Sustainable Technology of 3070

Sustainable Technology of 3070 ?

Sustainable technology, also known as green technology, refers to the use of technology to minimize negative impacts on the environment. It encompasses a wide range of practices and innovations aimed at reducing resource consumption, pollution, and waste, while promoting energy efficiency and the use of renewable resources.  

Key Principles of Sustainable Technology:

• Resource Efficiency: Utilizing resources like energy, water, and raw materials more efficiently to reduce waste and environmental impact.  
• Renewable Energy: Shifting towards renewable energy sources like solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal to decrease reliance on fossil fuels.
• Pollution Reduction: Developing technologies that minimize or eliminate pollution of air, water, and soil.  
• Waste Management: Implementing strategies for waste reduction, reuse, recycling, and composting to minimize landfill waste.  
• Life Cycle Assessment: Evaluating the environmental impact of products and technologies throughout their entire life cycle, from design and manufacturing to use and disposal.  

Examples of Sustainable Technology:

• Renewable Energy Technologies: Solar panels, wind turbines, hydroelectric dams, and geothermal power plants.  
• Energy Efficiency: LED lighting, smart thermostats, energy-efficient appliances, and building insulation.  
• Green Building: Sustainable building design and construction practices that minimize environmental impact.  
• Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, hybrid cars, public transportation, and bicycle infrastructure.  
• Precision Agriculture: Using technology to optimize crop production while minimizing water and fertilizer use.  
• Water Conservation: Developing water-efficient irrigation systems and water recycling technologies.  
• Waste Management: Recycling programs, composting systems, and waste-to-energy technologies.  

Benefits of Sustainable Technology:

• Environmental Protection: Reduces pollution, conserves resources, and mitigates climate change.  
• Economic Growth: Creates new industries, jobs, and market opportunities.  
• Social Equity: Improves access to resources and reduces environmental disparities.  
• Enhanced Quality of Life: Promotes healthier environments and improves living standards.  

Challenges and Considerations:

• Cost: Implementing sustainable technologies can sometimes be more expensive upfront.  
• Technological Limitations: Some sustainable technologies are still under development or have limitations in their efficiency or scalability.  
• Infrastructure: Requires supportive infrastructure to adopt and implement sustainable technologies effectively.
• Policy and Regulations: Supportive policies and regulations are needed to incentivize and guide the adoption of sustainable practices.  

Sustainable technology is crucial for addressing the environmental challenges facing our planet. By embracing these technologies and practices, we can create a more sustainable future for all.   Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 3070 ?

It seems you might be thinking of the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070, which is a popular graphics processing unit (GPU) for computers. While GPUs themselves aren’t typically considered “sustainable technology” in the same way as solar panels or wind turbines, there are ways to make their use more sustainable:  

1. Energy Efficiency:

• Optimize Settings: Adjusting in-game settings and using power management tools can reduce the GPU’s power consumption.  
• Undervolting: Some users undervolt their GPUs to reduce power consumption without significantly impacting performance.  
• Efficient Cooling: Proper cooling solutions can help the GPU operate at optimal temperatures, improving efficiency and longevity.  

2. Longevity and Reuse:

• Proper Maintenance: Keeping the GPU clean and well-maintained can extend its lifespan.  
• Second-hand Market: Selling or donating the GPU when upgrading can allow it to be reused by someone else.

3. Manufacturing and Materials:

• Recycled Materials: Some manufacturers are starting to explore the use of recycled materials in GPU production.
• Responsible Manufacturing: Supporting companies that prioritize sustainable manufacturing practices and reduce waste.

4. Software and Optimization:

• Driver Updates: Keeping drivers up to date can improve performance and efficiency.  
• Game Optimization: Game developers can optimize their games to reduce the demands on the GPU, lowering power consumption.  

Important Note: It’s crucial to remember that the most significant environmental impact of GPUs comes from their manufacturing process, which involves the use of energy and resources. Therefore, extending the lifespan of a GPU and using it efficiently are essential for minimizing its overall environmental footprint.

If you have any other questions about sustainable technology or GPUs, feel free to ask!Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3070 ?

While the concept of “sustainable technology” might not be directly associated with a GPU like the RTX 3070, the responsibility for making its use more sustainable falls on a few key players:

1. Users:

• Gamers and Content Creators: By optimizing settings, undervolting (if comfortable), and practicing good maintenance, users can reduce the GPU’s power consumption and extend its lifespan.
• Informed Consumers: Choosing GPUs from manufacturers with responsible practices and considering the second-hand market for upgrades can make a difference.

2. Manufacturers:

• GPU Companies (like Nvidia): Implementing energy-efficient designs, using recycled materials, and adopting sustainable manufacturing processes are crucial steps.
• Hardware Manufacturers: Companies that build computers with the RTX 3070 can prioritize energy efficiency in their overall system design.

3. Software Developers:

• Game Developers: Optimizing games to reduce the demands on the GPU can lower power consumption and improve performance.
• Driver Developers (like Nvidia): Keeping drivers updated can improve efficiency and performance, contributing to sustainability.

4. Industry and Organizations:

• Technology Industry: Promoting standards and best practices for sustainable hardware design and manufacturing.
• Environmental Organizations: Raising awareness about the environmental impact of technology and advocating for sustainable practices.

5. Policymakers:

• Governments: Implementing policies that encourage energy efficiency and sustainable manufacturing in the technology sector.

Ultimately, it’s a shared responsibility to make the use of technology, including GPUs like the RTX 3070, more sustainable. By working together, users, manufacturers, software developers, and policymakers can contribute to a more environmentally friendly approach to technology.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3070 ?

The need for sustainable technology with something like an RTX 3070 is immediate and ongoing. It’s not a matter of “when” but rather a continuous effort. Here’s why:

• Environmental Impact: The manufacturing of GPUs, like the RTX 3070, consumes significant energy and resources, contributing to environmental issues like climate change and resource depletion. This impact starts from the moment the card is produced and continues throughout its lifecycle.  
• Energy Consumption: Even during use, GPUs consume a considerable amount of power, especially when gaming or performing demanding tasks. This energy consumption adds to your electricity bill and contributes to the overall energy demand, which often relies on fossil fuels.  
• E-waste: When GPUs become obsolete or are replaced, they contribute to electronic waste (e-waste). E-waste contains hazardous materials that can harm the environment and human health if not properly managed.  

Therefore, the need for sustainable practices related to the RTX 3070 and other GPUs is always present. It’s about:

• Reducing the environmental footprint of manufacturing: This requires manufacturers to adopt more sustainable production processes, use recycled materials, and minimize waste.  
• Minimizing energy consumption during use: Users can play a role by optimizing settings, undervolting (if comfortable), and ensuring efficient cooling.  
• Extending the lifespan of the GPU: Proper maintenance and considering the second-hand market for upgrades can help prolong the GPU’s use.  
• Responsible disposal and recycling: Ensuring that old GPUs are recycled properly to minimize e-waste and recover valuable materials.  

Essentially, the “when” for sustainable technology with the RTX 3070 is now and in the future. It’s an ongoing responsibility for users, manufacturers, and the industry as a whole to minimize the environmental impact of these powerful devices.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Trending Tech

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3070 ?

You’re right to think about where sustainable technology is needed in relation to the RTX 3070! It’s not just about the card itself, but the whole ecosystem around it. Here’s a breakdown of the key areas:

1. Manufacturing Facilities:

• GPU Production Plants: This is where the RTX 3070 is physically made. Sustainable practices are needed here to reduce energy consumption, minimize waste, and use less harmful chemicals in the production process.
• Component Suppliers: The companies that provide the raw materials and components for the RTX 3070 also need to adopt sustainable practices. This includes responsible sourcing of materials and reducing their environmental impact.

2. User Environments:

• Homes and Offices: Where users actually use the RTX 3070. This is where energy efficiency comes into play, with users optimizing settings and ensuring proper cooling to reduce power consumption.
• Data Centers: For cloud gaming or professional applications, RTX 3070s might be used in data centers. These facilities need to prioritize energy efficiency and use renewable energy sources to minimize their environmental footprint.  

3. E-waste Management:

• Recycling Facilities: When RTX 3070s reach the end of their lifespan, they need to be recycled responsibly. This requires specialized facilities that can safely extract valuable materials and prevent hazardous substances from harming the environment.

4. Research and Development:

• Labs and Universities: Where future GPUs are designed and developed. Sustainable technology needs to be integrated into the design process from the start, focusing on energy efficiency, material selection, and recyclability.

5. Policy and Regulation:

• Government Agencies: Implementing regulations and incentives to encourage sustainable practices throughout the lifecycle of GPUs, from manufacturing to disposal.

Essentially, sustainable technology is required at every stage of the RTX 3070’s journey, from its creation to its eventual recycling. It’s a collective effort involving manufacturers, users, recyclers, researchers, and policymakers to minimize the environmental impact of this powerful piece of technology.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3070 ?

You’re asking a great question that gets to the heart of how we can make using an RTX 3070 more sustainable. It’s not just about having the technology, but how we use it and manage it throughout its life cycle. Here’s how sustainable technology is required for the RTX 3070:

1. Sustainable Manufacturing:

• Eco-friendly Materials: Using recycled or sustainably sourced materials in the production of the RTX 3070. This reduces the need for virgin resources and minimizes the environmental impact of mining and processing raw materials.  
• Energy-efficient Production: Implementing manufacturing processes that use less energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This could involve using renewable energy sources in factories and optimizing production lines for efficiency.  
• Waste Reduction: Minimizing waste during the manufacturing process through better design and efficient use of materials. This includes reducing packaging waste and finding ways to reuse or recycle manufacturing byproducts.
• Responsible Chemical Management: Using less harmful chemicals in the production process and ensuring proper disposal of any hazardous waste to prevent pollution.

2. Sustainable Use:

• Energy Efficiency Optimization: Designing the RTX 3070 to be as energy-efficient as possible during use. This includes optimizing the architecture of the GPU and using power-saving features to reduce energy consumption.
• User Education: Educating users on how to optimize their settings and use the RTX 3070 in an energy-efficient way. This could involve providing tips on adjusting in-game settings, using power management tools, and ensuring proper cooling.
• Extending Lifespan: Encouraging users to extend the lifespan of their RTX 3070 through proper maintenance and repair. This reduces the need to replace the GPU as frequently, lowering the overall environmental impact.

3. Sustainable End-of-Life Management:

• Recycling Programs: Implementing programs to collect and recycle old RTX 3070s. This ensures that valuable materials are recovered and that hazardous substances are disposed of safely.
• E-waste Reduction: Reducing the amount of e-waste generated by RTX 3070s by promoting responsible recycling and extending the lifespan of the GPUs.

4. Innovation and Research:

• Developing new technologies: Investing in research and development to create more sustainable GPUs in the future. This could involve exploring new materials, architectures, and manufacturing processes that reduce environmental impact.

Essentially, sustainable technology is required for the RTX 3070 at every stage of its life cycle, from design and manufacturing to use and disposal. It involves a combination of technological innovation, responsible practices, and user awareness to minimize the environmental impact of this powerful piece of technology.Sources and related content

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3070 ?

Unfortunately, there isn’t a widely publicized, detailed case study specifically on the sustainable technology of the RTX 3070. This is likely because:

• Proprietary Information: Manufacturers like Nvidia often keep details about their manufacturing processes and material choices confidential for competitive reasons.
• Complex Supply Chains: Tracing the sustainability of every component in a GPU’s supply chain is a massive undertaking.
• Focus on Performance: Much of the public discussion around GPUs focuses on performance and features, rather than sustainability.

However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on the principles of sustainable technology and apply them to the RTX 3070. This will help illustrate how sustainability could be integrated into its lifecycle:

Hypothetical Case Study: Sustainable RTX 3070

Objective: To minimize the environmental impact of the RTX 3070 throughout its entire lifecycle.

Methodology:

1. Sustainable Manufacturing:
   • Materials: Replace traditional plastics with recycled or bio-based alternatives. Explore the use of recycled metals in the GPU’s construction.
   • Energy: Power manufacturing facilities with renewable energy sources and implement energy-efficient production processes.
   • Waste: Minimize waste by optimizing design and manufacturing processes. Implement closed-loop recycling systems for manufacturing byproducts.
   • Chemicals: Use less harmful chemicals in production and ensure proper disposal of any hazardous waste.
2. Sustainable Use:
   • Energy Efficiency: Design the RTX 3070 with power-saving features and optimize its architecture for energy efficiency.
   • User Education: Provide clear guidelines to users on how to optimize settings and use the GPU in an energy-efficient way.
   • Longevity: Encourage users to extend the lifespan of their RTX 3070 through proper maintenance and repair.
3. Sustainable End-of-Life Management:
   • Recycling Program: Establish a program to collect and recycle old RTX 3070s, ensuring proper material recovery and safe disposal of hazardous substances.
   • E-waste Reduction: Promote responsible recycling and extend the lifespan of GPUs to minimize e-waste generation.

Results:

• Reduced energy consumption during manufacturing and use.
• Lower reliance on virgin resources and decreased environmental impact from mining and processing.
• Minimized waste generation and increased material recovery through recycling.
• Reduced e-waste and proper management of hazardous substances.

Conclusion:

This hypothetical case study demonstrates how sustainable technology can be applied to the RTX 3070 to minimize its environmental footprint. While real-world implementation may face challenges, it highlights the importance of considering sustainability throughout the lifecycle of GPUs and other electronic devices.

Further Research:

• Investigate specific materials and manufacturing processes that can be used to make GPUs more sustainable.
• Develop more accurate methods for measuring the environmental impact of GPUs.
• Explore innovative solutions for e-waste management and material recovery.

By conducting further research and implementing sustainable practices, we can move towards a future where technology is both powerful and environmentally responsible.

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3070 ?

White Paper: Towards a Sustainable Lifecycle for the RTX 3070

Abstract:

The RTX 3070, a high-performance graphics processing unit (GPU), offers significant computing power for gaming, content creation, and other demanding applications. However, its lifecycle, from manufacturing to disposal, poses environmental challenges. This white paper explores the potential for integrating sustainable technology principles into the RTX 3070’s lifecycle, aiming to minimize its environmental footprint and promote responsible resource management.

1. Introduction:

The increasing demand for high-performance computing has led to a surge in GPU production. While GPUs like the RTX 3070 offer remarkable capabilities, their manufacturing processes are energy-intensive and resource-dependent. Furthermore, their eventual disposal contributes to the growing problem of electronic waste (e-waste). This white paper argues that a proactive approach to sustainability is essential for mitigating the environmental impact of GPUs.

2. Challenges and Opportunities:

2.1 Manufacturing:

• Energy Consumption: Semiconductor fabrication requires significant energy input, primarily derived from fossil fuels.
• Resource Depletion: The production of GPUs relies on rare earth minerals and other finite resources.
• Waste Generation: Manufacturing processes generate waste, including chemical byproducts and packaging materials.

Opportunities:

• Transitioning to renewable energy sources in manufacturing facilities.
• Exploring the use of recycled and sustainably sourced materials.
• Implementing closed-loop recycling systems for manufacturing waste.
• Optimizing manufacturing processes for greater efficiency and reduced waste.

2.2 Use Phase:

• Energy Consumption: GPUs consume substantial power during operation, contributing to electricity demand.
• Heat Generation: Efficient cooling is necessary to prevent overheating, which can further increase energy consumption.

Opportunities:

• Designing GPUs with improved energy efficiency and power management features.
• Educating users on optimizing settings and cooling solutions for reduced energy consumption.
• Developing software and drivers that enhance energy efficiency.

2.3 End-of-Life Management:

• E-waste: Improper disposal of GPUs contributes to e-waste, which contains hazardous materials that can harm the environment and human health.
• Resource Loss: Discarded GPUs contain valuable materials that could be recovered and reused.

Opportunities:

• Establishing robust recycling programs for GPUs.
• Developing innovative technologies for material recovery from e-waste.
• Promoting the reuse and refurbishment of GPUs.

3. Sustainable Technology Solutions:

3.1 Sustainable Manufacturing:

• Renewable Energy Integration: Powering manufacturing facilities with solar, wind, or other renewable energy sources.
• Recycled Materials: Utilizing recycled metals, plastics, and other materials in GPU production.
• Green Chemistry: Employing less harmful chemicals in manufacturing processes.
• Circular Economy Principles: Designing GPUs for disassembly and material recovery.

3.2 Sustainable Use:

• Power Optimization: Implementing power-saving features and optimizing GPU architecture for energy efficiency.
• Smart Cooling: Developing intelligent cooling systems that minimize energy consumption.
• User Education: Providing resources and tools to help users optimize energy consumption.

3.3 Sustainable End-of-Life Management:

• Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): Implementing EPR schemes to ensure responsible recycling and disposal of GPUs.
• E-waste Recycling Infrastructure: Investing in and expanding e-waste recycling facilities.
• Material Recovery Technologies: Developing advanced technologies for recovering valuable materials from e-waste.

4. Recommendations:

• Manufacturers should prioritize sustainable manufacturing practices, including renewable energy use, recycled materials, and waste reduction.
• Users should be educated on optimizing GPU settings and cooling solutions for energy efficiency.
• Industry stakeholders should collaborate to develop and implement robust e-waste recycling programs.
• Policymakers should incentivize sustainable practices and support research and development in green technology.

5. Conclusion:

Integrating sustainable technology principles into the lifecycle of the RTX 3070 and other GPUs is essential for minimizing their environmental impact. By adopting a holistic approach that encompasses sustainable manufacturing, use, and end-of-life management, we can ensure that high-performance computing and environmental responsibility go hand in hand. Further research and development in green technology, coupled with collaborative efforts from industry, users, and policymakers, are crucial for achieving a sustainable future for GPU technology.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3070 ?

While the RTX 3070 is primarily known for its gaming prowess, its powerful processing capabilities can be leveraged for various industrial applications, and sustainable technology can play a crucial role in optimizing its use in these settings. Here are some examples:

1. AI and Machine Learning:

• Sustainable AI Training: RTX 3070s can be used in data centers for training AI models. By optimizing energy consumption through efficient cooling and power management, the environmental impact of AI development can be reduced.  
• Edge AI: Deploying RTX 3070s at the edge of the network for real-time AI inference can minimize data transfer and reduce the reliance on centralized data centers, leading to energy savings.

2. Manufacturing and Automation:

• Robotics: RTX 3070s can power robots used in manufacturing and logistics. By optimizing their performance and energy consumption, these robots can contribute to more sustainable production processes.
• Quality Control: AI-powered quality control systems using RTX 3070s can improve efficiency and reduce waste in manufacturing by identifying defects early on.

3. Scientific Research:

• Climate Modeling: RTX 3070s can be used for climate modeling and simulations, helping researchers better understand climate change and develop sustainable solutions.
• Drug Discovery: GPUs can accelerate drug discovery research, potentially leading to more sustainable and efficient development of new medicines.  

4. Virtual and Augmented Reality:

• Sustainable Design: VR and AR applications powered by RTX 3070s can be used for designing sustainable products and infrastructure, allowing engineers to simulate and optimize their environmental impact before physical prototypes are built.
• Training and Education: VR and AR can be used for training and education in sustainable practices, such as renewable energy technologies and waste management.  

5. Smart Cities:

• Traffic Management: RTX 3070s can power AI-based traffic management systems that optimize traffic flow, reduce congestion, and minimize fuel consumption and emissions.
• Environmental Monitoring: GPUs can be used for analyzing data from environmental sensors to monitor pollution levels, identify environmental hazards, and develop sustainable solutions.  

How Sustainable Technology is Required:

• Energy Efficiency: Optimizing the RTX 3070’s power consumption through efficient hardware design and software optimization is crucial for reducing its environmental impact in industrial applications.
• Longevity: Extending the lifespan of RTX 3070s through proper maintenance and reuse can minimize the need for frequent replacements and reduce e-waste.
• Responsible Recycling: Ensuring that RTX 3070s are recycled responsibly at the end of their life cycle is essential for recovering valuable materials and preventing environmental pollution.

By integrating sustainable technology principles into the use of RTX 3070s in industrial applications, we can leverage their powerful capabilities while minimizing their environmental footprint and contributing to a more sustainable future.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3070 ?

You’re right to focus on research and development! That’s where the real breakthroughs in sustainable technology for GPUs like the RTX 3070 will happen. Here are some key areas of research and development:

1. Advanced Materials:

• Exploring alternatives to rare earth minerals: Researching and developing materials that can replace rare earth minerals, which are often mined in environmentally damaging ways. This could involve using more abundant and sustainably sourced materials or developing new materials with similar properties.
• Developing bio-based and biodegradable materials: Investigating the use of bio-based plastics and other biodegradable materials in GPU construction to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and minimize e-waste.
• Improving material recyclability: Researching materials that are easier to recycle and recover valuable components from, facilitating a circular economy for GPUs.

2. Energy-Efficient Architectures:

• Optimizing GPU design for power efficiency: Developing new GPU architectures that are inherently more energy-efficient, reducing power consumption without sacrificing performance.  
• Exploring new computing paradigms: Investigating alternative computing paradigms, such as neuromorphic computing, that could offer significant energy efficiency advantages over traditional GPU architectures.  
• Developing advanced cooling solutions: Researching and developing more efficient cooling solutions that minimize energy consumption and reduce reliance on traditional fans and heat sinks.

3. Sustainable Manufacturing Processes:

• Reducing energy consumption in semiconductor fabrication: Developing new semiconductor manufacturing processes that require less energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  
• Minimizing waste generation: Researching and implementing manufacturing processes that minimize waste and maximize resource utilization.
• Developing closed-loop recycling systems: Creating systems for recovering and reusing materials from manufacturing byproducts, reducing the need for virgin resources.

4. Software and AI-driven Optimization:

• Developing AI-powered energy management tools: Creating software tools that use AI to optimize GPU power consumption in real-time, based on workload demands and user preferences.
• Improving software efficiency: Developing software and drivers that are optimized for energy efficiency, reducing the demands on the GPU and lowering power consumption.  
• AI-assisted design for sustainability: Using AI to assist in the design of more sustainable GPUs, considering factors like material selection, energy efficiency, and recyclability from the initial design phase.

5. E-waste Management and Recycling:

• Developing advanced recycling technologies: Researching and developing new technologies for recovering valuable materials from e-waste, such as rare earth minerals and precious metals.
• Improving e-waste collection and processing systems: Creating more efficient and effective systems for collecting and processing e-waste, ensuring that GPUs are recycled responsibly.
• Exploring reuse and refurbishment models: Investigating models for reusing and refurbishing GPUs, extending their lifespan and reducing the need for new production.

By investing in these areas of research and development, we can pave the way for more sustainable GPUs like the RTX 3070, minimizing their environmental impact and contributing to a more sustainable future for technology.Sources and related content

COURTESY : RBC

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.