Sustainable Technology of 3220

78 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3220 ?

It seems like you might be asking about a specific product called “EcoLine® 3220”. This is a product made by Cortec Corporation, and it’s a great example of sustainable technology. Here’s why:

Bio-based: EcoLine® 3220 is made from 99% renewable resources, primarily canola oil. This means it relies on plants, which can be replenished, rather than fossil fuels, which are finite.
Biodegradable: This product breaks down naturally in the environment, reducing its impact on landfills and ecosystems.
Protects metal: It’s designed as a temporary coating to prevent corrosion on metal surfaces during storage and shipping. This extends the life of metal products, reducing the need to produce new ones.
Safe for the environment: It has no harmful effects on rubber, plastics, or paints, and is considered environmentally safe.

Why is this important?

Sustainable technologies like EcoLine® 3220 are crucial for minimizing our impact on the planet. By using renewable resources, reducing waste, and preventing pollution, these technologies help us create a more environmentally friendly future.

Beyond EcoLine® 3220

There are many other examples of sustainable technology, including:

Renewable energy: Solar, wind, and hydro power provide clean alternatives to fossil fuels.
Electric vehicles: Reduce emissions and reliance on gasoline.
Energy-efficient appliances: Use less energy, saving money and resources.
Green building materials: Made from sustainable sources and reduce environmental impact.

Sustainable technology is constantly evolving, and it plays a vital role in addressing the challenges of climate change and resource depletion.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3220 ?

It seems you’re interested in sustainable technology, and the number 3220 might be a reference to a specific product. In this case, it’s likely you’re thinking of EcoLine® 3220, a product by Cortec Corporation.

Here’s what makes EcoLine® 3220 a good example of sustainable technology:

Bio-based: It’s made from 99% renewable resources, primarily canola oil. This means it relies on plants, which can be replenished, rather than fossil fuels, which are finite.
Biodegradable: This product breaks down naturally in the environment, reducing its impact on landfills and ecosystems.
Protects metal: It’s designed as a temporary coating to prevent corrosion on metal surfaces during storage and shipping. This extends the life of metal products, reducing the need to produce new ones.
Safe for the environment: It has no harmful effects on rubber, plastics, or paints, and is considered environmentally safe.

Why is this important?

Beyond EcoLine® 3220

There are many other examples of sustainable technology, including:

Renewable energy: Solar, wind, and hydro power provide clean alternatives to fossil fuels.
Electric vehicles: Reduce emissions and reliance on gasoline.
Energy-efficient appliances: Use less energy, saving money and resources.
Green building materials: Made from sustainable sources and reduce environmental impact.

Sustainable technology is constantly evolving, and it plays a vital role in addressing the challenges of climate change and resource depletion. Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3220 ?

EcoLine® 3220 is a valuable product for a wide range of industries and individuals who need to protect metal from corrosion, especially in a sustainable way. Here’s a breakdown of who might need it:

Manufacturers: Companies that produce metal parts or products can use EcoLine® 3220 to protect their goods during storage and shipping. This ensures that their products arrive to customers in perfect condition, free from rust and corrosion.
Shipping and logistics companies: These companies are responsible for transporting goods, often in harsh environments. EcoLine® 3220 can help them protect metal cargo from damage due to moisture, salt, and other corrosive elements.
Maintenance and repair professionals: Whether it’s maintaining machinery, vehicles, or infrastructure, professionals in these fields can use EcoLine® 3220 to protect metal parts from corrosion and extend their lifespan.
Individuals: Even homeowners can benefit from EcoLine® 3220. It can be used to protect tools, garden equipment, or any other metal items that are susceptible to rust.

Essentially, anyone who deals with metal and wants to prevent corrosion can benefit from EcoLine® 3220. Its bio-based and biodegradable nature makes it an especially attractive option for those who are environmentally conscious and looking for sustainable solutions.

Here are some specific examples of applications:

Protecting metal parts during manufacturing processes
Coating metal equipment for storage, whether indoors or outdoors
Preserving metal tools and machinery
Protecting metal components during shipping, especially in marine environments
Maintaining metal structures, such as bridges or pipelines

By using EcoLine® 3220, businesses and individuals can not only protect their valuable metal assets but also contribute to a more sustainable future.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3220 ?

You would need EcoLine® 3220 in situations where you need to protect metal from corrosion, especially when you’re looking for a sustainable and environmentally friendly solution. Here are some specific instances:

During storage: If you have metal parts, equipment, or finished products that need to be stored for any length of time, EcoLine® 3220 can protect them from rust and corrosion caused by humidity, moisture, or other environmental factors. This is especially important for long-term storage or when items are stored in harsh conditions.
During shipping: When metal items are being transported, they can be exposed to various corrosive elements, such as salt spray, rain, or temperature fluctuations. Applying EcoLine® 3220 before shipping can ensure that the items arrive at their destination in good condition.
During manufacturing processes: Some manufacturing processes can expose metal to corrosive substances. EcoLine® 3220 can be used to protect metal components at various stages of production, preventing damage and ensuring the quality of the final product.
For maintenance and repair: When maintaining or repairing metal equipment, machinery, or structures, EcoLine® 3220 can be used to protect exposed metal parts from corrosion, extending their lifespan and reducing the need for frequent replacements.
For protecting personal belongings: Even at home, you might have metal tools, garden equipment, or other items that are susceptible to rust. EcoLine® 3220 can be used to protect these items and keep them in good condition.

Essentially, any time you need to protect metal from corrosion, and you want to do so in an environmentally responsible way, EcoLine® 3220 is a good option. Its bio-based and biodegradable nature makes it particularly suitable for those who are concerned about the environmental impact of their choices. Sources and related content

courtesy : Carnegie India

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3220 ?

EcoLine® 3220 can be used in a variety of locations and industries where metal needs protection from corrosion. Here are some key areas:

Industries:

Manufacturing: Factories producing metal parts, machinery, or finished goods can use EcoLine® 3220 to protect their products during storage and transportation.
Shipping and logistics: Warehouses, ports, and transportation companies can apply it to protect metal cargo from the elements during transit.
Construction: On construction sites, it can protect metal components of buildings, bridges, or other infrastructure from rust and corrosion.
Oil and gas: This industry often deals with metal equipment exposed to harsh conditions, where EcoLine® 3220 can provide crucial protection.
Marine: Shipyards, ports, and offshore platforms can use it to protect metal structures and equipment from saltwater corrosion.
Aerospace: Manufacturers and maintenance facilities in the aerospace industry can utilize it to protect metal parts of aircraft and spacecraft.
Automotive: Car manufacturers and repair shops can apply it to protect metal components of vehicles.

Locations:

Factories and warehouses: EcoLine® 3220 can be used to protect metal items stored indoors or outdoors in these facilities.
Construction sites: It can be applied to metal structures and materials on-site to prevent corrosion during the building process.
Ports and shipyards: These locations often have high humidity and exposure to saltwater, making EcoLine® 3220 essential for protecting metal.
Offshore platforms: The harsh marine environment makes corrosion a significant concern, and EcoLine® 3220 can help protect metal structures and equipment.
Transportation vehicles: Trucks, ships, trains, and airplanes can all benefit from the corrosion protection offered by EcoLine® 3220.

Essentially, anywhere metal is exposed to conditions that can cause corrosion, EcoLine® 3220 can be a valuable tool for protection. Its sustainable and biodegradable nature makes it a particularly good choice for environmentally conscious businesses and individuals.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3220 ?

EcoLine® 3220 is a ready-to-use product, meaning it doesn’t require any mixing or dilution before application. This makes it convenient and easy to use in various situations. Here’s how it’s typically applied:

Application Methods:

Dipping: This method is suitable for smaller parts or items that can be fully submerged in the liquid. Simply dip the metal item into a container of EcoLine® 3220, ensuring it’s completely coated.
Spraying: Spraying is a good option for larger surfaces or when you need to apply a thin, even coat. You can use a spray gun or a hand-held sprayer to apply the product.
Brushing: Brushing is useful for applying EcoLine® 3220 to specific areas or for touch-up applications. Use a brush to apply a thin layer of the product to the metal surface.

Important Considerations:

Clean the surface: Before applying EcoLine® 3220, make sure the metal surface is clean and free from any dirt, rust, or other contaminants. This will ensure that the product adheres properly and provides optimal protection.
Apply a thin coat: A thin, even coat of EcoLine® 3220 is sufficient for most applications. Applying too much product can be wasteful and may not provide any additional benefit.
Allow to dry: After applying EcoLine® 3220, allow it to dry completely. The drying time will vary depending on the temperature and humidity conditions.
Follow safety precautions: When using EcoLine® 3220, it’s important to follow the safety precautions outlined in the product’s safety data sheet (SDS). This may include wearing gloves and eye protection.

Specific Applications:

The application method may vary slightly depending on the specific application. For example, when protecting ballast tanks in ships, the product may be pumped into the tank and then filled with water to ensure complete coverage.

Overall, EcoLine® 3220 is designed to be user-friendly and can be applied easily using various methods. By following the instructions and taking the necessary precautions, you can effectively protect your metal items from corrosion in a sustainable way.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3220 ?

While I don’t have access to specific case studies with quantifiable data for EcoLine® 3220, I can provide you with some scenarios where its sustainable properties would be highly beneficial, effectively demonstrating its value:

Scenario 1: Marine Shipping

Problem: A shipping company transports metal cargo across oceans. The cargo is exposed to salt spray and humidity, leading to significant corrosion and damage. This results in financial losses due to damaged goods and the need for costly replacements. Traditional corrosion prevention methods often involve petroleum-based products with negative environmental impacts.
Solution: The company switches to EcoLine® 3220 to protect its metal cargo. The bio-based and biodegradable coating effectively prevents corrosion, ensuring that goods arrive in perfect condition. This reduces losses, improves customer satisfaction, and minimizes the company’s environmental footprint.
Benefits:
- Reduced financial losses due to corrosion damage.
- Improved customer satisfaction with undamaged goods.
- Enhanced environmental image for the shipping company.
- Compliance with environmental regulations.

Scenario 2: Manufacturing and Storage

Problem: A manufacturing company produces metal parts that need to be stored for extended periods before being shipped to customers. The company’s warehouse experiences fluctuating temperatures and humidity, leading to rust and corrosion on the stored parts. This results in wasted resources and delays in fulfilling orders.
Solution: The company implements EcoLine® 3220 to protect its metal parts during storage. The bio-based coating creates a protective barrier against corrosion, ensuring that the parts remain in good condition until they are needed. This reduces waste, improves efficiency, and saves the company money.
Benefits:
- Reduced waste due to corrosion damage.
- Improved efficiency in fulfilling orders.
- Cost savings on replacing corroded parts.
- Enhanced product quality and customer satisfaction.

Scenario 3: Infrastructure Maintenance

Problem: A city’s infrastructure, including bridges and pipelines, is exposed to harsh weather conditions and corrosive elements. Regular maintenance is required to prevent rust and corrosion, but traditional methods often involve environmentally harmful chemicals.
Solution: The city adopts EcoLine® 3220 for protecting metal components during maintenance activities. The bio-based and biodegradable coating provides effective corrosion protection while minimizing the environmental impact. This helps the city maintain its infrastructure in a sustainable way.
Benefits:
- Extended lifespan of infrastructure components.
- Reduced environmental impact of maintenance activities.
- Compliance with environmental regulations.
- Improved public image for the city.

These scenarios illustrate how EcoLine® 3220 can be a valuable sustainable technology in various industries and applications. While specific case studies with data may be available from Cortec Corporation, these examples highlight the potential benefits of using this bio-based and biodegradable corrosion inhibitor.Sources and related content

coutesy : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3220 ?

Unfortunately, I don’t have access to a specific white paper dedicated solely to EcoLine® 3220. However, Cortec Corporation, the manufacturer, may have such a document available. I recommend contacting them directly through their website or customer service channels to inquire about it.

In the meantime, I can offer you some key points that would likely be covered in a white paper about EcoLine® 3220, based on the information I have:

Title (Example): EcoLine® 3220: A Sustainable Solution for Corrosion Protection

Introduction:

Briefly discuss the problem of corrosion and its environmental and economic impact.
Introduce EcoLine® 3220 as a bio-based and biodegradable alternative to traditional corrosion inhibitors.
Highlight the key benefits of using EcoLine® 3220, such as its renewability, biodegradability, and effectiveness in preventing corrosion.

Sustainability Aspects:

Detail the bio-based composition of EcoLine® 3220, emphasizing its reliance on renewable resources like canola oil.
Explain its biodegradability and how it breaks down naturally in the environment, reducing its impact on landfills and ecosystems.
Compare its environmental footprint to traditional petroleum-based corrosion inhibitors, highlighting the reduced reliance on fossil fuels and lower toxicity.

Technical Performance:

Describe the mechanisms by which EcoLine® 3220 protects metal from corrosion.
Present data or test results demonstrating its effectiveness in preventing rust and corrosion in various applications and environments.
Discuss its compatibility with different types of metals and its suitability for various application methods (dipping, spraying, brushing).

Applications and Case Studies:

Showcase various industries and applications where EcoLine® 3220 can be used, such as manufacturing, shipping, construction, and maintenance.
Provide real-world examples or case studies of how EcoLine® 3220 has been successfully implemented to protect metal assets and reduce environmental impact.

Comparison with Alternatives:

Compare EcoLine® 3220 to other corrosion protection methods, including traditional chemical inhibitors and other bio-based options.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each option, considering factors like performance, environmental impact, cost, and safety.

Conclusion:

Reiterate the key benefits of EcoLine® 3220 as a sustainable and effective solution for corrosion protection.
Emphasize its role in reducing environmental impact and promoting a circular economy.
Encourage readers to consider EcoLine® 3220 as a viable alternative to traditional corrosion inhibitors.

Call to Action:

Provide contact information for Cortec Corporation for further inquiries or to request product samples.
Encourage readers to explore other sustainable technologies and practices to minimize their environmental footprint.

This outline provides a comprehensive overview of what a white paper on EcoLine® 3220 might contain. Remember to contact Cortec Corporation directly to see if they have such a document available.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3220 ?

EcoLine® 3220 has a wide range of industrial applications thanks to its effective corrosion protection and sustainable properties. Here are some key examples:

1. Manufacturing:

Metal Parts Protection: Manufacturers of metal components (e.g., automotive parts, machinery parts, tools) can use EcoLine® 3220 to protect their products from corrosion during storage and transportation. This ensures that the parts arrive to customers in perfect condition, free from rust and damage.
Equipment Preservation: Manufacturers of heavy machinery and equipment can apply EcoLine® 3220 to protect their products during storage, especially if they are stored outdoors or in environments with high humidity.
In-Process Protection: EcoLine® 3220 can be used at various stages of the manufacturing process to protect metal components from corrosion during production, especially when they are exposed to corrosive substances or environments.

2. Shipping and Logistics:

Cargo Protection: Shipping companies and logistics providers can use EcoLine® 3220 to protect metal cargo during transportation, especially when it is shipped by sea or exposed to harsh weather conditions. This helps prevent damage to goods and ensures that they arrive at their destination in good condition.
Warehouse Storage: Warehouses and storage facilities can use EcoLine® 3220 to protect metal items stored for extended periods, especially in environments with fluctuating temperatures and humidity levels.

3. Construction:

Structural Steel Protection: Construction companies can apply EcoLine® 3220 to protect structural steel components (e.g., beams, columns, rebars) from corrosion during storage and construction. This helps ensure the long-term integrity of buildings and infrastructure.
Metal Component Protection: Other metal components used in construction, such as pipes, fittings, and fasteners, can also be protected with EcoLine® 3220 to prevent corrosion and extend their lifespan.

4. Oil and Gas:

Equipment Protection: Companies in the oil and gas industry can use EcoLine® 3220 to protect metal equipment and infrastructure (e.g., pipelines, storage tanks, drilling equipment) from corrosion, especially in harsh offshore or desert environments.
Ballast Tank Preservation: EcoLine® 3220 can be used to protect ballast tanks in ships and offshore platforms from corrosion caused by saltwater.

5. Marine:

Ship and Boat Maintenance: Shipyards and marine maintenance facilities can use EcoLine® 3220 to protect metal parts of ships and boats from corrosion caused by saltwater and humidity.
Port Infrastructure: Port authorities can apply EcoLine® 3220 to protect metal structures and equipment in ports from corrosion caused by exposure to saltwater and marine environments.

6. Other Industries:

Aerospace: Manufacturers and maintenance facilities in the aerospace industry can use EcoLine® 3220 to protect metal parts of aircraft and spacecraft from corrosion.
Automotive: Car manufacturers and repair shops can apply EcoLine® 3220 to protect metal components of vehicles from rust and corrosion.
Metalworking: Metalworking companies can use EcoLine® 3220 to protect metal sheets, bars, and other materials from corrosion during storage and processing.

These are just some examples of the many industrial applications of EcoLine® 3220. Its versatility, effectiveness, and sustainable nature make it a valuable tool for various industries looking to protect their metal assets from corrosion while minimizing their environmental impact.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3220 ?

While I don’t have access to specific details about the ongoing research and development for EcoLine® 3220, I can provide you with some insights into the likely areas of focus, based on industry trends and the nature of sustainable technologies:

1. Enhancing Performance:

Improved Corrosion Protection: Researchers may be working on further enhancing the corrosion protection properties of EcoLine® 3220, making it even more effective in challenging environments and for a wider range of metals.
Extended Protection Duration: Efforts might be focused on increasing the duration of protection offered by a single application, reducing the need for frequent reapplication and further minimizing resource consumption.
Multi-Functional Properties: R&D could explore incorporating additional functionalities into EcoLine® 3220, such as lubrication, anti-static properties, or even UV protection, making it a more versatile product.

2. Optimizing Sustainability:

Increased Bio-Based Content: Researchers may be striving to further increase the bio-based content of EcoLine® 3220, potentially reaching 100% or exploring new renewable resources as feedstock.
Improved Biodegradability: Efforts could be directed towards enhancing the biodegradability of the product, ensuring it breaks down even faster and more completely in various environmental conditions.
Reduced Environmental Impact: R&D might focus on minimizing any potential environmental impacts associated with the production or use of EcoLine® 3220, such as reducing energy consumption or minimizing waste generation.

3. Expanding Applications:

New Industries and Sectors: Researchers could be exploring the potential of EcoLine® 3220 in new industries and sectors where it hasn’t been widely adopted yet, such as agriculture, electronics, or even art conservation.
Novel Application Methods: R&D might focus on developing new and more efficient application methods for EcoLine® 3220, such as aerosol spraying, electrostatic application, or even incorporating it into coatings or paints.

4. Addressing Regulatory Requirements:

Compliance with Evolving Standards: Researchers would likely be working to ensure that EcoLine® 3220 remains compliant with evolving environmental regulations and standards, both domestically and internationally.
Meeting Specific Industry Needs: R&D might focus on tailoring EcoLine® 3220 to meet the specific needs and requirements of different industries, such as food processing, medical devices, or aerospace.

5. Cost Optimization:

Efficient Production Processes: Researchers may be working on optimizing the production process of EcoLine® 3220 to reduce costs and make it more competitive with traditional corrosion inhibitors.
Sustainable Sourcing of Raw Materials: R&D might focus on sourcing raw materials for EcoLine® 3220 from sustainable and readily available sources, ensuring long-term supply and cost stability.

These are some potential areas of research and development for EcoLine® 3220. Cortec Corporation is likely investing in continuous improvement to make this sustainable technology even more effective, environmentally friendly, and versatile.

courtesy : Accenture

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.