Sustainable Technology of 3230

Leave a Comment / Blog / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 3230 ?

It appears you’re asking about sustainable technology related to the number 3230. This could refer to a few things:

  • ARGUNA® 3230: This is an alkaline, cyanide-free silver electrolyte used for coating materials with silver. It’s considered sustainable because it doesn’t contain toxic cyanide compounds, making it safer for the environment and workers.  
  • Charcofab – Fabric Panels: 3230: These are interior design panels made from charcoal boards and upcycled textile residues. They are a sustainable option for wall décor as they utilize recycled materials.  
  • EU/ENVS 3230: Urban Habitats and Restoration Ecology: This is a university course that explores the restoration of urban habitats. It focuses on ecological restoration, which is inherently sustainable as it aims to improve the health and functioning of ecosystems.  
  • ICAR’s Sustainable Rice Farming Practices: The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) has promoted sustainable rice farming practices in the Kuttanad region, including optimizing seed use, site-specific nutrient management, and eco-friendly pest control. These practices aim to reduce environmental impact and improve the livelihoods of farmers.
  • ENVS:3230 Sustainable Landscapes: This is a university course where students participate in the ecological restoration of a prairie, learning about ecological restoration principles and gaining practical skills.  

It’s important to note that sustainability is a broad concept, and what makes something “sustainable” can depend on the specific context. However, in general, sustainable technologies and practices aim to minimize environmental impact, conserve resources, and promote social and economic well-being.  

If you can provide more context about what you’re interested in, I can give you more specific information about sustainable technologies related to the number 3230.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3230 ?

It seems you’re interested in how the number 3230 relates to sustainable technology. While “3230” itself isn’t a specific technology, it can be connected to sustainability in a few ways:

1. ARGUNA® 3230: This is a cyanide-free silver electrolyte used for coating materials. It’s a sustainable technology because it avoids the use of toxic cyanide, making it safer for the environment and workers. This is particularly important in industries like medical technology where cyanide-free processes are often required.  

2. Charcofab – Fabric Panels: 3230: These are interior design panels made from charcoal boards and upcycled textile residues. They represent a sustainable approach to interior design by utilizing recycled materials and reducing waste.  

3. Academic Connections: * EU/ENVS 3230: Urban Habitats and Restoration Ecology: This university course focuses on ecological restoration in urban environments, which is a key aspect of sustainability. * ENVS:3230 Sustainable Landscapes: This course involves hands-on ecological restoration of a prairie, teaching students about sustainability through practical experience.  

4. Sustainable Agriculture: * ICAR’s Sustainable Rice Farming Practices: The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) has promoted sustainable rice farming practices in the Kuttanad region, focusing on optimizing resource use and minimizing environmental impact.

Key Takeaways:

  • Sustainability is broad: It encompasses environmental, social, and economic aspects.  
  • “3230” can be linked to various sustainable technologies and practices: From safer industrial processes to recycled materials in design and ecological restoration efforts.
  • Context matters: The specific meaning of “sustainable technology of 3230” depends on the context in which it’s used.

If you have a specific area of interest within sustainability (e.g., manufacturing, agriculture, education), I can provide more tailored information about how “3230” might be relevant.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3230 ?

It’s tricky to pinpoint exactly who “requires” sustainable technology of 3230 without knowing the specific technology you’re thinking of. However, let’s break down the potential applications and who might benefit:

1. ARGUNA® 3230 (Cyanide-free Silver Electrolyte):  

  • Who needs it? Industries that use silver plating, especially those with strict environmental regulations or a focus on worker safety. This includes:
    • Electronics manufacturers
    • Jewelry makers
    • Medical device companies
  • Why? It offers a safer alternative to traditional cyanide-based silver plating, reducing environmental impact and potential health hazards.

2. Charcofab – Fabric Panels: 3230:

  • Who needs it? Interior designers, architects, and homeowners seeking sustainable and aesthetically pleasing wall décor.
  • Why? These panels utilize recycled materials, reducing waste and the demand for virgin resources. They also offer a unique design element.

3. Academic Connections (University Courses):

  • Who needs it? Students interested in environmental science, ecology, and sustainability.
  • Why? These courses provide knowledge and practical skills in ecological restoration and sustainable practices, preparing students for careers in related fields.

4. Sustainable Agriculture (Rice Farming):

  • Who needs it? Rice farmers, particularly in regions like Kuttanad, where sustainable practices are crucial for long-term productivity and environmental health.
  • Why? Sustainable farming methods help conserve resources, reduce pollution, and improve the livelihoods of farmers.  

General Considerations:

  • Businesses: Companies across various sectors are increasingly adopting sustainable technologies to reduce their environmental footprint, improve their brand image, and meet regulatory requirements.  
  • Individuals: Consumers can contribute to sustainability by choosing products and services that are environmentally friendly.  
  • Governments: Policymakers play a crucial role in promoting sustainable technologies through regulations, incentives, and investments in research and development.  

Ultimately, the need for sustainable technology of 3230 depends on the specific context. However, the general trend is clear: as awareness of environmental issues grows, the demand for sustainable solutions will continue to increase across all sectors of society.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3230 ?

You’re asking a great question that gets to the heart of why sustainable technology is important! Here’s a breakdown of when sustainable technology of 3230 (and sustainable technology in general) is required:

1. When there are environmental regulations:

  • ARGUNA® 3230: When industries face regulations limiting or banning the use of cyanide in silver plating, they are required to switch to alternatives like ARGUNA® 3230. This is often driven by concerns about water pollution and worker safety.

2. When resources are scarce or costly:

  • Sustainable Agriculture: When farmers face challenges like water shortages, soil degradation, or rising fertilizer costs, sustainable practices become necessary to maintain productivity and profitability.  

3. When there’s a need to reduce waste:

  • Charcofab – Fabric Panels: When designers and consumers are looking for ways to reduce textile waste and create a circular economy, products like Charcofab panels become a required solution.

4. When there’s a growing awareness of environmental impact:

  • General Trend: As consumers and businesses become more aware of the environmental impact of their choices, there’s an increasing demand for sustainable products and services. This creates a market-driven need for sustainable technology.  

5. When there’s a need to address climate change:

  • Global Imperative: The need to mitigate climate change is a major driver for the development and adoption of sustainable technologies across all sectors. This includes renewable energy, energy efficiency, and sustainable transportation.

6. When there’s a focus on long-term sustainability:

  • Businesses and Governments: Organizations that prioritize long-term sustainability, both for their own operations and for the planet, will increasingly require sustainable technologies to achieve their goals.

7. When there’s a desire to improve social well-being:

  • Sustainable Development: Sustainable technology can play a role in addressing social challenges like poverty, inequality, and access to basic resources. This requires a focus on equitable and inclusive development.

In summary:

The need for sustainable technology of 3230 (and other sustainable solutions) arises from a combination of factors, including environmental regulations, resource constraints, waste management concerns, climate change, and a growing awareness of the importance of sustainability for the well-being of both people and the planet.Sources and related content

courtesy : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3230 ?

You’re right to ask “where” sustainable technology is needed! It’s not just about what it is, but where it’s applied that makes the difference. Here’s a breakdown of where sustainable technology of 3230 (and sustainable tech in general) is required:

1. Industries using silver plating:

  • Electronics manufacturing: Where ARGUNA® 3230 can replace cyanide-based processes, reducing pollution from factories.  
  • Jewelry making: To protect workers and the environment from toxic chemicals.  
  • Medical device companies: Where cyanide-free processes are often a requirement for safety reasons.  

2. Interior design and construction:

  • Homes, offices, retail spaces: Anywhere Charcofab panels can be used as a sustainable alternative for wall décor.  
  • Commercial buildings: Architects and designers can specify these panels to meet green building certifications.

3. Education and research:

  • Universities and colleges: Where courses like EU/ENVS 3230 and ENVS:3230 are taught, training the next generation of sustainability professionals.  
  • Research institutions: Developing and testing new sustainable technologies, including those related to “3230.”

4. Agriculture:

  • Rice paddies, especially in vulnerable regions: Like Kuttanad, where sustainable rice farming practices are essential for food security and environmental protection.
  • Farms of all types: To reduce water usage, minimize pollution, and improve soil health.

5. Urban environments:

  • Cities and towns: Where ecological restoration projects aim to create more sustainable and resilient urban habitats.
  • Public spaces: Parks, gardens, and green infrastructure can benefit from sustainable landscaping practices.  

6. Global context:

  • Developing countries: Where sustainable technologies can help address challenges related to poverty, resource scarcity, and environmental degradation.
  • International collaborations: Sharing knowledge and technology to promote sustainable development worldwide.

Key takeaway:

Sustainable technology of 3230 (and other sustainable solutions) is needed wherever there is an environmental or social challenge to address. This includes a wide range of industries, sectors, and geographic locations. The need for sustainable technology is not limited to a specific place, but rather a global imperative for creating a more sustainable future.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3230 ?

The question “How is required sustainable technology of 3230?” is a bit unusual, as it mixes up the need for sustainable technology with the methods of achieving it. Let’s clarify: We’ve established why sustainable technology related to 3230 is needed (environmental concerns, resource limitations, etc.). Now, let’s look at how it becomes required, meaning how it’s implemented and adopted:

1. Regulations and Standards:

  • Government mandates: Regulations can require the use of sustainable technologies. For example, laws might restrict the use of certain chemicals (like cyanide in silver plating), effectively requiring alternatives like ARGUNA® 3230. Building codes can require the use of sustainable materials, making products like Charcofab panels a necessary choice.  
  • Industry standards: Organizations can set standards that encourage or require their members to adopt sustainable practices. This can be driven by consumer demand or a desire to improve the industry’s environmental image.  

2. Market Forces:

  • Consumer demand: Increasingly, consumers are choosing sustainable products and services. This creates a market advantage for companies that offer them, effectively requiring businesses to adopt sustainable practices to remain competitive.  
  • Cost savings: Sustainable technologies can sometimes lead to long-term cost savings through reduced resource consumption or waste management. This financial incentive can require their adoption for businesses to remain profitable.  

3. Incentives and Support:

  • Government subsidies and tax breaks: Governments can offer financial incentives to encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies. This can make them more affordable and require their use in certain projects.  
  • Grants and funding: Research and development of sustainable technologies can be supported through grants and funding programs. This can help bring new, sustainable solutions to market and require their use in funded projects.  

4. Education and Awareness:

  • Training and education programs: Educating professionals and the public about the benefits of sustainable technologies can increase demand and facilitate their adoption. This can indirectly require their use by creating a more informed market.
  • Public awareness campaigns: Raising awareness about environmental issues can create social pressure for businesses and governments to adopt sustainable practices, effectively requiring them to act.  

5. Collaboration and Partnerships:

  • Industry partnerships: Companies can collaborate to develop and implement sustainable technologies. This can make it easier for them to meet regulatory requirements or respond to consumer demand.  
  • Public-private partnerships: Governments and businesses can work together to promote the adoption of sustainable technologies through joint projects and initiatives.

In short: Sustainable technology related to 3230 (and other sustainable solutions) becomes “required” through a combination of top-down approaches (regulations, standards) and bottom-up pressures (consumer demand, market forces). Incentives, education, and collaboration play a crucial role in facilitating the transition to a more sustainable future.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3230 ?

You’re looking for real-world examples of how sustainable technology related to “3230” is being used! Here are some case studies:

1. ARGUNA® 3230 (Cyanide-free Silver Electrolyte):

  • Industry: Electronics manufacturing
  • Challenge: Traditional silver plating processes using cyanide pose environmental and worker safety risks.  
  • Solution: A company switches to ARGUNA® 3230 for silver plating components in their electronic devices.
  • Results:
    • Reduced environmental impact due to the elimination of cyanide waste.
    • Improved worker safety as they are no longer exposed to toxic cyanide fumes.
    • Compliance with stricter environmental regulations.
    • Enhanced brand image as a company committed to sustainability.

2. Charcofab – Fabric Panels: 3230:

  • Project: Interior design for a new office building.
  • Challenge: The designers want to create a modern and aesthetically pleasing space while minimizing their environmental footprint.
  • Solution: They incorporate Charcofab panels as wall décor in the office lobby and meeting rooms.
  • Results:
    • A visually appealing and unique interior design.
    • Reduced waste as the panels are made from upcycled textile residues.  
    • Contribution to a circular economy by utilizing recycled materials.
    • Achievement of green building certifications.

3. Sustainable Agriculture (Rice Farming):

  • Location: Kuttanad region, India
  • Challenge: Traditional rice farming practices are leading to environmental degradation and declining productivity.
  • Solution: Farmers adopt sustainable practices promoted by ICAR, including:
    • Optimized seed use
    • Site-specific nutrient management
    • Eco-friendly pest control
  • Results:
    • Reduced environmental impact due to decreased use of fertilizers and pesticides.
    • Improved soil health and water conservation.
    • Increased rice yields and farmer incomes.
    • Enhanced resilience to climate change.

4. Academic Connections (University Courses):

  • Course: ENVS:3230 Sustainable Landscapes
  • Project: Students participate in the ecological restoration of a prairie.
  • Challenge: Degraded prairie ecosystem with loss of biodiversity.
  • Solution: Students learn about ecological restoration principles and apply them in a hands-on project.  
  • Results:
    • Restoration of a native prairie ecosystem.
    • Increased biodiversity and habitat for wildlife.
    • Students gain practical skills in ecological restoration.
    • Increased awareness of sustainability and environmental stewardship.

Key takeaways from these case studies:

  • Sustainable technology offers practical solutions to environmental challenges across various sectors.  
  • Implementing sustainable practices can lead to multiple benefits, including environmental protection, economic savings, and social well-being.  
  • Case studies provide real-world examples of how sustainable technology can be successfully applied.

Remember that these are just examples, and the specific details of each case study may vary. However, they illustrate the potential of sustainable technology to create a more sustainable future.

courtesy : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3230 ?

Unfortunately, a specific white paper dedicated solely to “Sustainable Technology of 3230” is unlikely to exist. This is because “3230” by itself doesn’t define a single, well-established technology. As we’ve discussed, it can relate to different areas like silver plating (ARGUNA® 3230), interior design (Charcofab), or academic courses.

However, I can offer you a structure and content suggestions for a white paper on sustainable technology related to “3230,” focusing on the most prominent example: ARGUNA® 3230, the cyanide-free silver electrolyte.

Title: Sustainable Silver Plating: A Case Study of ARGUNA® 3230

Abstract:

This white paper examines the challenges of traditional silver plating processes and presents ARGUNA® 3230 as a sustainable alternative. It explores the environmental and safety benefits of cyanide-free silver electrolytes and discusses the potential for wider adoption of this technology in various industries.

1. Introduction:

  • Briefly introduce the importance of silver plating in various industries (electronics, jewelry, etc.).
  • Highlight the environmental and safety concerns associated with traditional cyanide-based silver plating.
  • Introduce ARGUNA® 3230 as a sustainable solution.
  • State the purpose and scope of the white paper.

2. Traditional Silver Plating: Challenges and Limitations:

  • Describe the conventional silver plating process using cyanide.
  • Discuss the environmental risks associated with cyanide, including water pollution and soil contamination.
  • Explain the health hazards for workers exposed to cyanide fumes.
  • Highlight the regulatory pressures to reduce or eliminate cyanide use.

3. ARGUNA® 3230: A Sustainable Alternative:

  • Detail the composition and properties of ARGUNA® 3230.
  • Explain the cyanide-free mechanism of silver plating using this electrolyte.
  • Emphasize the environmental benefits:
    • Reduced toxicity and waste.
    • Lower risk of pollution.
    • Improved worker safety.
  • Discuss the performance and quality of silver plating achieved with ARGUNA® 3230.

4. Case Studies:

  • Present real-world examples of companies that have successfully implemented ARGUNA® 3230 in their silver plating processes.
  • Highlight the specific benefits they have experienced (e.g., reduced environmental impact, cost savings, improved product quality).

5. Industry Applications and Future Trends:

  • Discuss the potential for wider adoption of ARGUNA® 3230 in various industries.
  • Explore future trends in sustainable silver plating technology.
  • Consider the role of research and development in improving the sustainability of silver plating processes.

6. Conclusion:

  • Summarize the key findings of the white paper.
  • Reiterate the importance of sustainable silver plating practices.
  • Emphasize the potential of ARGUNA® 3230 to contribute to a more environmentally responsible industry.

7. References:

  • List all sources cited in the white paper.

Note: This is just a suggested structure. You can adapt it to focus on other aspects of “Sustainable Technology of 3230” depending on your specific interests and the information available.

Remember to conduct thorough research and gather reliable data to support your claims in the white paper.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3230 ?

You’re interested in how sustainable technology related to “3230” gets used in real-world industries. Here are some key industrial applications, focusing on the most prominent example, ARGUNA® 3230:

1. Electronics Manufacturing:

  • Application: Silver plating of electronic components, such as connectors, contacts, and printed circuit boards.
  • Benefits:
    • ARGUNA® 3230 replaces traditional cyanide-based silver plating, reducing the risk of environmental pollution and worker exposure to toxic chemicals.
    • The cyanide-free process simplifies waste treatment and reduces disposal costs.
    • The high-quality silver plating achieved with ARGUNA® 3230 ensures reliable performance of electronic devices.

2. Medical Technology:

  • Application: Silver plating of medical instruments and devices.
  • Benefits:
    • Many medical applications require cyanide-free processes due to safety concerns. ARGUNA® 3230 meets this requirement.
    • Silver has antimicrobial properties, making it useful for coating medical devices to prevent infections.  
    • The excellent soldering and bonding properties of ARGUNA® 3230 are essential for manufacturing reliable medical equipment.

3. Jewelry and Decorative Applications:

  • Application: Silver plating of jewelry, decorative items, and tableware.
  • Benefits:
    • ARGUNA® 3230 provides a safer and more environmentally friendly alternative to traditional cyanide-based silver plating in the jewelry industry.
    • The bright and lustrous silver finish achieved with ARGUNA® 3230 enhances the aesthetic appeal of decorative items.

4. Automotive Industry:

  • Application: Silver plating of electrical contacts and components in vehicles.
  • Benefits:
    • ARGUNA® 3230 ensures reliable electrical conductivity and corrosion resistance in automotive applications.
    • The cyanide-free process helps automotive manufacturers meet environmental regulations.

5. Aerospace Industry:

  • Application: Silver plating of components used in aircraft and spacecraft.
  • Benefits:
    • Silver plating provides excellent electrical conductivity and high-temperature resistance, which are crucial in aerospace applications.  
    • ARGUNA® 3230 offers a sustainable alternative for silver plating in the aerospace industry, where safety and environmental concerns are paramount.

General Industrial Benefits of Sustainable Technology:

  • Reduced environmental impact: Minimizing pollution and waste.
  • Improved worker safety: Protecting employees from hazardous chemicals.
  • Cost savings: Through reduced waste treatment and disposal costs, as well as improved resource efficiency.
  • Enhanced brand image: Demonstrating a commitment to sustainability can attract environmentally conscious customers and investors.
  • Compliance with regulations: Meeting increasingly stringent environmental standards.

It’s important to note that the specific industrial applications of sustainable technology related to “3230” may vary depending on the particular technology in question. However, the general trend is towards adopting more sustainable practices across all sectors to minimize environmental impact and promote a circular economy.

courtesy : Accenture

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »