
Sustainable Technology of 3140 ?
While there doesn’t appear to be a specific technology or product called “3140”, the principles of sustainable technology can be applied to a wide range of fields and industries. Here are some examples of sustainable technologies:
- Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power are all sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels.
- Energy Efficiency: Technologies that reduce energy consumption, such as LED lighting, smart thermostats, and improved insulation.
- Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, hybrid cars, and public transportation systems that reduce emissions and reliance on fossil fuels.
- Waste Management: Recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy technologies that reduce landfill waste and promote a circular economy.
- Sustainable Agriculture: Practices that reduce environmental impact, such as crop rotation, organic farming, and precision agriculture.
- Green Building: Construction and design practices that minimize environmental impact and maximize energy efficiency, resource conservation, and occupant health.
If you can provide more context about “3140”, I may be able to give you a more specific answer.
You stopped this response
What is Sustainable Technology of 3140
Unfortunately, with the information provided, it’s impossible to determine the specific “Sustainable Technology of 3140”.
It’s possible that “3140” refers to:
- A specific product or model number: In this case, the sustainable technology would be related to the design, manufacturing, use, and disposal of that particular product. For example, if “3140” refers to a car model, the sustainable technology could involve its electric powertrain, lightweight materials, or recyclable components.
- A code or classification: It might be a code used within a specific industry or organization to categorize sustainable technologies.
- A year or time period: Perhaps it refers to sustainable technologies that were developed or prevalent around the year 3140 (though this is speculative).
To help me understand and answer your question better, could you please provide more context about “3140”? For example:
- What is the source of this information?
- Where did you encounter this term?
- What is the general topic or field you’re interested in?
With more information, I can try to identify the specific sustainable technology you’re looking for or provide relevant examples.
Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3140 ?
Unfortunately, without knowing what “Sustainable Technology of 3140” refers to, it’s impossible to say who specifically requires it.
However, in general, the need for sustainable technology is universal. It’s not limited to any one group or industry. Here’s why:
- Everyone is affected by climate change and environmental issues: From individuals to large corporations, we all experience the impacts of pollution, resource depletion, and climate change. Sustainable technologies offer solutions to mitigate these problems and create a healthier planet for everyone.
- Businesses need sustainable practices to remain competitive: Consumers are increasingly demanding eco-friendly products and services. Companies that adopt sustainable technologies can improve their brand reputation, attract customers, and gain a competitive edge.
- Governments have a responsibility to protect the environment: Governments at all levels are implementing policies and regulations to promote sustainability. This creates a need for sustainable technologies to help meet environmental targets and comply with regulations.
Therefore, the “need” for sustainable technology, whatever it may be in the case of “3140”, ultimately extends to:
- Individuals: To reduce their environmental footprint and contribute to a sustainable future.
- Businesses: To improve their operations, meet consumer demand, and comply with regulations.
- Governments: To protect the environment and ensure a sustainable future for their citizens.
If you can provide more information about what “3140” refers to, I may be able to give you a more specific answer about who requires that particular sustainable technology.Sources and related content
When is required Sustainable Technology of 3140 ?
Unfortunately, I still need more information about what “Sustainable Technology of 3140” refers to in order to answer your question about when it is required.
However, I can talk about the general timeline and urgency of sustainable technology in our world today:
- The need for sustainable technology is now: We are already facing the consequences of climate change, pollution, and resource depletion. The longer we wait to adopt sustainable practices, the more severe these problems will become.
- Sustainable technology is not just for the future: While it’s important to develop new and innovative sustainable technologies, we also need to implement existing solutions as quickly as possible. This includes things like renewable energy, energy efficiency, and sustainable agriculture.
- The transition to a sustainable future is a continuous process: It will require ongoing research, development, and implementation of new technologies and practices. There is no single point in time when we will have “achieved” sustainability.
Therefore, the answer to “when is required Sustainable Technology of 3140?” is:
- As soon as possible: The need for sustainable technology is urgent and immediate.
- Continuously: We need to constantly adapt and improve our sustainable technologies and practices as we learn more and face new challenges.
If you can provide more context about “3140”, I may be able to give you a more specific answer about when that particular technology is required.
COURTESY : Tech Evaluate
Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3140 ?
Unfortunately, without knowing what “Sustainable Technology of 3140” refers to, it’s impossible to pinpoint the exact locations where it’s required.
However, considering the broad scope of sustainability, it’s safe to say that the need for sustainable technology exists in a wide range of places:
- Homes: Sustainable technologies like energy-efficient appliances, solar panels, and water conservation systems are needed in homes to reduce our environmental footprint.
- Businesses: Companies across all sectors need sustainable technologies to improve their operations, reduce waste, and meet consumer demand for eco-friendly products and services.
- Transportation: Sustainable transportation technologies like electric vehicles, public transportation, and bike-sharing programs are needed in cities and towns to reduce emissions and improve air quality.
- Agriculture: Sustainable farming practices and technologies are needed to produce food in a way that minimizes environmental impact and ensures food security.
- Industry: Manufacturing and industrial sectors need sustainable technologies to reduce pollution, conserve resources, and minimize waste.
- Cities: Urban areas need sustainable infrastructure, including green buildings, renewable energy systems, and efficient waste management, to become more sustainable and livable.
- Rural areas: Sustainable technologies are needed in rural areas to support sustainable agriculture, forestry, and resource management.
Essentially, the need for sustainable technology exists wherever human activity takes place. It’s a global imperative that requires action at all levels, from individuals to governments.
If you can provide more information about what “3140” refers to, I may be able to give you a more specific answer about where that particular technology is required.Sources and related content
How is required Sustainable Technology of 3140 ?
Unfortunately, without knowing what “Sustainable Technology of 3140” refers to, it’s impossible to give specific details on how it is required.
However, I can describe the general ways sustainable technologies are implemented and encouraged:
1. Policy and Regulation:
- Government mandates: Governments can require the use of certain sustainable technologies in specific sectors, such as mandating renewable energy targets or setting emissions standards for vehicles.
- Incentives: Governments can offer financial incentives, such as tax breaks or subsidies, to encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies.
- Standards and labeling: Setting standards for energy efficiency or environmental performance can help consumers make informed choices and drive the market for sustainable products.
2. Market Forces:
- Consumer demand: Growing consumer awareness of environmental issues is driving demand for sustainable products and services.
- Competitive advantage: Companies that adopt sustainable technologies can gain a competitive edge by reducing costs, improving their brand reputation, and attracting customers.
- Investment: Investors are increasingly considering environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors when making investment decisions, which is driving capital towards sustainable technologies.
3. Education and Awareness:
- Public awareness campaigns: Educating the public about the benefits of sustainable technology can encourage adoption and support for sustainable policies.
- Training and skills development: Providing training and education on sustainable technologies can help create a skilled workforce and drive innovation.
4. Collaboration and Partnerships:
- Industry partnerships: Collaboration between companies can help accelerate the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.
- Research and development: Investing in research and development is crucial for creating new and innovative sustainable technologies.
5. Individual Actions:
- Consumer choices: Individuals can choose to purchase sustainable products and services, reduce their energy consumption, and adopt sustainable practices in their daily lives.
- Advocacy: Individuals can advocate for sustainable policies and support organizations working to promote sustainable technology.
Ultimately, the implementation of sustainable technology requires a multi-faceted approach involving governments, businesses, individuals, and organizations working together to create a more sustainable future.
If you can provide more context about “3140”, I may be able to give you a more specific answer about how that particular technology is required.Sources and related content
Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3140 ?
It seems you might be interested in how “Sustainable Technology of 3140” can be applied in real-world scenarios. While I still don’t know exactly what “3140” refers to, I can offer some general examples of how sustainable technologies are used in case studies:
1. Renewable Energy Case Study:
- Company: A large tech company like Google or Apple.
- Challenge: To reduce their carbon footprint and power their data centers with clean energy.
- Solution: Investing in large-scale solar and wind farms, and developing on-site renewable energy installations.
- Results: Significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, cost savings on energy bills, and improved public image.
2. Sustainable Agriculture Case Study:
- Organization: A farming community or agricultural cooperative.
- Challenge: To increase crop yields while minimizing environmental impact.
- Solution: Implementing precision agriculture techniques, such as using drones and sensors to monitor soil conditions and optimize irrigation.
- Results: Increased crop yields, reduced water consumption, and decreased use of fertilizers and pesticides.
3. Green Building Case Study:
- Project: Construction of a new office building or residential complex.
- Challenge: To design and build a building that is energy-efficient, resource-conserving, and healthy for occupants.
- Solution: Incorporating green building materials, designing for natural light and ventilation, and implementing rainwater harvesting systems.
- Results: Reduced energy and water consumption, lower operating costs, and improved occupant well-being.
4. Sustainable Transportation Case Study:
- City: A major metropolitan area.
- Challenge: To reduce traffic congestion and air pollution.
- Solution: Investing in electric bus fleets, expanding public transportation networks, and promoting cycling and walking infrastructure.
- Results: Reduced greenhouse gas emissions, improved air quality, and increased accessibility to transportation options.
These are just a few examples of how sustainable technologies are being used in case studies across various sectors. By examining real-world applications, we can learn how to effectively implement sustainable solutions and achieve positive environmental and economic outcomes.
If you can provide more information about what “3140” refers to, I may be able to give you a more specific case study related to that technology.Sources and related content
COURTESY : Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)
White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3140 ?
It seems you’re interested in a white paper specifically about “Sustainable Technology of 3140”. Unfortunately, without knowing what “3140” refers to, it’s impossible to provide a relevant white paper.
However, I can offer some general information about white papers on sustainable technology and point you towards some resources that might be helpful:
What is a white paper?
A white paper is a document, often published by a company or organization, that provides in-depth information on a specific topic. It’s typically used to educate readers about a particular issue, technology, or product, and to present a case for a specific solution or approach.
White papers on sustainable technology:
White papers on sustainable technology can cover a wide range of topics, such as:
- Renewable energy technologies: Solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power.
- Energy efficiency: Technologies and strategies for reducing energy consumption.
- Sustainable transportation: Electric vehicles, alternative fuels, and public transportation.
- Waste management: Recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy technologies.
- Sustainable agriculture: Practices that reduce environmental impact and promote food security.
- Green building: Construction and design practices that minimize environmental impact.
Where to find white papers on sustainable technology:
- Industry associations: Many industry associations publish white papers on sustainable technologies relevant to their members.
- Research institutions: Universities and research organizations often release white papers on their latest findings in sustainable technology.
- Government agencies: Government agencies involved in environmental protection and energy often publish white papers on sustainable technology policies and initiatives.
- Technology companies: Companies that develop sustainable technologies often publish white papers to showcase their products and solutions.
To find a white paper specifically on “Sustainable Technology of 3140”, you’ll need to provide more information about what “3140” refers to. Once you have that information, you can try searching for white papers on that specific topic using search engines or the resources mentioned above.
Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3140 ?
While I still need more information about what “Sustainable Technology of 3140” actually is, I can share some general examples of how sustainable technologies are applied in various industries:
1. Manufacturing:
- Energy efficiency: Implementing energy-efficient machinery and processes to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.
- Waste reduction: Minimizing waste generation through process optimization, recycling, and reuse of materials.
- Sustainable materials: Using recycled or sustainably sourced materials in production.
- Pollution control: Installing pollution control equipment to reduce emissions and wastewater discharge.
2. Energy:
- Renewable energy: Generating electricity from renewable sources like solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal.
- Smart grids: Developing smart grids to optimize energy distribution and reduce energy loss.
- Energy storage: Implementing energy storage solutions to store and utilize renewable energy effectively.
3. Agriculture:
- Precision agriculture: Using technology to optimize irrigation, fertilization, and pest control, reducing resource use and environmental impact.
- Organic farming: Employing organic farming practices to reduce the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides.
- Sustainable livestock management: Implementing practices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve animal welfare.
4. Construction:
- Green building: Designing and constructing buildings that are energy-efficient, resource-conserving, and healthy for occupants.
- Sustainable materials: Using recycled or sustainably sourced building materials.
- Waste reduction: Minimizing construction waste through efficient design and prefabrication.
5. Transportation:
- Electric vehicles: Switching to electric vehicles to reduce emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.
- Alternative fuels: Developing and using alternative fuels like biofuels and hydrogen.
- Public transportation: Investing in and improving public transportation systems to reduce traffic congestion and emissions.
6. Information Technology:
- Energy-efficient hardware: Using energy-efficient servers, computers, and other IT equipment.
- Cloud computing: Utilizing cloud computing to optimize resource utilization and reduce energy consumption.
- E-waste recycling: Properly recycling electronic waste to recover valuable materials and prevent pollution.
These are just a few examples of how sustainable technologies are being applied in various industries. By adopting sustainable practices and technologies, businesses can reduce their environmental impact, improve their bottom line, and contribute to a more sustainable future.
If you can provide more context about “3140”, I may be able to give you more specific examples of its industrial applications.
Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3140 ?
You’re asking about the research and development (R&D) that might be going into “Sustainable Technology of 3140”. Since I don’t know what “3140” is, I can’t give specifics. However, I can tell you about the general trends in sustainable technology R&D:
1. Focus Areas:
- Advanced Materials: Developing new materials that are more sustainable, durable, and recyclable. This includes bio-based plastics, lightweight composites, and materials with improved energy efficiency.
- Energy Storage: Researching and developing more efficient and cost-effective energy storage solutions, such as advanced batteries, pumped hydro storage, and thermal energy storage.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning: Using AI and machine learning to optimize energy consumption, improve resource management, and accelerate the development of new sustainable technologies.
- Biotechnology: Exploring the use of biotechnology to develop sustainable solutions in areas like agriculture, waste management, and materials production.
- Nanotechnology: Investigating the application of nanotechnology to create more efficient solar cells, improve water filtration, and develop new sustainable materials.
2. R&D Approaches:
- Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Sustainable technology R&D often involves collaboration between scientists, engineers, and other experts from different fields.
- Life Cycle Assessment: Researchers are increasingly considering the entire life cycle of products and technologies, from raw material extraction to end-of-life disposal, to ensure sustainability.
- Open Innovation: Companies and research institutions are increasingly collaborating and sharing knowledge to accelerate the development of sustainable technologies.
- Simulation and Modeling: Advanced computer simulations and modeling are being used to design and optimize sustainable technologies.
3. Challenges:
- Cost: Developing and implementing sustainable technologies can be expensive, requiring significant investment in R&D.
- Scalability: Scaling up sustainable technologies from the lab to commercial applications can be challenging.
- Intermittency: Renewable energy sources like solar and wind can be intermittent, requiring energy storage solutions to ensure reliability.
- Complexity: Sustainable technology R&D often involves complex systems and interactions, requiring interdisciplinary collaboration and a holistic approach.
4. Importance:
Continued research and development in sustainable technology is crucial for addressing the world’s most pressing environmental challenges, such as climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. By investing in R&D, we can accelerate the transition to a more sustainable future.
If you can tell me more about “3140”, I might be able to provide more specific information about the research and development efforts related to that particular technology.Sources and related content
COURTESY : Carnegie India
References
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
- ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
- ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
- ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
- ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
- ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
- ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
- ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
- ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
- ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
- ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
- ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
- ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
- ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
- ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
- ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
- ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
- ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
- ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
- ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
- ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
- ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
- ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
- ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
- ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
- ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
- ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
- ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
- ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
- ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
- ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
- ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
- ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
- ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
- ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
- ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
- ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
- ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
- ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
- ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
- ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
- ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
- ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
- ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
- ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
- ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
- ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
- ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
- ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
- ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
- ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
- ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
- ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
- ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
- ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
- ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
- ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
- ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
- ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
- ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
- ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
- ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
- ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
- ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
- ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
- ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
- ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
- ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
- ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
- ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
- ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
- ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
- ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
- ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
- ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
- ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.