and Training: We need to educate and train the next generation of engineers, scientists, and policymakers who will develop and implement sustainable technologies.

5. Market Transformation:

Consumer Demand: Creating consumer demand for sustainable products and services is essential to drive market transformation. This can be achieved through education, labeling programs, and other initiatives.
Corporate Leadership: Businesses need to take a leadership role in adopting sustainable technologies and practices. This includes setting ambitious sustainability targets, investing in green technologies, and engaging with their supply chains.

6. International Cooperation:

Technology Transfer: Developed countries need to support developing countries in adopting sustainable technologies through technology transfer and capacity building.
Joint Research: International collaboration on research and development can accelerate the development of sustainable technologies.

7. Systems Thinking:

Integrated Solutions: We need to adopt a systems thinking approach to sustainability, recognizing that different sectors and technologies are interconnected. This means developing integrated solutions that address multiple challenges simultaneously.

Achieving sustainable technology by 3240 requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including governments, businesses, individuals, and researchers. By working together, we can create a future where technology is used to protect the planet and ensure a prosperous future for all. Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3240 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific “case study” of sustainable technology in 3240 because, well, it hasn’t happened yet! But, we can look at emerging trends and projects that give us a strong indication of what’s to come. Here’s an example of a potential case study, drawing from current advancements:

Case Study: The “Zero Waste City” of Copenhagen 3240

Background: Copenhagen has long been a leader in sustainability. By 3240, imagine they’ve taken it to the next level, becoming a true “Zero Waste City.”

Sustainable Technologies in Action:

Advanced Recycling & Resource Recovery: Highly efficient systems sort and process all waste, with minimal landfill. AI-powered sorting, chemical recycling, and biowaste conversion into energy are commonplace.
Circular Economy Integration: Products are designed for disassembly and reuse. Local “material hubs” facilitate sharing and repurposing of resources. Construction uses recycled and bio-based materials.
Smart Energy Grid: A fully integrated smart grid optimizes energy distribution, with renewables (wind, solar, geothermal) providing the majority. Buildings generate and share energy, minimizing waste.
Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles dominate, with autonomous driving and optimized public transport. Cycling infrastructure is world-class, and car ownership is minimal.
Urban Farming & Food Systems: Vertical farms and rooftop gardens provide fresh produce. Food waste is drastically reduced through efficient systems and community initiatives.
Water Management: Smart water systems minimize leaks and optimize usage. Rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling are integrated into buildings.

Outcomes:

Near-Zero Waste: Landfills are virtually eliminated, with resources continuously cycled.
Carbon Neutrality: The city achieves net-zero emissions, contributing significantly to climate goals.
Improved Air & Water Quality: Pollution is drastically reduced, creating a healthier environment.
Thriving Economy: Green jobs and innovation drive economic growth.
Enhanced Quality of Life: Residents enjoy a sustainable, healthy, and vibrant city.

Key Factors:

Long-term Vision & Policy: Copenhagen set ambitious goals early on and implemented supportive policies.
Technological Innovation: Continuous investment in R&D drove advancements in key areas.
Public Engagement: Citizens were actively involved in the transition, adopting sustainable lifestyles.
Collaboration: Businesses, researchers, and government worked together towards the shared vision.

Lessons Learned:

Early action is crucial: Starting now is essential to achieve significant change by 3240.
Holistic approach: Sustainable technology must be integrated across all sectors.
Collaboration is key: Achieving sustainability requires a collective effort.

This is just one example, of course. Sustainable technology in 3240 will likely involve a diverse range of solutions tailored to specific contexts. But, by looking at current trends and envisioning potential futures, we can better understand the path towards a sustainable world.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3240 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3240: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Executive Summary:

The year 3240 represents a critical juncture in humanity’s pursuit of sustainability. This white paper explores the landscape of sustainable technologies expected to shape our world by 3240, outlining key advancements, challenges, and opportunities. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of technological innovation, policy, investment, and societal shifts in achieving a truly sustainable future. The paper argues that proactive measures taken today are crucial to realizing the full potential of sustainable technologies and mitigating the risks of environmental degradation and resource scarcity.

1. Introduction:

The global challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental pollution demand urgent and transformative solutions. Sustainable technology, encompassing innovations that minimize environmental impact and promote resource efficiency, is at the heart of this transformation. This paper envisions the landscape of sustainable technology in 3240, building upon current trends and projecting future advancements across key sectors.

2. Key Areas of Sustainable Technology in 3240:

2.1 Renewable Energy Dominance: Solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal energy will be highly efficient and cost-competitive, forming the backbone of global energy systems. Advanced energy storage solutions, including next-generation batteries, pumped hydro, and thermal storage, will ensure grid stability and reliability.
2.2 Circular Economy Advancements: Technologies enabling the circular economy will be widely adopted. This includes innovative materials designed for disassembly and reuse, advanced recycling processes, and product lifecycle management systems that minimize waste.
2.3 Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems: Precision agriculture utilizing AI, sensors, and automation will optimize resource use in farming. Vertical farming, cellular agriculture, and alternative protein sources will contribute to food security and reduce the environmental footprint of food production.
2.4 Green Transportation Revolution: Electric vehicles will dominate personal transportation, complemented by autonomous driving technologies and smart traffic management systems. Sustainable aviation fuels and efficient shipping technologies will reduce emissions in long-distance travel.
2.5 Carbon Capture and Utilization/Storage (CCUS): Advanced CCUS technologies will capture CO2 emissions from industrial processes and even the atmosphere, either storing them permanently or utilizing them to create valuable products.
2.6 Smart Cities and Infrastructure: Smart city technologies will optimize resource management in urban environments. This includes smart grids, water management systems, waste management solutions, and green building technologies.
2.7 Biotechnology for Sustainability: Advancements in genetic engineering and synthetic biology will offer sustainable solutions in various sectors, including biofuels, bioplastics, bioremediation, and sustainable materials.
2.8 Green Computing and AI: Energy-efficient hardware, software, and data centers, along with AI-powered optimization, will minimize the environmental impact of the digital world.

3. Challenges and Opportunities:

3.1 Technological Barriers: Continued research and development are crucial to overcome technological hurdles and improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of sustainable technologies.
3.2 Policy and Regulatory Frameworks: Supportive policies and regulations are needed to incentivize the adoption of sustainable technologies and create a level playing field for green innovation.
3.3 Investment and Financing: Mobilizing significant investments in sustainable technology research, development, and deployment is essential.
3.4 Societal Acceptance and Behavioral Change: Public awareness and engagement are crucial to drive demand for sustainable products and services and encourage sustainable lifestyles.
3.5 Global Collaboration: International cooperation on research, technology transfer, and policy harmonization is essential to address global sustainability challenges.

4. Recommendations:

4.1 Prioritize Research and Development: Invest heavily in research and development across all areas of sustainable technology.
4.2 Develop Supportive Policies: Implement policies that incentivize sustainable practices and create a favorable environment for green innovation.
4.3 Mobilize Green Finance: Scale up investments in sustainable technologies and infrastructure through green bonds, impact investing, and other mechanisms.
4.4 Foster Public Engagement: Raise public awareness about the importance of sustainability and encourage sustainable consumption patterns.
4.5 Promote International Collaboration: Strengthen international cooperation on research, technology transfer, and policy coordination.

5. Conclusion:

The transition to a sustainable future by 3240 requires a concerted and collaborative effort from governments, businesses, researchers, and individuals. By embracing sustainable technologies, fostering innovation, and implementing supportive policies, we can create a world where economic prosperity and environmental stewardship go hand in hand. The choices we make today will determine the sustainability of our future.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3240 ?

You’re right to focus on the practical side! Sustainable technology in 3240 won’t just be in labs; it’ll be driving industries. Here’s how:

1. Manufacturing:

Circular Production: Factories will be designed for closed-loop systems. Materials are continuously reused, minimizing waste and reliance on virgin resources. AI-powered systems optimize production for minimal energy and resource consumption.
Sustainable Materials: Bio-based plastics, advanced composites, and recycled materials become the norm. Manufacturing processes minimize pollution and use renewable energy sources.
Smart Factories: Sensors, AI, and automation optimize production processes, reducing waste and energy use. Real-time data allows for predictive maintenance, minimizing downtime and resource waste.

2. Energy:

Renewable Integration: Industries run primarily on renewable energy (solar, wind, geothermal). Smart grids manage energy flow, ensuring reliability and efficiency.
Energy Storage: Large-scale energy storage solutions (advanced batteries, pumped hydro) are integrated into industrial facilities, ensuring continuous operation even when renewable sources fluctuate.
Carbon Capture & Utilization: Industries with unavoidable emissions (like cement production) use CCUS technology to capture CO2 and either store it or use it to create new products.

3. Agriculture:

Precision Farming: Sensors, drones, and AI guide farming practices, optimizing water and fertilizer use, reducing environmental impact and increasing yields.
Vertical Farming: Urban and indoor vertical farms provide fresh produce, reducing transportation needs and land use.
Sustainable Food Processing: Food processing facilities minimize waste, use renewable energy, and adopt circular economy principles.

4. Construction:

Green Buildings: Buildings are designed for energy efficiency, using sustainable materials and incorporating renewable energy systems.
Modular Construction: Prefabricated, modular construction reduces waste and speeds up building processes.
Smart Infrastructure: Bridges, roads, and other infrastructure are embedded with sensors that monitor their condition and optimize maintenance, extending their lifespan and reducing resource use.

5. Transportation:

Electric Fleets: Companies operate electric vehicle fleets for logistics and transportation, reducing emissions and fuel costs.
Sustainable Aviation: Airlines use sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) and invest in more efficient aircraft to reduce their environmental footprint.
Green Shipping: Shipping companies adopt more efficient vessels, use alternative fuels, and optimize routes to reduce emissions.

6. Chemicals & Materials:

Bio-based Chemicals: Industries increasingly use bio-based feedstocks to produce chemicals and materials, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
Green Chemistry: Chemical processes are designed to minimize waste and use less hazardous substances.
Advanced Materials: Development of new, sustainable materials with unique properties (e.g., lightweight, strong, biodegradable) opens up new possibilities for various industries.

Overall Impact:

Reduced Environmental Footprint: Industries significantly reduce their emissions, waste, and resource consumption.
Increased Efficiency: Sustainable technologies often lead to improved efficiency and cost savings.
New Business Opportunities: Sustainable technologies create new markets and business opportunities in areas like renewable energy, recycling, and green materials.
Enhanced Competitiveness: Companies that adopt sustainable technologies gain a competitive advantage by meeting growing consumer demand for eco-friendly products and services.

It’s important to remember that the industrial application of sustainable technology in 3240 will be driven by a combination of factors, including technological advancements, government policies, consumer demand, and corporate leadership. By embracing sustainable practices, industries can not only reduce their environmental impact but also create a more prosperous and sustainable future

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3240 ?

You’re spot on! Research and development (R&D) is the engine that will drive the sustainable technologies of 3240. Here’s a look at some key areas of focus:

1. Advanced Materials:

Bio-based Materials: Developing new materials from renewable resources (plants, algae, etc.) to replace traditional plastics and other materials derived from fossil fuels.
Biodegradable Materials: Creating materials that break down naturally in the environment, reducing plastic waste and pollution.
High-Performance Materials: Designing materials with enhanced properties (lightweight, strong, durable) for use in various applications, from transportation to construction.
Smart Materials: Developing materials that can respond to their environment (e.g., change color, self-heal) for use in sensors, adaptive buildings, and other applications.

2. Energy:

Next-Generation Solar: Researching new solar cell technologies (perovskite, organic) to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
Advanced Energy Storage: Developing more efficient and cost-effective energy storage solutions (batteries, pumped hydro, thermal storage) to ensure grid stability and enable greater use of renewable energy.
Fusion Energy: Continuing research into fusion energy as a potential source of clean, abundant energy.
Hydrogen Technologies: Developing efficient and cost-effective methods for producing, storing, and utilizing hydrogen as a clean fuel.

3. Agriculture and Food:

Precision Agriculture: Developing advanced sensors, AI, and robotics for precision farming to optimize resource use (water, fertilizer) and reduce environmental impact.
Vertical Farming: Improving the efficiency and scalability of vertical farming systems to increase food production in urban areas and reduce land use.
Cellular Agriculture: Researching and developing technologies for producing meat and other animal products from cell cultures, reducing the environmental impact of traditional livestock farming.
Sustainable Food Packaging: Developing biodegradable and compostable food packaging materials to reduce waste and pollution.

4. Environment:

Carbon Capture and Utilization/Storage (CCUS): Improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of CCUS technologies to capture CO2 emissions from industrial processes and the atmosphere.
Bioremediation: Developing technologies that use microorganisms to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.
Water Purification: Researching new methods for purifying water and making it safe for drinking, particularly in areas with limited access to clean water.
Climate Modeling: Improving climate models to better understand the impacts of climate change and develop effective mitigation strategies.

5. Computing and AI:

Green Computing: Developing more energy-efficient hardware and software to reduce the environmental footprint of the digital world.
AI for Sustainability: Utilizing AI to optimize resource use in various sectors, from energy and transportation to agriculture and manufacturing.
Quantum Computing: Exploring the potential of quantum computing to solve complex problems related to sustainability, such as materials discovery and climate modeling.

Key Research Approaches:

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, and other experts from different fields to address complex sustainability challenges.
Systems Thinking: Adopting a holistic approach to research, recognizing that different sectors and technologies are interconnected.
Open Innovation: Encouraging collaboration between universities, research institutions, and industry to accelerate the development and commercialization of sustainable technologies.
Global Collaboration: Strengthening international cooperation on research and development to address global sustainability challenges.

By prioritizing research and development in these key areas, we can pave the way for the sustainable technologies that will shape our world in 3240 and beyond.Sources and related content

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Sustainable Technology of 3240 ?

References

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply